1. Field of the Invention (Technical Field) test (DUT).
The present invention relates to probes for making electrical contact to a device under
2. Description of Related Art
Probes for making electrical contact to a device under test (DUT) are typically resilient devices that deform in a controllable manner in use. Probe deformation can perform various functions, such as providing a suitable scrub motion between probe tip and contact pad to facilitate making a reliable electrical contact. The shape of a probe has a significant effect on its deformation properties, and accordingly many kind of probe shapes have been considered in the art. Representative examples of known probe shapes include U.S. Pat. No. 6,707,311, U.S. Pat. No. 6,482,013, U.S. Pat. No. 6,278,284, U.S. Pat. No. 5,832,601, U.S. Pat. No. 6,956,389, U.S. Pat. No. 6,677,245, and US 2003/0027423.
Various probe fabrication methods have been employed to make such probes. One of these methods is referred to as micro-fabrication, and entails building up a probe (or probe array) by deposition of appropriately patterned layers having probe material and sacrificial material, such that eventual removal of the sacrificial material exposes the fabricated probe(s). Micro-fabrication approaches typically impose an overall height limit on the fabricated probe. A typical height limit for micro-fabrication is on the order of 0.8 mm. The existence of some such limit is unsurprising, since deposition of an unlimited number of layers is unlikely to be practical.
Probes provided by micro-fabrication have been considered in the art, Examples include the probes of US 2005/0189958, U.S. Pat. No. 6,917,525, U.S. Pat. No. 6,218,203, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,027,630, where several zigzag and folded probe geometries are considered. Many of these probe designs can be regarded as a scaling of known probe geometries to comply with the vertical height limit of probe micro-fabrication.
However, we have found that such scaling of known probe geometries to comply with the height limit of probe micro-fabrication tends to provide probes having unfavorable performance characteristics. In particular, it is difficult to obtain sufficient lateral scrub motion from conventional probe geometries scaled to comply with a height limit on the order of 0.8 mm.
Accordingly, it would be an advance in the art to provide a probe geometry for providing improved lateral scrub motion while complying with a vertical height limit.
According to the invention, a vertically folded probe can provide improved scrub performance in cases where the probe height is limited. More specifically, such a probe includes a base and a tip, and an arm extending from the base to the tip as a single continuous member. The probe arm is vertically folded, such that it includes three or more vertical arm portions. The vertical arm portions have substantial vertical overlap, and are laterally displaced from each other. When such a probe is vertically brought down onto a device under test, the probe deforms. During probe deformation, at least two of the vertical arm portions come into contact with each other. Such contact between the arm portions can advantageously increase the lateral scrub motion at the probe tip, and can also advantageously reduce the probe inductance
Objects, advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating one or more preferred embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. In the drawings:
a-b show two views of a probe according to an embodiment of the invention.
a-c show a probe according to an embodiment of the invention in various deformation conditions.
a-b show two exemplary options for mounting probes according to an embodiment of the invention.
a-b show embodiments of the invention having probes orthogonally and diagonally aligned with respect to an array of contact pads.
a-b show two views of a probe according to an embodiment of the invention. The probe includes a probe base 102, a probe tip 114, and an arm 104 extending from probe base 102 to probe tip 114 as a continuous member. Arm 104 includes three or more vertical arm portions, which in this example are labeled as 106, 108, and 110. The vertical arm portions are substantially parallel to a direction of relative motion between probe and DUT as contact is made. The vertical arm portions are laterally displaced from each other, as shown. Finally, the vertical arm portions have a substantial vertical overlap with each other, also as shown. The net effect of these geometrical constraints is to ensure that arm 104 is folded vertically from base 102 to tip 114, as opposed to being folded horizontally between base 102 and tip 114.
Optionally, probe arm 104 can include a lateral termination 112, on which probe tip 114 is located. Also optionally, probe tip 114 can include a reduced width protrusion 116 to facilitate making electrical contact.
a-c show a probe according to an embodiment of the invention in various deformation conditions.
In the initial stages of the contact motion, gap C becomes narrower as the contact motion proceeds, and eventually vertical arm portions 108 and 110 make contact as shown on
This specific probe deformation can provide significant advantages. A first advantage is that a relatively large lateral scrub motion can be achieved in a probe configuration having a relatively small total vertical height. It is important that the scrub motion be sufficient to effectively remove oxide and other impediments to reliable electrical contact. In one design example, a lateral scrub of 50 μm or more was achieved with a probe configuration having a total height on the order of 0.8 mm (i.e., consistent with a typical micro-fabrication height limit). The total length of the vertically folded probe arm in this example was 1.5 mm.
A second advantage is that the contact formed between vertical arm portions 108 and 110 on
The amount of lateral scrub provided by the probe of
Probes according to the invention can be fabricated from any mechanically resilient and electrically conductive material. Suitable materials for probe base 102, probe arm 104 and probe tip 114 are well known in the art, and any such materials can be employed in practicing the invention. Suitable tip materials are electrically conductive and wear-resistant, and include Rh and Cr. As indicated above, the invention can be especially advantageous in connection with micro-fabrication, but probes according to the invention can be fabricated via any probe fabrication method. Suitable methods include, but are not limited to, standard multi-layer metal deposition techniques such as plating and sputtering; photolithographic techniques; micro-fabrication and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) techniques.
a-b show two exemplary options for mounting probes according to an embodiment of the invention.
A key point of this example is that the mechanical stresses arising from probe deformation do not reach solder bump 318, which tends to be mechanically weak. Instead, these stresses reach the junction between probe base 102 and pad 306 and the junction between pad 306 and carrier 304, and both junctions can have mechanical strength comparable to that of the probe itself. By ensuring that mechanical stress from probe deformation does not reach the solder bumps, mechanical reliability can be improved.
a-b show embodiments of the invention having probes orthogonally and diagonally aligned with respect to an array of contact pads.
In cases where a dense array of contact bumps is to be probed, it is preferred for the probe array to have probes which are disposed diagonally with respect to the contact bump array, e.g., as shown on
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/635,809, entitled “Low Profile Probe Having Improved Mechanical Scrub and Reduced Contact Inductance”, to January Kister, filed on Dec. 6, 2006, which claimed priority to and the benefit of the filing of U.S. provisional application 60/748,438, entitled “Micro-Fabricated Low Profile Probe”, to January Kister, filed on Dec. 7, 2005, and the specifications and claims of all the applications listed above are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3518612 | Dunman et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3599093 | Oates | Aug 1971 | A |
3710251 | Hagge et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3812311 | Kvaternik | May 1974 | A |
4027935 | Byrnes et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4115736 | Tracy | Sep 1978 | A |
4116523 | Coberly et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4423376 | Byrnes et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4525697 | Jones et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4532423 | Tojo et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4567433 | Ohkubo et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4593961 | Cosmo | Jun 1986 | A |
4618767 | Smith et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4618821 | Lenz | Oct 1986 | A |
4706019 | Richardson | Nov 1987 | A |
4730158 | Kasai et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4747698 | Wickramasinghe et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757255 | Margozzi | Jul 1988 | A |
4772846 | Reeds | Sep 1988 | A |
4773877 | Kruger et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4807159 | Komatsu et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4901013 | Benedetto et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4967148 | Doemens et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5015947 | Chism | May 1991 | A |
5026291 | David | Jun 1991 | A |
5030318 | Reche | Jul 1991 | A |
5061192 | Chapin et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067007 | Otsuka et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5145384 | Asakawa et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5205739 | Malo et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5207585 | Byrnes | May 1993 | A |
5225771 | Leedy | Jul 1993 | A |
5230632 | Baumberger et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5237743 | Busacco et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5354205 | Feigenbaum et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5399982 | Driller | Mar 1995 | A |
5422574 | Kister | Jun 1995 | A |
5430614 | Difrancesco | Jul 1995 | A |
5436571 | Karasawa | Jul 1995 | A |
5476211 | Khandros | Dec 1995 | A |
5531022 | Beaman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5576631 | Stowers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5632631 | Fjelstad et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635846 | Beaman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644249 | Kister | Jul 1997 | A |
5676599 | Ricks et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5720098 | Kister | Feb 1998 | A |
5742174 | Kister et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751157 | Kister | May 1998 | A |
5764070 | Pedder | Jun 1998 | A |
5764072 | Kister | Jun 1998 | A |
5764409 | Colvin | Jun 1998 | A |
5767691 | Verkuil | Jun 1998 | A |
5772451 | Dozier, II et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773987 | Montoya | Jun 1998 | A |
5802699 | Fjelstad et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806181 | Khandros et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821763 | Beamann et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829128 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832601 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852871 | Khandros | Dec 1998 | A |
5864946 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884395 | Dabrowiecki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892539 | Colvin | Apr 1999 | A |
5914613 | Gleason et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917707 | Khandros et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923178 | Higgins et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926951 | Khandros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932323 | Throssel | Aug 1999 | A |
5934914 | Fjelstad et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936421 | Stowers et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945836 | Sayre et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952843 | Vinh | Sep 1999 | A |
5969533 | Takagi | Oct 1999 | A |
5970167 | Colvin | Oct 1999 | A |
5974662 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994152 | Khandros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6027630 | Cohen | Feb 2000 | A |
6029344 | Khandros et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031282 | Jones et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6064215 | Kister | May 2000 | A |
6066957 | Van Loan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071630 | Tomaru et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086386 | Fjelstad et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6133072 | Fjelstad | Oct 2000 | A |
6184576 | Jones et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6204674 | Dabrowiecki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205660 | Fjelstad et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215320 | Parrish | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218203 | Khoury et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246245 | Akram et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246247 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247228 | Distefano et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255126 | Mathieu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259261 | Engelking et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278284 | Mori et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292003 | Fredrickson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6334247 | Beaman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336269 | Eldridge et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344753 | Takada et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6411112 | Das et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419500 | Kister | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420887 | Kister et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424164 | Kister | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433571 | Montoya | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437584 | Gleason et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441315 | Eldridge et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443784 | Kimoto | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6482013 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6486689 | Nishikawa | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6525552 | Kister | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529021 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530148 | Kister | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566898 | Theissen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6570396 | Kister | May 2003 | B1 |
6573738 | Matsuo et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6575767 | Satoh et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6576485 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586955 | Fjelstad et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6615485 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624648 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633176 | Takemoto et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641430 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6646455 | Maekawa et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6676438 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6677245 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6707311 | Hohenwarter | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727719 | Liao et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731123 | Kimoto | May 2004 | B2 |
6765228 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6825422 | Eldridge et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6842023 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847221 | Kimoto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853208 | Okubo et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6881974 | Wood et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890185 | Kister et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6897666 | Swettlen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
D507198 | Kister | Jul 2005 | S |
6917102 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917525 | Mok et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
D510043 | Kister | Sep 2005 | S |
6956389 | Mai | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6965244 | Miller | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965245 | Kister et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970005 | Rincon et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7015707 | Cherian | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046021 | Kister | May 2006 | B2 |
7059865 | Kister et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064564 | Kister et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
D525207 | Kister et al. | Jul 2006 | S |
7071715 | Shinde et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7073254 | Eldridge et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078921 | Haga et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088118 | Liu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7091729 | Kister | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109731 | Gleason et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7148709 | Kister | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7150658 | Chien | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7173441 | Kister et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7189078 | Kister et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202682 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7217138 | Kister et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218127 | Cooper et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218131 | Tanioka et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225538 | Eldridge et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7227371 | Miller | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265565 | Chen et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274195 | Takemoto et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285966 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7312617 | Kister | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7345492 | Kister | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7417447 | Kister | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7436192 | Kister | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7511523 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514948 | Kister | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7649367 | Kister | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7659739 | Kister | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20010012739 | Grube et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010040460 | Beaman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020070743 | Felici et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020153913 | Okubo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194730 | Shih et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030027423 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030116346 | Forster et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040036493 | Miller | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040104737 | Haga et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119485 | Koch et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040239352 | Mizoguchi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050179458 | Chen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189955 | Takemoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050189958 | Chen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060033516 | Rincon et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060073712 | Suhir | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082380 | Tanioka et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060170440 | Sudin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060171425 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070167022 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080074132 | Fan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4237591 | May 1994 | DE |
63-307678 | Dec 1988 | JP |
7-021968 | Jan 1995 | JP |
7-333232 | Dec 1995 | JP |
10-506238 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-221374 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11241690 | Sep 1999 | JP |
WO 8704568 | Jul 1987 | WO |
WO9210010 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9615458 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9637332 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO9743653 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO0109623 | Feb 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100109691 A1 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60748438 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11635809 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12684272 | US |