Low pressure fast response bulb sprinklers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6336509
  • Patent Number
    6,336,509
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 16, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 8, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A low pressure fast response sprinkler includes a generally tubular body having an inlet end, an opposing discharge end and an internal passageway extending between the inlet and discharge ends with a K factor greater than 16 where the K factor equals the flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by the square root of the pressure of water fed into the tubular body in pounds per square inch gauge. A deflector is coupled with the tubular body and spaced from and generally aligned with the discharge end of the internal passageway so as to be impacted by a flow of water issuing in a column from the discharge end upon activation of the sprinkler. The deflector is configured and positioned to deflect the flow of water generally radially outwardly all around the sprinkler. A closure is releasably positioned at the discharge end of the tubular body so as to close the internal passageway by a heat responsive trigger which includes a frangible, fluid containing glass bulb trigger mounted to releasably retain the closure at the discharge end of the tubular body. The trigger has a response time indices (RTI) of less than 100 meter½sec ½. A specific early suppression fast response pendent sprinkler with a nominal K factor of 25, an RTI of less than 40 m½sec½ and delivering at least 100 gallons per minute at an operating pressure at or below 20 psig is described.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Early suppression fast response (“ESFR”) sprinklers are a well known and well defined class of ceiling fire sprinklers. ESFR sprinklers were developed in the 1980's by Factory Mutual Research Corporation (“FM”) with the assistance of certain sprinkler manufacturers in an effort to provide improved fire protection against certain high-challenge fire hazards. According to FM, ESFR sprinklers combine fast response with greater supplied and actually delivered water densities for greater fire suppression capability. Previous sprinklers (standard sprinklers) provided protection by merely keeping such fires under control. Ultimately the initial fuel source would deplete itself or other fire fighting equipment would have to be brought to the scene to extinguish the fire.




The performance requirements of ESFR sprinklers are set forth in Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (“UL”) STANDARD FOR EARLY-SUPPRESSION FAST-RESPONSE SPRINKLERS UL 1767. This standard was first published in 1990. Factory Mutual Research Corporation (“Factory Mutual” or “FM”) also has an Approval Standard For Early Suppression—Fast Response (ESFR) Automatic Sprinklers, Class Number 2008. The current ESFR standards and all earlier ESFR standards of either organization are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.




Requirements for the installation and use of ESFR sprinklers are included in various standards of the National Fire Protection Association including the Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, NFPA 13; the Standard for General Storage, NFPA 231; and the Standard for Rack Storage of Materials, NFPA 231c. The current and earlier editions of these standards to the extent that they pertain to ESFR sprinklers are incorporated by reference herein. Installation and use requirements for ESFR sprinklers are also given Loss Prevention Data sheets 2-2, “EARLY SUPPRESSION FAST RESPONSE SPRINKLERS”,


Factory Mutual System,


Factory Mutual Engineering Corp., 1987, which is also incorporated by reference herein. Loss Prevention Data sheets 2-8 N, “Installation of Sprinkler Systems”,


Factory Mutual System,


Factory Mutual Engineering Corp., 1989, presents other installation and use requirements for ESFR and other sprinklers generally which are not presented in Loss Prevention Data sheets 2-2 and is also incorporated herein.




The standards specify the construction, performance, installation and operation of ESFR sprinklers with significant particularity. For example, the discharge coefficient (or “K” factor) of an ESFR sprinkler is nominally 14 and must be within the range of 13.5-14.5, where the discharge coefficient is calculated by dividing the flow of water in gallons per minute through the sprinkler by the square root of the pressure of water supplied to the sprinkler in pounds per square inch gauge. Ordinary or standard sprinklers are considered to have response time indices (“RTI”) of 100 meter


½


second


½


(“m


½


sec


½


”) or more although the response time indices actually reported for these sprinklers have all exceeded 100 m


½


sec


½


. One special class of faster operating sprinklers exists with response time indices between 50 and 80 m


½


sec


½


. Existing ESFR sprinklers must exhibit response time indices of less than 40 m


½


sec


½


. The installation and use standards further require, among other things, that a minimum operating pressure of 50 psi be provided to ESFR sprinklers.




ESFR sprinklers were originally designed to suppress fires in warehouses with thirty-foot ceilings where flammable stock such as certain plastics is piled up to twenty-five feet high in racks. In many instances, available water supplies are not capable of providing a minimum operating pressure of 50 psi to thirty-foot high sprinklers. In such cases, a supplemental pump is needed to boost water pressure before ESFR sprinklers can be used. The cost of providing an auxiliary pump can be significant. For example, in protecting a 40,000 square foot building with ESFR sprinklers, it is estimated that the cost of providing an auxiliary pump can represent about twenty-five (25) percent of the entire cost of the installed sprinkler system. In certain installations, a second, back-up pump may be needed. If comparable protection might be provided at pressures below the current 50 psig minimum required pressured for ESFR sprinklers, the need for a pump might be avoided. In instances where a pump would be required in any event, lower pressure requirements may permit the use of a lower capacity, less expensive pump or the use of the same pump with smaller diameter, higher friction but less expensive supply lines. Each of these three possible options could provide significant savings in installation costs of ESFR sprinklers.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one aspect the invention is a low pressure fast response bulb sprinkler comprising a generally tubular body having an inlet end, an opposing discharge end and an internal passageway extending between the inlet and discharge ends with a K factor greater than 16 where the K factor equals the flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by the square root of the pressure of water fed into the internal passageway in pounds per square inch gauge; a deflector coupled with the tubular body and spaced from and generally aligned with the discharge end of the internal passageway so as to be impacted by a flow of water issuing from the discharge end of the passageway upon activation of the sprinkler, the deflector being configured and positioned to deflect the flow of water generally radially outwardly all around the sprinkler; a closure releasably positioned at the discharge end of the tubular body so as to close the internal passageway; and a heat responsive trigger at least including a frangible liquid containing glass bulb mounted to releasably retain the closure at the discharge end of the tubular body, the glass bulb having a response time index of less than 100 meter


½


sec


½


(m


½


sec


½


).











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown. In the drawings which are diagrammatic:





FIG. 1

is an elevation view of an low pressure, early suppression fast response ceiling sprinkler of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a partial cross-sectional view of the sprinkler taken generally along the lines of


2





2


in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a greatly enlarged view of the encircled area


3


of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

is a sectional elevation of the trigger;





FIG. 5

is a bottom view of the sprinkler of

FIG. 1

;





FIGS. 6 and 7

are orthogonal elevation views of a first low pressure, early suppression fast response glass bulb ceiling sprinkler of the present invention;





FIG. 8

is a partially sectioned view of the sprinkler of

FIGS. 6 and 7

taken along the lines


8





8


in

FIG. 7

showing details of the mounting supporting the glass bulb and retaining the closure;





FIG. 9

is a detailed section of the pedestal in

FIG. 8

;





FIGS. 10 and 11

are orthogonal elevation views of a second low pressure, early suppression fast response glass bulb ceiling sprinkler of the present invention; and





FIG. 12

is a perspective view of the sprinkler of

FIGS. 10 and 11

showing details of the mounting supporting the glass bulb and retaining the closure; and





FIG. 13

depicts diagrammatically yet another bulb equipped trigger.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like elements throughout. There is shown in various views in

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


5


, a low pressure, early suppression fast response fire sprinkler of the present invention indicated generally at


10


. Sprinkler


10


includes a preferably one-piece frame


11


having an at least generally tubular body indicated generally at


12


with a preferably tapered, central, internal passageway


14


. The passageway


14


preferably extends straight between an inlet end


15


and a discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


. Threads


17


are provided on the outside of the inlet end


15


to permit the sprinkler


10


to be coupled to a drop or supply pipe (neither depicted) for delivery of water or another fire fighting fluid. The internal passageway


14


of body


12


has a preferably straight central axis A indicated in

FIGS. 1 and 2

.




Sprinkler


10


further includes a closure


20


releasably positioned at the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


so as to close the internal passageway


14


, a heat responsive trigger indicated generally at


30


mounted to releasably retain the closure


20


at the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


closing the passageway


14


until the trigger


30


is activated, and a deflector indicated generally at


60


.




Referring to

FIG. 1

, the frame


11


further includes a pair of support arms


50


,


52


which extend generally away from opposite sides of the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


and meet to form a tubular knuckle


54


located along central axis A. The arms


50


,


52


and knuckle


54


support the deflector


60


positioned juxtaposed to, facing and spaced away from the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


. While at least two symmetrically positioned support arms


50


,


52


are preferred, three or four support arms might be provided, preferably all symmetrically positioned around and spaced away from the central axis A. Where more than two support arms are provided, they may be separately attached to a tubular body, for example, by being threaded into a flange portion of such separate tubular body.




The frame


11


is preferably enlarged at the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


into a circumferential flange


18


. The flange


18


is preferably hexagonally shaped with a pair of major opposing parallel flat surfaces or “flats”


18




a


positioned to receive an open ended wrench or a specially designed hexagonal sprinkler wrench for threading the sprinkler


10


into a drop or other fluid supply line (neither depicted).




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the internal passageway


14


includes an inwardly tapering portion


14




a


extending from the inlet end


16


to a cylindrical portion


14




b


of uniform, reduced diameter. A portion


14




c


of the passageway immediately downstream from the reduced diameter portion


14




b


is provided with a greater diameter to receive the closure


20


over the reduced diameter portion


14




b


. Portion


14




c


may be outwardly beveled at approximately a 10°-15° angle for its length to foster release of the closure


20


(see FIG.


3


). The passageway


14


then abruptly and significantly enlarges in diameter into a cylindrical outlet opening


14




d


at the discharge end


16


of the frame body


12


. A lip


19


is formed around the outlet opening


14




d


by the provision of a circular groove


14




e


between the lip


19


and the beveled end of portion


14




c


of the passageway.




The tubular body


12


may have an axial length of about one and one-third inches with the flange


18


having a length of about one-third inch. The inwardly tapering portion


14




a


may have a length of about seven-eighths of an inch and taper down at about a one and one-half degree angle to central axis A from a width of 0.98 to a width of 0.93 inches, which is continued for about one-eighth of an inch in reduced diameter portion


14




b


. Portion


14




c


may have a minimum diameter of about one inch and a length of about one-sixteenth inch. In the preferred embodiment, the outlet opening


14




d


may have a diameter of about one and one-third inches and an axial length of about one-third inch while the groove


14




e


has a diameter of about one and one-half inches and an axial length of only about one-eighth inch.




The preferred sprinkler


10


has a nominal discharge coefficient or K factor of 25. The discharge coefficient or K factor equals the flow of water through the internal passageway


14


in gallons per minute divided by the square root of the pressure of water fed into the tubular body in pounds per square inch gauge. The discharge coefficient is governed in a large degree by the smallest cross sectional area of the passageway


14


, in other words, the diameter of the cylindrical portion


14




b


of passageway


14


.




The discharge coefficient or “K” factor of a sprinkler is determined by standard flow testing. For ESFR sprinklers, passageway


14


is measured first at a pressure of 15 psig, and then in 5 psig increments up to 50 psig and then in 10 psig increments up to 100 psig, and then in 25 psig increments at 125, 150 and 175 psig. The flow is decreased in the same increments back to the original 15 psig value. The flow is measured at each increment of pressure by a flow-measuring device having an accuracy within about 2 percent of the actual flow. The actual flow in gallons per minute is divided by the square root of the pressure of the supplied water in psig at each increment. An average value is then calculated from all of the incremental values and becomes the flow coefficient or “K” factor of the sprinkler.




Discharge coefficients of K factors can be “nominal” values. Typically “nominal” K factors are expressed in standard sizes, which are integer or half integer values. These standard or “nominal” values encompass the stated integer or half integer value plus or minus one-half integer. Thus, a nominal K factor of 25 encompasses all measured K factors between 24.5 and 25.5.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the closure


20


preferably is also a subassembly and has an upstream end


20




a


, which is received over the reduced diameter portion


14




b


of the passageway


14


in the beveled portion


14




c


of the passageway. A downstream end


20




b


of the closure


20


engages a proximal end of the trigger


30


. Referring to

FIG. 3

, the closure


20


is formed by a saddle


22


and a washer subassembly that includes a Belleville washer


26


bearing a sheet of plastic film tape


28


, preferably a tetrafluoroethylene tape on one side, which is the side of the closure


20


facing the uniform reduced diameter portion


14




b


of the passageway


14


. Saddle


22


is a generally rotationally symmetric body including a cylindrical plug portion


22




a


, which is received within a center opening of the Belleville washer


26


to stabilize the washer with respect to the saddle


22


. The saddle has a circular flange portion


22




b


with an outer diameter approximately equal to the outer diameter of the Belleville washer


26


and slightly greater than the diameter of reduced diameter portion


14




b


. Saddle


22


further includes a central circular boss


22




c


projecting away from the plug portion


22




a


with a threaded central bore


22




d.






The preferred trigger


30


is an assembly which preferably includes a pair of identical, generally L-shaped levers


32


. Each lever


32


includes a short arm portion


32




a


, which is positioned between lip


19


and the downstream end


20




b


of the closure


20


, releasably retaining the closure


20


in the internal passageway


14


closing the passageway. Long arm portions


32




b


of the levers


32


extend away from discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


and passageway


14


and are held together by a lever yoke


34


. Yoke


34


preferably is a one-piece, generally octagonally-shaped body with a central circular opening. Diametrically opposed portions


34




b


and


34




c


of the body are bent around the proximal long ends


32




b


of the levers


32


, thereby holding those ends together and releasably retaining the closure


20


in the passageway


14


so as to close the passageway


14


. Cutouts can be provided on the outer edges of the flange portion


22




b


of the saddle to receive and stabilize the position of the short arm portions


32




a


of the levers


32


.




Referring to

FIGS. 2 and 4

, trigger


30


further includes a retainer body


36


, a plunger housing


38


having one end received in the retainer body


36


and a retaining nut received in a remaining end of the plunger housing


38


and forming a plunger chamber


39


receiving a plunger


40


. Those and other elements of trigger


30


are best seen in

FIG. 4. A

retaining nut


43


supports a finned heat collector


44


from a side of the plunger housing


38


opposite the retainer body


36


. The finned heat collector


44


is preferably coupled with and thermally insulated from the retaining nut


43


by a thermally insulative support washer


45


of a suitable material such as glass reinforced nylon. The finned heat collector


44


is hollow and contains a pellet


46


of a metal alloy having a melting temperature at the desired operating or response temperature of the sprinkler


10


. Plunger


40


is formed by a pin and a generally bulbous main body


40




a


along the pin, which divides the pin into upper and lower ends


40




b


and


40




c


. The lower pin end


40




c


of plunger


40


is supported on the metal alloy pellet


46


by a cylindrical bearing disk


47


made of a material such as alumina having significant compressive strength and thermal insulative properties. The upper pin end


40




b


guides and centers the plunger


40


in the chamber


39


. The purpose of the pellet


46


, bearing disk


47


and plunger


40


is to support a plurality of balls


48


which extend through bores


38




a


in the side walls of the plunger housing


38


and into aligned recesses


36




a


in the retainer body


36


thereby releasably locking the retainer body


36


and plunger housing


38


together. The “free” or “upper end”


36




b


of the retainer body


36


ears external threads


37


(diagrammatically by phantom), which are received in the threaded central bore


22




d


of the saddle


22


of the closure


20


. Levers


32


, which are held together by lever yoke


34


, releasably retain closure


20


in the tubular body


12


. The retainer body


36


is held through saddle


22


and the remainder of the trigger


30


is coupled with the saddle through the retainer body


36


by means of the balls


48


. The balls


48


, in turn, are held by the bulbous main body


40




a


of the plunger


40


, which is forced against the balls


48


by tightening of the retaining nut


43


into the plunger housing


38


. The alloy pellet


46


will lose its load bearing strength when heated sufficiently allowing the balls to move and permitting the plunger housing


38


and lever yoke


34


to separate from the retainer body


36


and levers


32


, respectively, releasing closure


20


with trigger


30


permitting water (or other fire fighting fluid) to pass through the internal passageway


14


and from the discharge end


16


of the passageway


14


and body


12


.




The structure and mounting of the deflector


60


are best seen in

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


5


. Deflector


60


includes a plate


62


, and a nose piece positioned in an opening in the center of the plate


42


.




The plate


62


of the deflector is planar and circular with a circular outer perimeter


63


and a plurality of slots


64


extending radially inwardly from the circular perimeter


63


and axially entirely through the plate


62


. The plurality of slots


64


surround and define a “slotless” central area


65


as best seen in FIG.


2


. As used herein “slotless central area” refers to a circular central area at the center of the deflector, which has a radius equal to the radius of the plate member less the radial length of the longest slot extending radially from the outer perimeter of the plate member in a planar projection of the deflector perpendicular to central axis A. Thus, if the nose piece of the deflector overlaps the innermost ends of some or all of the slots, the slotless central area is the planar area of the nose piece which covers the ends of such slots. In the preferred embodiment, the outer diameter of the central area


65


is substantially equivalent to the outer diameter of the frame knuckle


54


.




The nose piece


66


has a head portion


66




a


facing the tubular body


14


which is suggestedly rounded in shape and preferably hemispheric. The head portion


66




a


supports a shaft portion


66




b


bearing external threads


67


(indicated diagrammatically by phantom lines) which permit the nose piece


66


to be screwed into the internally threaded knuckle


54


. A slot


66




c


may be provided at the base of the shaft portion


66




b


to receive a screw driver. The nose piece passes through a circular opening


62




a


provided in the center of the deflector plate


62


(within the central area


65


) and holds the plate


62


firmly to the knuckle


54


. The deflector


60


is coupled with the tubular body


14


through knuckle


54


and is positioned juxtaposed to and spaced from the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


aligned with the discharge end


16


of the internal passageway central axis A of the tubular body. Nose piece


66


is further preferably provided with a central bore


66




d


also aligned with the central axis A of the internal passageway


14


and discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


. The deflector


60


is configured by being generally rotationally symmetric and positioned by being centered on central axis A to deflect the flow of water issuing from the discharge end of internal passageway


14


generally symmetrically radially outwardly all around the sprinkler


10


. Bore


66




d


permits water to pass axially entirely through the center of the deflector


60


and down directly under the sprinkler


10


. This bore


66




d


combined with the much larger orifice size of internal passageway


14


in comparison to the diameter of the slotless central area of the deflector has proven sufficient to deliver adequate water densities directly beneath the sprinkler


10


to suppress high challenge fires originating directly under sprinkler


10


as well as to such fires originating between such sprinklers


10


.




Sprinklers


10


of the present invention are installed in accordance with standard ESFR limitations including spacing and height limitations.




For the preferred 25 K factor tubular body having a minimum diameter of 0.930 inches in the reduced diameter cylindrical portion


14




b


of the internal passageway


14


, the head portion


66




a


of the nose piece


66


is provided with a radius of about one-quarter inch and with a bore


66




d


having a diameter of about one-eighth inch. The deflector plate


62


is preferably 1.9 inches in outer diameter and about one-tenth of an inch thick. Plate


62


is provided with twelve slots


64


uniformly angularly arrayed in 30° increments around central axis A. Each slot


64


is about one-tenth inch in width and terminates in a radius (semicircle). The diameter of the central area surrounded by and located within the slots


64


is suggestedly about five-eighths inch.




The surface of the knuckle


54


closest to the tubular body


14


is spaced about two and one-half inches from the proximal end of the reduced diameter cylindrical portion


14




b


of the internal passageway


14


. The ratio of the outer diameter of the deflector


60


, more particularly the deflector plate


62


, to the radial length of the slots


64


is about 3 (1.9/0.635). The plurality of slots


64


provide a total open area of less than one-third but more than one-quarter the total planar area within the circular perimeter


63


of the deflector. All of these values are within the ranges exhibited by existing ESFR sprinklers. However, the ratio of the minimum passageway diameter of the tubular body to the diameter of the central area of the deflector is about 1.5 (0.93 in/0.624 in). The highest ratio previously exhibited in an ESFR sprinkler was less than 1.3.




One of the requirements for an ESFR sprinkler is fast response. Response can be measured in various ways. Factory Mutual and Underwriters Laboratories, use a combination of temperature ratings and response time indices to insure adequately fast response is being provided.




The response time indices or “RTI” is a measure of thermal sensitivity and is related to the thermal inertia of a heat responsive element of a sprinkler. RTI is insensitive to temperature. For fast-growing industrial fires of the type to be protected by ESFR sprinklers, it is believed that the RTI and temperature rating of the trigger are sufficient to insure adequately fast sprinkler response. The temperature rating is the range of operating temperatures at which the heat responsive element of a sprinkler will activate.




RTI is equal to τu


½


where τ is the thermal time constant of the trigger in units of seconds and u is the velocity of the gas across the trigger. RTI is determined experimentally in a wind tunnel by the following equation:






RTI
=


-

t
x




u

1
2




/



ln




[

1
-

(

Δ







T
b

/
Δ







T
g


)


]












where t


x


is the actual measured response or actuation time of the sprinkler; u is the gas velocity in the test section with the sprinkler; ΔT


b


is the difference between the actuation temperature of the trigger (determined by a separate heat soak test) and the ambient temperature outside the tunnel (i.e. the initial temperature of the sprinkler); and ΔT


b


is the difference between the gas temperature within the tunnel where the sprinkler is located and the ambient temperature outside the tunnel. The RTI for ESFR sprinkler is determined with air heated to 197 (±2)° C. and passed at a constant velocity of 2.56 (±0.03) m/sec over the sprinkler


10


and trigger


30


inserted into the air stream in the pendent position (see

FIG. 1

) with a plane through frame arms


50


,


52


being perpendicular to the direction of the heated air. The aforesaid FM and UL Standards should be consulted for further information if desired.




When fast response was being investigated in the 1980's, the RTI's so-called standard sprinklers were measured and were found to be more than 100 m


½


sec


½


typically up to nearly 400 m


½


sec


½


. RTI's of less than 100 m


½


sec


½


were considered quicker than standard sprinkler responses and referred to as quick response. More recently, quick response has come to denote RTI's of less than 80 m


½


sec


½


. Sprinklers incorporating such quick response triggers were referred to as fast response. A class of “special” sprinklers has been recognized having RTI's between 80 and 50 m


½


sec


½


. RTI values currently acceptable for ESFR sprinklers are less than 40 m


½


sec


½


, more particularly 19 to 36 m


½


sec


½


.




The 25 K factor sprinkler


10


will supply 100 gallons per minute at a flow pressure of less than 16 psig while one with a K factor of 26 will supply 100 gallons per minute at just under 15 psi. Applicants believe that 15 psi is the minimum pressure needed to drive drops of the size generated by the sprinkler


10


into the heated plume created by a high challenged fire. The nominal 25 K sprinkler of the present invention therefore is believed to be optimally-sized for its use. However, ESFR sprinklers providing 100 gallon per minute flows at pressures of more than 15 but less than 50 psi can also be commercially valuable. To supply 100 g.p.m. of water at 40 psi requires a K factor of about 16 (15.8). To supply the same amount of water at 30 psig requires a K factor of about 18.5 (18.3) while to supply the same amount of water at 20 psig requires a K factor of about 22.5 (22.4). The reduced diameter portion


14




b


of the internal passageway might have a diameter greater than 0.76 inches to yield a K-factor greater than 16, a diameter of about 0.85 inches to yield a nominal K-factor of about 20, a diameter of about 1.0 inch to yield a K-factor of about 30 and a diameter of about 1.2 inches to yield a K-factor of about 40.




Furthermore, investigations are underway with respect to the suppression of fires even more challenging than those addressed by the original ESFR sprinkler standards. These higher challenges include storage in warehouses piled up to forty feet under forty-five foot ceilings and up to forty-five feet under fifty-foot ceilings. High challenge fires have been successfully suppressed under the forgoing conditions with the aforesaid sprinkler. In particular, the aforesaid sprinkler has successfully suppressed fire in storage piled thirty feet high under thirty-five foot ceilings at 35 psi, in storage piled thirty-five feet high under forty foot ceilings at 40 psi, in storage piled thirty-five feet high under forty-five foot ceilings at 50 psi and in storage piled forty feet high under forty-five foot ceilings also at 50 psi. Applicants believe that water might similarly be supplied in even greater quantities at even lower flow pressures (but still of at least 15 psig to successfully control if not actually suppress such high challenge fires. For example, a flow rate of 120 gallons per minute can be supplied at a pressure of 15 psig (or less) by a K factor of about 31, 140 gallons per minute by a K factor of about 36, and 150 gallons per minute by a K factor of less than 40 (38.7). At pressures of 20 psig, 120 gallons per minute can be supplied by a K-factor of about 27 (26.8), 140 gallons per minute can be supplied by a K-factor of about 31.5 (31.3) and 150 gallons per minute can be supplied by a K-factor of about 33.5.





FIGS. 6-9

depict in varying views, a first sprinkler indicated generally at


110


, which is almost identical to sprinkler


10


of the previous figures but is modified to use a frangible, fluid containing glass bulb as part of the trigger.

FIGS. 10-12

depict in varying views, a second sprinkler indicated generally at


210


, which is also almost identical to sprinkler


10


of

FIGS. 1-5

but modified in a slightly different manner from sprinkler


110


to also use a fluid containing glass bulb as part of the trigger.




Each sprinkler


110


and


210


includes the same one-piece frame


11


as previously described having an at least generally tubular body indicated generally at


12


with a preferably tapered, central, internal passageway


14


extending straight between an inlet end


15


and a discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


with straight central axis A (see FIGS.


1


and


2


). Support arms


50


,


52


again extend generally away from opposite sides of the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


and meet to form a tubular knuckle


54


located along central axis A which supports deflector


60


positioned juxtaposed to, facing and spaced away from the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


. Each sprinkler


110


and


210


also includes closure


20


, which is releasably positioned at the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


so as to close the internal passageway


14


.




In sprinkler


110


, a heat responsive trigger indicated generally at


130


is provided and includes a frangible, fluid containing glass bulb


136


, which is mounted to releasably retain the closure


20


at the discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


closing the passageway


14


until the trigger


130


is activated. The preferred trigger


130


is an assembly which includes, in addition to bulb


136


, a pair of identical, generally L-shaped levers


132


and a yoke


134


. Each lever


132


again includes a short arm portion


132




a


, which is again positioned between lip


19


and the downstream end of the closure


20


, specifically the saddle


22


, releasably retaining the closure


20


in the internal passageway


14


closing the passageway. Long arm portions


132




b


of the levers


132


extend away from discharge end


16


of the tubular body


12


and passageway


14


and are held together by yoke


134


. Each long arm portion


132




b


preferably includes a central preferably triangular shaped window


132




c


to provide unobstructed heat flow through the levers


132


to the lateral sides of the bulb


136


. The distal end of each long portion


132




b


is also suggestedly curved, generally convexedly toward the bulb


136


, to help direct air currents toward the centered bulb


136


. Yoke


134


preferably is a one-piece, generally rectangularly-shaped body with a smaller central circular opening


134




a


which is preferably flanked by two, larger circular openings


134




b


(all in phantom). The smaller central opening receives and seats one longitudinal end of bulb


136


. The two larger openings permit air to pass through the yoke and circulate over the bulb


136


from below the sprinkler. The yoke


134


also preferably includes a pair of longitudinal tabs


134




c


, which extend through the windows


132




c


of levers


132


and turn away from the closure


20


so as to releasably engage the distal end of each lever


132


to prevent the distal ends from rotating away from each other and the bulb


136


, which movement is required to free the levers


132


and release the closure


20


. Bulb


136


is held in compression against the yoke


134


, holding the yoke in engagement with the levers


132


by a pedestal


38


.




Pedestal


138


includes a threaded central shaft


138




a


which is threaded into the central bore of central boss or hub


22




c


and which extends from one side of a bulb holder


138




b


. Holder


138




b


preferably includes a cupped depression


138




c


(

FIG. 9

) at its distal end, which receives the end of the bulb


136


most proximal to the closure


20


. The cupped depression is provided with an axial bore


138




d


which receives a pointed tip of the bulb


136


. Preferably a larger bore


138




e


is made transversely into the side of the holder to provide an internal opening in which the pointed tip of the bulb


136


can move without striking a hard surface within the holder which might cause the bulb to break prematurely.




Referring to

FIGS. 10-12

, trigger


230


of sprinkler


210


is very similar to original trigger


20


and includes the same levers


32


. A retainer includes a shaft


236




a


having one end threaded into the closure boss


22




c


and an opposing end threaded into a hollow receiver


236




b


. Receiver


236




b


releasably receives a plunger housing


238


which in turn is mated with a hollow cage


242


. One (or more) Belleville washers


234


are trapped between the plunger housing


238


and the receiver


236




b


. The washer


234


is also generally cupped with its concave side facing the closure


22


and receiving the distal ends of the levers


32


. The washer


234


replaces yoke


34


to hold the distal ends of the levers


32


together until the sprier


210


is activated. Plunger


238


and cage


242


are joined by adjustable means such as threading to define a hollow chamber which retains a plunger (like plunger


40


) and glass bulb


136


. The longitudinal end of bulb


136


proximal closure


22


is received in a recess in the head of the plunger. The cage


242


has openings (three)


242




a


at its distal end exposing the distal longitudinal end of the bulb


136


to the surrounding atmosphere. The plunger again supports a plurality of balls, like balls


48


, which extend through bores (not depicted) in the side walls of the plunger housing


238


and into an aligned, circumferential recess in the receiver


236




b


, thereby releasably engaging the receiver


236




b


and plunger housing


238


. The receiver


236


is held through saddle


22


and the remainder of the trigger


230


is coupled with the saddle


22


through the receiver


236


by means of the balls. The plunger can be forced against the balls by tightening of the cage


242


into the plunger housing


238


. When heated sufficiently, the bulb


136


will break, permitting the plunger to move and allow the balls to move into the plunger housing thereby permitting the plunger housing


238


and washer


234


to separate from the receiver


236


and release the levers


32


, respectively, thereby releasing closure


20


and permitting water (or other fire fighting fluid) to pass through the sprinkler body


12


.





FIG. 13

depicts very diagrammatically, the distinguishing distal end of yet another trigger embodiment indicated generally at


330


. The trigger includes asymmetric right and left levers


332


and


333


, respectively, an asymmetric yoke


334


and frangible, fluid-filled glass bulb


136


. Each lever


332


,


333


has a short arm portion (not depicted), bent to fit over a closure


22


and under lip


19


as before. Yoke


336


holds together the distal, longer ends of the levers


332


,


333


. Each lever includes an opening


332




a


,


333




a


, respectively, and proximal to bulb


136


. The portion of original left lever


333


cut to form opening


333




a


is bent generally perpendicularly to the plane of that lever to form a stop


333




b


, which contacts the inner side of right lever


332


and prevents the two levers,


332


,


333


from being brought closer together. Stop


332




b


includes a central depression


332




c


with opening, if necessary, to receive and seat the end bulb


136


proximal to the sprinkler closure. The extreme distal end of the levers


332


,


333


are held together by means of the yoke


334


, which is enlarged at one end


334




a


to form a “TEE” and is bent away from the stop


333




b


at its opposing longitudinal end to form a retaining tab


334




b


. The retaining tab


334




b


is maintained in an engaged position with lever


332


via the bulb


136


. Preferably, an adjustment screw


340


is provided in a threaded bore


334




c


in the yoke and has a central bore and a cup depression at the end facing the bulb


136


to receive and seat the bulb. When bulb


136


breaks, the retaining tab


334




b


is free to rotate out of engagement with lever


332


. Static pressure on the sprinkler is transmitted through the closure


22


to the levers


332


,


333


, which will separate and release the closure.




The bulb


136


may be a 2.5 mm, extra fast bulb supplied by Job GmbH of Hamburg, Germany or Norbulb GmbH of Norderfledt, Germany or smaller diameter bulb (e.g., a 2.0 mm bulb supplied by Job).




Sprinkler


110


, in particular, offers a simplified construction verses either sprinkler


10


or


210


. Moreover, sprinkler


210


with a glass bulb, is less subject to potential failure in the event of corrosive exposure than is sprinkler


10


.




The sprinklers


110


,


210


incorporate two stages of mechanical advantage for a significant load reduction. A first load reduction of about 4:1 occurs at the junction between the saddle


22


and levers


32


or


132


. The second reduction of about 5:1 occurs at the junction between the yoke


134


and bulb holder


138




b


or the Belleville washer


234


and plunger housing-cage


238


-


242


. The discharge end of the central passageway


14


is approximately 0.93 inches in diameter and includes an active seal area of approximately 0.74 in


2


. This translates to a 74 pounds of load per 100 PSIG of hydrostatic pressure. At 500 PSI, this load equals 370 pounds. (In contrast, a K-14 sprinkler has a seal area that is approximately 0.442 in


2


, which sees 44.2 pounds of load per 100 PSIG of pressure and about 220 pounds of load at 500 PSIG.)




Testing laboratories heretofore have imposed 500 PSI no leakage requirement and conducted 700 PSI hydrostatic tests on all sprinklers. At this pressure, the load on closure


20


increases to about 520 pounds for the K25 and 310 pounds for the K-14, both of which are considerably above compressive tolerance thresholds of known bulbs fast response bulbs, which are less than 4 mm in nominal diameter. While a linkage mechanism employing a single load reduction stage might be used, dual reduction is preferred because, under the same load conditions (e.g., 520 pounds) a bulb would see approximately 26 pounds of compressive loading, sufficient load reduction to permit the use of 2 mm (or even smaller) bulbs with higher temperature ratings (286° F. or higher) but with essentially the same RTI sensitivity of existing 200° F. 2.5 mm bulbs. The 2 mm bulbs would need to utilize thinner walls and hence be proportionately weaker.




The 4:1 reduction provided by the levers also reduces the frame load. Under 700 PSI hydrostatic load, the deflector/upper frame arms of a single-reduction mechanism would be subject to approximately 520 pounds of load, requiring a robust/stiff/thick component package. With dual reduction, the same components see only approximately about 130 lbs. of load under the 700 PSI hydrostatic test pressure.




It should be appreciated that yoke


134


is shaped with smaller tabs to act as a stop to prevent the bulb from being overcompressed by preventing the distal ends of levers


132


from coming too close to one another.




The undepicted short arm portions of levers


332


,


333


are suggestedly bent at an angle of about 105 degrees with respect to the generally parallel, long arm portions of those levers.




Bore


138




e


can be covered by means of a tubular sleeve on receiver


138




b


to prevent possible tampering with the bulb tip in the field. Bore


138




e


is intended to prevent the tip breakage that might occur during original assembly or accidental side loading of the levers during installation. Tip breakage potential increases as the diameter of the bulb decreases. This is due to tip end verses bulb body diameter ratio. In order to assure proper bulb seating and loading, the saddle or holder's vertical bore should reduce proportionally to the bulb's diameter.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,829,532 and Provisional Patent Application No. 60/124,607 filed Mar. 16, 1999 are incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.




It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the broad inventive concept thereof. It is understood, therefore, that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but it is intended to cover modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A low pressure, early suppression fast response sprinkler comprising:a generally tubular body having an inlet end, an opposing discharge end and an internal passageway extending between the inlet and discharge ends with a K factor greater than 16 where the K factor equals the flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by the square root of the pressure of water fed into the tubular body in pounds per square inch gauge; a deflector coupled with the tubular body and spaced from and generally aligned with the discharge end of the internal passageway so as to be impacted by a flow of water issuing from the discharge end of the passageway upon activation of the sprinkler, the deflector being configured and positioned to deflect the flow of water generally radially outwardly all around the sprinkler; a closure releasably positioned at the discharge end of the tubular body so as to close the internal passageway; and a heat responsive trigger in the form of a fluid containing glass bulb mounted to releasably retain the closure at the discharge end of the tubular body, the glass bulb having a response time index of less than 100 meter½sec½ (m½sec½).
  • 2. The sprinkler of claim 1, wherein the K factor is between 18 and 40.
  • 3. The sprinkler of claim 2, wherein the K factor is greater than 20.
  • 4. The sprinkler of claim 3, wherein the K factor is between 22 and 26.
  • 5. The sprinkler of claim 1, wherein the response time index is less than 80.0 m½sec½.
  • 6. The sprinkler of claim 5, wherein the response time index is less than 40 m½sec½.
  • 7. The sprinkler of claim 2, wherein the response time index is less than 80.0 m½sec ½.
  • 8. The sprinkler of claim 7, wherein the response time index is less than 80.0 m½sec½.
  • 9. The sprinkler of claim 3, wherein the response time index is less than 80.0 m½sec½.
  • 10. The sprinkler of claim 9, wherein the response time index is less than 40 m½sec½.
  • 11. The sprinkler of claim 4, wherein the response time index is less than 80.0 m½sec½.
  • 12. The sprinkler of claim 11, wherein the response time index is less than 40 m½sec½.
  • 13. The sprinkler of claim 1, wherein the deflector includes a plate member having a circular outer perimeter with an outer diameter and a plurality of slots extending inwardly from the outer perimeter and axially entirely through the plate member, the slots surrounding a circular slotless central area of the plate member, and the tubular body having a minimum central passageway diameter greater than a maximum diameter of the slotless central area.
  • 14. The sprinkler of claim 1 wherein a ratio of the minimum central passageway diameter to the circular central area diameter is greater than 1.3.
  • 15. The sprinkler of claim 14 wherein a ratio of the minimum central passageway diameter to the circular central area diameter is at least about 1.5.
  • 16. The sprinkler of claim 1, wherein the internal passageway of the tubular body has a minimum orifice diameter greater than 0.75 inches.
  • 17. The sprinkler of claim 1, wherein the internal passageway of the tubular body has a minimum orifice diameter greater than 0.85 inches.
  • 18. The sprinkler of claim 1, wherein the internal passageway of the tubular body has a minimum orifice diameter between 0.75 and 1.2 inches.
  • 19. The sprinkler of claim 1 wherein the heat responsive trigger is an assembly and includes at least a pair of levers maintained in an engagement position with the fluid-containing glass bulb so as to releasably retain the closure at the discharge end of the tubular body closing the internal passageway.
  • 20. The sprinkler of claim 19 wherein the assembly of the heat responsive trigger includes a third member directly engaged with each of the pair of levers and with the glass bulb so as to maintain the pair of levers in the engagement position.
  • 21. The sprinkler of claim 19 wherein the assembly of the heat responsive trigger further includes a plunger, a plurality of balls and a housing, the housing receiving the glass bulb, the plunger and the plurality of balls, the plunger being maintained in an engagement position with the plurality of balls by the glass bulb and the plurality of balls being maintained in an engagement position with the closure by the plunger.
  • 22. The sprinkler of claim 19 wherein the pair of levers provide a first stage of reduction in a compressive load imposed upon the glass bulb by the closure and wherein a remainder of the trigger assembly provides at least a second stage of reduction in the compressive load imposed on the glass bulb by the closure.
  • 23. The sprinkler of claim 22 wherein the first load reduction is at least 4 to 1.
  • 24. The sprinkler of claim 22 wherein the second load reduction is about 5 to 1.
  • 25. The sprinkler of claim 22 wherein the first and second stages provide a reduction of up to about 20 to 1 in the compressive load on the glass bulb from the closure.
  • 26. The sprinkler of claim 1 wherein the trigger is an assembly including a plurality of load-reducing components arranged to couple the glass bulb with the closure and to provide a reduction of at least 4 or more to 1 in a compressive load imposed upon the glass bulb by the closure through the remaining components of the trigger assembly.
  • 27. The sprinkler of claim 26 wherein the plurality of load reducing components of the trigger assembly provide at least two stages of load reduction between the closure and the glass bulb.
  • 28. The sprinkler of claim 26 wherein the plurality of load reducing components of the trigger assembly provide up to about a 20 to 1 reduction in compressive load on the glass bulb from the closure.
  • 29. The sprinkler of claim 1 wherein the glass bulb has nominal diameter less than 4 mm.
  • 30. The sprinkler of claim 1 wherein the bulb has a nominal 2.5 mm diameter.
  • 31. The sprinkler of claim 1 wherein the bulb has a nominal 2 mm diameter.
  • 32. A low pressure, fast response sprinkler comprising:a generally tubular body having an We t end, an opposing discharge end and an internal passageway extending between the inlet and discharge ends with a K factor greater than 16 where the K factor equals the flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by the square root of the pressure of water fed into the tubular body in pounds per square inch gauge; a deflector coupled with the tubular body and spaced from and generally aligned with the discharge end of the internal passageway so as to be impacted by a flow of water issuing from the discharge end of the passageway upon activation of the sprinkler, the deflector being configured and positioned to deflect the flow of water generally radially outwardly all around the sprinkler; a closure releasably positioned at the discharge end of the tubular body so as to close the internal passageway; and a heat responsive trigger mounted to releasably retain the closure at the discharge end of the tubular body, the trigger having a response time index of less than 100 meter½sec½; the sprinkler being supplied with water at the inlet end of the tubular body maintained at a pressure of 50 psig or less against the closure.
  • 33. The sprinkler of claim 32 wherein the supplied water is maintained at a pressure of less than 50 psig against the closure.
  • 34. The sprinkler of claim 32 wherein the supplied water is maintained at a pressure of up to about 40 psig against the closure.
  • 35. The sprinkler of claim 32 wherein the supplied water is maintained at a pressure of up to about 35 psig against the closure.
  • 36. The sprinkler of claim 32 wherein the supplied water is maintained at a pressure of up to about 20 psig against the closure.
  • 37. The sprinkler of claim 32 wherein the supplied water is maintained at a pressure of at least about 15 psig against the closure.
  • 38. An installed low pressure, fast response sprinkler comprising:a generally tubular body having an inlet end, an opposing discharge end and an internal passageway extending between the inlet and discharge ends with a K factor greater than 16 where the K factor equals the flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by the square root of the pressure of water fed into the tubular body in pounds per square inch gauge; a deflector coupled with the tubular body and spaced from and generally aligned with the discharge end of the internal passageway so as to be impacted by a flow of water issuing from the discharge end of the passageway upon activation of the sprinkler, the deflector being configured and positioned to deflect the flow of water generally radially outwardly all around the sprinkler; a heat responsive trigger mounted to releasably retain the closure at the discharge end of the tubular body, the trigger having a response time index of less than 100 meter½sec½; a water supply coupled with the inlet end of the tubular body designed to maintain a water pressure of about 50 psig or less against the closure.
  • 39. The sprinkler of claim 38 wherein the water supply is designed to maintain a water pressure of between 15 and 50 psig against the closure.
  • 40. The sprinkler of claim 38 wherein the water supply is designed to maintain a water pressure of between 15 and about 40 psig against the closure.
  • 41. The sprinkler of claim 38, wherein the water supply is designed to maintain a water pressure of between 15 and about 35 psig against the closure.
  • 42. The sprinkler of claim 38, wherein the water supply is designed to maintain a water pressure of between 15 and about 20 psig against the closure.
  • 43. The sprinkler of claim 38 installed beneath a ceiling having a h eight no more than forty feet.
  • 44. The sprinkler of claim 43 wherein the water supply i s designed to maintain a water pressure of between 15 and 40 psig against the closure.
  • 45. The sprinkler of claim 38 installed beneath a ceiling having a height no more than fifty feet.
  • 46. An installed, low pressure, fast response sprinkler comprising:a generally tubular body having an inlet end, an opposing discharge end and an internal passageway extending between the inlet and discharge ends with a K factor greater than 16 where the K factor equals the flow of water in gallons per minute through the internal passageway divided by the square root of the pressure of water fed into the tubular body in pounds per square inch gauge; a deflector coupled with the tubular body and spaced from and generally aligned with the discharge end of the internal passageway so as to be impacted by a flow of water issuing from the discharge end of the passageway upon activation of the sprinkler, the deflector being configured and positioned to deflect the flow of water generally radially outwardly all around the sprinkler; a heat responsive trigger mounted to releasably retain the closure at the discharge end of the tubular body, the trigger having a response time index of less than 100 meter½sec½; the sprinkler being installed beneath a ceiling at a height of less than fifty feet.
  • 47. The sprinkler of claim 46 in stalled beneath a ceiling forty-five feet or less in height.
  • 48. The sprinkler of claim 46 installed beneath a ceiling forty feet or less in height.
  • 49. The sprinkler of claim 46 installed beneath a ceiling thirty-five feet or less in height.
  • 50. The sprinkler of claim 46 installed at a height of thirty feet or less.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 09/183,990 filed Nov. 2, 1998, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/813,780, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,829,532, and a continuation-in-part of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/124,607 filed Mar. 16, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (29)
Number Name Date Kind
3525402 Hattori Aug 1970 A
3682251 Livingston Aug 1972 A
3722596 Livingston Mar 1973 A
3768736 Cox Oct 1973 A
3811511 McCulloch May 1974 A
3888313 Freeman Jun 1975 A
3904126 Allard Sep 1975 A
4091873 Werner May 1978 A
4099675 Wohler et al. Jul 1978 A
4136740 Groos et al. Jan 1979 A
4279309 Fischer et al. Jul 1981 A
4359097 Claussen Nov 1982 A
4405018 Fischer Sep 1983 A
4580729 Pounder Apr 1986 A
4657085 Jacobsen Apr 1987 A
4800961 Klein Jan 1989 A
4893679 Martin et al. Jan 1990 A
4901799 Pepi et al. Feb 1990 A
4930578 Barnett et al. Jun 1990 A
5036923 Shea Aug 1991 A
5094298 Polan Mar 1992 A
5366022 Meyer et al. Nov 1994 A
5579846 Meyer et al. Dec 1996 A
5584344 Meyer et al. Dec 1996 A
5609211 Meyer et al. Mar 1997 A
5622225 Sundholm Apr 1997 A
5664630 Meyer et al. Sep 1997 A
5829532 Meyer et al. Nov 1998 A
5853215 Lowery Dec 1998 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (40)
Entry
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., UL 1767, “Standard for Safety, Early-Suppression Fast-Response Sprinklers”, First Edition, Feb., 1990.
Factory Mutual Engineering Corp., “Loss Prevention Data, 2-2”, “Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinklers”, Apr., 1987.
Factory Mutual Research, “Approval Standard, Early Suppression Fast Response Automatic Sprinklers”, Jun., 1986.
“Automatic” Sprinkler Corporation of America product sheets entitled “Automatic ESFR Glass Bulb Sprinkler”, Feb., 1988, (pp. J 5.3, J 5.4).
ASCOA Fire Systems data sheets entitled, “Automatic ESFR Glass Bulb Sprinkler”, Mar., 1992, (pp. 1.1, 1.2).
Grinnell Corporation data sheets entitled “Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinklers/Model ESFR-1 Pendent, 14.3 K-Factor”, Apr., 1988.
Reliable Automatic Sprinkler product announcement, “ESFR, Model H Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinkler”, Oct., 1992, (3 pp. total).
Central Sprinkler Company catalog sheets entitled, “Central ESFR-1 3-93/ESFR Early Suppression Fast Response”, 4 pp. Mar., 1993.
Drawing entitled “International Jumbo Sprinkler Head—Deflector”, Dwg. No. 1-117, Automatic Sprinkler Co. of America, Mar., 1926 (1 pg.).
Sheet entitled “Grinnell Jumbo Sprinkler Issue A”, Grinnell Corp., Feb., 1969, (1 pg.).
Drawing entitled “Solder Type—Issue “A” 1¼″ Grinnell Jumbo Sprinkler Yoke, Body, Strut, Diaphragm and Disc”, General Fire Extinguisher Company, Apr., 1917 (1 pg.).
Drawing entitled “1″ Grinnell Jumbo Sprinkler Detail Solder Type Isse ‘A’”, General Fire Extinguisher Co., Apr., 1917, (1 pg.).
N.J. Thompson, Fire Behavior and Sprinklers, Chapter 6 “Automatic Sprinkler Protection”, National Fire Protection Association, 1964, Cover, Foreward, Table of Contents and pp. 72-91.
Newsletter for Fire Protection Engineers and Industry, No. 11, Jul., 1965, Orinda, California, (8 pp.).
D.G. Goodfellow, et al., Technical Report entitled “Optimization of Sprinkler Protection for United States Postal Service III. Protection of Plastic Letter Trays”, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Oct., 1971 (39 pp.).
D.G. Goodfellow, Technical Report entitled “Optimization of Sprinkler Protection for United States Postal Facilities/IV Protection of Plastic Letter Trays with 0.64-in. Retrofit Sprinklers”, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, Jul., 1974 (30 pp. with cover and introductory pages).
E.W.J. Troup, Technical Report entitled “New Developments in Ceiling-Level Protection for the High-Challenge Fire”, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, January, 1974.
P.J. Chicarello et al., Technical Report entitled Large-Scale Fire Test Evaluation of Early Suppression Fast Response (ESFR) Automatic Sprinklers, Factory Mutual Research Corporation, (cover—p. 18 and pp. 122-128), May, 1986.
C. Yao, “The Development of the ESFR Sprinkler System”, Fire Safety Journal, Elsevier Scientific Ltd. Kidlington, Oxford, U.K., vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 65-73, 1988.
C. Yao, “Overview of FMRC's Sprinkler Technology Research”, Factory Mutual Research Corp., May, 1992.
Approved Product News, Factory Mutual Engineering Corp., vol. 4, No. 2, Dec., 1988, pp. 1-5, 8-12 and 16.
Fire Protection Handbook, Seventeenth Edition, National Fire Protection Association, 1991, Title page, inner page, Table of Contents p. IX and pp. 5-127 through 5-163 and 5-174 through 5-197.
K. Bell, “Presentation to American Fire Sprinkler Association—Large K-Factor Sprinklers”, Nov., 1992, (59 pp. total: 19 pp. text and 40 pp. slide photocopies).
Color photocopies of six color photographs of sprinkler cast with “I.S. Co.” on deflector and “PAT.03” on the body and “1903” stamped on the release link (labeled Jun., 1995) (2pp.).
Color photocopies of six color photographs of sprinkler cast with “Globe” and “280” on body, “G A S Co.” on deflector and stamped “1926” on release link (labeled Jun., 1995) (2 pp.).
Color photocopies of five color photographs of Grinnell Corporation “Jumbo A” automatic sprinkler—1¼″ orifice, (labeled Jun., 1995) (2 pp.).
Color photocopies of five color photographs of Grinnell Corporation “Jumbo A” automatic sprinkler—1″ orifice, (labeled Jun., 1995) (2 pp.) (body painted red).
Standard for Installation of Sprinkler Systems NFPA 13 National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1994 Edition, pp. 13-1 through 13-124.
Meeting Minutes, New Technology Task Group and Working Group Meetings at Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Northbrook, IL, Jun. 23-24, 1994, 8 pp..
Meeting Minutes, NFPA 13 New Technology Task Group Special Task Force, Jun. 24, 1994 Meeting, Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., 4 pp..
Meeting Minutes, NFPA 13 New Technology Task Group Special Task Force, Aug. 2 and 3, 1994 at National Fire Protection Association, 6 pp..
Meeting Minutes (draft), NFPA 13 New Technology Task Group Special Task Force, Sep. 13 and 14, 1994 at NFPA, 2 pp..
Meeting Minutes, National Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc. Engineering and Standards Committee, Sep. 22-23, 1994 at Burlington, VT. 15 pp..
Meeting Minutes, NFPA 13 New Technology Task Group, Feb. 23, 1995 at Chantilly, VA 3 pp..
Sprinkler Tech Notes, National Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc., Patterson, NY, vol. XVIII No. 4, Jul./Aug., 1995, 4 pp..
1996 Annual Meeting Report on Proposals, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, Aug., 1995, pp. 693-804.
Meeting Minutes, National Fire Sprinkler Association, Engineering and Standards Committees, Sep. 28-29, 1995 at , Reno, NV, 14 pp..
1996 Annual Meeting Report on Comments, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1996, pp. 172-204.
NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, Jul., 1996, pp. 13-1 through 13-148 plus r unnumbered sheets.
M. Puchovsky, Entering the Next 100 Years of Standardized Sprinkler System Technology, Sprinkler Age, American Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc., Dallas, TX, vol. 15, No. 3, Mar., 1998, pp. 5, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18 and 19.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/124607 Mar 1999 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/813780 Mar 1997 US
Child 09/183990 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/183990 Nov 1998 US
Child 09/526908 US