This invention generally relates to electronic power supplies, and more specifically to capacitive energy transfer DC-to-DC converters (DC/DC converters), such as charge pumps.
DC/DC converter power supply circuits provide a DC output voltage based upon a DC source voltage. The output is typically at a different voltage than the input. As the term is used herein, DC/DC converters do not encompass voltage reduction regulator circuits that use a linear pass device, but rather involve energy transfer from input to output through an energy storage device, such as a capacitor or an inductor.
The DC/DC converters of interest herein are charge pumps, which obtain energy for the output voltage primarily by means of capacitive transfer from the source to the output. An inductor is not generally the primary energy transfer device in a charge pump, though of course hybrid devices are possible that employ inductive energy transfer in addition to capacitive energy transfer. A charge pump may derive an output voltage that is higher than a source voltage, or that is inverted from a source voltage, or that is referenced to a different voltage than the source voltage, and indeed may do all of these things concurrently.
Charge pumps may be implemented for a wide variety of purposes. They are well suited for integrated circuit fabrication because the devices and elements required are compatible with most integrated circuit fabrication techniques. For example, a charge pump may be employed to generate a negative gate bias supply for an integrated circuit that switches an antenna between send and receive circuitry of a transceiver, as shown in
A RF switch 112 may be used to perform such antenna switching functions. Ideally, such switches may be integrated together with the receive and/or transmit circuitry, and in any event are desirably very small, due to space limitations in portable transceivers such as mobile telephones and handy talkies. In order to achieve good performance from switching devices, such as MOSFETs, used to implement such RF switches, many designs need a special bias supply that extends negatively below the supply rails of the transmit and receive circuitry, such as a −3V supply. In view of the space and cost constraints of transceiver units such as mobile telephones, a charge pump is particularly suitable for generating such a bias supply, because it can be readily integrated into a very small circuit.
The RF switch 112 conveys relatively high power signals to the antenna 102 during transmission. However, during receive, the signal passed by the RF switch 112 may be measured in tens of nanovolts. Sharp noise transitions may have an extremely broad Fourier frequency content, and thus even signals at amplitudes on the order of millivolts may interfere unacceptably with reception if the signals have extremely fast edges. While the filter 104 can remove some noise, it is important that the RF switch 112 not introduce noise, particularly noise having components near the center frequency of the received signal. Thus, the receive/transmit switch of
Unfortunately, noise generation is one of the most common drawbacks of charge pumps. Current spikes are typically coupled into both input and output supplies, together with voltage ripples and spikes. When a charge pump is integrated together with other devices, such electronic noise may be coupled throughout the circuitry of the integrated device by a variety of mechanisms that are difficult to control. Thus, a need exists for charge pumps that avoid generating excessive noise, so as to reduce charge pump noise injection into source supplies, output supplies, and related circuits.
The method and apparatus presented herein address this need for a low-noise charge pump. Various aspects of the method and apparatus described herein will be seen to provide further advantages, as well, for the design and construction of charge pumps that are relatively free of noise spurs.
A charge pump method and apparatus for DC-to-DC conversion is set forth by which an output is generated by alternately coupling a transfer capacitor to an input supply and then to the output. A charge pump clock output is generated to control a transfer capacitor coupling switch in a charge pump circuit. The charge pump method (or apparatus) further includes a combination of one or more aspects of the method or apparatus, as set forth below, in order to reduce noise or otherwise improve the design.
One aspect of the charge pump method described herein includes generating an output supply by transferring charge from a source voltage to a transfer capacitor (“TC”) alternately with transferring charge from the TC to the output supply. A TC-coupling switch (“TCCS”) circuit is a switch that couples the TC to a supply under control of a charge pump clock (“CPClk”). This method includes coupling the TC to the output supply during discharge periods via a discharging TCCS circuit, and actively limiting a rate of voltage change of the CPClk output during both positive and negative transitions.
An aspect of the charge pump apparatus described herein may be employed to generate an output voltage supply within a circuit. This aspect includes a transfer capacitor (“TC”) and a plurality of TC coupling switches (“TCCSs”), each TCCS controlled by a charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output. The apparatus also has a CPClk generation circuit, which includes circuitry that limits a rate of rise of the CPClk output and circuitry that limits a rate of fall of the CPClk output. The TCCSs are coupled to the TC, and are controlled to couple the TC to a voltage source during periodic first periods, and to couple the TC to the output voltage during periodic second periods that are not concurrent with the first periods.
Another aspect of the charge pump apparatus described herein may be also be used for generating an output voltage supply within a circuit. This aspect includes a transfer capacitor (“TC”) coupled alternately between source connections and output connections, and a plurality of active switches that are each switchable under control of a charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output to conduct, or not. This aspect includes a CPClk generating circuit that has an active driver circuit configured to source current to, and sink current from, a driver output node, together with circuitry to limit the source current, and circuitry to limit the sink current, of the active driver circuit.
Another aspect of the charge pump described herein is a method of alternately transferring charge from a source voltage to a transfer capacitor (“TC”), and from the TC to an output supply, to generate an output supply. The method includes coupling the TC to the output supply via a discharging switch under control of a charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output. The method also includes limiting source and sink currents between a driver circuit and a corresponding output node, within a generator circuit of the CPClk.
Yet another aspect of the charge pump method described herein alternately transfers charge from a source voltage to a transfer capacitor (“TC”), and from the TC to an output supply. This method includes coupling the TC to the output supply during discharge periods via a discharging switch circuit under control of a single phase charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output, and coupling the TC to the voltage source via a charging switch circuit under control of the single phase CPClk output.
A related aspect of the charge pump apparatus described herein may be used for generating an output voltage supply. This apparatus includes a transfer capacitor (“TC”), one or more source switching devices in series between the TC and the source voltage, and one or more output switching devices in series between the TC and the output supply. A single phase output of a charge pump clock (“CPClk”) generating circuit is coupled to all of the source switching devices to cause them to conduct only during charge periods, and is also coupled to all of the output switching devices to cause them to conduct only during discharge periods, wherein the charge and discharge periods alternate and do not overlap.
A further aspect of the charge pump method described herein may generate an output supply by alternately transferring charge from a source voltage to a transfer capacitor (“TC”), and from the TC to the output supply. This method includes coupling a first charge pump clock (“CPClk”) output to a TC charging switch control node via a first capacitive coupling network, and coupling the TC to the source voltage during charge periods under control of the first CPClk output. The method also includes coupling a second CPClk output to a TC discharging switch control node via a second capacitive coupling network, and coupling the TC to the output supply during discharge periods that nonconcurrently alternate with the charge periods, under control of the second CPClk output.
A further aspect of the charge pump apparatus described herein may be used for generating an output voltage supply, and includes a transfer capacitor (“TC”). This apparatus includes one or more source switching devices, having a corresponding control node, disposed in series between the TC and a source supply, and also includes one or more output switching devices, having corresponding control nodes, disposed in series between the TC and the output supply. This apparatus also includes a capacitive coupling circuit coupling a charge pump clock output to the control node of a source switching device or to the control node of an output switching device.
Yet a further method aspect of the charge pump described herein includes steps of disposing an output hot switch between a transfer capacitor (“TC”) node and a charge pump output, and disposing an output common switch between the opposite TC node and a common connection of the charge pump output. This method also includes establishing a higher control node AC impedance for the hot switch, as compared to a control node AC impedance for the output common switch. A related aspect provides apparatus generally corresponding to this method.
Embodiments of the charge pump method or apparatus may employ any combination of individual aspects of the method or apparatus, and may be configured in a wide range of charge pump architectures and configurations.
Embodiments of the present invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following figures, in which like reference numbers and designations indicate like elements.
Overview—Charge Pump Configurations
Many different output configurations are possible using just these four switches S1204, S2206, S3212 and S4214, together with the transfer capacitor CT 202. A first example is a voltage doubling configuration, wherein Vo1− 218 is connected to VS+ 208, causing Vo1+ 216 to achieve a voltage roughly twice that of VS+ 208 (both with respect to VS− 210, neglecting losses). A second example is a voltage inverting configuration, in which Vo1+ 216 is connected to VS− 210, such that Vo1− will reach approximately −VS (with respect to VS− 210). A third example is a supply isolating configuration, in which neither Vo1+ 216 nor Vo1− 218 is tied through a fixed voltage connection to a source voltage connection. Rather, the input lines may be isolated from the output insofar as is permitted by the isolation capability of the switches S1204 and S3212, and of the switches S2206 and S4214.
The skilled person will understand certain features without a need for explicit details. For example, because the transfer capacitor CT 202 must be disconnected from the output while connecting to the input, maintaining a reasonably constant voltage on the output generally requires a storage device. Such storage device typically comprises a filter capacitor, which is not shown in
Additional output connection switches, such as S5220 and S6222, may enable a charge pump to provide other voltages, multiplexing the use of a single transfer or fly capacitor CT 202. For example, charge and discharge cycles may alternate without overlapping. CT may be charged to VS during each charge cycle. However, during one discharge cycle, CT may be discharged to Vo2 (Vo2+ 224 to Vo2− 226), while during another discharge cycle CT is discharged to Vo1. In this manner, three voltages of roughly equal value may be created—VS, Vo1 and Vo2. The connections made between these voltages determines whether the charge pump circuit functions as a voltage tripler, or as a double-voltage inverter, an isolated 2*VS supply, two isolated outputs, etc. These principles may be extended to further output combinations.
In typical implementations, each of the switches S1204, S2206, S3212 and S4214 (as well as other switches if used, such as S5220 and S6222) may comprise an appropriate transistor, such as a MOSFET. However, in many circumstances it is possible to substitute a simple diode for a switch, when the voltage and current flow requirements of the particular configuration of a specific charge pump circuit permit.
The basic charge pump architecture illustrated in
Charge Pump Noise
As noted above, noise is one of the most common problems associated with charge pumps.
Four ammeters are represented to illustrate paths in which noise currents may occur. From these paths, noise may be unintentionally coupled other circuits associated with the charge pump. For example, voltage noise may be coupled into other circuits through common supply connections, or via parasitic capacitive coupling, while current noise may be injected into other circuits through inductive coupling, or via a shared impedance. A source loading ammeter 342 is disposed between the source supply Vs+ 208 and the switch 304, and an output charging ammeter 344 is disposed between the switch 312 and the output filter capacitor 330. Clock generator ammeters are disposed between the clock generator 350 and its supply source, with ammeter 346 between Vs+ 208 and clock generator 350, and ammeter 348 between the clock generator 350 and Vs− 210. The explanation of charge pump noise currents, which is set forth below with reference to these four ammeters, is representative in nature, and is not intended to be comprehensive.
In
At the end of the charging period, the switches 304 and 306 will be turned off. A change in current will register in the ammeter 342 if CT 202 is not fully charged at this time, with a di/dt slope that depends in part upon the speed with which the series combination of switches 304 and 306 is turned off. Because the first clock output 354 and the second clock output 356 are coupled to corresponding control nodes of switches 304 and 306, respectively, the outputs 354 and 356 will be driven up to a voltage greater than their threshold voltages, which will induce a nonconducting off state in these switches. To drive up the voltage of the control nodes, these clock outputs source current to drive the gate capacitance (and/or other parasitic capacitances and impedances) of the corresponding switch. The drive current will register in the ammeter 346. Due to the parasitic capacitances, a high dv/dt gate drive will typically cause a significant capacitive current spike in the corresponding ammeter 346.
After the switches 304 and 306 are off, a discharge period may ensue that does not overlap the charge period. To begin the discharge period, the third clock 362 and the fourth clock 364 will raise voltages of control nodes of the switches 314 and 312, respectively, above a Vgs threshold voltage to turn each switch on to a conducting state. The resulting capacitive gate current of the switches 312 and 314 will register in the ammeter 346, with a peak value and di/dt that depend in part upon dv/dt of the clock output. In order to minimize power dissipation in the switches, the clock edges in such circuits have typically been made rather fast.
As the later of switches 312 and 314 turns on, CT 202 begins discharging into Co 330 with a current that will register in the ammeter 344. At the end of the discharge clock period, the third clock output 362 and the fourth clock output 364 sink current to drive down to an off voltage, causing gate currents, to discharge the gate capacitance of the corresponding switches, that will register in ammeter 348. Finally, CT 202 is disconnected from Co 330, which may cause another current step to register in the ammeter 344 if discharging of CT 202 has not been completed.
All switches remain off until the clock outputs 354 and 356 sink current from the gates of switches 304 and 306, respectively, to reduce the control node voltage of those switches to a level that is negatively greater than their Vgs thresholds, thereby causing the switches to turn on and begin the charging period. The sink current provided by the clock outputs 354 and 356 to effect this change will register in the ammeter 348. A di/dt of such current depends substantially upon a magnitude of the dv/dt at which these clock outputs transition negatively.
Each high di/dt current spike described above is likely to be coupled into nearby circuitry, whether through mutual inductances, common impedances, or common connections. Reducing some or all of the identified noise sources may be desirable for circuits, such as that described with respect to
Quiet Inverting Charge Pump
The current source capability of the driver circuit 416 is limited through a source current limit circuit 426, which may, for example, comprise a P-channel FET 428 (W 1.5, L 2). The FET 428 may be gate-coupled to the P-gate reference 412 as a current mirror that limits current, for example, to 1 μA or less. The current sink capability of the driver circuit 416 may be similarly limited by a sink current limit circuit 430, comprised for example of an N-channel FET 432 (W 1.5, L 4) coupled to the N-gate reference 414 as a current mirror (e.g. limited to 1 μA). Establishing 1 μA current limits in FETs 428 and 432 may require about 5 μA through reference current FETs 408 and 410, due to the 1:5 size ratio of the exemplary corresponding devices. Equal magnitudes for source and sink current limits may reduce undesirable harmonic generation. Any other appropriate techniques for creating current limited drive circuits may be employed in the alternative, such as using low-conductivity FETs or resistors, etc., to restrain either or both of the source and sink drive capability of such drive circuit.
Additional circuitry, shown connected by phantom lines to the P-gate and N-gate references 412 and 414, represents optional additional current-limited inverter circuits that may be coupled to the same current reference voltages 412 and 414.
Output transition dv/dt of CLK output 524 of the driver circuit 506 is actively limited by the source and sink current limits 512 and 518, in conjunction with the combined distributed capacitance of each driven device, which is represented by phantom capacitor 526. A discrete capacitor may, of course, be added if appropriate. The devices that constrain dv/dt on the input node of driver circuit 506 also limit dv/dt of the CLK output 524. Series connection of the three inverting driver circuits 502, 504, and 506, creates a ring oscillator. The current-starved ring oscillator 500 is an example of a charge pump clock generating circuit that includes circuits to reduce switching speeds of substantially all driver circuits within the clock generator. The current-starved ring oscillator 500 is also an exemplary circuit for producing a charge pump clock output 524 for which dv/dt is actively limited in both negative and positive transitions. Voltage of the CLK output 524 may oscillate substantially rail-to-rail (e.g., between 0 to Vin+) with low dv/dt transitions, and may have a significantly sine-like shape.
During this discharge period, the N-channel FET 608 couples one terminal of the fly capacitor 606 to a common reference (404) connection of the output supply. Concurrently, the N-channel FET 610 couples the opposite terminal of the fly capacitor 606 to the connection of the output supply (the junction of FET 610 and capacitor 614) that is opposite to the common reference connection of the output supply. The area of the device 610 is made much smaller (e.g., half as large, or less—one fourth as large in the exemplary embodiment) than the area of the device 608. The smaller size helps to reduce noise injection into the output, for example by minimizing coupling of control signals through the gate capacitance of the FET 610. For a typical FET, the device area is simply the length times the width. If other processing parameters are constant, a control node AC impedance (to conducting control signals into the switch) will vary approximately inversely with such area. However, control signal AC coupling impedance may be increased in other ways, for example by reducing the parasitic gate-body capacitance through increases in the dielectric thickness or reduction in the dielectric constant. Thus, the device 610 may be configured in various ways to have at least twice the control node AC impedance of the device 608.
The voltage on storage capacitor 614 is filtered, by means of a resistor 616 and filter capacitor 618, to provide a filtered output supply voltage Vo− with respect to common reference 404. The exemplary embodiment provides a quiet output but relatively low current capacity. The skilled person will readily adjust the current capacity of a circuit such as that of
Each of the FETs 602, 604, 608 and 610 is an example of an actively controllable transfer capacitor coupling switch (“TCCS”). First, each is disposed in series to couple a node of the transfer capacitor to the source supply (for charging switches) or to the output supply (for discharging switches). Second, the conductivity of each is actively controllable, under control of a signal applied to a control node of the switch (here, the gate of the FET). Such a control node has a significant impedance to primary conducting connections (here, the source and drain connections).
As shown in
In the case of a FET 610, the coupling is effected by two coupling circuits connected in series to reduce voltage stresses. Thus, a capacitor 636 (e.g., 2 pf) couples the CLK 524 to an intermediate node where it is biased by a resistor 638 (e.g., 10 MΩ) to an intermediate average voltage level (common reference voltage, in this case). From this intermediate node the charge pump clock output signal is coupled via a capacitor 624 (e.g., 2 pf) to the gate of the FET 610, and biased by a resistor 632 (e.g., 10 MΩ) to the source voltage of the FET. The modified capacitive coupling circuit for the FET 610 provides an example of a modified circuit that differs in some regard, but functions substantially equivalently, to another. Any circuit illustrated or described herein may be replaced (as needed) by such a modified circuit, if substantially the same function is performed. Extended voltage capacity circuits, such as series or cascode-coupled transistors or the series capacitors described above, and increased current capacity circuits, such as parallel combinations of transistors, are examples of such equivalent circuits that may be employed, in place of any illustrated circuit, to satisfy particular design goals.
In the exemplary circuit, N-channel switches such as FETs 608 and 610 are switched on concurrently while P-channel switches such as FETs 602 and 604 are off, and the converse is also true. The gate threshold voltage of N-channel switches is positive (e.g., conductive for Vgs>0.5V), while the gate threshold voltage of P-channel switches is negative (e.g., conductive for Vgs<−0.25V). The active limitation of the dv/dt of transitions of CLK 524 therefore creates a period of time when all switches are off (i.e., the duration of the transition from [average of CLK 524 −0.25] to [average of CLK 524 +0.5V]. Single-phase clock drive of a charge pump may be effected using different types of switches that have correspondingly different control voltage thresholds. However, bias voltages may need to be adjusted accordingly to avoid simultaneous conduction of devices, such as FETs 602 and 608, that are disposed in series across a supply. The circuits and devices of
Each capacitive gate drive circuit shown in
Charge pumps are extremely versatile, and aspects of the charge pump method and apparatus herein may be employed in virtually any charge pump configuration. Some alternative techniques are set forth below, each of which may be implemented using aspects of the method and apparatus described herein.
Passive switch 704 may be an N-channel enhancement MOSFET connected drain to gate and having a low threshold voltage of about 0.5V, or may be a diode (anode to capacitor 702, cathode to ground), for example a low-voltage Schottky diode. Passive switch 706 may similarly be a diode-connected N-channel enhancement FET, or may be a discrete diode with anode to output capacitor 708, cathode to transfer capacitor 702. The dv/dt control of the drive CLK 524 effects quiet operation. However, there is some loss of efficiency and voltage output due to the non-zero forward conduction voltage of the devices 704 and 706. Thus, if CLK 524 is 3V p-p (e.g., oscillates between +3V and common), then Vo− 710 may be only about −2.5V, even at light loads.
Passive switches similar to devices 704 or 706 may be substituted in place of one or more active switches in many designs described herein, simplifying design but typically reducing output voltage. For example, in
The circuit of
In
Additionally, in circuits otherwise comporting with
Moreover, if Vd 910 and Va 904 are equivalent to Vin+ 402 and common reference 404 of
Innumerable alternative embodiments of the charge pumps described above are possible. Any clock generator may be employed. It is desirable that the clock generator avoid introducing high di/dt noise on the supply, as can be achieved with many analog designs (for example, as shown in
The foregoing description illustrates exemplary implementations, and novel features, of aspects of a charge pump method and apparatus for generating new voltages in circuits. The skilled person will understand that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the methods and apparatus illustrated may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Numerous alternative implementations have been described, but it is impractical to list all embodiments explicitly. As such, each practical combination of apparatus and method alternatives that are set forth above or shown in the attached figures, and each practical combination of equivalents of such apparatus and method alternatives, constitutes a distinct alternative embodiment of the subject apparatus or methods. For example, a charge pump having a plural transfer capacitor (or ‘stacked’) architecture as shown in
All variations coming within the meaning and range of equivalency of the various claim elements are embraced within the scope of the corresponding claim. Each claim set forth below is intended to encompass any system or method that differs only insubstantially from the literal language of such claim, as long as such system or method is not, in fact, an embodiment of the prior art. To this end, each described element in each claim should be construed as broadly as possible, and moreover should be understood to encompass any equivalent to such element insofar as possible without also encompassing the prior art.
This application is a continuation of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 16/169,831, filed Oct. 24, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,608,617, issued Mar. 31, 2020; which is a continuation of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 14/883,525, filed Oct. 14, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,148,255, issued Dec. 4, 2018; which is a continuation of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 13/769,780, filed Feb. 18, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,190,902, issued Nov. 17, 2015; which is a continuation and claims the benefit of priority under 35 USC § 120 of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 12/799,583, filed Apr. 27, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,736, issued Feb. 19, 2013; which application Ser. No. 12/799,583 is a divisional application of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 10/658,154, filed Sep. 8, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,719,343, issued May 18, 2010; and the contents of all of the patent applications and issued patents set forth above are hereby incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in full.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3470443 | Berry et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3646361 | Pfiffner | Feb 1972 | A |
3731112 | Smith | May 1973 | A |
3878450 | Greatbatch | Apr 1975 | A |
3942047 | Buchanan | Mar 1976 | A |
3943428 | Whidden | Mar 1976 | A |
3955353 | Astle | May 1976 | A |
3975671 | Stoll | Aug 1976 | A |
3995228 | Pass et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4047091 | Hutchines et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4061929 | Asano | Dec 1977 | A |
4068295 | Portmann | Jan 1978 | A |
4106086 | Holbrook et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4186436 | Ishiwatari | Jan 1980 | A |
4316101 | Minner | Feb 1982 | A |
4321661 | Sane | Mar 1982 | A |
4344050 | Callahan | Aug 1982 | A |
4374357 | Olesin et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4388537 | Kanuma | Jun 1983 | A |
4390798 | Kurafuji | Jun 1983 | A |
4460952 | Risinger | Jul 1984 | A |
RE31749 | Yamashiro | Nov 1984 | E |
4485433 | Topich | Nov 1984 | A |
4575644 | Leslie | Mar 1986 | A |
4621315 | Vaughn et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4633106 | Backes et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4638184 | Kimura | Jan 1987 | A |
4679134 | Bingham | Jul 1987 | A |
4703196 | Arakawa | Oct 1987 | A |
4736169 | Weaver et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4739191 | Puar | Apr 1988 | A |
4746960 | Valeri et al. | May 1988 | A |
4752699 | Cranford, Jr. et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4769784 | Doluca et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4777577 | Bingham et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4797899 | Fuller | Jan 1989 | A |
4839787 | Kojima et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4847519 | Wahl et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4891609 | Eilley | Jan 1990 | A |
4897774 | Bingham et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4918336 | Graham et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5023465 | Douglas et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5023494 | Tsukii et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5029282 | Ito | Jul 1991 | A |
5032799 | Milberger et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036229 | Tran | Jul 1991 | A |
5038325 | Douglas et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5061907 | Rasmussen | Oct 1991 | A |
5068626 | Takagi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5075572 | Poteet et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5093586 | Asari | Mar 1992 | A |
5111375 | Marshall | Mar 1992 | A |
5124571 | Gillingham et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5126590 | Chem | Jun 1992 | A |
5138190 | Yamazaki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146178 | Nojima et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5081371 | Wong | Nov 1992 | A |
5180928 | Choi | Jan 1993 | A |
5182529 | Chern | Jan 1993 | A |
5193198 | Yokouchi | Mar 1993 | A |
5196996 | Oh | Mar 1993 | A |
5208557 | Kersh | May 1993 | A |
5212456 | Kovalcik et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216588 | Bajwa et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5274343 | Russell et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5289137 | Nodar et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5306954 | Chan et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5317181 | Tyson | May 1994 | A |
5349306 | Apel | Sep 1994 | A |
5392186 | Alexander et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392205 | Zavaleta | Feb 1995 | A |
5394372 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5408140 | Kawai et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5418499 | Nakao | May 1995 | A |
5422586 | Tedrow et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5446418 | Hara et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455794 | Javanifard et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465061 | Dufour | Nov 1995 | A |
5483434 | Seesink | Jan 1996 | A |
5493249 | Manning | Feb 1996 | A |
5519360 | Keeth | May 1996 | A |
5535160 | Yamaguchi | Jul 1996 | A |
5546031 | Seesink | Aug 1996 | A |
5553021 | Kubono et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554892 | Norimatsu | Sep 1996 | A |
5589793 | Kassapian | Dec 1996 | A |
5600281 | Mori et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5670907 | Gorecki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672992 | Nadd | Sep 1997 | A |
5677649 | Martin | Oct 1997 | A |
5677650 | Kwasniewski et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689213 | Sher | Nov 1997 | A |
5694308 | Cave | Dec 1997 | A |
5698877 | Gonzalez | Dec 1997 | A |
5729039 | Beyer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734291 | Tasdighi | Mar 1998 | A |
5757170 | Pinney | May 1998 | A |
5774404 | Eto | Jun 1998 | A |
5786617 | Merrill et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793246 | Vest et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5808505 | Tsukada | Sep 1998 | A |
5812939 | Kohama | Sep 1998 | A |
5818289 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818766 | Song | Oct 1998 | A |
5864328 | Kajimoto | Jan 1999 | A |
5874849 | Marotta et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878331 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889428 | Young | Mar 1999 | A |
5892400 | van Saders et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5917362 | Kohama | Jun 1999 | A |
5945867 | Uda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945879 | Rodwell et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5959335 | Bryant et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969571 | Swanson | Oct 1999 | A |
5969988 | Tanzawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986649 | Yamazaki | Nov 1999 | A |
6020781 | Fujioka | Feb 2000 | A |
6020848 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6064253 | Faulkner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064275 | Yamauchi | May 2000 | A |
6064872 | Vice | May 2000 | A |
6081165 | Goldman | Jun 2000 | A |
6094103 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107885 | Miguelez et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122185 | Utsunomiya | Sep 2000 | A |
6130572 | Ghilardelli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137367 | Ezzedine et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169444 | Thurber | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188590 | Chang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195307 | Umezawa et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
RE37124 | Monk et al. | Apr 2001 | E |
6223990 | Kamei | May 2001 | B1 |
6226206 | Maeda | May 2001 | B1 |
6249446 | Shearon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275096 | Hsu | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6297687 | Sugimura | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308047 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6337594 | Hwang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339349 | Rajagopalan | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356062 | Elmhurst et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6400211 | Yokomizo | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411531 | Nork et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414863 | Bayer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424585 | Ooishi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429632 | Forbes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429723 | Hastings | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429732 | Tedrow et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452232 | Adan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6486728 | Kleveland | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6486729 | Imamiya | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6496074 | Sowlati | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504213 | Ebina | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518829 | Butler | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535071 | Forbes | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537861 | Kroell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6559689 | Clark | May 2003 | B1 |
6560164 | Kawai | May 2003 | B2 |
6563366 | Kohama | May 2003 | B1 |
6617933 | Ito | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6653697 | Hidaka et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661682 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6661683 | Botker | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664861 | Murakami | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677641 | Kocon | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6714065 | Komiya et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717458 | Potanin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737926 | Forbes | May 2004 | B2 |
6744224 | Ishii | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6784737 | Martin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788130 | Pauletti et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6788578 | Tang | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6794927 | Bedarida et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801076 | Merritt | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6803807 | Fujiyama et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806761 | Aude | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6809603 | Ho | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812775 | Seo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816000 | Miyamitsu | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816001 | Khouri et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816016 | Sander et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819187 | Ming et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6819938 | Sahota | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825699 | Marshall et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825730 | Sun | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6828614 | Gonzalez | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831499 | Oddone et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831847 | Perry | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833745 | Hausmann et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833752 | Merritt et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836173 | Yang | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836176 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6844762 | Sanchez | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847251 | Kao et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853566 | Itoh | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855655 | Wagner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856177 | de Frutos et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6871059 | Piro et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879502 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891234 | Connelly et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6897708 | Hamasako | May 2005 | B2 |
6906575 | Tanaka | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6947720 | Razavi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954623 | Chang et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967523 | DeMone | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6968020 | Jayaraman | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7023260 | Thorp et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042245 | Hidaka | May 2006 | B2 |
7068096 | Chu | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068114 | Nishiyama | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7102449 | Mohan | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7109532 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7123898 | Burgener et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126595 | Yanagi | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129796 | Goto | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7161197 | Nakatsuka et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7180794 | Matsue | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202712 | Athas | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212788 | Weber et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7256642 | Kimura | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7355455 | Hidaka | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359677 | Huang et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7382176 | Ayres et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7391282 | Nakatsuka et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7430133 | McIntyre et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7457594 | Theobold et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460852 | Burgener et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7486128 | Yen et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7515882 | Kelcourse et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7532061 | Ragone et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7546089 | Bellantoni | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551036 | Berroth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7560977 | Miyazaki et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570104 | Hsu | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7649403 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7659152 | Gonzalez et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667529 | Consuelo et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7719343 | Burgener | May 2010 | B2 |
7724070 | Fukami | May 2010 | B2 |
7724072 | Baek et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7733156 | Brederlow et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733157 | Brederlow et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741869 | Hidaka | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756494 | Fujioka et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7786807 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7796969 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7817966 | Prikhodko et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7860499 | Burgener et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7868683 | Ilkov | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7910993 | Brindle et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7928759 | Hidaka | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7928796 | Namekawa | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7936213 | Shin et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7944277 | Sinitsky et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7956675 | Saitoh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7969235 | Pan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7982265 | Challa et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8040175 | Raghavan | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8067977 | Joo | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072258 | Yamahira | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8103226 | Andrys et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8131251 | Burgener et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8195103 | Waheed et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8253494 | Biednov | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8339185 | Cazzaniga et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8378736 | Burgener | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8497670 | Molin et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8559907 | Burgener et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8649741 | Iijima et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8649754 | Burgener et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674749 | Tran et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8686787 | Swonger | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8816659 | Kim et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8954902 | Stuber et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8994452 | Kim et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995154 | Kaneda | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9030248 | Kim et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9087899 | Brindle et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9106072 | Khatri | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9154027 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9190902 | Burgener | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9225378 | Burgener et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9252651 | Mott | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9264053 | Englekirk | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9276526 | Nobbe | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312822 | Knopik | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9312909 | Kang et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9354654 | Swonger | May 2016 | B2 |
9369087 | Burgener et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385669 | Banerjee | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9397656 | Dribinsky et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9413362 | Englekirk | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9419560 | Korol | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9429969 | Kim et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9531413 | Sun et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9577626 | Crandall | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9584097 | Bakalski | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9590614 | Cebi | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9654094 | Ishimaru et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9660590 | Kim et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9680416 | Burgener et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9685963 | Englekirk | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9768683 | Englekirk | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9778669 | Kim et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9793795 | Englekirk | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9871512 | Ho | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9882531 | Willard | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9948252 | Adamski | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9966988 | Burgener et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9998002 | Englekirk | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10097171 | Li | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10148255 | Burgener | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10236872 | Willard et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10243519 | Dykstra | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10250131 | Kim et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10587229 | Costa | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10608617 | Burgener | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20010031518 | Kim et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020079971 | Vathulya | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020115244 | Park et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020140412 | Maneatis | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153940 | Wurcer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030002452 | Sahota | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030141543 | Bryant et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030201494 | Maeda et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040061130 | Morizuka | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080364 | Sander et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040129975 | Koh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040204013 | Ma et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050052220 | Burgener et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077564 | Forbes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050121699 | Chen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122163 | Chu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060114731 | Park | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060194558 | Kelly | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060281418 | Huang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284670 | Eid et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070018247 | Brindle et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070045697 | Driesch, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069801 | Ragone et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075784 | Pettersson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070146064 | Morie et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070279120 | Brederlow et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007980 | Fujiwara | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080044041 | Tucker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080076371 | Dribinsky et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080116979 | Lesso et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080272833 | Ivanov et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298605 | Fan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090066407 | Bowman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090140795 | Choy | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100033226 | Kim et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052771 | Hartono | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100110736 | Gronthal et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100214010 | Burgener et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100245327 | Tsujino et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100330938 | Yin | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110156819 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163779 | Hidaka | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169550 | Brindle et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110299437 | Mikhemar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120007679 | Burgener et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120038344 | Kim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120064952 | Iijima et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120139643 | Scott | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120200338 | Olson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242379 | Obkircher et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120286854 | Swonger | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130015717 | Dykstra | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130082782 | Leuschner | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130148456 | Cho et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130229841 | Giuliano | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130293280 | Brindle et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310114 | Zohny | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130320955 | Kratyuk et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140028521 | Bauder et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140055194 | Burgener et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140085006 | Mostov et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140087673 | Mostov et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140179249 | Burgener et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140306767 | Burgener et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150002195 | Englekirk | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150002214 | Englekirk | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150084610 | Kim et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150280655 | Nobbe | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160126835 | Englekirk | May 2016 | A1 |
20160126906 | Maxim | May 2016 | A1 |
20160179114 | Kim et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191022 | Burgener et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160285363 | Englekirk | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170098996 | Englekirk | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170149437 | Luo | May 2017 | A1 |
20170237462 | Burgener et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180046210 | Kim et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180091045 | Englekirk | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20200007088 | Ranta | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102005039138 | Feb 2007 | DE |
385641 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0622901 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 938 094 | Jan 1999 | EP |
2421132 | Feb 2012 | EP |
1664966 | Jul 2014 | EP |
1774620 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2830203 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2884586 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2451524 | Feb 2009 | GB |
55-75348 | Jun 1980 | JP |
01-254014 | Nov 1989 | JP |
04-34980 | Feb 1992 | JP |
04-334105 | Nov 1992 | JP |
05-111241 | Apr 1993 | JP |
06-152334 | May 1994 | JP |
06-314985 | Nov 1994 | JP |
06-334506 | Dec 1994 | JP |
08-148949 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08-307305 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09-161472 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-200021 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10-93471 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-242477 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-242829 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-344247 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-136111 | May 1999 | JP |
11-252900 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-166220 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000166220 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001-051758 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-119281 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-119927 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-119053 | Apr 2002 | JP |
03-060451 | Feb 2003 | JP |
03-198248 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-147175 | May 2004 | JP |
2005-057860 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006-352326 | Dec 2006 | JP |
5675529 | Jan 2015 | JP |
57779166 | Jul 2015 | JP |
WO 9523460 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO9858382 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2009063661 | May 2009 | WO |
2010008586 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 13, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 55 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo No., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 15, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 26 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 15, 2015 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 83 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Amendment—Response to Restriction filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 15, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 5 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action received from USPTO dated Jun. 11, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 45 pgs. |
Swonger, James, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 12, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 21 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 12, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 8 pgs. |
Tokuda, Kenji, Office Action and English Translation received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Jul. 13, 2013 for related appln. No. 2011-518737, 10 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 24, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 10 pgs. |
Sasaki, Satoshi, English translation of Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Jul. 23, 2013 for related appln. No. 2011-171908, 2 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Aug. 20, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 17 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N. Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Aug. 28, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 18 pgs. |
Muelemans, Bart, Extended Search Report received from the EPO dated Oct. 22, 2013 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 6 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 7, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,743, 11 pgs. |
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 7, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 16 pgs. |
Gentili, Luigi, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Nov. 14, 2013 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 43 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Rule 69 EPC received from the EPO dated Nov. 25, 2013 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 2 pgs. |
Mehari, Yeman, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 2, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 15 pgs. |
Meulemans, Bart, Supplementary European Search Report received from the EPO dated Jan. 22, 2014 for related appln. No. E09798318, 6 pgs. |
Moon, et al., “Design of a Low-Distortion 22-kHz Fifth-Order Bessel Filter”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, 28(1993) December, No. 12, New York, US, pp. 1254-1263. |
Matsumoto, Yasunori, English Translation of Office Action of Japan Patent Office dated Feb. 4, 2014 for related appln. No. 2012-243547, 2 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jan. 8, 2014 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 13 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Rules 90(2) and 70a(2) EPC received from EPO dated Feb. 14, 2014 for related appln. No. 09798318.3, 1 pg. |
Gundlach, Susanne, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Feb. 14, 2014 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 44 pgs. |
Sakurada, Masaki, Office Action and English translation of Japanese Office Action received from the JPO dated Mar. 4, 2014 for related appln. No. 2011-171908, 20 pgs. |
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 12, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 12 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 13, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 19 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Apr. 14, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 12 pgs. |
Toscano, Oliveros, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC dated Apr. 25, 2014 for related appln. No. 05763216.8, 47 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, English translation of Response filed in the JPO filed Apr. 28, 2014 for related appln. No. 2012-243547, 5 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo, Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 8, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,680, 5 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 9, 2014 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 4 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 22, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 10 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 23, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 13 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated May 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 28 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Sep. 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 9 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 17 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 21 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jun. 8, 2016 for appln. No. 09798318.3, 14 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 10, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 20 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Response to Non-Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 15 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,193, 12 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 1, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 17 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 28 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 16, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 19 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 31, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 14 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 18, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 11 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 18, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 17 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 12, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 14 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 3, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,680, 157 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas S., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 2, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 52 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 9 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/059,206, 35 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,483, 15 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Response to Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 29, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/059,206, 4 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 30, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 16 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas S., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jun. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 14 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated May 10, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 10 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 21, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,483, 11 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas S., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Apr. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/179,416, 15 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 18, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/059,206, 51 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Aug. 17, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/382,483, 20 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 18, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,007, 5 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Sep. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,007, 8 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,007, 11 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 11, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/586,007, 3 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas S., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 8, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,945, 12 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 10, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,945, 11 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 20, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,597, 12 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 16, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,042, 26 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas S., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 28, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,945, 9 pgs. |
Aquilani, Dario, Office Action received from the EPO dated Jul. 2, 2018 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 4 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 17, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/688,597, 12 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 11, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,042, 12 pgs. |
Gentili, Luigi, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Sep. 6, 2018 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 29 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 6, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 18 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jun. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/917,218, 12 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 1, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 21 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 19 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 25, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 5 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 16, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 25 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 5, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 18 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 17, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 13 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 10, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 22 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B.,Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 17, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 8 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 22, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 19 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jul. 5, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 22 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Aug. 30, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 13 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 10 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Preliminary Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 16 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Aug. 31, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 9 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 5, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 10 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated May 22, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 12 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 31, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/883,525, 5 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Dec. 7, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,042, 17 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 20, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/143,142, 13 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/167,389, 12 pgs. |
PSemi Corporation, Preliminary Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 12, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 9 pgs. |
PSemi Corporation, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 30, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 14 pgs. |
PSemi Corporation, Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/169,831, 9 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Nov. 9, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 31 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Oct. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 12 pgs. |
Swonger, James, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 1, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 8 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 3, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 9 pgs. |
Meulemans, Bart, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Dec. 17, 2015 for appln. No. 09798318.3, 4 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 30, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 6 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jan. 13, 2016 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 15 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 14 pgs. |
Suzuki, Shigeyuki, English translation of Office Action received from the JPO dated Feb. 2, 2016 for appln. No. 2014-260387, 3 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Amendment After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 9, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 17 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 17, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,193, 37 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas, Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 8 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Response to Restriction Requirement filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 8 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 13 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 25, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 146 pgs. |
Mehari, Yemane, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 29, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,193, 17 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/991,577, 13 pgs. |
Swonger, James, Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 21, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 4 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, English translation of a Response filed in the JPO dated Apr. 28, 2016 for appln. No. 2014-260387, 9 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu, Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 11, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/638,954, 79 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., “Low Noise Charge Pump Method and Apparatus”, application filed in the UPSTO, U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, filed Feb. 18, 2013, 27 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated 12/613 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 18 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 25 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/769,780, 12 pgs. |
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 8, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 15 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieu P., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 8, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 61 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo No., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 7, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 7 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response tiled in the USPTO dated Aug. 25, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 14 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response and English translation filed in the Japanese Patent Office dated Jun. 3, 2014 for related appln. No. 2011-171908, 21 pgs. |
Imbernon, L., Decision to Grant a European Patent Pursuant to Article 97(1) EPC received from the EPO dated Jul. 3, 2014 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 2 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Aug. 19, 2014 for related appln. No. 09798318.3, 20 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 14, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,875, 3 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 20, 2014 for related U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 5 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 10, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/052,680, 13 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 6, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 15 pgs. |
Nguyen, Hieh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 13 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 12 pgs. |
Swonger, James, Response filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 18, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 6 pgs. |
Le, Dinh Thanh, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/460,442, 23 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 13 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 65 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Dec. 4, 2014 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 6 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 68 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Invitation pursuant to Rule 63(1) EPC received from the EPO dated Mar. 3, 2015 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 3 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response to Final Pre-RCE Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 14 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 16 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 20 pgs. |
Imbernon, Lisa, Extended Search Report received from the EPO dated Jan. 8, 2015 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 6 pgs. |
Matsumoto, Yasunori, English translation of Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2015 for appln. No. 2012-243547, 2 pgs. |
Kim, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 13, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/054,781, 3 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/177,062, 5 pgs. |
Swonger, James, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 20, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 9 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Apr. 29, 2015 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 7 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 13 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, English translation of a Response that was filed in the JPO dated May 12, 2015 for appln. No. 2012-243547, 4 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Response After Final Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 17 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jun. 12, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 17 pgs. |
Swonger, James S., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 6, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 10 pgs. |
Wells, Kenneth, Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Jul. 15, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 4 pgs. |
Skibinski, Thomas, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jul. 27, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/932,996, 43 pgs. |
Aquilani, Dario, Extended Search Report received from the EPO dated Jun. 11, 2015 for appln. No. 14182150.4, 9 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jul. 14, 2015 for appln. No. 14178741.6, 9 pgs. |
Ezzeddine, et al., “The High Voltage/High Power FET (HiVP1)”, 2003 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, pp. 215-218. |
Wells, Kenneth B., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,945, 79 pgs. |
Hiltunen, Thomas J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,006, 9 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 28, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/515,967, 96 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 24, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/891,519, 8 pgs. |
Maxim Integrated Products, “Charge Pumps Shine in Portable Designs”, published Mar. 15, 2001, pp. 1-13. |
Nork, Sam, “New Charge Pumps Offer Low Input and Output Noise”, Linear Technology Corporation, Design Notes, Design Note 243, Nov. 2000, pp. 1-2. |
Linear Technology, “LTC1550I/LTC1551L: Low Noise Charge Pump Inverters in MS8 Shrink Cell Phone Designs”, Dec. 1998, pp. 1-2. |
Lascari, Lance, “Accurate Phase Noise Prediction in PLL Synthesizers”, Applied Microwave & Wireless, May 2000, pp. 90-96. |
Texas Instruments, “TPS60204, TPS60205, Regulated 3.3-V, 100-mA Low-Ripple Charge Pump, Low Power DC/DC Converters”, Feb. 2001, Revised Sep. 2001, pp. 1-18. |
Imbernon, Lisa, Communication from the European Patent office for related appln. No. 048168488, dated Apr. 6, 2009, 2 pages. |
Yasuike, Kazuki, English translation of an Office Action of related appln. No. 2006-525525 received from the Japanese atent Office dated Aug. 25, 2009, 3 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Dec. 1, 2004, 26 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Apr. 1, 2005, 27 pages. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Aug. 10, 2005, 39 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment After Final filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Oct. 11, 2005, 32 pages. |
Englund, Terry, Advisory Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 2, 2005, 2 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Notice of Appeal filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 10, 2005, 1 page. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Petition for Revival of Appln. and Facts Statement filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 4, 2007, 4 pgs. |
Englund, Terry, Not. of Non-Compliant Appeal Brief received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 2, 2006, 2 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amended Appeal Brief filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 5, 2007, 161 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Pet. to Expedite Previous Petition filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 8, 2007, 1 pg. |
McLaughlin, Kenya, Decision of Petition under 37 CFR 1.137(f) received from USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 31, 2007, 1 page. |
McLaughlin, Kenya, Decision Granting received from USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Mar. 28, 2007, 1 page. |
Englund, Terry, Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated May 17, 2007, 52 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment After Re-Opening Prosecution filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Sep. 17, 2007, 31 page. |
Englund, Terry, Final Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Dec. 12, 2007, 52 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Not. of Appeal, Pre-Appeal Brief Req. and Pre-Appeal Brief Request for Review filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated May 12, 2008, 7 pages. |
Englund, Terry, Not. of Non-Compliant Appeal Brief received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Apr. 1, 2009, 2 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amended Appeal Brief filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jun. 1, 2009, 175 pages. |
Englund, Terry, Interview Summary received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Oct. 9, 2009, 3 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Stmt. of Substance of Interview filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Nov. 9, 2009, 20 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Dec. 2, 2009, 19 pages. |
Englund, Terry, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Jan. 11, 2010, 22 pages. |
Burgener, Mark, et al., Issue Fee Transmittal filed in USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/658,154, dated Mar. 23, 2010, 1 page. |
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 29, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 19 pages. |
Ebner von Eschenbach, Jennifer, Communication and Supplementary Search Report received from the EPO dated Nov. 27, 2009 for related appln. No, 05763216.8, 10 pages. |
Kai, Tetsuo, Translation of an Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Mar. 29, 2011 for related Japanese appln. No. 2010-232563, 4 pgs. |
Imbernon, Lisa, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from EPO dated May 18, 2011 for related appln. No. 04816848.8, 5 pgs. |
Sircus, Brian, Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 10, 2011 for related application No. PCT/US2009/04149, 17 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Invitation pursuant to Rule 63(1) EPC dated Aug. 19, 2011 for related appln. No. 11154275.9, 3 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 6, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 11 pgs. |
Kurzbauer, Werner, Extended European Search Report received from the EPO dated Dec. 6, 2011 for related appln. No. 11175503.9, 4 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 3, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 46 pgs. |
Fedi, Giulio, Extended Search Report received from the EPO dated Mar. 5, 2012 for related appln. No. 11154277.5, 8 pgs. |
Adams, W. J., et al., “OTA Extended Adjustment Range and Linearization Via Programmable Current Mirrors”, Circuits and Systems, 1991, Proceedings of the 34th Midwest Symposium on Monterey, CA, USA 14-17 May 14, 1991. |
Bogdan Pankiewicz, et al., “A Field Programmable Analog Array for CMOS Continuous-Time OTA-C Filter Applications”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Service Center, vol. 37, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2002. |
Jader, et al., “A Linearly Tunable Low-Voltage CMOS Transconductor with Improved Common-Mode Stability and Its Application to gm-C Filters”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digitalsignal Processing, vol. 48, No. 7, Jul. 1, 2001. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Amendment filed in the EPO dated Mar. 5, 2012 for related appln. No. 11175503.9, 10 pgs. |
Ghilini, Marie, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC received from the EPO dated May 23, 2012 for related appln. No. 11175503.9, 60 pgs. |
Wang, Chi-Chang, et al., “Efficiency Improvement in Charge Pump Circuits”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 852-860. |
Yamamoto, Kazuya, et al., “A 2.2-V Operation, 2.4-GHz Single-Chip GaAs MMIC Transceiver for Wireless Applications”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 502-512. |
Hiramoto, Toshiro, et al., “Low Power and Low Voltage MOSFETs with Variable Threshold Voltage Controlled by Back-Bias”, IEICE Trans. Electron, vol. E83-C, No. 2, Feb. 2000, pp. 161-169. |
Su, Pin, et al., “On the Body-Source Built-In Potential Lowering of SOI MOSFETs”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 24, No. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 90-92. |
Yang, Min, “Sub-100nm Vertical MOSFET's with Si1-x-y GexCy Source/Drains”, a dissertation presented to the faculty of Princeton University, Jun. 2000, 272 pgs. |
Ytterdal, T., et al., “MOSFET Device Physics and Operation”, Device Modeling for Analog and RF CMOS Circuit Design, 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 46 pgs. |
Cherne, et al., U.S. Statutory Invention Registration, Registration No. H1435, May 2, 1995. |
Ohyama, Hirohito, Translation of an Office Action of Japan Patent Office dated Aug. 7, 2012 for related appln. No. 2010-040443, 1 pg. |
Lee, et al., “Analysis of Body Bias Effect with PD-SOI for Analog and RF Application”, Solid State Electron, vol. 46, 2002, pp. 1169-1176. |
Ippoushi, “SOI Structure Avoids Increases in Chip Area and Parasitic Capacitance Enables Operational Control of Transistor Threshold Voltage”, Renesas Edge, vol. 2004.5, Jul. 2004, p. 15. |
Hittite Microwave, Floating Ground SPNT MMIC Switch Driver Techniques, 2001. |
Caverly, et al., “Gallium Nitride-Based Microwave and RF Control Devices”, 2001. |
Sedra, et al., “Microelectronic Circuits”, University of Toronto, Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition, 1982,1987,1991,1998, pp. 374-375. |
Bahl, “Lumped Elements for RF and Microwave Circuits”, Artech House, 2003, pp. 353-394. |
“Positive Bias GaAs Multi-Throw Switches with Integrated TTL Decoders”, Hittite Microwave, 2000. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Oct. 2, 2012 for related appln. No. 11154277.55, 14 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 26, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 14 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 5, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 5 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 6, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 7 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Aug. 18, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 47 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Feb. 17, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 24 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 20, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 20 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 19, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 3 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 5, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 8 pgs. |
Englund, Terry Lee, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 12, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 26 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 14, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/799,583, 3 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200259484 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10658154 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 12799583 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16169831 | Oct 2018 | US |
Child | 16793969 | US | |
Parent | 14883525 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 16169831 | US | |
Parent | 13769780 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14883525 | US | |
Parent | 12799583 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13769780 | US |