1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to mixing apparatus for producing blends of liquids, solids suspensions, and gas dispersions, at low and controllable shear.
2. Prior Art
Various different types of impellers are used for different mixing applications. Among other purposes, mixing may involve any of various procedures in which agitation, flow or other movement is produced in a material, and an impeller affects the movement. Typically the impeller is moved relative to a vessel containing the liquids or solids to be mixed, but that is just one possible configuration.
Mixing often is used in an effort to achieve uniformity of blend or solids suspension, crystallization and dispersion of immiscible fluids or gases, etc., and this disclosure, without limitation, generally refers to examples in which such mixing is involved.
The degree of mixing obtained over a given mixing duration, and/or the duration of mixing needed to achieve a given degree of mixing, depends in part upon the rate at which mechanical energy is transferred from the impeller to the fluid. Transfer of energy can be a complex process, and takes place throughout the entire mixing domain. The intensity of energy dissipated locally within a vessel varies with location. A high proportion of energy dissipation occurs in the impeller zone, where a total of 20% to 25% of the energy supplied in generating relative movement of the impeller is dissipated in the impeller swapped volume. The swapped volume is the volume where the moving impeller blades encounter product on a leading side of the blades, displace the product, and where other product fills in on the trailing side of the blades.
Products containing delicate particle agglomerates, polymers such as latex, living organisms and other such products, can be damaged by high levels of shear. High shear results from vigorous mixing characterized by a high rate of dissipation of energy into the product. Inasmuch as the transfer of energy is most concentrated in the impeller zone, it would be advantageous when mixing such products to reduce local shear at the impeller to a minimum. Reducing shear reduces the transfer and dissipation of energy into the local impeller zone.
One way to decrease local energy dissipation at an impeller is to increase the projected height or axial extension of the impeller blades. This increases the volume of product that is encountered by the impeller blades and “swapped” as the impeller passes during each impeller rotation. Assuming equal process power is applied to a rotating impeller shaft (i.e., equal torque and rate of rotation), changing to an axially longer impeller will spread the same energy over a larger swapped volume. That reduces local dissipation because the dissipation is less concentrated.
Increasing the swapped volume by increasing the radial dimension of the blades also increases the impeller volume and spreads the energy over a larger volume. However, the radially outer part of an impeller has a higher linear speed if the radius is made longer, which is a factor that increases local shear at the radially outer parts of the impeller blade.
Although dissipated energy from an axially extended larger impeller is spread over a larger swapped volume, the apparatus can still be effective for mixing. The larger impeller affects a larger local impeller zone, and the overall batch may still be well mixed.
The idea of enlarging the size of an impeller blade in this way so as to encounter or swap a larger volume and achieve mixing at less concentrated localized shear can be found, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,508,583 Shankwitz, at al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,014 Takata, at al., and U.S. Pat. No. 6,331,071 Akamine, at al.
The foregoing listed patents provide mixing configurations wherein the impeller is characterized by substantially vertical impeller blades, i.e., flat or planar shapes extending radially from and axially along a rotating vertical impeller shaft. This structure produces predominantly a rotational and/or radial flow of product in the impeller zone, and is relatively inefficient for mixing. The movement of the product due to rotation of the impeller is relatively limited to rotating rather than otherwise moving the impeller volume, namely that portion of the product that is in the path of the blades of the rotating impeller. Radial impellers are prone to stratification of the batch in the mixing vessel.
It would be advantageous to provide a configuration in which a low shear impeller is more efficient with respect to its mixing efficiency, without sacrificing the benefits of spreading the dissipation and shear over a large impeller swapping volume.
Accordingly, an efficient mixing method and apparatus is provided with aspects that produce a good top to bottom axial flow of product and reduces the tendency of a radially protruding and axially extending impeller structure to promote stratification of the batch. The result is a more full and uniform dispersion of phases through the entire mixing vessel, i.e., improved mixing efficiency, in a low shear impeller structure. This and other advantageous results are obtained from structuring the device so as to add an axial component of flow.
According to another inventive aspect, an impeller apparatus and method employ asymmetrical impeller elements and/or placements. Often, an opening into a vessel for passing the impeller shaft (normally an opening at the top of the vessel) defines a dimensional restriction. It is not possible to insert through that restriction an impeller with a larger diameter than the opening. Typically, for example, a 36″ diameter vessel may have 6″ diameter flange opening at the top. This limits impeller diameter to less than 6″. According to the invention, an asymmetric impeller diameter in such a situation may provide an operational impeller volume with a diameter up to 9.5″ or more. A larger diameter impeller moves a higher flow at lower local dissipation than a smaller diameter impeller, other thing being equal, by averaging the shaft rotation energy over a larger impeller volume.
The invention encompasses configurations for impellers, impeller blades and vessels for mixing of fluids, with limited and low shear. The impeller blades can be mounted on a vertical rotating shaft that is centered or off center relative to the vessel. The vessel may be equipped with vertical baffles extending inwardly from the inside of the vessel wall toward the impeller, or in other arrangements the vessel can have no baffles. These variations are made depending upon liquid properties and process requirements.
The mixing process can involve a single impeller or multiple impellers. The impeller height or axial extension along the impeller shaft is equal to the cosine of the blade height according to an inclination angle or slope of the blades relative to a plane parallel to the rotation axis (typically from vertical). The slope is an inclined plane that can be placed so as to promote axially upward or downward pumping.
Each impeller or impeller stage can have a single or double blade. Double blade impellers preferably are staggered by 90° to promote mechanical stability. Single blade impellers are staggered by 180° to counterbalance asymmetrical fluid forces and a mixing apparatus with such impellers normally has a minimum of two impellers or stages. Single blade impellers are advantageous for vessels with restricted openings.
These and other objects and aspects of the invention will become apparent in connection with the following description of a representative but nonlimiting set of exemplary embodiments.
There are shown in the drawings embodiments of the invention as presently preferred for a variety of applications. The invention is applicable as well to other applications and embodiments in addition to those specifically shown in the drawings, wherein:
This detailed description refers to the embodiments shown in the respective figures and insofar as terms respecting orientations are found in the description (such as vertical, horizontal, above, below, etc.), such terms are intended to refer to the drawing under discussion and do not limit the orientation of the invention. For example, a vertical impeller shaft rotation axis is generally shown throughout the drawings, but it is likewise possible that other orientations could be used where appropriate. Throughout the respective drawing views, the same reference numbers are used where possible to refer to the same or functionally similar elements.
Referring FIG. 1., an advantageous configuration of an impeller comprises two symmetrical blades 1 arranged diametrically opposite one another (offset by 180°) and attached to a rotatable driving shaft 2 by a hub 3. Each blade 1 is bent along a line at the radially outer edge of the blade 1 by an angle 4. This bend at angle 4 helps to reduce local dissipation of energy on the blade edge, where the linear speed of the blade 1 is greater.
In addition, each blade 1 is sloped forward, toward the flow by an angle 5. This angle 5 positions blade 1 to define an inclined plane, which with rotation of shaft 2 induces an axial component of fluid flow. Depending upon the direction of rotation, the axial flow component produced by the inclination angle 5 of blade 1 can be in one axial direction or the other relative to shaft 2, i.e., up or down in
According to another aspect, the diameter 6 of the impeller stage is made equal to the impeller blade projected height 7, namely the axial extension of blade 1 along shaft 2. This is a proportion of blade projection relative to diameter, and effectively causes the impeller blade 1 to intercept a relatively large volume of product during mixing. As a result, local impeller energy dissipation is substantially reduced relative to conventional arrangements, by distributing the rotational energy applied to shaft 2 over a large volume. As a result, the impeller is advantageous for mixing shear-sensitive fluids and products.
The bend lines to form angle 4 are located on diameter 8 which is particularly located in the range of 70 to 80% of the impeller outside diameter. On the inside edge of blades 1, a secure attachment to hub 3 may be achieved by means of hub ear 9 and bolts 10. Other attachment arrangements are possible such as welding on a surface of hub 3, insertion in a slot (not shown) along hub 3, etc. Plural impellers mounted on shaft 2 are spaced by distance 11, two being shown for example. The number of impellers or impeller stages on shaft 2 is only limited by vessel geometry.
The radially outer part of the blade, between angle 4 and the free radially outer edge of blade 1, is preferably oriented outward of the flow or on the trailing side of the impeller blade. That is, as the impeller turns, the radially outer part forms a wing that resides angularly behind the part of the blade that is radially nearer to the shaft 2 than angle 4. This eases the shear along the radially outermost edge as compared to a similar arrangement in which the angle 4 is zero. If the configuration shown is operated in the reverse of that rotation direction, the radially outermost edge becomes the leading part of the blade and tends to scoop material in front of the impeller blade, which and is less preferred. In either direction, the impeller blade produces axial flow due to the inclination angle 5.
In the embodiment of
The asymmetrical impeller is advantageously employed in a vessel with a limited nozzle size (the nozzle being the entry opening at the flange end of the vessel). As seen in
As shown in
Particularly in embodiments with a centrally mounted shaft 2 carrying impellers 17, the vessel can have one or more vertical baffles 16. A plurality of vertical baffles 17 can be provided, each comprising a plate or other structure extending axially and disposed radially inwardly from inside of the vessel wall. Normally, arrangements with off-center mounting of shaft 2 provide good mixing without the need for such baffles.
In
The invention having been disclosed and illustrated by examples, various modifications and variations can be seen as possible in light of the above teachings. It should be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments specifically used as examples, and reference should be made to the appended claims to assess the scope of the invention in which exclusive rights are claimed.
This application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/485,585, filed Jul. 8, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2074387 | Gill | Mar 1937 | A |
3149888 | Lennon | Sep 1964 | A |
5253980 | Nishioka et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5399014 | Takata et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5472278 | Kawaoka et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5762417 | Essen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6331071 | Akamikne et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6508583 | Shankwitz et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
20030007417 | Miyata et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050007874 | Roszczenko et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3817380 | Dec 1988 | DE |
5-103965 | Apr 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050007874 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60485585 | Jul 2003 | US |