This application is a national stage of PCT/FR02/01890 filed Jun. 4, 2002 and based upon French Application No. 01/07478 filed Jun. 8, 2001, based upon French Application No. 01/11569 filed on Sep. 7, 2001, and based upon French Application No. 01/15288 filed on Nov. 27, 2001 under the International Convention.
The present invention relates to the field of low shelter swimming-pool roofing and, in particular, swimming-pool roofing with moveable components.
Several types of roofing for swimming pools exist in the prior art, but the present invention concerns, in particular, swimming pool roofing that are generally referred to as “low shelter”, comprising roof elements arranged in a juxtaposed manner along the length of the swimming pool and each able to perform a rotational movement on one of their longitudinal sides so as to be able to partially open, and thus, give access to the water in the swimming pool. For a better understanding of the claimed subject matter, it should be noted that the longitudinal, transversal and lateral positions of the roof elements and/or their constitutive parts are considered relative to the longitudinal, lateral and transversal axes of the pool. The roof elements are of the type each having a cover formed of panels of translucent material, such as double-walled polycarbonate, and with a rigid frame that can be light and resistant to support the transparent cover, The frame can be formed of arcs arranged in transversal planes and spaced by cross-ties with two longitudinal end cross-ties defining two longitudinal sides with the roof element. These two longitudinal sides rest on the edges of the pool defining a support surface for the roof elements. The support edges of these roof elements are usually constituted by the longitudinal edges of the swimming pool.
In order to partially open such a swimming pool roofing system partially and to and enjoy the fresh air, the roof elements are individually partially opened in order to modulate the opening of the pool to the outside environment. In order to do this, at least one of the longitudinal sides of the frame of the roof elements is mounted in an articulated arrangement around a fixation lug anchored in the support edges of the pool in an angular expansion plane. The other side is intended to receive two struts with their heads penetrating each extremity of the side with their feet then resting on the support edges of the pool to block the struts between the edges of the pool and the roof element, which is thus maintained in an inclined position relative to the ground, as required by a partially opened configuration. This fixed arrangement of a low shelter roof system in a partially open position has the following disadvantages:
it limits opening the pool roofing system to grant access to the pool to the limited access provided by merely moving a roof element to the partially open and fixed position;
for handling purposes, it requires the use of two struts as lever arms for each of the roof elements;
it often requires two people to lift each roof element to the partially open position;
it exposes the partially open roof elements to wind, that tends to destabilize them;
it takes a relatively long time to install, particularly when there are several roof elements; and
it has other disadvantages.
Many improvements have been added in recent years to simplify the lifting operation for the roof elements using a sliding strut along the side acting as lever by applying a lifting effort at the middle of the side, or furthermore with the help of various lifting systems to reduce effort.
Despite these various innovations making significant improvements for moving the roof elements from a closed position to a partly open position, the applicant has noted that the opening of the roof elements of a swimming pool roof system remains a difficult handling operation. Even though the process has been simplified, the weight of the roof elements still renders this process difficult and strenuous. This handling even becomes a major problem when the swimming pool and the roof elements covering it are of large dimensions, or when it is necessary to lift several of them.
Starting from this, the applicant has envisaged a new roofing concept for swimming pools, combining the advantages of low shelters with roof elements articulated along their longitudinal sides with those of high shelters with telescopic roof elements.
According to the invention, the swimming pool roof system for low shelters of the type where each constituent roof element is composed of a cover resting on a frame formed of two arcs, which transverse the pool, and separated by longitudinal cross-ties with two longitudinal parallel sides, with at least one of them mounted in an articulated way relative to the edge of the pool so that the roof element can move from a closed position to a partially open position, is notable in that the above-mentioned swimming pool roof system includes, along at least one portion of its length, juxtaposed roof elements whose distance can be defined by the external cord of the two longitudinal sides resting on the support edge of the pool and linking the two arcs is less than the distance defined by the internal cord of the two longitudinal sides resting on the support edge of the pool and connecting the two arcs of the juxtaposed roof elements of the other portion of the swimming pool roof system to enable nesting of the first portion of roof elements in the second portion of roof elements to partially open up the swimming pool along a length depending on the displacement of the mobile portion of roof elements. In such a system, the first roof elements can be relatively smaller than the second roof elements so that the first roof elements can be nested underneath the second roof elements.
This new concept of a swimming pool roof system for low shelters is of great interest since it provides the double possibility of opening up the swimming pool either on one side or the other along the longitudinal plane of the pool by tilting the roof elements either from one side or from the other of the swimming pool by displacement of one portion of roof elements into the other portion of roof elements. Furthermore, the arrangement of associating several roof elements one behind the other in a mobile portion, makes it possible to have nesting in two widths only, thus limiting the dimensions on the support surface and even providing the possibility of making the whole roofing assembly rest on the curb of the swimming pool.
The applicant has envisaged several variants of this above-mentioned concept in its most elementary expression.
Thus, according to a first variant with two possibilities, either the portion with the relatively smaller roof elements is mounted so as to be mobile along and/or outside of the swimming pool and is displaced beneath the portion of relatively larger roof elements to be partially or totally covered by the latter, or the inverse, where the portion with the relatively larger roof elements is mounted in a mobile way along and/or outside the swimming pool and is displaced above the portion of the relatively smaller roof elements which it covers partially or totally.
According to another variant with two possibilities, when the swimming pool roof system includes a single mobile portion of roof elements, the roof elements can preferably be situated at one end of the swimming pool. On the other hand, when the swimming pool roof system includes two mobile portions of roof elements, the roof elements can preferably be situated at the two ends of the swimming pool. In the first configuration, the mobile portion of roof elements can be displaced from one end of the swimming pool which it opens up progressively towards the other end which remains closed. In an alternative configuration where the other portion of fixed roof elements is set, such as in the second arrangement, the two mobile portions of roof elements can be moved towards each other, progressively opening up the two ends of the swimming pool, and towards the middle of the latter which remains closed and where the central portion of fixed roof elements is to be found.
Even though the fundamental concepts of the invention have been described above, other details and characteristics of the invention will appear more clearly by reading the following description given as a non-limiting example and relative to the appended drawings, of an embodiment of a swimming pool roof system according to the invention.
a and 8b are partial views in perspective of two adjoining arcs of two swimming pool roof elements of a same portion, shown in two different positions.
a is a partial view in vertical section of the two portions of swimming pool roof elements of the drawing of
b is a view following A of the drawing of
The drawing in
As can be seen in the drawing of
The drawing of
Advantageously, the two longitudinal sides 220a′ and 220b′ of the roof elements I′ of the portion P′ rest on the support edge S of the pool via rolling or any other suitable displacement means, as shown in the drawing of
As can be seen in the drawing of
The roof elements I′ of the mobile portion P′ include mutual linking structure that can be dissociable, on the one hand, to allow their free articulation (arrow A of
According to a first preferred embodiment of the swimming pool roof system, the above-mentioned mutual linking structure can include wings of the arcs 210′ that can be arranged to at least partially extend or overhang the prolongation of the panels of translucent material cover 100′ to ensure partial sealed covering of the juxtaposed roof elements I′ of the swimming pool roof system T′ in closed position, are provided with a removable device for solidarization with the arc 210′ of the adjacent roof element I′. This removable solidarization device (not shown) can be adapted by those skilled in the art, for example with a male-female assembly preformed respectively in the faces in contact with the wings and the arcs 210.
According to a second preferred embodiment of the swimming pool roof system, shown in more detail in the drawings of
According to a further preferred embodiment of the swimming pool roof system, the arcs 210 of the roof elements I of the fixed portion P have the same radius of curvature as the arcs 210‘of the roof elements I’ of the mobile portion P′. Thus, with the same arcs 210 and even the same roof elements I, it is possible to produce either fixed roof elements I or mobile roof elements I′. In order to respect the concept of the invention which consists, at the level of their bearing on the support edge S, in differentiating the distance defined by the external cord of the two longitudinal sides 220a′ and 220b′ of the juxtaposed roof elements I′ of the mobile portion P′, from the distance defined by the internal cord of the two longitudinal sides 220a and 220b of the juxtaposed roof elements I of the other portion P, the applicant has envisaged profiling the two longitudinal sides 220a, 220b and 220a′, 220b′ of the roof elements I and I′ so as to receive in a removable and/or adjustable manner, either the fixation lugs 300a of the roof elements I on the support edge S, or the displacement means 320a′ of the roof elements I′ along the edge S.
As can be seen on the drawing of
It is to be noted that the longitudinal sides 220a, 220b and 220a′, 220b′ are preformed to receive the fixation means 310a and the rolling means 320a′, around axes parallel to the longitudinal axis of the pool, in such a way as to adapt to the different radii of the curvature of the arcs in function of the width of the pools. Therefore, whatsoever the curvature of the arcs, it will be possible to use the same fixation means 310a and rolling means 320a′, then suitably placed by adjusting the angle of inclination correctly following the profile of the longitudinal sides.
According to a second form of embodiment of the swimming pool roof system, shown in the drawing of
The end cross-tie 220a of the portion P is preformed differently from that of the standard cross-tie 220a′ by adopting a profile that is preferably hollow and bent with two branches 220a1 and 220a2 with an obtuse angle making it possible to ensure simultaneously both a lateral displacement towards the external side of the roof element I′ or the swimming pool roof system from the position of the coupling organ 222a, and a vertical displacement upwards, from the position of the inclined groove 221a while still respecting the angle of inclination of the latter. The first branch 220a1 of the elbow-shaped profile forming the longitudinal side 220a and receiving at its low part the coupling organ 222a is narrow and set vertically like a post with an inclination closely adapted to the radius of curvature of the panels, and the second branch 220a2 receiving at its top part the inclined groove 221a, takes the shape of a cone with its small base being along the prolongation of the first vertical branch 220a1 while the big base receives at its top part the above-mentioned inclined groove 221a. By simply replacing the profile of the longitudinal sides 220a′ and 220b′ of the roof element I′ by that of the longitudinal sides 220a and 220b such as shown in the drawing of
In order to allow easy release of the fixation lugs 300a from the coupling organs 222a′, especially when different roof elements I′ are coupled together by U-shaped profiles 211′, it is envisaged to truncate the cylindrical end 301a′ of the fixation lugs 300a′ along an oblique plane parallel to the longitudinal axis of the side 220a′ so as to enable passage of the truncated cylindrical end 301a′ of the fixation lug 300a′ by opening the longitudinal groove 222a′. In fact, once the fixation lug 300a′ is separated from its securement on the edge S of the pool, it suffices to tilt it upwards to disengage it from the runner of the coupling organ 222a.
In order to correct the significant lateral misalignments of the mobile portion P′, during its displacements D inside the fixed portion P along the longitudinal axis of the swimming pool, the applicant has also envisaged installing a guide device 500 shown in the drawing of
on the one hand, at least one but preferably two guide rollers 510a′ and 510b′ engaged in free rotation around two vertical axes associated with the end arc 210‘of the mobile portion P’ extending along the fixed portion P and at the level of the two longitudinal sides 220a′ and 220b′ of the mobile portion P′, in such a way that the rolling strips 511a′ and 511b′ of the guide rollers 510a′ and 510b′ overhang the longitudinal sides 220a′ and 220b′ facing the two longitudinal sides 220a and 220b of the fixed portion P while still being supported on the cross-ties formed by said longitudinal sides 220a and 220b or on the panels (100) forming a runway along the length of displacement of the mobile portion P′.
and on the other hand, at least one but preferably two counter-guide rollers 520a and 520b engaged in free rotation around two vertical axes associated with the end arc 210 of the fixed portion P along which the mobile portion P′ moves and at the level of the two longitudinal sides 220a and 220b in such a way that the rolling strips 521a and 521b of the counter-guide rollers 520a and 520b overhang the vertical plane of the longitudinal sides 220a and 220b facing the two longitudinal sides 220a′ and 220b′ of the mobile portion P′ while still being supported on the cross-ties formed by said longitudinal sides 220a′ and 220b′ or on the panels 100‘of the mobile portion P’ forming a runway along the length of displacement of the latter. Preferably, the axes of the two counter-guide rollers 520a and 520b are maintained at the level of the end arc of the fixed portion P, in a vertical position, by means of a fixation in the longitudinal edge S of the swimming pool.
The drawing of
The pair of guide rollers 510a′ and 510b′ associated with the pair of counter-guide rollers 520a and 520b forming the guiding device 500 have the great advantage of being able to automatically adjust the lateral misalignments of displacements D of the mobile portion P′ relative to the fixed portion P. Furthermore, when the two guide rollers 510a′ and 510b′ engaged in rotation around two associated axes of the end arc 210‘of the mobile portion P’ are partially set (as shown in the drawing of
It is evident that that the device 500 can be modified following several adaptations while still remaining within the context of the present invention, adaptations consisting, for example:
of adopting the same principle when the portion P is mobile and covers the fixed portion P′,
of not limiting the number of rollers when the swimming pool roof elements have greater dimensions,
of envisaging other guide rollers or counter-guide rollers set along the length of the end arcs, for example in such a way as to bear on the cross-ties 220 and/or the panels 100 of the other portion P,
of motorizing at least the guide and counter-guide rollers in order to control the displacements D of the mobile portion,
of setting the axes of the guide rollers 220a′ and 220b′ along a significantly inclined axis relative to the vertical in such a way that the rolling strips 511a′ and 511b′ of said guide rollers bear on the longitudinal sides 220a and 220b of the fixed portion while still ensuring guiding, the bearing of the mobile portion P′ thus replacing or substituting the above-mentioned rolling means 320a′ allowing displacements D.
It is understood that the swimming pool roofing T described and shown above, is presented as a divulgation and not as a limitation. Evidently, various arrangements, modifications and improvements can be added to the above example, without in any way extending beyond the framework of the invention taken in its widest aspects and meaning.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
01 07478 | Jun 2001 | FR | national |
01 11569 | Sep 2001 | FR | national |
01 15288 | Nov 2001 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR02/01890 | 6/4/2002 | WO | 00 | 12/8/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/101178 | 12/19/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2610366 | McKee et al. | Sep 1952 | A |
2728115 | Cornelius | Dec 1955 | A |
3009211 | Hansen et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
3028872 | Cresswell | Apr 1962 | A |
3443265 | Hauck | May 1969 | A |
4175361 | Kumode | Nov 1979 | A |
4783861 | Leurent | Nov 1988 | A |
4807312 | Baus | Feb 1989 | A |
4876828 | Brill | Oct 1989 | A |
5156195 | Wehler et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 572 114 | Apr 1986 | FR |
2 776 000 | Sep 1999 | FR |
2 781 511 | Jan 2000 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040187397 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |