The present disclosure relates generally to firing systems for use with pulverized solid fuel-fired furnaces, and more specifically, to a low NOX pulverized solid fuel nozzle tip providing separate and discrete air/pulverized fuel jets for use in such firing systems.
Pulverized solid fuel has been successfully burned in suspension in furnaces by tangential firing methods for a long time. The tangential firing method has many advantages, among them being good mixing of the pulverized solid fuel and air, stable flame conditions, and long residence time of combustion gases in the furnaces.
Systems for delivering the pulverized solid fuel (e.g., coal) to a steam generator typically include a plurality of nozzle assemblies through which the pulverized coal is delivered, using air, into a combustion chamber of the steam generator. The nozzle assemblies are typically disposed within windboxes, which may be located proximate to the corners of the steam generator. Each nozzle assembly includes a nozzle tip, which protrudes into the combustion chamber. Each nozzle tip delivers a single stream, or jet, of the pulverized coal and air into the combustion chamber. After leaving the nozzle tip, the single pulverized coal/air jet disperses in the combustion chamber.
Typically, the nozzle tips are arranged to tilt up and down to adjust the location of the flame within the combustion chamber. The flames produced at each pulverized solid fuel nozzle are stabilized through global heat- and mass-transfer processes. Thus, a single rotating flame envelope (e.g., a “fireball”), centrally located in the furnace, provides gradual but thorough and uniform pulverized solid fuel-air mixing throughout the entire furnace.
Recently, more and more emphasis has been placed on minimization of air pollution. In connection with this, with reference in particular to the matter of NOX control, it is known that oxides of nitrogen are created during fossil fuel combustion primarily by two separate mechanisms which have been identified to be thermal NOX and fuel NOX. Thermal NOX results from the thermal fixation of molecular nitrogen and oxygen in the combustion air. The rate of formation of thermal NOX is extremely sensitive to local flame temperature and somewhat less sensitive to local concentration of oxygen. Virtually all thermal NOX is formed at a region of the flame which is at the highest temperature. The thermal NOX concentration is subsequently “frozen” at a level prevailing in the high temperature region by the thermal quenching of the combustion gases. The flue gas thermal NOX concentrations are, therefore, between the equilibrium level characteristic of the peak flame temperature and the equilibrium level at the flue gas temperature.
On the other hand, fuel NOX derives from the oxidation of organically bound nitrogen in certain fossil fuels such as coal and heavy oil. The formation rate of fuel NOX is highly affected by the rate of mixing of the fossil fuel and air stream in general, and by the local oxygen concentration in particular. However, the flue gas NOX concentration due to fuel nitrogen is typically only a fraction, e.g., approximately 20 to 60 percent, of the level which would result from complete oxidation of all nitrogen in the fossil fuel. From the preceding, it should thus now be readily apparent that overall NOX formation is a function both of local oxygen levels and of peak flame temperatures.
Although the pulverized solid fuel nozzle tips of the prior art are operative for their intended purposes, there has nevertheless been evidenced in the prior art a need for such pulverized solid fuel nozzle tips to be further improved, specifically in the pursuit of reduced air pollution, e.g., NOX emissions. More specifically, a need has been evidenced in the prior art for a new and improved low NOX pulverized solid fuel nozzle tip for use in a tangential firing system that would enable more flexibility in the control of undesirable emissions such as nitric oxides.
According to the aspects illustrated herein, there is provided a nozzle tip for a pulverized solid fuel pipe nozzle of a pulverized solid fuel-fired furnace. The nozzle tip includes: a primary air shroud having an inlet and an outlet, wherein the inlet receives a fuel flow; and a flow separator disposed within the primary air shroud, wherein the flow separator disperses the fuel flow from the outlet to provide a fuel flow jet which reduces NOX in the pulverized solid fuel-fired furnace
The above described and other features are exemplified by the following figures and detailed description.
Referring now to the figures, which are exemplary embodiments, and wherein the like elements are numbered alike:
As with all of the figures, elements with the same reference numbers perform the same or very similar function with the same or very similar structure. Therefore, a description in connection with one figure will apply to the element having the same reference number in all other figures.
Disclosed herein is a low NOX pulverized solid fuel nozzle tip, and more specifically, a pulverized solid fuel nozzle tip that provides separate and discrete air/pulverized fuel jets for use in a firing system of a pulverized solid fuel-fired furnace. As compared to a nozzle providing a single air/pulverized fuel jet, penetration of the separate and discrete air/pulverized fuel jets is decreased, and a surface area thereof is increased. As a result, NOx emissions of the pulverized solid fuel-fired furnace are substantially reduced and/or effectively minimized, as will hereinafter be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The SA shroud 110 is supported by supports 130 located between the SA shroud 110 and the PA shroud 120. Further, an SA duct 135 substantially surrounds the PA shroud 110. Specifically, the SA duct 135 includes spaces created between the supports 130 and the PA shroud top plate 124, the supports 130 and the PA shroud bottom plate 126, and spaces created between the supports 130 and the PA shroud side plates 122.
A primary air-pulverized solid fuel (PA-PSF) duct 150 is formed in a space created within the PA shroud side plates 122, the PA shroud top plate 124 and the PA shroud bottom plate 126. Splitter plates 160 are formed in the PA-PSF duct 150. As shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, such as illustrated in
Still referring to
A flow splitter 180 is disposed in the PA-PSF duct 150 between the splitter plates 160. In an exemplary embodiment, the flow splitter 180 is disposed approximately midway between ends of the curved portions of the splitter plates 160 (described in greater detail above). Further, the flow splitter 180 extends between the PA shroud side plates 122, as shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, the flow splitter 180 has a substantially triangular wedge shape in cross section, as shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The PA-PSF duct 150 of the nozzle tip 100 according to an exemplary embodiment is divided into three (3) chambers. Specifically, the PA-PSF duct 150 is divided into an upper PA-PSF chamber 260, a middle PA-PSF chamber 270 and a lower PA-PSF chamber 280. More specifically, the upper PA-PSF chamber 260 is defined by the PA shroud top plate 124 and an upper (with respect to
Operation of the nozzle tip 100 will now be described in further detail with reference to
Once inside the nozzle tip 100 and, more specifically, once inside the PA-PSF duct 150 of the nozzle tip 100, the PA-PSF inlet jet 230 is divided into three (3) separate jets, e.g., an upper PA-PSF jet 290, a middle PA-PSF jet 300 and a lower PA-PSF jet 310, as shown in
After traversing the PA-PSF duct 150, the upper PA-PSF jet 290, the middle PA-PSF jet 300 and the lower PA-PSF jet 310 exit the nozzle tip 100 at the nozzle tip outlet end 104 into the pulverized solid fuel-fired furnace (not shown). When exiting the nozzle tip 100, the upper PA-PSF jet 290, the middle PA-PSF jet 300 and the lower PA-PSF jet 310 exit the nozzle tip 100 form two (2) separate, e.g., discrete, jets, namely an upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and a lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330, as shown in
Thus, as can be seen in
The physical dimensions, shape, and placement of the splitter plates 160 and the flow splitter 180 within the PA-PSF duct 150, which result in the optimum division of the PA-PSF inlet jet 230 into the three (3) separate jets (as described above), further result in optimum formation of each of the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330 according to desired and/or actual operating conditions and characteristics of the pulverized solid fuel-fired furnace (not shown). For example, an initial separation distance between the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330, dimensions thereof (e.g., diameters), and a distance which the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330 travel after exiting the nozzle tip 100 before disbursing is determined base on the physical dimensions, shape, and placement of the splitter plates 160 and the flow splitter 180 within the PA-PSF duct 150.
Bent portions 340 on the PA shroud top plate 124 and the PA shroud bottom plate 126 near the nozzle tip outlet end 104 further prevent mixing of the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330 after leaving the nozzle tip 100. In an exemplary embodiment, the bent portions 340 bend outward, e.g., away from the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330 exiting the nozzle tip 100.
In an exemplary embodiment, the PA-PSF inlet jet 230 is evenly divided by the splitter plates 160 in the PA-PSF duct 150 such that the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330 each include approximately 50 percent of a total flow through the nozzle tip 100, e.g., each include approximately 50 percent of the PA-PSF inlet jet 230, but alternative exemplary embodiments are not limited thereto. Further, proportions of jet flow in the upper PA-PSF chamber 260, the middle PA-PSF chamber 270 and the lower PA-PSF chamber 280 may be substantially equally divided, e.g., each having approximately ⅓ of the total flow through the nozzle tip 100. However, alternative exemplary embodiments are not limited thereto; for example, proportions of jet flow in the upper PA-PSF chamber 260, the middle PA-PSF chamber 270 and the lower PA-PSF chamber 280 may be approximately 30 percent, approximately 40 percent and approximately 30 percent, respectively.
As described above in greater detail, the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330 are separate and discrete, and enter a combustion chamber of the pulverized solid fuel-fired furnace (not shown) through the nozzle tip outlet end 104 of the nozzle tip 100 as separate and discrete jets. Further, the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330 remain separate and discrete in the combustion chamber. Specifically, the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PA-PSF outlet jet 330 do not mix until traveling a predetermined distance after leaving the nozzle tip 100 according to an exemplary embodiment, as best shown in
In an alternative exemplary embodiment, the flow splitter 180 is omitted, as shown in
As a result of dividing the PA-PSF inlet jet 230 into separate jets, e.g., into the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330, a low pressure area is formed in a region substantially between the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330, relative to pressures of other areas substantially adjacent to (or even within) each of the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330. Thus, the low pressure area substantially between the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330 provides a low resistance path to permit a combustion flame to ignite the fuel (e.g., coal particles) disposed within the inner portion of the outlet fuel jet, thereby consuming oxygen therein. As a result, oxygen in the low pressure region is effectively depleted, resulting in less oxygen available for NOx formation, thereby substantially decreasing NOx emissions from a pulverized solid fuel-fired boiler having the nozzle tip according to an exemplary embodiment. Specifically, computational fluid dynamics modeling and combustion testing of a nozzle tip according to an exemplary embodiment suggest that concentrating the coal particles towards the outside of the coal stream is advantageous for reducing NOx emissions while minimizing unburned carbon levels. One will appreciate that this embodiment shown and described hereinbefore in
Dividing the PA-PSF inlet jet 230 into separate and discrete jets, e.g., into the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330, results in a low pressure area in a region substantially between the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330, relative to pressures of other areas substantially adjacent to (or even within) each of the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330. Thus, the low pressure area substantially between the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330 results in a combustion flame being drawn to the low pressure area, thereby consuming oxygen therein. As a result, oxygen in the low pressure region is effectively depleted, resulting in less oxygen available for NOx formation, thereby substantially decreasing NOx emissions from a pulverized solid fuel-fired boiler having the nozzle tip according to an exemplary embodiment.
In addition, dividing the PA-P SF inlet jet 230 into the separate and discrete jets, e.g., into the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330, further results in each of the separate and discrete jets having a decreased diameter relative to a diameter of the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320. More specifically, assuming a cross-sectional surface area A of the PA-PSF inlet jet 230 having a diameter a diameter D, the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330 each have a diameter D1=D/√{square root over (2)} (given that a summed cross-sectional surface area of an area of the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and an area of the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330 is equal to A). Thus, jet penetration for the separate and discrete jets (compared to a single jet of equivalent area) decreases while jet dispersion thereof increases, since jet penetration is directly proportional to jet diameter and jet dispersion is indirectly proportional to jet diameter.
Furthermore, a total wetted perimeter PT of the two separate and discrete jets having the diameter D1 is substantially increased or effectively improved as compared to a wetted perimeter P of a single jet, e.g., the PA-PSF inlet jet 230 having the cross-sectional area A. Specifically, the upper PA-PSF outlet jet 320 and the lower PS-PSF outlet jet 330, each having the diameter D1=D/√{square root over (2)} combine to yield a resultant total wetted perimeter PT=2(2*π*(D1/2))=√{square root over (2)}*P. As a result, jet dispersion, e.g., jet breakdown, is further increased. The increased total wetted perimeter of the separate and distinct jets allows for controlled amounts of air available at a near field of combustion in the combustion chamber to mix with pulverized solid fuel, thereby improving early flame stabilization and devolatilization. The increased total wetted perimeter also allows for improved mixing and recirculation of hot products of combustion over a greater area of the fuel jet, also resulting in improved early flame stabilization and early devolatilization of the fuel and/or fuel-bound nitrogen in an oxygen-limited, fuel-rich substoichiometric region of a near field of a region downstream of the nozzle tip 100.
Thus, the nozzle tip 100 according to exemplary embodiments described herein provides at least the advantages of decreased primary air/pulverized fuel jet penetration and increased primary air/pulverized fuel jet surface area, wetted area and dispersion, thereby enhancing early ignition, early flame stabilization, fuel devolatilization and early fuel bound nitrogen release. As a result, NOX emissions from a pulverized solid fuel-fired boiler having the nozzle tip in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention are substantially decreased or effectively reduced. The aforementioned advantages are apparent when implementing the nozzle tip according to an exemplary embodiment in a boiler designed to have reduced main burner zone (“MBZ”) stoichiometry, e.g., in a staged combustion environment in which it is desirable to initiate combustion closer to the nozzle tip (as compared to boilers having a high MBZ stoichiometry), but alternative exemplary embodiments are not limited thereto.
No simulation data was generated for the areas in white. In this case, it was the air passing through the secondary air nozzle 135.
A splitter plate 160 is positioned through the center of outlet 104 in both a vertical direction and a horizontal direction. Here the flow splitter 180 having a wedge shape having a base 483 and an apex edge 481. Flow splitter 180 is positioned at the center relative to the vertical and horizontal directions. It is also placed at the rear of the nozzle 100, flush with the outlet 104. This embodiment also includes air deflectors 175.
This embodiment includes multiple splitter plates 160 oriented in both the vertical and horizontal directions. Flow splitter 180 is enclosed with a flat base 481. The flow splitter 1800 is offset, or recessed inward away from the outlet 104 edge as compared with the flow splitter of
Outlet 104 has a general “X” shape, with the outlet 104 extending outward from a central location 108, into 4 outlet lobes 106 of outlet 104. Even though 4 lobes are shown here, any number of lobes radiating from the central location 108 envisioned by this invention.
A flow splitter 180 is positioned on a splitter plate 160 oriented horizontal across the nozzle 100 approximately evenly bisecting outlet 104 into an upper half and a lower half.
The flow splitter 180 has a leading section 181 and a trailing section 182 both inclines toward a center of the flow splitter both along its length and width. The leading section 181 has a 4-sided pyramid shape with a leading apex 183 and a base (not shown).
The trailing section [182] also is shaped like a 4-sided pyramid having an apex 184 and a base (not shown). In this embodiment, the bases of the pyramids are together with the apices pointing away from each other.
Each side of the leading section 181 of the flow splitter 180 are positioned, sized and angled to deflect incident flow toward its nearest outlet lobe 105. This effectively splits the flow into 4 components, one for each outlet lobe 106.
In an alternative embodiment, only a leading section 181 is used for the flow splitter 180. This may have a flat base, or be hollow.
Here the flow splitter 180 employs several diffusion blocks adjacent to each other on alternating sides of splitter plate 160.
A circular outlet 408 houses a rotor 470 on a rotor hub 480. An annular air duct 435 encircles the circular outlet 408.
These figures show a similar structure to that
While the invention has been described with reference to various exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The present invention claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/034,780, entitled “LOW NOx NOZZLE TIP”, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/034,796, entitled “LOW NOX NOZZLE TIP FOR A PULVERIZED SOLID FUEL FURNACE” both of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in there entirety herein.
The U.S. Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. DE-FC26-04NT42300 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4252069 | McCartney | Feb 1981 | A |
4274343 | Kokkinos | Jun 1981 | A |
4356975 | Chadshay | Nov 1982 | A |
4434727 | McCartney | Mar 1984 | A |
4520739 | McCartney et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4566393 | Connell et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4611543 | Collette | Sep 1986 | A |
4614159 | Sugiura et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4634054 | Grusha | Jan 1987 | A |
5315939 | Rini et al. | May 1994 | A |
6089171 | Fong et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6189812 | Buridant | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6439136 | Mann et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7216594 | Nowak et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20070234938 | Briggs, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0869313 | Oct 1998 | EP |
719008 | Feb 1932 | FR |
54159743 | Dec 1979 | JP |
04024404 | Jan 1992 | JP |
10332110 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2001082705 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002228107 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002228107 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2038535 | Jun 1995 | RU |
48027 | Sep 2005 | RU |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Mar. 15, 2010—(PCT/US2009/035801). |
Official Decision of Grant from the Patent Office of the Russian Federation on Aug. 20, 2013, for Russian Patent Application No. 201040953. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090277364 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61034780 | Mar 2008 | US | |
61034796 | Mar 2008 | US |