Patent Grant
8122969
This invention relates to fire protection sprinklers, and more particularly to upright-type fire protection sprinklers for extended coverage applications.
The present National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard governing minimum requirements for design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems is the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13 entitled “Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems,” the complete disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. According to the National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 13 was first issued in 1896 under direction of the NFPA Committee on Automatic Sprinklers. The standard is periodically revised and updated as new information and technology become available.
The 1999 Edition of NFPA 13 recognizes various classes of occupancies, termed: “Light Hazard,” “Ordinary Hazard,” “Extra Hazard,” and “Special Occupancy Hazard,” as well as various types of storage commodity classes, including: “Miscellaneous Storage” and “High-Piled Storage,” the latter being categorized as including solid-piled, palletized, rack storage, bin box, and shelf storage in excess of twelve feet in height. NFPA 13 specifies the various levels of protection requirements for automatic fire sprinkler systems in these different types of occupancies, based, e.g., on severity of the potential fire hazard.
As generally defined by NFPA 13, Light Hazard occupancies are those where the quantity and/or combustibility of contents are low and fires with relatively low rates of heat release are expected. Ordinary Hazard covers those occupancies where the quantity and/or combustibility of the contents is equal to or greater than that of Light Hazard, ranging from low to high, where the quantity of combustibles is moderate and stock piles do not exceed twelve feet, such that fires with moderate to high rates of heat release are expected. Extra Hazard occupancies are those where quantity and combustibility of the contents are very high, and flammable or combustible liquids, dust, lint or other materials are present, such that the probability of rapidly developing fires with high rates of heat release is very high.
NFPA 13 does not specifically define Miscellaneous Storage and High-Piled Storage occupancies in terms of quantity and combustibility of material contents. Rather, it specifies various levels of fire protection requirements based on the type (combustibility) of materials (e.g., metal, paper, wood, plastics, rubber, etc.), amount of material, height of storage, and clearance between the top of the storage and the ceiling, as well as how the materials are stored (e.g., palletized, rack storage, solid-piled, etc.) and the method of packaging (e.g., cartoned, uncartoned, encapsulated, etc.).
NFPA 13 specifies maximum areas of protection per sprinkler for the various hazard occupancies. For example, in the case of a hydraulically calculated standard spray upright or pendent sprinkler system, the maximum protection area per sprinkler is: 225 square feet for a Light Hazard application with unobstructed ceiling construction; 130 square feet for an Ordinary Hazard application with all types of approved ceiling construction; and 100 square feet for Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage applications with a water discharge density requirement equal to or greater than 0.25 gallon per minute per square foot, for any type of approved ceiling construction. The maximum area of protection per sprinkler for Miscellaneous Storage is determined by its Ordinary Hazard or Extra Hazard classification. This invention is specifically directed to protection of at least Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage occupancies.
NFPA 13 also defines the protection area of a sprinkler as being at least rectangular (it may be square) and equal to:
S×L
where: S represents the greater of the distance from the sprinkler in question to the farthest spaced, immediately adjoining sprinkler, upstream or downstream, on the same supply line, or twice the distance from the sprinkler in question to a wall where the sprinkler in question is the last sprinkler on a supply line extending in a direction towards the wall, and L represents the greater of the perpendicular distance to the farthest spaced branch line immediately adjoining either lateral side of the branch line supporting the sprinkler in question, or twice the perpendicular distance to the farthest spaced wall immediately adjoining either side of the branch line which supports the sprinkler in question and which lacks an immediately adjoining branch line between it and the wall.
For example, in the case of a hydraulically calculated standard spray upright or pendent sprinkler system, the maximum spacing between sprinklers is: 15 feet for a Light Hazard application with unobstructed ceiling construction and for an Ordinary Hazard application with all types of approved ceiling construction; and 12 feet for Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage applications with the water discharge requirement being equal to or greater than 0.25 gallon per minute per square foot.
A standard spray sprinkler, in either an upright or pendent deflector configuration, discharges a hemispherical-like pattern below the sprinkler deflector. Standard spray sprinklers are defined by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (“UL”) as having a nominal K Factor in the range from 1.4 to 11.2 where:
Q=K√P
where: P represents the pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway through the body of the sprinkler, in pounds per square inch gauge (psig); Q represents the flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway through the body of the sprinkler, in gallons per minute (gpm); and K represents the nominal K-factor constant in units of gallons per minute divided by the square root of pressure expressed in psig.
The maximum allowable spacing and minimum water discharge requirements for standard spray upright and pendent sprinklers are prescribed by NFPA 13 based on fire tests suitable to the selected hazard performed on like type sprinklers. Consequently, Listing agencies such as Underwriters Laboratories Inc. evaluate standard spray upright and pendent sprinklers to a set series of sprinkler performance tests at established spacing and water discharge values, to validate that the sprinklers will be suitable for use in applications prescribed in NFPA 13.
By comparison, extended coverage sprinklers, which are considered by NFPA 13 to be a type of Special Sprinkler and intended for the protection of areas greater than those for standard spray sprinklers, for an equivalent hazard, must be evaluated in a series of fire tests related to the intended hazard, at maximum sprinkler spacing and minimum water discharge requirements specified by the manufacturer. These fire tests established by the Listing agency (e.g., UL) are in addition to whatever water distribution, thermo-sensitivity, mechanical property, and environmental resistance tests are deemed appropriate, and which would also be applied to standard spray upright and pendent sprinklers.
In 1973, Section 4-1.1.1.3 was adopted and incorporated into NFPA 13, stating: “Special sprinklers may be installed with larger protection areas or distance between sprinklers than are specified in sections 4-2 and 4-5 when installed in accordance with the approvals or listing of a testing laboratory.” At the time, Sections 4-2 and 4-5 defined the maximum spacing and protection areas indicated above, for standard spray sprinklers.
In 1987 that section of NFPA 13 was amended to read: “Special sprinklers-installation of special sprinklers with protection areas, locations and distances between sprinklers differing from those specified . . . shall be permitted when found suitable for such use based on fire tests related to hazard category, tests to evaluate distribution, wetting of floors and walls, and interference to distribution by structural elements and tests to characterize response to sensitivity.”
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. is the independent laboratory most widely utilized in the United States for testing and listing of fire protection sprinklers and it was the first to list Special Sprinklers. The main UL sprinkler test standard for sprinklers conforming to NFPA 13 is UL 199, entitled “Standard for Automatic Sprinklers for Fire-Protection Service.”
Prior to the inventions described in Meyer et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,022, issued Nov. 22, 1994, and the inventions described in subsequent related patents, including: Meyer et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,579,846, issued Dec. 3, 1996; Meyer et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,584,344, issued Dec. 17, 1996; Meyer et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,609,211, issued Mar. 11, 1997; and Meyer et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,644,630, issued Sep. 9, 1997; UL had only listed extended coverage types of Special Sprinklers for use in Light Hazard applications. Commercial embodiments of the above patents to Meyer et al. were extended coverage sprinklers with nominal K-factors of 11.2 and 14.0 for use in Ordinary Hazard applications.
The listing of upright and pendent, extended coverage type Special Sprinklers for use in Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage applications was permitted under provisions of the 1973 through 1994 Editions of NFPA 13, although these editions of NFPA 13 did not include any installation guidance requirements specific to use of extended coverage type Special Sprinklers in Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage applications. In anticipation of future expansion of Listings in these categories, in the 1996 Edition of NFPA 13, the NFPA incorporated maximum protection area and maximum spacing criteria for extended coverage upright and pendent spray sprinklers, as a function of ceiling construction type. Although the 1996 Edition of NFPA 13 did not provide performance requirements specific to the concept of extended coverage upright and pendent spray sprinklers for Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage applications, it did specify maximum protection area of 196 square feet and maximum spacing of 14 feet for these applications. This was a reduction from the 400 square feet maximum protection area and 20 foot maximum spacing criteria previously applied to any type Special Sprinkler, due to concern that, in Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage applications, a larger protection area and spacing might overtax adjacent sprinklers, should one sprinkler not operate as anticipated.
In preparation for the NFPA Annual Meeting held on May 20-23, 1996, during which time the 1996 Edition of NFPA 13 was acted upon, the NFPA issued a “Report on Comments.” The “Report on Comments,” which members were asked to bring to the Annual Meeting, was a compilation of NFPA Technical Committee Reports or Comments provided for review by the NFPA membership prior to consideration at the meeting. The “Report on Comments” included description of action taken by the Committee on Automatic Sprinklers on a proposal by Mr. Peter Thomas of The Viking Corporation concerning the table on Sprinkler Discharge Characteristics Identification (Table 2-2.2 in 1996 Edition, changed to Table 3-2.3.1 in the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13). Mr. Thomas proposed that reference to a nominal 17 K-factor sprinkler should not be included in the Table, since it was not required for use with either standard or extended coverage sprinkler spacing, and that nominal 22 K-factor and 30 K-factor sprinklers would be preferred for extended coverage Extra Hazard and, possibly, for High-Piled Storage occupancies. However, the Thomas proposal did not consider, or reference, thermal sensitivity characteristics of the heat-responsive trigger of nominal 22 K-factor or 30 K-factor sprinklers, which would be essential to determining suitability of sprinklers for use as extended coverage upright and pendent spray sprinklers protecting Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage occupancies in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13.
Although guidelines for installation of extended coverage upright and pendent spray sprinklers in Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage occupancies were included in the 1996 Edition of NFPA 13, prior to the present invention, neither Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL) Standard UL199, entitled “Standard for Automatic Sprinklers for Fire-Protection Service,” nor Factory Mutual Research Corporation (FM) Standard Class Series 2000, entitled “Approval Standard for Automatic Sprinklers for Fire Protection,” contained any reference to listing and/or approval requirements for use of extended coverage upright and pendent spray sprinklers in Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage occupancies, even though both documents contained explicit listing and/or approval test requirements for use of extended coverage upright and pendent spray sprinklers in Light Hazard and Ordinary Hazard occupancies.
Furthermore, Meyer et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,022, and the subsequent related patents listed above, suggested that the heat-responsive trigger in extended coverage sprinklers for use in Light Hazard and Ordinary Hazard occupancies should provide the quickest possible response times, in order to activate the sprinkler as soon as possible after the beginning of a fire. Meyer et al. further suggested that the response time index (RTI) of the heat-responsive trigger should be less than 100 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) and preferably less than 50 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2). Also, the Meyer et al. patents teach that sprinklers with a K-factor greater than 8.7 are preferred for extended coverage sprinklers for use in Light Hazard and Ordinary Hazard occupancies, in order to minimize the water pressure required at the inlet end of the internal passageway through the body of the sprinkler, and thereby to reduce possible need for a booster pump in the sprinkler system water supply to establish adequate pressure for water fed into the inlet ends of the sprinklers.
According to one aspect of the invention, a low pressure (e.g., 7 psig minimum), extended coverage, fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 16.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis; a deflector mounted to the body by at least one support arm extending from the body and in alignment with the axis and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler; and a thermally-responsive closure assembly mounted in a manner to secure the outlet end of the internal passageway against flow of water in a non-fire condition and to release in response to a predetermined temperature condition indicative of a tire to permit flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the thermally-responsive closure assembly comprising a closure element and a heat-responsive trigger mounted to releasably secure the closure element at the outlet end of the internal passageway, the heat-responsive trigger having a response time index of at least about 15 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) and less than about 120 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2).
According to another aspect of the invention, a low pressure, extended coverage, upright-type fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 16.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis; a deflector mounted to the body by at least one support arm extending from the body and disposed in alignment with the axis and generally above and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler; and a thermally-responsive closure assembly mounted in a manner to secure the outlet end of the internal passageway against flow of water in a non-fire condition and to release in response to a predetermined temperature condition indicative of a fire to permit flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the thermally-responsive closure assembly comprising a closure element and a heat-responsive trigger mounted to releasably secure the closure element at the outlet end of the internal passageway, the heat-responsive trigger having a response time index (RTI) of at least about 15 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) and less than about 120 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2).
Preferred embodiments of these aspects of the invention may include one or more the following additional features. The response time index (RTI) is at least about 15 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) and less than about 50 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2), preferably the RTI is at least about 15 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) and less than about 35 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2), and more preferably the RTI is about 23 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2). The K-factor is between about 18 and about 41, preferably between about 21 and about 35, more preferably between about 23 and about 27, and still more preferably the K-factor is about 25.2. The heat-responsive trigger comprises a fusible solder element, preferably with a response time index (RTI) less than about 50 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2), and more preferably less than about 35 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2). Also, preferably, the heat-responsive trigger has a nominal release temperature of about 155° F. or above. The sprinkler is disposed in an array, with a first sprinkler spaced apart from an adjacent sprinkler in the array at a minimum distance of about 10 feet from the axis, in a first direction generally perpendicular to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, and in a second direction generally coplanar with the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, whereby the first sprinkler has a rectangular fire protection area of about 100 square feet. The sprinkler is disposed in an array, with a first sprinkler spaced apart from an adjacent sprinkler in the array at a distance of about 14 feet from the axis, in a first direction generally perpendicular to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, and in a second direction generally coplanar with the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, whereby the first sprinkler has a rectangular fire protection area of about 196 square feet. The pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway is in the range of about 7 pounds per square inch to about 175 pounds per square inch. The sprinkler, disposed in an array of sprinklers, is suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, with the water supply requirements for the sprinklers being determined in accordance with the area/density calculation methods of the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13. The sprinkler, disposed in an array of sprinklers, is suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high-piled storage occupancies, with the water supply requirements for the sprinklers being determined in accordance with the area/density calculation methods of the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13 for an area of sprinkler operation of about 2400 square feet or less, and preferably about 2000 square feet. The inner surface of the deflector defines a generally planar central area intersecting and generally perpendicular to the axis, a redirecting area comprising four slanted redirecting surfaces extending from a radially outer peripheral edge of the central area, each at a predetermined acute angle, relative to a horizontal plane through the central area, with a radially outer perimeter of the slanted redirecting surfaces being axially relatively closer to the outlet than the central area, and a plurality of spaced-apart tines extending from the radially outer perimeter of the slanted redirecting surfaces, towards the outlet, at predetermined tine angles, measured relative to the axis, with the intersections of adjacent slanted redirecting surfaces of the inner surface of the deflector defining channels, the channels extending radially outwardly and downwardly of the central area to enlarged, scalloped openings defined by adjacent of the spaced-apart tines at corner regions of the radially outer perimeter of the slanted redirecting surfaces with centers of the channels disposed at about 45° to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, thereby to direct a relatively lengthened flow of water toward the corner regions of the predetermined spray pattern disposed at about 45° to the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis.
According to still another aspect of the invention, an upright-type fire protection sprinkler comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 9.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis; and a deflector mounted to body by at least one support arm extending from the body and disposed in alignment with the axis and generally above and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler; the inner surface of the deflector defines a generally planar central area intersecting and generally perpendicular to the axis, a redirecting area comprising a plurality of three or more slanted redirecting surfaces extending from a radially outer peripheral edge of the central area, each at a predetermined acute angle, relative to a horizontal plane through the central area, with the radially outer perimeter of the slanted redirecting surfaces being axially relatively closer to the outlet than the central area, and a plurality of spaced-apart tines extending from the radially outer perimeter of the slanted redirecting surfaces, towards the outlet, at predetermined tine angles, measured relative to the axes.
Preferred embodiments of this aspect of the invention may include one or more the following additional features. The three or more slanted redirecting surfaces are substantially planar. Preferably, the redirecting area comprises four slanted redirecting surfaces, and, more preferably, each slanted redirecting surface is symmetrical about a vertical plane generally through its center, with an intersection of each vertical plane with the slanted redirecting surface defining the predetermined acute angle, measured relative to the horizontal plane through the central area. Preferably, the predetermined acute angle is between about 10° and about 40°, more preferably between about 15° and about 35°, and still more preferably between about 20° and about 30°.
According to one aspect of this preferred embodiment, the sprinkler is a low pressure, extended coverage, upright type fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, and the internal passageway has a K-factor greater than about 16.0, more preferably the K-factor is about 25.2, and still more preferably the predetermined acute angle is about 20°. The deflector comprises two or more spaced-apart tines extending from the radially outer perimeter of each slanted redirecting surface towards the outlet. Preferably, the deflector comprises three or more spaced-apart tines extending from the radially outer perimeter of the slanted redirecting surface towards the outlet. More preferably, the deflector comprises five spaced-apart tines extending from the radially outer perimeter of the slanted redirecting surface towards the outlet. The predetermined tine angle of the two or more spaced-apart tines is between about 0° and about 25° and preferably between about 5° and about 20°. The predetermined tine angle of the three or more spaced-apart tines is between about 0° and about 25° and preferably between about 5° and about 20°. The predetermined tine angle of the five spaced-apart tines is between about 0° and about 25° and preferably between about 5° and about 20°. The five spaced-apart tines extending from the radially outer perimeter of the slanted redirecting surface towards the outlet are characterized by different predetermined tine angles. For example, three adjacent spaced-apart tines extending from a middle region of the slanted redirecting surface towards the outlet are characterized by a predetermined tine angle between about 3° and about 11°, and two other spaced-apart tines extending from opposite outer regions of the slanted redirecting surface towards the outlet are characterized by a predetermined tine angle between about 9° and about 17°. Preferably, the three adjacent spaced-apart tines extending from the middle region of the slanted redirecting surface towards the outlet are characterized by a predetermined tine angle of about 7°, and the two other spaced-apart tines extending from the opposite outer regions of the slanted redirecting surface towards the outlet are characterized by a predetermined tine angle of about 13°. The vertical plane through center regions of a first opposing pair of slanted redirecting surfaces is substantially perpendicular to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis. Preferably, the vertical plane through center regions of a second opposing pair of the slanted redirecting surfaces is substantially coplanar to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis. More preferably, the deflector comprises two or more spaced-apart tines extending from the radially outer perimeter of each of the first opposing pair of slanted redirecting surfaces and three or more spaced-apart tines extending from the radially outer perimeter of each of the second opposing pair of slanted redirecting surfaces. Preferably, the spaced-apart tines extending from each of the first opposing pair of slanted redirecting surfaces are characterized by a predetermined tine angle of between about 5° and about 20°, and the spaced-apart tines extending from each of the second opposing pair of slanted redirecting surfaces are characterized by a predetermined tine angle of between about 5° and about 20°.
According to another aspect of the invention, a low pressure (e.g., 7 psig minimum), extended coverage, upright-type fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 16.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis; and a deflector mounted to the body by at least one support arm extending from the body and disposed in alignment with the axis and generally above and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler in a predetermined spray pattern of generally polygonal shape when viewed at a distance of about 3 feet below the deflector and at a pressure of about 12 psig at the inlet end of the internal passageway.
Preferred embodiments of this aspect of the invention may include one or more the following additional features. The polygonal shape spray pattern approximates a rectangular shape with the centerline through one set of opposing sides of the rectangular shape being substantially perpendicular to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis. Preferably, the rectangular shape has minimum dimensions of about 6 feet on a side.
According to still another aspect of the invention, a low pressure (e.g., 7 psig minimum), extended coverage, upright-type fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 16.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis, and a deflector mounted to the body by at least one support arm extending from the body and disposed in alignment with the axis and generally above and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler in a predetermined spray pattern such that water collects at a minimum rate of about 0.15 gallon per minute per square foot in a one foot by one foot area centered at about a 9 foot radius from the axis in any direction at about 45° to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis at a distance of about 4 feet below the deflector and at a pressure of about 16 psig at the inlet end of the internal passageway.
In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the minimum rate of water collected in the one foot by one foot area centered at the 9 foot radius from the axis in any direction at about 45° to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis at the distance of about 4 feet below the deflector and at the pressure of about 16 prig at the inlet end of the internal passageway is about 0.20 gallon per minute per square foot.
According to still another aspect of the invention, a low pressure, extended coverage, upright-type fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 16.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis; and a deflector mounted to the body by at least one support arm extending from the body and disposed in alignment with the axis and generally above and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler in a predetermined spray pattern such that more water is collected in a one foot by one foot area centered at about an 8 foot radius from the axis in any direction at about 45 to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, than in either the direction of the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, or in a direction perpendicular to the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, at a distance of about 3 feet below the deflector and at a pressure of about 16 psig at the inlet end of the internal passageway.
According to another aspect of the invention, a low pressure, extended coverage, upright-type fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 16.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis; and a deflector mounted to the body by at least one support arm extending from the body and disposed in alignment with the axis and generally above and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler in a predetermined spray pattern such that water collects at a minimum average rate of about 0.05 gallon per minute per square foot at a distance of about 10 feet below the deflector and at a pressure of about 16 psig at the inlet end of the passageway, in a 20 foot long array of one foot by one foot pans disposed parallel to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, the longitudinal centerline of the foot long array of pans being horizontally offset 10 feet from either side of the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, and the lateral centerline of the 20 foot long array of pans being located along an orthogonal plane perpendicular to the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, and intersecting the axis.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a low pressure, extended coverage, upright-type fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 16.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis; and a deflector mounted to the body by at least one support arm extending from the body and disposed in alignment with the axis and generally above and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler in a predetermined spray pattern such that water collects at a minimum average rate of about 0.07 gallon per minute per square foot at a distance of about 10 feet below the deflector and at a pressure of about 16 psig at the inlet end of the passageway, in a 20 foot long array of one foot by one foot pans disposed parallel to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, the longitudinal centerline of the foot long array of pans being horizontally offset 10 feet from either side of the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, and the lateral centerline of the 20 foot long array of pans being located along an orthogonal plane perpendicular to the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, and intersecting the axis.
According to still another aspect of the invention, a low pressure, extended coverage, upright-type fire protection sprinkler, suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, comprises a body defining an internal passageway extending between an inlet end and an opposite outlet end, the internal passageway having a K-factor of greater than about 16.0, where K-factor equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by square root of pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge, the outlet end having an axis; and deflector mounted to the body by at least one support arm extending from the body and disposed in alignment with the axis and generally above and spaced from the outlet end of the internal passageway, at a position with an inner surface of the deflector opposed to flow of water from the outlet end of the internal passageway, the inner surface of the deflector being configured and arranged to deflect flow of water generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler in a predetermined spray pattern such that water collects at a minimum average rate of about 0.09 gallon per minute per square foot at a distance of about 10 feet below the deflector and at a pressure of about 16 psig at the inlet end of the passageway, in a 20 foot long array of one foot by one foot pans disposed parallel to a plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, the longitudinal centerline of the foot long array of pans being horizontally offset 10 feet from either side of the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, and the lateral centerline of the 20 foot long array of pans being located along an orthogonal plane perpendicular to the plane generally of at least one support arm and the axis, and intersecting the axis.
A fire protection sprinkler can be characterized by its discharge coefficient or K-factor, which equals average flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway of the sprinkler divided by square root of the pressure of water fed into the inlet end of the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge. The discharge coefficient is governed to a large degree by the smallest cross sectional area of the internal passageway, in combination with the contour of the internal passageway. Discharge coefficients or K-factors are described as “nominal” values. Typically, “nominal” K-factors are expressed in standard sizes. Section 3-2.3 of the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13 “Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems,” provides guidelines for allowable “nominal” K-factors as well as the range of individual K-factor values permitted over the range of allowable water pressures at the inlet end of the internal passageway of the sprinkler, from minimum to maximum. For example, a sprinkler with a nominal K-factor of 16.8 encompasses a range of allowable values from 16.0 to 17.6, while a sprinkler with a nominal K-factor of 25.2 encompasses a range of allowable values from 23.9 to 26.5.
Sprinkler response to a fire condition (activation) is a function of a number of parameters. These include: temperature rating of the sprinkler; thermal sensitivity of the heat-responsive trigger portion of the sprinkler thermally-responsive closure assembly; initial ambient temperature conditions; ceiling height above the burning fuel; horizontal distance from the sprinkler(s) to the vertical fire axis; vertical distance from the ceiling to the sprinkler heat-responsive trigger; ceiling configuration and compartmentalization factors: and the rate of heat release from the fire, as described in the Seventh Edition of the “Automatic Sprinkler Systems Handbook.” edited by Milosh T. Puchovsky, P. E., the Response Time Index or “RTI” is a measure of thermal sensitivity as it relates to thermal inertia of the heat responsive trigger of an automatic sprinkler. RTI is substantially insensitive to the temperature rating of the sprinkler. The RTI value of a specific design for the heat-responsive trigger of an automatic sprinkler is determined experimentally by the use of a wind tunnel. The equation used for calculating RTI, and an apparatus and test procedure suitable for experimentally determining the parameters necessary to the calculation of RTI, are found, e.g., in the Factory Mutual Research Corporation “Approval Standard for Automatic Sprinklers for Fire Protection,” Class Series 2000, dated May 1998, the complete disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The 1999 Edition of NFPA 13 (referenced above) defines a sprinkler as being of the quick-response or fast-response type if its thermal sensitive element (i.e., heat-responsive trigger) has an RTI of 50 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) or less, and a sprinkler is defined as being of the standard-response type if its thermal sensitive element has an RTI of 80 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) or more.
The invention described herein, in an embodiment, termed a “25.2 K-factor Model EC-25” upright sprinkler, combines the attributes of a K-factor of greater than about 16 with a heat-responsive trigger having an RTI of at least about 15 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) and less than about 120 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) to provide an extended coverage-type Special Sprinkler suitable for use in protection of Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage occupancies with a maximum protection area of up to 196 square feet and installation in accordance with applicable installation criteria of the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13, with low pressures (e.g., 7 psig minimum) at the inlet end of the internal passageway through the body of the sprinkler.
UL and the Factory Mutual Research Corporation (FM), an FM Global Affiliate, initiated consideration of qualification test programs necessary to establish suitability of any type of extended coverage sprinkler for use in protection of Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage occupancies, with a maximum protection area per sprinkler of 196 square feet, only after they were specifically requested to establish Listing and/or Approval programs for the 25.2 K-factor Model EC-25 upright sprinkler. No Listing Agency, as defined by the 1999 Edition of NFPA 13 (e.g., UL and FM), has established a minimum RTI requirement for the heat-responsive trigger of any type of automatic sprinkler for fire protection service.
Fires involving the types of commodities present in Extra Hazard and High-Piled Storage occupancies have relatively high rates of heat release. Therefore, a sufficiently thermally sensitive, heat-responsive trigger (i.e., having an RTI less than a specified value) is required so that, prior to activation of sprinkler(s) in closest proximity to the fire, the fire is restricted from growing to such a size that it could overwhelm the flow of water discharged over the fire area. If a fire is not so restricted, the heat wave from the fire could activate sprinklers outside the immediate fire area, thus depleting the supply of water available to fight the fire and, potentially, allowing the fire to grow in size with more sprinklers activating still further away from the immediate, initial fire area. However, the heat-responsive trigger of extended coverage type of Special Sprinklers of this invention must also be sufficiently thermally insensitive (i.e., having an RTI of at least a specified value), in order to reduce the possibility that heat-responsive elements of sprinklers outside the immediate fire area will be prematurely heated to an activation temperature, thus also depleting the supply of water available to fight the fire, as described above.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Referring to
The frame 12 further typically includes a pair of support arms 32, 34 extending generally away from opposite sides of the outlet end 20 of the body 14 and meeting to form an apex 36. The apex is aligned with axis, A, and positioned generally above and spaced from the outlet end 20 of the internal passageway. A deflector 38, supported by the apex 36, has an inner deflector surface 40 opposed to flow of fire-fighting fluid, e.g., water, from the outlet end 20 of the internal passageway 16, the inner deflector surface 40 being configured and arranged to deflect flow of fire-fighting fluid generally radially outwardly and downwardly of the sprinkler 10.
At the outlet end 20 of the body 14, the frame 12 is enlarged into a hexagonally shaped, circumferential flange 42, with major, opposite parallel flat surfaces or “flats” 44, 46. The flats are positioned for engagement with an open-ended wrench or a specially designed sprinkler wrench having a hexagonally shaped recess for threading and tightening the sprinkler 10 into the threaded fitting, TF, for connection to the supply pipe, SP.
In a standby or non-fire condition, e.g., as shown in
Referring again to
Referring still to
The five spaced-apart tines 58 may also be characterized by relatively different predetermined tine angles. For example, referring to
Intersections of the slanted, planar redirecting surfaces 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D of the inner surface 40, of the deflector 38 define formations or channels 60 radially bounded by creases 61 (
Referring again to
The heat-responsive trigger 30, e.g., as described in Martin et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,893,679, the complete disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, consists of two, thin metallic links joined in face-to-face relationship by a thin layer of fusible solder. In the preferred embodiment, the links are formed of nickel alloy UNS NO2201 per ASTMB 152. Each link has a thickness, e.g., of about 0.0055 inch, and the fusible solder layer has a thickness, e.g., of about 0.001 inch. The trigger 30 has an overall width, e.g., of about 0.78 inch and an overall length, e.g., of about 0.88 inch. Martin et al. 679, in one embodiment, describes a heat-responsive trigger having a Response Time Index (RTI) between 40 ft1/2sec1/2 (f1/2s1/2) and 65 ft1/2sec1/2 (f1/2s1/2), i.e., between i.e., 22 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) and 36 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2), as measured in accordance with the Factory Mutual Research Corp. (FM) Approval Standard (dated Jun. 18, 1996) in force at that time for establishing the approval requirements for Early Suppression-Fast Response Automatic Sprinklers. The FM requirements for Response Time Index (RTI) of Early Suppression-Fast Response Automatic Sprinklers have since been revised to specify limits of 35 ft1/2sec1/2 (f1/2s1/2) to 65 ft1/2sec1/2 (f1/2s1/2), i.e., 19 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) to 36 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2), as recited in Section 4.24.1 of Class Number 2008 Standard, dated August 1996. This FM standard does not recite any RTI requirements for low pressure (e.g., 7 psig minimum), extended coverage, fire protection sprinkler suitable for use in protection of at least extra hazard and high-piled storage occupancies, in accordance with the 199 Edition of NFPA 13.
In full scale fire testing conducted by FM for Grinnell Corporation Model EC-25 uprights sprinklers (25.2 K-factor. 165° F. nominal fuse temperature rating, with an RTI of at least about 15 meter1/2 sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2) and less than about 35 meter1/2sec1/2 (m1/2s1/2)) embodying the invention, only a relatively few sprinklers, all in the immediate vicinity of the test fire, were activated. A few examples from this fire testing are provided below.
For full-scale fire testing, four tiers of Class 2 commodity were stacked in a double row rack arrangement to a height of 19 feet, 8 inches beneath a ceiling 30 feet high. Grinnell Corporation Model EC-25 sprinklers, as described above, were installed in an array on centers of 14 feet by 14 feet, with constant operating pressure of 8.5 psig (e.g., nominal discharge per sprinkler of 73.5 gallons per minute) at inlet ends of the sprinklers. A fire was ignited adjacent to the floor and in a position centered below four of the Model EC-25 sprinklers. The fire was rapidly subdued by operation of only four sprinklers in the immediate vicinity of the fire area.
For full-scale fire testing, three tiers of Cartoned Group A unexpanded plastic commodity were stacked in a double-row rack arrangement to a height of 14 feet, 8 inches beneath a ceiling 25 feet high. Grinnell Corporation Model EC-25 sprinklers, as described above, were installed in an array on centers of 10 feet by 10 feet, with constant operating pressure of 7 psig (e.g., nominal discharge per sprinkler of 67 gallons per minute) at inlet ends of the sprinklers. A fire was ignited adjacent to the floor and in a position centered below one of the Model EC-25 sprinklers. The fire was rapidly subdued by operation of only the one sprinkler directly over the fire area.
For full-scale fire testing, three tiers of Cartoned Group A unexpanded plastic commodity were stacked in a palletized arrangement to a height of 15 feet, 3 inches beneath a ceiling 25 feet high. Grinnell Corporation Model EC-25 sprinklers, as described above, were installed in an array on centers of 14 feet by 14 feet, with constant operating pressure of 22 psig (e.g., nominal discharge per sprinkler of 118 gallons per minute) at inlet ends of the sprinklers. A fire was ignited adjacent to the floor and in a position centered below four of the Model EC-25 sprinklers. The fire was rapidly subdued by operation of only two sprinklers in the immediate vicinity of the fire area.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, although in the presently preferred embodiment, as described above, the deflector is mounted to the body by a pair of support arms, other numbers of support arms are contemplated, e.g. one support arm, or three or more support arms. Where other than two support arms, arrayed at 180° are employed, a plane of the support arms means a plane generally through at least one support arm and through the axis, A. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a Continuation Application of U.S. Ser. No. 11/240,383 filed on Oct. 3, 2005, which is a Continuation Application of prior application U.S. Ser. No. 10/762,275 filed Jan. 23, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,976,543 issued Dec. 20, 2005), which is a Divisional Application of prior application U.S. Ser. No. 09/718,785 (now abandoned) filed on Nov. 22, 2000, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 269930 | Harris | Jan 1883 | A |
| 306662 | Stratton | Oct 1884 | A |
| 316581 | Stratton | Apr 1885 | A |
| 433477 | Lapham | Aug 1890 | A |
| 514162 | Newton | Feb 1894 | A |
| 546087 | Carpenter | Sep 1895 | A |
| 575121 | Lapham | Jan 1897 | A |
| 640757 | Gates et al. | Jan 1900 | A |
| 720013 | Etsy | Feb 1903 | A |
| 824128 | Martin | Jun 1906 | A |
| 1165313 | Bower | Dec 1915 | A |
| 1285133 | Gross | Nov 1918 | A |
| 1338469 | Waage et al. | Apr 1920 | A |
| 1816016 | Knight | Jul 1931 | A |
| 1903150 | Tyden | Mar 1933 | A |
| 2025063 | Loepsinger | Dec 1935 | A |
| 2135138 | Kendall | Nov 1938 | A |
| 2155990 | Hodgman, Jr. | Apr 1939 | A |
| 2180258 | Rowley | Nov 1939 | A |
| 2211399 | Winslow | Aug 1940 | A |
| 2291813 | Knight | Aug 1942 | A |
| 2291818 | Loepsinger | Aug 1942 | A |
| 2357227 | Rowley | Aug 1944 | A |
| 2558450 | Martin | Jun 1951 | A |
| 2591872 | Rider | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2697008 | Rowley | Oct 1953 | A |
| 2724614 | Rider | Nov 1955 | A |
| 2732018 | Grimes | Jan 1956 | A |
| 2768696 | Sherburne | Oct 1956 | A |
| 2862565 | Dukes | Dec 1958 | A |
| 2871953 | Bray | Feb 1959 | A |
| 3007528 | Gloeckler | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3061015 | Cann, Jr. | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3067823 | Kavanagh | Dec 1962 | A |
| 3080000 | Gloeckler | Mar 1963 | A |
| 3135331 | Lee | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3195647 | Campbell et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
| 3401751 | Loftin et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
| 3414112 | Ravn | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3525402 | Hattori | Aug 1970 | A |
| 3561537 | Dix et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3584689 | Willms | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3625289 | Gloeckler | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3653444 | Livingston | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3675894 | Friedell | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3682251 | Livingston | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3716103 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3722596 | Livingston | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3743022 | Livingston | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3768736 | Cox | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3783947 | Dix et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3802512 | Todtenkopf | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3812915 | Livingston | May 1974 | A |
| 3818994 | Livingston | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3834463 | Allard et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3888313 | Freeman | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3896880 | Asp | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3904126 | Allard | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3924687 | Groos | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3927805 | Stull | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3970218 | Lee | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4007878 | Anderson | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4014388 | Anderson | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4015665 | Simons et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4066129 | Anderson | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4079786 | Moling | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4091872 | Mountford | May 1978 | A |
| 4091873 | Werner | May 1978 | A |
| 4099675 | Wohler et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4105076 | Simons et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4113021 | Werner | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4121665 | Woycheese | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4136740 | Groos | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4139062 | Rago | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4150811 | Condit | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4177862 | Bray | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4220208 | Jackson et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4228858 | Sclafani | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4237982 | Sclafani | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4258795 | Hansen | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4273195 | Fischer et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4279309 | Fischer et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4280562 | Glinecke | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4296815 | Mears | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4296816 | Fischer | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4403626 | Paul, Jr. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4405018 | Fischer | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4417626 | Hansen | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4580729 | Pounder | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4585069 | Whitaker | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4625915 | Cockman | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4630682 | Pieczkolan | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4657085 | Jacobsen | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4732216 | Polan | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4800961 | Klein | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4880063 | Leininger et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4893679 | Martin | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4901799 | Pepi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4930578 | Barnett et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4976320 | Polan | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4981179 | Klein | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5020601 | Retzloff et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5022468 | Byrne | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5036923 | Shea, Sr. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5094298 | Polan | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5143657 | Curtis | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5152344 | Fischer et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5188185 | Mears | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5190222 | Haruch | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195592 | Simons | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5228520 | Gottschalk | Jul 1993 | A |
| D348719 | Dolan | Jul 1994 | S |
| 5333794 | Haruch | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5366022 | Meyer | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5373989 | Hattori | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5392993 | Fischer | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5415239 | Kotter et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5523682 | Leon | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5553576 | Mears | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5570713 | Stoltz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579846 | Meyer | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584344 | Meyer | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5609211 | Meyer | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5628367 | Truax et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5664630 | Meyer | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5669449 | Polan et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5687914 | Bosio et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5722599 | Fries | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5753149 | Shepherd et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5775431 | Ondracek | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5810263 | Tramm | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5829532 | Meyer | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5829684 | Fishcer | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839667 | Fishcer | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5862994 | Pounder | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865256 | Pounder | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5890657 | Ponte | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5915479 | Ponte | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5957392 | Pincus | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5967240 | Ondracek | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6000473 | Reilly | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6029749 | Reilly et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6059044 | Fischer | May 2000 | A |
| 6098718 | Sato | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6152236 | Retzloff et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6155494 | Fabbri et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6158520 | Reilly et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6216793 | Sundholm | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6246333 | Doner et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6276460 | Pahila | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6367559 | Winebrenner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6446732 | Polan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6450265 | Ponte | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454017 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6502643 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6554077 | Polan | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6851482 | Dolan | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6868917 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6976543 | Fischer | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 7036603 | Thomas et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7143834 | Dolan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7165624 | Fischer | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7275603 | Polan | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7559376 | Silva, Jr. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7584802 | Fischer | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7624812 | Pahila | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7730959 | Fischer | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7819201 | Pounder et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 20020050531 | Dolan | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20030075343 | Ballard | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20050121206 | Dolan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050173562 | Franson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060060361 | Pounder et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060102362 | Polan | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060113093 | Silva | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20070114047 | Fischer | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070187116 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070246232 | Pahila | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080257564 | Cordell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090126950 | Rogers | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090211772 | Silva, Jr. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090294138 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100032173 | Fischer | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100071916 | Fischer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 199865360 | Sep 1998 | AU |
| 2462636 | Aug 2005 | CA |
| 2358744 | Sep 2009 | CA |
| 2508355 | Sep 1976 | DE |
| 2700431 | Jul 1978 | DE |
| 3910287 | Oct 1990 | DE |
| 4103862 | Aug 1992 | DE |
| 4136912 | May 1993 | DE |
| 4480591 | Mar 1996 | DE |
| 4480591 | Nov 2000 | DE |
| 0 695 562 | Feb 1996 | EP |
| 765125 | Jan 1957 | GB |
| 1307095 | Feb 1973 | GB |
| 1556217 | Nov 1979 | GB |
| 1570080 | Jun 1980 | GB |
| 8708851.7 | Sep 1987 | GB |
| 2195241 | Apr 1988 | GB |
| 2206043 | Dec 1988 | GB |
| 2293337 | Mar 1996 | GB |
| 2293337 | Aug 1997 | GB |
| 2336777 | Nov 1999 | GB |
| 49-98198 | Aug 1974 | JP |
| 50-16793 | Feb 1975 | JP |
| 54-143100 | Oct 1979 | JP |
| 3-27259 | Mar 1991 | JP |
| 4-150873 | May 1992 | JP |
| 04-329969 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| 11-104262 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| WO 8200603 | Mar 1982 | WO |
| WO 9519851 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| WO9818525 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9828042 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| WO 2006058330 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09718785 | Nov 2000 | US |
| Child | 10762275 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11240383 | Oct 2005 | US |
| Child | 12368973 | US | |
| Parent | 10762275 | Jan 2004 | US |
| Child | 11240383 | US |
