1. Field of Invention
The present invention is directed to a low-profile right angle electrical connector assembly having six board-mount connectors that allow for the right angle connection of cable connectors to a low profile Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (“PCIe”) card such that the assembly has a total of 48 differential pairs of signal contacts capable of carrying multi-gigabit per second serial bus signals (such as HyperTransport® and/or PCIe Gen-III) with high signal fidelity. In some embodiments, each cable connector includes a replaceable latch that helps secure the cable connectors relative to the board-mount connectors.
2. Description of Related Art
Traditional low-profile PCIe card connector assemblies only contain four board-mount connectors because the connectors are too large to allow six connectors to fit in the space required by the PCIe specification. Even with eight differential pairs per connector, these other connector assemblies would only have a total of thirty-two differential pairs, which means that each connector assembly would have a maximum of 16 lanes PHY per low-profile PCIe form factor card. These traditional connector assemblies result in undesirable latency (i.e., reduction in the speed and processing of data) and cannot be used to create complex topologies like 3D Torus or Flat Butterfly networks because these multidimensional network topologies need 24 lanes of signals, i.e. a total of 48 differential pairs of signal contacts. 3D Torus networks and other multidimensional topologies allow for energy-proportional computing and enable a reduction of the server's interconnection energy consumption of approximately one-fourth of the consumption of the traditional switched networks. Considering that most modern servers used in datacenters are designed to accommodate only low-profile PCIe cards, using standard connectors would not enable the realization of the type of power reduction and efficiency improvements afforded by low-profile PCIe with a total of 48 differential pairs of signal contacts.
Thus, there is a need in the art for a PCIe card assembly with an increased number of board-mount connectors that allow for the secure right angle connection to a corresponding number of cable connectors while maintaining signal fidelity and meeting the low-profile PCIe card requirements.
Embodiments of the invention provide a low-profile right-angle connector assembly with six board-mount connectors that allow cable connectors to connect to a low-profile PCIe card. The six board-mount connectors are housed within a PCIe bracket and a cover or shell, which may be an electro-magnetic interference (“EMI”) shielding shell in some embodiments, that are braced to the low profile PCIe card. Each of the six board-mount connectors has eight differential pairs for a total of 48 differential pairs compared to conventional four-connector arrangements that contain only 32 differential pairs. The use of six board-mount connectors allows for the implementation of complex 3D interconnection topologies, reduces the diameter of the network, and enables more servers to be reached with fewer hops relative to implementations that use four connectors and 2D topologies, resulting in greater performance, lower latency, and cost benefits. Additionally, in some embodiments, an LED display of the link status may be provided, which can be an important factor for system administrators in a complex network topology scenario. The various embodiments of the invention allow improved capabilities and efficiencies, particularly when used with standard high density servers, including switchless large direct connect topologies, lower infrastructure cost, lower power consumption, lower operation costs, simplified cabling compared with traditional connectors, improved fault tolerance, and improved reliability.
In general, in one aspect, embodiments of the invention relate to an electrical connector assembly affording a right angle electrical connection to a low profile PCIe printed circuit board. The connector assembly comprises, among other things, at least one board-mount connector, at least one cable connector detachably coupled to the at least one board-mount connector, and a PCIe bracket, wherein the at least one board-mount connector contains a total of forty-eight differential signal pairs.
In some embodiments, the differential signal pairs are pin contacts. In some embodiments, the differential signal pairs are socket contacts. In some embodiments, the at least one cable connector is a male connector having pin contacts. In some embodiments, the at least one cable connector is a female connector having socket contacts.
In some embodiments, the at least one board-mount connector comprises seven overmolded lead frame assemblies. In some embodiments, each one of the seven overmolded lead frame assemblies comprises a lead frame and a pin wafer. In some embodiments, each one of the seven overmolded lead frame assemblies comprises a lead frame and a socket wafer. In some embodiments, the seven overmolded lead frames assemblies further comprise a depression.
In some embodiments, the at least one board-mount connector comprises an LED. In some embodiments, the at least one cable connector comprises a latch. In some embodiments, the at least one cable connector comprises a ground strap having three ground tabs and secures two cable members together.
In general, in another aspect, embodiments of the invention relate to an electrical connector assembly having a latch. The electrical connector assembly comprises, among other things, a board-mount connector, a cable connector configured to be detachably coupled to the board-mount connector, and a connector cover substantially enclosing the board-mount connector, the connector cover having a receptacle housing configured to receive the cable connector. The electrical connector assembly further comprises a resilient latch attached to the cable connector, the resilient latch configured to releasably engage the receptacle housing of the connector cover to secure the cable connector relative to the board-mount connector.
In some embodiments, the receptacle housing of the connector cover includes a latch opening and the resilient latch includes a latch stop configured to engage a leading edge of the latch opening. In some embodiments, the cable connector includes a latch anchor and the resilient latch includes an anchor tab configured to removably engage the latch anchor of the cable connector to releasably secure the resilient latch relative to the cable connector. In some embodiments, the cable connector includes one or more hook supports and the resilient latch includes one or more hooks configured to removably engage the one or more hook supports to releasably secure the resilient latch relative to the cable connector. In some embodiments, the cable connector includes one or more slots and the resilient latch includes one or more guide tabs configured to removably engage the one or more slots to releasably secure the resilient latch relative to the cable connector. In some embodiments, the connector cover is made of a material that helps protect the board-mount connector from electromagnetic interference.
In general, in another aspect, embodiments of the invention relate to an electrical connector having a latch. The electrical connector comprises, among other things, a cable connector, a resilient latch anchor formed on the cable connector, a latch attached to the cable connector, and an anchor tab formed in the resilient latch, the anchor tab configured to engage the latch anchor to releasably secure the latch to the cable connector.
In some embodiments, the resilient latch includes a head section and a base section generally parallel to one another and further includes a body section forming an interconnecting diagonal therebetween. In some embodiments, the anchor tab is formed in the body section of the resilient latch and includes an anchor opening, the anchor opening having a size and shape to provide a precise fit around the anchor tab to releasably secure the latch to the cable connector. In some embodiments, the latch anchor includes an inclined surface configured to allow the anchor tab to be slid up the inclined surface. In some embodiments, in the head section of the resilient latch includes an ovoid latch stop formed therein. In some embodiments, the cable connector includes two parallel longitudinally extending ridges and the resilient latch is disposed between the parallel longitudinally extending ridges.
Additional and/or alternative aspects of the invention will become apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art from the accompanying drawings and following detailed description of the disclosed embodiments.
The apparatus of the invention is further described and explained in relation to the following figures of the drawing wherein:
The figures described above and the written description of specific structures and functions below are not presented to limit the scope of what Applicants have invented or the scope of the appended claims. Rather, the figures and written description are provided to teach any person skilled in the art to make and use the inventions for which patent protection is sought. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that not all features of a commercial embodiment of the inventions are described or shown for the sake of clarity and understanding. Persons of skill in this art will also appreciate that the development of an actual commercial embodiment incorporating aspects of the present inventions will require numerous implementation-specific decisions to achieve the developer's ultimate goal for the commercial embodiment. Such implementation-specific decisions may include, and likely are not limited to, compliance with system-related, business-related, government-related and other constraints, which may vary by specific implementation, location, and from time to time. While a developer's efforts might be complex and time-consuming in an absolute sense, such efforts would be, nevertheless, a routine undertaking for those of skill in this art having benefit of this disclosure. It must be understood that the inventions disclosed and taught herein are susceptible to numerous and various modifications and alternative forms. Lastly, the use of a singular term, such as, but not limited to, “a,” is not intended as limiting of the number of items. Also, the use of relational terms, such as, but not limited to, “top,” “bottom,” “left,” “right,” “upper,” “lower,” “down,” “up,” “side,” and the like are used in the written description for clarity in specific reference to the figures and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or the appended claims.
As shown in at least
Low profile PCIe add-in cards are governed by the industry standards set forth in the PCI Express® Card Electromechanical Specification. In particular the standard sets forth height, length, width, and other form factor parameters in the section titled “Add-in Card Form Factors and Implementation.”
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The electrical connector assembly 100 of the present invention allows for an electrical connection to be made from cable members 116 to a low profile PCIe card 136. A data signal travels from cable members 116 to cable contacts 126 of cable connector 114. The data signal is transmitted from cable contacts 126 to board-mount contacts 108 of board-mount connector 102. The signal is then transmitted to attachment tabs 110 and through overmolded lead frame 120 to attachment terminals 112. Finally, the signal is transmitted from attachment terminals 112 to low profile PCIe card 136.
The present invention provides forty-eight differential pairs for connector assembly 100 by using the six board-mount connectors 102, each of which has eight differential pairs. A low-profile PCIe card with six connector allows the implementation of multidimensional network topologies that have well-known and documented benefits compared with two-dimensional topologies in terms of latency and scalability. For example, in many applications that use shared memory, the possibility of implementing 3D topology in a standard server can have significant benefits on overall performance. In addition, the use of six connectors allows the implementation of energy proportional computing topologies, like 3D torus, 6D hypercube, Flat Butterfly, and the like in standard server based cluster environments. Specifically, the present invention allows for transmission of six independent concurrent packets with a PHY interface having four lanes that is compliant with the PCIe (Gen 2/3) Specification, Inifniband SDR and DDR PHY Specification, and other protocol PHY specifications, allowing for improved scalability and reduced overall latency.
A connector assembly with only four board-mount connectors can address 4 servers or nodes with the latency of 1 hop, 12 nodes with the latency of 2 hops, 24 nodes with the latency of 3 hops, 40 nodes with the latency of 4 hops, and 60 nodes with the latency of 5 hops. On the other hand, the present invention is able to address 6 servers or nodes with the latency of a single hop, 24 nodes with the latency of 2 hops, 62 nodes with the latency of 3 hops, 128 nodes with the latency of 4 hops, and 230 nodes with the latency of 5 hops. Each additional node addressed adds latency to the operation. While a connector with only four board-mount connectors can address 60 nodes with a latency of 5 hops, the present invention is capable of handling the same number of nodes with the latency of only 3 hops. Thus, the present invention is capable of decreasing the median latency by reducing the number of hops needed to address a given number of nodes as shown in Table 1 below, or alternatively, provide more efficiency or improved scalability at the same latency.
The fact that datacenter computers rarely operate at full utilization has led to a number of proposals for creating servers that consume energy proportionally to the computations that they are performing. As servers themselves consume energy more proportionally, the datacenter network can more efficiently use cluster power (up to 50%). A datacenter network based on complex multidimensional topology, such as a 3D Torus topology, uses less hardware than a folded-Clos network of equivalent size and performance. This reduction in hardware usage itself results in a more power-efficient network and lower operating expenditures. Accordingly, networks based on complex multidimensional topology, such as a 3D Torus topology, are becoming more prevalent and utilize different protocols such as PCIe and InfiniBand.
Three-dimensional topologies, such as a 3D Torus topology, are orthogonal topologies that map the network on the standard X, Y, Z Cartesian axes. In such a topology, each server is directly connected to six other servers ideally arranged into a physical space in manner that mirrors their logical connection in the network on the standard X, Y, Z Cartesian axes. This arrangement helps to simplify the calculation and the visualization of the network structure. Each axis requires two links, one positive and one negative, and thus, each axis needs two connectors, which translates into a total of six connectors for all three axes. Therefore, a PCIe board would require a total of six connectors to implement a network with a 3D Torus topology (X−, X+, Y−, Y+, Z−, Z+). Each of these connectors must be created with an equal number of differential pairs. The present invention utilizes eight differential pairs for each link and is capable of accommodating a variety of PHY protocols, including Infiniband, 10 Gbit Ethernet PCIe networks, and HyperShare.
A connector assembly with only four connectors could not implement a network with a 3D Torus or other three-dimensional network topology. The six connectors required to implement a three-dimensional topology have traditionally been housed in full-size PCIe form-factor cards. These full-size cards do not fit into more popular low-profile, high-density servers. The present invention provides a solution to this issue with a low-profile connector assembly that contains six connectors. Therefore, the present invention allows the introduction of three-dimensional Torus networks and other similar topologies (such as flat butterfly networks) into modern datacenters, where low-profile, high-density servers are used to reduce the servers' physical square footage use.
Stated in other terms, the present invention's use of six connectors provides the ability to implement a three-dimensional grid network topology. A grid network is a type of network system comprising multiple computer systems that are connected to one another in a grid topology. Each computer system serves as a node in the grid topology. In a one-dimensional grid network, the nodes are connected in a loop or a ring. A multi-dimensional grid network is often referred to as a “torus.” A connector assembly with four connectors allows for the implementation of a grid network topology where the nodes are connected in two dimensions, and the resulting grid topology can be referred to as a two-dimensional mesh torus. Two connectors correspond to each dimension. An additional two connectors are required to implement a three-dimensional torus. The present invention provides six connectors and thus the ability to implement a three-dimensional torus. Because the present invention provides modular connectors, it can be used with the development of various new grid topologies, such as flat butterfly and hypercube networks.
The present invention provides a connector assembly that is capable of fitting six connectors (each with eight differential pairs) within the low profile PCIe standard bracket. As a result, the present invention provides the ability to use a three-dimensional torus network topology on a high-density server. Currently, other connector assemblies are unable to provide the ability to implement a three-dimensional torus topology on a high-density server. Therefore, the present invention provides improved networking benefits associated with a three-dimensional torus, including higher data transmission rate, lower latency, lower infrastructure costs, lower power consumption, lower operating costs, flexible scalability, simplified cabling, improved fault tolerance, and improved reliability.
Alternative embodiments of the invention achieve the required forty-eight differential signal pairs using different combinations of connectors and differential pairs. For example, one alternative embodiment could contain twelve connectors featuring four differential signal pairs each. As another example, an alternative embodiment could contain three connectors featuring sixteen differential pairs each. As an additional example, an alternative embodiment could contain two connectors featuring twenty-four differential pairs each. In these alternative embodiments the number of cable connectors could be adjusted to match the number of connectors present in the connector assembly.
As alluded to above, in some embodiments, a latch 118 may be provided on each cable connector 114 to help physically secure the cable connector 114 relative to a respective board-mount connector 102. In accordance with the disclosed embodiments, the latch 118 may be removed and replaced as needed, for example, for breakage or wear and tear. Referring back to
As can be seen in
As shown more clearly in
A more detailed view of an exemplary latch 118 may be seen in
As can be seen in
A latch stop 164 may be provided in some embodiments that protrudes up from the head section 158 of the latch 118. Such a latch stop 164 is designed to catch the leading edge of the latch opening 154 in the receptacle housing 150 when the cable connector 114 is connected to the board-mount connector 102, thereby preventing the latch 118, and hence the cable connector 114, from becoming inadvertently unplugged from the board-mount connector 102. In some embodiments, the latch stop 164 may be formed by partially punching a geometric shape, such as a square, circle, or the like, from the head section 158 so that only a portion (e.g., half, three quarters, etc.) of the geometric shape pokes out from the head section 158. Other shapes for the latch stop 164 may of course be used, such as the rectangular-shaped latch stop 164 shown in
As depicted in
Examples of the latch anchor 170 are illustrated in
A close or precise fit between the anchor opening 168 and the latch anchor 170 is not necessary for all implementations. In some embodiments, for example, the latch anchor 170 may have a fully extending ramp on the side proximal to the base section 160, as shown in
Referring again to
Referring still to
A fully assembled cable connector 114 and latch 118 having the features described above may be seen in
The invention has been described in the context of preferred and other embodiments and not every embodiment of the invention has been described. Obvious modifications and alterations to the described embodiments are available to those of ordinary skill in the art. The disclosed and undisclosed embodiments are not intended to limit or restrict the scope or applicability of the invention conceived of by the Applicants, but rather, in conformity with the patent laws, Applicants intend to protect fully all such modifications and improvements.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/296,166, entitled “Low-Profile Right-Angle Electrical Connector Assembly,” filed Nov. 14, 2011; and a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/296,174, entitled “Insulator with Air Dielectric Cavities for Electrical Connector,” filed Nov. 14, 2011; and a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/296,179, entitled “Electrical Connector with Wafer Having Inwardly Biasing Dovetail,” filed Nov. 14, 2011; all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4984992 | Beamenderfer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5385490 | Demeter et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
6102747 | Paagman | Aug 2000 | A |
6155887 | Cuff et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6220869 | Grant et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6273762 | Regnier | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6318632 | Grant et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361374 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6623300 | Sakurai et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6685510 | Wu | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699072 | Wu | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6699073 | Wu | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6739910 | Wu | May 2004 | B1 |
6743050 | Wu | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6780069 | Scherer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6831840 | Ruff | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6857912 | Wu | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6870746 | Leeson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877992 | Grant et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6926553 | Wu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939174 | Wu | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7021942 | Grant et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7134913 | Hasircoglu et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7187076 | Cuff et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D543508 | Dever | May 2007 | S |
D549659 | Dever | Aug 2007 | S |
7273391 | Purwin | Sep 2007 | B2 |
D560613 | McEvoy et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
D560614 | McEvoy et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
D561103 | Grant | Feb 2008 | S |
D561107 | Cuff et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D561108 | Cuff et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D561109 | Howerton et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D561110 | Howerton et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D561698 | Cuff et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D562248 | Howerton et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D562249 | Howerton et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D562775 | Cuff et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D563877 | Grant | Mar 2008 | S |
D563878 | Grant | Mar 2008 | S |
D563879 | Grant | Mar 2008 | S |
D563880 | Grant | Mar 2008 | S |
D563881 | Howerton et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D563882 | Howerton et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D563883 | Dever | Mar 2008 | S |
D563884 | Dever | Mar 2008 | S |
D563885 | Dever | Mar 2008 | S |
D563886 | Dever | Mar 2008 | S |
D563887 | Dever | Mar 2008 | S |
7364441 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7422490 | Droesbeke et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7485012 | Daugherty et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7651359 | Scherer et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7713066 | Hass | May 2010 | B2 |
7744385 | Scherer | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744414 | Scherer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7871296 | Fowler et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8210876 | Derks et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8435074 | Grant et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8449330 | Schroll et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
20020111067 | Sakurai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040110420 | Wu | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040259420 | Wu | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060105597 | Purwin | May 2006 | A1 |
20070099475 | Le et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080009191 | Van Den Heuvel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090215318 | Hass | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090233480 | Feldman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100009571 | Scherer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110294309 | Chen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130122745 | Soubh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122746 | Grant et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122755 | Smith et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130122745 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13296166 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13675955 | US | |
Parent | 13296174 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13296166 | US | |
Parent | 13296179 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13296174 | US |