This application relates generally to integrated optics and, in particular, to interfaces that facilitate edge coupling, e.g., chip-to-chip coupling, optical fiber-to-photonic chip coupling, and the like.
Many integrated photonic applications, such as radio-frequency signal processing and optical neural networks, require robust and low loss operation over polarization and wavelength. While integrated photonic components can be designed to meet these specifications, coupling light to and from a photonic integrated circuit (PIC) has been a difficult challenge. In particular, the difficulty lies in the large modal mismatch between an integrated waveguide and a standard single-mode (e.g., SMF-28) fiber, and this mismatch inhibits efficient optical input-output (IO) coupling.
Today, two main solutions exist to address this problem, namely, edge (also referred to as in-plane, butt or end-fire) coupling, and vertical (out-of-plane) coupling. A typical edge coupler (EC) has an inverse taper structure wherein the waveguide width gradually reduces along the direction of light propagation to a small value at an end tip. Edge coupling benefits from polarization independence and operation over large bandwidths, but the approach necessitates a large overlap between the fiber and waveguide optical modes. Further, a typical single inverted taper-based mode converter fails to simultaneously provide low coupling loss, polarization independence, and broad bandwidth operation. For instance, an inverted taper coupler for silicon-on-insulator ridge waveguide can achieve ˜0.36 dB and ˜0.66 dB coupling losses for TM and TE waveguide modes, respectively, but only over a working bandwidth of 80 nm. Vertical coupling, on the other hand, redirects the light out of the waveguide plane, typically through the use of diffractive gratings. Diffractive gratings, however, suffer from high polarization and wavelength sensitivity, leading to lower coupling efficiency.
There remains a need to provide for improved optical fiber-to-PIC interfaces.
A mode converter formed by three (3) parallel tapered waveguides on a SiN platform is configured for low loss, polarization-independent and broad bandwidth coupling of light to an optical fiber. The waveguides form a trident structure comprising a main, central waveguide with an inverse taper structure (i.e., wherein the waveguide width gradually reduces along the direction of light propagation to a small value at an end tip), and preferably an adjacent waveguide positioned on each respective side of the main, central waveguide. Each adjacent waveguide has a taper structure but one that is opposed to that of the main waveguide. In particular, each adjacent waveguide has a width that gradually increases along the direction of light propagation to a larger value at an end tip. The end tips of the three parallel waveguides terminate along a common input/output facet of the converter. The adjacent waveguides help to shape the mode of the light propagating through the main waveguide, in so doing enabling the converter to exhibit high coupling efficiency and polarization independence in the full optical communication bands (i.e., from O to L-band) by successfully tuning the mode shape at a chip facet. The trident mode converter enables efficient and robust fiber-to-chip coupling and is useful in many applications, e.g., optical neural networks, RF-photonic filters, and others.
The foregoing has outlined some of the more pertinent features of the subject matter. These features should be construed to be merely illustrative. Many other beneficial results can be attained by applying the disclosed subject matter in a different manner or by modifying the subject matter as will be described.
For a more complete understanding of the subject matter and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The following description assumes familiarity for silicon (Si) photonics, which is the known study and application of photonic systems using silicon as the optical medium. The silicon typically is patterned into micro-photonic components (typically Si waveguides) that operate in the infrared band, most commonly at the 1.55 micrometer wavelength used in many fiber optic telecommunications system. Photonic integrated circuits are fabricated from a variety of material systems, including electro-optic crystals such as lithium niobate, silica on silicon, Silicon on insulator, silicon nitride (SiN) as well as various polymers and semiconductor materials. While silicon photonics provide many useful properties, the compatibility of this platform with optical fiber components is still limited. This is because of the large size mismatch between the optical fiber and the silicon photonic waveguide modal distribution. The trident mode converter of this disclosure addresses the problem of how to efficiently couple light to and from the silicon photonic components.
To this end, and with reference now to
In this preferred embodiment, a maximal overlapping integral of mode area with the optical fiber is attained, preferably by tuning the geometry of the waveguides, thereby enabling a proper mode shape at the facet 108. The coupling efficiency of a mode converter is calculated (equation (1) below) from the overlap integral between an optical fiber mode and a mode at the converter tip near the chip facet:
where Ef(x,y) and Ew(x,y) are the electric field profiles of the fiber and converter tip waveguide, respectively. Minimizing fiber-to-chip coupling loss involves engineering the waveguide mode shape to match the fiber mode.
For example, and with reference to
If not addressed, the difference in refractive index for the two orthogonal polarizations (i.e., birefringence) can induce polarization dependent behavior for an optical waveguide, such as the SSC. To reduce the modal birefringence, Δneff=neff_TM−neff_TE, there are two typical approaches used, namely, by changing either the properties of the material, or the geometry of the waveguides. The design of the trident mode converter leverages the second approach. In particular, and as has been described, in one embodiment the converter comprises a SiN polarization independent waveguide geometry having a cross section of 0.4 μm×0.4 μm, and the two side waveguides are positioned (formed) close to the center waveguide with appropriate Wcenter, Wside, and Wspacing parameters. In this way the minimal modal birefringence of ˜0.001 can be attained. Contour plot 400 depicts the result, namely, equal coupling efficiencies with fiber for the TE and TM modes (i.e., polarization independence).
As depicted in
As also depicted in
While the trident configuration described is preferred, it is not intending to be limiting. The mode shaping provided by the adjacent waveguides may instead be carried out using just a single adjacent waveguide, and that single adjacent waveguide may also be configured above or below the main waveguide. Further, the converter may be configured to use three or more adjacent waveguides, e.g., waveguides situated to the left, right, above and/or below the main waveguide, or any combination (of the adjacent waveguides). In addition, although the above-described and illustrative embodiment (e.g., converter 100, in
As the above-described plots illustrate, the mode converter of this disclosure simultaneously provides low coupling loss, polarization independence, and broad bandwidth operation. The particular application(s) for the mode converter are varied and include, without limitation, optical neural networks, RF-photonic filters, and others.
The particular nature of the edge coupling provided by the mode converter may vary. In the typical use case, as has been described and depicted, the mode converter couples a photonic chip to an optical fiber. Other use cases include, without limitation, passive chip-to-passive chip coupling, passive chip-to-active chip coupling, and the like.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4608569 | Dickey, Jr. et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
5444864 | Smith | Aug 1995 | A |
5578845 | Yoshiyuki et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5699176 | Cohen | Dec 1997 | A |
RE35736 | Powell | Feb 1998 | E |
5757312 | Szmurlo | May 1998 | A |
5867293 | Kotten | Feb 1999 | A |
5904546 | Wood et al. | May 1999 | A |
6359714 | Imajo | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373909 | Lindquist | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6507728 | Watanabe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539204 | Marsh | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567648 | Ahn | May 2003 | B1 |
6567649 | Souissi | May 2003 | B2 |
6745018 | Zehavi | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751447 | Jin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760454 | Shreve | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771931 | Waltho | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778319 | Chavez-Pirson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6907093 | Blount | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7020396 | Izadpanah | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7058368 | Nicholls | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064697 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7085497 | Tiemann | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7123676 | Gebara | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130289 | Kuan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7355993 | Adkins | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366244 | Gebara | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7446601 | LeChevalier | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7496257 | Levner | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7509054 | Calabro et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7566634 | Beyne et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7650080 | Yap | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7660531 | Lee | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672643 | Loh | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680368 | Welch et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7711329 | Aparin | May 2010 | B2 |
7720029 | Orava | May 2010 | B2 |
7729431 | Gebara | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756480 | Loh | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7809047 | Kummetz | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826808 | Faulkner | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853195 | Higgins | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7869527 | Vetter | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876867 | Filipovic | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7907895 | Shinagawa | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917177 | Bauman | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8036606 | Kenington | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8055235 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8078130 | Fudge | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081946 | Fudge | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8155605 | Hwang | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170487 | Sahota et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8233872 | Nagai | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8249540 | Gupta | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8270843 | Nakamoto | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8299555 | Su et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8320504 | Peng | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331509 | Wang | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8351874 | Dent | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8477871 | Neumann | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8521090 | Kim | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526903 | Gudem | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8565681 | Kim | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8600200 | Rakich et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8618966 | Kanter | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8682170 | Prucnal | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8730786 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
8781030 | Peng | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8785332 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8805298 | McCallister | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8845854 | Lei et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8867928 | Piehler | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8872583 | Lee | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8971712 | Fan et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8977223 | Gupta | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9020307 | Ishikawa | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9100099 | Loh | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9106453 | Wang | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9178635 | Ben-Shlomo | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9184902 | Khojastepour | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9195052 | Long | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9214718 | Mow | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224650 | Lei et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9252857 | Negus | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9253003 | Harel | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9257811 | Gao | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9258052 | George | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9268092 | Jarecki, Jr. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9344125 | Kpodzo | May 2016 | B2 |
9344139 | Sjoland | May 2016 | B2 |
9385268 | Minamiru et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9391667 | Sundstrom | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9438288 | Feld | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9450623 | Weissman | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9490963 | Choi | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9520985 | Choi | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9571205 | Suarez | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9589812 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9602149 | Tanzi | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9608718 | Monsen | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9651652 | Kpodzo et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9667404 | Sjoland | May 2017 | B2 |
9696492 | Cox | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9698913 | Foster | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9703056 | Neelantan et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9712233 | Deng | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9722713 | Tanzi | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723612 | Stapleton | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9726821 | Murray | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9748906 | Stewart | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9768852 | Ling | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9774364 | Shih | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9775123 | Harel | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9793943 | Sjoland | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9793992 | Hino | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9807700 | Harel | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9847258 | Rohleder et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9871552 | Din | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9885806 | Steinhardt | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9885825 | Kopp | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9900044 | Sjoland | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9923593 | Andersson | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9923708 | Khandani | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9960805 | Wyville | May 2018 | B2 |
9960850 | Daniel | May 2018 | B2 |
9973282 | Welch | May 2018 | B2 |
9997363 | Ono et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10009120 | Ranson | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10027465 | Sjoland | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10031246 | Zhou | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10038471 | Chang | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10084506 | Sjoland | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10110306 | Jain et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10177836 | Hong | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10187158 | Kikuchi | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10191217 | Boutami | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10257746 | Jain et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10321357 | Jain et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10325861 | Miccoli | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10341028 | Kanter | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10356782 | Negus | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367584 | Rakich | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10418775 | Gao | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10491313 | Jain | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10656350 | Chen et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10663663 | Painchaud | May 2020 | B2 |
10673519 | Hong | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10727945 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
10754091 | Nagarajan | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10873877 | Jain et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20030161637 | Yamamoto | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040151238 | Masenten | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040264610 | Marro | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20110065408 | Kenington | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065409 | Kenington | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130295980 | Reuven | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140169236 | Choi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20160103341 | Long | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170176780 | Levy et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180006795 | Raaf | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180248627 | Daniel | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190007140 | Vishwanath et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200209476 | Mattis et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200229031 | Jain et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20210036779 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101379718 | Mar 2009 | CN |
104484852 | Apr 2015 | CN |
3561561 | Oct 2019 | EP |
2139374 | Nov 1984 | GB |
2002214461 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2006301415 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2474056 | Jan 2013 | RU |
WO 06072086 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 07092767 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 08036356 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 12112357 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 16118079 | Jul 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chang et al., “Full-duplex spectrum sensing in cognitive radios using optical self-interference cancellation,” 2015 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), IEEE, pp. 341-344, Dec. 8, 2015. |
IBM, “Silicon Nanophotonic Packaging,” https://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_group_subpage.php?id=5522, Jul. 2016. |
Li et al., “Multimode silicon photonics,” Nanophotonics, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 227-247, May 16, 2019. |
Mothe et al., “Multichannel Microwave Photonics Signals Summation Device,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 140-142, Feb. 1, 2011. |
Velha et al., “Simultaneous data transmissions on engineered closely packed silicon-on-insulator waveguide arrays,” 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), IEEE, pp. 1-4, Jul. 2, 2017. |
Tang et al., “System limitations due to channel cross-coupling in a highly parallel polymer-based single-mode channel waveguide array,” Advances in Resistive Technology and Processing XVI, vol. 2042, 12 pages, Aug. 16, 1993. |
Tartaret-Josniére et al., “Microwave Photonics Summation Device with up to 19 Input Signals in K and Ku Bands,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 34, No. 20, pp. 4715-4721, Oct. 15, 2016. |
Yoo et al., “Heterogeneous 2D/3D photonic integrated microsystems,” Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 2, 16030, Aug. 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210088724 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |