Patent Grant
10753605
The various oxides of nitrogen, known collectively as NOx, and often present primarily in the mono-oxide form NO, form a major component of air pollution including noxious photochemical smog. NOx is typically generated when nitrogen and oxygen in the air combine at high temperatures during the burning of fuel in internal combustion engines; gas turbines; industrial, commercial and residential burners; industrial, commercial, and residential boilers; and/or other combustion applications.
Low NOx burners have been developed but may suffer from relatively high complexity and cost. Low NOx burners may further suffer from relatively poor flame stability and may be prone to flame blow-out. To overcome the tendency to undergo flame blow-out, low NOx burners may typically be operated under a relatively narrow range of turn-down ratios. Because of the effect of reduced turn-down ratio, low NOx burners may typically operate with relatively limited dynamic range with respect to power or heat output, which may be expressed as BTU/hour.
What is needed is a low NOx burner with greater simplicity and/or reduced cost compared to previous low NOx burners. What is additionally or alternatively needed is a low NOx burner that exhibits improved flame stability and/or that is amenable to operation over a relatively wide dynamic range such as to provide load matching.
According to embodiments, a method of reducing the formation of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) evolved from a combustion reaction includes reducing the combustion temperature by operating near a fuel dilution limit.
According to an embodiment, a low NOx burner includes a conductive flame holder supported proximate a diverging fuel stream at a distance along the diverging fuel stream corresponding to a desired fuel concentration, oxygen concentration, fuel/oxygen stoichiometry, or combination thereof. A charge source is configured to impart a charge concentration on a flame surface held by the conductive flame holder. The imparted charge concentration can be selected to cause the flame to remain ignited and in contact with the conductive flame holder.
According to an embodiment, a method of operating a low NOx burner includes supporting a conductive flame holder proximate a diverging fuel stream at a selected distance along the diverging fuel stream and imparting a charge onto a flame held by the conductive flame holder and supported by the diverging fuel stream. The diverging fuel stream is supplied by a nozzle. Flame holding and flame ignition are maintained responsive to cooperation between the imparted charge on the flame and the conductive flame holder.
According to an embodiment, in a low NOx burner, a conductive flame holder is supported at a distance from a fuel nozzle emitting a diverging fuel stream. The distance can be selected to correspond to a desired property of the fuel/air mixture, for example the flammability limit of the mixture. An electric charge source imparting a charge to the flame surface operates in cooperation with the conductive flame holder to cause the flame to remain ignited and in contact with the conductive flame holder. This allows the use of leaner fuel/air mixtures, reducing the flame temperature and lowering NOx production. Mixing of the fuel and air can be increased, further reducing NOx production. Optionally, a sensor is used to monitor the flame condition. Optionally, the position or configuration of the conductive flame holder is automatically or manually adjusted to maintain a desired flame condition.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. Other embodiments may be used and/or other changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure.
According to an embodiment, the fuel stream 104 may diverge at a substantially constant angle from the fuel nozzle 110. The expansion in stream area corresponds to dilution of the fuel by entrainment of a surrounding fluid. For example, the surrounding fluid can include air and/or recycled flue gas. If the surrounding fluid is air, for example, the entrained fluid is about 21% oxygen, 78% nitrogen, and a small amount of other gases. If the surrounding fluid includes a flue gas recycle, for example, the entrained fluid can include about 2% to 5% oxygen, about 78% nitrogen, and combustion products such as carbon dioxide, water vapor and other combustion products found in the flue gas. Recycling flue gas for entrainment with the fuel stream 104 can thus result in a lower concentration of oxygen mixed with the fuel.
Less NOx can be output from a burner supporting a flame 108 having a relatively low temperature. A flame 108 burned near a lean flammability limit can have a lower temperature than a flame 108 burned richer, and can thus output less NOx than a flame 108 burned richer. A flame 108 burned in a lower concentration of oxygen can output less NOx than a flame 108 burned in a higher concentration of oxygen. Moreover, a well-mixed flame 108 tends to output less NOx than a poorly-mixed flame 108.
According to an embodiment, the distance X is selected to correspond to be at or slightly above a lean flammability limit of the fuel under the operating conditions. The application of charges to the flame 108 by the flame charge source 106 has been found to improve flame mixing. These effects cause the burner 101 to exhibit low NOx output.
According to an embodiment, the distance X along an axis of the diverging fuel stream 104 includes a distance x0 from a point 112 to a fuel nozzle 110 plus a distance XE=X−x0 from the fuel nozzle 110. The distance x0 is a function of the size D0 of the aperture 111 in the fuel nozzle 110 through which the fuel stream 104 is emitted. The point 112 may be considered a virtual origin of the diverging fuel stream 104.
The fuel becomes increasingly diluted by the entrainment of surrounding air, flue gas, or other fluid as the diverging fuel stream 104 proceeds from the fuel nozzle 110. In other words, the fuel mixture becomes increasingly lean with increasing distance from the fuel nozzle 110. If the fuel/oxidizer mixture becomes so lean that it will barely support combustion, it may be said that a lean flammability limit has been reached.
Referring again to
The burner 101 can optionally also include an adjustable support (not shown) configured to change the distance X at which the conductive flame holder 102 is supported responsive to a change in the lean flammability limit or other operating parameter of the burner 101, according to an embodiment. An electronic control module (not shown) may be configured to select the distance X along the diverging fuel stream 104 at which the conductive flame holder 102 is supported.
According to an embodiment, the conductive flame holder 102 is shaped to define an aperture corresponding at least approximately to a fuel stream 104 diameter at the distance X. The conductive flame holder 102 includes a conductive ring. The conductive flame holder 102 can additionally or alternatively include a circular tension conductive structure. The conductive flame holder 102 can include a composite assembly configured to adapt the shape of the conductive flame holder 102 to a selected corresponding diverging fuel stream 104 diameter. The conductive flame holder 102 can include a plurality of conductive flame holders 102 sized to correspond to respective selected diameters corresponding to the diverging fuel stream 104. Optionally, the conductive flame holder 102 may include a sharp electrode. Optionally, the conductive flame holder 102 may include a substantially dull electrode.
The low-NOx burner 101 includes, operatively coupled to or forming a portion of the conductive flame holder 102, a node 114 having a selected voltage condition, according to an embodiment. The selected voltage condition of the node 114 includes a voltage different than a voltage applied by the charge source 106 to the flame 108. The selected voltage condition of the node 114 can include a second time-varying voltage corresponding to the electrically conductive surface, the second time-varying voltage being opposite in sign to a first time-varying voltage applied to the charge source 106. Alternatively, the selected voltage condition of the node 114 can include substantially voltage ground. Alternatively, the selected voltage condition of the node 114 can include electrical isolation from ground and from voltages other than the voltage corresponding to the charges imparted onto the flame 108 by the charge source 106.
According to an embodiment, a voltage source 116 is configured to apply a voltage to the charge source 106. The charge source 106 is configured to impart the charge concentration on the flame 108 responsive to the applied voltage. The voltage source 116 can be configured to apply a substantially constant voltage to the charge source 106. Additionally or alternatively, the voltage source 116 can be configured to apply a time-varying voltage to the charge source 106. The time-varying voltage may include a periodic voltage waveform having a 50 to 10,000 Hertz frequency. For example, the time-varying voltage can include a periodic voltage waveform having a 200 to 800 Hz frequency. The time-varying voltage can include a square waveform, sine waveform, triangular waveform, truncated triangular waveform, sawtooth waveform, logarithmic waveform, or exponential waveform, for example. The time-varying voltage can include a waveform having a ±1,000 volt to ±115,000 volt amplitude. For example, the time-varying voltage can include a waveform having a ±8,000 volt to ±40,000 volt amplitude.
According to an embodiment, the charge source 106 can include a sharp electrode such as an electrode configured to eject charges into a dielectric region near the flame 108. A charge ejecting electrode may be referred to as a corona electrode, for example. The charge source 106 can additionally or alternatively include a substantially dull electrode. The charge source 106 can include a depletion electrode configured to deplete ions or electrons having a non-majority charge sign from the flame 108. Alternatively, the charge source 106 can include a charge adding apparatus configured to apply the majority charge to the flame 108.
The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by a variety of couplings. Various combinations of couplings can be combined. For example, the conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by threaded fasteners. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by one or more rivets. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by one or more weldments. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by one or more brazed fittings. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by one or more held-together surfaces. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by one or more cold-formed joints. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by one or more pressure-formed angles. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by one or more co-molded interfaces. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be formed from or joined by one or more sintered shapes. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and/or the fuel nozzle 110 can be joined by one or more die-cast features. Additionally or alternatively, the conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and the fuel nozzle 110 can be formed as a single piece. The fuel nozzle 110 can be conductive. The conductive flame holder 102, the flame holder support 302, and the fuel nozzle 110 can be aligned such that a fuel aperture 111 in the fuel nozzle 110 is aligned to cause the diverging fuel stream 104 (not shown in
Proceeding to step 414, heat from the flame is applied to a heat-receiving surface. For example, applying heat to a heat-receiving surface can include providing heat in a furnace, in a boiler, in a gas turbine, or in a process material heater.
In step 406, the selected distance along the diverging fuel stream can, for example, substantially correspond to a flammability limit of the fuel.
Optionally, the method 401 includes step 404 wherein the selected distance is determined. According to an embodiment, determining the selected distance includes receiving a signal or operating a sensor to generate a signal indicative of a fuel condition, for example. The distance X along a stream of the fuel is calculated or looked up. The distance X has a relationship to a lean flammability limit corresponding to the fuel condition, for example. The distance X, data corresponding to the distance X, or a signal corresponding to the distance X is output. The output drives a conductive flame holder support to the distance X or an indication of the distance X can be output on an instrument for viewing by a user (e.g., an operating engineer) for manual adjustment of the distance X.
The method 401 may optionally include driving an actuator to support the conductive flame holder at the selected distance along the diverging fuel stream (not shown).
The method 401 also includes applying a voltage to the charge source. The charge source imparts the charge concentration responsive to the applied voltage. Applying a voltage to the charge source can optionally include applying a time-varying voltage to the charge source. Applying a voltage to the charge source can include applying a periodic voltage waveform having a 50 to 10,000 Hertz frequency. For example, applying a voltage to the charge source can include applying a periodic voltage waveform having a 200 to 800 Hertz frequency. Applying a voltage to the charge source can include applying a square waveform, sine waveform, triangular waveform, truncated triangular waveform, sawtooth waveform, logarithmic waveform, or exponential waveform. Applying a voltage to the charge source can include applying a waveform having ±1000 volt to ±115,000 volt amplitude. For example, applying a voltage to the charge source can include applying a waveform having ±8000 volt to ±40,000 volt amplitude.
In step 408, imparting a charge can include applying a voltage to a sharp electrode proximate to the flame. Alternatively, imparting a charge can include applying a voltage to a substantially dull electrode proximate to the flame. Imparting a charge can optionally include applying a voltage to a depletion electrode configured to deplete from the flame ions or electrons having a non-majority charge sign. Additionally or alternatively, imparting a charge can include applying a voltage to a charge adding apparatus configured to apply the majority charge to the flame.
The method 401 includes step 410, wherein a voltage condition is applied to or maintained on the conductive flame holder, according to an embodiment. Applying or maintaining a voltage condition to the conductive flame holder includes applying a voltage different than a voltage applied to a charge source that imparts the charge onto the flame. Additionally or alternatively, applying or maintaining a voltage condition on the conductive flame holder can include applying a second time-varying voltage to the electrically conductive surface, the second time-varying voltage being opposite in sign to a time-varying charge imparted onto the flame. Alternatively, applying or maintaining a voltage condition on the conductive flame holder can include maintaining substantially voltage ground. Additionally or alternatively, applying or maintaining a voltage condition to the conductive flame holder can include maintaining electrical isolation from ground and from voltages other than the voltage corresponding to the charges imparted onto the flame.
According to an embodiment, during a first half cycle 506 of the system, the first voltage waveform 502 applied by the charge source 106 to the flame 108 is lower than the phase-shifted waveform 504 responsively held by the conductive flame holder 102. During the first half cycle 506, electrons are attracted out of at least portions of the flame 108 toward the conductive flame holder 102. Similarly, positively charged species are attracted from proximity to the conductive flame holder 102 toward the flame 108. Current flow corresponding to flow of electrons toward the conductive flame holder 102 correspond (during the first half cycle 506) to the holding of the flame 108 to the conductive flame holder 102.
During a second half cycle 508 of the system, the first voltage waveform 502 applied by the charge source 106 to the flame 108 is higher than the phase-shifted waveform 504 responsively held by the conductive flame holder 102. During the second half cycle 508, electrons are attracted from proximity to the conductive flame holder 102 and into the flame 108 and positive species are attracted from the flame 108 and into proximity with the conductive flame holder 102. Current flow corresponding to flow of positive ions toward the conductive flame holder 102 (or flow of electrons away from the conductive flame holder 102) corresponds (during the second half cycle 508) to the holding of the flame to the conductive flame holder 102.
According to an embodiment, the movement of charged species to and from the conductive flame holder 102 acts to initiate the combustion reaction. For example, the charged species tend to combine with fuel or oxygen to form reactive species that participate in the combustion reaction. Alternatively, the charge species tend to attract oppositely charged species from fuel or oxygen, with the remaining fuel or oxygen fragment being a reactive species that participates in the combustion reaction.
A method of determining a distance X along a fuel stream 104 for supporting a conductive flame holder 102 may include receiving a signal or operating a sensor to generate a signal indicative of a fuel condition, calculating or looking up a distance X along a stream 104 of the fuel, the distance X having a relationship to a lean flammability limit corresponding to the fuel condition, and outputting the distance X, data corresponding to the distance X, or a signal corresponding to the distance X to drive a conductive flame holder support 302 to the distance X or outputting an indication of the distance X on an instrument for viewing by a user.
According to an embodiment, a non-transitory computer readable media carries computer executable instructions configured to cause an electronic control module to perform a method including the steps of receiving a signal or operating a sensor to generate a signal indicative of a fuel condition, calculating or looking up a distance along a stream 104 of the fuel, the distance having a relationship to a lean flammability limit corresponding to the fuel condition. The computer readable media can also carry computer executable instructions for outputting the distance, outputting data corresponding to the distance, or outputting a signal corresponding to the distance to drive a conductive flame holder support 302 to the distance. Additionally or alternatively, the computer readable media can also carry computer executable instructions for outputting an indication of the distance on an instrument for viewing by a user.
While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments are contemplated. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
The present application is a Continuation Application of U.S. Continuation application Ser. No. 14/556,495, entitled “LOW NOx BURNER AND METHOD OF OPERATING A LOW NOx BURNER,” filed Dec. 1, 2014; U.S. Continuation application Ser. No. 14/556,495 claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/043658, entitled “LOW NOx BURNER AND METHOD OF OPERATING A LOW NOx BURNER,” filed May 31, 2013; International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/043658 claims priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/669,634, entitled “LOW NOx BURNER AND METHOD OF OPERATING A LOW NOx BURNER,” filed Jul. 9, 2012, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/653,722, entitled “LOW NOx LIFTED FLAME BURNER,” filed May 31, 2012; each of which, to the extent not inconsistent with the disclosure herein, is incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2127977 | Lamb | Aug 1938 | A |
| 2511177 | Richardson | Jun 1950 | A |
| 2604936 | Kaehni et al. | Jul 1952 | A |
| 2942420 | Clark | Jun 1960 | A |
| 3004137 | Karlovitz | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3087472 | Yukichi | Apr 1963 | A |
| 3167109 | Wobig | Jan 1965 | A |
| 3224485 | Blomgren, Sr. et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3301307 | Nishigaki et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3306338 | Wright et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3358731 | Donnelly | Dec 1967 | A |
| 3373306 | Karlovitz | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3416870 | Wright | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3749545 | Velkoff | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3841824 | Bethel | Oct 1974 | A |
| 4020388 | Pratt, Jr. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4091779 | Saufferer et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4111636 | Goldberg | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4340024 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 5515681 | DeFreitas | May 1996 | A |
| 5641282 | Lee et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5702244 | Goodson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5784889 | Joos et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 6247921 | Helt | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 7137808 | Branston et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7159646 | Dessiatoun et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7243496 | Pavlik et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7523603 | Hagen et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7845937 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 8245951 | Fink et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8851882 | Hartwick et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8881535 | Hartwick et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 9151549 | Goodson et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9209654 | Colannino et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9243800 | Goodson et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9267680 | Goodson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9284886 | Breidenthal et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9289780 | Goodson | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9366427 | Sonnichsen et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9377195 | Goodson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9453640 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 20020092302 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20030017428 | Reiner | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20040185397 | Branston et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050208442 | Heiligers | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208446 | Jayne | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060165555 | Spielman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070020567 | Branston | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20080145802 | Hammer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20100183424 | Roy | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110027734 | Hartwick et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110072786 | Tokuda et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110203771 | Goodson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120156628 | Lochschmied et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120276487 | Hangauer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130004902 | Goodson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130071794 | Colannino et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130170090 | Colannino et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130230810 | Goodson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130260321 | Colannino et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130291552 | Smith et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130323661 | Goodson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130333279 | Osler et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130336352 | Colannino et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140208758 | Breidenthal et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150107260 | Colannino et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150118629 | Colannino et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150121890 | Colannino et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150147705 | Colannino et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150338089 | Krichtafovitch et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160123576 | Colannino et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160245507 | Goodson et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2017777 | Nov 1991 | CA |
| 101351638 | Jan 2009 | CN |
| 1254364 | Nov 1967 | DE |
| 1274781 | Aug 1968 | DE |
| 0844434 | May 1998 | EP |
| 1139020 | Aug 2006 | EP |
| 2738460 | Jun 2014 | EP |
| 2577304 | Dec 1989 | FR |
| 932955 | Jul 1963 | GB |
| 1042014 | Sep 1966 | GB |
| 1140861 | Jan 1969 | GB |
| 58-019609 | Feb 1983 | JP |
| 60-216111 | Oct 1985 | JP |
| 61-265404 | Nov 1986 | JP |
| H 07-48136 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 2001-021110 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001-056120 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| WO 1996001394 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| WO 2012109499 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013181569 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| M. Zake et al., “Electric Field Control of NOx Formation in the Flame Channel Flows.” Global Nest: the Int. J. May 2000, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 99-108. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/043658 dated Sep. 13, 2013. |
| EPO Extended Search Report and Search Opinion of EP Application No. 13796709.7 dated Jan. 18, 2016. |
| James Lawton et al., Electrical Aspects of Combustion 1989, p. 81, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180073727 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61669634 | Jul 2012 | US | |
| 61653722 | May 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14556495 | Dec 2014 | US |
| Child | 15818526 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US2013/043658 | May 2013 | US |
| Child | 14556495 | US |
