Not Applicable
In various environments where one uses protective eyewear such as goggles, visors, and face shields, it is important to maintain visibility as debris accumulates on the eyewear. For example, participants in off-road sports like motocross racing need to maintain visibility of the course as mud, bugs, and other debris accumulate on their goggles or helmet visor. Similarly, in an operating room environment, splatter can impair the view of surgeons or other operating personnel during a procedure. In response to these needs, tearoff films are commonly employed, either individually or in laminated stacks, which are applied to the goggle lens, visor, or face shield. As debris accumulates on the outermost tearoff film or the outermost tearoff film becomes damaged, the wearer simply tears it off to reveal the next pristine film underneath.
In order to ensure visual acuity through such stacked lenses, it is desirable to minimize internal reflection. One promising technology for reducing reflection is so-called moth-eye (ME) coatings, which simulate the anti-reflective properties of a moth's eye by providing a pattern of microscopic bumps that effectively eliminate the index of refraction interface between the lens and the air. Unfortunately, in the case of a stack of lenses, the adhesives used between the layers have a tendency to fill in around the bumps of the ME coating, drastically increasing the peel strength of each layer (making it 650 to 1,070 grams/inch, for example) and thus making the stack unusable as the layers cannot easily be torn off and the force to remove a layer may be greater than the tensile strength of the lens material.
The present disclosure contemplates various devices and methods for overcoming the drawbacks accompanying the related art. One aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack. The removable lens stack may comprise a base layer including a substrate having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, the base layer further including a moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate. The removable lens stack may further comprise one or more removable lens layers, each removable lens layer including a substrate having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, a moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate, and a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate. The one or more removable lens layers may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of each removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of an immediately preceding layer from among the base layer and the one or more removable lens layers. Each of the fluoropolymer coatings may be molded to fit the moth eye coating of the immediately preceding layer.
In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the moth eye coating may comprise a polymer.
In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the moth eye coating may define a pattern of bumps with half-wave pitch.
In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the moth eye coating may define a pattern of bumps with half-wave height.
In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the moth eye coating may define a pattern of cones.
The base layer may further include a moth eye coating on the second side of the substrate.
In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the substrate may comprise polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
The removable lens stack may comprise, in each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, an adhesion treatment between the substrate and the moth eye coating. The adhesion treatment may comprise a pressure sensitive adhesive.
The removable lens stack may comprise, in each of the one or more removable lens layers, an adhesion treatment between the substrate and the fluoropolymer coating. The adhesion treatment may comprise a pressure sensitive adhesive.
A peel strength of each of the one or more removable lens layers may be less than 100 grams per inch. A peel strength of each of the one or more removable lens layers may be between 15 and 50 grams per inch and may, more particularly, be between 15 and 30 grams per inch.
A visible light transmission (VLT) of the removable lens stack may be greater than 95% and may, more particularly, be greater than 98%.
Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a method of manufacturing a removable lens stack. The method may comprise providing a base layer including a substrate having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, the base layer further including a moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate. The method may further comprise stacking one or more removable lens layers on top of the base layer, each removable lens layer including a substrate having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, a moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate, and a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate. The one or more removable lens layers may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of each removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of an immediately preceding layer from among the base layer and the one or more removable lens layers. The method may further comprise laminating the stacked one or more removable lens layers to the base layer, each of the fluoropolymer coatings being molded to fit the moth eye coating of the immediately preceding layer.
The laminating may comprise laminating the stacked one or more removable lens layers to the base layer under pressure at a temperature less than 40° C.
The method may comprise, in each of the one or more removable lens layers, applying a corona treatment between the substrate and the moth eye coating.
The method may comprise, in each of the one or more removable lens layers, applying a corona treatment between the substrate and the fluoropolymer coating.
Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack comprising a base layer, a first removable lens layer, and a second removable lens layer. The base layer may include a substrate and a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate. The first removable lens layer may include a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and a fluoropolymer coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating. The second removable lens layer may include a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The second removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.
The moth eye coating may comprise a polymer. The moth eye coating may define a pattern of bumps with half-wave pitch. The moth eye coating may define a pattern of bumps with half-wave height. The moth eye coating may define a pattern of cones.
The base layer may include a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side.
In each of the base layer, the first removable lens layer, and the second removable lens layer, the substrate may comprise polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
The removable lens stack may further comprise a third removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The third removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the second removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the third removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer. The removable lens stack may further comprise a fourth removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The fourth layer may be stacked on top of the third removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the fourth removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the third removable lens layer.
A peel strength of the first removable lens layer may be less than 100 grams per inch. The peel strength of the first removable lens layer may be between 15 and 50 grams per inch. The peel strength of the first removable lens layer may be between 15 and 30 grams per inch.
A visible light transmission (VLT) of the removable lens stack may be greater than 95%. The VLT of the removable lens stack may be greater than 98%.
Another aspect of the present disclosure is a method of manufacturing a removable lens stack. The method may comprise providing a base layer including a substrate and a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate and stacking a first removable lens layer on top of the base layer, the first removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and a fluoropolymer coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The method may further comprise laminating the stacked first removable lens layer to the base layer, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating. The method may further comprise stacking a second removable lens layer on top of the first removable lens layer, the second removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.
The laminating may comprise laminating the stacked first removable lens layer to the base layer under pressure at a temperature less than 40° C. The laminating may be performed prior to the stacking of the second removable lens layer on top of the first removable lens layer.
The method may further comprise applying a corona treatment between the substrate and the moth eye coating of the base layer and/or between the substrate and the fluoropolymer coating of the first removable lens layer.
The method may further comprise stacking a third removable lens layer on top of the second removable lens layer, the third removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The third removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the second removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the third removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer. The method may further comprise stacking a fourth removable lens layer on top of the third removable lens layer, the fourth removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The fourth removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the third removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the fourth removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the third removable lens layer.
Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack comprising a base layer, a first removable lens layer, and a second removable lens layer. The base layer may include a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may include a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The second removable lens layer may include a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.
The acrylic coating of each of the first and second removable lens layers may comprise an acrylic hard coat. The acrylic hard coat may contain silica beads. The first removable lens layer may include a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The second removable lens layer may include an acrylic adhesive on the second side of the substrate. The second removable lens layer may include a polyurethane adhesive on the second side of the substrate.
Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack comprising a base layer and a first removable lens layer. The base layer may include a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may include a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer.
The acrylic coating may comprise an acrylic hard coat. The acrylic hard coat may contain silica beads. The first removable lens layer may include a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The removable lens stack may comprise a second removable lens layer including a substrate, an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer. The removable lens stack may comprise a second removable lens layer including a substrate, an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, and a polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.
Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack comprising a base layer and a first removable lens layer. The base layer may include a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may include a substrate and a fluoropolymer coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer.
The fluoropolymer coating of the first removable lens layer may comprise a fluoropolymer hard coat. The fluoropolymer hard coat may contain silica beads. The first removable lens layer may include a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The removable lens stack may comprise a second removable lens layer including a substrate and a fluoropolymer coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer. The second removable lens layer may include an acrylic adhesive on the second side of the substrate. The second removable lens layer may include a polyurethane adhesive on the second side of the substrate. The fluoropolymer coating of the second removable lens layer may comprise a fluoropolymer hard coat.
These and other features and advantages of the various embodiments disclosed herein will be better understood with respect to the following description and drawings, in which like numbers refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
The present disclosure encompasses various embodiments of removable lens stacks and manufacturing methods thereof. The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of several currently contemplated embodiments and is not intended to represent the only form in which the disclosed invention may be developed or utilized. The description sets forth the functions and features in connection with the illustrated embodiments. It is to be understood, however, that the same or equivalent functions may be accomplished by different embodiments that are also intended to be encompassed within the scope of the present disclosure. It is further understood that the use of relational terms such as first and second and the like are used solely to distinguish one from another entity without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities.
Unlike conventional removable lenses, each removable lens layer 200 may additionally comprise a fluoropolymer coating 230 on a second side 214 of the substrate 210 opposite the first side 212. As such, when the removable lens layer(s) 200 are stacked on top of the base layer 100 with the second side 214 of each substrate 210 facing the first side 112, 212 of the immediately preceding substrate 110, 210 (which may be the substrate 210 of an immediately preceding removable lens layer 200 or the substrate 110 of the base layer 100 as the case may be), the fluoropolymer coating(s) 230 may abut the moth eye coatings 120a, 220. Upon laminating the stacked removable lens layer(s) 200 to the base layer 100, each fluoropolymer coating 230 may thus be molded to fit the moth eye coating 120a, 220 of the immediately preceding layer 100, 200. The resulting mechanical interlocking of the moth eye coatings 120a, 220 with the molded female patterns corresponding thereto formed in the adjacent fluoropolymer coatings 230 may function similarly to a zipper to fix the adjacent layers together. Owing to this mechanical interlocking, the use of an acrylic or other tacky adhesive on the moth eye coating 120a, 220 may be entirely avoided, preventing the increased peel strength associated with such conventional adhesives collecting around the bumps of the moth eye coating 120a, 220. Thus, the removable lens layer(s) 200 may advantageously have a much lower peel strength, which may be less than 100 grams per inch and may, for example, be between 15 and 50 grams per inch or more particularly between 15 and 30 grams per inch (e.g. 25 grams per inch), making it possible for the wearer to remove each layer 200 as desired with a reasonable amount of pulling force. (It is noted that the use of a tacky adhesive to affix the base layer 100 to a surface may not present a problem since the base layer 100 need not be removable and thus an increased peel strength caused by buildup of adhesive around the bumps of the optional moth eye coating 120b may be acceptable.)
The substrate 110, 210 of each layer 100, 200 may comprise a transparent polymer such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and may be 1 to 10 mil thick, for example, around 2 mil thick for the substrate 210 of each removable lens layer 200 with the substrate 110 of the base layer 100 being the same thickness or typically thicker (e.g. 7 mil). The moth eye coating 220 of each of the removable lens layers 200, as well as the moth eye coating(s) 120a, 120b of the base layer 100, may comprise a polymer and may typically be made of a hard polymer such as glassy carbon having a Mohs hardness of 7, for example. The moth eye coating 120a, 120b, 220 may define a pattern of nano sized micro-projections or bumps (e.g. transparent cones) on the surface of the substrate 110, 210 with dimensions on the order of the wavelength of light (e.g. visible light), such as half-wave pitch and/or half-wave height, to produce the antireflective effect. For example, the pitch and/or height of the bumps may be 200-375 nm. Various shapes are possible for the bumps of the moth eye coating 120a, 120b, 220, including rounded or rectangular raised surfaces instead of cones, for example.
The moth eye coating 120a, 120b, 220 may be refractive index matched (e.g. to within 0.2) with the substrates 110, 210 and with the fluoropolymer coating(s) 230, as well as with any adhesives that may be used (as described below), such that the entire removable lens stack 10 may have a consistent index of refraction (e.g. within 0.2). However, because the refractive index interface between the air and the removable lens stack 10 may be effectively eliminated by the outermost moth eye coating 220 (as the interface appears like a gradient rather than a sudden change in material from the perspective of incident light), it is not necessary to index match the removable lens stack 10 to air (n=1). Therefore, it is contemplated that a wide variety of materials may be used for the substrates 110, 210 and other components of the removable lens stack 10.
In general, when building a conventional removable lens stack, a removable bonding material is used to wet each pair of adjacent surfaces together. The term “wetting,” in this context, may refer to when two surfaces come in such close contact with each other that the contact displaces all of the air in between the two surfaces, allowing for good bonding. Whereas simply laying one lens on top of another lens does not disperse the air trapped between the lenses, an acrylic removable adhesive may be used to wet the surfaces together and promote bonding. By matching the refractive index of the adhesive with the refractive index(es) of the lenses (e.g. to within 0.2), visible light may stay at a constant speed at the interfaces, minimizing reflections. An example of such a system may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 9,295,297, entitled “Adhesive Mountable Stack of Removable Layers,” the entire contents of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein. However, because adhesive is tacky to the touch, issues arise when bonding two surfaces together where one or both surfaces have a moth eye coating. In particular, as described above, the adhesive fills in around the micro-projections of the moth eye coating, drastically increasing the peel strength beyond what is functionally suitable for a removable lens stack.
Therefore, in order to wet the surfaces of the substrates 110, 210 together and achieve the preferred peel strength in the disclosed removable lens stack 10, the fluoropolymer coating(s) 230 may be provided on the second side 214 of each substrate 210. The fluoropolymer coating 230 may be an index-matched (e.g. to within 0.2) soft fluoropolymer such as fluorinated ethylene-propylene copolymer (FEP), perfluoroalkoxy alkane (PFA), or tetrafluoroethylene perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether) (MFA) that is not tacky to the touch but is moldable under laminating pressure to produce a debossed (female) pattern corresponding to the bumps of the abutting moth eye coating 120a, 220.
In some cases, an adhesion treatment 140a, 240 may be provided between the substrate 110 and moth eye coating 120a of the base layer 100 and/or between the substrate 210 and moth eye coating 220 of each removable lens layer 200. Likewise, if the substrate 110 of the base layer 100 further includes a moth eye coating 120b on the second side 114 thereof, an adhesion treatment 140b may be provided between the substrate 110 and the moth eye coating 120b. In each removable lens layer 200, an adhesion treatment 250 may similarly be provided between the substrate 210 and the fluoropolymer coating 230. The adhesion treatments 140a, 140b, 240, 250 may comprise a pressure sensitive adhesive such as a silicone adhesive (e.g. a polydimethyl/methylvinyl siloxane polymer and resin dispersed in toluene/isopropyl alcohol such as an adhesive sold under the name DOWSIL™ 7655 Adhesive or DOWSIL™ 7656 Adhesive by the Dow Chemical Company). The adhesive may be index matched (e.g. to within 0.2) with the substrates 110, 210 and other elements of the removable lens stack 10 as noted above.
The base layer 100 and one or more removable lens layers 200 may be manufactured by coating each substrate 110, 210 with the moth eye coating(s) 120a, 120b, 220 and fluoropolymer coating 230, which may in some cases be adhered to the substrates 110, 210 by adhesion treatments 140a, 140b, 240, 250 as described above. In order to improve adhesion, it is also contemplated that a corona treatment may be applied between the substrate 110, 210 and the moth eye coating 120a, 120b, 220, and/or between the substrate 210 and the fluoropolymer coating 220. This may ensure that the fluoropolymer coating 220 remains with the outermost removable lens layer 200 as it is pulled off the removable lens stack 10, for example. The corona treatment may be applied instead of or in addition to the above-described adhesion treatments 140a, 140b, 240, 250. The removable lens layer(s) 200 may then be stacked on top of the base layer 100 such that the second side 214 of the substrate 210 of each removable lens layer 200 faces the first side 112, 212 of the substrate 110, 210 of an immediately preceding layer from among the base layer 100 and the one or more removable lens layers 200 (as the case may be). In the illustrated example shown in
The removable lens layer(s) 200 may then be laminated to the base layer 100 under pressure with or without heat, for example, under pressure at a temperature less than 40° C. It should be noted that the base layer 100 and removable lens layer(s) 200 may be laminated together in a single lamination process or in multiple lamination processes, for example, with each removable lens layer 200 added to the stack in a separate lamination process (or with multiple removable lens layers 200 being laminated together before being laminated to the base layer 100). As a result of the lamination, each fluoropolymer coating 230 may be molded to fit the moth eye coating 120a, 220 of the immediately preceding layer. In particular, the hard bumps of the moth eye coating 120a, 220 may press into the soft fluoropolymer coating 230 to produce the corresponding debossed (female) pattern in the fluoropolymer coating 230. In this way, the above-described mechanical interlocking between the layers 100, 200 may be achieved to produce the desired peel strength (e.g. 25 grams per inch) without the use of tacky adhesives between the layers 100, 200 that might otherwise fill in between the bumps and increase the peel strength too much. At the same time, the air between the layers 100, 200 may be expelled during the laminating process, allowing for wetting of the opposing layers 100, 200 (and slight adhesion as a result), while the refractive index interface may be effectively eliminated due to the index gradient created by the architecture of the moth eye coatings 120a, 220. The resulting visible light transmission (VLT) of the removable lens stack 10 may be greater than 95% (e.g. 96% with 4% reflection), as opposed to 92% with 8% reflection that might be found in an uncoated lens. In some cases, the VLT may be greater than 98% (e.g. >99%), especially when the moth eye coating 120b is provided so that there are moth eye coatings 120a, 120b, 220 on both sides of the stack 10.
When the removable lens stack 10 is incorporated into eyewear and being worn, the wearer may easily peel off the outermost removable lens layer 200 to reveal an unblemished removable lens layer 200 (or the base layer 100) underneath. In the case of a removable lens stack 10 having multiple removable lens layers 200, the pulling force used to remove the outermost removable lens layer 200 may generally involve an initial outward force (perpendicular to the stack 10) as the wearer lifts the outermost removable lens layer 200 off the stack 10 on one side to separate it from the other removable lens layers 200 (e.g. by grasping an easily accessible tab on one side of the stack 10), followed by a continuous sideways force (with a component parallel to the stack 10) as the wearer peels the outermost removable lens layer 200 off. It is contemplated that the continuous sideways force that is responsible for the majority of the separation of the removable lens layers 200 may have more of a tendency to lift off the outermost removable lens layer 200 than to separate subsequent layers 200 underneath. Therefore, the wearer can readily peel off one layer 200 at a time without accidentally tearing off additional layers 200 of the removable lens stack 10.
Hybrid stacks are also contemplated, in which one or more layers having moth eye coatings may be combined with one or more layers having alternative types of antireflective coatings such as single or multi-layer interference antireflective coatings. By way of example,
One or more additional removable lens layers 400 may also be added to the stack, each including a substrate 410, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating 440 on a first side 412, and an adhesive 450 such as an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side 414. One such removable lens layer 400 may be stacked on the removable lens layer 300 such that the second side 414 of the substrate 410 faces the first side 312 of the substrate 300. Further removable lens layers 400 may be stacked thereon, with the second side 414 of each substrate 410 facing the first side 412 of each preceding substrate 400. By using an antireflective coating 340, 440 that does not have bumps like the moth eye coating 120a, any concern about the adhesive 450 filling in around the bumps and undesirably increasing the peel strength can be avoided. As a result, various kinds of adhesive 450 may be used including an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive such as a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), which may adhere (e.g., with the application of pressure) to the antireflective coating 340, 440 of the preceding layer 300, 400. The hybrid removable lens stack 20 may effectively achieve the superior antireflective properties of moth eye by incorporating it in one or more layers while at the same time benefiting from one or more layers having less expensive antireflective coatings 340, 440 and/or adhesives 450. The hybrid removable lens stack 20 may thus represent a “best of both worlds” compromise that balances the need for a high degree of antireflection with the manufacturing costs.
In the example of
It should also be noted that the use of moth eye coatings on both sides of a single layer (i.e., forward and rear facing moth-eye patterns) is not necessarily limited to the base layer 100. Either of the removable lens stacks 10, 20 may include such double-sided moth-eye layers at any position in the stack. For example, the stack may consist of multiple layers 100 stacked on top of each other (which may in some cases be the only type of layer in the stack such as a stack consisting of three layers 100). Between each pair of adjacent layers 100, a fluoropolymer coating may be applied that may mold to the shape of the moth-eye coating as described above, except that in this case the fluoropolymer coating may mold to the shapes of two moth-eye coatings that face each other with the fluoropolymer coating therebetween. As one example method of stacking multiple such double-sided moth-eye layers 100, the fluoropolymer coating may be coated on the forward-facing moth-eye coating 120a of a first layer 100, causing one side of the fluoropolymer coating to mold to the shape of the forward-facing moth-eye coating 120a, and then a second layer 100 may be stacked on the fluoropolymer coating and laminated, causing the other side of the fluoropolymer coating to mold to the shape of the rear-facing moth-eye coating 120b of the second layer 100. Stacking of further layers 100 can continue in the same way (or in combination with other types of layers as described above), with the fluoropolymer coating being molded to the shapes of two adjacent moth-eye coatings wherever necessary. Preferably, a release treatment may be applied to each forward-facing moth-eye coating 120a, and/or an adhesion promoting treatment may be applied to each rear-facing moth-eye coating 120b, thus encouraging the fluoropolymer coating to come off with each layer 100 as it is removed from the stack. By using double-sided moth-eye layers in this way, a high degree of antireflection can be achieved. Moreover, depending on the moth-eye fabrication processes used, producing two moth-eye coatings 120a, 120b on the same substrate 110 may be more cost effective than producing individual moth-eye coatings on separate substrates, making the use of double-sided moth-eye layers potentially more efficient. Manufacturing processes may also be simplified (and costs reduced) by the use of the same repeated layer 100 in place of multiple different layers.
Given the very low reflectance that may be achievable using a base layer 100 having a forward-facing moth-eye coating 120a and/or a rear-facing moth-eye coating 120b, it is contemplated that a stack having an acceptable degree of antireflection may be achieved without necessarily requiring moth-eye or single or multi-layer interference anti-reflective coatings on the removable layers. In particular, it has been found that an acrylic coating, such as an acrylic coating of a hard coat applied to a PET substrate, may increase the smoothness of the outer surface of the substrate (which may have been roughened during production for ease of handling), thus lowering haze, while the lower refractive index of the acrylic coating in comparison to the PET substrate reduces reflection making the stack more anti-reflective. It has similarly been found that a fluoropolymer coating (e.g., silicone or Teflon), such as a fluoropolymer coating of a hard coat applied to a PET substrate, may likewise increase the smoothness of the outer surface and lower haze while similarly making the stack more anti-reflective due to the difference in refractive index. In combination with moth-eye coating(s) 120a, 120b on a base layer 100, such a stack including acrylic or fluoropolymer coatings on the removable layers may strike a balance between quality and cost-effectiveness. In addition, the acrylic or fluoropolymer coating may advantageously comprise an acrylic or fluoropolymer hard coat, which may contain silica beads, for example. In this way, the contemplated coatings may provide the functionality of a hard coat (e.g., increased scratch resistance) in addition to providing the anti-reflective effect.
Referring to
One or more additional removable lens layers 600 may also be added to the stack, each including a substrate 610, an acrylic or fluoropolymer coating 640 (e.g., a hard coat) on a first side 612, and an adhesive 650 such as an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side 614. One such removable lens layer 600 may be stacked on the removable lens layer 500 such that the second side 614 of the substrate 610 faces the first side 512 of the substrate 500. While not specifically illustrated, further removable lens layers 600 may be stacked thereon, with the second side 614 of each substrate 610 facing the first side 612 of each preceding substrate 600. By using an acrylic or fluoropolymer coating 540, 640 (which does not have bumps like the moth eye coating 120a) in place of a conventional anti-reflective coating, any concern about the adhesive 650 filling in around the bumps and undesirably increasing the peel strength can be avoided. As a result, various kinds of adhesive 650 may be used including an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive such as a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), which may adhere (e.g., with the application of pressure) to the acrylic or fluoropolymer coating 540, 640 (e.g., hard coat) of the preceding layer 500, 600. The hybrid removable lens stack 30 may effectively achieve the superior antireflective properties of moth eye by incorporating it in one or more layers while at the same time benefiting from one or more layers having less expensive coatings 540, 640 and/or adhesives 550, with the coatings 540, 640 in some cases serving a dual purpose of providing adequate antireflective properties as well as hard coat functionality.
The above description is given by way of example, and not limitation. Given the above disclosure, one skilled in the art could devise variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed herein. Further, the various features of the embodiments disclosed herein can be used alone, or in varying combinations with each other and are not intended to be limited to the specific combination described herein. Thus, the scope of the claims is not to be limited by the illustrated embodiments.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 18/315,394, filed May 10, 2023, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 18/167,673, filed Feb. 10, 2023, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,709,296, issued Jul. 25, 2023, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/655,328, filed Mar. 17, 2022, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,624,859, issued Apr. 11, 2023, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/386,304, filed Jul. 27, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,329, issued Apr. 19, 2022, the contents of each of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1337036 | Bergmann | Apr 1920 | A |
1366907 | Dunand | Feb 1921 | A |
2138086 | Blodjer | Nov 1938 | A |
2248331 | Blodjer | Jul 1941 | A |
2328687 | Serr | Sep 1943 | A |
2339280 | Harold | Jan 1944 | A |
2354415 | Woodard | Jul 1944 | A |
2461604 | Huntsman | Feb 1949 | A |
2511329 | Craig | Jun 1950 | A |
2546117 | Whelan | Mar 1951 | A |
2563125 | Malcom, Jr. | Aug 1951 | A |
2569715 | Green | Oct 1951 | A |
2640068 | Schaefer et al. | May 1953 | A |
2736109 | Scholl | Feb 1956 | A |
2923944 | Lindblom | Feb 1960 | A |
2963708 | Herbine et al. | Dec 1960 | A |
3095575 | Radov | Jul 1963 | A |
3298031 | Harold | Jan 1967 | A |
3475766 | Raschke | Nov 1969 | A |
3577565 | Feldmann et al. | May 1971 | A |
3605115 | Bohner | Sep 1971 | A |
3685054 | Raschke | Aug 1972 | A |
3774239 | Kotzar | Nov 1973 | A |
3785102 | Amos | Jan 1974 | A |
3797042 | Gager | Mar 1974 | A |
3810815 | Welhart et al. | May 1974 | A |
3868293 | Selph | Feb 1975 | A |
3937863 | Moore | Feb 1976 | A |
3948662 | Alston et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3950580 | Boudet | Apr 1976 | A |
3987569 | Chase | Oct 1976 | A |
4063740 | Mader | Dec 1977 | A |
4076373 | Moretti | Feb 1978 | A |
4090464 | Bishopp et al. | May 1978 | A |
D249597 | Dillon | Sep 1978 | S |
4138746 | Bergmann | Feb 1979 | A |
D254638 | Bay, Jr. | Apr 1980 | S |
4204231 | Permenter | May 1980 | A |
4248762 | Hornibrook et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4248918 | Hornibrook et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4268134 | Gulati et al. | May 1981 | A |
4273098 | Silverstein | Jun 1981 | A |
4301193 | Zuk | Nov 1981 | A |
4332861 | Franz et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4333983 | Allen | Jun 1982 | A |
4380563 | Ayotte | Apr 1983 | A |
4528701 | Smith | Jul 1985 | A |
4557980 | Hodnett, III | Dec 1985 | A |
4582764 | Allerd et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4625341 | Broersma | Dec 1986 | A |
4658515 | Oatman | Apr 1987 | A |
4696860 | Epperson | Sep 1987 | A |
4701965 | Landis | Oct 1987 | A |
4716601 | Mcneal | Jan 1988 | A |
4726074 | Baclit et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4729179 | Quist, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
4769265 | Coburn, Jr. | Sep 1988 | A |
D299767 | Hsin | Feb 1989 | S |
4842919 | David et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4850049 | Landis et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4852185 | Olson | Aug 1989 | A |
4852186 | Landis | Aug 1989 | A |
4853974 | Olim | Aug 1989 | A |
4856535 | Forbes | Aug 1989 | A |
4864653 | Landis | Sep 1989 | A |
4867178 | Smith | Sep 1989 | A |
4884296 | Nix, Jr. | Dec 1989 | A |
4884302 | Foehl | Dec 1989 | A |
4889754 | Vargas | Dec 1989 | A |
D306363 | Stackhouse et al. | Feb 1990 | S |
4907090 | Ananian | Mar 1990 | A |
4911964 | Corbo | Mar 1990 | A |
D307065 | Friedman | Apr 1990 | S |
4920576 | Landis | May 1990 | A |
4934792 | Tovi | Jun 1990 | A |
4945573 | Landis | Aug 1990 | A |
4950445 | Salce et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
D311263 | Russell | Oct 1990 | S |
4964171 | Landis | Oct 1990 | A |
4965887 | Paoluccio et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4973511 | Farmer et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4975981 | Ray | Dec 1990 | A |
5000528 | Kawakatsu | Mar 1991 | A |
5002326 | Spicer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
D318147 | Russell | Jul 1991 | S |
5035004 | Koester | Jul 1991 | A |
D319449 | Millar | Aug 1991 | S |
5046195 | Koritan | Sep 1991 | A |
D321268 | Nix, Jr. | Oct 1991 | S |
5052054 | Birum | Oct 1991 | A |
5054480 | Bare et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067475 | Posnansky | Nov 1991 | A |
5071206 | Hood et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
H1023 | Wiseman | Mar 1992 | H |
5104929 | Bilkadi | Apr 1992 | A |
5113528 | Burke, Jr. et al. | May 1992 | A |
D331820 | Scanlon | Dec 1992 | S |
D333366 | Brown | Feb 1993 | S |
5183700 | Austin | Feb 1993 | A |
5194293 | Foster | Mar 1993 | A |
5201077 | Dondlinger | Apr 1993 | A |
5206956 | Olson | May 1993 | A |
5208916 | Kelman | May 1993 | A |
5239406 | Lynam | Aug 1993 | A |
5318685 | O'Shaughnessy | Jun 1994 | A |
D349177 | Russell | Jul 1994 | S |
D349178 | Russell | Jul 1994 | S |
5327180 | Hester, III et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
D349362 | Russell | Aug 1994 | S |
5364671 | Gustafson | Nov 1994 | A |
5365615 | Piszkin | Nov 1994 | A |
D353691 | Scanlon | Dec 1994 | S |
D354588 | Russell | Jan 1995 | S |
D354589 | Russell | Jan 1995 | S |
5420649 | Lewis | May 1995 | A |
D359586 | Lofton | Jun 1995 | S |
D361160 | Russell | Aug 1995 | S |
5443877 | Kramer et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
D362086 | Russell | Sep 1995 | S |
5468247 | Matthai et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471036 | Sperbeck | Nov 1995 | A |
5473778 | Bell | Dec 1995 | A |
5486883 | Candido | Jan 1996 | A |
5507332 | McKinnon | Apr 1996 | A |
5510173 | Pass et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512116 | Campfield | Apr 1996 | A |
5523132 | Zhang et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
RE35318 | Warman | Aug 1996 | E |
5544361 | Fine et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553608 | Reese et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555570 | Bay | Sep 1996 | A |
5557683 | Eubanks | Sep 1996 | A |
5584130 | Perron | Dec 1996 | A |
5592698 | Woods | Jan 1997 | A |
5593786 | Parker et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5622580 | Mannheim | Apr 1997 | A |
5633049 | Bilkadi et al. | May 1997 | A |
5668612 | Hung | Sep 1997 | A |
5671483 | Reuber | Sep 1997 | A |
5673431 | Batty | Oct 1997 | A |
5687420 | Chong | Nov 1997 | A |
5694650 | Hong | Dec 1997 | A |
5702415 | Matthai et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709825 | Shih | Jan 1998 | A |
5740560 | Muoio | Apr 1998 | A |
5792535 | Weder | Aug 1998 | A |
5806102 | Park | Sep 1998 | A |
5815848 | Jarvis | Oct 1998 | A |
5819311 | Lo | Oct 1998 | A |
5846659 | Hartmut et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
D404849 | Desy | Jan 1999 | S |
5885704 | Peiffer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896991 | Hippely et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5924129 | Gill | Jul 1999 | A |
5937596 | Leeuwenburgh et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956175 | Hojnowski | Sep 1999 | A |
5972453 | Akiwa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991072 | Solyntjes et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991081 | Haaland et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991930 | Sorrentino | Nov 1999 | A |
D418256 | Caruana | Dec 1999 | S |
6008299 | Mcgrath et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6049419 | Wheatley et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6085358 | Cogan | Jul 2000 | A |
6173447 | Arnold | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6217099 | Mckinney et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221112 | Snider | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237147 | Brockman | May 2001 | B1 |
6250765 | Murakami | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6305073 | Badders | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6347401 | Joyce | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375865 | Paulson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378133 | Daikuzono | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381750 | Mangan | May 2002 | B1 |
6385776 | Linday | May 2002 | B2 |
6388813 | Wilson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403005 | Mientus et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416872 | Maschwitz | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432522 | Friedman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461709 | Janssen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469752 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481019 | Diaz et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491390 | Provost | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531180 | Takushima et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536045 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536589 | Chang | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6555235 | Aufderheide et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559902 | Kusuda et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576349 | Lingle et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584614 | Hogg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592950 | Toshima et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614423 | Wong et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622311 | Diaz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
D480838 | Martin | Oct 2003 | S |
6654071 | Chen | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660389 | Liu et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6662371 | Shin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667738 | Murphy | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6739718 | Jung | May 2004 | B1 |
6745396 | Landis et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6750922 | Benning | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6773778 | Onozawa et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773816 | Tsutsumi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777055 | Janssen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800378 | Hawa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6838610 | De Moraes | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841190 | Liu et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847492 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6864882 | Newton | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870686 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879319 | Cok | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6907617 | Johnson | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911593 | Mazumder et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922850 | Arnold | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6952950 | Doe et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967044 | O'Brien | Nov 2005 | B1 |
D512797 | Canavan et al. | Dec 2005 | S |
6973677 | Diaz et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995976 | Richardson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7070837 | Ross | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7071927 | Blanchard | Jul 2006 | B2 |
D526446 | Cowan et al. | Aug 2006 | S |
7097080 | Cox | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101810 | Bond et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103920 | Otterson | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7143979 | Wood et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7184217 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
D541991 | Lawrence | May 2007 | S |
7215473 | Fleming | May 2007 | B2 |
7226176 | Huang | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7238401 | Dietz | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7311956 | Pitzen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
D559442 | Regelbrugge et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
7344241 | Baek | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351470 | Draheim et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
D569557 | Cho | May 2008 | S |
7389869 | Mason, Jr. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7410684 | Mccormick | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7425369 | Oakey et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
D586052 | Elias | Feb 2009 | S |
7495895 | Carnevali | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7597441 | Farwig | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7629052 | Brumwell | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7631365 | Mahan | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7663047 | Hanuschak | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7709095 | Persoone et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722921 | Shimoda et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727615 | Kato et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735156 | VanDerWoude et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752682 | Vanderwoude et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7812077 | Borade et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7858001 | Qin et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7937775 | Manzella, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7957524 | Chipping | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8024818 | Davenport | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8044942 | Leonhard et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8101277 | Logan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8234722 | VanDerWoude et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8261375 | Reaux | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8282234 | VanDerWoude et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292347 | Drake | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8294843 | Hollaway | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8316470 | McNeal et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8361260 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8407818 | VanDerWoude et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
D683077 | Klotz et al. | May 2013 | S |
8455105 | Hobeika et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
D692187 | Isobe | Oct 2013 | S |
D692189 | Isobe | Oct 2013 | S |
8567596 | Mason, Jr. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8693102 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8819869 | VanDerWoude et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8889801 | Liao et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8918198 | Atanasoff | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8974620 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
D726378 | Wako | Apr 2015 | S |
8999509 | Port et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9023162 | Mccormick et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9104256 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9128545 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9150763 | Lopez et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9161858 | Capers et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9170415 | Mansuy | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9173437 | VanDerWoude et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204823 | Derenne et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9274625 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9295297 | Wilson | Mar 2016 | B2 |
D759900 | Cummings et al. | Jun 2016 | S |
9442306 | Hines et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9471163 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9526290 | Wilson | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9575231 | Chu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
D781507 | Huh | Mar 2017 | S |
D781508 | Huh | Mar 2017 | S |
9629407 | Foster | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9671622 | Vetrini et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9706808 | Sclafani et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9726940 | Tomiyasu | Aug 2017 | B2 |
D805256 | Yang | Dec 2017 | S |
9905297 | Best | Feb 2018 | B2 |
D815190 | Dellemann | Apr 2018 | S |
9968155 | Wilson | May 2018 | B2 |
10070678 | Wilson | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10165819 | Klotz et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10201207 | VanDerWoude et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10226095 | Wilson | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10227501 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
D849240 | Guo et al. | May 2019 | S |
D850256 | Ryszawy | Jun 2019 | S |
10321731 | Wilson | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10345934 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10384084 | Isham et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10427385 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10449397 | VanDerWoude et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10520756 | Gallina et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10537236 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
D879384 | Sato | Mar 2020 | S |
D882182 | Fekete | Apr 2020 | S |
10620670 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10687569 | Mcdirmid | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10716986 | Winter et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10874163 | VanDerWoude et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
D907299 | Brown, II et al. | Jan 2021 | S |
D907300 | Brown, II et al. | Jan 2021 | S |
D925129 | Wilson | Jul 2021 | S |
D925834 | Babin et al. | Jul 2021 | S |
11090516 | VanDerWoude et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11141959 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11147323 | Wilson | Oct 2021 | B1 |
11307329 | Wilson | Apr 2022 | B1 |
11480801 | Morris et al. | Oct 2022 | B1 |
11490667 | Wilson | Nov 2022 | B1 |
11510718 | Childers et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11548356 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
11579339 | Thothadri et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
11709296 | Wilson | Jul 2023 | B2 |
11807078 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2023 | B2 |
11988850 | Wilson et al. | May 2024 | B2 |
20010035936 | Maisnik | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020025441 | Hieda et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020036362 | Chigira et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020101411 | Chang | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020109922 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114934 | Liu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122925 | Liu et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020159159 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020195910 | Hus et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012936 | Draheim et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030087054 | Janssen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110613 | Ross | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040004605 | David | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040109096 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040121105 | Janssen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040139530 | Yan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202812 | Congard et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227722 | Friberg et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238690 | Wood et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040246386 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258933 | Enniss et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002108 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015860 | Reaux | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050071909 | Diaz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050133035 | Yahiaoui et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050180877 | Usami et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186415 | Mccormick et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188821 | Yamashita et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200154 | Barbee et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050249957 | Jing et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260343 | Han | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060024494 | Amano et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052167 | Boddicker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056030 | Fukuda et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057399 | Persoone et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060114245 | Masters et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138694 | Biernath et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158609 | Heil | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177654 | Shoshi | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204776 | Chen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254088 | Mccormick | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285218 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019300 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070181456 | Kusuda et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211002 | Zehner et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070212508 | Mase | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070229962 | Mason | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234592 | Crates | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234888 | Rotolo De Moraes | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286995 | Li et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080014446 | Donea et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030631 | Gallagher | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080030675 | Dillon | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055258 | Sauers | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080118678 | Huang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080151177 | Wang | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160321 | Padiyath et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176018 | Enniss et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192351 | Miyagawa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080231979 | Chen | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256688 | Bruce | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080286500 | Sussner et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292820 | Padiyath et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090011205 | Thiel | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026095 | Lofland et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054115 | Horrdin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090086415 | Chipping | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090087655 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105437 | Determan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119819 | Thompson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090181242 | Enniss et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090233032 | Craig | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090239045 | Kato et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090239048 | Sugihara et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100026646 | Xiao et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100033442 | Kusuda et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100102197 | Mcintyre | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102476 | Higgins | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122402 | Tipp | May 2010 | A1 |
20100146679 | Heil | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100238119 | Dubrovsky et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245273 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100270189 | Pedersen, II et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110007388 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110010994 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012841 | Lin | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013273 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110014481 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035936 | Lee | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052864 | Son | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110097574 | Faldysta et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119801 | Wright | May 2011 | A1 |
20110165361 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110168261 | Welser et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110267793 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110271497 | Suh et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277361 | Nichol et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110279383 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120003431 | Huang | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030095 | Marshall et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047614 | Choi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120070603 | Hsu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081792 | Neuffer | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120137414 | Saylor | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120180204 | Hawkins | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183712 | Leonhard et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188743 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120200816 | Krasnov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120291173 | Gleason et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130045371 | O'Donnell | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083285 | McNeal et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130089688 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130098543 | Reuter et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130141693 | McCabe et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130145525 | Arenson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130222913 | Tomoda et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130247286 | Vanderwoude et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130293959 | Mcdonald | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140020153 | Romanski et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140050909 | Choi et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140220283 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140259321 | Arnold | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289937 | Capers et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150033431 | Hofer Kraner et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150103474 | Cho | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150131047 | Saylor et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150202847 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150234209 | Miyamoto et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150258715 | Ohta | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150294656 | Hanuschak | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309609 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150349147 | Xi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150359675 | Wilson | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160023442 | Faris | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160050990 | Hayes | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160073720 | Niedrich | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160231834 | Hardi | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160259102 | Taka | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160271922 | Uzawa et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160291543 | Saito | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160318227 | Kim et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170052286 | Hines et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170071792 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079364 | Paulson | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170129219 | Uebelacker et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170173923 | Davis et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170192131 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170208878 | Kakinuma et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170232713 | Mannheim Astete et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170281414 | Wilson | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170299898 | Gallina et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170318877 | Yahiaoui et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180029337 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180042324 | King | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180052334 | Repko | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180094164 | Ito et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180148578 | Ohta et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180161208 | Huh | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180229480 | Chung | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180236753 | Wykoff, II et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180295925 | Gagliardo et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180338550 | Boulware et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190021430 | Elliott | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190037948 | Romanski et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190116300 | Okuno | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190118057 | Winter et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190209912 | Isserow et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190212474 | Le Quang et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190346591 | Thothadri et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190389182 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200100657 | Lee et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200115519 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200124768 | Wilson | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200134773 | Pinter et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200154808 | Inouye | May 2020 | A1 |
20200178622 | Jascomb et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200247102 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200261055 | Zwierstra et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200281301 | Wynalda, Jr. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200310494 | Ahn et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200359718 | Jefferis et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200375272 | Ulmer et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200384747 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210030095 | Reicher | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210162645 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210283994 | Wilson | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210298380 | Brown, II et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210298390 | Sup, IV et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210307425 | Keim | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210315291 | Votolato et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210318553 | Gharabegian | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210321692 | Wilson | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210321693 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210329999 | Ackerman | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20210368886 | Swart et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210386155 | Rose | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210393440 | Leatt et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210394427 | Frisco et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220015472 | Boza | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20230106407 | Arima et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005244595 | Jul 2006 | AU |
2015277196 | Jan 2017 | AU |
2386043 | Nov 2003 | CA |
3637188 | May 1988 | DE |
19808535 | Sep 1999 | DE |
202004010014 | Apr 2005 | DE |
202020101562 | Apr 2020 | DE |
202020101794 | Apr 2020 | DE |
192075 | Aug 1986 | EP |
671258 | Sep 1995 | EP |
1471415 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1517791 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1047537 | Mar 2010 | EP |
3157480 | Apr 2017 | EP |
2310862 | Sep 1997 | GB |
2492574 | Jan 2013 | GB |
61017860 | Jan 1986 | JP |
S6117860 | Jan 1986 | JP |
62053832 | Mar 1987 | JP |
04314537 | Nov 1992 | JP |
06143496 | May 1994 | JP |
07021456 | Jan 1995 | JP |
10167765 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2000334812 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2002328613 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2012183822 | Sep 2012 | JP |
2014032222 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2015128896 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2018200329 | Dec 2018 | JP |
6767596 | Oct 2020 | JP |
20120001292 | Jan 2012 | KR |
200700793 | Jan 2007 | TW |
201027992 | Jul 2010 | TW |
0024576 | May 2000 | WO |
03052678 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2009008857 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2015009114 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2015091425 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015093413 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015195814 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2019006151 | Jan 2019 | WO |
2019055267 | Mar 2019 | WO |
2021176316 | Sep 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Prosecution History of U.S. Re-Examination U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,073 titled Touch Screen Protector; pp. 1-1,980. |
www.store.moshimode.com; “iVisor AG for iPad 2 Black”; 2004-2010. |
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Oct. 25, 2013; pp. 1-31. |
Jake Gaecke; “Appletell Reviews the iVisor for iPad”; www.appletell.com; Sep. 15, 2010 at 12:32 p.m. www.technologytell.com/apple/60407/appletell-reviews-ag-for-ipad/; 2 pages. |
www.nushield.com/technology.php; “What Makes NuShield Screen Protectors Superior”, 2 pages. |
www.spigen.com; “Something You Want”; 2 pages. |
www.zagg.com; “Apple iPad 2 (Wi-Fi 3G) Screen Protector”; 2 pages. |
www.gadgetguard.com; “Invisible Gadget Guard, the Original”; 1 page. |
www.incipotech.com; “Protect Your iPhone 4 with Screen Protectors from Incipo”; 3 pages. |
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG iPad Screen Protector”; Jul. 2010; 7 pages. |
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor XT Crystal Clear Protector for iPad”; Aug. 2010; 3 pages. |
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG for iPad 2 Black”; Mar. 2011; 5 pages. |
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG for iPad 2 White”; Mar. 2011; 3 pages. |
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG for iPhone 4/4S Black”; Nov. 2010; 5 pages. |
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG for iPhone 4/4S White”; May 2010; 4 pages. |
Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com) 2012. |
Racing Optics, Inc. v. Aevoe, Inc., d/b/a/ Moshi; Case No. 15-cv-017744-JCM-VCF; Aevoe's Initial Disclosure Non-Infringement, Invalidity and Unenforceability Contentions (Redacted) dated Jan. 7, 2016. |
Defendant Aevoe Corp.'s Non-Infringement Contentions and Responses to Racing Optic's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,545) dated Jan. 7, 2016. |
Defendant Aevoe Corp.'s Non-Infringement Contentions and Responses to Racing Optic's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (U.S. Pat. No. 9,104,256) dated Jan. 7, 2016. |
Defendant Aevoe Corp.'s Non-Infringement Contentions and Responses to Racing Optic's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620) dated Jan. 7, 2016. |
I-Blason LLC v. Aevoe, Inc. and Aevoe Corp.; Case IPR2016-TBA; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,044,942 (including Exhibits 1001-1019). |
Dupont Teijin Films, “Mylar Polyester Film—Optical Properties”, Jun. 2003, 2 pages. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body, “Black Body”, Jul. 2009, 11 pages. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared, “Infrared”, Jul. 2009, 12 pages. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BoPET, “PET Film (biaxially oriented)”, Jul. 2009, 4 pages. |
Instashield LLC, Bionic Wrench® Inventor Creates Low-Cost Face Shield For Masses, Apr. 15, 2020, 3 pages. |
Tom Zillich, Surrey manufacturer hopes to hit home run with face shield that clips to baseball cap, Apr. 29, 2020, 3 pages. |
Opentip, Opromo Safety Face Shield Visor for Adult Kids, Protective Cotton Hat with Removable PVC Face Cover <https://www.opentip.com/product.php?products_id=11699030>, May 5, 2020, 3 pages. |
Hefute, Hefute 5 PCS Protective Face Cover with Shield Comfortable Full Protection Face Compatiable with Glasses Anti-Droplet Anti-Pollution and Windproof Transparent Safety Face Cover with Shield(Style B) <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B086GSG8DH/ref=sspa_dk_detail_9?psc=1&pd_rd_i=B086GSG8DH&pd_rd_w=Ocdm2&pf_rd_p=48d372c1-f7e1-4b8b-9d02-4bd86f5158c5&pd_rd_wg=qkB2b&pf_rd_r=M%E2%80%A6>, May 6, 2020, 7 pages. |
Geanbaye, Geanbaye Safety Full Face Shield Cap Detachable Baseball Cap Anti-Saliva Anti-Spitting Eye Protective Hat Windproof Dustproof <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B086DV32B8/ref=sspa_dk_detail_8?psc=1&pd_rd_i=B086DV32B8&pd_rd_w=MwjfT&pf_rd_p=48d372c1-f7e1-4b8b-9d02-4bd86f5158c5&pd_rd_wg=pxuOs&pf_rd_r=PNDA%E2%80%A6>, May 5, 2020, 8 pages. |
Leigh Buchanan, These 2 Companies Are Making Face Shields for Everyone <https://www.inc.com/leigh-buchanan/face-shields-coronavirus-protection-open-source.html>, May 6, 2020, 8 pages. |
Brim Shield, photographs, Apr. 21, 2020, 1 pages. |
Hatshield, Shield Yourself With The Hatshield <https://www.hat-shield.com/?gclid=CjwKCAjwp-X0BRAFEiwAheRui1u89v_3URuiwEVvBRGa9TaEfWoZVMJXRkWsZgPTUw-0fHJ5HD-8uhoCc84QAvD_BwE>, Apr. 17, 2020, 11 pages. |
Eli N. Perencevich, Moving Personal Protective Equipment Into the Community Face Shields and Containment of COVID-19, Apr. 29, 2020, 2 pages. |
Chang, Tian-Ci; Cao, Xun; Bao, Shan-Hu; Ji, Shi-Dong; Luo, Hong-Jie; Jin, Ping; Review of Thermochromic Vanadium Dioxide Based Smart Coatings: From Lab to Commercial Application; Dec. 16, 2017. |
Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC); “The Department of Transportation [DOT] Guidebook”; Oct. 2016. |
Hostaphan RBB, “Transparent, Temperature Stable Polyester Film for Cooking & Roasting Bags” Jul. 2016. |
Hostaphan Win, “White, Long-Term Stable, Thermally Stable Polyester Film for PV Back Sheet Laminates”; Jul. 2016. |
PCT Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/054565 (Dec. 20, 2019). |
PCT Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/036248 (Sep. 16, 2015). |
“Declaration of Jerome Aho”; Filed Aug. 3, 2007; Case 3:07-cv-00221-FDW-DCK; Includes: Exhibit A, Nascar Postcard (1 page), Exhibit B, 50th Anniversary Nascar letter sent Jan. 7, 1998 (1 page), and Exhibit C, Front page of “The Official Nascar Preview and Press Guide” (1 page); 9 pages. |
Racing Optics, Inc. v. David Leon O'Neal, Edward M. Wallace and Clear View Racing Optics, LLC; Case 3:07 CV 221; Includes: Exhibit A, Wilson et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,847,492; and Exhibit B, Wilson et al. U.S. Pat. No. 7,184,217; 34 pages. |
International Search Report; International Application No. PCT/US99/95128; Date of Completion: Jan. 18, 2000; 54 pages. |
International Search Report; International Application No. PCT/US02/10971; Date of Completion: Nov. 20, 2002; 3 pages. |
International Search Report; International Application No. PCT/US03/16284; Date of Completion: Mar. 9, 2004; 3 pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. 15809930.9-107 / 3157480 (Dec. 15, 2017). |
Canadian Office Action for Application Serial No. 2,952,436 (Nov. 15, 2019). |
Canadian Office Action for Application Serial No. 2,952,436 (May 3, 2019). |
Australian Examination Report for Application Serial No. 2015277196 (Oct. 18, 2018). |
www.wikipedia.org, Refractive Index, Oct. 31, 2014. |
Racing Optics, Inc. v. Aevoe Corp. Dba Moshi; Case 2:15-cv-01774-RCJ-VCF; “Answer to Aevoe's Counterclaims—Jury Trial Demanded”; Nov. 2, 2015; 15 pages. |
Gregory Brower et al.; “Complaint for Patent Infringement”; Sep. 15, 2015; 15 pages. |
Jeffrey A. Silverstri et al.; “Answer to Complaint for Patent Infringement”; Oct. 7, 2015; 59 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681; Aug. 26, 2016; 8 pages. |
List of References for U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681; Receipt date Jun. 30, 2016; 3 pages. |
List of References for U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681; Receipt date Apr. 27, 2016; 4 pages. |
Examiner's search strategy and results for U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681, filed Aug. 21, 2016; 2 pages. |
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Case No. IPR2016-01164; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,104,256 (including Exhibits 1001-1011 and Petitioner Power of Attorney Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42. 10(b) for Petition for Inter Partes Review); Jun. 21, 2016. |
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Case No. IPR2016-01165; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,545(including Exhibits 1001-1006 and Petitioner Power of Attorney Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42. 10(b) for Petition for Inter Partes Review); Jun. 21, 2016. |
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Case No. IPR2016-01166; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,274,625 (including Exhibits 1001-1011 and Petitioner Power of Attorney Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42. 10(b) for Petition for Inter Partes Review); Jun. 21, 2016. |
Exhibit 1—Invalidity Contentions re: '545 Patent Under LPR 1-8(b)-(d); at least as early as Jul. 1, 2016. |
Exhibit 2—Invalidity Contentions re: '256 Patent Under LPR 1-8(b)-(d); at least as early as Jul. 1, 2016. |
Exhibit 3—Invalidity Contentions re: '620 Patent Under LPR 1-8(b)-(d); at least as early as Jul. 1, 2016. |
Exhibit 4—Invalidity Contentions re: '625 Patent Under LPR 1-8(b)-(d); at least as early as Jul. 1, 2016. |
Exhibit 1002—U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,671 to Gustafson; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-6. |
Exhibit 1004—U.S. Pat. No. 7,351,470 to Draheim et al.; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-15. |
Exhibit 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620 to Wilson et al.; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-15. |
Exhibit 1003—U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,765 to Murakami; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; p. 1-8. |
Exhibit 1005—U.S. Pat. No. 7,957,524 to Chipping; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2017; pp. 1-20. |
Aevoe Corp., Racing Optics, Inc.; Petition for Inter Partes Review; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-55. |
Exhibit 1006—Japanese Application No. JP 2002-328613 to Kitaguchi Translation; IPR2016-01745; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-10. |
Exhibit 1009—U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,311; Interview Summary; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; p. 1-3. |
Exhibit 1010—U.S. Appl. No. 15/838,311; Notice of Allowance; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-8. |
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Declaration of Darran Cairns; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-32. |
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Petitioner's Power of Attorney; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-3. |
Exhibit 1007—U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,311; Response to Office Action; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; p. 1-19. |
Exhibit 1008—U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,311; Response and Request for Continued Examination; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-21. |
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Mandatory Notices; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-4. |
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Power of Attorney; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-4. |
Aevoe Corp v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Notice of Filing Date; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 6, 2016; p. 1-5. |
Aevoe Corp v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Decision; Case IPR2016-01164; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,104,256; at least as early as Nov. 7, 2016; p. 1-24. |
Aevoe Corp v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Decision; Case IPR2016-01166; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,274,625; at least as early as Nov. 7, 2016; p. 1-23. |
Aevoe Corp v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Decision; Case IPR2016-01165; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,545; at least as early as Nov. 7, 2016; p. 1-25. |
Settlement and License Agreement, Dec. 21, 2007, 28 pgs. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2016 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681, filed Apr. 5, 2016; 8 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for US2020/016245 (Apr. 28, 2020). |
Professional Plastics (http://www.professionalplastics.com/MelinexPETFilmDupont) 2012. |
Whitney, Frank D., Preliminary Injunction, Aug. 21, 2007, 5 pgs. |
Higgins, John P., Answer and Counterclaims to First Amended Complaint, Sep. 4, 2007, 27 pgs. |
Ballato, John, Expert Report of John Ballato, Ph.D., Nov. 12, 2007, 5 pgs. |
Russell, Geoffrey A., Rebuttal Report of Geoffrey A. Russell, Ph.D., on issues raised in the Export Report of John Ballato, Ph.D., Nov. 21, 2007, 15 pgs. |
Higgins, John P., Defendants' Second Supplement to Its Response to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, Dec. 7, 2007, 25 pgs. |
Barnhardt, John J. III, Redacted Version Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Dec. 3, 2007, 36 pgs. |
Higgins, John P., Defendants' Second Supplement to its Response to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, Dec. 7, 2007, 26 pgs. |
Whitney, Frank D., Consent Judgment Order, Jan. 3, 2008, 5 pgs. |
Ballato, John, Supplemental Expert Report of John Ballato, Ph.D., Nov. 19, 2007, 10 pgs. |
Moore, Steven D., Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' New and Untimely Invalidity Theory, Dec. 19, 2007, 3 pgs. |
Moore, Steven D., Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion to Strike Defendants' New and Untimely Invalidity Theory, Dec. 19, 2007, 10 pgs. |
Barnhardt, John J. III, Notice Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 282, Dec. 18, 2007, 3 pgs. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,952,436; Jul. 8, 2020. |
www.wikipedia.org. “Black Body”, Jul. 2009, 11 pages. |
www.wikipedia.org. “Infrared”, Jul. 2009, 12 pages. |
www.wikipedia.org. “PET Film (biaxially oriented)”, Jul. 2009, 4 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US99/25128 with International Search Report, Date of Completion Jan. 18, 2000, 54 Pages. |
English translation of TW201027992, “Monitor Protection Device for a Flat Panel Display”, 11 pgs. |
Pulse Racing Innovations, EZ Tear Universal Single Pull Tearoff Ramp, webpage <https://www.pulseracinginnovations.com>, Dec. 30, 2020, 6 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US20/24639, Jun. 11, 2020, 13 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/049919; Nov. 27, 2020. |
Tian-Chi Chang, Xun Cao, Shan-Hu Bao, Shi=Dong Ji, Hong-Jie Luo, Ping Jin; “Review on Thermochromic Vanadium Dioxide Based Smart Coatings: From Lab to Commercial Application”; Dec. 16, 2017. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/062230; Feb. 8, 2021. |
“Anti-reflective coating,” Wikipedia, last updated Jul. 13, 2017 by Andy Dingley, <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-reflective_coating>. |
“Monotonic function,” Wikipedia, accessed May 24, 2017, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotonic_function>. |
“Thin Film,” Wikipedia, last updated Jun. 20, 2017, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_film>. |
“Tips to Get Quality Anti-Reflection Optical Coatings,” Penn Optical Coatings, accessed May 24, 2017, <http://www.pennoc.com/tipsgetqualityantireflectionopticalcoatings/>. |
Langlet, M., “Antireflective Films”, from Chapter 15 of Handbook of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Processing Characterization and Applications, copyright 2005, pp. 332-334, 337, 339-341., taken from website <https://books.google.com/books?id=i9swy1D2HxIC&Ipg=PA339&dq=AR%20thick%20film%20coatings&pg=PA339#v=onepage&q=AR%20thick%20film%20coatings&f=false>. |
Li, H.-M. et al., “Influence of weight ratio in polymer blend film on the phase separation structure and its optical properties”, The European Physical Journal Applied Physics, 45, 20501, published Jan. 31, 2009, EDP Sciences, 4 pages. |
MDS Nordion, “Gamma Compatible Materials,” Datasheet, Aug. 2007, 4 pages, <https://ab-div-bdi-bl-blm.web.cern.ch/Radiation/Gamma_Compatible_Materials_List_company.pdf>, retrieved on Sep. 29, 2021. |
Zhang, Xin_Xiang et al., Abstract of “One-step sol-gel preparation of PDMS-silica ORMOSILs as environment-resistant and crack-free thick antireflective coatings,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, Issue 26, 2012, <http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2012/m/c2jm31005h#!divAbstract>. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/044438, dated Oct. 23, 2017, 12 pages. |
Chemical Book, “Benzophenone”, https://www.chemicalbook.com/Chemical ProductProperty_EN_CB57 44679.htm, available at least as of 2017, accessed on line on Dec. 15, 2021 (Year: 2017). |
Chemical Book, “Polymethylhydrosiloxane”, https://www.chemicalbook.com/Chemical ProductProperty _EN_ CB3694969. htm, available at least as of 2017, accessed online on Dec. 15, 2021 (Year: 2017). |
Guide Chem, “UV Stabilizer”, https://wap.guidechem.com/trade/uv-stabilizer-uv-absorber-ligh-id3578792.html, available at least as of 2018, accessed online on Dec. 15, 2021 (Year: 2018). |
Hostaphan RBB biaxially oriented film data sheet (Year: 2011). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/024639; Jun. 11, 2020. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/026165, dated Jul. 9, 2021, 10 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US21/20421, May 20, 2021, 8 pages. |
Wiseman, Sr., United States Statutory Invention Registration No. H1023, published Mar. 3, 1992, 7 pages. |
Chemical Book, Bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate, available online at least as of 2017, https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB8121619.htm, accessed online Mar. 15, 2022 (Year: 2017). |
Pearson Dental, “UV Protection Face Shields”, https://www.pearsondental.com/catalog/subcat_thumb.asp?majcatid=750&catid=l0149, available online at least as of Jan. 27, 2021 per Internet Archive, accessed online on Sep. 15, 2021. (Year: 2021). |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/031823, mailed Jul. 14, 2022, 11 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/046171, mailed Jan. 18, 2023, 15 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/012316, mailed Apr. 14, 2023, 11 pages. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/26598, mailed Sep. 12, 2023, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240151881 A1 | May 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 18167673 | Feb 2023 | US |
Child | 18315394 | US | |
Parent | 17386304 | Jul 2021 | US |
Child | 17655328 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 18315394 | May 2023 | US |
Child | 18408123 | US | |
Parent | 17655328 | Mar 2022 | US |
Child | 18167673 | US |