Low sidelobe contiguous-parabolic reflector array

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6563473
  • Patent Number
    6,563,473
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 22, 2002
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 13, 2003
    23 years ago
Abstract
An antenna array of parabolic rectangular reflectors for use in satellite communications. The antenna comprises two parabolic reflectors disposed contiguously on a common outer surface. The common surface forms a continuous antenna aperture. The parabolic reflectors have rectangular side edges which permit the adjacent edges of the parabolic reflectors to be spaced closely. The mouth of each parabolic reflector is focussed on a separate feed. The focus of the feed is not located at the center of the reflector but rather offset. The antenna feeds and the reflector foci are displaced toward the center of the array such that the spacing between the antenna feeds is less than half the length of the antenna. The present invention provides the displacement of each reflector focal point and each antenna feed toward the center of the array.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the use of parabolic reflectors in an antenna system for use in broadband satellite communications. More specifically, the invention relates to an antenna array of parabolic rectangular reflectors having antenna feeds which are offset in order to reduce antenna sidelobe levels.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In the field of satellite communications, antenna systems for satellite communication are required to have a broad bandwidth while having a narrow antenna beam width. The broad bandwidth enables the antenna system to both transmit and receive signals over frequency bands of several GHz. The narrow antenna beam width provides a high gain for signals that are received and transmitted over a particular frequency to and from a particular satellite, and provides discrimination between satellites.




Although the antenna beam width is usually focussed on a particular satellite, it may also be necessary to alter the focus of the antenna beam toward another satellite.




Due to the high speed at which aircraft travel, antenna systems which are mounted on aircraft are required to maintain a low profile. The low profile minimizes drag. Typically, an antenna system is placed within a radome that has a height restriction in the range of 4 inches to 12 inches depending on the type of aircraft.




Single parabolic reflectors are not ideal for use in applications requiring a low profile. This is due in part to the fact that a parabolic reflector has a low aspect ratio—it is difficult to optimally illuminate the entire reflector surface when the ratio of the aperture width to height is large. In order to illuminate the entire surface of the parabolic reflector, the reflector itself must be distanced from the reflector feed. For example, a parabolic reflector having a surface width of 28 inches would typically require the feed to be placed at least 10 inches from the reflector. This is well beyond the height restriction of the radome on an aircraft. Regardless of whether the feed is axial or offset, inside the radome, the geometry of a single parabolic reflector is less than ideal for use on an aircraft fuselage.




The use of contiguously disposed parabolic reflectors produces a high gain and a narrow central beamwidth. However, two large sidelobes are produced—one on either side of the antenna beam peak. The sidelobes are introduced due to the modulation of the aperture illumination resultant from the radiation pattern of the antenna feeds. Techniques are required to minimize the impact of modulation, resulting from the aperture illumination, and provide lower sidelobes on either side of the main antenna beam when utilizing an array of contiguously disposed parabolic reflectors.




U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,312, issued to Lord, discloses an antenna system with a plurality of reflectors for generating a plurality of beams. Lord teaches an antenna system comprising a first reflector and a second reflector, as well as corresponding first and second feeds. While the two feeds are offset from their respective reflectors, the first and the second reflector are in a substantially tandem arrangement and not contiguously disposed in array. Rather, Lord teaches a compact antenna configuration whereby the first reflector and the first feed cooperate to form a first antenna beam and the second reflector and the second feed form a second beam. Lord does not discuss the formation of a main antenna beam in which the antenna sidelobe levels may be reduced by displacing the feeds and the foci of the respective reflectors.




U.S. Pat. No. 6,262,689, issued to Yamamoto, discloses an antenna system for communicating with low earth orbit satellites from the ground. In one embodiment, Yamamoto teaches the use of two reflectors separated by a predetermined distance, each reflector having a primary feed for radiating a beam onto its respective reflector, and a switching means to switch the antenna focus between various satellites. However, Yamamoto teaches the tracking of two satellites, one by each of the reflector/feed systems. The Yamamoto patent does not disclose an antenna system which reduces the sidelobe level of the antenna beam.




In view of the above shortcomings of the prior art, the present invention seeks to provide an array of two antenna elements, wherein each antenna element has a feed that is displaced toward the center of the antenna array. Furthermore, the present invention seeks to provide an antenna system utilizing feedhorns, parabolic reflectors, a common aperture surface, and several pairs of contiguously disposed reflectors having displaced feeds to reduce antenna sidelobe levels. Moreover, the present invention seeks to provide an antenna array of parabolic reflectors with lower sidelobes adjacent to the main antenna beam.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is an antenna array of parabolic rectangular reflectors for use in satellite communications. The antenna comprises two parabolic reflectors disposed contiguously on a common outer surface. The common surface forms a continuous antenna aperture. The parabolic reflectors have rectangular side edges which permit the adjacent edges of the parabolic reflectors to be spaced closely. The mouth of each parabolic reflector is focussed on a separate feed. The focus of the feed is not located at the center of the reflector but rather offset. The antenna feeds and the reflector foci are displaced toward the center of the array such that the spacing between the antenna feeds is less than half the length of the antenna. The present invention provides the displacement of each reflector focal point and each antenna feed toward the center of the array.




According to the present invention, the antenna feeds are excited coherently in order to produce a narrow well focussed beam. Support struts, located between the feeds and their respective parabolic reflector, are designed such that they minimize the blockage of the antenna aperture. In one embodiment, the antenna array may be mounted on the fuselage of an aircraft. The antenna is steered mechanically in elevation and azimuth to maintain the antenna attitude directed toward a particular satellite at all times. Finally, the displacement of the antenna feeds and reflector foci result in lower sidelobes adjacent to the main antenna beam.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The invention will now be described with reference to the drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a side view of the antenna system having parabolic reflectors disposed contiguously in a linear array of the prior art;





FIG. 2

is a bottom view of the antenna system of

FIG. 1

of the prior art;





FIG. 3

is a bottom view of the antenna system of

FIG. 1

, further including a power splitter/combiner, of the prior art;





FIG. 4

is a schematic side view of an antenna system having two parabolic reflectors with offset foci and antenna feeds located at each of the offset foci according to the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a bottom view of the antenna system of

FIG. 4

of the present invention; and





FIG. 6

is a front view of an antenna system having a plurality of parabolic reflectors with offset foci and antenna feeds displaced toward the center of the antenna array according to an alternative of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1

illustrates a side view of the antenna system


5


of the prior art. The antenna system


5


consists of four antenna elements


10


,


20


,


30


,


40


, and four antenna element feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


, respectively. The antenna elements are identical. The antenna element


10


is comprised of a rectangular parabolic reflector


90


and a support strut


100


. The antenna element


20


has both a rectangular parabolic reflector


110


and a support strut


120


. The antenna element


30


has both a rectangular parabolic reflector


130


and a support strut


140


. Finally, the antenna element


40


has both a rectangular parabolic reflector


150


and a support strut


160


.




It should be further explained that the rectangular parabolic reflectors


90


,


110


,


130


,


150


have a rectangular side edge configuration. The rectangular parabolic reflector differs from the conventional parabolic reflectors which have a circular or an elliptical edge configuration. The rectangular edge configuration permits the parabolic reflectors


90


,


110


,


130


,


150


, to be adjacent, without gaps, forming a larger common rectangular aperture. The contiguous disposition of the parabolic reflectors


90


,


110


,


130


,


150


is one factor which contributes to an optimal illumination of the antenna array and to the antenna system


5


having a low profile. Each rectangular parabolic reflector shown in

FIG. 1

has a central focus point that is facing directly in line with a corresponding antenna feed.




The support struts


100


,


120


,


140


,


160


are support members for the feeds. However, the support struts are non-essential elements in that the element feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


may be attached to the parabolic reflectors


90


,


110


,


130


,


150


by other means. The support struts


100


,


120


,


140


,


160


are designed to provide for minimal blockage of the paraboloidal apertures so as not to interfere with the element feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


.




The element feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


each transmit a guided wave deriving, for instance, from a coaxial cable. Alternatively, the element feeds receive an unguided wave propagating through space. An unguided wave reflects off the parabolic reflector surface and would then be received at the element feed. To transmit a guided wave, each element feed is excited in phase through a power splitting/combining means, shown in FIG.


3


. As each element feed is excited, the combined radiation pattern of the antenna elements produces a narrow beam.




The “front” of each parabolic reflector


90


,


110


,


130


,


150


forms part of the common aperture surface


170


. The concave surface of each parabolic reflector


90


,


110


,


130


,


150


faces the common aperture surface


170


. This common aperture surface


170


enables the rectangular parabolic reflectors to form a continuous antenna aperture in order to further narrow and focus the antenna beam.





FIG. 2

, of the prior art, illustrates a bottom view of the antenna system


5


described in FIG.


1


. In

FIG. 2

, the common aperture surface


170


is attached to each of the support struts


100


,


120


,


140


,


160


each of which are attached to the element feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


. The central foci of each reflector is directly above the element feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


.





FIG. 3

illustrates the antenna system


5


of

FIG. 1 and 2

of the prior art in combination with a power splitter/combiner. In

FIG. 3

, the power splitter/combiner is shown as two separate elements, although they may be one element. The power divider


300


has four connections


310


A,


310


B,


310


C,


310


D, which are connected to the antenna feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


, respectively. The four connections


310


A,


310


B,


310


C,


310


D may be a coaxial cable or any other connecting means. The power divider


300


also has an input beam port


320


. The use of four connections


310


A,


310


B,


310


C,


310


D enables the antenna system


5


to form an antenna beam which utilizes all of the parabolic reflectors.




The power combiner


330


also has four connections


340


A,


340


B,


340


C,


340


D, each of which are connected to antenna feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


, respectively. The antenna feeds each have two connections. The antenna feed


50


is attached to the power combiner


330


through a connection


340


A and to the power splitter


300


through a connection


310


A. The antenna feed


60


is attached to the power combiner


330


through a connection


340


B and to the power splitter


300


through a connection


310


B. The antenna feed


70


is attached to the power combiner


330


through a connection


340


C and to the power splitter


300


through a connection


310


C. Accordingly, the antenna feed


80


is attached to the power combiner


330


through a connection


340


D and to the power splitter


300


through a connection


310


D.




Also, each antenna feed


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


has two connections which are attached at respective input/output ports. In

FIG. 3

, the antenna feed


50


has an input port


350


A which is coupled to the connection


310


A and in turn connected to the power splitter


300


. The power splitter sends a signal and the required input power to the antenna feed


50


. The antenna feed


50


has an output port


350


B which is coupled to the connection


340


A and in turn connected to the power combiner


330


. There may be more than one output port at each antenna feed. Each output port represents a particular horizontal or vertical polarisation. The horizontal and vertical polarisation permits the antenna feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


to excite the antenna elements at various phases. As such, through the appropriate phase and amplitude combining of each of the element feeds


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


, the antenna elements


10


,


20


,


30


,


40


may be excited in combination such that they produce an antenna beam that may be focussed in various directions.




While

FIG. 3

only shows two connections to each element feed


50


,


60


,


70


,


80


, there may be more than one output connection to the power combiner


330


. Each additional output connection would be coupled to a separate power combiner. Each additional power combiner would also be connected to the main transceiver equipment located on the aircraft. In a dual-band system each element feed would have four connections corresponding to a horizontal and a vertical polarisation for each of the two bands.




Also, an output beam port


360


is connected to the power combiner


330


. Both the input beam port


320


and the output beam port


360


may be coupled to the aircraft transceiver equipment that uses the antenna system.





FIG. 4

illustrates an antenna array


400


similar to the prior art, yet in contrast, the antenna elements, belonging to the antenna array


400


, have offset antenna element foci and antenna feeds which are displaced in order to reduce antenna sidelobe levels. According to the present invention, the antenna array


400


of

FIG. 4

consists of two antenna elements


410


,


415


and two antenna feeds


420


,


425


. The antenna element


410


further comprises a rectangular parabolic reflector


430


and a support strut


440


. Similarly, the antenna element


420


comprises a rectangular parabolic reflector


450


and a support strut


460


.




In contrast to

FIG. 1

,

FIG. 4

illustrates the use of an offset reflector focus point. The antenna feed


420


and the focus point


470


of the parabolic reflector


430


are not at the centre of the antenna element


410


. Rather, the antenna feed


420


and the focus point


470


are displaced toward the centre of the rectangular aperture of the parabolic reflector


430


(shown clearly in FIG.


5


). The antenna feed


425


and the focus point


480


are also displaced toward the centre of the rectangular aperture of the parabolic reflector


450


. In fact, both antenna feeds


420


,


425


and correspondingly both focus points


470


,


480


have been displaced such that they are closer to the centre point


490


of the antenna array


400


.





FIG. 5

is a bottom view of the antenna array


400


which illustrates the spacing between antenna feeds


420


,


425


according to the present invention. Similar to the prior art, the “front” of the each parabolic reflector


430


,


450


forms part of a common aperture surface


500


. The common The common aperture surface


500


is comprised of two rectangular aperture surfaces


500


A,


500


B and having a particular antenna system length


510


. Each of the two rectangular aperture surfaces


500


A,


500


B correspond to each of the two antenna elements


410


,


415


, respectively. As opposed to the antenna feed


420


being located in the centre of the rectangular aperture


500


A it is instead displaced toward the centre of the common aperture surface


500


. The antenna feed


430


is also displaced toward the centre of the common aperture surface


500


. The antenna feeds


420


,


425


, are displaced towards the centre of the antenna array


400


such that the spacing between the antenna feeds


420


,


425


, is less than half the antenna system length


510


. The displacement of the parabolic reflector foci


470


,


480


, correspond to the offset antenna feed positions. As such, the parabolic reflector foci


470


,


480


are displaced towards the centre of the antenna array


400


such that the spacing


520


between the reflector foci


470


,


480


is less than half the antenna system length


510


.




According to the present invention, the displacement of the antenna feeds


420


,


425


and the reflector foci


470


,


480


reduces the antenna sidelobes adjacent to the main antenna beam of the antenna radiation pattern. In a dual-parabolic antenna system, the beamwidth of each individual parabolic reflector remains constant while the phase centers of their antenna beam are moved closer together. Thus, the first sidelobes, also termed grating lobes, are pushed further from the main antenna beam and suppressed by the narrow radiation pattern of the individual parabolic reflectors


430


,


450


.





FIG. 6

is a frontal view of an antenna array


600


according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention. The antenna array


600


consists of four antenna elements


610


,


620


,


630


,


640


and four antenna feeds


650


,


660


,


670


,


680


. Each of the four antenna elements are comprised of both a parabolic reflector (similar to that of

FIG. 1

) and a support strut. Each of the four support struts


700


,


710


,


720


,


730


are each connected to the antenna feeds


650


,


660


,


670


,


680


, respectively.




According to this embodiment, the feed spacings are not uniform, in that the feed spacing


740


, between the antenna feeds


660


and


670


, is closer than the feed spacing


750


, between the antenna feeds


650


and


660


. Each of the four antenna feeds


650


,


660


,


670


,


680


are displaced toward the centre of the antenna array


600


. In this alternative embodiment, the feed spacing between antenna feeds, in an array of more than two antenna elements, would be less than the length


760


of a rectangular aperture surface


770


for a single antenna element. Typically, the average spacing between antenna feeds would be lower than that obtained with conventional feed spacings since at the very least the two outer feeds


650


,


680


would be displaced towards the centre of the array


600


.

FIG. 6

further illustrates an antenna array in which all of the antenna feeds are displaced towards the centre of the array. The reflector foci of each of the four antenna elements


610


,


620


,


630


,


640


are displaced toward the centre of the array. As such, the sidelobe levels of the main antenna beam are suppressed by the narrow radiation pattern of the individual antenna elements


610


,


620


,


630


,


640


.




It should be mentioned that the antenna feeds of both the antenna array


400


and the antenna array


600


may be connected to a power splitter


300


and power combiner


330


of FIG.


3


. However, the power splitter


300


and the power combiner


330


need not be two separate units but rather a single power splitting/combining unit.




Although the antenna system is advantageous for use on an aircraft, the present invention also lends itself to applications on vehicles or at various stations on the ground that are in communication with satellites.



Claims
  • 1. An antenna array including:a common aperture surface; and two parabolic rectangular reflectors, each parabolic rectangular reflector having a concave side, each parabolic rectangular reflector being disposed contiguously in a linear array forming a larger common rectangular aperture without gaps in illumination, the two parabolic reflectors being disposed on either side of a centre point of the antenna array, each parabolic rectangular reflector having a parabolic focus, each parabolic focus being displaced equally toward the center point of the antenna array, each parabolic reflector connected to either a first reflector feed or a second reflector feed, the first reflector feed being located at the parabolic focus of its corresponding parabolic reflector, the second reflector feed being located at the parabolic focus of its corresponding parabolic reflector, and the two parabolic rectangular reflectors being supported by the common aperture surface between the two parabolic rectangular reflectors and both the first reflector feed and the second reflector feed.
  • 2. An antenna array as defined in claim 1, further including a power splitting and combining means for feeding input power to the first reflector and the second reflector feed.
  • 3. An antenna array as defined in claim 1, wherein the antenna array is for use in satellite communications.
  • 4. An antenna array including:a common aperture surface; and at least two parabolic rectangular reflectors, each of the at least two parabolic rectangular reflectors having a concave side, each parabolic rectangular reflector being disposed contiguously in a linear array forming a larger common rectangular aperture without gaps in illumination, at least two parabolic reflectors being disposed on either end of a centre point of the antenna array, each parabolic rectangular reflector having a parabolic focus, at least two parabolic rectangular reflector having parabolic foci being displaced equally toward the center point of the antenna array, each parabolic reflector connected to a reflector feed, the reflector feed being located at the parabolic focus of its corresponding parabolic reflector, and the at least two parabolic rectangular reflectors being supported by the common aperture surface between the two parabolic rectangular reflectors and their respective antenna feed.
  • 5. An antenna array as defined in claim 4, further including a power splitting and combining means for feedinginput power to each reflector feed.
  • 6. An antenna array as defined in claim 4, wherein the antenna array is for use in satellite communications.
Parent Case Info

This application relates to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/270,193 filed Feb. 2, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (12)
Number Name Date Kind
3922682 Hyde Nov 1975 A
4407001 Schmidt Sep 1983 A
4535338 Ohm Aug 1985 A
5202700 Miller Apr 1993 A
5796370 Courtonne et al. Aug 1998 A
5859619 Wu et al. Jan 1999 A
5912645 Wight et al. Jun 1999 A
6031507 Aoki Feb 2000 A
6049312 Lord et al. Apr 2000 A
6052095 Ramanujam et al. Apr 2000 A
6262689 Yamamoto et al. Jul 2001 B1
6181293 Muhlhauser et al. Jan 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0 277 206 Aug 1993 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
High Aperture Efficiency, Wide Angle Scanning Offset Reflector—Craig et al, vol. 41, No. 11, pp 1481-1490, Nov./1993, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/270193 Feb 2001 US