The present disclosure relates generally to surface-controlled subsurface safety valves (also called “SCSSVs”) in a subterranean wellbore, and more specifically to electrically-powered surface-controlled subsurface safety valves in a subterranean wellbore.
In the production of oil and gas using a wellbore, safety valves are almost always required to be installed within the wellbore. The safety valves are designed to isolate the wellbore in the event of an operational condition that can result in damage at or near the surface. The operation of safety valves can become problematic in deep-water wells, where thousands of feet of hydrostatic pressure can build up even before entering the wellbore. Existing safety valves operate using hydraulics, Nitrogen, and/or magnets.
Some conventional hydraulic safety valves may have limited setting depths unless nitrogen balance pressures are used to offset the effects of high head pressures. The deeper a conventional safety valve is set, the higher the forces will be acting on the hydraulic piston. Eventually, the fail-safe power spring used to return the flow tube (and allow the flapper to close) may not be strong enough to lift the column of fluid acting on the hydraulic piston. Nitrogen has been used in the past to offset this effect. However, valves designed with nitrogen charge pressure may have the added disadvantage of operational variation with temperature and the potential of lost gas pressure.
Some conventional hydraulic safety valves also may have slow closure response times. When the hydraulic pressure is relieved on the safety valve (in an emergency condition), the time required to move the hydraulic fluid through the small diameter control line could be longer than desired. This presents operational, and sometimes regulatory, risks during operation.
Existing electric safety valves have significant power requirements to either drive motors, or hold solenoids in position to function properly. High power requirements generate significant heat which results in waste and may lead to premature component failure during the life of the well.
Therefore, there is a need for an improved safety valve system to solve the problem of hydrostatic pressure and depth limitations as well as minimize the power required to operate electric safety valves. By using an electric actuator and eliminating the need for a hydraulic control line, problems associated with depth and pressure can be mitigated. Slow response time is also mitigated because the safety valve is able to close almost instantaneously. Further, power required to hold open such safety valve system is reduced, in turn reducing component failure and power waste.
One aspect of the present invention relates to a subsurface safety valve system for a wellbore. The safety valve system may include a tubular housing disposed within the wellbore having a cavity running in a longitudinal direction therethrough. The safety valve system may further include a power generation source which generates electric power, an electromagnetic device which receives the electric power generated by the power generation device to create a magnetic field, and a flapper operative to open and close the cavity in response to the electric power received by the electromagnetic device. The flapper may open in response to the electric power exceeding a first electric power value and may remain open in response to the electric power exceeding a second electric power value. The first electric power value may be greater than the second electric power value.
In one embodiment, the flapper may close in response to the electric power being less than or equal to the second electric power value.
In another embodiment, the electromagnetic device may comprise a coil.
In still another embodiment, the electromagnetic device may comprise a plurality of coils.
In still another embodiment the electromagnetic device may be in fluid isolation from the cavity.
In still another embodiment, the electromagnetic device may be isolated from the cavity by metal-to-metal static seals.
In still another embodiment, the safety valve system may further include a coil chamber containing the electromagnetic device. The coil chamber may be pressure balanced with the cavity.
In still another embodiment, the safety valve system may further include a coil chamber containing the electromagnetic device. The coil chamber may be pressure balanced with an annulus surrounding the tubular housing.
Another aspect of the present invention also relates to a safety valve system for a wellbore. The safety valve system may include a tubular housing disposed within the wellbore having a cavity running in a longitudinal direction therethrough. The safety valve system may also include a flow tube disposed within the housing and containing magnetic cores. The safety valve system may also include a power spring coupled to the flow tube so as to bias the flow tube toward an upper end of the tubular housing. The safety valve system may also include a power generation source which generates electric power. The safety valve system may also include an electromagnetic device offset in a longitudinal direction from the magnetic core. The electromagnetic device may be configured to receive the electric power generated by the power generation device to exert a magnetic force on the magnetic element toward a lower end of the tubular housing. The safety valve system may also include a flapper located within the tubular housing operative to open the cavity in response to displacement of the flow tube from a first position to a second position. The flow tube may be displaced from the first position to the second position in response to the electric power exceeding a first electric power value. The flow tube may remain displaced in the second position in response to the electric power exceeding a second electric power value. The first electric power value may be greater than the second electric power value.
In one embodiment, the safety valve system may include a retention mechanism which engages the flow tube to the tubular housing in response to the flow tube being displaced in the second position.
In another embodiment, the retention mechanism may include one or more retention balls configured to catch in a detent in the flow tube in response to the flow tube being displaced in the second position.
In still another embodiment, the electromagnetic device may be in fluid isolation in the coil chamber from the wellbore.
In still another embodiment, the flapper may be closed when the flow tube is in the first position.
In still another embodiment, the safety valve system may include a coil chamber containing the electromagnetic device, wherein the coil chamber is pressure balanced with an annulus surrounding the tubular housing.
In still another aspect of the present invention, a method of using the safety valve system as described herein may include a step of dithering the electric power such that the electric power does not fall below the second electric power value.
In another embodiment, the flow tube may be electrically vibrated while the cavity is open to allow the cavity to be closed.
In still another embodiment, the flow tube may be electrically vibrated while the cavity is closed to allow the cavity to be opened.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given below and from the accompanying drawings. The drawings are intended to disclose but a few possible examples of the present invention, and thus do not limit the present invention's scope.
The present invention generally relates to an improved electrically-powered, surface-controlled subsurface safety valve system for use in a subterranean wellbore. Preferred examples of the subsurface safety valve system described in detail below are useful specifically in the context of oil and gas drilling and wells. However, the examples described below may also be applicable to other high pressure fluidics applications.
A sectional view of one example embodiment of a subsurface safety valve system in accordance with the present invention is shown in
The armature housing 104 contains armatures which may reside in one or more coil chambers within the armature housing 104. In a particular embodiment as shown in
The armature housing 104 may further contain armature spacers 114, 116, and 118 separating the armatures 110 and 112 from the ends of the armature housing 104 and from each other. The armatures 110 and 112 and the armature spacers 114, 116, and 118 are preferably tubular in shape or otherwise shaped to nest within the tubular armature housing 104. When the armatures 110 and 112 are energized with electrical power from the electrical termination 128, a magnetic flux circulates around each armature.
The example embodiment shown in
The length of the armatures themselves may vary as other dimensions, such as diameter of the safety valve assembly 100, vary. Preferably, the length of the armatures is three times the distance traveled by the flow tube when transitioning between an open and a closed state.
To prevent deformation of the structure, the coil chambers in which the armatures 110 and 112 reside are preferably pressure balanced to the flow tube. Pressure balancing may be achieved by a balance piston. The coil chambers may alternatively be pressure balanced to an annulus surrounding the tubular housing which includes armature housing 104.
The safety valve assembly 100 further includes a flapper 130 toward a lower end of the assembly. As used herein, the term upper end refers to an end of the safety valve assembly 100 furthest from the flapper 130 and the term upward refers to a direction pointing from the flapper 130 to the upper end. Also as used herein, the term lower end refers to an end of the safety valve assembly 100 closest to the flapper 130 and the term downward refers to a direction pointing from the upper end to the lower end.
For purposes of more detailed diagrams,
A detailed sectional view of an upper section and a middle section of the safety valve assembly 100 is shown in
The distance each core is offset toward the upper end of the safety valve assembly 100 in a longitudinal direction from its respective armature may be empirically determined and a variety of offset distances may be used depending on design criteria. As one example, each core may be offset toward the upper end of the safety valve assembly 100 in a longitudinal direction from its respective armature such that two-thirds of the length of the core protrudes from the armature.
Two cores 122 and 124 are shown in
The cores 122 and 124 are preferably formed from a material with high magnetic permeability and high magnetic saturation. Such a material may include “electrical iron,” which may be sold under a variety of trade names.
A detailed sectional view of a lower section of the safety valve assembly 100 is shown in
A lower flow tube 150 is disposed within the armature housing 104 and the spring housing 106. Lower flow tube 150 may be nested within a receiving end 170 of the upper flow tube 120. Together, the lower flow tube 150 and the upper flow tube 120 define a channel 180 through which oil or gas (or other product) is transported. The channel is opened or closed by the flapper 130.
The lower flow tube 150 is biased toward an upper end of the safety valve assembly 100 by a power spring 142. Power spring 142 is preferably located along an outside surface of the lower flow tube 150 and within the spring housing 106. Power spring 142 may abut a shouldered edge of spring housing 106 at one axial end and spring spacer 144 on its other axial end, the spring spacer 144 being fixed to the lower flow tube 150.
A balance spring 162 urges the lower flow tube 150 and the upper flow tube 120 in opposite directions; the lower flow tube 150 being urged downward. The balance spring 162 is preferably located along an outside surface of the lower flow tube 150 and within the spring housing 106. The balance spring 162 is oriented between a flow tube adapter 166 at one axial end and a spring ring 164 at its other axial end, the spring ring 164 being fixed to the lower flow tube 150. The flow tube adapter 166 may be fixed at one end to the upper flow tube 120 by set screws 168 or by another suitable fixing mechanism. The flow tube adapter 166 is coupled at its other end to a catch coupler 160 which is part of a ball catch mechanism.
The ball catch mechanism consists of the catch coupler 160 to which ball catch sleeve 152 is attached via guide screws 158, or another suitable mechanism allowing longitudinal displacement of the ball catch sleeve 152 relative to the catch coupler 160. A catch spring 156 is oriented between the catch coupler 160 and ball catch sleeve 152 so as to urge them in opposite directions. The ball catch mechanism further includes retention balls 146 which are seated within ball cage 148 which is in turn fixed to the lower flow tube 150. The retention balls 146 may freely rotate within the ball cage 148 and roll along an inner surface of the armature housing 104, but may not be displaced relative to the ball cage 148 or the lower flow tube 150.
To illustrate basic functionality of the safety valve assembly 100,
In comparison,
Actuation of movement of the upper flow tube 120 and the lower flow tube 150, and consequently opening/closing of the flapper 130 using electrical power will be described with reference to
In
In
In
In
In
When the ball catch sleeve 152 covers the retention balls 146 sitting in the detent 154, the lower flow tube 150 is prevented from moving longitudinally. The upward force of the power spring 142 acting on the lower flow tube 150 can thus be fully, or at least substantially counteracted by a downward normal force of the retention balls 146 acting on the surface of the detent 154 in lower flow tube 150. Accordingly, the electrical power supplied to the armatures to generate a magnetic force acting on the cores in a downward direction may be reduced while maintaining the open condition of the flapper 130. To maintain the flapper 130 in an open position with the retention balls 146 covered in the detent 154, the electric power supplied to the armatures need only be sufficient to generate a magnetic force to maintain the balance spring 162 in a compressed state such that the ball catch sleeve 152 continues to cover the retention balls 146. When the ball catch sleeve 152 covers the retention balls 146, the electrical power supplied to the armatures need not counteract the upward force of the power spring 142 to keep lower flow tube 150 in a downward-most position and the flapper 130 open.
In
An example embodiment as described above uses retention balls 146 to lock the lower flow tube 150 to the tubular housing, but the invention is not limited to embodiments employing retention balls as described above and as shown. Alternate embodiments may use dogs in lieu of balls and may further employ solenoids to temporarily lock the balls or dogs to the flow tube. Alternatively, other mechanisms may be used to reduce the power required to hold open the safety valve, such as a mechanism which locks the flow tube upon rotation once the flapper is opened.
For example, in another embodiment, a radial collet mechanism may be used.
As another example, in another embodiment, a longitudinal collet mechanism may be used.
A method of using the safety valve assembly above may include dithering the electrical power supplied to the armatures at values sufficient to move the flow tube slightly against the compression force of the springs. After long periods without a change in state, the flow tube in the safety valve assembly may stick to the tubular housing as a result of the product travelling within the flow tube. By dithering the electric power provided to the armatures at values below the electric power required to open the flapper, a vibration of the flow tube with respect to the surrounding tubular housing occurs. The result of the vibration is to enable motion when substances or conditions may cause the flow tube to stick in either the open or closed position. Dithering may be used when the safety valve assembly is in an open state, a closed state, is opening, or is closing. Dithering may reduce the electrical power necessary to operate the safety valve.
The advantages of the embodiment described above are several. A major advantage is that the electrical power required to hold open the flapper may be reduced substantially. Electric power alone is used initially to generate sufficient magnetic force acting on the flow tube to open the flapper. However, once the flapper is opened, the electrically-generated force required to maintain the flapper in an open position is supplemented by a simple mechanical force applied by the retention balls, or the like, which requires no additional power input. The electric power supplied to the armatures can thus be reduced while maintaining the flapper in an open position, reducing heat generated in the system as well as power consumed.
Another advantage provided by the invention is that the design is simple and less susceptible to failure than, for instance, a safety valve employing an electric motor to drive flow tubes and open a flapper. Because moving parts are minimized, fewer components are susceptible to wear. The use of electrical actuation also mitigates the delays and limitations associated with hydraulically operated safety valves. Interrupting the power transmitted to the armatures causes the safety valve to close virtually instantaneously, whereas a hydraulically-operated safety valve located at a significant depth would remain open for a longer period of time before the column of hydraulic fluid could be lifted. Furthermore, the implementation of multiple armature and core pairs as described above provides multiple redundant and independent actuation systems. If one armature were to fail, the one or more other armatures could continue to be used to actuate the safety valve.
Still another advantage of the invention is that requires only metal-to-metal static seals. Conventional safety valves of either hydraulic or electric type utilize dynamic seals, elastomeric seals, or thermoplastic seals to accommodate a greater number of moving parts. Such seals are either exposed to corrosive materials in the production tubing or are subjected to degradation from reciprocation. Further, they are frequently made from less durable materials than metals. The elimination of these types of seals in exchange for metal-to-metal static seals in the present invention serve to extend the useful life of the safety valve.
While a particular embodiment has been described, other embodiments are plausible. It should be understood that the foregoing description of an improved subsurface safety valve system is not intended to be limiting, and any number of modifications, combinations, and alternatives to the example described above may be employed.
The example described herein is merely illustrative, as numerous other embodiments may be implemented without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Moreover, while certain features of the invention may be described above only in the context of certain examples or configurations, these features may be exchanged, added, and removed from and between various embodiments or configurations while remaining within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4002202 | Huebsch et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4407329 | Huebsch et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4566534 | Going, III | Jan 1986 | A |
4579177 | Going, III | Apr 1986 | A |
4585067 | Blizzard | Apr 1986 | A |
4649993 | Going, III | Mar 1987 | A |
4749043 | Rodenberger | Jun 1988 | A |
4796708 | Lembcke | Jan 1989 | A |
4798247 | Deaton et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4886114 | Perkins et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4981172 | Haerle | Jan 1991 | A |
4981173 | Perkins | Jan 1991 | A |
5070595 | Perkins | Dec 1991 | A |
5070944 | Hopper | Dec 1991 | A |
5257663 | Pringle et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5293551 | Perkins et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
6253843 | Rawson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269874 | Rawson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283217 | Deaton | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6325153 | Harrell | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6433991 | Deaton | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6619388 | Dietz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
8857522 | Arrazola et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20060278395 | Kenison | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090090501 | Hansen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090229814 | Going, III | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20130105149 | Williamson, Jr. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140009009 | Deguchi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140262323 | Cox | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20170002945 | Phelps | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20190203564 | Henschel, Jr. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report & Written Opinion (PCT/US2018/014511), dated May 17, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190203564 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |