Not applicable.
The present invention relates to mechanical attachment mechanisms in general, and more particularly to mechanisms for releasably connecting a flexible strap to another element.
In attaching ballistic armor vests to a soldier or police officer, it is necessary to adjust the segments of armor to a proper fit to properly position the armor and to restrain unnecessary movement of the armor. This is usually achieved in part by a system of flexible straps which are received within buckles.
Current solutions either rely on a buckle having a single loop which is weak and prone to breaking (plastic) or bending (metal). The market continues to use these because it rarely sees them break. They generally function acceptably well for daily use, but break immediately in emergency situations such as when wounded persons must be dragged by their gear to safety or lifted by their gear into a vehicle.
In some prior art arrangements, a double loop is used to add friction. One problem with this configuration is that it still puts the vast majority of the force on to a single loop. The double loop buckle assembly adds more friction than the single loop, but can slip as more force is applied. Additionally, the two loops can move freely in relation to each other and often end up becoming misaligned.
Locking hardware is available but it is generally heavy and bulky. The sliding bars generally used in these add a significant thickness to the assembly that is uncomfortable when worn on the shoulder and prone to malfunction due to grit, sand, mud, or corrosion. The long overall length of these buckles also limits the area where it can be placed, and the amount of adjustment one can obtain from it. In the case of ballistic vests a long buckle can lead to an unacceptably large gap between the torso and shoulder portions of the protective vest where a buckle is generally needed. These do provide good “locking” under load however.
Some available flat 2-loop buckles do not function well when used on a tightly curved surface like a shoulder strap. Because they are flat, the loops tend to separate when bent around a curve and allow the strap to slide through. The present invention with a second loop that is bent solves this problem.
Conventional buckles are either generic loops or hardware purpose built for a specific niche industry such as parachuting. What is needed is a buckle specifically designed to meet the needs of the protective vest industry, and in particular vest shoulder strap adjustment buckles. What is needed is an attachment buckle assembly which is high strength (>300 lb failure), lightweight, low-profile in elevation (not thick), short in overall length; and which does not loosen under load.
Further objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The present invention is an attachment buckle assembly which is high strength, lightweight, low-profile in elevation, short in overall length, and which does not loosen under load.
Further objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring more particularly to
The attachment mechanism 20 has a first loop 22, shown in
The second loop 23 is a generally square ring that is formed to have a step, such that a front member 34 is displaced upwardly from a rear member 36, and connected by two parallel side members 38 which each have a ramp 40 formed therein. The loop 23 has an interior central opening 39.
The first loop 22 rear member 28 is significantly shorter in the front to back direction than is the second loop 23 rear member 36. This insures that the strap 25 feeding through both loops 22, 23 only applies pressure to the second loop which has a much wider rear portion, for example, about 1.4 times the dimension of the first loop rear member 28. This insures that the assembly does not loosen under load, instead it gets tighter as more load is applied.
The bend in the second loop 23 defined by the ramps 40 disposes the front member 34 of the second loop in the same plane as the locking portion forward projection 32 of the first loop 22. The ramped side members 38 provide “tracks” that constrain the side-to-side movement of the first flat loop 22, only allowing it to move front-to-back. This helps keep the loops in proper alignment to one another.
The first loop 22 overlies the second loop 23, and a fixed strap 42 encircles the rear members 28, 36 and is affixed such as by sewing to a shoulder element 44 of a ballistic vest 46, as shown in
As tension is applied to the adjustable strap 46, the first loop is pulled into engagement with the second loop, and the forward projection 32 of the first loop 22 extends toward the front member of the second loop 23. Greater tension causes the forward projection 32 to clamp the strap 46 more securely against the second member front member, as the first loop side members are urged upwardly along the ramps 40 of the second loop.
An alternative embodiment attachment mechanism 48 is shown in
Another alternative embodiment attachment mechanism 56 is shown in
It is understood that the invention is not limited to the particular construction and arrangement of parts herein illustrated and described, but embraces all such modified forms thereof as come within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional 60/975,737, filed Sep. 27, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
686934 | Clark | Nov 1901 | A |
2563809 | Ash | Aug 1951 | A |
2853757 | Rave | Sep 1958 | A |
3277543 | Gaylord | Oct 1966 | A |
3407452 | Abert et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3813734 | Schauweker et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4414713 | Prete, Jr. | Nov 1983 | A |
4670945 | Banks | Jun 1987 | A |
4962572 | Prentkowski | Oct 1990 | A |
5205021 | Durand | Apr 1993 | A |
5432984 | Petzl | Jul 1995 | A |
5915535 | Henrekin-Jordan | Jun 1999 | A |
6170091 | Zide et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6539592 | Choi et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
7100249 | Hurn | Sep 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090083948 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60975737 | Sep 2007 | US |