Low reflectance removable lens stack

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12140781
  • Patent Number
    12,140,781
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 9, 2024
    11 months ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 12, 2024
    a month ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Laminated Film LLC (Las Vegas, NV, US)
  • Examiners
    • Jones; James C.
    Agents
    • Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker
Abstract
A removable lens stack includes a base layer and one or more removable lens layers. The base layer may include a substrate and moth eye coatings on first and second sides of the substrate. A first removable lens layer may include a substrate and an acrylic or fluoropolymer coating on a first side of the substrate and may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer. A second removable lens layer may include a substrate and an acrylic or fluoropolymer coating on a first side of the substrate and may be stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer. The acrylic or fluoropolymer coating may comprise a hard coat.
Description
STATEMENT RE: FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable


BACKGROUND

In various environments where one uses protective eyewear such as goggles, visors, and face shields, it is important to maintain visibility as debris accumulates on the eyewear. For example, participants in off-road sports like motocross racing need to maintain visibility of the course as mud, bugs, and other debris accumulate on their goggles or helmet visor. Similarly, in an operating room environment, splatter can impair the view of surgeons or other operating personnel during a procedure. In response to these needs, tearoff films are commonly employed, either individually or in laminated stacks, which are applied to the goggle lens, visor, or face shield. As debris accumulates on the outermost tearoff film or the outermost tearoff film becomes damaged, the wearer simply tears it off to reveal the next pristine film underneath.


In order to ensure visual acuity through such stacked lenses, it is desirable to minimize internal reflection. One promising technology for reducing reflection is so-called moth-eye (ME) coatings, which simulate the anti-reflective properties of a moth's eye by providing a pattern of microscopic bumps that effectively eliminate the index of refraction interface between the lens and the air. Unfortunately, in the case of a stack of lenses, the adhesives used between the layers have a tendency to fill in around the bumps of the ME coating, drastically increasing the peel strength of each layer (making it 650 to 1,070 grams/inch, for example) and thus making the stack unusable as the layers cannot easily be torn off and the force to remove a layer may be greater than the tensile strength of the lens material.


BRIEF SUMMARY

The present disclosure contemplates various devices and methods for overcoming the drawbacks accompanying the related art. One aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack. The removable lens stack may comprise a base layer including a substrate having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, the base layer further including a moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate. The removable lens stack may further comprise one or more removable lens layers, each removable lens layer including a substrate having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, a moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate, and a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate. The one or more removable lens layers may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of each removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of an immediately preceding layer from among the base layer and the one or more removable lens layers. Each of the fluoropolymer coatings may be molded to fit the moth eye coating of the immediately preceding layer.


In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the moth eye coating may comprise a polymer.


In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the moth eye coating may define a pattern of bumps with half-wave pitch.


In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the moth eye coating may define a pattern of bumps with half-wave height.


In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the moth eye coating may define a pattern of cones.


The base layer may further include a moth eye coating on the second side of the substrate.


In each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, the substrate may comprise polyethylene terephthalate (PET).


The removable lens stack may comprise, in each of the one or more removable lens layers and the base layer, an adhesion treatment between the substrate and the moth eye coating. The adhesion treatment may comprise a pressure sensitive adhesive.


The removable lens stack may comprise, in each of the one or more removable lens layers, an adhesion treatment between the substrate and the fluoropolymer coating. The adhesion treatment may comprise a pressure sensitive adhesive.


A peel strength of each of the one or more removable lens layers may be less than 100 grams per inch. A peel strength of each of the one or more removable lens layers may be between 15 and 50 grams per inch and may, more particularly, be between 15 and 30 grams per inch.


A visible light transmission (VLT) of the removable lens stack may be greater than 95% and may, more particularly, be greater than 98%.


Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a method of manufacturing a removable lens stack. The method may comprise providing a base layer including a substrate having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, the base layer further including a moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate. The method may further comprise stacking one or more removable lens layers on top of the base layer, each removable lens layer including a substrate having a first side and a second side opposite the first side, a moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate, and a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate. The one or more removable lens layers may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of each removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of an immediately preceding layer from among the base layer and the one or more removable lens layers. The method may further comprise laminating the stacked one or more removable lens layers to the base layer, each of the fluoropolymer coatings being molded to fit the moth eye coating of the immediately preceding layer.


The laminating may comprise laminating the stacked one or more removable lens layers to the base layer under pressure at a temperature less than 40° C.


The method may comprise, in each of the one or more removable lens layers, applying a corona treatment between the substrate and the moth eye coating.


The method may comprise, in each of the one or more removable lens layers, applying a corona treatment between the substrate and the fluoropolymer coating.


Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack comprising a base layer, a first removable lens layer, and a second removable lens layer. The base layer may include a substrate and a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate. The first removable lens layer may include a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and a fluoropolymer coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating. The second removable lens layer may include a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The second removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.


The moth eye coating may comprise a polymer. The moth eye coating may define a pattern of bumps with half-wave pitch. The moth eye coating may define a pattern of bumps with half-wave height. The moth eye coating may define a pattern of cones.


The base layer may include a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side.


In each of the base layer, the first removable lens layer, and the second removable lens layer, the substrate may comprise polyethylene terephthalate (PET).


The removable lens stack may further comprise a third removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The third removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the second removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the third removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer. The removable lens stack may further comprise a fourth removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The fourth layer may be stacked on top of the third removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the fourth removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the third removable lens layer.


A peel strength of the first removable lens layer may be less than 100 grams per inch. The peel strength of the first removable lens layer may be between 15 and 50 grams per inch. The peel strength of the first removable lens layer may be between 15 and 30 grams per inch.


A visible light transmission (VLT) of the removable lens stack may be greater than 95%. The VLT of the removable lens stack may be greater than 98%.


Another aspect of the present disclosure is a method of manufacturing a removable lens stack. The method may comprise providing a base layer including a substrate and a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate and stacking a first removable lens layer on top of the base layer, the first removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and a fluoropolymer coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The method may further comprise laminating the stacked first removable lens layer to the base layer, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating. The method may further comprise stacking a second removable lens layer on top of the first removable lens layer, the second removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.


The laminating may comprise laminating the stacked first removable lens layer to the base layer under pressure at a temperature less than 40° C. The laminating may be performed prior to the stacking of the second removable lens layer on top of the first removable lens layer.


The method may further comprise applying a corona treatment between the substrate and the moth eye coating of the base layer and/or between the substrate and the fluoropolymer coating of the first removable lens layer.


The method may further comprise stacking a third removable lens layer on top of the second removable lens layer, the third removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The third removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the second removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the third removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer. The method may further comprise stacking a fourth removable lens layer on top of the third removable lens layer, the fourth removable lens layer including a substrate, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The fourth removable lens layer may be stacked on top of the third removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the fourth removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the third removable lens layer.


Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack comprising a base layer, a first removable lens layer, and a second removable lens layer. The base layer may include a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may include a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The second removable lens layer may include a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.


The acrylic coating of each of the first and second removable lens layers may comprise an acrylic hard coat. The acrylic hard coat may contain silica beads. The first removable lens layer may include a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The second removable lens layer may include an acrylic adhesive on the second side of the substrate. The second removable lens layer may include a polyurethane adhesive on the second side of the substrate.


Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack comprising a base layer and a first removable lens layer. The base layer may include a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may include a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer.


The acrylic coating may comprise an acrylic hard coat. The acrylic hard coat may contain silica beads. The first removable lens layer may include a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The removable lens stack may comprise a second removable lens layer including a substrate, an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer. The removable lens stack may comprise a second removable lens layer including a substrate, an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, and a polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.


Another aspect of the embodiments of the present disclosure is a removable lens stack comprising a base layer and a first removable lens layer. The base layer may include a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side. The first removable lens layer may include a substrate and a fluoropolymer coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer.


The fluoropolymer coating of the first removable lens layer may comprise a fluoropolymer hard coat. The fluoropolymer hard coat may contain silica beads. The first removable lens layer may include a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer. The removable lens stack may comprise a second removable lens layer including a substrate and a fluoropolymer coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer. The second removable lens layer may include an acrylic adhesive on the second side of the substrate. The second removable lens layer may include a polyurethane adhesive on the second side of the substrate. The fluoropolymer coating of the second removable lens layer may comprise a fluoropolymer hard coat.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features and advantages of the various embodiments disclosed herein will be better understood with respect to the following description and drawings, in which like numbers refer to like parts throughout, and in which:



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a base layer and two removable lens layers of a removable lens stack according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the removable lens stack having the layers of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a base layer and removable lens layers of a removable lens stack according to another embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the removable lens stack having the layers of FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a base layer and removable lens layers of a removable lens stack according to another embodiment of the present disclosure; and



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of the removable lens stack having the layers of FIG. 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure encompasses various embodiments of removable lens stacks and manufacturing methods thereof. The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of several currently contemplated embodiments and is not intended to represent the only form in which the disclosed invention may be developed or utilized. The description sets forth the functions and features in connection with the illustrated embodiments. It is to be understood, however, that the same or equivalent functions may be accomplished by different embodiments that are also intended to be encompassed within the scope of the present disclosure. It is further understood that the use of relational terms such as first and second and the like are used solely to distinguish one from another entity without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities.



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a base layer 100 and two removable lens layers 200, which may be stacked together to form a removable lens stack 10 as shown in cross-section in FIG. 2. The base layer 100 of the removable lens stack 10 may be affixed to a surface such as a goggle lens or visor or a transparent window of a surgical helmet, hood, or gown, for example, or alternatively may be attached at a perimeter thereof to a frame such that the removable lens stack 10 itself serves as the lens, visor, face shield, etc. (i.e. without being affixed to a surface). In the example of FIGS. 1 and 2, two removable lens layers 200 are shown, which are stacked on the base layer 100 to form the removable lens stack 10. However, it is contemplated that there may be more than two removable lens layers 200 or that there may be only a single removable lens layer 200. As shown, each of the removable lens layers 200 may comprise a substrate 210 and a moth eye coating 220 on a first side 212 thereof. The base layer 100 may likewise comprise a substrate 110 and a moth eye coating 120a on a first side 112 thereof, as well as an optional moth eye coating 120b on a second side 114 opposite the first side 112. Owing to the moth eye coatings 120a, 120b, 220, the removable lens stack 10 may have very low reflectance and, accordingly, may exhibit a visible light transmission (VLT) of greater than 95% or in some cases greater than 98% (e.g. >99% with reflections sub 1%).


Unlike conventional removable lenses, each removable lens layer 200 may additionally comprise a fluoropolymer coating 230 on a second side 214 of the substrate 210 opposite the first side 212. As such, when the removable lens layer(s) 200 are stacked on top of the base layer 100 with the second side 214 of each substrate 210 facing the first side 112, 212 of the immediately preceding substrate 110, 210 (which may be the substrate 210 of an immediately preceding removable lens layer 200 or the substrate 110 of the base layer 100 as the case may be), the fluoropolymer coating(s) 230 may abut the moth eye coatings 120a, 220. Upon laminating the stacked removable lens layer(s) 200 to the base layer 100, each fluoropolymer coating 230 may thus be molded to fit the moth eye coating 120a, 220 of the immediately preceding layer 100, 200. The resulting mechanical interlocking of the moth eye coatings 120a, 220 with the molded female patterns corresponding thereto formed in the adjacent fluoropolymer coatings 230 may function similarly to a zipper to fix the adjacent layers together. Owing to this mechanical interlocking, the use of an acrylic or other tacky adhesive on the moth eye coating 120a, 220 may be entirely avoided, preventing the increased peel strength associated with such conventional adhesives collecting around the bumps of the moth eye coating 120a, 220. Thus, the removable lens layer(s) 200 may advantageously have a much lower peel strength, which may be less than 100 grams per inch and may, for example, be between 15 and 50 grams per inch or more particularly between 15 and 30 grams per inch (e.g. 25 grams per inch), making it possible for the wearer to remove each layer 200 as desired with a reasonable amount of pulling force. (It is noted that the use of a tacky adhesive to affix the base layer 100 to a surface may not present a problem since the base layer 100 need not be removable and thus an increased peel strength caused by buildup of adhesive around the bumps of the optional moth eye coating 120b may be acceptable.)


The substrate 110, 210 of each layer 100, 200 may comprise a transparent polymer such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and may be 1 to 10 mil thick, for example, around 2 mil thick for the substrate 210 of each removable lens layer 200 with the substrate 110 of the base layer 100 being the same thickness or typically thicker (e.g. 7 mil). The moth eye coating 220 of each of the removable lens layers 200, as well as the moth eye coating(s) 120a, 120b of the base layer 100, may comprise a polymer and may typically be made of a hard polymer such as glassy carbon having a Mohs hardness of 7, for example. The moth eye coating 120a, 120b, 220 may define a pattern of nano sized micro-projections or bumps (e.g. transparent cones) on the surface of the substrate 110, 210 with dimensions on the order of the wavelength of light (e.g. visible light), such as half-wave pitch and/or half-wave height, to produce the antireflective effect. For example, the pitch and/or height of the bumps may be 200-375 nm. Various shapes are possible for the bumps of the moth eye coating 120a, 120b, 220, including rounded or rectangular raised surfaces instead of cones, for example.


The moth eye coating 120a, 120b, 220 may be refractive index matched (e.g. to within 0.2) with the substrates 110, 210 and with the fluoropolymer coating(s) 230, as well as with any adhesives that may be used (as described below), such that the entire removable lens stack 10 may have a consistent index of refraction (e.g. within 0.2). However, because the refractive index interface between the air and the removable lens stack 10 may be effectively eliminated by the outermost moth eye coating 220 (as the interface appears like a gradient rather than a sudden change in material from the perspective of incident light), it is not necessary to index match the removable lens stack 10 to air (n=1). Therefore, it is contemplated that a wide variety of materials may be used for the substrates 110, 210 and other components of the removable lens stack 10.


In general, when building a conventional removable lens stack, a removable bonding material is used to wet each pair of adjacent surfaces together. The term “wetting,” in this context, may refer to when two surfaces come in such close contact with each other that the contact displaces all of the air in between the two surfaces, allowing for good bonding. Whereas simply laying one lens on top of another lens does not disperse the air trapped between the lenses, an acrylic removable adhesive may be used to wet the surfaces together and promote bonding. By matching the refractive index of the adhesive with the refractive index(es) of the lenses (e.g. to within 0.2), visible light may stay at a constant speed at the interfaces, minimizing reflections. An example of such a system may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 9,295,297, entitled “Adhesive Mountable Stack of Removable Layers,” the entire contents of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein. However, because adhesive is tacky to the touch, issues arise when bonding two surfaces together where one or both surfaces have a moth eye coating. In particular, as described above, the adhesive fills in around the micro-projections of the moth eye coating, drastically increasing the peel strength beyond what is functionally suitable for a removable lens stack.


Therefore, in order to wet the surfaces of the substrates 110, 210 together and achieve the preferred peel strength in the disclosed removable lens stack 10, the fluoropolymer coating(s) 230 may be provided on the second side 214 of each substrate 210. The fluoropolymer coating 230 may be an index-matched (e.g. to within 0.2) soft fluoropolymer such as fluorinated ethylene-propylene copolymer (FEP), perfluoroalkoxy alkane (PFA), or tetrafluoroethylene perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether) (MFA) that is not tacky to the touch but is moldable under laminating pressure to produce a debossed (female) pattern corresponding to the bumps of the abutting moth eye coating 120a, 220.


In some cases, an adhesion treatment 140a, 240 may be provided between the substrate 110 and moth eye coating 120a of the base layer 100 and/or between the substrate 210 and moth eye coating 220 of each removable lens layer 200. Likewise, if the substrate 110 of the base layer 100 further includes a moth eye coating 120b on the second side 114 thereof, an adhesion treatment 140b may be provided between the substrate 110 and the moth eye coating 120b. In each removable lens layer 200, an adhesion treatment 250 may similarly be provided between the substrate 210 and the fluoropolymer coating 230. The adhesion treatments 140a, 140b, 240, 250 may comprise a pressure sensitive adhesive such as a silicone adhesive (e.g. a polydimethyl/methylvinyl siloxane polymer and resin dispersed in toluene/isopropyl alcohol such as an adhesive sold under the name DOWSIL™ 7655 Adhesive or DOWSIL™ 7656 Adhesive by the Dow Chemical Company). The adhesive may be index matched (e.g. to within 0.2) with the substrates 110, 210 and other elements of the removable lens stack 10 as noted above.


The base layer 100 and one or more removable lens layers 200 may be manufactured by coating each substrate 110, 210 with the moth eye coating(s) 120a, 120b, 220 and fluoropolymer coating 230, which may in some cases be adhered to the substrates 110, 210 by adhesion treatments 140a, 140b, 240, 250 as described above. In order to improve adhesion, it is also contemplated that a corona treatment may be applied between the substrate 110, 210 and the moth eye coating 120a, 120b, 220, and/or between the substrate 210 and the fluoropolymer coating 220. This may ensure that the fluoropolymer coating 220 remains with the outermost removable lens layer 200 as it is pulled off the removable lens stack 10, for example. The corona treatment may be applied instead of or in addition to the above-described adhesion treatments 140a, 140b, 240, 250. The removable lens layer(s) 200 may then be stacked on top of the base layer 100 such that the second side 214 of the substrate 210 of each removable lens layer 200 faces the first side 112, 212 of the substrate 110, 210 of an immediately preceding layer from among the base layer 100 and the one or more removable lens layers 200 (as the case may be). In the illustrated example shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, a first removable lens layer 200 (shown in the center of each figure) is stacked on the base layer 100 and a second removable lens layer 200 (shown in the left-hand side of each figure) is stacked on the first removable lens layer 200. Additional removable lens layers 200 may similarly be provided and added to the stack.


The removable lens layer(s) 200 may then be laminated to the base layer 100 under pressure with or without heat, for example, under pressure at a temperature less than 40° C. It should be noted that the base layer 100 and removable lens layer(s) 200 may be laminated together in a single lamination process or in multiple lamination processes, for example, with each removable lens layer 200 added to the stack in a separate lamination process (or with multiple removable lens layers 200 being laminated together before being laminated to the base layer 100). As a result of the lamination, each fluoropolymer coating 230 may be molded to fit the moth eye coating 120a, 220 of the immediately preceding layer. In particular, the hard bumps of the moth eye coating 120a, 220 may press into the soft fluoropolymer coating 230 to produce the corresponding debossed (female) pattern in the fluoropolymer coating 230. In this way, the above-described mechanical interlocking between the layers 100, 200 may be achieved to produce the desired peel strength (e.g. 25 grams per inch) without the use of tacky adhesives between the layers 100, 200 that might otherwise fill in between the bumps and increase the peel strength too much. At the same time, the air between the layers 100, 200 may be expelled during the laminating process, allowing for wetting of the opposing layers 100, 200 (and slight adhesion as a result), while the refractive index interface may be effectively eliminated due to the index gradient created by the architecture of the moth eye coatings 120a, 220. The resulting visible light transmission (VLT) of the removable lens stack 10 may be greater than 95% (e.g. 96% with 4% reflection), as opposed to 92% with 8% reflection that might be found in an uncoated lens. In some cases, the VLT may be greater than 98% (e.g. >99%), especially when the moth eye coating 120b is provided so that there are moth eye coatings 120a, 120b, 220 on both sides of the stack 10.


When the removable lens stack 10 is incorporated into eyewear and being worn, the wearer may easily peel off the outermost removable lens layer 200 to reveal an unblemished removable lens layer 200 (or the base layer 100) underneath. In the case of a removable lens stack 10 having multiple removable lens layers 200, the pulling force used to remove the outermost removable lens layer 200 may generally involve an initial outward force (perpendicular to the stack 10) as the wearer lifts the outermost removable lens layer 200 off the stack 10 on one side to separate it from the other removable lens layers 200 (e.g. by grasping an easily accessible tab on one side of the stack 10), followed by a continuous sideways force (with a component parallel to the stack 10) as the wearer peels the outermost removable lens layer 200 off. It is contemplated that the continuous sideways force that is responsible for the majority of the separation of the removable lens layers 200 may have more of a tendency to lift off the outermost removable lens layer 200 than to separate subsequent layers 200 underneath. Therefore, the wearer can readily peel off one layer 200 at a time without accidentally tearing off additional layers 200 of the removable lens stack 10.


Hybrid stacks are also contemplated, in which one or more layers having moth eye coatings may be combined with one or more layers having alternative types of antireflective coatings such as single or multi-layer interference antireflective coatings. By way of example, FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the same base layer 100 as in FIG. 1 but this time with a removable lens layer 300 and two removable lens layers 400, which may be stacked together to form a removable lens stack 20 as shown in cross-section in FIG. 4. The base layer 100 of the removable lens stack 20 may be the same as that of the removable lens stack 10 as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 and may similarly be affixed to a surface such as a goggle lens or visor or a transparent window of a surgical helmet, hood, or gown, for example, or alternatively may be attached at a perimeter thereof to a frame such that the removable lens stack 20 itself serves as the lens, visor, face shield, etc. Advantageously, the removable lens stack 20 employs moth eye coating in some but not all layers, reducing the difficulty and expense associated with producing moth eye coating. In the illustrated embodiment, for example, the base layer 100 is the only layer to have moth eye coating, with removable lens layers 300, 400 instead having single or multi-layer interference antireflective coatings 340, 440 that may be less expensive to produce (e.g., by spin coating, dip coating, or vacuum deposition). In particular, a first removable lens layer 300 may include a substrate 310, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating 340 on a first side 312 of the substrate 310, and a fluoropolymer coating 330 on a second side 314 of the substrate 310 opposite the first side 312 (with optional adhesion treatment 350). With the first removable lens layer 300 stacked on top of the base layer 100 and the second side 314 of the substrate 310 facing the first side 112 of the substrate 110 of the base layer 100, the fluoropolymer coating 330 may be molded to fit the moth eye coating 120a as described above.


One or more additional removable lens layers 400 may also be added to the stack, each including a substrate 410, a single or multi-layer interference antireflective coating 440 on a first side 412, and an adhesive 450 such as an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side 414. One such removable lens layer 400 may be stacked on the removable lens layer 300 such that the second side 414 of the substrate 410 faces the first side 312 of the substrate 300. Further removable lens layers 400 may be stacked thereon, with the second side 414 of each substrate 410 facing the first side 412 of each preceding substrate 400. By using an antireflective coating 340, 440 that does not have bumps like the moth eye coating 120a, any concern about the adhesive 450 filling in around the bumps and undesirably increasing the peel strength can be avoided. As a result, various kinds of adhesive 450 may be used including an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive such as a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), which may adhere (e.g., with the application of pressure) to the antireflective coating 340, 440 of the preceding layer 300, 400. The hybrid removable lens stack 20 may effectively achieve the superior antireflective properties of moth eye by incorporating it in one or more layers while at the same time benefiting from one or more layers having less expensive antireflective coatings 340, 440 and/or adhesives 450. The hybrid removable lens stack 20 may thus represent a “best of both worlds” compromise that balances the need for a high degree of antireflection with the manufacturing costs.


In the example of FIGS. 3 and 4, one removable lens layer 300 (having a non-ME AR coating 340 and a fluoropolymer coating 330 to interface with the moth eye coating 120a of the base layer 100) and two removable lens layers 400 (having a non-ME AR coating 440 and an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive 450) are shown, which are stacked on the base layer 100 to form the removable lens stack 20. However, hybrid stacks of various other combinations of layers are also contemplated. For example, more or fewer removable lens layers 400 may be used. Also, one or more removable lens layers 200 (see FIGS. 1 and 2) may be added between the base layer 100 and the removable lens layer 300, In this case, the fluoropolymer coating 330 of the removable lens layer 300 may interface with the moth eye coating 220 of the outermost removable lens layer 200 instead of directly with the moth eye coating 120a of the base layer 100. Alternatively, substrates with moth eye coating(s) may be incorporated farther outward in the stack with one or more substrates having non-ME AR coating(s) underneath. To this end a modified layer 400 may be used having a moth eye coating in place of the non-ME AR coating 440 (but with the acrylic or polyurethane adhesive 450 still being used to interface with a non-ME AR coating underneath). Hybrid removable lens stacks 20 of various configurations may be economically designed and produced in accordance with the particular needs of the manufacturer and consumer, both in terms of the degree of antireflection required and the desired unit cost.


It should also be noted that the use of moth eye coatings on both sides of a single layer (i.e., forward and rear facing moth-eye patterns) is not necessarily limited to the base layer 100. Either of the removable lens stacks 10, 20 may include such double-sided moth-eye layers at any position in the stack. For example, the stack may consist of multiple layers 100 stacked on top of each other (which may in some cases be the only type of layer in the stack such as a stack consisting of three layers 100). Between each pair of adjacent layers 100, a fluoropolymer coating may be applied that may mold to the shape of the moth-eye coating as described above, except that in this case the fluoropolymer coating may mold to the shapes of two moth-eye coatings that face each other with the fluoropolymer coating therebetween. As one example method of stacking multiple such double-sided moth-eye layers 100, the fluoropolymer coating may be coated on the forward-facing moth-eye coating 120a of a first layer 100, causing one side of the fluoropolymer coating to mold to the shape of the forward-facing moth-eye coating 120a, and then a second layer 100 may be stacked on the fluoropolymer coating and laminated, causing the other side of the fluoropolymer coating to mold to the shape of the rear-facing moth-eye coating 120b of the second layer 100. Stacking of further layers 100 can continue in the same way (or in combination with other types of layers as described above), with the fluoropolymer coating being molded to the shapes of two adjacent moth-eye coatings wherever necessary. Preferably, a release treatment may be applied to each forward-facing moth-eye coating 120a, and/or an adhesion promoting treatment may be applied to each rear-facing moth-eye coating 120b, thus encouraging the fluoropolymer coating to come off with each layer 100 as it is removed from the stack. By using double-sided moth-eye layers in this way, a high degree of antireflection can be achieved. Moreover, depending on the moth-eye fabrication processes used, producing two moth-eye coatings 120a, 120b on the same substrate 110 may be more cost effective than producing individual moth-eye coatings on separate substrates, making the use of double-sided moth-eye layers potentially more efficient. Manufacturing processes may also be simplified (and costs reduced) by the use of the same repeated layer 100 in place of multiple different layers.


Given the very low reflectance that may be achievable using a base layer 100 having a forward-facing moth-eye coating 120a and/or a rear-facing moth-eye coating 120b, it is contemplated that a stack having an acceptable degree of antireflection may be achieved without necessarily requiring moth-eye or single or multi-layer interference anti-reflective coatings on the removable layers. In particular, it has been found that an acrylic coating, such as an acrylic coating of a hard coat applied to a PET substrate, may increase the smoothness of the outer surface of the substrate (which may have been roughened during production for ease of handling), thus lowering haze, while the lower refractive index of the acrylic coating in comparison to the PET substrate reduces reflection making the stack more anti-reflective. It has similarly been found that a fluoropolymer coating (e.g., silicone or Teflon), such as a fluoropolymer coating of a hard coat applied to a PET substrate, may likewise increase the smoothness of the outer surface and lower haze while similarly making the stack more anti-reflective due to the difference in refractive index. In combination with moth-eye coating(s) 120a, 120b on a base layer 100, such a stack including acrylic or fluoropolymer coatings on the removable layers may strike a balance between quality and cost-effectiveness. In addition, the acrylic or fluoropolymer coating may advantageously comprise an acrylic or fluoropolymer hard coat, which may contain silica beads, for example. In this way, the contemplated coatings may provide the functionality of a hard coat (e.g., increased scratch resistance) in addition to providing the anti-reflective effect.


Referring to FIG. 5, a cross-sectional view is shown of the same base layer 100 as in FIG. 1 but this time with a removable lens layer 500 and a removable lens layer 600, which may be stacked together to form a removable lens stack 30 as shown in cross-section in FIG. 6. The base layer 100 of the removable lens stack 30 may be the same as that of the removable lens stack 10 as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 and may similarly be affixed to a surface such as a goggle lens or visor or a transparent window of a surgical helmet, hood, or gown, for example, or alternatively may be attached at a perimeter thereof to a frame such that the removable lens stack 30 itself serves as the lens, visor, face shield, etc. Like the removable lens stack 20, the removable lens stack 30 advantageously may employ moth eye coating in some but not all layers, reducing the difficulty and expense associated with producing moth eye coating. In the illustrated embodiment, for example, the base layer 100 is the only layer to have moth eye coating, with removable lens layers 500, 600 instead having an acrylic or fluoropolymer coating 540, 640 (e.g., a hard coat) that may be less expensive to produce than a moth eye coating, such as by spin coating, dip coating, or vacuum deposition. In particular, a first removable lens layer 500 may include a substrate 510, an acrylic or fluoropolymer coating 540 (e.g., a hard coat) on a first side 512 of the substrate 510, and a fluoropolymer coating 530 on a second side 514 of the substrate 510 opposite the first side 512 (with optional adhesion treatment 550). With the first removable lens layer 500 stacked on top of the base layer 100 and the second side 514 of the substrate 510 facing the first side 112 of the substrate 110 of the base layer 100, the fluoropolymer coating 530 may be molded to fit the moth eye coating 120a as described above.


One or more additional removable lens layers 600 may also be added to the stack, each including a substrate 610, an acrylic or fluoropolymer coating 640 (e.g., a hard coat) on a first side 612, and an adhesive 650 such as an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive on a second side 614. One such removable lens layer 600 may be stacked on the removable lens layer 500 such that the second side 614 of the substrate 610 faces the first side 512 of the substrate 500. While not specifically illustrated, further removable lens layers 600 may be stacked thereon, with the second side 614 of each substrate 610 facing the first side 612 of each preceding substrate 600. By using an acrylic or fluoropolymer coating 540, 640 (which does not have bumps like the moth eye coating 120a) in place of a conventional anti-reflective coating, any concern about the adhesive 650 filling in around the bumps and undesirably increasing the peel strength can be avoided. As a result, various kinds of adhesive 650 may be used including an acrylic or polyurethane adhesive such as a pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA), which may adhere (e.g., with the application of pressure) to the acrylic or fluoropolymer coating 540, 640 (e.g., hard coat) of the preceding layer 500, 600. The hybrid removable lens stack 30 may effectively achieve the superior antireflective properties of moth eye by incorporating it in one or more layers while at the same time benefiting from one or more layers having less expensive coatings 540, 640 and/or adhesives 550, with the coatings 540, 640 in some cases serving a dual purpose of providing adequate antireflective properties as well as hard coat functionality.


The above description is given by way of example, and not limitation. Given the above disclosure, one skilled in the art could devise variations that are within the scope and spirit of the invention disclosed herein. Further, the various features of the embodiments disclosed herein can be used alone, or in varying combinations with each other and are not intended to be limited to the specific combination described herein. Thus, the scope of the claims is not to be limited by the illustrated embodiments.

Claims
  • 1. A removable lens stack comprising: a base layer including a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side;a first removable lens layer including a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer; anda second removable lens layer including a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.
  • 2. The removable lens stack of claim 1, wherein the acrylic coating of each of the first and second removable lens layers comprises an acrylic hard coat.
  • 3. The removable lens stack of claim 2, wherein the acrylic hard coat contains silica beads.
  • 4. The removable lens stack of claim 1, wherein the first removable lens layer further includes a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer.
  • 5. The removable lens stack of claim 1, wherein the second removable lens layer further includes an acrylic adhesive on the second side of the substrate.
  • 6. The removable lens stack of claim 1, wherein the second removable lens layer further includes a polyurethane adhesive on the second side of the substrate.
  • 7. A removable lens stack comprising: a base layer including a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side; anda first removable lens layer including a substrate and an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer.
  • 8. The removable lens stack of claim 7, wherein the acrylic coating comprises an acrylic hard coat.
  • 9. The removable lens stack of claim 8, wherein the acrylic hard coat contains silica beads.
  • 10. The removable lens stack of claim 7, wherein the first removable lens layer further includes a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer.
  • 11. The removable lens stack of claim 7, further comprising a second removable lens layer including a substrate, an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, and an acrylic adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.
  • 12. The removable lens stack of claim 7, further comprising a second removable lens layer including a substrate, an acrylic coating on a first side of the substrate, and a polyurethane adhesive on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.
  • 13. A removable lens stack comprising: a base layer including a substrate, a moth eye coating on a first side of the substrate, and a moth eye coating on a second side of the substrate opposite the first side; anda first removable lens layer including a substrate and a fluoropolymer coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the first removable lens layer being stacked on top of the base layer such that the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the base layer.
  • 14. The removable lens stack of claim 13, wherein the fluoropolymer coating of the first removable lens layer comprises a fluoropolymer hard coat.
  • 15. The removable lens stack of claim 14, wherein the fluoropolymer hard coat contains silica beads.
  • 16. The removable lens stack of claim 13, wherein the first removable lens layer further includes a fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate, the fluoropolymer coating on the second side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer being molded to fit the moth eye coating on the first side of the substrate of the base layer.
  • 17. The removable lens stack of claim 13, further comprising a second removable lens layer including a substrate and a fluoropolymer coating on a first side of the substrate, the substrate having a second side opposite the first side, the second removable lens layer being stacked on top of the first removable lens layer such that the second side of the substrate of the second removable lens layer faces the first side of the substrate of the first removable lens layer.
  • 18. The removable lens stack of claim 17, wherein the second removable lens layer further includes an acrylic adhesive on the second side of the substrate.
  • 19. The removable lens stack of claim 17, wherein the second removable lens layer further includes a polyurethane adhesive on the second side of the substrate.
  • 20. The removable lens stack of claim 17, wherein the fluoropolymer coating of the second removable lens layer comprises a fluoropolymer hard coat.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 18/315,394, filed May 10, 2023, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 18/167,673, filed Feb. 10, 2023, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,709,296, issued Jul. 25, 2023, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/655,328, filed Mar. 17, 2022, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,624,859, issued Apr. 11, 2023, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/386,304, filed Jul. 27, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,307,329, issued Apr. 19, 2022, the contents of each of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (538)
Number Name Date Kind
1337036 Bergmann Apr 1920 A
1366907 Dunand Feb 1921 A
2138086 Blodjer Nov 1938 A
2248331 Blodjer Jul 1941 A
2328687 Serr Sep 1943 A
2339280 Harold Jan 1944 A
2354415 Woodard Jul 1944 A
2461604 Huntsman Feb 1949 A
2511329 Craig Jun 1950 A
2546117 Whelan Mar 1951 A
2563125 Malcom, Jr. Aug 1951 A
2569715 Green Oct 1951 A
2640068 Schaefer et al. May 1953 A
2736109 Scholl Feb 1956 A
2923944 Lindblom Feb 1960 A
2963708 Herbine et al. Dec 1960 A
3095575 Radov Jul 1963 A
3298031 Harold Jan 1967 A
3475766 Raschke Nov 1969 A
3577565 Feldmann et al. May 1971 A
3605115 Bohner Sep 1971 A
3685054 Raschke Aug 1972 A
3774239 Kotzar Nov 1973 A
3785102 Amos Jan 1974 A
3797042 Gager Mar 1974 A
3810815 Welhart et al. May 1974 A
3868293 Selph Feb 1975 A
3937863 Moore Feb 1976 A
3948662 Alston et al. Apr 1976 A
3950580 Boudet Apr 1976 A
3987569 Chase Oct 1976 A
4063740 Mader Dec 1977 A
4076373 Moretti Feb 1978 A
4090464 Bishopp et al. May 1978 A
D249597 Dillon Sep 1978 S
4138746 Bergmann Feb 1979 A
D254638 Bay, Jr. Apr 1980 S
4204231 Permenter May 1980 A
4248762 Hornibrook et al. Feb 1981 A
4248918 Hornibrook et al. Feb 1981 A
4268134 Gulati et al. May 1981 A
4273098 Silverstein Jun 1981 A
4301193 Zuk Nov 1981 A
4332861 Franz et al. Jun 1982 A
4333983 Allen Jun 1982 A
4380563 Ayotte Apr 1983 A
4528701 Smith Jul 1985 A
4557980 Hodnett, III Dec 1985 A
4582764 Allerd et al. Apr 1986 A
4625341 Broersma Dec 1986 A
4658515 Oatman Apr 1987 A
4696860 Epperson Sep 1987 A
4701965 Landis Oct 1987 A
4716601 Mcneal Jan 1988 A
4726074 Baclit et al. Feb 1988 A
4729179 Quist, Jr. Mar 1988 A
4769265 Coburn, Jr. Sep 1988 A
D299767 Hsin Feb 1989 S
4842919 David et al. Jun 1989 A
4850049 Landis et al. Jul 1989 A
4852185 Olson Aug 1989 A
4852186 Landis Aug 1989 A
4853974 Olim Aug 1989 A
4856535 Forbes Aug 1989 A
4864653 Landis Sep 1989 A
4867178 Smith Sep 1989 A
4884296 Nix, Jr. Dec 1989 A
4884302 Foehl Dec 1989 A
4889754 Vargas Dec 1989 A
D306363 Stackhouse et al. Feb 1990 S
4907090 Ananian Mar 1990 A
4911964 Corbo Mar 1990 A
D307065 Friedman Apr 1990 S
4920576 Landis May 1990 A
4934792 Tovi Jun 1990 A
4945573 Landis Aug 1990 A
4950445 Salce et al. Aug 1990 A
D311263 Russell Oct 1990 S
4964171 Landis Oct 1990 A
4965887 Paoluccio et al. Oct 1990 A
4973511 Farmer et al. Nov 1990 A
4975981 Ray Dec 1990 A
5000528 Kawakatsu Mar 1991 A
5002326 Spicer et al. Mar 1991 A
D318147 Russell Jul 1991 S
5035004 Koester Jul 1991 A
D319449 Millar Aug 1991 S
5046195 Koritan Sep 1991 A
D321268 Nix, Jr. Oct 1991 S
5052054 Birum Oct 1991 A
5054480 Bare et al. Oct 1991 A
5067475 Posnansky Nov 1991 A
5071206 Hood et al. Dec 1991 A
H1023 Wiseman Mar 1992 H
5104929 Bilkadi Apr 1992 A
5113528 Burke, Jr. et al. May 1992 A
D331820 Scanlon Dec 1992 S
D333366 Brown Feb 1993 S
5183700 Austin Feb 1993 A
5194293 Foster Mar 1993 A
5201077 Dondlinger Apr 1993 A
5206956 Olson May 1993 A
5208916 Kelman May 1993 A
5239406 Lynam Aug 1993 A
5318685 O'Shaughnessy Jun 1994 A
D349177 Russell Jul 1994 S
D349178 Russell Jul 1994 S
5327180 Hester, III et al. Jul 1994 A
D349362 Russell Aug 1994 S
5364671 Gustafson Nov 1994 A
5365615 Piszkin Nov 1994 A
D353691 Scanlon Dec 1994 S
D354588 Russell Jan 1995 S
D354589 Russell Jan 1995 S
5420649 Lewis May 1995 A
D359586 Lofton Jun 1995 S
D361160 Russell Aug 1995 S
5443877 Kramer et al. Aug 1995 A
D362086 Russell Sep 1995 S
5468247 Matthai et al. Nov 1995 A
5471036 Sperbeck Nov 1995 A
5473778 Bell Dec 1995 A
5486883 Candido Jan 1996 A
5507332 McKinnon Apr 1996 A
5510173 Pass et al. Apr 1996 A
5512116 Campfield Apr 1996 A
5523132 Zhang et al. Jun 1996 A
RE35318 Warman Aug 1996 E
5544361 Fine et al. Aug 1996 A
5553608 Reese et al. Sep 1996 A
5555570 Bay Sep 1996 A
5557683 Eubanks Sep 1996 A
5584130 Perron Dec 1996 A
5592698 Woods Jan 1997 A
5593786 Parker et al. Jan 1997 A
5622580 Mannheim Apr 1997 A
5633049 Bilkadi et al. May 1997 A
5668612 Hung Sep 1997 A
5671483 Reuber Sep 1997 A
5673431 Batty Oct 1997 A
5687420 Chong Nov 1997 A
5694650 Hong Dec 1997 A
5702415 Matthai et al. Dec 1997 A
5709825 Shih Jan 1998 A
5740560 Muoio Apr 1998 A
5792535 Weder Aug 1998 A
5806102 Park Sep 1998 A
5815848 Jarvis Oct 1998 A
5819311 Lo Oct 1998 A
5846659 Hartmut et al. Dec 1998 A
D404849 Desy Jan 1999 S
5885704 Peiffer et al. Mar 1999 A
5896991 Hippely et al. Apr 1999 A
5924129 Gill Jul 1999 A
5937596 Leeuwenburgh et al. Aug 1999 A
5956175 Hojnowski Sep 1999 A
5972453 Akiwa et al. Oct 1999 A
5991072 Solyntjes et al. Nov 1999 A
5991081 Haaland et al. Nov 1999 A
5991930 Sorrentino Nov 1999 A
D418256 Caruana Dec 1999 S
6008299 Mcgrath et al. Dec 1999 A
6049419 Wheatley et al. Apr 2000 A
6085358 Cogan Jul 2000 A
6173447 Arnold Jan 2001 B1
6217099 Mckinney et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221112 Snider Apr 2001 B1
6237147 Brockman May 2001 B1
6250765 Murakami Jun 2001 B1
6305073 Badders Oct 2001 B1
6347401 Joyce Feb 2002 B1
6375865 Paulson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378133 Daikuzono Apr 2002 B1
6381750 Mangan May 2002 B1
6385776 Linday May 2002 B2
6388813 Wilson et al. May 2002 B1
6403005 Mientus et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416872 Maschwitz Jul 2002 B1
6432522 Friedman et al. Aug 2002 B1
6461709 Janssen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469752 Ishikawa et al. Oct 2002 B1
6481019 Diaz et al. Nov 2002 B2
6491390 Provost Dec 2002 B1
6531180 Takushima et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536045 Wilson et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536589 Chang Mar 2003 B2
6555235 Aufderheide et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559902 Kusuda et al. May 2003 B1
6576349 Lingle et al. Jun 2003 B2
6584614 Hogg Jul 2003 B2
6592950 Toshima et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614423 Wong et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622311 Diaz et al. Sep 2003 B2
D480838 Martin Oct 2003 S
6654071 Chen Nov 2003 B2
6660389 Liu et al. Dec 2003 B2
6662371 Shin Dec 2003 B2
6667738 Murphy Dec 2003 B2
6739718 Jung May 2004 B1
6745396 Landis et al. Jun 2004 B1
6750922 Benning Jun 2004 B1
6773778 Onozawa et al. Aug 2004 B2
6773816 Tsutsumi Aug 2004 B2
6777055 Janssen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6800378 Hawa et al. Oct 2004 B2
6838610 De Moraes Jan 2005 B2
6841190 Liu et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847492 Wilson et al. Jan 2005 B2
6864882 Newton Mar 2005 B2
6870686 Wilson et al. Mar 2005 B2
6879319 Cok Apr 2005 B2
6907617 Johnson Jun 2005 B2
6911593 Mazumder et al. Jun 2005 B2
6922850 Arnold Aug 2005 B1
6952950 Doe et al. Oct 2005 B2
6967044 O'Brien Nov 2005 B1
D512797 Canavan et al. Dec 2005 S
6973677 Diaz et al. Dec 2005 B2
6995976 Richardson Feb 2006 B2
7070837 Ross Jul 2006 B2
7071927 Blanchard Jul 2006 B2
D526446 Cowan et al. Aug 2006 S
7097080 Cox Aug 2006 B2
7101810 Bond et al. Sep 2006 B2
7103920 Otterson Sep 2006 B1
7143979 Wood et al. Dec 2006 B2
7184217 Wilson et al. Feb 2007 B2
D541991 Lawrence May 2007 S
7215473 Fleming May 2007 B2
7226176 Huang Jun 2007 B1
7238401 Dietz Jul 2007 B1
7311956 Pitzen Dec 2007 B2
D559442 Regelbrugge et al. Jan 2008 S
7344241 Baek Mar 2008 B2
7351470 Draheim et al. Apr 2008 B2
D569557 Cho May 2008 S
7389869 Mason, Jr. Jun 2008 B2
7410684 Mccormick Aug 2008 B2
7425369 Oakey et al. Sep 2008 B2
D586052 Elias Feb 2009 S
7495895 Carnevali Feb 2009 B2
7597441 Farwig Oct 2009 B1
7629052 Brumwell Dec 2009 B2
7631365 Mahan Dec 2009 B1
7663047 Hanuschak Feb 2010 B2
7709095 Persoone et al. May 2010 B2
7722921 Shimoda et al. May 2010 B2
7727615 Kato et al. Jun 2010 B2
7735156 VanDerWoude et al. Jun 2010 B2
7752682 Vanderwoude et al. Jul 2010 B2
7812077 Borade et al. Oct 2010 B2
7858001 Qin et al. Dec 2010 B2
7937775 Manzella, Jr. et al. May 2011 B2
7957524 Chipping Jun 2011 B2
8024818 Davenport Sep 2011 B1
8044942 Leonhard et al. Oct 2011 B1
8101277 Logan et al. Jan 2012 B2
8234722 VanDerWoude et al. Aug 2012 B2
8261375 Reaux Sep 2012 B1
8282234 VanDerWoude et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292347 Drake Oct 2012 B1
8294843 Hollaway Oct 2012 B2
8316470 McNeal et al. Nov 2012 B2
8361260 Wilson et al. Jan 2013 B2
8407818 VanDerWoude et al. Apr 2013 B2
D683077 Klotz et al. May 2013 S
8455105 Hobeika et al. Jun 2013 B2
D692187 Isobe Oct 2013 S
D692189 Isobe Oct 2013 S
8567596 Mason, Jr. Oct 2013 B1
8693102 Wilson et al. Apr 2014 B2
8819869 VanDerWoude et al. Sep 2014 B2
8889801 Liao et al. Nov 2014 B2
8918198 Atanasoff Dec 2014 B2
8974620 Wilson et al. Mar 2015 B2
D726378 Wako Apr 2015 S
8999509 Port et al. Apr 2015 B2
9023162 Mccormick et al. May 2015 B2
9104256 Wilson et al. Aug 2015 B2
9128545 Wilson et al. Sep 2015 B2
9150763 Lopez et al. Oct 2015 B2
9161858 Capers et al. Oct 2015 B2
9170415 Mansuy Oct 2015 B2
9173437 VanDerWoude et al. Nov 2015 B2
9204823 Derenne et al. Dec 2015 B2
9274625 Wilson et al. Mar 2016 B2
9295297 Wilson Mar 2016 B2
D759900 Cummings et al. Jun 2016 S
9442306 Hines et al. Sep 2016 B1
9471163 Wilson et al. Oct 2016 B2
9526290 Wilson Dec 2016 B2
9575231 Chu et al. Feb 2017 B2
D781507 Huh Mar 2017 S
D781508 Huh Mar 2017 S
9629407 Foster Apr 2017 B2
9671622 Vetrini et al. Jun 2017 B1
9706808 Sclafani et al. Jul 2017 B2
9726940 Tomiyasu Aug 2017 B2
D805256 Yang Dec 2017 S
9905297 Best Feb 2018 B2
D815190 Dellemann Apr 2018 S
9968155 Wilson May 2018 B2
10070678 Wilson Sep 2018 B2
10165819 Klotz et al. Jan 2019 B2
10201207 VanDerWoude et al. Feb 2019 B2
10226095 Wilson Mar 2019 B2
10227501 Hwang et al. Mar 2019 B2
D849240 Guo et al. May 2019 S
D850256 Ryszawy Jun 2019 S
10321731 Wilson Jun 2019 B2
10345934 Wilson et al. Jul 2019 B2
10384084 Isham et al. Aug 2019 B2
10427385 Wilson et al. Oct 2019 B2
10449397 VanDerWoude et al. Oct 2019 B2
10520756 Gallina et al. Dec 2019 B2
10537236 Bennett et al. Jan 2020 B2
D879384 Sato Mar 2020 S
D882182 Fekete Apr 2020 S
10620670 Wilson et al. Apr 2020 B2
10687569 Mcdirmid Jun 2020 B1
10716986 Winter et al. Jul 2020 B2
10874163 VanDerWoude et al. Dec 2020 B2
D907299 Brown, II et al. Jan 2021 S
D907300 Brown, II et al. Jan 2021 S
D925129 Wilson Jul 2021 S
D925834 Babin et al. Jul 2021 S
11090516 VanDerWoude et al. Aug 2021 B2
11141959 Wilson et al. Oct 2021 B2
11147323 Wilson Oct 2021 B1
11307329 Wilson Apr 2022 B1
11480801 Morris et al. Oct 2022 B1
11490667 Wilson Nov 2022 B1
11510718 Childers et al. Nov 2022 B2
11548356 Wilson et al. Jan 2023 B2
11579339 Thothadri et al. Feb 2023 B2
11709296 Wilson Jul 2023 B2
11807078 Wilson et al. Nov 2023 B2
11988850 Wilson et al. May 2024 B2
20010035936 Maisnik Nov 2001 A1
20020025441 Hieda et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020036362 Chigira et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020101411 Chang Aug 2002 A1
20020109922 Wilson et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020114934 Liu et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020122925 Liu et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020159159 Wilson et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020195910 Hus et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030012936 Draheim et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030087054 Janssen et al. May 2003 A1
20030110613 Ross Jun 2003 A1
20040004605 David Jan 2004 A1
20040109096 Anderson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121105 Janssen et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040139530 Yan Jul 2004 A1
20040202812 Congard et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040227722 Friberg et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040238690 Wood et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040246386 Thomas et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040258933 Enniss et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050002108 Wilson et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015860 Reaux Jan 2005 A1
20050071909 Diaz et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050133035 Yahiaoui et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050180877 Usami et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050186415 Mccormick et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050188821 Yamashita et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050200154 Barbee et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050249957 Jing et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050260343 Han Nov 2005 A1
20060024494 Amano et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060052167 Boddicker et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060056030 Fukuda et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057399 Persoone et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060114245 Masters et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060138694 Biernath et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060158609 Heil Jul 2006 A1
20060177654 Shoshi Aug 2006 A1
20060204776 Chen et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060254088 Mccormick Nov 2006 A1
20060285218 Wilson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070019300 Wilson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070181456 Kusuda et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070211002 Zehner et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070212508 Mase Sep 2007 A1
20070229962 Mason Oct 2007 A1
20070234592 Crates Oct 2007 A1
20070234888 Rotolo De Moraes Oct 2007 A1
20070286995 Li et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080014446 Donea et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080030631 Gallagher Feb 2008 A1
20080030675 Dillon Feb 2008 A1
20080055258 Sauers Mar 2008 A1
20080118678 Huang et al. May 2008 A1
20080151177 Wang Jun 2008 A1
20080160321 Padiyath et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080176018 Enniss et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080192351 Miyagawa et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080231979 Chen Sep 2008 A1
20080256688 Bruce Oct 2008 A1
20080286500 Sussner et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080292820 Padiyath et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090011205 Thiel Jan 2009 A1
20090026095 Lofland et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090054115 Horrdin et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090086415 Chipping Apr 2009 A1
20090087655 Yamada et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105437 Determan et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119819 Thompson May 2009 A1
20090181242 Enniss et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090233032 Craig Sep 2009 A1
20090239045 Kato et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090239048 Sugihara et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100026646 Xiao et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100033442 Kusuda et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100102197 Mcintyre Apr 2010 A1
20100102476 Higgins Apr 2010 A1
20100122402 Tipp May 2010 A1
20100146679 Heil Jun 2010 A1
20100238119 Dubrovsky et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100245273 Hwang et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100270189 Pedersen, II et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110007388 Wilson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110010994 Wilson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110012841 Lin Jan 2011 A1
20110013273 Wilson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110014481 Wilson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110035936 Lee Feb 2011 A1
20110052864 Son Mar 2011 A1
20110097574 Faldysta et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110119801 Wright May 2011 A1
20110165361 Sherman et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110168261 Welser et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110267793 Cohen et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110271497 Suh et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277361 Nichol et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110279383 Wilson et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120003431 Huang Jan 2012 A1
20120030095 Marshall et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120047614 Choi Mar 2012 A1
20120070603 Hsu Mar 2012 A1
20120081792 Neuffer Apr 2012 A1
20120137414 Saylor Jun 2012 A1
20120180204 Hawkins Jul 2012 A1
20120183712 Leonhard et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120188743 Wilson et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120200816 Krasnov et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120291173 Gleason et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130045371 O'Donnell Feb 2013 A1
20130083285 McNeal et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130089688 Wilson et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130098543 Reuter et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130141693 McCabe et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130145525 Arenson et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130222913 Tomoda et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130247286 Vanderwoude et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130293959 Mcdonald Nov 2013 A1
20140020153 Romanski et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140050909 Choi et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140220283 Wilson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140259321 Arnold Sep 2014 A1
20140289937 Capers et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150033431 Hofer Kraner et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150103474 Cho Apr 2015 A1
20150131047 Saylor et al. May 2015 A1
20150202847 Johnson et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150234209 Miyamoto et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150258715 Ohta Sep 2015 A1
20150294656 Hanuschak Oct 2015 A1
20150309609 Wilson et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150349147 Xi et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150359675 Wilson Dec 2015 A1
20160023442 Faris Jan 2016 A1
20160050990 Hayes Feb 2016 A1
20160073720 Niedrich Mar 2016 A1
20160231834 Hardi Aug 2016 A1
20160259102 Taka Sep 2016 A1
20160271922 Uzawa et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160291543 Saito Oct 2016 A1
20160318227 Kim et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170052286 Hines et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170071792 Wilson et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170079364 Paulson Mar 2017 A1
20170129219 Uebelacker et al. May 2017 A1
20170173923 Davis et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170192131 Wilson et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170208878 Kakinuma et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170232713 Mannheim Astete et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170281414 Wilson Oct 2017 A1
20170299898 Gallina et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170318877 Yahiaoui et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180029337 Wilson et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180042324 King Feb 2018 A1
20180052334 Repko Feb 2018 A1
20180094164 Ito et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180148578 Ohta et al. May 2018 A1
20180161208 Huh Jun 2018 A1
20180229480 Chung Aug 2018 A1
20180236753 Wykoff, II et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180295925 Gagliardo et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180338550 Boulware et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190021430 Elliott Jan 2019 A1
20190037948 Romanski et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190116300 Okuno Apr 2019 A1
20190118057 Winter et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190209912 Isserow et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190212474 Le Quang et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190346591 Thothadri et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190389182 Wilson et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200100657 Lee et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200115519 Phillips et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200124768 Wilson Apr 2020 A1
20200134773 Pinter et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200154808 Inouye May 2020 A1
20200178622 Jascomb et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200247102 Wilson et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200261055 Zwierstra et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200281301 Wynalda, Jr. Sep 2020 A1
20200310494 Ahn et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200359718 Jefferis et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200375272 Ulmer et al. Dec 2020 A1
20200384747 Fukuda et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210030095 Reicher Feb 2021 A1
20210162645 Wilson et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210283994 Wilson Sep 2021 A1
20210298380 Brown, II et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210298390 Sup, IV et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210307425 Keim Oct 2021 A1
20210315291 Votolato et al. Oct 2021 A1
20210318553 Gharabegian Oct 2021 A1
20210321692 Wilson Oct 2021 A1
20210321693 Wilson et al. Oct 2021 A1
20210329999 Ackerman Oct 2021 A1
20210368886 Swart et al. Dec 2021 A1
20210386155 Rose Dec 2021 A1
20210393440 Leatt et al. Dec 2021 A1
20210394427 Frisco et al. Dec 2021 A1
20220015472 Boza Jan 2022 A1
20230106407 Arima et al. Apr 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
2005244595 Jul 2006 AU
2015277196 Jan 2017 AU
2386043 Nov 2003 CA
3637188 May 1988 DE
19808535 Sep 1999 DE
202004010014 Apr 2005 DE
202020101562 Apr 2020 DE
202020101794 Apr 2020 DE
192075 Aug 1986 EP
671258 Sep 1995 EP
1471415 Oct 2004 EP
1517791 Mar 2005 EP
1047537 Mar 2010 EP
3157480 Apr 2017 EP
2310862 Sep 1997 GB
2492574 Jan 2013 GB
61017860 Jan 1986 JP
S6117860 Jan 1986 JP
62053832 Mar 1987 JP
04314537 Nov 1992 JP
06143496 May 1994 JP
07021456 Jan 1995 JP
10167765 Jun 1998 JP
2000334812 Dec 2000 JP
2002328613 Nov 2002 JP
2012183822 Sep 2012 JP
2014032222 Feb 2014 JP
2015128896 Jul 2015 JP
2018200329 Dec 2018 JP
6767596 Oct 2020 JP
20120001292 Jan 2012 KR
200700793 Jan 2007 TW
201027992 Jul 2010 TW
0024576 May 2000 WO
03052678 Jun 2003 WO
2009008857 Jan 2009 WO
2015009114 Jan 2015 WO
2015091425 Jun 2015 WO
2015093413 Jun 2015 WO
2015195814 Dec 2015 WO
2019006151 Jan 2019 WO
2019055267 Mar 2019 WO
2021176316 Sep 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (133)
Entry
Prosecution History of U.S. Re-Examination U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,073 titled Touch Screen Protector; pp. 1-1,980.
www.store.moshimode.com; “iVisor AG for iPad 2 Black”; 2004-2010.
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Oct. 25, 2013; pp. 1-31.
Jake Gaecke; “Appletell Reviews the iVisor for iPad”; www.appletell.com; Sep. 15, 2010 at 12:32 p.m. www.technologytell.com/apple/60407/appletell-reviews-ag-for-ipad/; 2 pages.
www.nushield.com/technology.php; “What Makes NuShield Screen Protectors Superior”, 2 pages.
www.spigen.com; “Something You Want”; 2 pages.
www.zagg.com; “Apple iPad 2 (Wi-Fi 3G) Screen Protector”; 2 pages.
www.gadgetguard.com; “Invisible Gadget Guard, the Original”; 1 page.
www.incipotech.com; “Protect Your iPhone 4 with Screen Protectors from Incipo”; 3 pages.
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG iPad Screen Protector”; Jul. 2010; 7 pages.
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor XT Crystal Clear Protector for iPad”; Aug. 2010; 3 pages.
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG for iPad 2 Black”; Mar. 2011; 5 pages.
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG for iPad 2 White”; Mar. 2011; 3 pages.
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG for iPhone 4/4S Black”; Nov. 2010; 5 pages.
www.store.moshimonde.com; “iVisor AG for iPhone 4/4S White”; May 2010; 4 pages.
Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com) 2012.
Racing Optics, Inc. v. Aevoe, Inc., d/b/a/ Moshi; Case No. 15-cv-017744-JCM-VCF; Aevoe's Initial Disclosure Non-Infringement, Invalidity and Unenforceability Contentions (Redacted) dated Jan. 7, 2016.
Defendant Aevoe Corp.'s Non-Infringement Contentions and Responses to Racing Optic's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,545) dated Jan. 7, 2016.
Defendant Aevoe Corp.'s Non-Infringement Contentions and Responses to Racing Optic's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (U.S. Pat. No. 9,104,256) dated Jan. 7, 2016.
Defendant Aevoe Corp.'s Non-Infringement Contentions and Responses to Racing Optic's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions (U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620) dated Jan. 7, 2016.
I-Blason LLC v. Aevoe, Inc. and Aevoe Corp.; Case IPR2016-TBA; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,044,942 (including Exhibits 1001-1019).
Dupont Teijin Films, “Mylar Polyester Film—Optical Properties”, Jun. 2003, 2 pages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body, “Black Body”, Jul. 2009, 11 pages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared, “Infrared”, Jul. 2009, 12 pages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BoPET, “PET Film (biaxially oriented)”, Jul. 2009, 4 pages.
Instashield LLC, Bionic Wrench® Inventor Creates Low-Cost Face Shield For Masses, Apr. 15, 2020, 3 pages.
Tom Zillich, Surrey manufacturer hopes to hit home run with face shield that clips to baseball cap, Apr. 29, 2020, 3 pages.
Opentip, Opromo Safety Face Shield Visor for Adult Kids, Protective Cotton Hat with Removable PVC Face Cover <https://www.opentip.com/product.php?products_id=11699030>, May 5, 2020, 3 pages.
Hefute, Hefute 5 PCS Protective Face Cover with Shield Comfortable Full Protection Face Compatiable with Glasses Anti-Droplet Anti-Pollution and Windproof Transparent Safety Face Cover with Shield(Style B) <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B086GSG8DH/ref=sspa_dk_detail_9?psc=1&pd_rd_i=B086GSG8DH&pd_rd_w=Ocdm2&pf_rd_p=48d372c1-f7e1-4b8b-9d02-4bd86f5158c5&pd_rd_wg=qkB2b&pf_rd_r=M%E2%80%A6>, May 6, 2020, 7 pages.
Geanbaye, Geanbaye Safety Full Face Shield Cap Detachable Baseball Cap Anti-Saliva Anti-Spitting Eye Protective Hat Windproof Dustproof <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B086DV32B8/ref=sspa_dk_detail_8?psc=1&pd_rd_i=B086DV32B8&pd_rd_w=MwjfT&pf_rd_p=48d372c1-f7e1-4b8b-9d02-4bd86f5158c5&pd_rd_wg=pxuOs&pf_rd_r=PNDA%E2%80%A6>, May 5, 2020, 8 pages.
Leigh Buchanan, These 2 Companies Are Making Face Shields for Everyone <https://www.inc.com/leigh-buchanan/face-shields-coronavirus-protection-open-source.html>, May 6, 2020, 8 pages.
Brim Shield, photographs, Apr. 21, 2020, 1 pages.
Hatshield, Shield Yourself With The Hatshield <https://www.hat-shield.com/?gclid=CjwKCAjwp-X0BRAFEiwAheRui1u89v_3URuiwEVvBRGa9TaEfWoZVMJXRkWsZgPTUw-0fHJ5HD-8uhoCc84QAvD_BwE>, Apr. 17, 2020, 11 pages.
Eli N. Perencevich, Moving Personal Protective Equipment Into the Community Face Shields and Containment of COVID-19, Apr. 29, 2020, 2 pages.
Chang, Tian-Ci; Cao, Xun; Bao, Shan-Hu; Ji, Shi-Dong; Luo, Hong-Jie; Jin, Ping; Review of Thermochromic Vanadium Dioxide Based Smart Coatings: From Lab to Commercial Application; Dec. 16, 2017.
Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC); “The Department of Transportation [DOT] Guidebook”; Oct. 2016.
Hostaphan RBB, “Transparent, Temperature Stable Polyester Film for Cooking & Roasting Bags” Jul. 2016.
Hostaphan Win, “White, Long-Term Stable, Thermally Stable Polyester Film for PV Back Sheet Laminates”; Jul. 2016.
PCT Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/054565 (Dec. 20, 2019).
PCT Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/036248 (Sep. 16, 2015).
“Declaration of Jerome Aho”; Filed Aug. 3, 2007; Case 3:07-cv-00221-FDW-DCK; Includes: Exhibit A, Nascar Postcard (1 page), Exhibit B, 50th Anniversary Nascar letter sent Jan. 7, 1998 (1 page), and Exhibit C, Front page of “The Official Nascar Preview and Press Guide” (1 page); 9 pages.
Racing Optics, Inc. v. David Leon O'Neal, Edward M. Wallace and Clear View Racing Optics, LLC; Case 3:07 CV 221; Includes: Exhibit A, Wilson et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,847,492; and Exhibit B, Wilson et al. U.S. Pat. No. 7,184,217; 34 pages.
International Search Report; International Application No. PCT/US99/95128; Date of Completion: Jan. 18, 2000; 54 pages.
International Search Report; International Application No. PCT/US02/10971; Date of Completion: Nov. 20, 2002; 3 pages.
International Search Report; International Application No. PCT/US03/16284; Date of Completion: Mar. 9, 2004; 3 pages.
European Search Report for Application No. 15809930.9-107 / 3157480 (Dec. 15, 2017).
Canadian Office Action for Application Serial No. 2,952,436 (Nov. 15, 2019).
Canadian Office Action for Application Serial No. 2,952,436 (May 3, 2019).
Australian Examination Report for Application Serial No. 2015277196 (Oct. 18, 2018).
www.wikipedia.org, Refractive Index, Oct. 31, 2014.
Racing Optics, Inc. v. Aevoe Corp. Dba Moshi; Case 2:15-cv-01774-RCJ-VCF; “Answer to Aevoe's Counterclaims—Jury Trial Demanded”; Nov. 2, 2015; 15 pages.
Gregory Brower et al.; “Complaint for Patent Infringement”; Sep. 15, 2015; 15 pages.
Jeffrey A. Silverstri et al.; “Answer to Complaint for Patent Infringement”; Oct. 7, 2015; 59 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681; Aug. 26, 2016; 8 pages.
List of References for U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681; Receipt date Jun. 30, 2016; 3 pages.
List of References for U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681; Receipt date Apr. 27, 2016; 4 pages.
Examiner's search strategy and results for U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681, filed Aug. 21, 2016; 2 pages.
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Case No. IPR2016-01164; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,104,256 (including Exhibits 1001-1011 and Petitioner Power of Attorney Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42. 10(b) for Petition for Inter Partes Review); Jun. 21, 2016.
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Case No. IPR2016-01165; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,545(including Exhibits 1001-1006 and Petitioner Power of Attorney Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42. 10(b) for Petition for Inter Partes Review); Jun. 21, 2016.
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Case No. IPR2016-01166; Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,274,625 (including Exhibits 1001-1011 and Petitioner Power of Attorney Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42. 10(b) for Petition for Inter Partes Review); Jun. 21, 2016.
Exhibit 1—Invalidity Contentions re: '545 Patent Under LPR 1-8(b)-(d); at least as early as Jul. 1, 2016.
Exhibit 2—Invalidity Contentions re: '256 Patent Under LPR 1-8(b)-(d); at least as early as Jul. 1, 2016.
Exhibit 3—Invalidity Contentions re: '620 Patent Under LPR 1-8(b)-(d); at least as early as Jul. 1, 2016.
Exhibit 4—Invalidity Contentions re: '625 Patent Under LPR 1-8(b)-(d); at least as early as Jul. 1, 2016.
Exhibit 1002—U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,671 to Gustafson; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-6.
Exhibit 1004—U.S. Pat. No. 7,351,470 to Draheim et al.; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-15.
Exhibit 1001—U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620 to Wilson et al.; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-15.
Exhibit 1003—U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,765 to Murakami; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; p. 1-8.
Exhibit 1005—U.S. Pat. No. 7,957,524 to Chipping; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2017; pp. 1-20.
Aevoe Corp., Racing Optics, Inc.; Petition for Inter Partes Review; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-55.
Exhibit 1006—Japanese Application No. JP 2002-328613 to Kitaguchi Translation; IPR2016-01745; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-10.
Exhibit 1009—U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,311; Interview Summary; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; p. 1-3.
Exhibit 1010—U.S. Appl. No. 15/838,311; Notice of Allowance; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-8.
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Declaration of Darran Cairns; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-32.
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Petitioner's Power of Attorney; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-3.
Exhibit 1007—U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,311; Response to Office Action; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; p. 1-19.
Exhibit 1008—U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,311; Response and Request for Continued Examination; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-21.
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Mandatory Notices; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-4.
Aevoe Corp. v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Power of Attorney; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 7, 2016; pp. 1-4.
Aevoe Corp v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Notice of Filing Date; Case IPR2016-01745; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,974,620; at least as early as Sep. 6, 2016; p. 1-5.
Aevoe Corp v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Decision; Case IPR2016-01164; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,104,256; at least as early as Nov. 7, 2016; p. 1-24.
Aevoe Corp v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Decision; Case IPR2016-01166; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,274,625; at least as early as Nov. 7, 2016; p. 1-23.
Aevoe Corp v. Racing Optics, Inc.; Decision; Case IPR2016-01165; Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,545; at least as early as Nov. 7, 2016; p. 1-25.
Settlement and License Agreement, Dec. 21, 2007, 28 pgs.
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2016 pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,681, filed Apr. 5, 2016; 8 pages.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for US2020/016245 (Apr. 28, 2020).
Professional Plastics (http://www.professionalplastics.com/MelinexPETFilmDupont) 2012.
Whitney, Frank D., Preliminary Injunction, Aug. 21, 2007, 5 pgs.
Higgins, John P., Answer and Counterclaims to First Amended Complaint, Sep. 4, 2007, 27 pgs.
Ballato, John, Expert Report of John Ballato, Ph.D., Nov. 12, 2007, 5 pgs.
Russell, Geoffrey A., Rebuttal Report of Geoffrey A. Russell, Ph.D., on issues raised in the Export Report of John Ballato, Ph.D., Nov. 21, 2007, 15 pgs.
Higgins, John P., Defendants' Second Supplement to Its Response to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, Dec. 7, 2007, 25 pgs.
Barnhardt, John J. III, Redacted Version Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Dec. 3, 2007, 36 pgs.
Higgins, John P., Defendants' Second Supplement to its Response to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, Dec. 7, 2007, 26 pgs.
Whitney, Frank D., Consent Judgment Order, Jan. 3, 2008, 5 pgs.
Ballato, John, Supplemental Expert Report of John Ballato, Ph.D., Nov. 19, 2007, 10 pgs.
Moore, Steven D., Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' New and Untimely Invalidity Theory, Dec. 19, 2007, 3 pgs.
Moore, Steven D., Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion to Strike Defendants' New and Untimely Invalidity Theory, Dec. 19, 2007, 10 pgs.
Barnhardt, John J. III, Notice Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 282, Dec. 18, 2007, 3 pgs.
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,952,436; Jul. 8, 2020.
www.wikipedia.org. “Black Body”, Jul. 2009, 11 pages.
www.wikipedia.org. “Infrared”, Jul. 2009, 12 pages.
www.wikipedia.org. “PET Film (biaxially oriented)”, Jul. 2009, 4 pages.
PCT International Application No. PCT/US99/25128 with International Search Report, Date of Completion Jan. 18, 2000, 54 Pages.
English translation of TW201027992, “Monitor Protection Device for a Flat Panel Display”, 11 pgs.
Pulse Racing Innovations, EZ Tear Universal Single Pull Tearoff Ramp, webpage <https://www.pulseracinginnovations.com>, Dec. 30, 2020, 6 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US20/24639, Jun. 11, 2020, 13 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/049919; Nov. 27, 2020.
Tian-Chi Chang, Xun Cao, Shan-Hu Bao, Shi=Dong Ji, Hong-Jie Luo, Ping Jin; “Review on Thermochromic Vanadium Dioxide Based Smart Coatings: From Lab to Commercial Application”; Dec. 16, 2017.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/062230; Feb. 8, 2021.
“Anti-reflective coating,” Wikipedia, last updated Jul. 13, 2017 by Andy Dingley, <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-reflective_coating>.
“Monotonic function,” Wikipedia, accessed May 24, 2017, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotonic_function>.
“Thin Film,” Wikipedia, last updated Jun. 20, 2017, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_film>.
“Tips to Get Quality Anti-Reflection Optical Coatings,” Penn Optical Coatings, accessed May 24, 2017, <http://www.pennoc.com/tipsgetqualityantireflectionopticalcoatings/>.
Langlet, M., “Antireflective Films”, from Chapter 15 of Handbook of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Processing Characterization and Applications, copyright 2005, pp. 332-334, 337, 339-341., taken from website <https://books.google.com/books?id=i9swy1D2HxIC&Ipg=PA339&dq=AR%20thick%20film%20coatings&pg=PA339#v=onepage&q=AR%20thick%20film%20coatings&f=false>.
Li, H.-M. et al., “Influence of weight ratio in polymer blend film on the phase separation structure and its optical properties”, The European Physical Journal Applied Physics, 45, 20501, published Jan. 31, 2009, EDP Sciences, 4 pages.
MDS Nordion, “Gamma Compatible Materials,” Datasheet, Aug. 2007, 4 pages, <https://ab-div-bdi-bl-blm.web.cern.ch/Radiation/Gamma_Compatible_Materials_List_company.pdf>, retrieved on Sep. 29, 2021.
Zhang, Xin_Xiang et al., Abstract of “One-step sol-gel preparation of PDMS-silica ORMOSILs as environment-resistant and crack-free thick antireflective coatings,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, Issue 26, 2012, <http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2012/m/c2jm31005h#!divAbstract>.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/044438, dated Oct. 23, 2017, 12 pages.
Chemical Book, “Benzophenone”, https://www.chemicalbook.com/Chemical ProductProperty_EN_CB57 44679.htm, available at least as of 2017, accessed on line on Dec. 15, 2021 (Year: 2017).
Chemical Book, “Polymethylhydrosiloxane”, https://www.chemicalbook.com/Chemical ProductProperty _EN_ CB3694969. htm, available at least as of 2017, accessed online on Dec. 15, 2021 (Year: 2017).
Guide Chem, “UV Stabilizer”, https://wap.guidechem.com/trade/uv-stabilizer-uv-absorber-ligh-id3578792.html, available at least as of 2018, accessed online on Dec. 15, 2021 (Year: 2018).
Hostaphan RBB biaxially oriented film data sheet (Year: 2011).
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/024639; Jun. 11, 2020.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/026165, dated Jul. 9, 2021, 10 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US21/20421, May 20, 2021, 8 pages.
Wiseman, Sr., United States Statutory Invention Registration No. H1023, published Mar. 3, 1992, 7 pages.
Chemical Book, Bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate, available online at least as of 2017, https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB8121619.htm, accessed online Mar. 15, 2022 (Year: 2017).
Pearson Dental, “UV Protection Face Shields”, https://www.pearsondental.com/catalog/subcat_thumb.asp?majcatid=750&catid=l0149, available online at least as of Jan. 27, 2021 per Internet Archive, accessed online on Sep. 15, 2021. (Year: 2021).
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/031823, mailed Jul. 14, 2022, 11 pages.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/046171, mailed Jan. 18, 2023, 15 pages.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/012316, mailed Apr. 14, 2023, 11 pages.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/26598, mailed Sep. 12, 2023, 7 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20240151881 A1 May 2024 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 18167673 Feb 2023 US
Child 18315394 US
Parent 17386304 Jul 2021 US
Child 17655328 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 18315394 May 2023 US
Child 18408123 US
Parent 17655328 Mar 2022 US
Child 18167673 US