Low noise charge pump method and apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10965276
  • Patent Number
    10,965,276
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 18, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 30, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A charge pump method and apparatus is described having various aspects. Noise injection from a charge pump to other circuits may be reduced by limiting both positive and negative clock transition rates, as well as by limiting drive currents within clock generator driver circuits, and also by increasing a control node AC impedance of certain transfer capacitor coupling switches. A single-phase clock may be used to control as many as all active switches within a charge pump, and capacitive coupling may simplify biasing and timing for clock signals controlling transfer capacitor coupling switches. Any combination of such aspects of the method or apparatus may be employed to quiet and/or simplify charge pump designs over a wide range of charge pump architectures.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention

This invention generally relates to electronic power supplies, and more specifically to capacitive energy transfer DC-to-DC converters (DC/DC converters), such as charge pumps.


2. Related Art

DC/DC converter power supply circuits provide a DC output voltage based upon a DC source voltage. The output is typically at a different voltage than the input. As the term is used herein, DC/DC converters do not encompass voltage reduction regulator circuits that use a linear pass device, but rather involve energy transfer from input to output through an energy storage device, such as a capacitor or an inductor.


The DC/DC converters of interest herein are charge pumps, which obtain energy for the output voltage primarily by means of capacitive transfer from the source to the output. An inductor is not generally the primary energy transfer device in a charge pump, though of course hybrid devices are possible that employ inductive energy transfer in addition to capacitive energy transfer. A charge pump may derive an output voltage that is higher than a source voltage, or that is inverted from a source voltage, or that is referenced to a different voltage than the source voltage, and indeed may do all of these things concurrently.


Charge pumps may be implemented for a wide variety of purposes. They are well suited for integrated circuit fabrication because the devices and elements required are compatible with most integrated circuit fabrication techniques. For example, a charge pump may be employed to generate a negative gate bias supply for an integrated circuit that switches an antenna between send and receive circuitry of a transceiver, as shown in FIG. 1. Many wireless transceivers, such as cellular telephones, employ a single antenna for both receiving and transmitting. While such systems are receiving, an antenna 102 must be coupled to receive circuitry that may include, for example, a filter 104 and a low noise amplifier 106, to provide the received signal for further processing. However, while such systems are transmitting, the antenna 102 must be disconnected from the sensitive receive circuitry and coupled instead to relatively high power transmit circuitry. The transmit circuitry may include, for example, a power amplifier 108 and a transmit filter 110 to process a transmit signal.


A RF switch 112 may be used to perform such antenna switching functions. Ideally, such switches may be integrated together with the receive and/or transmit circuitry, and in any event are desirably very small, due to space limitations in portable transceivers such as mobile telephones and handy talkies. In order to achieve good performance from switching devices, such as MOSFETs, used to implement such RF switches, many designs need a special bias supply that extends negatively below the supply rails of the transmit and receive circuitry, such as a −3V supply. In view of the space and cost constraints of transceiver units such as mobile telephones, a charge pump is particularly suitable for generating such a bias supply, because it can be readily integrated into a very small circuit.


The RF switch 112 conveys relatively high power signals to the antenna 102 during transmission. However, during receive, the signal passed by the RF switch 112 may be measured in tens of nanovolts. Sharp noise transitions may have an extremely broad Fourier frequency content, and thus even signals at amplitudes on the order of millivolts may interfere unacceptably with reception if the signals have extremely fast edges. While the filter 104 can remove some noise, it is important that the RF switch 112 not introduce noise, particularly noise having components near the center frequency of the received signal. Thus, the receive/transmit switch of FIG. 1 illustrates one of many circumstances in which a charge pump may be desired for a circuit that nonetheless requires extremely low noise.


Unfortunately, noise generation is one of the most common drawbacks of charge pumps. Current spikes are typically coupled into both input and output supplies, together with voltage ripples and spikes. When a charge pump is integrated together with other devices, such electronic noise may be coupled throughout the circuitry of the integrated device by a variety of mechanisms that are difficult to control. Thus, a need exists for charge pumps that avoid generating excessive noise, so as to reduce charge pump noise injection into source supplies, output supplies, and related circuits.


The method and apparatus presented herein address this need for a low-noise charge pump. Various aspects of the method and apparatus described herein will be seen to provide further advantages, as well, for the design and construction of charge pumps that are relatively free of noise spurs.


SUMMARY

A charge pump method and apparatus for DC-to-DC conversion is set forth by which an output is generated by alternately coupling a transfer capacitor to an input supply and then to the output. A charge pump clock output is generated to control a transfer capacitor coupling switch in a charge pump circuit. The charge pump method (or apparatus) further includes a combination of one or more aspects of the method or apparatus, as set forth below, in order to reduce noise or otherwise improve the design.


One aspect of the charge pump method described herein includes generating an output supply by transferring charge from a source voltage to a transfer capacitor (“TC”) alternately with transferring charge from the TC to the output supply. A TC-coupling switch (“TCCS”) circuit is a switch that couples the TC to a supply under control of a charge pump clock (“CPClk”). This method includes coupling the TC to the output supply during discharge periods via a discharging TCCS circuit, and actively limiting a rate of voltage change of the CPClk output during both positive and negative transitions.


An aspect of the charge pump apparatus described herein may be employed to generate an output voltage supply within a circuit. This aspect includes a transfer capacitor (“TC”) and a plurality of TC coupling switches (“TCCSs”), each TCCS controlled by a charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output. The apparatus also has a CPClk generation circuit, which includes circuitry that limits a rate of rise of the CPClk output and circuitry that limits a rate of fall of the CPClk output. The TCCSs are coupled to the TC, and are controlled to couple the TC to a voltage source during periodic first periods, and to couple the TC to the output voltage during periodic second periods that are not concurrent with the first periods.


Another aspect of the charge pump apparatus described herein may be also be used for generating an output voltage supply within a circuit. This aspect includes a transfer capacitor (“TC”) coupled alternately between source connections and output connections, and a plurality of active switches that are each switchable under control of a charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output to conduct, or not. This aspect includes a CPClk generating circuit that has an active driver circuit configured to source current to, and sink current from, a driver output node, together with circuitry to limit the source current, and circuitry to limit the sink current, of the active driver circuit.


Another aspect of the charge pump described herein is a method of alternately transferring charge from a source voltage to a transfer capacitor (“TC”), and from the TC to an output supply, to generate an output supply. The method includes coupling the TC to the output supply via a discharging switch under control of a charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output. The method also includes limiting source and sink currents between a driver circuit and a corresponding output node, within a generator circuit of the CPClk.


Yet another aspect of the charge pump method described herein alternately transfers charge from a source voltage to a transfer capacitor (“TC”), and from the TC to an output supply. This method includes coupling the TC to the output supply during discharge periods via a discharging switch circuit under control of a single phase charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output, and coupling the TC to the voltage source via a charging switch circuit under control of the single phase CPClk output.


A related aspect of the charge pump apparatus described herein may be used for generating an output voltage supply. This apparatus includes a transfer capacitor (“TC”), one or more source switching devices in series between the TC and the source voltage, and one or more output switching devices in series between the TC and the output supply. A single phase output of a charge pump clock (“CPClk”) generating circuit is coupled to all of the source switching devices to cause them to conduct only during charge periods, and is also coupled to all of the output switching devices to cause them to conduct only during discharge periods, wherein the charge and discharge periods alternate and do not overlap.


A further aspect of the charge pump method described herein may generate an output supply by alternately transferring charge from a source voltage to a transfer capacitor (“TC”), and from the TC to the output supply. This method includes coupling a first charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output to a TC charging switch control node via a first capacitive coupling network, and coupling the TC to the source voltage during charge periods under control of the first CPClk output. The method also includes coupling a second CPClk output to a TC discharging switch control node via a second capacitive coupling network, and coupling the TC to the output supply during discharge periods that nonconcurrently alternate with the charge periods, under control of the second CPClk output.


A further aspect of the charge pump apparatus described herein may be used for generating an output voltage supply, and includes a transfer capacitor (“TC”). This apparatus includes one or more source switching devices, having a corresponding control node, disposed in series between the TC and a source supply, and also includes one or more output switching devices, having corresponding control nodes, disposed in series between the TC and the output supply. This apparatus also includes a capacitive coupling circuit coupling a charge pump clock output to the control node of a source switching device or to the control node of an output switching device.


Yet a further method aspect of the charge pump described herein includes steps of disposing an output hot switch between a transfer capacitor (“TC”) node and a charge pump output, and disposing an output common switch between the opposite TC node and a common connection of the charge pump output. This method also includes establishing a higher control node AC impedance for the hot switch, as compared to a control node AC impedance for the output common switch. A related aspect provides apparatus generally corresponding to this method.


Embodiments of the charge pump method or apparatus may employ any combination of individual aspects of the method or apparatus, and may be configured in a wide range of charge pump architectures and configurations.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following figures, in which like reference numbers and designations indicate like elements.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating use of a RF switch.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating basic charge pump operations.



FIG. 3 is a charge pump schematic diagram illustrating some of the current paths in which noise may be reduced by employing aspects of the method and apparatus described herein.



FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of exemplary current-limited inverters.



FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a current-starved oscillator for a charge pump.



FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a charge pump in which the active switches are coupled to control signals by means of capacitive coupling.



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a charge pump employing passive switches.



FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of charge pump switches having a control node capacitively coupled to a charge pump clock output.



FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating alternative charge pump configurations.



FIG. 10 is a block schematic diagram illustrating techniques for using charge pumps to produce arbitrary output voltages.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Overview—Charge Pump Configurations



FIG. 2 illustrates some basic charge pump operations. Filtering capacitors, typically present on each input and output supply, are omitted from FIG. 2 to avoid confusion with an energy transfer capacitor CT 202. When S1204 and S2206 are closed, CT 202 is connected to the source DC supply connections VS+ 208 and VS210, and thus CT 202 is charged to the voltage VS, having a value [(Vs+)−(Vs−)]. S1204 and S2206 are then opened, permitting CT 202 to float. Next, S3212 and S4214 are closed, causing the floating transfer capacitor CT 202 to “fly” to the output supply (for which reason such capacitors are also called fly capacitors). The charged CT is thus connected to output supply connections Vo1+ 216 and Vo1− 218 (output Vo1). Presuming that the voltage of output Vo1 is smaller than the voltage stored on CT 202, CT 202 discharges, transferring energy to Vo1, which may be an output supply.


Many different output configurations are possible using just these four switches S1204, S2206, S3212 and S4214, together with the transfer capacitor CT 202. A first example is a voltage doubling configuration, wherein Vo1− 218 is connected to VS+ 208, causing Vo1+ 216 to achieve a voltage roughly twice that of VS+ 208 (both with respect to VS210, neglecting losses). A second example is a voltage inverting configuration, in which Vo1+ 216 is connected to VS210, such that Vo1− will reach approximately −VS (with respect to VS210). A third example is a supply isolating configuration, in which neither Vo1+ 216 nor Vo1− 218 is tied through a fixed voltage connection to a source voltage connection. Rather, the input lines may be isolated from the output insofar as is permitted by the isolation capability of the switches S1204 and S3212, and of the switches S2206 and S4214.


The skilled person will understand certain features without a need for explicit details. For example, because the transfer capacitor CT 202 must be disconnected from the output while connecting to the input, maintaining a reasonably constant voltage on the output generally requires a storage device. Such storage device typically comprises a filter capacitor, which is not shown in FIG. 2. As another example, current and voltage for the output may vary depending upon many factors. The skilled person may make allowance for such factors to anticipate a voltage of the output, or may choose to regulate the voltage of the output. Such regulation is not shown, but may, for example, comprise controlling the frequency of “pump” cycles during which CT 202 is first charged to VS and then discharged to voltage Vo1. Regulation may also comprise controlling a value of the voltage source for the charge pump, as described with respect to FIG. 10 below.


Additional output connection switches, such as S5220 and S6222, may enable a charge pump to provide other voltages, multiplexing the use of a single transfer or fly capacitor CT 202. For example, charge and discharge cycles may alternate without overlapping. CT may be charged to VS during each charge cycle. However, during one discharge cycle, CT may be discharged to Vo2 (Vo2+ 224 to Vo2− 226), while during another discharge cycle CT is discharged to Vo1. In this manner, three voltages of roughly equal value may be created—VS, Vo1 and Vo2. The connections made between these voltages determines whether the charge pump circuit functions as a voltage tripler, or as a double-voltage inverter, an isolated 2*VS supply, two isolated outputs, etc. These principles may be extended to further output combinations.


In typical implementations, each of the switches S1204, S2206, S3212 and S4214 (as well as other switches if used, such as S5220 and S6222) may comprise an appropriate transistor, such as a MOSFET. However, in many circumstances it is possible to substitute a simple diode for a switch, when the voltage and current flow requirements of the particular configuration of a specific charge pump circuit permit.


The basic charge pump architecture illustrated in FIG. 2 may also be replicated for operation in a “push-pull” fashion. For this purpose, a second CT may be connected to VS while the first CT is connected to Vo1, and then such second CT may be discharged to Vo1 the first CT is connected to VS. Such techniques may provide more constant current capacity to the output supply, and may aid in reducing output voltage ripple. Thus, charge pump DC/DC converters may be designed in a wide range of configurations to provide many different outputs from a single DC supply.


Charge Pump Noise


As noted above, noise is one of the most common problems associated with charge pumps. FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary charge pump architecture, showing some of the paths in which noise currents may typically occur. The charge pump of FIG. 3 includes a transfer capacitor CT 202, together with source supply connections Vs+ 208 and Vs− 210, which are substantially as shown in FIG. 2, and accordingly are identically numbered. FIG. 3 also includes output supply connections Vo+ 316 and Vo− 318. The fly capacitor coupling switches, which couple CT 202 to the source supply Vs or to the output supply Vo, are shown as MOSFET devices controlled by a signal applied to a control node (the device gate). The fly capacitor coupling switches include a P-channel switch 304 under control of a first clock output 354, a P-channel switch 306 under control of a second clock output 356, an N-channel switch 312 under control of a third clock output 362, and an N-channel switch 314 under control of a fourth clock output 364. The four charge pump clock outputs (354, 356, 362, and 364) are generated in a charge pump clock generator circuit 350. A filter capacitor 330 for the output supply Vo, as well as a current load 332 on Vo, are also shown.


Four ammeters are represented to illustrate paths in which noise currents may occur. From these paths, noise may be unintentionally coupled other circuits associated with the charge pump. For example, voltage noise may be coupled into other circuits through common supply connections, or via parasitic capacitive coupling, while current noise may be injected into other circuits through inductive coupling, or via a shared impedance. A source loading ammeter 342 is disposed between the source supply Vs+ 208 and the switch 304, and an output charging ammeter 344 is disposed between the switch 312 and the output filter capacitor 330. Clock generator ammeters are disposed between the clock generator 350 and its supply source, with ammeter 346 between Vs+ 208 and clock generator 350, and ammeter 348 between the clock generator 350 and Vs− 210. The explanation of charge pump noise currents, which is set forth below with reference to these four ammeters, is representative in nature, and is not intended to be comprehensive.


In FIG. 3, a charging period begins at the moment when both the switches 304 and 306 are closed, such that the CT 202 is connected across the source supply and the ammeter 342 registers the charging current for CT 202. An amplitude of a spike in the charging current is passively limited by the source impedance of the supply Vs and the parasitic resistance of CT 202 itself, as well as by the difference between Vs and the voltage on the CT 202. The spike amplitude may also be limited by active control of conduction by the switches 304 and 306. In addition to controlling peak amplitude, a rate of rise of the charging current, di/dt, may be limited by limiting the speed with which the switches 304 and 306 are turned on.


At the end of the charging period, the switches 304 and 306 will be turned off. A change in current will register in the ammeter 342 if CT 202 is not fully charged at this time, with a di/dt slope that depends in part upon the speed with which the series combination of switches 304 and 306 is turned off. Because the first clock output 354 and the second clock output 356 are coupled to corresponding control nodes of switches 304 and 306, respectively, the outputs 354 and 356 will be driven up to a voltage greater than their threshold voltages, which will induce a nonconducting off state in these switches. To drive up the voltage of the control nodes, these clock outputs source current to drive the gate capacitance (and/or other parasitic capacitances and impedances) of the corresponding switch. The drive current will register in the ammeter 346. Due to the parasitic capacitances, a high dv/dt gate drive will typically cause a significant capacitive current spike in the corresponding ammeter 346.


After the switches 304 and 306 are off, a discharge period may ensue that does not overlap the charge period. To begin the discharge period, the third clock 362 and the fourth clock 364 will raise voltages of control nodes of the switches 314 and 312, respectively, above a Vgs threshold voltage to turn each switch on to a conducting state. The resulting capacitive gate current of the switches 312 and 314 will register in the ammeter 346, with a peak value and di/dt that depend in part upon dv/dt of the clock output. In order to minimize power dissipation in the switches, the clock edges in such circuits have typically been made rather fast.


As the later of switches 312 and 314 turns on, CT 202 begins discharging into Co 330 with a current that will register in the ammeter 344. At the end of the discharge clock period, the third clock output 362 and the fourth clock output 364 sink current to drive down to an off voltage, causing gate currents, to discharge the gate capacitance of the corresponding switches, that will register in ammeter 348. Finally, CT 202 is disconnected from Co 330, which may cause another current step to register in the ammeter 344 if discharging of CT 202 has not been completed.


All switches remain off until the clock outputs 354 and 356 sink current from the gates of switches 304 and 306, respectively, to reduce the control node voltage of those switches to a level that is negatively greater than their Vgs thresholds, thereby causing the switches to turn on and begin the charging period. The sink current provided by the clock outputs 354 and 356 to effect this change will register in the ammeter 348. A di/dt of such current depends substantially upon a magnitude of the dv/dt at which these clock outputs transition negatively.


Each high di/dt current spike described above is likely to be coupled into nearby circuitry, whether through mutual inductances, common impedances, or common connections. Reducing some or all of the identified noise sources may be desirable for circuits, such as that described with respect to FIG. 1, which need a charge pump DC/DC converter but also require very low noise. Various features of the following figure, taken in combinations, may be employed to construct such a desirable charge pump. Other benefits will also become apparent, such as the convenience and simplicity of control by a single-phase clock.


Quiet Inverting Charge Pump



FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 illustrate an exemplary quiet, inverting embodiment of a charge pump. FIG. 4 illustrates exemplary circuitry for establishing current-limited drive circuits (here, inverters), which may be used within a charge pump clock generating circuit. FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary charge pump clock generating circuit that utilizes current-limited, inverting drive circuits configured to form a current-starved ring oscillator. FIG. 6 illustrates using a single charge pump clock output to drive all of the active fly capacitor coupling switches in an exemplary charge pump. Throughout the descriptions that are set forth below, size references for some exemplary FET devices are indicated parenthetically as a channel width (W) and length (L), in micron units. These size references are appropriate for a low voltage silicon-on-insulator (“SOI”) integrated circuit, and are useful for relative size considerations. In an exemplary embodiment, threshold voltages for P-channel MOSFETs are −0.25 V, and for N-channel MOSFETs are +0.5 V. Device sizes, threshold voltages, and other considerations may, of course, be adjusted as appropriate for varying designs and processes, and indeed alternatives to MOSFETS, such as BJTs or other amplifying/switching devices, may be used with appropriate adaptation.



FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a current limited, inverting drive circuit. An input voltage supply is connected via Vin+ 402 and common connection 404. A reference current, limited by a resistor 406, is established through diode-connected MOSFETs 408 (W 7.5, L 2) and 410 (W 7.5, L 4) to create a P-gate reference voltage 412 and an N-gate reference voltage 414. The drive circuit 416 has an input node 418 and an output node 420, and is formed by connecting a P-channel FET 422 (W 5, L 0.8) in series with an N-channel FET 424 (W 2, L 0.8), as shown. The drive circuit 416 drives current to the output node 420, sourcing or sinking current to raise or lower the voltage of the output node. Circuitry is provided that limits the current drive capability of the drive circuit 416, as compared to an absence of such devices. “Absence” of a series device should be understood to mean replacement by a direct connection, while “absence” of a parallel device should be understood to mean merely omission of such device.


The current source capability of the driver circuit 416 is limited through a source current limit circuit 426, which may, for example, comprise a P-channel FET 428 (W 1.5, L 2). The FET 428 may be gate-coupled to the P-gate reference 412 as a current mirror that limits current, for example, to 1 μA or less. The current sink capability of the driver circuit 416 may be similarly limited by a sink current limit circuit 430, comprised for example of an N-channel FET 432 (W 1.5, L 4) coupled to the N-gate reference 414 as a current mirror (e.g. limited to 1 μA). Establishing 1 μA current limits in FETs 428 and 432 may require about 5 μA through reference current FETs 408 and 410, due to the 1:5 size ratio of the exemplary corresponding devices. Equal magnitudes for source and sink current limits may reduce undesirable harmonic generation. Any other appropriate techniques for creating current limited drive circuits may be employed in the alternative, such as using low-conductivity FETs or resistors, etc., to restrain either or both of the source and sink drive capability of such drive circuit.


Additional circuitry, shown connected by phantom lines to the P-gate and N-gate references 412 and 414, represents optional additional current-limited inverter circuits that may be coupled to the same current reference voltages 412 and 414.



FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a ring oscillator 500, which will be referred to as a “current-starved” ring oscillator operating with an exemplary period of 1 μS. Inverters 502, 504 and 506 may be equivalent to the inverter 416 as shown in FIG. 4. Each limits current from a source supply connection Vin+ 402 by means of a source current limit 508, 510 and 512, respectively, which may be equivalent to the source current limit 426 shown in FIG. 4. Each inverter also limits current from a sink supply connection common reference 404 by means of a sink current limit 514, 516 or 518, respectively, each of which may be equivalent to the sink current limit 430 of FIG. 4. Output transition rates (dv/dt) for the inverting drive circuit 502 are actively limited by a capacitor 520 (e.g., 90 ff) coupled to its output node, in conjunction with the “current starving” effect of the source and sink current limits 508 and 514, respectively. Similarly, dv/dt of the output node of the inverting drive circuit 504 is also actively limited by a capacitor 522 (e.g., 90 ff) coupled thereto, in conjunction with the current drive limit devices 510 and 516 of the inverting drive circuit 504.


Output transition dv/dt of CLK output 524 of the driver circuit 506 is actively limited by the source and sink current limits 512 and 518, in conjunction with the combined distributed capacitance of each driven device, which is represented by phantom capacitor 526. A discrete capacitor may, of course, be added if appropriate. The devices that constrain dv/dt on the input node of driver circuit 506 also limit dv/dt of the CLK output 524. Series connection of the three inverting driver circuits 502, 504, and 506, creates a ring oscillator. The current-starved ring oscillator 500 is an example of a charge pump clock generating circuit that includes circuits to reduce switching speeds of substantially all driver circuits within the clock generator. The current-starved ring oscillator 500 is also an exemplary circuit for producing a charge pump clock output 524 for which dv/dt is actively limited in both negative and positive transitions. Voltage of the CLK output 524 may oscillate substantially rail-to-rail (e.g., between 0 to Vin+) with low dv/dt transitions, and may have a significantly sine-like shape.



FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a charge pump that may employ a single phase of a limited dv/dt clock, such as the output CLK 524 of the clock generator 500 shown in FIG. 5. In an exemplary embodiment, Vin+ is +3V with respect to ground (common reference), while Vo− is −3V. P-channel MOSFETs 602 and 604 (W 20, L 0.8) conduct during a charge phase, connecting a fly capacitor 606 (e.g., 10 pf) to the source supply via connections Vin+ 402 and common reference 404. At a later time, during a discharge period, the FETs 602 and 604 will be off (nonconducting), and N-channel FETs 608 (W 20, L 0.8) and 610 (W 5, L 0.8) will conduct, connecting the fly capacitor 606 between a common reference plus side, and an intermediate output stored on a storage capacitor 614.


During this discharge period, the N-channel FET 608 couples one terminal of the fly capacitor 606 to a common reference (404) connection of the output supply. Concurrently, the N-channel FET 610 couples the opposite terminal of the fly capacitor 606 to the connection of the output supply (the junction of FET 610 and capacitor 614) that is opposite to the common reference connection of the output supply. The area of the device 610 is made much smaller (e.g., half as large, or less—one fourth as large in the exemplary embodiment) than the area of the device 608. The smaller size helps to reduce noise injection into the output, for example by minimizing coupling of control signals through the gate capacitance of the FET 610. For a typical FET, the device area is simply the length times the width. If other processing parameters are constant, a control node AC impedance (to conducting control signals into the switch) will vary approximately inversely with such area. However, control signal AC coupling impedance may be increased in other ways, for example by reducing the parasitic gate-body capacitance through increases in the dielectric thickness or reduction in the dielectric constant. Thus, the device 610 may be configured in various ways to have at least twice the control node AC impedance of the device 608.


The voltage on storage capacitor 614 is filtered, by means of a resistor 616 and filter capacitor 618, to provide a filtered output supply voltage Vo− with respect to common reference 404. The exemplary embodiment provides a quiet output but relatively low current capacity. The skilled person will readily adjust the current capacity of a circuit such as that of FIG. 6, for example by employing small (to zero) values for the resistor 616, or by replacing resistor 616 with a primarily inductive impedance. Larger devices may also be employed for any or all of FETs 602, 604, 608 and 610, as well as a larger fly capacitor 606.


Each of the FETs 602, 604, 608 and 610 is an example of an actively controllable transfer capacitor coupling switch (“TCCS”). First, each is disposed in series to couple a node of the transfer capacitor to the source supply (for charging switches) or to the output supply (for discharging switches). Second, the conductivity of each is actively controllable, under control of a signal applied to a control node of the switch (here, the gate of the FET). Such a control node has a significant impedance to primary conducting connections (here, the source and drain connections).


As shown in FIG. 6, the gate (control node) of each TCCS 602, 604, 608 and 610 may be capacitively coupled to the appropriate clock signal by means of a corresponding coupling capacitor in conjunction with a bias resistor. Direct coupling could be employed by use of appropriate level shifting and isolation considerations. For the FETs 602, 604 and 608, capacitive coupling is effected by means of capacitors (e.g., 1 pf) 618, 620 and 622, respectively, together with resistors (e.g., 10 MΩ) 626, 628 and 630, respectively.


In the case of a FET 610, the coupling is effected by two coupling circuits connected in series to reduce voltage stresses. Thus, a capacitor 636 (e.g., 2 pf) couples the CLK 524 to an intermediate node where it is biased by a resistor 638 (e.g., 10 MΩ) to an intermediate average voltage level (common reference voltage, in this case). From this intermediate node the charge pump clock output signal is coupled via a capacitor 624 (e.g., 2 pf) to the gate of the FET 610, and biased by a resistor 632 (e.g., 10 MΩ) to the source voltage of the FET. The modified capacitive coupling circuit for the FET 610 provides an example of a modified circuit that differs in some regard, but functions substantially equivalently, to another. Any circuit illustrated or described herein may be replaced (as needed) by such a modified circuit, if substantially the same function is performed. Extended voltage capacity circuits, such as series or cascode-coupled transistors or the series capacitors described above, and increased current capacity circuits, such as parallel combinations of transistors, are examples of such equivalent circuits that may be employed, in place of any illustrated circuit, to satisfy particular design goals.


In the exemplary circuit, N-channel switches such as FETs 608 and 610 are switched on concurrently while P-channel switches such as FETs 602 and 604 are off, and the converse is also true. The gate threshold voltage of N-channel switches is positive (e.g., conductive for Vgs>0.5V), while the gate threshold voltage of P-channel switches is negative (e.g., conductive for Vgs<−0.25V). The active limitation of the dv/dt of transitions of CLK 524 therefore creates a period of time when all switches are off (i.e., the duration of the transition from [average of CLK 524 −0.25] to [average of CLK 524 +0.5V]. Single-phase clock drive of a charge pump may be effected using different types of switches that have correspondingly different control voltage thresholds. However, bias voltages may need to be adjusted accordingly to avoid simultaneous conduction of devices, such as FETs 602 and 608, that are disposed in series across a supply. The circuits and devices of FIG. 6 provide a convenient approach for driving all actively controllable TCCSs of a charge pump from a single clock phase (e.g., CLK 524), while ensuring that conduction periods for series fly capacitor coupling switches do not inadvertently overlap.


Each capacitive gate drive circuit shown in FIG. 6 has a time constant τ which may be expressed in terms of drive periods as R*C/(clock drive period). In the exemplary circuit of FIG. 6, τ is approximately 10 periods, because the switch drive signal CLK 524 has a period of about 1 μS. However, in many circumstances τ may be varied widely without unduly affecting operation of the circuit. τ may be enlarged as much as desired, though this may adversely affect device area. In some circumstances, τ may also be reduced, and allowed to range for example down to 5 periods, to 2 periods, to 1 period, or even to 0.1 period or less without unduly impairing performance Such reduction of τ may reduce the amplitude of the gate drive applied to the corresponding MOSFET, particularly if it is accomplished by reducing the size of the coupling capacitor (e.g., 618, 620, 622 or 624). This is due in part to capacitive voltage division between the coupling capacitor and the MOSFET gate capacitance. Such voltage division may reduce the magnitude of the control node voltage (Vgs), and hence may reduce conductivity of the switches when they are nominally enabled. Reducing τ may also reduce the proportion of time within each cycle during which the corresponding switch is turned on, which may in turn increase ripple voltages and/or load current capacity. The wide range from which τ may otherwise be chosen may be limited by such engineering considerations.


Alternative Charge Pump Embodiments

Charge pumps are extremely versatile, and aspects of the charge pump method and apparatus herein may be employed in virtually any charge pump configuration. Some alternative techniques are set forth below, each of which may be implemented using aspects of the method and apparatus described herein.



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a charge pump that generates a negative voltage Vo− 710, and provides an example of using passive transfer capacitor coupling switches. A clock source CLK 524 is provided, which may be generated, for example, by the circuit of FIG. 5. A transfer capacitor 702 charges via the clock source and via a passive switch 704 when CLK 524 is at a maximum value. When CLK 524 is at a minimum value, the transfer capacitor 702 discharges via the clock sink and a passive switch 706.


Passive switch 704 may be an N-channel enhancement MOSFET connected drain to gate and having a low threshold voltage of about 0.5V, or may be a diode (anode to capacitor 702, cathode to ground), for example a low-voltage Schottky diode. Passive switch 706 may similarly be a diode-connected N-channel enhancement FET, or may be a discrete diode with anode to output capacitor 708, cathode to transfer capacitor 702. The dv/dt control of the drive CLK 524 effects quiet operation. However, there is some loss of efficiency and voltage output due to the non-zero forward conduction voltage of the devices 704 and 706. Thus, if CLK 524 is 3V p-p (e.g., oscillates between +3V and common), then Vo− 710 may be only about −2.5V, even at light loads.


Passive switches similar to devices 704 or 706 may be substituted in place of one or more active switches in many designs described herein, simplifying design but typically reducing output voltage. For example, in FIG. 6, either or both of the active switches 604 and 610, together with their associated drive coupling circuitry, may be replaced by passive devices similar to devices 704 or 706. Passive switches are controlled by a charge pump clock output, but not via a control node. Rather, connections to primary conduction nodes of such switches are driven, through circuit operation controlled by a charge pump clock output, to voltage levels at which the devices passively switch on or off.



FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of an active p-switch 800 and of an active n-switch 830. Each is driven by a clock CLK 802. The p-switch 800, when “on,” connects an external supply (e.g., V+ 804) to a fly capacitor for a charge pump, represented by Cp 806. The n-switch 830, when “on,” connects a charge pump fly capacitor (or transfer capacitor), represented by Cp 814, to a supply connection such as V− 816. The p-switch 800 couples CLK 802 to the gate of a P-channel MOSFET 808 via a coupling capacitor 812 and a bias resistor 810. With the bias resistor 810 connected to the source of the FET 808, it is preferable that the FET 808 has a small negative threshold voltage (e.g., −0.25V). For the n-switch 830, the gate of an N-channel MOSFET 818 is coupled to CLK 802 via a coupling capacitor 822, with a bias resistor 820 setting the average Vgs to zero volts. In this circumstance, it is preferred that the threshold voltage for the FET 818 has a small positive value (e.g. 0.5V). Depending upon voltage levels, these switches 800 and 830 may employ series capacitive coupling circuits, and/or cascode or other extended-capability circuit equivalents. The effective τ of each capacitive coupling circuit may be set in accordance with the operating frequency of a charge pump in which it is used, ranging from 10 clock periods or more down to 0.1 clock periods or less, as described with respect to FIG. 6. The τ of the capacitive coupling circuit within each n-switch and p-switch operating within a single charge pump under control of the same clock (e.g., CLK 524) may have substantially the same value. P-switches 800 and n-switches 830 may have different thresholds while operating from a common clock signal, provided that the bias voltage is set properly to ensure that a p-switch and an n-switch connected in series across a supply are precluded from concurrent conduction.



FIG. 9 is a block schematic diagram that illustrates “stacking” charge pump circuits to obtain higher or lower output voltages. Each switch 800 and 830 may be as illustrated in FIG. 8, or as discussed in the text describing FIG. 8. The circuit of FIG. 9 may be configured as either a voltage tripler, or a voltage quadrupler, as follows: Va 904 may be connected to a positive source voltage Vs+, and Vb 906 may be connected to a common reference voltage (ground). Vc 908 may also be coupled to Vs+. Operation of the n-switches and the p-switches connected to a transfer capacitor 902 will cause Vd 910 to be driven to 2*Vs+. Ve 914 may be connected to Vd 910, and Vf 916 may be connected to ground. With those connections, an output voltage Vh 920 will be driven to approximately 3*Vs+ by means of fly capacitor 912 if Vg 918 is connected to Vs+. However, the output voltage Vh 920 will be driven to approximately 4*Vs+ if Vg 918 is connected, instead, to Vd 910. A storage capacitor, though not shown, is generally provided somewhere to store and smooth each of the voltages Va 904, Vc 908, Vd 910, Ve 914, Vg 918 and Vh 920.


The circuit of FIG. 9 may also be configured to produce negative voltages. Vh 920 may be connected to a positive source voltage Vs+, while Vg 918 and Ve 914 are connected to a reference (ground) voltage, to produce −(Vs+) at Vf 916. Vc 908 and Va 904 may be connected to Vf 916. An output Vb 906 will be approximately −2*Vs+ if Vd 910 is connected to ground. If, instead, Vd 910 is connected to Vs+, then Vd 910 will be driven to approximately −3*Vs+. Capacitive storage, not shown, is assumed for each supply and intermediate voltage.


In FIG. 9, all of the p-switches 800 and all of the n-switches 830 may be controlled by a single phase of a clock, such as CLK 524 of FIG. 5. Alternatively, a single phase of a first clock may control the switches connected to the fly capacitor 912 (i.e., the switches of a charge pump section 922), while a single phase of a different second clock may control the switches connected to the fly capacitor 902 (i.e., the switches of a charge pump section 924). If the clocks for charge pump sections 922 and 924 are inverted from one another, then the charge pump sections may be disposed in parallel to create a push-pull charge pump. That is, Va 904 may be connected to Ve 914, Vb 906 to Vf 916, Vc 908 to Vg 918, and Vd 910 to Vh 920. Such a push-pull charge pump may, for example, provide lower ripple voltage and higher output current capabilities.


Additionally, in circuits otherwise comporting with FIG. 9, one or more passive switches (such as switches 704 or 706 in FIG. 7) may replace switches in FIG. 9 that are shown (in FIG. 8) to be controlled by a charge pump clock output signal coupled to a control node of the switch. For example, the p-switch connected to Vg 918 and/or the n-switch connected to Vf 916 may be replaced by a passive switch, or by a diode. Similar substitutions may be made for the switches connected to Vc 908 and/or to Vb 906.


Moreover, if Vd 910 and Va 904 are equivalent to Vin+ 402 and common reference 404 of FIG. 5, then the left side of the transfer capacitor 902 may be coupled directly to a charge pump clock output such as 524, which would omit the left-side switches of the pump section 924 in FIG. 9. The left-side switches of section 922 of FIG. 9 may be omitted under analogous circumstances, with the left side of the transfer capacitor 912 coupled directly to a charge pump clock output instead. In such a configuration, transfer capacitor charging current and discharging current may be limited not only by a drive signal (such as that on capacitor 522 in FIG. 5) that has a limited dv/dt, but further or alternately by a current limiting device such as 512 or 518.



FIG. 10 is a simplified schematic diagram that illustrates generation of arbitrary voltages by means of charge pump techniques. A source voltage Vs+ 1002 may be used to derive an intermediate voltage, for example by means of resistors 1004 and 1006. Such intermediate voltage may optionally be buffered, if significant current output is desired, by means of buffer amplifier 1008, or may at least be connected to ground via a decoupling capacitor (not shown), to produce a projection voltage 1010 (with respect to common, or ground). The projection voltage 1010 may be regulated, for example by means of feedback (not shown) applied to amplifier 1008. P-switches 800 and n-switches 830 may be employed in conjunction with a fly capacitor 1012, as shown. Vb may be an available voltage source (e.g., Vs+). Operation of the circuit will establish Va 1014 at a voltage approximately equal to that of Vb 1017 plus the projection voltage 1010. The skilled person will readily see that rearrangement of the circuit will permit generation of arbitrary negative voltages with equal simplicity. Larger voltages may be obtained by stacking charge pump circuits, in a manner as described with respect to FIG. 9. Thus, arbitrary positive or negative voltages may be generated by means of charge pump circuits. All such charge pump circuits may be controlled by a single phase of a clock. Of course, the switches associated with different fly capacitors may alternatively use different clocks for control. Active switches may also be replaced with passive switches, for example in a manner as described with respect to FIG. 7 or FIG. 9.


Innumerable alternative embodiments of the charge pumps described above are possible. Any clock generator may be employed. It is desirable that the clock generator avoid introducing high di/dt noise on the supply, as can be achieved with many analog designs (for example, as shown in FIG. 5) and some digital designs. It is desirable that dv/dt of the clock drive signals be limited, both to help limit control node signal injection, and also to help limit (in conjunction with the transconductance of the relevant switch) the resulting di/dt of charging and discharging currents. It may be desirable to capacitively couple a charge pump clock to a control node of a transfer capacitor switch, for example in order to simplify control of control-node voltage levels. It may be desirable to utilize a single-phase clock output to control many, or all, of the transfer capacitor active switches within a charge pump, to minimize circuit complexity. Any of these desirable features may be effected independently, or in combination with any of the other desirable features, or in combination with any other feature described herein. Thus, the skilled person may apply aspects of the method and apparatus described herein to a staggering variety of charge pump configurations.


CONCLUSION

The foregoing description illustrates exemplary implementations, and novel features, of aspects of a charge pump method and apparatus for generating new voltages in circuits. The skilled person will understand that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the methods and apparatus illustrated may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Numerous alternative implementations have been described, but it is impractical to list all embodiments explicitly. As such, each practical combination of apparatus and method alternatives that are set forth above or shown in the attached figures, and each practical combination of equivalents of such apparatus and method alternatives, constitutes a distinct alternative embodiment of the subject apparatus or methods. For example, a charge pump having a plural transfer capacitor (or ‘stacked’) architecture as shown in FIG. 9, having at least one passive switch as shown in FIG. 7, and having a settable voltage source as shown in FIG. 10, constitutes an embodiment of the subject apparatus, as do all other such practical combinations of subfeatures. Therefore, the scope of the presented invention should be determined only by reference to the appended claims, and is not to be limited by features illustrated in the foregoing description except insofar as such limitation is recited in an appended claim.


All variations coming within the meaning and range of equivalency of the various claim elements are embraced within the scope of the corresponding claim. Each claim set forth below is intended to encompass any system or method that differs only insubstantially from the literal language of such claim, as long as such system or method is not, in fact, an embodiment of the prior art. To this end, each described element in each claim should be construed as broadly as possible, and moreover should be understood to encompass any equivalent to such element insofar as possible without also encompassing the prior art.

Claims
  • 1. A charge pump clock generating circuit configured to generate a clock signal for a capacitive charge pump comprising at least one transfer capacitor having an input terminal and an output terminal, and a plurality of transfer capacitor coupling switches, each coupled to the clock signal and to one of the input terminal or output terminal of a corresponding one of the at least one transfer capacitor, each transfer capacitor coupling switch being switchable between a conducting state and a non-conducting state under control of the coupled clock signal, the charge pump clock generating circuit including: (a) a ring oscillator comprising an odd number of inverting driver sections configured to output the clock signal; and(b) active limiting circuitry associated with each driver section, the active limiting circuitry including a source current limit circuit coupled between a first voltage source and the associated driver section and configured to limit the current source capability of the associated driver section, and a sink current limit circuit coupled between the associated driver section and a common reference voltage and configured to limit the current sink capability of the associated driver section, wherein the active limiting circuitry limits output transitions dv/dt of the clock signal and reduces switching speeds of substantially all of the driver sections; wherein the plurality of transfer capacitor coupling switches are controlled by the coupled clock signal so as to couple the input terminal of the corresponding transfer capacitor to a second voltage source during periodic first times, and to couple the output terminal of the corresponding transfer capacitor to a voltage output terminal during periodic second times that are not concurrent with the periodic first times, andwherein the charge pump clock generating circuit is configured such that the limited output transitions dv/dt of the clock signal create periods of time that cause all transfer capacitor coupling switches coupled to a corresponding transfer capacitor to be in the non-conducting state.
  • 2. The invention of claim 1, wherein at least a first of the plurality of transfer capacitor coupling switches has a first gate threshold voltage and at least a second of the plurality of transfer capacitor coupling switches has a second gate threshold voltage different from the first gate threshold voltage, and wherein the clock signal during the periods of time has a voltage between the first gate threshold voltage and the second gate threshold voltage such that the at least first of the plurality of transfer capacitor coupling switches and the at least second of the plurality of transfer capacitor coupling switches are in the non-conducting state.
  • 3. The invention of claim 1, wherein the active current limiting circuitry for each driver section includes a capacitance coupled between the output of the driver section and the common reference.
  • 4. The invention of claim 1, wherein the charge pump clock generating circuit further includes a discrete capacitive element coupled to the output of the last driver section and configured to limit output transitions dv/dt of the clock signal.
  • 5. The invention of claim 1, wherein the clock signal is a single-phase clock signal.
  • 6. The invention of claim 1, wherein the ring oscillator comprises three inverting driver sections.
  • 7. The invention of claim 1, wherein the source current limit circuit and sink current limit circuit are configured to limit the current source capability and the current sink capability to a substantially identical magnitude.
  • 8. The invention of claim 1, wherein undesirable harmonic generation is reduced by a configuration of the source current limit circuit and of the sink current limit circuit that limits the current source capability and the current sink capability to a substantially identical magnitude.
  • 9. The invention of claim 1, wherein the charge pump clock generating circuit is embodied within a monolithic integrated circuit.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS—CLAIMS OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 16/169,831, filed Oct. 24, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,608,617, issued Mar. 31, 2020; which is a continuation of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 14/883,525, filed Oct. 14, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,148,255, issued Dec. 4, 2018; which is a continuation of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 13/769,780, filed Feb. 18, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,190,902, issued Nov. 17, 2015; which is a continuation and claims the benefit of priority under 35 USC § 120 of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 12/799,583, filed Apr. 27, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,736, issued Feb. 19, 2013; which application Ser. No. 12/799,583 is a divisional application of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/658,154, filed Sep. 8, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,719,343, issued May 18, 2010; and the contents of all of the patent applications and issued patents set forth above are hereby incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in full.

US Referenced Citations (395)
Number Name Date Kind
3470443 Berry et al. Sep 1969 A
3646361 Pfiffner Feb 1972 A
3731112 Smith May 1973 A
3878450 Greatbatch Apr 1975 A
3942047 Buchanan Mar 1976 A
3943428 Whidden Mar 1976 A
3955353 Astle May 1976 A
3975671 Stoll Aug 1976 A
3995228 Pass et al. Nov 1976 A
4047091 Hutchines et al. Sep 1977 A
4061929 Asano Dec 1977 A
4068295 Portmann Jan 1978 A
4106086 Holbrook et al. Aug 1978 A
4186436 Ishiwatari Jan 1980 A
4316101 Minner Feb 1982 A
4321661 Sane Mar 1982 A
4344050 Callahan Aug 1982 A
4374357 Olesin et al. Feb 1983 A
4388537 Kanuma Jun 1983 A
4390798 Kurafuji Jun 1983 A
4460952 Risinger Jul 1984 A
RE31749 Yamashiro Nov 1984 E
4485433 Topich Nov 1984 A
4575644 Leslie Mar 1986 A
4621315 Vaughn et al. Nov 1986 A
4633106 Backes et al. Dec 1986 A
4638184 Kimura Jan 1987 A
4679134 Bingham Jul 1987 A
4703196 Arakawa Oct 1987 A
4736169 Weaver et al. Apr 1988 A
4739191 Puar Apr 1988 A
4746960 Valeri et al. May 1988 A
4752699 Cranford, Jr. et al. Jun 1988 A
4769784 Doluca et al. Sep 1988 A
4777577 Bingham et al. Oct 1988 A
4797899 Fuller Jan 1989 A
4839787 Kojima et al. Jun 1989 A
4847519 Wahl et al. Jul 1989 A
4891609 Eilley Jan 1990 A
4897774 Bingham et al. Jan 1990 A
4918336 Graham et al. Apr 1990 A
5023465 Douglas et al. Jun 1991 A
5023494 Tsukii et al. Jun 1991 A
5029282 Ito Jul 1991 A
5032799 Milberger et al. Jul 1991 A
5036229 Tran Jul 1991 A
5038325 Douglas et al. Aug 1991 A
5061907 Rasmussen Oct 1991 A
5068626 Takagi et al. Nov 1991 A
5075572 Poteet et al. Dec 1991 A
5093586 Asari Mar 1992 A
5111375 Marshall Mar 1992 A
5124571 Gillingham et al. Jun 1992 A
5126590 Chem Jun 1992 A
5138190 Yamazaki et al. Aug 1992 A
5146178 Nojima et al. Sep 1992 A
5081371 Wong Nov 1992 A
5180928 Choi Jan 1993 A
5182529 Chern Jan 1993 A
5193198 Yokouchi Mar 1993 A
5196996 Oh Mar 1993 A
5208557 Kersh May 1993 A
5212456 Kovalcik et al. May 1993 A
5216588 Bajwa et al. Jun 1993 A
5274343 Russell et al. Dec 1993 A
5289137 Nodar et al. Feb 1994 A
5306954 Chan et al. Apr 1994 A
5317181 Tyson May 1994 A
5349306 Apel Sep 1994 A
5392186 Alexander et al. Feb 1995 A
5392205 Zavaleta Feb 1995 A
5394372 Tanaka et al. Feb 1995 A
5408140 Kawai et al. Apr 1995 A
5418499 Nakao May 1995 A
5422586 Tedrow et al. Jun 1995 A
5446418 Hara et al. Aug 1995 A
5455794 Javanifard et al. Oct 1995 A
5465061 Dufour Nov 1995 A
5483434 Seesink Jan 1996 A
5493249 Manning Feb 1996 A
5519360 Keeth May 1996 A
5535160 Yamaguchi Jul 1996 A
5546031 Seesink Aug 1996 A
5553021 Kubono et al. Sep 1996 A
5554892 Norimatsu Sep 1996 A
5589793 Kassapian Dec 1996 A
5600281 Mori et al. Feb 1997 A
5670907 Gorecki et al. Sep 1997 A
5672992 Nadd Sep 1997 A
5677649 Martin Oct 1997 A
5677650 Kwasniewski et al. Oct 1997 A
5689213 Sher Nov 1997 A
5694308 Cave Dec 1997 A
5698877 Gonzalez Dec 1997 A
5729039 Beyer et al. Mar 1998 A
5734291 Tasdighi Mar 1998 A
5757170 Pinney May 1998 A
5774404 Eto Jun 1998 A
5786617 Merrill et al. Jul 1998 A
5793246 Vest et al. Aug 1998 A
5808505 Tsukada Sep 1998 A
5812939 Kohama Sep 1998 A
5818289 Chevallier et al. Oct 1998 A
5818766 Song Oct 1998 A
5864328 Kajimoto Jan 1999 A
5874849 Marotta et al. Feb 1999 A
5878331 Yamamoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5889428 Young Mar 1999 A
5892400 van Saders et al. Apr 1999 A
5917362 Kohama Jun 1999 A
5945867 Uda et al. Aug 1999 A
5945879 Rodwell et al. Aug 1999 A
5959335 Bryant et al. Sep 1999 A
5969571 Swanson Oct 1999 A
5969988 Tanzawa et al. Oct 1999 A
5986649 Yamazaki Nov 1999 A
6020781 Fujioka Feb 2000 A
6020848 Wallace et al. Feb 2000 A
6064253 Faulkner et al. May 2000 A
6064275 Yamauchi May 2000 A
6064872 Vice May 2000 A
6081165 Goldman Jun 2000 A
6094103 Jeong et al. Jul 2000 A
6107885 Miguelez et al. Aug 2000 A
6122185 Utsunomiya Sep 2000 A
6130572 Ghilardelli et al. Oct 2000 A
6137367 Ezzedine et al. Oct 2000 A
6169444 Thurber Jan 2001 B1
6188590 Chang et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195307 Umezawa et al. Feb 2001 B1
RE37124 Monk et al. Apr 2001 E
6223990 Kamei May 2001 B1
6226206 Maeda May 2001 B1
6249446 Shearon et al. Jun 2001 B1
6275096 Hsu Aug 2001 B1
6297687 Sugimura Oct 2001 B1
6308047 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2001 B1
6337594 Hwang Jan 2002 B1
6339349 Rajagopalan Jan 2002 B1
6356062 Elmhurst et al. Mar 2002 B1
6400211 Yokomizo Jun 2002 B1
6411531 Nork et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414863 Bayer et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424585 Ooishi Jul 2002 B1
6429632 Forbes et al. Aug 2002 B1
6429723 Hastings Aug 2002 B1
6429732 Tedrow et al. Aug 2002 B1
6452232 Adan Sep 2002 B1
6486728 Kleveland Nov 2002 B2
6486729 Imamiya Nov 2002 B2
6496074 Sowlati Dec 2002 B1
6504213 Ebina Jan 2003 B1
6518829 Butler Feb 2003 B2
6535071 Forbes Mar 2003 B2
6537861 Kroell et al. Mar 2003 B1
6559689 Clark May 2003 B1
6560164 Kawai May 2003 B2
6563366 Kohama May 2003 B1
6617933 Ito Sep 2003 B2
6653697 Hidaka et al. Nov 2003 B2
6661682 Kim Dec 2003 B2
6661683 Botker Dec 2003 B2
6664861 Murakami Dec 2003 B2
6677641 Kocon Jan 2004 B2
6714065 Komiya et al. Mar 2004 B2
6717458 Potanin Apr 2004 B1
6737926 Forbes May 2004 B2
6744224 Ishii Jun 2004 B2
6784737 Martin et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788130 Pauletti et al. Sep 2004 B2
6788578 Tang Sep 2004 B1
6794927 Bedarida et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801076 Merritt Oct 2004 B1
6803807 Fujiyama et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806761 Aude Oct 2004 B1
6809603 Ho Oct 2004 B1
6812775 Seo Nov 2004 B2
6816000 Miyamitsu Nov 2004 B2
6816001 Khouri et al. Nov 2004 B2
6816016 Sander et al. Nov 2004 B2
6819187 Ming et al. Nov 2004 B1
6819938 Sahota Nov 2004 B2
6825699 Marshall et al. Nov 2004 B2
6825730 Sun Nov 2004 B1
6828614 Gonzalez Dec 2004 B2
6831499 Oddone et al. Dec 2004 B2
6831847 Perry Dec 2004 B2
6833745 Hausmann et al. Dec 2004 B2
6833752 Merritt et al. Dec 2004 B2
6836173 Yang Dec 2004 B1
6836176 Zeng et al. Dec 2004 B2
6844762 Sanchez Jan 2005 B2
6847251 Kao et al. Jan 2005 B2
6853566 Itoh Feb 2005 B2
6855655 Wagner et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856177 de Frutos et al. Feb 2005 B1
6871059 Piro et al. Mar 2005 B1
6879502 Yoshida et al. Apr 2005 B2
6891234 Connelly et al. May 2005 B1
6897708 Hamasako May 2005 B2
6906575 Tanaka Jun 2005 B2
6947720 Razavi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6954623 Chang et al. Oct 2005 B2
6967523 DeMone Nov 2005 B2
6968020 Jayaraman Nov 2005 B1
7023260 Thorp et al. Apr 2006 B2
7042245 Hidaka May 2006 B2
7068096 Chu Jun 2006 B2
7068114 Nishiyama Jun 2006 B2
7102449 Mohan Sep 2006 B1
7109532 Lee et al. Sep 2006 B1
7123898 Burgener et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126595 Yanagi Oct 2006 B2
7129796 Goto Oct 2006 B2
7161197 Nakatsuka et al. Jan 2007 B2
7180794 Matsue Feb 2007 B2
7202712 Athas Apr 2007 B2
7212788 Weber et al. May 2007 B2
7256642 Kimura Aug 2007 B2
7355455 Hidaka Apr 2008 B2
7359677 Huang et al. Apr 2008 B2
7382176 Ayres et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391282 Nakatsuka et al. Jun 2008 B2
7430133 McIntyre et al. Sep 2008 B1
7457594 Theobold et al. Nov 2008 B2
7460852 Burgener et al. Dec 2008 B2
7486128 Yen et al. Feb 2009 B2
7515882 Kelcourse et al. Apr 2009 B2
7532061 Ragone et al. May 2009 B2
7546089 Bellantoni Jun 2009 B2
7551036 Berroth et al. Jun 2009 B2
7560977 Miyazaki et al. Jul 2009 B2
7570104 Hsu Aug 2009 B2
7649403 Lee et al. Jan 2010 B2
7659152 Gonzalez et al. Feb 2010 B2
7667529 Consuelo et al. Feb 2010 B2
7719343 Burgener May 2010 B2
7724070 Fukami May 2010 B2
7724072 Baek et al. May 2010 B2
7733156 Brederlow et al. Jun 2010 B2
7733157 Brederlow et al. Jun 2010 B2
7741869 Hidaka Jun 2010 B2
7756494 Fujioka et al. Jul 2010 B2
7786807 Li et al. Aug 2010 B1
7796969 Kelly et al. Sep 2010 B2
7817966 Prikhodko et al. Oct 2010 B2
7860499 Burgener et al. Dec 2010 B2
7868683 Ilkov Jan 2011 B2
7910993 Brindle et al. Mar 2011 B2
7928759 Hidaka Apr 2011 B2
7928796 Namekawa Apr 2011 B2
7936213 Shin et al. May 2011 B2
7944277 Sinitsky et al. May 2011 B1
7956675 Saitoh et al. Jun 2011 B2
7969235 Pan Jun 2011 B2
7982265 Challa et al. Jul 2011 B2
8040175 Raghavan Oct 2011 B2
8067977 Joo Nov 2011 B2
8072258 Yamahira Dec 2011 B2
8103226 Andrys et al. Jan 2012 B2
8131251 Burgener et al. Mar 2012 B2
8195103 Waheed et al. Jun 2012 B2
8253494 Biednov Aug 2012 B2
8339185 Cazzaniga et al. Dec 2012 B2
8378736 Burgener Feb 2013 B2
8497670 Molin et al. Jul 2013 B1
8559907 Burgener et al. Oct 2013 B2
8649741 Iijima et al. Feb 2014 B2
8649754 Burgener et al. Feb 2014 B2
8674749 Tran et al. Mar 2014 B2
8686787 Swonger Apr 2014 B2
8816659 Kim et al. Aug 2014 B2
8954902 Stuber et al. Feb 2015 B2
8994452 Kim et al. Mar 2015 B2
8995154 Kaneda Mar 2015 B2
9030248 Kim et al. May 2015 B2
9087899 Brindle et al. Jul 2015 B2
9106072 Khatri Aug 2015 B2
9154027 Huynh et al. Oct 2015 B2
9190902 Burgener Nov 2015 B2
9225378 Burgener et al. Dec 2015 B2
9252651 Mott Feb 2016 B2
9264053 Englekirk Feb 2016 B2
9276526 Nobbe Mar 2016 B2
9312822 Knopik Apr 2016 B2
9312909 Kang et al. Apr 2016 B2
9354654 Swonger May 2016 B2
9369087 Burgener et al. Jun 2016 B2
9385669 Banerjee Jul 2016 B2
9397656 Dribinsky et al. Jul 2016 B2
9413362 Englekirk Aug 2016 B2
9419560 Korol Aug 2016 B2
9429969 Kim et al. Aug 2016 B2
9531413 Sun et al. Dec 2016 B2
9577626 Crandall Feb 2017 B2
9584097 Bakalski Feb 2017 B2
9590614 Cebi Mar 2017 B2
9654094 Ishimaru et al. May 2017 B2
9660590 Kim et al. May 2017 B2
9680416 Burgener et al. Jun 2017 B2
9685963 Englekirk Jun 2017 B2
9768683 Englekirk Sep 2017 B2
9778669 Kim et al. Oct 2017 B2
9793795 Englekirk Oct 2017 B2
9871512 Ho Jan 2018 B2
9882531 Willard Jan 2018 B1
9948252 Adamski Apr 2018 B1
9966988 Burgener et al. May 2018 B2
9998002 Englekirk Jun 2018 B2
10097171 Li Oct 2018 B2
10148255 Burgener Dec 2018 B2
10236872 Willard et al. Mar 2019 B1
10243519 Dykstra Mar 2019 B2
10250131 Kim et al. Apr 2019 B2
10587229 Costa Mar 2020 B1
10608617 Burgener Mar 2020 B2
20010031518 Kim et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020079971 Vathulya Jun 2002 A1
20020115244 Park et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020140412 Maneatis Oct 2002 A1
20020153940 Wurcer et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030002452 Sahota Jan 2003 A1
20030141543 Bryant et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030201494 Maeda et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040061130 Morizuka Apr 2004 A1
20040080364 Sander et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040129975 Koh et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040204013 Ma et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050052220 Burgener et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050077564 Forbes Apr 2005 A1
20050121699 Chen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050122163 Chu Jun 2005 A1
20060114731 Park Jun 2006 A1
20060194558 Kelly Aug 2006 A1
20060281418 Huang et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060284670 Eid et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070018247 Brindle et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070045697 Driesch, Jr. et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070069801 Ragone et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070075784 Pettersson Apr 2007 A1
20070146064 Morie et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070279120 Brederlow et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080007980 Fujiwara Jan 2008 A1
20080044041 Tucker et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080076371 Dribinsky et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080116979 Lesso et al. May 2008 A1
20080272833 Ivanov et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298605 Fan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090066407 Bowman et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090140795 Choy Jun 2009 A1
20100033226 Kim et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100052771 Hartono Mar 2010 A1
20100110736 Gronthal et al. May 2010 A1
20100214010 Burgener et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100245327 Tsujino et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100330938 Yin Dec 2010 A1
20110156819 Kim et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110163779 Hidaka Jul 2011 A1
20110169550 Brindle et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110299437 Mikhemar et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120007679 Burgener et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120038344 Kim et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120064952 Iijima et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120139643 Scott Jun 2012 A1
20120200338 Olson Aug 2012 A1
20120242379 Obkircher et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120286854 Swonger Nov 2012 A1
20130015717 Dykstra Jan 2013 A1
20130082782 Leuschner Apr 2013 A1
20130148456 Cho et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130229841 Giuliano Sep 2013 A1
20130293280 Brindle et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130310114 Zohny Nov 2013 A1
20130320955 Kratyuk et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140028521 Bauder et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140055194 Burgener et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140085006 Mostov et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140087673 Mostov et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140179249 Burgener et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140306767 Burgener et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150002195 Englekirk Jan 2015 A1
20150002214 Englekirk Jan 2015 A1
20150084610 Kim et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150280655 Nobbe Oct 2015 A1
20160126835 Englekirk May 2016 A1
20160126906 Maxim May 2016 A1
20160179114 Kim et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191022 Burgener et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160285363 Englekirk Sep 2016 A1
20170098996 Englekirk Apr 2017 A1
20170149437 Luo May 2017 A1
20170237462 Burgener et al. Aug 2017 A1
20180046210 Kim et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180091045 Englekirk Mar 2018 A1
20200007088 Ranta Jan 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (45)
Number Date Country
102005039138 Feb 2007 DE
385641 Sep 1990 EP
0622901 Nov 1994 EP
0 938 094 Jan 1999 EP
2421132 Feb 2012 EP
1664966 Jul 2014 EP
1774620 Oct 2014 EP
2830203 Jan 2015 EP
2884586 Jun 2015 EP
2451524 Feb 2009 GB
55-75348 Jun 1980 JP
01-254014 Nov 1989 JP
04-34980 Feb 1992 JP
04-334105 Nov 1992 JP
05-111241 Apr 1993 JP
06-152334 May 1994 JP
06-314985 Nov 1994 JP
06-334506 Dec 1994 JP
08-148949 Jun 1996 JP
08-307305 Nov 1996 JP
09-161472 Jun 1997 JP
09-200021 Jul 1997 JP
10-93471 Apr 1998 JP
10-242477 Sep 1998 JP
10-242829 Sep 1998 JP
10-344247 Dec 1998 JP
11-136111 May 1999 JP
11-252900 Sep 1999 JP
2000-166220 Jun 2000 JP
2000166220 Jun 2000 JP
2001-051758 Feb 2001 JP
2001-119281 Apr 2001 JP
2001-119927 Apr 2001 JP
2002-119053 Apr 2002 JP
03-060451 Feb 2003 JP
03-198248 Jul 2003 JP
2004-147175 May 2004 JP
2005-057860 Mar 2005 JP
2006-352326 Dec 2006 JP
5675529 Jan 2015 JP
57779166 Jul 2015 JP
WO 9523460 Aug 1995 WO
WO9858382 Dec 1998 WO
2009063661 May 2009 WO
2010008586 Jan 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (238)
Entry
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 13, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 55 pgs.
Tran, Pablo No., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 15, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 26 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 15, 2015 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 83 pgs.
Kim, et al., Amendment—Response to Restriction filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 15, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 5 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action received from USPTO dated Jun. 11, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 45 pgs.
Swonger, James, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 12, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 21 pgs.
Kim, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 12, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 8 pgs.
Tokuda, Kenji, Office Action and English Translation received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Jul. 13, 2013 for related appln. No. 2011-518737, 10 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 24, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 10 pgs.
Sasaki, Satoshi, English translation of Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Jul. 23, 2013 for related appln. No. 2011-171908, 2 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Aug. 20, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 17 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N. Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Aug. 28, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 18 pgs.
Muelemans, Bart, Extended Search Report received from the EPO dated Oct. 22, 2013 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 6 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 7, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 11 pgs.
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 7, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 16 pgs.
Gentili, Luigi, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Nov. 14, 2013 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 43 pgs.
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Rule 69 EPC received from the EPO dated Nov. 25, 2013 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 2 pgs.
Mehari, Yeman, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 2, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 15 pgs.
Meulemans, Bart, Supplementary European Search Report received from the EPO dated Jan. 22, 2014 for related appln. No. E09798318, 6 pgs.
Moon, et al., “Design of a Low-Distortion 22-kHz Fifth-Order Bessel Filter”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, 28(1993) December, No. 12, New York, US, pp. 1254-1263.
Matsumoto, Yasunori, English Translation of Office Action of Japan Patent Office dated Feb. 4, 2014 for related appln. No. 2012-243547, 2 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jan. 8, 2014 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 13 pgs.
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Rules 90(2) and 70a(2) EPC received from EPO dated Feb. 14, 2014 for related appln. No. 09798318.3, 1 pg.
Gundlach, Susanne, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Feb. 14, 2014 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 44 pgs.
Sakurada, Masaki, Office Action and English translation of Japanese Office Action received from the JPO dated Mar. 4, 2014 for related appln. No. 2011-171908, 20 pgs.
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 12, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 12 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 13, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 19 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Apr. 14, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 12 pgs.
Toscano, Oliveros, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated Apr. 25, 2014 for related appln. No. 05763216.8, 47 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, English translation of Response filed in the JPO filed Apr. 28, 2014 for related appln. No. 2012-243547, 5 pgs.
Tran, Pablo, Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 8, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,680, 5 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 9, 2014 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 4 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 22, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 10 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 23, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 13 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated May 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 28 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Sep. 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 9 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 17 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 21 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jun. 8, 2016 for appln. No. 09798318.3, 14 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 10, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 20 pgs.
Kim, et al., Response to Non-Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 15 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,193, 12 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 1, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 17 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 28 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 16, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 19 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 31, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 14 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 18, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 11 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 18, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 17 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 12, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 14 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 3, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,680, 157 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas S., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 2, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 52 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 9 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/059,206, 35 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,483, 15 pgs.
Kim, et al., Response to Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 29, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/059,206, 4 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 30, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 16 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas S., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jun. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 14 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated May 10, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 10 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 21, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,483, 11 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas S., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Apr. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 15 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 18, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/059,206, 51 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Aug. 17, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,483, 20 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 18, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,007, 5 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Sep. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,007, 8 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,007, 11 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 11, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,007, 3 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas S., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 8, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,945, 12 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 10, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,945, 11 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 20, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,597, 12 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 16, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,042, 26 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas S., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 28, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,945, 9 pgs.
Aquilani, Dario, Office Action received from the EPO dated Jul. 2, 2018 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 4 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 17, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,597, 12 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 11, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,042, 12 pgs.
Gentili, Luigi, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Sep. 6, 2018 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 29 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 18 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jun. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/917,218, 12 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 1, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 21 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 19 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 25, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 5 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 16, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 25 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 18 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 17, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 13 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 10, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 22 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B.,Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 17, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 8 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 22, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 19 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jul. 5, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 22 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Aug. 30, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 13 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 10 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Preliminary Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 16 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Aug. 31, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 9 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 5, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 10 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated May 22, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 12 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 31, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 5 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Dec. 7, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,042, 17 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 20, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/143,142, 13 pgs.
Tieu, Binh Kien, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/167,389, 12 pgs.
PSemi Corporation, Preliminary Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 12, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 9 pgs.
PSemi Corporation, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 14 pgs.
PSemi Corporation, Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 9 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Nov. 9, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 31 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 12 pgs.
Swonger, James, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 1, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 8 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 3, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 9 pgs.
Meulemans, Bart, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Dec. 17, 2015 for appln. No. 09798318.3, 4 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 6 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jan. 13, 2016 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 15 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 14 pgs.
Suzuki, Shigeyuki, English translation of Office Action received from the JPO dated Feb. 2, 2016 for appln. No. 2014-260387, 3 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Amendment After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 9, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 17 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,193, 37 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas, Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 8 pgs.
Kim, et al., Response to Restriction Requirement filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 8 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 13 pgs.
Tran, Pablo, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 25, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 146 pgs.
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,193, 17 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 13 pgs.
Swonger, James, Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 4 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, English translation of a Response filed in the JPO dated Apr. 28, 2016 for appln. No. 2014-260387, 9 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu, Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 79 pgs.
Burgener, et al., “Low Noise Charge Pump Method and Apparatus”, application filed in the UPSTO, U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, filed Feb. 18, 2013, 27 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated 12/613 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 18 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 25 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 12 pgs.
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 8, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 15 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 8, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 61 pgs.
Tran, Pablo No., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 7, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 7 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response tiled in the USPTO dated Aug. 25, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 14 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response and English translation filed in the Japanese Patent Office dated Jun. 3, 2014 for related appln. No. 2011-171908, 21 pgs.
Imbernon, L., Decision to Grant a European Patent Pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC received from the EPO dated Jul. 3, 2014 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 2 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Aug. 19, 2014 for related appln. No. 09798318.3, 20 pgs.
Kim, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 14, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 3 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 20, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 5 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 10, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,680, 13 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 6, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 15 pgs.
Nguyen, Hieh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 13 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 12 pgs.
Swonger, James, Response filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 6 pgs.
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 23 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 13 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 65 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Dec. 4, 2014 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 6 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 68 pgs.
European Patent Office, Invitation pursuant to Rule 63(1) EPC received from the EPO dated Mar. 3, 2015 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 3 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response to Final Pre-RCE Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 14 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 16 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 20 pgs.
Imbernon, Lisa, Extended Search Report received from the EPO dated Jan. 8, 2015 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 6 pgs.
Matsumoto, Yasunori, English translation of Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2015 for appln. No. 2012-243547, 2 pgs.
Kim, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 13, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 3 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 5 pgs.
Swonger, James, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 9 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Apr. 29, 2015 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 7 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 13 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, English translation of a Response that was filed in the JPO dated May 12, 2015 for appln. No. 2012-243547, 4 pgs.
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 17 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jun. 12, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 17 pgs.
Swonger, James S., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 10 pgs.
Wells, Kenneth, Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Jul. 15, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 4 pgs.
Skibinski, Thomas, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jul. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 43 pgs.
Aquilani, Dario, Extended Search Report received from the EPO dated Jun. 11, 2015 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 9 pgs.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jul. 14, 2015 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 9 pgs.
Ezzeddine, et al., “The High Voltage/High Power FET (HiVP1)”, 2003 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, pp. 215-218.
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 79 pgs.
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 9 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 28, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/515,967, 96 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 24, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/891,519, 8 pgs.
Maxim Integrated Products, “Charge Pumps Shine in Portable Designs”, published Mar. 15, 2001, pp. 1-13.
Nork, Sam, “New Charge Pumps Offer Low Input and Output Noise”, Linear Technology Corporation, Design Notes, Design Note 243, Nov. 2000, pp. 1-2.
Linear Technology, “LTC1550I/LTC1551L: Low Noise Charge Pump Inverters in MS8 Shrink Cell Phone Designs”, Dec. 1998, pp. 1-2.
Lascari, Lance, “Accurate Phase Noise Prediction in PLL Synthesizers”, Applied Microwave & Wireless, May 2000, pp. 90-96.
Texas Instruments, “TPS60204, TPS60205, Regulated 3.3-V, 100-mA Low-Ripple Charge Pump, Low Power DC/DC Converters”, Feb. 2001, Revised Sep. 2001, pp. 1-18.
Imbernon, Lisa, Communication from the European Patent office for related appln. No. 048168488, dated Apr. 6, 2009, 2 pages.
Yasuike, Kazuki, English translation of an Office Action of related appln. No. 2006-525525 received from the Japanese atent Office dated Aug. 25, 2009, 3 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Dec. 1, 2004, 26 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Apr. 1, 2005, 27 pages.
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Aug. 10, 2005, 39 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment After Final filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Oct. 11, 2005, 32 pages.
Englund, Terry, Advisory Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 2, 2005, 2 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Notice of Appeal filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 10, 2005, 1 page.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Petition for Revival of Appln. and Facts Statement filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 4, 2007, 4 pgs.
Englund, Terry, Not. of Non-Compliant Appeal Brief received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 2, 2006, 2 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amended Appeal Brief filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 5, 2007, 161 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Pet. to Expedite Previous Petition filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 8, 2007, 1 pg.
McLaughlin, Kenya, Decision of Petition under 37 CFR 1.137(f) received from USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 31, 2007, 1 page.
McLaughlin, Kenya, Decision Granting received from USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Mar. 28, 2007, 1 page.
Englund, Terry, Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated May 17, 2007, 52 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment After Re-Opening Prosecution filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Sep. 17, 2007, 31 page.
Englund, Terry, Final Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Dec. 12, 2007, 52 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Not. of Appeal, Pre-Appeal Brief Req. and Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated May 12, 2008, 7 pages.
Englund, Terry, Not. of Non-Compliant Appeal Brief received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Apr. 1, 2009, 2 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amended Appeal Brief filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jun. 1, 2009, 175 pages.
Englund, Terry, Interview Summary received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Oct. 9, 2009, 3 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Stmt. of Substance of Interview filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 9, 2009, 20 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Dec. 2, 2009, 19 pages.
Englund, Terry, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 11, 2010, 22 pages.
Burgener, Mark, et al., Issue Fee Transmittal filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Mar. 23, 2010, 1 page.
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 29, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 19 pages.
Ebner von Eschenbach, Jennifer, Communication and Supplementary Search Report received from the EPO dated Nov. 27, 2009 for related appln. No, 05763216.8, 10 pages.
Kai, Tetsuo, Translation of an Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Mar. 29, 2011 for related Japanese appln. No. 2010-232563, 4 pgs.
Imbernon, Lisa, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from EPO dated May 18, 2011 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 5 pgs.
Sircus, Brian, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 10, 2011 for related application No. PCT/US2009/04149, 17 pgs.
European Patent Office, Invitation pursuant to Rule 63(1) EPC dated Aug. 19, 2011 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 3 pgs.
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 6, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 11 pgs.
Kurzbauer, Werner, Extended European Search Report received from the EPO dated Dec. 6, 2011 for related appln. No. 11175503.9, 4 pgs.
Tran, Pablo, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 3, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 46 pgs.
Fedi, Giulio, Extended Search Report received from the EPO dated Mar. 5, 2012 for related appln. No. 11154277.5, 8 pgs.
Adams, W. J., et al., “OTA Extended Adjustment Range and Linearization Via Programmable Current Mirrors”, Circuits and Systems, 1991, Proceedings of the 34th Midwest Symposium on Monterey, CA, USA 14-17 May 14, 1991.
Bogdan Pankiewicz, et al., “A Field Programmable Analog Array for CMOS Continuous-Time OTA-C Filter Applications”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Service Center, vol. 37, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2002.
Jader, et al., “A Linearly Tunable Low-Voltage CMOS Transconductor with Improved Common-Mode Stability and Its Application to gm-C Filters”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digitalsignal Processing, vol. 48, No. 7, Jul. 1, 2001.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Amendment filed in the EPO dated Mar. 5, 2012 for related appln. No. 11175503.9, 10 pgs.
Ghilini, Marie, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC received from the EPO dated May 23, 2012 for related appln. No. 11175503.9, 60 pgs.
Wang, Chi-Chang, et al., “Efficiency Improvement in Charge Pump Circuits”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 852-860.
Yamamoto, Kazuya, et al., “A 2.2-V Operation, 2.4-GHz Single-Chip GaAs MMIC Transceiver for Wireless Applications”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 502-512.
Hiramoto, Toshiro, et al., “Low Power and Low Voltage MOSFETs with Variable Threshold Voltage Controlled by Back-Bias”, IEICE Trans. Electron, vol. E83-C, No. 2, Feb. 2000, pp. 161-169.
Su, Pin, et al., “On the Body-Source Built-In Potential Lowering of SOI MOSFETs”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 24, No. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 90-92.
Yang, Min, “Sub-100nm Vertical MOSFET's with Si1-x-y GexCy Source/Drains”, a dissertation presented to the faculty of Princeton University, Jun. 2000, 272 pgs.
Ytterdal, T., et al., “MOSFET Device Physics and Operation”, Device Modeling for Analog and RF CMOS Circuit Design, 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 46 pgs.
Cherne, et al., U.S. Statutory Invention Registration, Registration No. H1435, May 2, 1995.
Ohyama, Hirohito, Translation of an Office Action of Japan Patent Office dated Aug. 7, 2012 for related appln. No. 2010-040443, 1 pg.
Lee, et al., “Analysis of Body Bias Effect with PD-SOI for Analog and RF Application”, Solid State Electron, vol. 46, 2002, pp. 1169-1176.
Ippoushi, “SOI Structure Avoids Increases in Chip Area and Parasitic Capacitance Enables Operational Control of Transistor Threshold Voltage”, Renesas Edge, vol. 2004.5, Jul. 2004, p. 15.
Hittite Microwave, Floating Ground SPNT MMIC Switch Driver Techniques, 2001.
Caverly, et al., “Gallium Nitride-Based Microwave and RF Control Devices”, 2001.
Sedra, et al., “Microelectronic Circuits”, University of Toronto, Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition, 1982,1987,1991,1998, pp. 374-375.
Bahl, “Lumped Elements for RF and Microwave Circuits”, Artech House, 2003, pp. 353-394.
“Positive Bias GaAs Multi-Throw Switches with Integrated TTL Decoders”, Hittite Microwave, 2000.
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Oct. 2, 2012 for related appln. No. 11154277.55, 14 pgs.
Tran, Pablo, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 26, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 14 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 5, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 5 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 6, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 7 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 18, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 47 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 17, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 24 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 20, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 20 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 19, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 3 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 5, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 8 pgs.
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 12, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 26 pgs.
Burgener, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 14, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 3 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200259484 A1 Aug 2020 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10658154 Sep 2003 US
Child 12799583 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 16169831 Oct 2018 US
Child 16793969 US
Parent 14883525 Oct 2015 US
Child 16169831 US
Parent 13769780 Feb 2013 US
Child 14883525 US
Parent 12799583 Apr 2010 US
Child 13769780 US