The subject disclosure generally pertains to loading dock seals and more specifically to a unique support panel for such a seal.
When an exterior doorway of a building is used as a loading dock for vehicles, such as trucks and tractor/trailers, the perimeter of the doorway often includes a dock seal. Dock seals close off gaps that would otherwise exist between the exterior face of the building and the back end of the trailer. Dock seals allow cargo from the rear of the trailer to be loaded or unloaded while dockworkers and the cargo are protected from the weather. Usually two side seals run vertically along the lateral edges of the doorway, and a top or head seal runs horizontally along the doorway's upper edge; however, additional seals can also be used.
A typical dock seal comprises a resiliently compressible foam core supported by a rigid backer, such as a wood plank or a formed metal plate. The foam core and backer are normally encased within a fabric outer cover. Sealing is provided by backing the trailer up against the seal so that the seal compressively conforms to the rear shape of the trailer. The foam core provides the necessary compliance and resilience to repeatedly conform to the shape of various trailers; the outer cover protects the foam core from dirt, water and wear; and the backer provides solid structure for mounting the seal to the wall and for supporting the foam core so that the foam core does not twist and roll within the fabric cover.
Due to the trailer's wheel suspension, adding or removing cargo and/or driving a forklift on and off the trailer bed can cause the rear of the trailer to repeatedly rise and lower a few inches. Although the incidental movement can be a problem, most dock seals are sufficiently wear resistant to tolerate such movement.
A more serious problem, however, can occur after a tractor backs its trailer up against the dock seal, and the trailer is subsequently unhitched from the tractor while the trailer is still up against the seal. The front end of the unhitched trailer might then be set back down on the trailer's landing gear or temporarily rehitched onto a special tractor (yard jockey or yard mule) designated specifically for shuffling trailers around the loading dock area. Hitching and unhitching the front end of the trailer can cause the entire trailer to tilt about its rear wheels. The resulting seesaw action produces substantial up and down movement at the rear end of the trailer, which can cut and abrade the dock seal.
Moreover, when the front end of the trailer is raised, which tilts the rear end of the trailer downward, the upper rear edge of the trailer can dig deeply into the dock's head seal. When the front end of the trailer is subsequently lowered, the trailer's rear edge can pry the head seal upward.
In some cases, the trailer's rear edge digs into the seal so deeply that the edge catches the seal's backer and pries the head seal off the wall. This particularly tends to happen with relatively thick backers that are made intentionally thick to provide the foam core with ample support. If the backer is too thin, however, or omitted entirely in order to prevent the trailer's rear edge from catching the backer, the foam core may tend to roll and twist within the outer fabric cover. Thus, it can be difficult to design a backer with a thickness that addresses both problems.
When vehicle 10 is backed up against dock seal 20, as shown in
It is not unusual for vehicle 10 to press its rear edges 26 and 28 tightly against dock seal 20. If these edges subsequently move up and down due to vehicle 10 being loaded and unloaded of cargo, or the vehicle's trailer tilts due to the front end of the trailer being hitched or unhitched, then the trailers' rear edges 26 and 28 might dig deeply into seal 20. In some cases, the vehicle's upper rear edge 26 might pry head seal 22 upward from its position of
With a yard jockey, a typical operating sequence would be: 1) a yard jockey lifting the front end of the trailer (thus lowering the trailer's rear edge); 2) the yard jockey forcing the trailer's upper rear edge deeply into the dock's head seal (
To prevent damaging seal 20 under such conditions, head seal 22, lateral seals 24, and/or lower seal 32 can be of a construction that tolerates extreme compression, translation, rotation and/or distortion. This can be accomplished by supporting dock seal 20 with something other than a conventional backer; which is usually relatively thick and consumes volume that could otherwise be used for resilient compression and distortion. If a conventional backer of standard thickness were used to support the compressible portion of the seal, there is less room available for compression. In some cases, the support member is fastened to wall 16 with structure that allows some relative movement between seal 20 and wall 16. Although an example will be described with reference to head seal 22, the same seal design may also apply to lateral seals 24 and perhaps lower seal 32.
Referring to
Although the actual design of head seal 22 may vary, in a current example, support panel 44 is sandwiched between compressible bodies 40 and 42. Referring to
Even though it is conceivable and well within the scope of the disclosure to bond or otherwise attach support panel 44 directly to compressible body 40 and omit compressible body 42, such a design does not work quite as well as having support panel 44 interposed between two bondable bodies. If compressible body 40 is not firmly attached to support panel 44 (due to body 42 being omitted, due to the support panel being too pliable, and/or due to panel 44 and body 40 being of different materials that are not readily bonded by a common adhesive), compressible body 40 might move relative to panel 44 and roll within cover 38. With the addition of compressible body 42, it has been found that bodies 40 and 42, being of a similar material, can be readily bonded to each other to firmly capture support panel 44.
In a current example, compressible bodies 40 and 42 are made of a class L24 open-cell polyurethane foam; however, other foams and compressible or collapsible structures are well within the scope of the disclosure. Cover 38 can be any appropriate material including, but not be limited to, HYPALON, canvas duck, rubber impregnated fabric and coated nylon fabric. Support panel 44 can be made of metal, plastic or some other material that is substantially thinner and denser than front compressible body 36.
To mount head seal 22 to wall 16, any suitable fastener 54 can be used to fasten support panel 44 directly to the face of wall 16 or used to fasten support panel 44 to one or more flexible panels 56, which in turn are mounted to wall 16 via another fastener 58. When vehicle 10 pries upward against seal 22, as shown in
To maximize the compressibility of head seal 22, support panel 44 is much thinner than front compressible body 40. When in the relaxed state of
Also, head seal 22 may have a density ratio of less than 3%, wherein the density ratio is defined as density of front compressible body 40 divided by the material density of support panel 44. Even better results are achieved when the density ratio is less than 1%. For an optimum combination of the projection ratio and the density ratio, the density ratio is may be less than the projection ratio. For a current example, compressible projection 64 is about 8 to 23 inches, panel projection 66 is about ⅛ inch, front body 40 has a density of about 1.5 pounds per cubic foot (24 kg/m3), and support panel 44 has a material density of about 480 pounds per cubic foot when made of steel or about 58 pounds per cubic foot when made of HMW polyethylene.
To facilitate manufacturability, a slightly modified head seal 72 can be made as shown in
In other embodiments, shown in
In this particular example, each mechanism 106 includes a generally rectangular frame 108 (or some other suitable shape) with a generally U-shaped brace 110. The actual shapes of frame 108 and brace 110 may vary. Rotatable couplings 112 pivotally connect both legs of brace 110 to intermediate points on frame 108. A central section 114 of brace 110 can pivotally rotate within one or more anchors 116 that are fixed relative to wall 16. Frame 108 includes a section 118 that can both slide and pivot within a slot 120 defined by a track member 122. The pivotal connections at anchors 116 and couplings 112, and the combination pivotal/sliding connection at slot 120 allow frame 108 and brace 110 to move between the positions shown in
To help hold cover 104 taut, an elastic member 124 held in tension pulls an outer edge 126 of each frame 106 towards each other. Examples of elastic member 124 include, but are not limited to, a latex tube, a neoprene cord, helical spring, elastic strap, and the like. Elastic member 124 can be attached to frame 108 in any suitable manner. A similar elastic member 128 can be used for holding cover 104 to support panel 98, while a peripheral lip 130 on cover 104 can provide sealing between wall 16 and dock seal 94.
In some cases, elastic member 124 can be used for urging the dock seal to its expanded position. In other cases, however, where edge 126 moves in a generally linear motion between its positions of
Even though various head seals and lateral seal have been shown as generally straight elongate members, it is well within the scope of the disclosure to provide similarly constructed dock seals of other shapes and designs. Instead of one long member, for instance, head seals 22 and 76 can be comprised of two or more shorter segments that are mounted end-to-end to create an elongate seal assembly of a desired length.
In other cases, as shown in
As an alternative to the embodiment of
Some of the aforementioned examples may include one or more features and/or benefits including, but not limited to, the following:
Some example dock seals comprise a compressible body reinforced by an ultra-thin support panel.
In some examples, a thickness of a support panel is less than approximately 2% of a compressible body's thickness.
In some examples, a thickness of a support panel is between about 0.5-1.5% of a compressible body's thickness.
In some examples, a support panel is a substantially flat piece rather than a formed sheet metal pan with flanges. As a flat piece, the support panel's material thickness is substantially equal to its panel projection, which maximizes the compressible projection of the dock seal.
In some examples, a flexible panel couples a dock seal and a support panel to a wall such that the flexible panel allows the seal and the support panel to move relative to the wall, wherein the movement is in a direction that is generally perpendicular to the seal's length.
In some examples, a support panel is embedded within a compressible body so that the support panel can be readily bonded in place.
In some examples, a dock seal includes a front compressible body for sealing against a vehicle and a rear compressible body for sealing against a building wall.
In some examples, the compressible body of a dock seal comprises a collapsible frame supporting a pliable cover.
In some examples, a support panel of a compressible body includes a series of holes that facilitates bonding the panel in place.
In some examples, a dock seal includes a front compressible body for sealing against a vehicle, a rear compressible body for sealing against a building wall, and an intermediate compressible body that helps in bonding a support panel and the rear compressible body to the front compressible body.
In some examples, the dock seal includes a compressible body and a support panel, wherein the relative densities and relative projections of the body and the panel are within a specific novel range such that the dock seal is particularly tolerant of deep gouging and prying by a vehicle pressing up against the seal.
Although the invention is described with respect to various examples, modifications thereto will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The scope of the invention, therefore, is to be determined by reference to the following claims:
This patent arises as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/557,351, filed Nov. 7, 2006, entitled “Low Profile Support Panel for a Dock Seal,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
615174 | Hettrick | Nov 1898 | A |
688595 | Coe | Dec 1901 | A |
1008491 | Pruden | Nov 1911 | A |
1587134 | Anton | Jun 1926 | A |
2565393 | Oswald | Aug 1951 | A |
2576692 | Smith | Nov 1951 | A |
2627912 | Soppeland | Feb 1953 | A |
2704574 | Etlar | Mar 1955 | A |
2764236 | Dye | Sep 1956 | A |
2892463 | Frommelt et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
2898983 | Etten | Aug 1959 | A |
3095886 | Frommelt et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3181205 | Frommelt et al. | May 1965 | A |
3195953 | Zacks | Jul 1965 | A |
3216433 | D'Azzo | Nov 1965 | A |
3230675 | Frommelt et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3299570 | Radcliffe | Jan 1967 | A |
3322132 | Rieder et al. | May 1967 | A |
3352314 | Frommelt et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3375625 | Edkins et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3391503 | O'Neal | Jul 1968 | A |
3403489 | Frommelt et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3415026 | Tillisch et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3493984 | Reinhard | Feb 1970 | A |
3500599 | Sciolino | Mar 1970 | A |
3528086 | Conger | Sep 1970 | A |
3538655 | Frommelt et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3557508 | Frommelt et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3613324 | Conger | Oct 1971 | A |
3638667 | Frommelt et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3644952 | Hatch | Feb 1972 | A |
3653155 | de Brunyn, Jr. et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3653173 | Frommelt et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3665997 | Smith et al. | May 1972 | A |
3683572 | Alten | Aug 1972 | A |
3699733 | Frommelt et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3714745 | O'Neal | Feb 1973 | A |
3772839 | Timbers | Nov 1973 | A |
3792559 | Frommelt et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3826049 | Frommelt et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3834400 | Sattler | Sep 1974 | A |
3854257 | Lobel | Dec 1974 | A |
RE28391 | Frommelt et al. | Apr 1975 | E |
3875954 | Frommelt et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3915183 | Frommelt | Oct 1975 | A |
3934380 | Frommelt et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3935684 | Frommelt et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3939614 | Frommelt et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3994103 | Ouellet | Nov 1976 | A |
4015380 | Chalfant | Apr 1977 | A |
4038792 | McGuire et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4062157 | Potthoff | Dec 1977 | A |
4070801 | O'Neal | Jan 1978 | A |
4112958 | Anderberg | Sep 1978 | A |
4213279 | Layne | Jul 1980 | A |
4262458 | O'Neal | Apr 1981 | A |
4381631 | Frommelt | May 1983 | A |
4389821 | O'Neal | Jun 1983 | A |
4494341 | Schwab | Jan 1985 | A |
4495737 | Alten | Jan 1985 | A |
4554768 | Srajer | Nov 1985 | A |
4571903 | Strassner | Feb 1986 | A |
4574542 | Kleynjans | Mar 1986 | A |
4601142 | Frommelt | Jul 1986 | A |
4636423 | Reid | Jan 1987 | A |
4638612 | Bennett | Jan 1987 | A |
4679364 | Fettig et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4682382 | Bennett | Jul 1987 | A |
4686806 | Bennett | Aug 1987 | A |
4711059 | Layne | Dec 1987 | A |
4712339 | Wenham et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4718207 | Frommelt et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4724648 | Diepholder | Feb 1988 | A |
4750299 | Frommelt et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4785594 | Alten | Nov 1988 | A |
4799341 | Frommelt et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4799342 | Klevnjans | Jan 1989 | A |
4800618 | Putz | Jan 1989 | A |
4800619 | Hudak | Jan 1989 | A |
4805362 | Frommelt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4815490 | Soderstrom | Mar 1989 | A |
4821468 | Moore | Apr 1989 | A |
4825606 | Alten | May 1989 | A |
4825607 | Frommelt et al. | May 1989 | A |
4855567 | Mueller | Aug 1989 | A |
4873800 | Frommelt et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4873801 | Winters | Oct 1989 | A |
4877288 | Lee | Oct 1989 | A |
4916870 | Moore | Apr 1990 | A |
4922658 | Coddens | May 1990 | A |
5007211 | Ouellet | Apr 1991 | A |
5016391 | Miller et al. | May 1991 | A |
5055335 | Wicks | Oct 1991 | A |
5125196 | Moody | Jun 1992 | A |
5174075 | Alten | Dec 1992 | A |
5185977 | Brockman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195285 | Alten | Mar 1993 | A |
5282342 | Brockman et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5473846 | Giuliani et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5501508 | Llewellyn | Mar 1996 | A |
5538323 | Henkel | Jul 1996 | A |
5553424 | Brockman et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5608996 | Brockman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5622016 | Frommelt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5644812 | Neufeldt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651155 | Hodges et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658633 | Di Biase | Aug 1997 | A |
5669665 | Nowak | Sep 1997 | A |
5675945 | Giuliani et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5775044 | Styba et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794678 | Beringer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5881414 | Alexander | Mar 1999 | A |
5927025 | Brockman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5953868 | Giuliani et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5996291 | Styba et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6123136 | Williams | Sep 2000 | A |
6170205 | Styba | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205721 | Ashelin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233885 | Hoffmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6279641 | Malott | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6374554 | Eungard | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425214 | Boffeli et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6550191 | Hoffmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7185463 | Borgerding | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7383644 | Lyu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20010018813 | Ashelin et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030140579 | Hoffmann et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040075223 | Eungard | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050010890 | Nehmadi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050102929 | Hoffmann et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108961 | Chalfant | May 2005 | A1 |
20080104902 | Ashelin et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
600117 | Jun 1978 | CH |
2239483 | Feb 1974 | DE |
2436518 | Aug 1975 | DE |
3130657 | Feb 1983 | DE |
4128168 | Mar 1993 | DE |
4317054 | Nov 1994 | DE |
29600207 | Feb 1996 | DE |
29804117 | May 1998 | DE |
0186093 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0205648 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0379634 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0493713 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0602501 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0641731 | Mar 1995 | EP |
2686913 | Aug 1993 | FR |
0004194 | Jan 1907 | GB |
1509935 | May 1978 | GB |
2312915 | Nov 1997 | GB |
9943583 | Sep 1999 | WO |
02070382 | Sep 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
State Intellectual Property Office of China, “First Office Action,” issued in connection with Chinese application serial No. 2007800412211, issued Jul. 6, 2011, 6 pages. |
Rite-Hite Holding Corporation, “Rain Diverter Curtain,” Blueprint No. D802-0176, Model No. Wg402, Jul. 1, 1992, 1 page. |
Frommelt Industries, Inc., “VHL Vertically-Movable Bottom Pad Detail,” Blueprint Nos. 692-0125 and 692-0126, Oct. 7, 1988, 2 pages. |
Frommelt Industries, Inc., “VHL Vertically-Moving Bottom Pad,” Drawing No. 692-0029, Oct. 17, 1985, 1 page. |
Rite-Hite Holding Corporation, “Split-Cornered C-Curtain,” Drawing No. A 204-0029, May 27, 1994, 1 page. |
Kinnear, Loading Dock Seal, Brochure, 1978, 4 pages. |
Kinnear, “Dock Seal,” Installation Instructions, 1978, 5 pages. |
Super Seal Mtg. Ltd., “Super Seal Dock Seals,” Catalog 11160/SU, Aug. 29, 1989, 8 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian application serial No. 2,669,048, issued May 20, 2011, 3 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with Canadian application serial No. 2,669,048, issued May 17, 2010, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Office Communication,” issued in connection with application serial No. 07 853 733.9, issued Aug. 4, 2010, 5 pages. |
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2007/080210, issued May 12, 2009, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2007/080210, issued Jan. 14, 2009, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2007/080210, issued Jan. 14, 2009, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, “Partial Search Report,” issued in connection with international application serial No. PCT/US2007/080210, issued Feb. 28, 2008, 3 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,351, issued Jan. 28, 2011, 23 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,351, issued Jun. 8, 2010, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,351, issued Jan. 15, 2010, 8 pages. |
Mexican Patent Office, “Examination Report,” issued in connection with Mexican application serial No. MX/a/2009/004836, issued Feb. 22, 2012, 2 pages. |
Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, “Second Office Action,” with English translation, issued in connection with Chinese application serial No. 200780041221.1, issued May 16, 2012, 6 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Decision to Grant,” issued in connection with European application serial No. 07853733.9, mailed Jun. 1, 2012, 1 page. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action,” issued in connection with application serial No. 2,669,048, issued Apr. 16, 2012, 3 pages. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” issued in connection with application serial No. 12004779.0, issued Sep. 5, 2012, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110265400 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11557351 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 13178257 | US |