Low-residue macroemulsion cleaner with perchloroethylene

Abstract

A stable, oil-in-water macroemulsion cleaner is provided which has low toxicity, rapid evaporation rate and leaves low residue after use. The cleaner comprises perchloroethylene, water, ethanol and/or ethyl acetate, and non-ionic surfactant. The macroemulsion cleaner can be used to remove greasy and oily soils from soiled surfaces, and is non-flammable as an aerosol spray with appropriate propellant formulations.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The invention relates to a water and perchloroethylene macroemulsion and its use as a low-residue cleaner.

2. Description of the Related Art

Chlorinated chemicals, such as methylchloroform, have been used in various cleaning applications. The emissive use of methylchloroform in cleaning, however, is being phased out due to its ability to deplete atmospheric ozone. Therefore, there is a need for alternative cleaning technologies.

Desired properties for alternatives to methylchloroform cleaners include low toxicity, non-flammability, rapid evaporation rate and low residue. Many aqueous technologies prove insufficient in drying time and low residue requirements. Many potential solvent alternatives possess toxicity or flammability problems.

Emulsion cleaners have been described in the art. For example, WO 92/18600 describes a microemulsion comprising an organic solvent or solvent blend having a solubility parameter of between about 6.9 and 8.9 (cal/cm.sup.3).sup.1/2, sufficient surfactant to support a stable microemulsion, and water in an amount sufficient to provide a total volatile organic compounds (VOC) content of less than 200 grams/liter. Additional types of emulsion cleaners are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,553,145, U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,917, U.S. Pat. No. 5,176,986, CA 992425, EP 0 075 546 and WO 94/23012. The known emulsion cleaners, however, also lack one or more of the aforementioned desired properties for an alternative to ozone-depleting chemicals.

While the art has made significant strides in the past, there is still a need for an alternative to methylchloroform cleaners which possesses low toxicity, non-flammability, rapid evaporation rate and leaves low residue after use.

OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore a general object of the present invention to provide an improved macroemulsion cleaner.

It is a more specific object of the present invention to provide a macroemulsion cleaner which has low toxicity, non-flammability, rapid evaporation rate and leaves low residue after use.

It is another object of the present invention to use such a macroemulsion cleaner for removing greasy and oily soils from a soiled surface.

Accordingly, in one aspect, the present provides a stable, oil-in-water macroemulsion low residue cleaner. The cleaner comprises perchloroethylene, water, ethanol and/or ethyl acetate, and non-ionic surfactant.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

As noted above, one aspect of the present invention relates to a stable, oil-in-water macroemulsion low residue cleaner which comprises perchloroethylene, water, ethanol and/or ethyl acetate, and non-ionic surfactant. Perchloroethylene is a chlorinated chemical that has been shown to be a non-ozone depletion chemical. Perchloroethylene is regulated in the workplace as a VOC in some states, such as California. However, when used in the macroemulsion according to the invention, the VOC content complies with regulatory standards. Thus, the macroemulsion cleaner of the invention is advantageous in that it not only offers VOC regulatory compliance, but is also as effective a cleaner as pure perchloroethylene or methylchloroform.

In general, a macroemulsion is a heterogeneous system comprising at least one immiscible liquid dispersed as droplets in another liquid. The immiscible liquid droplets have a diameter exceeding 0.1 micron. See "Emulsions & Emulsion Technology" (Kenneth J. Lissant, Ed. (1974) Marcel Dekker, Inc., p. 128), the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

The macroemulsion cleaner of the invention generally contains from 35 to 65 weight % perchloroethylene, more preferably from 45 to 55 weight %, most preferably about 50 weight %. The water content of the macroemulsion cleaner of the invention generally is from 20 to 50 weight %, more preferably from 30 to 40 weight %, most preferably about 35 weight %.

The macroemulsion cleaner of the invention further comprises ethyl acetate and/or ethyl alcohol. Ethyl acetate generally provides from 0 to 15 weight % of the macroemulsion, more preferably from 5 to 10 weight %, and most preferably from 6 to 9 weight %. Ethyl alcohol also generally provides from 0 to 15 weight % of the macroemulsion, more preferably from 5 to 10 weight % and most preferably from 6 to 9 weight %.

Although ethyl alcohol is preferred, other lower alkyl (C1-C6) alcohols may be used, including methanol, isopropyl alcohol, n-propyl alcohol. Similarly, lower alkyl (C1-C6) alkyl esters may also be used, including methyl acetate, propyl acetate, ethyl formate and ethyl propionate.

The macroemulsion cleaner of the invention also comprises a non-ionic surfactant. The surfactant is necessary to obtain a stable emulsion, i.e., an emulsion that is preferably stable (i.e., visually one phase), for a minimum of four hours. If some phase separation does occur, a brief shaking or stirring action will restore the emulsion to one phase.

The preferred non-ionic surfactants for use in the present invention are oxazolines modified with one or more alkyl groups and one or more groups containing repeating units of alkylene oxides (alkyl-alkylene oxide-oxazolines). The ALKATERGE series of surface active agents (Angus Chemical) are representative of such compounds, with ALKATERGE T-IV being preferred (ethanol, 2, 2'-{(2-heptadecyl-4(5H)-oxazolylidine) bis(methylene oxy-2,1-ethanediyloxy)}bis-). ALKATERGE T-IV is also referred to as AP1136 Alkaterge. Other non-ionic surfactants may also be used as the emulsification agent according to the invention, including the TWEEN series (ethoxylated sorbitan monoleate), the SURFYNOL series of surfactants (e.g., Surfynol 61, which is 3,5-dimethyl-1-hexyn-3-ol), Aerosol OT (sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (75%) in mixture of ethanol and water, by Cyanamid), and Igepal CO 730 (nonylphenoxypoly(ethyleneoxy)ethanol). It is preferable to use less than 0.5 weight % of non-ionic surfactant in the macroemulsion cleaner of the present invention to limit residue. Furthermore, it is preferable to use a non-ionic surfactant which has a molecular weight lower than 350. However, greater amounts of surfactants can improve storage stability.

For example, the macroemulsion cleaner may be used in the form of an aerosol product, in which case a propellant such as dimethyl ether or blends of isobutane/propane (e.g., A70) may be included. For minimum VOC content, HFC-152a (1,1 difluoroethane) is preferred. Other propellants which may be used include HFC 134a (1,1,1,2 tetrafluoroethane); azeotropes of dimethyl ether with propane, HFC-152a or HFC-134a; and azeotropes of HFC-152a with propane, isobutane or n-butane; azeotropes of HFC-134a with propane, isobutane or n-butane.

A preferred macroemulsion cleaner of the present invention comprises in percent by weight, 50% perchloroethylene, 35% water, 7.67% ethylacetate, 6.86% ethyl alcohol and 0.44% ALKATERGE T-IV.

The various components of the macroemulsion cleaner of the present invention are combined and mixed to form a stable oil-in-water emulsion. Generally, the order of addition is perchloroethylene, water, ethanol/ethyl acetate, and surfactant.

The macroemulsion cleaner of the present invention is generally used to remove greasy and oily soils from surfaces soiled with such substances, although the macroemulsion cleaner is also effective on other types of soils. The macroemulsion cleaner is applied to the soiled surface, and the cleaner and greasy and oily soils are removed by any convenient method, for example by wiping or drip removal by gravity. The invention is advantageous in that very little residue remains on the cleaned, dry surface, preferably less-than 500 mg/m.sup.2.

EXAMPLE 1

The following candidate formulations were produced, each component expressed in grams as shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1______________________________________ FormulationComponent H I L N P R______________________________________Perchloroethylene 20.01 19.38 20.32 15.12 12.28 16.83Water 12.16 17.33 16.21 8.42 6.36 10.48Acetone 8.00Tween 80 0.37Surfynol 61 0.02 0.22 0.14Ethyl acetate 3.31 0.31Ethanol 2.96AP1136 Alkaterge 0.19 1.27 0.30Acetonitrile 4.50Propylene glycol 2.18 1.32Aerosol OT 0.15 0.412 Methylcyclohexanol 2.39______________________________________

The above candidate macroemulsions possessed good stability (at least 4 hours) and, thus, were tested for cleaning performance, non-volatile material (NVM) residue, evaporation rate and flash point (SETA closed cup, ASTM D-3828). In order to perform the aforementioned tests, the various formulations were prepared in 1000 gram quantities in liter bottles.

Non Volatile Material (NVM)

NVM results were obtained by pouring 50 grams of each blended formulation into glass evaporating dishes and placing them in a vacuum oven set at 100.degree. C. with 5 inches Hg vacuum. The samples were allowed to remain in these conditions overnight. The next day the temperature was increased to 105.degree. C., vacuum was changed to 30 inches Hg, and the samples were allowed to remain overnight. On the third day, the samples were cooled to room temperature and residues were determined by weight difference. The residues left in the dishes were easily water soluble except for formulations P and R.

Evaporation Rate

Evaporation rates were determined by dipping pre-weighed stainless steel coupons (2".times.4".times.1/8" with 1".times.1/16" round recesses milled into one side) into each formulation and then hanging them (vertically) to dry. Coupons were weighed on a four-place balance at the first five and ten minutes of evaporation time and every ten minutes thereafter until no discernible weight changes were seen. Therefore, if the total drying time was between 10 and 20 minutes, the time shown is 20 minutes. The data were obtained by placing the coupons in a fume hood at 20.degree. C. with air flow not determined. Two trials were run.

Residue in mg/m.sup.2 on Coupons

The same coupons as described in the evaporation rate section above that were dipped into each formulation were weighed after evaporation was complete to determine the remaining residue.

Cleaning Ability

Cleaning ability was determined for each concentrate by dipping the coupons described above in a soil mixture, dipping them into the stirred formulation, and hanging them to dry. A soil mixture was made with the following components in wt. %:

______________________________________Soil Mixture #155.91% wt. % Quaker State 10W30 motor oil 8.49% wt. % Iron Oxide, Aldrich #1309-37-1 5.11% wt. % Carbon, Cabot Sterling NS1, AP-208430.49% wt. % Kaolin, Fisher K2-500Soil Mixture #240.00% wt. % Soil Mixture #160.00% wt. % 1,1,1-trichloroethane______________________________________

The coupons were dipped into the stirred soil #2 and hung to dry for 1 hour. To perform the cleaning test the soiled coupon was then dipped into the stirred formulation for 2 minutes and hung to dry for at least 1.5 hours. Cleaning ability was measured by the amount of residue remaining on the coupon, determined by re-weighing. Two coupons were cleaned in each formulation, with the averaged results contained in Table 2. Additional cleaning tests were performed with formulations "I" and "H", as well as with Dow Invert cleaning products, with a variety of soils. Results are shown in Table 3.

TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________ Cleaning Conc. NVM Evaporation Residue AbilityFormulation Components (wt %) (wt %) (minutes) (mg/m.sup.2) (mg/m.sup.2)__________________________________________________________________________ Perchloroethylene 100 -- 20 63 94 20.sup. H.sup.1 Perchloroethylene 43.3 1.01 10 223 4669 Water 30.0 20 393 Acetone 19.7 Tween 80 0.91 Surfynol 61 0.05.sup. I.sup.2 Perchloroethylene 50.0 0.42 30 0 295 Water 35.0 20 214 Ethyl acetate 7.67 Ethanol (denatured) 6.86 Alkaterge T-IV 0.44L Perchloroethylene 48.0 2.94 20 1027 1416 Water 38.3 20 1385 Acetonitrile 10.6 Alkaterge T-IV 3.0N Perchloroethylene 58.1 1.11 110 599 9111 Water 32.4 110 625 Propylene glycol 8.38 Alkaterge T-IV 1.15P Perchloroethylene 59.5 0.9 110 679 4131 Water 30.8 110 322 Ethyl acetate 1.50 Propylene glycol 6.40 Aerosol OT 0.73 Surfynol 61 1.07R Perchloroethylene 55.6 1.05 30 420 16624 Water 34.6 40 527 2-Methylcyclohexanol 7.90 Aerosol OT 1.36 Surfynol 61 0.46__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1 Formulation H exhibited a flash point of 32.degree. F. .sup.2 Formulation I exhibited a flash point of 57.degree. F. TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Cleaning Ability (mg/m.sup.2).sup.1Formulation Soil 1 Soil 2 Soil 3 Soil 4 Soil 5 Soil 6 Soil 7 Soil 8 Soil 9 Soil 10 Blank__________________________________________________________________________Perchloroethylene 201 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Dow Invert 5000 4140 1501 1260 11944 10908 3207 3118 1340 1590 1456 1474Dow Invert 2000 3024 1679 1858 19671 13463 1501 3448 1474 1233 1796 1733Dow Invert 1000 2073 1706 2037 13454 10845 4913 2617 1626 2215 1634 1599H.sup.2 4669 1358 456 16964 13427 3743 2376 5297 724 241 491I.sup.3 295 197 80 161 9630 0 0 0 0 0 98Trichloroethane 344 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.1 For Soil 1, each soiled coupon was dipped for 2 minutes in one jar of solution, with 2 coupons cleaned per formulation. For all other soils, each soiled coupon was dipped into a first jar of solution for 1 minute, then into a second jar of fresh solution for 1 minute, with one coupon cleaned per formulation. .sup.2 Formulation H is as described in Table 2. .sup.3 Formulation I is as described in Table 2. Soil 1 Brake Soil Formulation. Soil 2 Automatic transmission fluid: Havoline. Soil 3 Trim Sol: Master Chemical, water soluble cutting fluid. Soil 4 Cool Draw: Oakite, water soluble drawing oil. Soil 5 Draw Clean G: Oakite, nonwater soluble drawing oil. Soil 6 Mineral Oil: Fisher, heavy paraffin oil. Soil 7 Motor Oil: Quaker State 10W30. Soil 8 Lithium Grease: Valvoline. Soil 9 Permanent Marker: Sanford black felt marker. Soil 10 Qual Star: Cincinnati Milacron, water soluble cutting oil, 25% i water. Blank Coupon without any soil dipped in cleaner.

EXAMPLE 2

The candidate formulations were also tested as potential aerosol products using either dimethyl ether (DME) or A70 (isobutane/propane) propellant. Properties measured included pH, formulation stability with propellant, spray patterns and aerosol flammability. The targeted vapor pressure for the experimental products was 35 to 50 psig. The pH of each formulation was measured by spraying the aerosol onto pH paper and noting the color. The flame extension test was performed according to DOT specifications. To determine formulation stability, the aerosols were prepared in clear glass compatibility bottles for observation. The results are presented in Table 4.

TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________ Aerosol Bottle Total Pressure Spray Pattern/ Stability FlameFormulation Components wt % (psig) Behavior (overnight) Extension Test pH__________________________________________________________________________H Perchloroethylene 35.7 50 Some foaming One layer, Very 7 Water 21.7 but then but flammable. Acetone 14.3 sheeting starting Tween 80 0.66 action good. separation. Surfynol 61 0.04 Not as good as L. DME 27.7I Perchloroethylene 35.4 44 Not evaluated. One layer, Flammable 7(DME) Water 24.8 but Pressure range Ethyl acetate 5.43 starting during Ethanol 4.85 separation. discharge 44 Alkaterge T-IV 0.31 to 23 psig. DME 29.2I Perchloroethylene 42.0 42 Breaks apart Used after No flame --(DME/A70) Water 29.4 quickly, some two hours, extension Ethyl acetate 6.45 streaking. not allowed seen. Ethanol 5.77 Does not to settle Pressure range Alkaterge T-IV 0.37 sheet. overnight. during DME 10.1 Emulsion discharge 32 A70 5.81 stable over to 22 psig. the 2 hours observed.I Perchloroethylene 44.3 39 Foamier but Used after No flame --(A70) Water 31.0 breaks apart two hours, extension Ethyl acetate 6.8 rapidly, does not allowed seen. Ethanol 6.08 not sheet to settle Pressure range Alkaterge T-IV 0.39 thinly. Foam overnight. during A70 11.4 slides as Emulsion discharge 28 unit, seems to stable over to 19 psig. "carry-off" the 2 hours soil observed.L Perchloroethylene 30.6 38 Wide. Good Two layers. Wide spray. 8 Water 24.4 sheeting. Flammable. Acetonitrile 6.78 Alkaterge T-IV 1.92 DME 36.3N Perchloroethylene 44.0 45 Less thick, One layer. Variable 8 Water 24.5 good sheeting. flammability. Propylene glycol 6.34 No water Alkaterge T-IV 0.87 droplets seen. DME 24.3P Perchloroethylene 33.6 50 Foamier than H Two layers. Very 7 Water 17.4 but then flammable. Ethyl acetate 0.84 sheets, Propylene glycol 3.61 streaks, after Aerosol OT 0.42 standing water Surfynol 61 0.61 droplets seen. DME 43.6R Perchloroethylene 43.2 43 Foamiest but Two layers. Very 8 Water 26.9 quickly flammable. 2-Methylcyclohexanol 6.14 sheets. Does Aerosol OT 1.06 streak but Surfynol 61 0.35 very small DME 22.3 water droplets after standing.__________________________________________________________________________

EXAMPLE 3

In order to lower total VOC content, formulations according to the invention were tested using 1,1-difluoroethane as propellant. The formulation had the following compositions and properties:

TABLE V______________________________________% Component Aerosol A Aerosol B______________________________________Perchloroethylene 36.71 42.61Water 25.70 29.83Ethyl Acetate 5.03 5.84Ethanol 5.65 6.56Alkaterge T-IV 0.33 0.38Dymel .RTM. 152A 26.59 14.78Observed Aerosol Pressure, 52 45psig______________________________________

The propellant was added via a liquid propellant station, which used nitrogen to force the liquid into an aerosol bottle. The aerosol bottles were shaken following the addition of the propellant to the concentrate. After standing for 3.5 hours, Aerosol A had separated slightly into two layers. Some separation was just barely observed for Aerosol B. Both formulations tested as non-flammable by the DOT aerosol flame extension test. These aerosol formulations contain between 47% and 55% VOC components and maintain sufficient emulsion stability for cleaning performance.

Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings and within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A stable, oil-in-water macroemulsion low-residue cleaner comprising, by weight, about 35% to about 65% perchloroethylene, about 20% to about 50% water, up to about 15% ethanol, up to about 15% ethyl acetate, and non-ionic surfactant present in an amount of 0.5% or less, wherein at least 5% ethanol or ethyl acetate is present.

2. A method of cleaning greasy and oily soils from a surface comprising the steps of:

a) applying the macroemulsion cleaner according to claim 1 to said surface; and

b) removing said macroemulsion cleaner and said greasy and oily soils from said surface.

3. The macroemulsion cleaner according to claim 1, wherein the non-ionic surfactant is an alkyl-alkyleneoxide-oxazoline.

4. The macroemulsion cleaner according to claim 3, wherein the non-ionic surfactant is an alkyl-ethylene oxide-oxazoline.

5. The macroemulsion cleaner according to claim 1, wherein the non-ionic surfactant has a molecular weight lower than 350.

6. The macroemulsion cleaner according to claim 1, said cleaner leaving less than 500 mg/m.sup.2 of residue on a surface after being used to clean said surface which has been soiled with lithium grease.

7. The macroemulsion cleaner according to claim 1, said cleaner leaving less than 500 mg/m.sup.2 of residue on a surface after being used to clean said surface which has been soiled with water soluble drawing oil.

8. The macroemulsion cleaner according to claim 1, said cleaner comprising an aerosol propellant.

9. The macromolecular cleaner according to claim 8, wherein said aerosol propellant is dimethyl ether.

10. The macromolecular cleaner according to claim 8, wherein said aerosol propellant is a mixture of isobutane and propane.

11. The macromolecular cleaner according to claim 8, wherein said aerosol propellant is 1,1-difluoroethane.

12. The macroemulsion cleaner according to claim 1, comprising, by weight %, 50% perchloro-ethylene, 35% water, 7.67% ethyl acetate, 6.86% ethanol, and 0.44% ethanol, 2,2'-{(2-heptadecyl-4(5H)-oxazolylidine) bis(methylene oxy-2,1-ethanediyloxy)}bis-.

13. The method according to claim 2, wherein said macroemulsion cleaner is formed into an aerosol spray before it is applied to said surface.

14. The method according to claim 2, wherein less than 500 mg/m.sup.2 of residue remains on said surface after removal of said macromolecular cleaner and said greasy and oily soils.