This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/655,000, filed Jan. 18, 2007, entitled “System and Method for Power Amplifier Output Power Control,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,137, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/654,744, filed Jan. 18, 2007, entitled “System and Method for Power Amplifier Output Power Control.”
The invention is related to envelope detectors, and more particularly to a low offset envelope detector and method of use.
Envelope detectors are known in the art. Envelope detectors can be used to generate an output signal representing the envelope level or amplitude of a high frequency input signal. This can be used in many applications, such as demodulating an amplitude modulated input signal, detecting the strength of a received radio frequency (RF) signal, detecting the level of a generated RF signal for use in amplitude leveling loops, detecting the level of a generated RF signal for use in an amplitude feedback loop such as in a polar modulator, or for other suitable applications.
A second terminal of rectifying transistor 101 is connected to holding capacitor 104 at an output node 108 and provided a bias current from bias current source 105. The second terminal of rectifying transistor 101 can be the source if rectifying transistor 101 is a FET, or the emitter if rectifying transistor 101 is a BJT. Holding capacitor 104 is selected such that the response time of the voltage at output node 108 is substantially slower than the period of frequency of the RF input. By using a nonlinear rectifying transistor 101, the average voltage at output node 108 can respond to the amplitude of the input RF signal.
Output node 108 can have a DC voltage even when the RF input amplitude is zero. For instance, if rectifying transistor 101 is a FET, the DC voltage at output node 108 can be approximately one threshold voltage below the bias voltage applied to the gate of rectifying transistor 101 when the RF input amplitude is zero. This DC offset can be detrimental if a small amplitude of the RF input is to be measured. Optional DC offset replica circuit 106, which can contain replicas of rectifying transistor 101 and bias current source 105, can be used to replicate this DC voltage. Optional subtracting amplifier 107 can then be used to remove this offset voltage from the output signal representing the detected envelope.
There are at least two different sources of offset, as shown by curve 201. One is caused by the DC bias point of the detector output not typically being zero, so that even when there is no RF input, the voltage at 108 is nonzero. This offset can be corrected using a replica circuit to generate the same DC value using like circuitry and subtracting this off of the detected value.
Nevertheless, curve 201 will remain at zero even for a small nonzero input amplitude, due to the signal level being too small to activate the nonlinearity of transistor 101. The detector output DC does not change until the amplitude gets large enough so that transistor 101 becomes nonlinear and begins to re-bias the voltage 108 in response to changes in input amplitude.
This offset voltage effect can be detrimental when very small input signals must be detected. The offset voltage can also degrade performance of systems even when the input RF amplitude is typically high enough that the envelope detector is operating in the linear region, because the output in this region is proportional to the input amplitude minus the effective offset voltage. In systems such as polar feedback loops, it can be necessary that this offset voltage be nearly zero. An RF amplifier could be used to increase the amplitude of the RF input signal presented to the envelope detector in order to reduce this effect, but the application of an RF amplifier in this manner can cause other issues, such as saturation of the RF signal when higher amplitudes are present, and nonlinearity of the input to output response of the amplifier.
Therefore, it is desirable to have an envelope detector which can detect the amplitude of an input RF signal with reduced offset voltage.
In particular, an envelope detector is provided which generates a low offset when small signal amplitudes are received at the input of the envelope detector.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a system for processing a signal is provided. The system includes a differential amplifier receiving a radio-frequency input signal at a first differential input. A rectifying device such as a transistor has a control terminal that is coupled to an output of the differential amplifier and an output that is coupled to a second differential input of the differential amplifier. The second differential input of the differential amplifier receives a low frequency feedback signal from the output of the rectifying device, such as by damping the frequency response at the output of the rectifying device using a capacitor and a current source coupled to the output of the rectifying device.
The present invention provides many important technical advantages. One important technical advantage of the present invention is a system utilizing an envelope detector with a low offset at low magnitude inputs, so as to avoid generation of a non-linear response between the input amplitude and the output voltage.
Those skilled in the art will further appreciate the advantages and superior features of the invention together with other important aspects thereof on reading the detailed description that follows in conjunction with the drawings.
In the description which follows, like parts are marked throughout the specification and drawing with the same reference numerals, respectively. The drawing figures may not be to scale and certain components may be shown in generalized or schematic form and identified by commercial designations in the interest of clarity and conciseness.
Differential amplifier 301 receives an RF input signal at a first input through capacitor 302 and a bias voltage through resistor 303. Differential amplifier 301 is configured so that the input RF signal is amplified at the output of differential amplifier 301. Differential amplifier 301 receives a feedback signal generated by rectifying device 304 at a second input. The feedback signal is related to detected signal level. Differential amplifier 301 is configured so that the voltage presented at its second input is amplified at its output.
The output of differential amplifier 301 is coupled to a first terminal of rectifying device 304. The first terminal of rectifying device 304 can be a gate if rectifying device 304 is a FET, a base if rectifying device 304 is a BJT, or other suitable control terminals. A second terminal of rectifying device 304 is connected to capacitor 305 at an output node 309 and provided a bias current from current source 306. The second terminal of rectifying device 304 can be the source if rectifying device 304 is a FET, or the emitter if rectifying device 304 is a BJT. The size of capacitor 305 can be selected so that the response time of the voltage at output node 309 is substantially slower than the period of frequency of the RF input. By using a nonlinearity of rectifying device 304, the average voltage at output node 309 can respond to the amplitude of the RF signal present at the first terminal of rectifying device 304. The feedback signal provided to the second input of differential amplifier 301 can be the signal at output node 309 or another suitable signal derived from the signal at output node 309, such as a divided or amplified signal.
Optional replica circuit 307 can include a mirror duplicate of rectifying device 304, differential amplifier 301 and current source 306, that is used to replicate a DC offset voltage. Optional subtracting amplifier 308 can then be used to remove this offset voltage from the output signal representing the detected envelope. The detected signal can then be provided as an indication of the detected envelope to a device 310, such as a cellular telephone receiver, a cellular telephone transmitter, a polar transmission loop, a broadband wireless transceiver, television set, computer, or other suitable devices.
The use of differential amplifier 301 receiving a low frequency feedback signal from output node 309 can have benefit by reducing the offset voltage associated with the limited nonlinearity of rectifying device 304 when presented with small input signals. Because differential amplifier 301 can have signal gain at the frequency of the RF input signal, the amplitude at the first terminal of rectifying device 304 can have a larger amplitude than if differential amplifier 301 were not used. This signal gain can improve the offset voltage when small amplitude signals are present at the RF input.
The use of a feedback signal into the second input of differential amplifier 301 can provide the benefit of avoiding saturation at the peak of the amplified RF signal, which can occur at the output of differential amplifier 301 such as may occur if an amplifier with no feedback signal is used. Differential amplifier 301 can be configured to subtract the amplified feedback signal from the amplified input RF signal at its output. Since the feedback signal can increase as the input RF amplitude increases, the peak value of the signal at the output of differential amplifier 301 can increase less with increasing RF input signal amplitude than without using the feedback signal. In this manner, envelope detector 300 can be used at higher levels of input amplitude than if a conventional RF amplifier were used.
Differential amplifier 401 receives an RF input signal at a first input through capacitor 402 and a bias voltage through resistor 403. Differential amplifier 401 is configured so that the input RF signal is amplified at its output. Differential amplifier 401 receives a feedback signal generated by rectifying device 404 at a second input that is related to detected signal level. Differential amplifier 401 is configured so that the voltage presented at its second input is amplified at its output.
The output of differential amplifier 401 is coupled to a first terminal of rectifying device 404. The first terminal of rectifying device 404 can be a gate if rectifying device 404 is a FET, or a base if rectifying device 404 is a BJT. A second terminal of rectifying device 404 is connected to capacitor 405 at an output node 409 and is provided a bias current from bias current source 406. The second terminal of rectifying device 404 can be the drain if rectifying device 404 is a FET, or the collector if rectifying device 404 is a BJT. Capacitor 405 controls the response time of the change in voltage at output node 409 so that it is substantially slower than the period of frequency of the RF input. By using a nonlinear response of rectifying device 404, the average current provided by rectifying device 404 into output node 409 can respond to the amplitude of the RF signal present at the first terminal of rectifying device 404. The feedback signal provided to the second input of differential amplifier 401 can be the signal at output node 409 or another suitable signal derived from the signal at output node 409, such as a divided or amplified signal.
Envelope detector 400 can produce an output related to the amplitude of the input RF signal. The current provided by rectifying device 404 can increase with increasing amplitude of the RF input signal due to a nonlinearity of rectifying device 404. The difference between this current and bias current source 406 can flow into capacitor 405, so that the difference in current can result in an output signal at output node 409 which is the current difference integrated with respect to time.
Differential amplifier 401 allows an increasing feedback signal present at its second input to result in a change in output voltage effecting a reduction in the average current of rectifying device 404. For instance, if rectifying device 404 is a p-type FET, differential amplifier 401 can cause the voltage at the gate of rectifying device 404 to increase with increasing voltage at output node 409. The feedback through the second terminal of differential amplifier 401 can reach a steady state so that the additional current induced by the amplitude of the input RF signal can be compensated by a reduced current due to the feedback signal, to provide an output signal that increases as the amplitude of the RF signal increases.
Optional replica circuit 407, which can contain replicas of rectifying device 404, differential amplifier 401 and bias current source 406, or other suitable devices, can be used to replicate a DC offset voltage. Optional subtracting amplifier 408 can then be used to remove this offset voltage from the output signal representing the detected envelope.
Envelope detector 400 provides similar linearity benefits as envelope detector 300. Any offset voltage resulting from insufficient nonlinearity of rectifying device 404 can be reduced by the RF gain of differential amplifier 401. Feedback to the second terminal of differential amplifier 401 can be used to ensure that peaks of the RF signal do not cause saturation at the output of differential amplifier 401 for large amplitude input RF signals. Envelope detector 400 can provide the additional benefit of increasing the effectiveness of the feedback loop through differential amplifier 401 due to increased gain from configuring output node 409 as an integrator.
In one embodiment, rectifying device 404 is configured so that its third terminal is a source or an emitter connected to fixed voltage, such as ground or a supply voltage. This can have the benefit of reducing the variation of the voltage level required to be generated by differential amplifier 401. Since the instantaneous current generated by rectifying device 404 can be a function of the difference in the voltages at the device's first terminal and the fixed voltage at the device's third terminal, the steady state condition can be such that the voltage levels present at the first terminal of rectifying device 404 which produce the rectified current can be similar over a wide range of amplitude of the RF input, which can provide the benefit of reducing the requirements of differential amplifier 401 to produce a wide range of output voltage.
Differential amplifier 401 can be implemented using transistors 501, 502 and 504, resistors 505, 506 and 507, and capacitor 508. Transistors 501, 502 and 504 can be FETs, BJTs, or other suitable devices. Transistors 501 and 502 form a differential pair by connecting a source terminal of transistor 501 with a source terminal of transistor 502. Transistors 501 and 502 are provided a bias current from bias current source 503. Transistor 501 is configured to receive the RF input signal through capacitor 402, while transistor 502 is configured to receive the feedback signal from output node 409. Resistor 505 receives an amplified current from transistor 502 to generate a voltage, which is provided to a gate, base or other suitable control terminal of transistor 504. A drain, collector or other suitable terminal of transistor 504 is connected to a drain, collector or other suitable terminal of transistor 501 to produce a voltage. This voltage is applied to a first terminal of resistor 506 and a first terminal of capacitor 508. The second terminal of resistor 506, the second terminal of capacitor 508, and a first terminal of resistor 507 are connected to form an output node, which is coupled to the first terminal of rectifying device 404. The second terminal of resistor 507 can be connected to a supply voltage or another suitable voltage.
Differential amplifier 401 can amplify the RF input signal through transistor 501 and capacitor 508. This short signal path provides the benefit of reducing the coupling of the RF signal to capacitive devices or intrinsic capacitances, such as may occur in a multi-stage amplifier. This reduction in capacitance can provide a high gain relative to the supply current used.
The feedback signal can be amplified through transistor 502, resistor 505, transistor 504, and resistor 506. Resistor 507 can be used to modify the gain from transistor 504 to the first terminal of rectifying device 404, such as to modify the DC level of the voltage present at the drain or collector of transistor 504, which helps to avoid transistor 504 entering a triode operation region if transistor 504 is a FET, or to avoid transistor 504 going into saturation if transistor 504 is a BJT. Capacitor 508 can be used to bypass resistor 506 in order to achieve a higher gain at the frequency of the RF input signal.
In one alternate embodiment, resistor 505 can be replaced with a diode-connected transistor. This can have benefit by reducing the circuit size if envelope detector 500 is implemented in an integrated circuit. It can also have benefit by reducing the loop gain variation due to mismatch between resistor 505 and transistor 504.
In view of the above detailed description of the present invention and associated drawings, other modifications and variations are apparent to those skilled in the art. It is also apparent that such other modifications and variations may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3098200 | Jensen | Jul 1963 | A |
3157839 | Brown | Nov 1964 | A |
3430157 | Wood | Feb 1969 | A |
3449685 | Holmes | Jun 1969 | A |
3652947 | Hollingsworth | Mar 1972 | A |
3703685 | Simopoulos et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3919656 | Sokal et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3919660 | Beurrier | Nov 1975 | A |
3967161 | Lichtblau | Jun 1976 | A |
4117415 | Hoover | Sep 1978 | A |
4165493 | Harrington | Aug 1979 | A |
4181889 | Davis et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4283685 | MacMaster et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4305043 | Ho et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4330754 | Hartley | May 1982 | A |
4607323 | Sokal et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4694261 | Ewen et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4706038 | Navidi et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4717884 | Mitzlaff | Jan 1988 | A |
4772856 | Nojima et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4916410 | Littlefield | Apr 1990 | A |
4994755 | Titus et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994760 | Roehrs | Feb 1991 | A |
5060298 | Waugh et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066925 | Freitag | Nov 1991 | A |
5115204 | Tomonaga | May 1992 | A |
5130664 | Pavlic et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5146178 | Nojima et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5208725 | Akcasu | May 1993 | A |
5223800 | Karsten, Jr. et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5254881 | Leonowich | Oct 1993 | A |
5327337 | Cripe | Jul 1994 | A |
5389890 | Burrage | Feb 1995 | A |
5469115 | Peterzell et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477370 | Little et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479134 | Nishioka et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5483197 | Nishioka et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5525871 | Bray et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5600575 | Anticole | Feb 1997 | A |
5612647 | Malec | Mar 1997 | A |
5698469 | Mohwinkel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5742205 | Cowen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749051 | Dent | May 1998 | A |
5781071 | Kusunoki | Jul 1998 | A |
5793253 | Kumar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5825248 | Ozawa | Oct 1998 | A |
5872481 | Sevic et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5920240 | Alexanian et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926068 | Harr | Jul 1999 | A |
5939766 | Stolmeijer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973557 | Miyaji et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6008703 | Perrott et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011438 | Kakuta et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020787 | Kim et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6057571 | Miller et al. | May 2000 | A |
6107885 | Miguelez et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114911 | Iwai et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121842 | Adlerstein et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121843 | Vampola et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137354 | Dacus et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160455 | French et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6203516 | Kepley | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211728 | Chen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211747 | Trichet et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229718 | Nilssen | May 2001 | B1 |
6232841 | Bartlett et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252455 | Kurby et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6320913 | Nakayama | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351185 | Amrany et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369651 | Dent | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383858 | Gupta et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385033 | Javanifard et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400227 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408168 | Sessink | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417535 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424227 | El-Sharawy | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430403 | Kossor | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445248 | Gilbert | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448847 | Paul et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6498534 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509722 | Lopata | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6538510 | Amrany et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549112 | Gallina et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556089 | Wood | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6577219 | Visser | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6653891 | Hazucha | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6707367 | Casteneda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717998 | Adachi et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724255 | Kee et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6756849 | Dupuis et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762645 | Grant | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6784732 | Hajimiri et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798305 | Aikawa et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809586 | Hobboosh et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812771 | Behel et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6815910 | Suzuki | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816012 | Aoki et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825726 | French et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6856199 | Komijani et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6909882 | Hayashi et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917245 | Dupuis et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6940355 | Hajimiri et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6982605 | Mondal et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999747 | Su | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7058374 | Levesque et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062237 | Brandt | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092692 | Tan et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095819 | Bellaouar et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7129784 | Bhatti et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7224237 | Hirano et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7272375 | Tuttle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274253 | Pan | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276966 | Tham et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7330072 | Brandt | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20020042256 | Baldwin et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020125945 | Taylor | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135422 | Aoki et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020173337 | Hajimiri et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003952 | Kim | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021367 | Smith | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045263 | Wakayama et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030130006 | Reynolds | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169113 | Komijani et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184369 | Aoki et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040081256 | Shi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040178852 | Neunaber | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050064840 | Heydari et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070325 | Bellaouar et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107043 | Avasarala et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050212791 | Tsuchi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060066396 | Brandt | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068734 | Toyoda et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060103457 | Kumar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115018 | Kang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070170989 | Pan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080012602 | Presti et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
12 76 764 | Sep 1968 | DE |
0 379 202 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0 430 707 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0 458 071 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0 556 398 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 643 494 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0 961 412 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1 345 375 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 413 073 | Oct 1965 | FR |
2 126 816 | Mar 1984 | GB |
06-224605 | Aug 1994 | JP |
2917949 | Jul 1998 | JP |
2001-44862 | Feb 2001 | JP |
WO 9702654 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9722177 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 0106644 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0156171 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2005098880 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090015328 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |