The present invention relates to a single mixer with noise reduction.
Mixers are an important building block in transceiver design, because the dynamic range of the receiver is often limited by the first down-conversion mixer. The doubly balanced bipolar Gilbert cell mixer is preferred in integrated circuit applications.
A typical single mixer is illustrated in
A similar low-noise performance is desirable for single mixers.
The system and method of the present invention provide a single mixer with significantly reduced noise performance at a low cost. The system and method of the present invention add a current control circuit 151, as illustrated in
The system and method of the present invention provide several alternative embodiments for a single mixer having significantly reduced noise wherein the low-noise characteristic is enhanced by a further modification to the switching stage.
It is to be understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art that the following descriptions are provided for purposes of illustration and not for limitation. An artisan understands that there are many variations that lie within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the appended claims. Unnecessary detail of known functions and operations may be omitted from the current description so as not to obscure the present invention.
The system and method of the present invention provide several alternatives for implementation of a low-noise mixer.
Referring now to
The mixer further comprises a multiplying stage including first and second pairs of transistors Q1-Q2 and Q3-Q4 respectively coupled to output signals of the transconductance amplifiers formed by transistors Q7 and Q8. A first differential mixing signal 104.1 is generated by a local oscillator (LO) and provided to the base electrodes of the transistors Q1 and Q4. And, a second differential mixing signal 104.2 is generated by the LO and provided to the base electrodes of the transistors Q2 and Q3. A first differential output signal generated on the line 120 is formed by the collector electrodes of the transistors Q2 and Q4, and a second differential output signal is generated on the line 121, being formed by the collector electrodes of the transistors Q1 and Q3. The line 120 together with the collector electrodes of the transistors Q2 and Q4 are coupled to a common biasing line Vcc by way of resistor R2. The line 121 together with the collector electrodes of the transistors Q1 and Q3 are coupled to a common biasing line Vcc by way of resistor R1.
The mixer circuit 200 mixes together the differential input signals 101.1 and 101.2 with the differential mixing signals 104.1 and 104.2 provided by the LO to form the differential output signals generated on the lines 120 and 121. When the differential RF input signals 101.1 and 101.2 are provided to the mixer circuit 200, an appropriate selection of the mixing signals provided to the mixer circuit 200 by the LO at 104.1 and 104.2 permit the mixer to down-convert the input signals such that the differential output signals generated are of IF (intermediate frequency) values. In a transmitter configuration, the input and? LO frequencies are chosen so as to generate an output signal on lines 120 and 121 at their sum frequency, thereby permitting the mixer to up-convert the input signals.
To reduce the noise of this standard mixer, in a first preferred embodiment, an addition to the above-describe standard topology is built with transistors Q5 and Q6107, whose base electrodes are respectively connected to the differential mixing inputs 104.1 and 104.2 of the LO. The collectors of transistors Q5 and Q6107 are connected to the common biasing line Vcc. Transistors Q5 and Q6107 in combination with the current source 108, formed by transistor Q10, and resistor R4 and the bias coupling network 109, formed by capacitor C1 and resistor R5, together form a current control circuit 151.
In this first embodiment, the current through the mixer signal path is modulated with the signal Vctl 110, which is derived from the emitters of transistors Q5 and Q6107. Vctl 110 is a signal having double the frequency of the LO signal (2*f_LO), and reaches its minimum value at the moment that the signals LO+ and LO− are equal. Exactly at this moment, the switching stage 103 generates the most noise and no output signal. Therefore, reducing the current at this moment reduces the mixer noise without significantly affecting the gain of the mixer 200.
Referring now to
The approach disclosed in the two previous embodiments requires more components and a higher current than a traditional mixer, but in low-noise applications this can be a better solution than reducing the noise further through other means, both in terms of achievable performance and current consumption.
Another disadvantage of the first and second embodiments is that the input impedance changes with the frequency of 2*f_LO, since the modulated current flows through the input stage (Q7 . . . Q8) 102 as well as the switching stage 103. Also, the modulated current flows through the power supply. Both effects can result in a leakage of the 2*f_LO frequency. This is partly offset in the prior art circuit by a similar input impedance modulation effect at twice the LO frequency, caused by the presence at the collector nodes of input transistor pair Q7 . . . Q8, of a voltage at twice the LO frequency introduced by the combination of transistor pairs Q1 . . . Q2 and Q3 . . . A4.
As illustrated in
This provides a drawing away of excess DC current that is needed in the input stage 102 to improve linearity, but which does not result in any useful AC signal swing. The reason is that when the low-noise amplifier (LNA of
Moreover, these current sources are modulated through Cbias with the same Vctl signal at a frequency of 2*f_LO, derived by Q5 and Q6107 from the LO signal. This provides the advantage of reducing the current through the switching stage 403 around the time that the LO+ 1104.1 and LO− 104.2 signals are equal in value, which is when most noise is generated in a standard mixer, as in the first embodiment of this invention. However, this modulated current no longer flows through the input stage 102 or the power supply 106, which significantly reduces leakage of the 2*f_LO frequency.
Depending on the technology, this third preferred embodiment might not work at very high frequencies because of the phase shift in the devices M1 and M2. For such frequencies, the second embodiment is preferred.
An additional npn transistor with the switching pair is not a preferred embodiment for the following reasons. If its base is at a potential slightly higher than the mid-point of the LO swing, or if its base is at the same potential but the transistor is, for example, 4× in area, then it will bleed current away from the switching pair at equilibrium. However, it also reduces the desired signal swing when the LO is fully switched, and contributes extra noise all the time (the resistor “current source” from the second embodiment is almost noise-free by comparison). If the base is driven with the rectified signal, the 2× LO signal must be inverted (as must the current source in all embodiments that incorporate such an additional npn transistor), to go through another stage (more current and more phase-shift). Therefore, the addition of an npn transistor with the switching pair is not preferred.
Receiver circuits, are used in many different types of devices including wireless devices such as, but not limited to, cordless telephones, iPod devices, and cell phones. Referring now to
The main application for the current control circuit of the present invention is in high frequency receivers (where the switching time of the switching stage results in significant noise contributions) where only a single mixer (rather than a quadrature one) is used. This includes:
While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the management frame, device,(?) architecture and methods as described herein are illustrative and various changes and modifications may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the true scope of the present invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt the teachings of the present invention to a particular situation without departing from its central scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out the present invention, but that the present invention include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2006/050207 | 1/19/2006 | WO | 00 | 1/8/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/077552 | 7/27/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5732330 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5812591 | Shumaker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6073002 | Peterson | Jun 2000 | A |
6658066 | Magoon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7031687 | Kivekas et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7107030 | Furmidge | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7161406 | Ferris | Jan 2007 | B1 |
20020011890 | Kaneki et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040017862 | Redman-White | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100105350 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60646089 | Jan 2005 | US |