A magnetic recording medium stores data as regions of alternating magnetic orientation. In a hard disk drive, for example, data is written in circular tracks that include sequential changes in the direction of magnetization. The amount of data stored on a hard disk is generally determined by the areal density multiplied by the surface area of the magnetic disks available for data storage. Currently, hard disks come in a few standard form factors, and increases in total drive storage capacity have been made possible by continually increasing areal density of the magnetic disks.
The present disclosure is related to magnetic write pole with low-recess coil near a shield at a media-facing surface. In one embodiment, an apparatus includes a write pole magnetically coupled to write coils that generate a first magnetic field during a switching event. The apparatus includes a shield at a media-facing surface and proximate the write pole. A conductive element is disposed proximate the shield and configured to generate a second magnetic field opposite to the first magnetic field during the switching event. A selected one of the write coils is located adjacent the shield separate from others of the write coils.
In another embodiment, a method involves sending a current to first coils of a write pole and also sending the current to a low-recess coil of the write pole. The low-recess coil is adjacent a shield at a media-facing surface and separate from first coils. The current generates a first magnetic field at the media-facing surface during a switching event. The method also involves generating a second magnetic field opposite to the first magnetic field at a shield during the switching event.
These and other features and aspects of various embodiments may be understood in view of the following detailed discussion and accompanying drawings.
In the following diagrams, the same reference numbers may be used to identify similar/same/analogous components in multiple figures. The figures are not necessarily to scale.
The present disclosure is generally related to an apparatus (e.g., a magnetic read/write head) having a magnetically activated shield that enhances a dynamic gradient of magnetic flux applied to a media via a write pole. Generally, the shield is activated by sending current to a wire (hereinafter referred to as “shield wire”) that is placed inside or on top of the front shield. The current runs in the direction opposite to that of main coils that energize the write pole, the shield being energized at the same time or nearly so as the main coils. During switching of magnetic orientation, the shield wire magnetizes the front shield in the direction opposite to that of the main pole, enhancing the gradient during the transition.
It is usually expected that the main pole magnetizes the shields and therefore potential difference between the main pole and shields (and the resulting gradient) always lags. In certain cases the shield response lags behind the main pole dynamics, in which case dynamic front shield saturation is also observed and the front shield aligns in the same direction as the write pole during switching. If the shields are activated directly by shield wires, the gradient is enhanced before the main pole is fully magnetized (e.g., just when it starts to write to the media). In such a case, improved performance can be achieved, resulting in, increased areal data density. The shield wire also intended to prevent dynamic front shield saturation. There is evidence that design modifications consistent with larger field/gradient (e.g., large top bevel, sloped front shield, etc.) run a risk of increasing saturation of the shield, so that future implementation of this mitigation is warranted.
The physics of using the shield wire to improve the dynamic gradient has been verified experimentally. However, it was also found that the design may benefit from further changes. For example, additional wires in the shield area directly impact the write pole, reducing the magnetomotive force (MMF) the write pole experiences. The shield wire is located very close to pole at the media-facing surface, and in some cases slows down the write pole dynamic performance. Encasing significant portion of the wire in the front shield was meant to prevent such behavior.
Experiments have established, however, that even without any current applied to the write pole, the shield wire by itself is capable of writing through activating the write pole. Unexpectedly, even at relatively high wire currents, there was no clear evidence of front shield erasure. One of the possible explanations for this is that all but a central 0.7 um portion of the wire is located outside the front shield. However, the modeling seems to indicate that while this effect is substantial, it by no means dominating.
Even in configurations where the shield wire is completely inserted in the front shield, it appears that even a small current (10 mA or so) is enough to almost completely saturate a portion of the front shield. After that the wire field leaks directly into the write pole. Even though relative efficiency of such shield wire is smaller than even that of a single coil turn, it is enough to force operation at very high currents and overshoots, especially for high data rate performance, where rise time is important.
On the other hand, a number of solutions that allow greatly reduce rise time and improve the writer performance are associated with a substantially higher risk of front shield saturation and erasure. One efficient solution involves putting one of the writer coils (hereinafter also referred to as a “low-recess coil”) close to the media-facing surface, e.g., within 1 μm. The low recess coil can be combined with a direct activation of the front shield by the shield wire, directly compensating for the latter's negative impact on write pole dynamics and efficiency.
The low-recess coil can be located on the leading or trailing edge of the writer. In order to be more efficient in driving the write pole than the wire, the low-recess coil may be located very close to the write pole at the media-facing surface. In order to not disturb the positive effect the shield wire field has on the front shield, the low-recess coil may be to be thin. The number of writer coils may be unbalanced on leading versus trailing sides to optimal writing angle, which also takes account the presence of the shield wire.
In reference now to
A control circuit 112 is coupled to the write transducer 108. The control circuit 112 provides a signal that causes changes in a magnetic field of a write coil of the write transducer 108. The changing magnetic field results in local changes in magnetic orientation of the magnetic disk 111 as the disk 111 moves underneath the slider 102, as indicated by arrow 114. The arrow 114 generally indicates a down track direction of the slider. A direction normal to the page (x-axis) is a cross track direction, and the slider 102 is moved in the cross track direction by the arm 104 when seeking to different tracks.
The control circuit 112 may also send a current to a shield wire. This shield current may be in an opposite direction as the current sent to the write coils, which will induce a magnetic field that has an opposite orientation to that of the write coil. As will be described in greater detail below, the control circuit 112 (or other circuits) may cause a delay between transitions of the write coil current and the shield current. These delays may help increase write field during steady-state operations, while still enhancing magnetic gradient during transitions.
In reference now to
As previously noted above, a conductive element, e.g., shield wire 208, is located within or nearby to the front shield 204. During operation, the shield wire 208 is energized to create a magnetic field that is opposite of a magnetic field generated by the write pole 202. This may be done, for example, by running a current through the wire 208 in a direction opposite to that of the main write coil that magnetizes the write pole 202. By synchronizing opposing currents in this way, the front shield 204 can more quickly close the magnetic flux circuit during transitions and establish a sharper gradient. A similar effect may be induced by including shield wires 210 in one or more of the side shields 206, either instead of or in addition to the front shield wire 208.
As mentioned above, it has been found that the front shield wire 208 may magnetize the write pole 202 even at low currents through the shield wire 208. To prevent this magnetization, a selected one of the coil wires 212 is placed near the media-facing surface 103. As will be shown in other views, the selected coil wire 212 may be spaced apart (e.g., recessed) from the media-facing surface 103 so that it is near a top surface of the front shield 204. In this case, a “top” surface is a surface facing away from the media-facing surface 103. Based on this convention, the bottom the front shield 204 is the one visible in the plan view of
In
The low-recess coil wire 212 is part of the coil 302, in that it induces the same magnetic field for a given current flow direction as the other coil wires 302a, 302b. The low-recess coil wire 212 may be directly electrically coupled to one or more of the wires 302a, 302b so that the current sent to the coils wires 302a, 302b also flows through the low-recess coil wire 212.
The coils wires 212, 302a, 302b surround a yoke 304 through which magnetic flux moves. The flux is directed to a front return pole 306 and a rear return pole 308, as well as the write pole 202. Generally, the media 111 has a structure that facilitates perpendicular orientation of recorded bits. The orientation of the write pole 202 and return poles 306, 308 cause the magnetic lines of flux to be oriented perpendicular to the recording surface when the coil 302 is energized.
In the embodiment shown in
It should be noted that a number of coils 302a, 212 on one side of the write pole 202 is different than a number of coils 302b another side of the write pole 202. This asymmetry may be a used to shape/influence the magnetic field of the write pole 202 in a leading or trailing direction. While this and other embodiments show a different number of coils on opposite sides of the write pole, it will be understood that the number of coils on either side of the write pole may be the same. For example, in
An alternate configuration of a write transponder according to an example embodiment is shown in the cross sectional view of
In
The embodiments as shown in
In the configuration of
Overall, any of the configurations shown above are capable of improving high data rate performance at moderate currents, while offering a boost to the dynamic gradient. Further, it will be understood that any of these configurations may be used with a trailing shield (not shown) or side shields (see
In reference now to
Curve 706 represents a current that drives the shield (e.g., front shield) in a non-delayed configuration. The curve 706 transitions between polarities during the transition period 704, causing a second magnetic field transition to occur at the shield. Because the polarity of curve 706 is opposite that of curve 702, the second magnetic field transition is opposite to the first magnetic field transition. Generally, the switching event in this example includes just the transition period 704, allowing for some tolerance within the indicated range due to drift, settling, etc.
As an alternate, the shield wire current may be delayed while being applied with the same polarity current as the main coil, as indicated by curve 708. The delayed curve 708 transitions after the transition period 704. In this case the coil current (and consequently front shield magnetization) is opposite to that of the main coil and the write pole during only a part of the switching event, e.g., when the gradient is established. At other times (e.g., steady-state), the front shield magnetization has the same polarity as that of the main coil, significantly boosting the write field. The switching event in the delayed case includes both the transition period 704 and a short delay period 710 right after the transition where both first and second magnetic fields of the coil and shield are anti-aligned. In this example, the delay period 710 is about 100-250 ps, roughly comparable to the transition period 704.
It appears that large gradient of the write field is mostly important during the early part of the transition period 704, before the write pole reaches the saturation point. At other times, the front shield magnetic field mostly reduces the write field. This suggests the scheme shown by the delayed current curve 708, in which write pole and front shield are switched at different times.
In
For the delayed case in block 813, the coil and shield magnetic fields are reversed during switching. This much the same as the non-delayed case shown in block 812. However, for the delayed case at steady-state (as shown in block 811), the front shield 804 is magnetized in the same direction as the write pole 802. This alignment between coil and shield magnetic fields results in a larger write field during steady-state, and also affects the write angle.
In reference now to
The first and second magnetic fields may be generally opposite during device operation (e.g., non-delayed configuration), or aligned except during the transition period (e.g., delayed configuration). In the latter case, the alignment of the first and second magnetic fields influences a steady-state write angle of the write pole. An apparatus may be configured to utilize either or both of a delayed and non-deleted configuration. For example, the apparatus may include a controller that can be set to either configuration during manufacture, and/or may be able to switch configurations dynamically, e.g., during runtime. An example method of how magnetic fields are driven based on a delayed or non-delayed configuration is shown in the flowchart of
A determination 1000 is made as to whether a signal is sent to a shield is aligned but delayed from a write coil signal, or opposite the write coil signal. In the latter case, the magnetic field of the shield is driven 1002 in an opposite direction to that of the write pole. In the former, delayed case, the magnetic field of the shield is driven 1002 in an opposite direction to that of the write pole only during switching (or at least part of a switching period/event), as shown by decision block 1004. Otherwise (e.g., during steady-state), the magnetic field of the shield is driven 1006 so as to be aligned with magnetic field of the write pole.
The various embodiments described above may be implemented using circuitry and/or software modules that interact to provide particular results. One of skill in the computing arts can readily implement such described functionality, either at a modular level or as a whole, using knowledge generally known in the art. For example, the flowcharts illustrated herein may be used to create computer-readable instructions/code for execution by a processor. Such instructions may be stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium and transferred to the processor for execution as is known in the art. The structures and procedures shown above are only a representative example of embodiments that can be used to facilitate managing caching in data storage devices as described above.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing feature sizes, amounts, and physical properties used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the foregoing specification and attached claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by those skilled in the art utilizing the teachings disclosed herein. The use of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers within that range (e.g. 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 2, 2.75, 3, 3.80, 4, and 5) and any range within that range.
The foregoing description of the example embodiments has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the inventive concepts to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. Any or all features of the disclosed embodiments can be applied individually or in any combination are not meant to be limiting, but purely illustrative. It is intended that the scope be limited not with this detailed description, but rather determined by the claims appended hereto.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/365,942, filed Feb. 3, 2012, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6178070 | Hong et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
7099121 | Parker et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7149055 | Clinton et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7212367 | Clinton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7362530 | Hashizume | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7372665 | Stoev et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7440213 | Amin et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7468862 | Sasaki et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7679863 | Hashimoto et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7808746 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7862912 | Hellwig et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7869309 | Mihalcea et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8077417 | Mallary et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8107180 | Nishida et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8289821 | Huber | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8363346 | Taguchi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20040169950 | Clinton et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050280935 | Clinton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289577 | Seigler et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060119982 | Honjo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132971 | Clinton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060176601 | Amin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070036040 | Mihalcea et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080088972 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112087 | Clinton et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090128941 | Taratorin | May 2009 | A1 |
20090158305 | Seigler et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090226762 | Hellwig et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237837 | Amin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100149675 | Mallary et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110030109 | Saito | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110242694 | Taguchi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120051196 | Grobis et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120229932 | Sasaki et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120314325 | Wessel et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327529 | Hutchinson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,942, filed Feb. 3, 2012, Lopusnik et al. |
Aug. 7, 2013, File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,942 as retrieved from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Aug. 7, 2013, 96 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130321955 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13365942 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 13961672 | US |