Low sidestream smoke cigarette with combustible paper

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8267096
  • Patent Number
    8,267,096
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 13, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 18, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
A low sidestream smoke cigarette comprises a conventional tobacco rod, and a combustible treatment paper having a sidestream smoke treatment composition. The treatment composition comprises in combination, an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for said catalyst.
Description
BACKGROUND OF APPLICATION

1. Field of the Invention


The invention relates to sidestream smoke reduction in burning cigarettes and the like.


More particularly, the invention relates to a composition for use with cigarette paper, cigarette wrapper or wrapper for a cigar for treating and visibly reducing sidestream smoke.


2. Background of the Invention


Various attempts have been made to reduce or eliminate sidestream smoke emanating from a burning cigarette. The applicant developed various approaches to cigarette sidestream smoke control systems as described in its Canadian Patents 2,054,735 and 2,057,962; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,462,073 and 5,709,228 and published PCT Applications WO 96/22031; WO 98/16125 and WO 99/53778.


Other sidestream smoke control systems have been developed which use filter material or adsorptive material in the tobacco, filter or paper wrapper. Examples of these systems are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,755,207 and 4,225,636; EP Patent Application 0 740 907 and WO 99/53778. U.S. Pat. No. 2,755,207 describes a low sidestream smoke cigarette paper. The cigarette paper on burning yields a smoke substantially free of obnoxious components. The cigarette paper is cellulosic material in fibre form. It has intimately associated therewith a finely divided mineral type siliceous catalyst material. The cigarette paper which is essentially non-combustible and refractory remains substantially unchanged during combustion of the cigarette paper and functions like a catalyst in modifying the combustion of the paper. Suitable siliceous catalysts include acid-treated clays, heat-treated montmorillonite and natural and synthetic silicates containing some hydrogen atoms which are relatively mobile. Suitable mixed silica oxides include silica oxides with alumina, zirconia, titania, chromium oxide and magnesium oxide. Other silicas include the oxides of silicon and aluminum in a weight ratio of 9:1 of silica to alumina.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,225,636 describes the use of carbon in the cigarette paper to reduce organic vapour phase components and total particulate matter found in sidestream smoke. In addition, the carbon results in a substantial reduction in visible sidestream smoke emitting from a burning cigarette. Activated carbon is preferred as the carbon source. The use of the activated carbon results in a slight drop in visible sidestream smoke. Up to 50% of the cigarette paper may be finely divided carbon. The carbon-coated papers may be used as the inner wrap for the tobacco rod in combination with a conventional cigarette.


European Patent Application 0 740 907 published Nov. 6, 1996 describes the use of zeolites in the tobacco of the cigarette to alter the characteristics of the mainstream smoke and in particular remove various components from the mainstream smoke such as some of the tars. The zeolite as provided in the tobacco, also apparently change the characteristics of the sidestream smoke. The zeolites used were of a particle size between 0.5 mm to 1.2 mm.


Published PCT Patent Application WO 99/53778 describes a non-combustible sheet of treatment material for reducing sidestream smoke emissions. The sheet is used as a wrap and is applied over conventional cigarette paper of a conventional cigarette. The wrap has a very high porosity to allow the cigarette to burn at or close to conventional free-burn rates while at the same time reduce visible sidestream smoke emissions. The non-combustible wrap includes non-combustible ceramic fibres, non-combustible activated carbon fibres as well as other standard materials used in making the wrap. The wrap also includes zeolites or other similar sorptive materials and an oxygen donor/oxygen storage metal oxide oxidation catalyst. The non-combustible wrap provides an acceptable degree of sidestream smoke control; however, due to the non-combustible nature of the wrap, a charred tube remains.


U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,433,697 and 4,915,117 describe the incorporation of ceramic fibres in a cigarette paper manufacture. U.S. Pat. No. 4,433,697 describes at least 1% by weight of certain ceramic fibres in the paper furnish in combination with magnesium oxide and/or magnesium hydroxide fillers to reduce visible sidestream smoke emanating from the burning cigarette. The furnish of fibre pulp, ceramic fibres and fillers are used to make a paper sheet on conventional paper making machines. The ceramic fibres may be selected from the group of polycrystalline alumina, aluminum-silicate and amorphous alumina A filler of magnesium hydroxide or magnesium oxide is used and is coated on or applied to the fibres of the sheet.


Ito, U.S. Pat. No. 4,915,117 describes a non-combustible sheet for holding tobacco. The thin sheet is formed from ceramic materials which upon burning produces no smoke. The ceramic sheet comprises a woven or non-woven fabric of ceramic fibre or a mixture of paper and ceramics thermally decomposed at high temperature. The ceramic fibre may be selected from inorganic fibres such as silica fibre, silica-alumina fibre, alumina fibre, zirconia fibre, or alumino borosilicate and glass fibre. The ceramic sheet is formed by binding these materials by inorganic binders such as silica gel or alumina gel. The fibres are a preferably 1 to 10 micrometers in diameter.


Sol gels have been applied to conventional cigarette paper in order to reduce sidestream smoke, particularly sol gels made from a magnesium aluminate, calcium aluminate, titania, zirconia and aluminum oxide, as described in Canadian Patent 1,180,968 and Canadian Patent Application 2,010,575. Canadian Patent 1,180,968 describes the application of magnesium hydroxide in the form of an amorphous gel as a cigarette paper filler component to improve ash appearance and sidestream smoke reduction. The magnesium hydroxide gel is coated on or applied to the fibres of the sheet of the cigarette paper. Canadian Patent Application 2,010,575 describes the use of gels produced by a solution gelation or sol-gel process for controlling the combustion of wrappers for smoking articles. The gels may be applied as coatings to paper fibres before the paper is formed into wrappers. The wrappers are useful for reducing visible sidestream smoke. The metal oxides for the sol gels may be aluminum, titanium, zirconium, sodium, potassium or calcium.


Catalysts have also been directly applied to cigarette paper, such as described in Canadian Patent 604,895 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,386,838. Canadian Patent 604,895 describes the use of platinum, osmium, iridium, palladium, rhodium and ruthenium in the cigarette paper. These metals function as oxidation catalysts to treat vapours arising from combustion of the paper wrapper. Optimum catalytic effect has been provided by the metal palladium. The metal particles in a suitable medium are dispersed onto the face of a paper wrapper before it is applied to the cigarette.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,386,838 describes the use of a sol solution comprising a mixture of iron and magnesium as a smoke suppressive composition. The smoke suppressive composition is made by co-precipitating iron and magnesium from an aqueous solution in the presence of a base. The iron magnesium composition demonstrates high surface area of approximately 100 m2/g to approximately 225 m2/g when heated to a temperature between 100° C. and approximately 500° C. The iron magnesium composition may be added to paper pulp which is used to make smoke suppressive cigarette paper. The iron magnesium composition apparently functions as an oxidation catalyst and reduces the amount of smoke produced by the burning cigarette. The catalyst may also be applied to the tobacco, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,248,251, palladium, either in metallic form or as a salt, may be applied to the tobacco. The presence of palladium in tobacco reduces the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the mainstream smoke. Palladium is used in combination with an inorganic salt or nitric or nitrous acid. Such nitrates include lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, magnesium, calcium, strontium, lanthanum, cerium, neodymium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, erbium, scandium, manganese, iron, rhodium, palladium, copper, zinc, aluminum, gallium, tin, bismuth, hydrates thereof and mixtures thereof. Catalysts have also been used in tubes to reduce sidestream smoke such as described in published PCT Application WO 98/16125.


Catalytic materials have been used in aerosol types of cigarettes which do not produce sidestream or mainstream smoke per se, but instead a flavoured aerosol. Examples of these aerosol cigarettes include those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,040,551, 5,137,034 and 5,944,025, which use catalysts to provide the necessary heat generation to develop the aerosol. Such catalyst systems include oxides of cerium, palladium or platinum.


Although the prior art contemplates various sidestream smoke control systems, none of them have provided a system which effectively reduces sidestream smoke by simply incorporating active components in the combustible cigarette paper so that the cigarette burns like a normal cigarette without appreciably affecting cigarette taste. Accordingly, this invention provides a sidestream smoke control system which not only looks and tastes like a conventional cigarette but as well, in accordance with aspects thereof, ashes like a normal cigarette.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides for a significant reduction in sidestream smoke in its various applications. It has been found that such reduction in sidestream smoke can surprisingly be achieved by the combined use in a sidestream smoke treatment composition, of an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for the catalyst where said oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the cigarette. This composition may be used with normal combustible cigarette paper to provide acceptable free-burn rates while minimizing or virtually eliminating visible sidestream smoke.


The adjunct for the catalyst may be any suitable essentially non-combustible particulate material such as clays, carbon materials such as milled carbon fibres, mineral based materials such as metal oxides and metal oxide fibres, ceramics such as milled ceramic fibres and high surface area porous particles. In this respect, the catalyst adjunct is most preferably an essentially non-combustible high surface area sorptive material such as activated carbon or zeolites. In a most preferred embodiment of the invention, the sorptive materials are zeolites and in particular, hydrophobic zeolites. The zeolites are especially preferred when used in combination with a cerium based catalyst.


The sidestream smoke treatment composition may be applied in various ways. The composition may be used as a filler in the manufacture of a cigarette paper, impregnated in a cigarette paper, or as a coating(s) or a layer(s) on the exterior and/or interior of a cigarette paper. The resultant low sidestream smoke treatment cigarette paper may have a range of porosities from very low porosities of about 0.5 Coresta units through to high porosity of about 1,000 Coresta units. Preferred porosities are usually less than 200 Coresta units and most preferred porosities are usually in the range of about 30 to 60 Coresta units. It is appreciated that such treated paper may be used as a multiple wrap. The treated paper may be applied as an outer wrap over a cigarette having conventional cigarette paper.


The sidestream smoke treatment composition may be applied as a coating on both or either side of a paper for a multiple—usually a double-wrapped cigarette, or impregnated into the paper, or may be incorporated as a filler in the manufacture of the paper for single or multiple wraps of cigarette paper. In a double wrap arrangement, the sidestream smoke treatment composition may in one embodiment be sandwiched between two papers. In a further double wrap embodiment, the sidestream smoke treatment composition may be coated on the side of a paper adjacent the tobacco rod where different loadings of the composition sandwiched in between the two papers may be provided. In still a further double wrap embodiment, the sidestream smoke treatment composition may be coated onto both sides of the paper placed on the tobacco rod, where different loadings may be provided. A second paper may be used as a further wrap thereover. The cigarette treatment paper may have typical ashing characteristics which is a significant benefit over non-combustible cigarette tubes and wraps of the prior art. The treatment paper may be a conventional cellulose based cigarette paper which, with the treatment composition, surprisingly does not add to the sidestream smoke.


It has been found that in order to optimize sidestream smoke reduction, the catalyst and adjunct are used in combination. The two components may be co-mingled as a filler, for example, in the manufacture of cigarette paper. Alternatively, when used as a coating, the catalyst and the adjunct are also co-mingled, usually as a slurry, and applied as such. In respect of the preferred embodiments, and in particular, the combined use of cerium with zeolite, the materials may be applied as individual contacting thin layers to develop a multilayer coating. Such layers may be of a thickness usually less than that of conventional cigarette paper and due to their intimate contacting nature, function as though they were combined and co-mingled.


According to other aspects of the invention, a low sidestream smoke cigarette comprises a conventional tobacco rod and a combustible treatment paper having a sidestream smoke treatment composition for said rod, said treatment composition comprises in combination, an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for said catalyst where said oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the cigarette.


According to an aspect of the invention, a low sidestream smoke cigarette comprising a conventional tobacco rod, and a combustible treatment paper having a sidestream smoke treatment composition comprising cerium oxide which functions both as an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for the catalyst where said oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the cigarette. According to another aspect of the invention, a furnish composition for use in making a cigarette treatment paper for reducing sidestream smoke emitted from a burning cigarette comprises in combination an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct where said oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the cigarette.


According to a further aspect of the invention, a low sidestream smoke cigarette comprising a conventional tobacco rod, and a combustible treatment paper having a sidestream smoke treatment composition, said treatment composition comprising in combination, an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and an essentially non-combustible zeolite adjunct for said catalyst where said oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the cigarette.


According to a further aspect of the invention, a slurry composition for application to cigarette paper for reducing sidestream smoke emitted from a burning cigarette comprises in combination with an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst, an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for said catalyst where said oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the cigarette.


According to another aspect of the invention, a combustible cigarette paper for use on a smokable tobacco rod of a cigarette for reducing sidestream smoke emitted from a burning cigarette, the cigarette treatment paper including a sidestream smoke treatment composition comprising in combination an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct where said oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the cigarette.


According to another aspect of the invention, a method for reducing sidestream smoke emitted from a burning cigarette, comprises treating sidestream smoke with a treatment composition carried by a combustible cigarette paper, said treatment composition comprising in combination, an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for said catalyst where said oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the cigarette.


According to another aspect of the invention, a low sidestream smoke cigarette comprising a conventional tobacco rod and a combustible cigarette paper having and a sidestream smoke treatment composition associated with the cigarette paper, wherein said treatment composition reduces sidestream smoke by greater than about 90%. For ease of description, whenever the term cigarette is used, it is understood to not only include smokable cigarettes but as well any form of wrapped smokable tobacco product, such as cigars, or the like. Whenever the term treatment paper is used, it is understood to encompass combustible wrappers and the like which may be used on cigarettes, cigars and the like. The wrapper may be used as a single layer of cigarette paper or multiple layer of cigarette paper. The wrapper may be applied as the sole layer of cigarette paper or as a wrap over conventional cigarette paper of a cigarette. The treatment paper may include as its substrate conventional cigarette paper or similar combustible product with a wide range of porosities. The conventional tobacco rod encompasses tobacco compositions normally used in smokable cigarettes. These rods are to be distinguished from tobacco components used in aerosol cigarette.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a spray technique for applying the treatment composition to a cigarette paper;



FIG. 2 is a schematic view of extruding a film of the treatment composition onto the cigarette paper;



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of roll coating the treatment composition on cigarette paper;



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the impregnation of a coating of the treatment composition into the cigarette paper;



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of mixing the treatment composition with the paper pulp in the manufacture of cigarette paper;



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a tobacco rod having the treatment paper of this invention applied thereto;



FIG. 7 shows an alternative embodiment of FIG. 6;



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a tobacco rod having the treatment composition sandwiched between two layers of cigarette paper as applied to the tobacco rod; and



FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a double wrap for the tobacco rod where treatment paper is applied over conventional cigarette paper.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In its simplest form, the sidestream smoke treatment composition invention comprises, an oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst used in combination with a non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for the catalyst. It has been unexpectantly found that when these two components are used in combination either alone or with other constituents, a very surprising degree of sidestream smoke control is provided, without affecting the taste of the cigarette and, in most embodiments, without affecting the manner in which the cigarette burns. Furthermore, since this composition may be applied as a coating to or filler within the cigarette paper, the resultant low sidestream smoke cigarette looks like a conventional cigarette.


The adjunct may be any suitable essentially non-combustible, finely divided porous particulate material which does not affect the flavour and taste of the mainstream smoke and does not give off any undesirable odours in the sidestream vapours. The particulate material is physically stable at the elevated temperatures of the burning cigarette coal. The porous adjunct has a high surface area, usually in excess of about 20 m2/g of adjunct. In order for the particles to achieve such surface areas, they must be porous. Preferably, the porous adjunct has pores with an average diameter of less than 100 nm (1000 Å). More preferably, the pores have an average diameter of less than 20 nm (200 Å) and even more preferred are pores with an average diameter of 0.5 to 10 nm (5-100 Å). With zeolite based materials, the pores have an average diameter in the range of about 0.5 to 1.3 nm (5-13 Å).


It is preferred that the particulate adjunct has an average particle size of less than about 30 μm, more preferably less than about 20 μm and most preferably about 1 μm to 5 μm. Non-combustible materials may be porous clays of various categories commonly used in cigarette paper manufacture, such as the bentonite clays or treated clays having high surface areas. Non-combustible carbon materials may also be used including milled porous carbon fibres and particulates. Various metal oxides may be used such as porous monolithic mineral based materials which include zirconium oxide, titanium oxides, cerium oxides, aluminum oxides such as alumina, metal oxide fibres such as zirconium fibres and other ceramics such as milled porous ceramic fibres and mixtures thereof, such as zirconium/cerium fibres. In respect of cerium oxide, it has been found that it is capable of functioning as a finely divided adjunct and as an oxygen storage and donor cerium oxide oxidation catalyst. Other adjunct materials include high surface area materials such as activated carbon and zeolites.


The adjunct may also comprise high surface area highly sorptive materials which are non-combustible, inorganic finely divided particulate, such as molecular sieves which include zeolites and amorphous materials such as silica/alumina and the like. The most preferred are zeolites such as silicalite zeolites, faujasites X, Y and L zeolites, beta zeolites, Mordenite zeolites and ZSM zeolites. Preferred zeolites include hydrophobic zeolites and mildly hydrophobic zeolites which have affinity for hydrophobic and mildly hydrophobic organic compounds of such sidestream smoke. The zeolite materials provide a highly porous structure which selectively absorbs and adsorbs components of sidestream smoke. The highly porous structure generally comprises macropores amongst the particles and micropores within the particles which branch off of the macropores. It is believed that the captured components in the macropores and micropores in presence of the cerium oxide or other suitable oxidation catalysts at the high temperature of the burning cigarette, converts such captured components into oxidized compounds which continue to be trapped in the adsorbent material or are released as invisible gases which have sufficiently low tar and nicotine levels so that the sidestream is invisible or at a low desired level.


The zeolite materials may be characterized by the following formula:

MmM′nM″P[aAlO2.bSiO2.cTO2]

wherein


M is a monovalent cation,


M′ is a divalent cation,


M″ is a trivalent cation,


a, b, c, n, m, and p are numbers which reflect the stoichiometric proportions,


c, m, n or p can also be zero,


Al and Si are tetrahedrally coordinated Al and Si atoms, and


T is a tetrahedrally coordinated metal atom being able to replace Al or Si,


wherein the ratio of b/a of the zeolite or the zeolite-like material, has a value of about 5 to 300 and the micropore size is within the range of about 0.5 to 1.3 nm (5 to 13 Å).


Preferred zeolites of the above formula, have the specific formulas of faujasites ((Na2, Ca, Mg)29[Al58Si134O384].240H2O; cubic), β-zeolites (Nan[AlnSi64-nO128] with n<7; tetragonal), Mordenite zeolites (Na8[Al8Si40O96].24H2O; orthorhombic), ZSM zeolites (Nan[AlnSi96-nO192]˜16H2O with n<27; orthorhombic), and mixtures thereof.


It is appreciated that various grades of the sorptive material may be used. This is particularly true with gradients of zeolites which can be custom designed to selectively adsorb, for example, high boiling point materials, mid boiling point materials and low boiling point materials. This can lead to layers of the zeolite composition where the cerium or other suitable catalyst contemplated by this invention is preferably dispersed throughout these layers. The layers may then be bound on cigarette paper for the tobacco rod by using a binder or an adhesive which may be, for example, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol, carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC), starches and casein or soya proteins, and mixtures thereof.


The oxygen donor and oxygen storage metal oxide oxidation catalyst is most preferably selected from the transition metal oxides, rare earth metal oxides, (such as scandium, yttrium, and lanthanide metal series, i.e. lanthanum) and mixtures thereof. It is appreciated that the catalyst may be in its metal oxide form or a precursor of the metal oxide which, at the temperature of the burning cigarette, is converted to a metal oxide to perform its catalytic activities. The selected oxygen donor and oxygen storage metal oxide oxidation catalyst in its catalytic form releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of the burning cigarette. The transition metal oxides may be selected from oxides of the group of metals from the Periodic Table consisting of groups IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB, VIII and IB metals and mixtures thereof. Preferred metals from the transition metal group are oxides of iron, copper, silver, manganese, titanium, zirconium, vanadium and tungsten and from the rare earth group are oxides of lanthanide metals such as oxides of cerium. For example, cerium may be used in admixture with any one of the transition metals. It is appreciated that other metal oxide oxidation catalysts may be used with the oxygen storage and oxygen donor type of catalyst. Such other metal catalysts include precious metals and metals from groups IIA, IVA and mixtures thereof. Examples include tin, platinum, palladium and mixtures thereof.


The cerium catalyst precursor may be in the form of a cerium salt such as a cerium nitrate or other dispersible forms of cerium which are applied in solution or sol to the sorptive material and which are converted to cerium oxide at the high temperature of the burning cigarette to then function as a catalyst. For purposes of describing the invention, the term catalyst is intended to include any catalyst precursor.


The catalyst such as, cerium oxide, is used in combination with the adjunct material. It has been found that when the two are used separate from one another or in spaced apart, non-adjacent layers, the ability to control sidestream smoke is greatly reduced. Although in certain arrangements, some sidestream smoke control can be achieved. Preferably the catalyst is substantially adjacent the adjunct material. This can be achieved by co-mingling the particulate catalyst, in admixture with the adjunct, contacting a layer of the adjunct with a catalyst layer, coating the catalyst on the adjunct or impregnating the catalyst within or on the porous surfaces of the adjunct, to bring about the desired surprising sidestream smoke control properties. It should be appreciated that many other constituents may be used in addition to the combination of the oxygen storage and oxygen donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst and the adjunct. Additional additives may be used to further enhance the treatment of the sidestream smoke or alter other characteristics of the cigarette. Such additional additives may be mixed in with the treatment composition or used elsewhere in the cigarette construction, providing of course that such additives do not appreciably impact negatively on the ability of the treatment composition to treat the sidestream smoke.


The composition may be formulated in a variety of ways which achieve co-mingling of the cerium with the adsorptive material. For example, the adsorptive material may be sprayed with or dipped in a cerium salt solution such as cerium nitrate or cerium sol to impregnate the surface of the adsorptive material with cerium. Cerium oxide may be prepared as a separate fine powder which is mixed with the fine powder of the adsorptive material. It is particularly preferred that the catalyst powders have an average particle size of less than about 30 μm and preferably less than 20 μm and most preferably of about 1.0 to 5 μm to ensure intimate mixing and co-mingling of the materials.


As a general guide to selecting catalyst particle size and surface area, it is appreciated by one skilled in the art that the selected catalyst has a surface area which is such to ensure that the catalyst action sites are available to the migrating sidestream smoke components. This may result in catalyst particle size being greater than 30 m in certain embodiments, if the catalyst particles are properly distributed to achieve the necessary degree of sidestream smoke component oxidation.


It has been surprisingly found that the cerium oxide is one of the few metal oxides which can perform both functions of the invention, namely as the oxygen storage and oxygen donor catalyst and as well as the adjunct. The porous cerium oxide particles can be made with the high surface areas and an average particle size required for the adjunct. The cerium oxide is used with the cigarette paper in a first amount as the catalyst and a second amount as the adjunct in the treatment composition. Such amounts of the cerium oxide correspond generally with the amounts used for the catalyst and adjunct in accordance with other aspects of the invention to make up the total loading.


The cerium may be formulated as a solution dispersion, such as cerium oxide sol, or the like and applied to the sorptive material such as zeolite. It is then dried and fired to provide cerium oxide particles fixed on the surfaces of the adsorptive material. When the cerium oxide particles are fixed to adjunct surfaces such as surfaces of zeolite, the average particle size may be less than about 1.0 μm. The relative amounts of cerium oxide fixed to the zeolite may range from about 1% to 75% by weight based on the total equivalent cerium oxide and zeolite content. The preferred relative amounts of cerium oxide fixed to the zeolite may range from about 10% to 70% by weight based on the total equivalent cerium oxide and zeolite content.


A preferred method for making the combination product of cerium oxide fixed on the surfaces of the zeolite is described in a co-pending U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/318,878, filed in the U.S. Patent Office on Sep. 14, 2001, entitled “A Process For Making Metal Oxide-Coated Micropourous Material” the subject matter of which is incorporated hereby by reference.


Although a detailed specification for the manufacture of the combination product is provided in the above application, for ease of reference, the method generally involves making a catalytic cerium oxide-coated zeolite particulate material having at least 1% by weight of cerium oxide coated on outer surfaces of the zeolite particulate material, based on the total equivalent cerium oxide and zeolite content. In one aspect, the method generally comprises the steps of:


i) combining an amount of a colloidal dispersion of cerium oxide hydrate with a compatible zeolite particulate material to form a slurry, the amount of the colloidal dispersion being sufficient to provide, when heat treated as per step (ii), greater than 20% by weight of the cerium oxide, the zeolite particulate material having an average pore size of less than 20 Å and the colloidal dispersion having an average particle size of at least 20 Å, to position thereby, the colloidal dispersion on the outer surfaces of the zeolite; and


ii) heat treating the slurry firstly, at temperatures below about 200° C. and secondly, above about 400° C., to fix the resultant cerium oxide on the outer surfaces of the zeolite particulate material, to provide a free flowing bulk particulate.


This product is available from AMR Technologies, Inc. of Toronto, Canada. Alternatively to this method, the adjunct sorptive material may be dipped in a solution of cerium salt and dried and heat treated to form the cerium oxide on the surfaces of the sorptive material.


The surprising activity of the sidestream smoke treatment composition permits its use in cigarette papers having a wide range of porosities. It has also been found that the composition does not have to be used in cigarette papers that just have high porosities. The treatment composition works equally well in papers with very low porosities of about 0.5 through to very high porosity of about 1,000 Coresta units. Preferred porosities are usually less than 200 Coresta units and most preferred porosities are usually in the range of about 30 to 60 Coresta units. It is appreciated that the paper may be used as a double or multiple wrap. The paper may be applied as an outer wrap over a cigarette having conventional cigarette paper. It is appreciated that depending upon the porosity, certain combinations of the catalyst and adjunct may work better than others.


The composition may be simply sprayed onto either side or both sides of the cigarette paper and absorbed into the paper. As shown in FIG. 1, the paper 10 is conveyed in the direction of arrow 12. The treatment composition 14 as a slurry is sprayed by spray nozzle 16 onto the paper 10 to provide a coating 18 which is dried on the paper. Alternatively, the composition may be extruded as a film to the surface of the paper and may be used as a single or multiple wrap. As shown in FIG. 2, a film coating device 20 contains the slurried treatment composition 14. The film coater 20 lays a thin film 22 on the paper 10 which is conveyed in the direction of arrow 12. The film is dried to provide a coating 24 on the paper 10. With these arrangements, it is quite surprising that the visual sidestream smoke from a burning cigarette virtually disappears. The treatment composition may be applied to a conventional cigarette on the exterior of the cigarette paper. Coating may be achieved by a roller applicator 26, as shown in FIG. 3. The treatment composition 14 is applied as a layer 28 on the roller 30. A doctor knife 32 determines the thickness of a layer 34 which is then laid onto the paper 10 which is conveyed in the direction of arrow 12. The layer is then dried to form a coating 36 on the paper 10. Impregnation is achieved by using the coating roller 24 of FIG. 4 and the resultant layer 36 with paper 10 is passed in the direction of arrow 12 through pressure rollers 38 and 40 which force the layer of material into the paper 10 to thereby impregnate constituents of the treatment composition into the paper.


It is also understood by one of skill in the art that various other coating processes including transfer coating processes, may be used for making the treatment paper of the invention. In the transfer coating process, Mylar™ sheet or other suitable continuous sheet may be used to transfer a coating composition from the Mylar™ sheet to the surface of the cigarette paper. This type of transfer coating is useful when the substrate sheet may not readily accept the roll coating of a composition due to physical strength characteristics of the paper or the like.


A further alternative is to incorporate the treatment composition into the manufacture of paper. The composition may be introduced to the paper furnish as a slurry. With reference to FIG. 5, the treatment composition in the furnish 42 is stirred by stirrer 44 to form a slurry in the tank 46. The slurry is transferred in the conventional paper making manner and is laid as a layer 48 on a moving conveyor 50 to form the resultant cigarette paper 52. As a result the treatment composition is incorporated in the final paper product. Another alternative is to sandwich the treatment composition between paper layers to form a double cigarette paper wrap on tobacco rods. For example, the composition may be applied such as by the spraying technique of FIG. 1 on the interior of the outer paper or the exterior of the inner paper. Once the two papers are applied to the tobacco rod the composition as a layer is sandwiched between the two papers. Each paper may be of half of the thickness of conventional cigarette paper so that the double wrap does not add appreciably to the overall diameter of the cigarette as is readily handled by cigarette making machines.


With reference to FIG. 6, the tobacco rod 54 has, for example, the cigarette paper 10 wrapped there around with the coating 18 on the outside of the paper. Conversely, as shown in FIG. 7, the cigarette paper 10 can be applied with the coating 18 on the inner surface of the paper adjacent the tobacco rod 54.


Another alternative, as shown in FIG. 8, is to sandwich the coating 18 between cigarette papers 56 and 58. The papers 56 and 58 with the intermediate coating 18 may be formed as a single cigarette wrapper which is applied to the tobacco rod 54. A further alternative is shown in FIG. 9 where the tobacco rod 54 is covered with conventional cigarette paper 60. Over the conventional paper 60 is the cigarette paper 52 of FIG. 5 with the treatment composition incorporated therein. It is also appreciated that paper 52 with the treatment composition incorporated therein may be applied directly to the tobacco rod 54.


As is appreciated by one of skill in the art, the aforementioned procedures for providing the sidestream smoke treatment composition within or onto a desired cigarette paper may be varied with respect to the loadings provided and the number of wraps used on a tobacco rod. For example, two or more papers with various loadings of the composition, on both sides of the papers, may be used such that the loading to one side is reduced, making the coating application easier.


With any of these combinations, it has been surprisingly found that sidestream smoke is virtually eliminated. At the same time, the cigarette paper demonstrates conventional ashing characteristics. It is particularly surprising that the simple application of the composition to the exterior of the cigarette paper can minimize to an almost undetectable level, visible sidestream smoke.


It is appreciated that depending upon the manner in which the composition is used and applied to a cigarette, various processing aids and mixtures thereof may be required to facilitate the particular application of the treatment composition. Such processing aids include laminating materials such as polyvinyl alcohol, starches, CMC, casein and other types of acceptable glues, various types of binding clays, inert fillers, whiteners, viscosity modifying agents, inert fibrous material such as zirconium fibres and zirconium/cerium fibres, such as described in U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/318,614, filed Sep. 13, 2001, entitled “Zirconium/Metal Oxide Fibres” the subject matter of which is incorporated hereby by reference. Penetrating agents may also be employed to carry the composition into the paper. Suitable diluents such as water are also used to dilute the composition so that it may be spray coated, curtain coated, air knife coated, rod coated, blade coated, print coated, size press coated, roller coated, slot die coated, technique of transfer coating and the like onto a conventional cigarette paper.


Desirable loadings of the treatment composition onto or into the cigarette paper, wrapper or the like is preferably in the range of from about 2.5 g/m2 to about 125 g/m2. Most preferably the loading is in the range of about 2.5 g/m2 to about 100 g/m2. Expressed as a percent by weight, the paper may have from about 10% to 500% by weight and most preferably about 10% to 400% by weight of the treatment composition. While these loadings are representative for single paper, it is understood by one skilled in the art that these total loadings may be provided with the use of two or more papers.


The sidestream smoke reduction composition is used normally as a water slurry of the composition. The slurry may be incorporated in the furnish of the paper in the paper making process, or is coated onto the paper by various coating processes or impregnated into the paper by various impregnating methods. The preferred average particle size of the catalyst and adjunct for the slurry is in the range of about 1 μm to about 30 μm and most preferably about 1 μm to about 5 μm. The preferred relative amounts of catalyst fixed to the adjunct may range from about 1% to 75%, more preferably from about 10% to 70%, and even more preferably from about 20% to 70% by weight based on the total equivalent catalyst and adjunct content.


Although the mechanism responsible for this surprising reduction or elimination of sidestream smoke is not fully understood, it is thought that the use of an oxidation catalyst in cigarette paper increases the free-burn rate above the conventional free-burn rate. Without being bound to any certain theory, it is possible that the adjunct in combination with the catalyst affects not only the conventional free-burn rate but at the same time affects the heat transfer and mass transfer from the burning coal of the burning cigarette. It is possible that the adjunct, in combination with the catalyst, retards the rate at which the modified cigarette with catalyst would burn to now return the cigarette to a conventional free-burn rate. At this conventional free-burn rate, the catalyst is capable of achieving a significant conversion of sidestream smoke components to noticeably reduce visible sidestream smoke by greater than 50%, and normally greater than 80% and most preferably greater than 95%, as illustrated in the following examples.


EXAMPLES
Preamble

Cigarette Prototype 359-3 was furnished with double wrap of coated conventional cigarette paper. The loading of coating per treatment paper was 47 g/m2. The functional ingredients in the coating comprises an oxygen donor and oxygen storage metal oxide oxidation catalyst, specifically cerium oxide co-mingled with or fixed to a suitable adjunct, specifically a Y-type zeolite CBV 720 from Zeolyst International of Valley Forge, Pa., U.S.A.


These functional ingredients were rendered suitable for coating on conventional cigarette paper through formulation with a standard coating package that included, but is not limited to, a wetting agent, pH enhancer, binder system, surfactant, and defoamer. For this example, 1 part total functional ingredient was formulated with 0.002 parts wetting agent, 0.06 parts pH enhancer, 0.18 parts binder system, 0.01 parts surfactant, and 0.00024 parts defoamer. Such coating packages are well known to those skilled in the field of coating.


The prepared cigarettes were smoked in a standard smoking machine. The amount of sidestream smoke was quantified visually on a scale of 0 to 8, 0 being no sidestream smoke and 8 being sidestream smoke as generated by a conventional cigarette.


Example 1

The treatment paper significantly reduces visual side stream smoke, up to 95% or more reduction versus a conventional cigarette. A strong correlation exists between visual side stream smoke and a number of quantifiable measurements of components of side stream smoke, for example, tar and nicotine levels. Side stream smoke measurements made on Prototype 359-3 following Health Canada Method T-212 (for determination of tar and nicotine in sidestream tobacco smoke show, in Table 1A a 96% reduction in side stream nicotine and a 73% reduction in side stream tar. This % reduction of tar correlates with a 95% reduction of visual side stream smoke as shown in Table 1B. Hence not all of the tar constituents need to be removed from the sidestream smoke to provide an essentially invisible stream of sidestream smoke. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometer results of Table 1C are consistent with these measurements, showing an 82% reduction of aromatic hydrocarbons and an 88% reduction of nicotine in the side stream smoke. Sidestream smoke measurements on several prototypes are shown in Table 1D. The amount of sidestream smoke was quantified visually on a scale of 0 to 8, 0 being no sidestream smoke and 8 being sidestream smoke as generated by a conventional cigarette. Table 1D shows the amount of side stream smoke reduction in the prototypes as compared to the conventional cigarette and the correlation between the visual side stream smoke reduction and, subsequently, the consistent reduction in tar and nicotine. For example, a virtually imperceptible visual sidestream smoke reading of 0.5 corresponds to an amount of tar still remaining in the sidestream of about 6 mg per cigarette. Considerable experimentation in this area has revealed that there is an essentially linear relationship between sidestream smoke visual reading and the amount of tar remaining in the sidestream. For example, acceptable visual readings of about 2 correspond with a tar content in the sidestream of about 10 mg. Generally, a visual reading above 2 is not preferred, although it is understood that there may be circumstances where a visual rating greater than 2 may be justified, for example, where less sidestream smoke reduction is desired.


Example 2

The treatment paper does not materially alter the main stream smoke. Main Stream Smoke Measurements on Prototype 359-3. The measurements are made using the following procedures: ISO Procedure, ISO 3308, see Fourth Ed., Apr. 15, 2000 (for measurement of routine analytical cigarette), ISO Procedure, ISO 4387, see Second Ed., Oct. 15, 1991 (for determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine), ISO Procedure, ISO 10315, see First Ed., Aug. 1, 1991 (for determination of nicotine in smoke condensates—gas chromatographic method), ISO Procedure, ISO 10362-1, see Second Ed., Dec. 15, 1999 (for determination of water in smoke condensates—gas chromatographic method), ISO Procedure, ISO 3402, see Fourth Ed., Dec. 15, 1999 (atmosphere for conditioning and testing), ISO Procedure, ISO 8454, see Second Ed., Nov. 15, 1995 (for determination of carbon monoxide in the vapour phase of cigarette smoke—NDIR method, and it is shown in Table 2A that the nicotine and tar levels are substantially the same in the main stream compared to the levels in a conventional cigarette. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometer results shown in Table 2B are consistent with these measurements. The measurable amounts of aromatic hydrocarbons are 150 micrograms per conventional cigarette versus 119 micrograms per Prototype 359-3. The measurable amounts of aromatic nitrogen containing compounds, specifically nicotine, are 1436 micrograms per conventional cigarette versus 1352 micrograms per Prototype 359-3. The measurable amounts of furan and derivatives are 159 micrograms per conventional cigarette versus 156 micrograms per Prototype 359-3. The measurable amounts of hydrocarbons are 202 micrograms per conventional cigarette versus 177 micrograms per Prototype 359-3. The measurable amounts of other carbonyls, specifically triacetin, are 478 micrograms per conventional cigarette and 674 micrograms per Prototype 359-3.


Example 3

The treatment paper is combustible, burns in a conventional manner, and ashes. The burning characteristics were measured quantitatively following the ISO Procedure, ISO 4387, see Second Ed., Oct. 15, 1991 (for determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine). Prototype 359-3, as shown in Table 3A, has an average puff count of 8.7 puffs per prototype compared to an average 9.5 puffs per conventional cigarette. The calculated burn rates show in Table 3A that Prototype 359-3 has substantially the same burn rate of 0.09 mm/sec as the conventional cigarette. Burn temperature profile measurements were taken in accordance with a technique described in published PCT Application WO 99/53778, the subject matter of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst described in this published PCT application is typical of the oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst described in this application. As taught in this published PCT application, the selected oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures of a burning cigarette. Preferred oxygen storage and donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst are capable of releasing oxygen at elevated temperatures normally in the range of 400° C. to 550° C. The results of Table 3A are consistent with the above measurements, showing the Prototype burn characteristics both during the puff and the burn are substantially the same as the conventional cigarette. During puff, the control had a slightly lower temperature as measured at the paper surface, at the centre line of the cigarette and at a position ½ way along the radius of the cigarette. During burning, the paper temperature of the control and the Prototype 359-3 had essentially the same temperature.


Example 4

The coated treatment paper porosities were measured using procedures described in FILTRONA Operation Manual for Paper Permeability Meter PPM 100, and shown in Table 4A. The treatment paper used in furnishing Prototype 359-3 has a porosity of 9 Coresta. The coated treatment paper used in furnishing Cigarette Prototype 359-6 has a porosity of 32 Coresta. In Smoke Panel testing, Prototype 359-3 was found to have acceptable taste compared to a conventional cigarette with the same tobacco blend.


Prototype 359-6 was furnished in a similar double wrap manner to Prototype 359-3, as described in the Preamble. The loading of the coating per wrap was 34.5 g/m2. The functional ingredients in the coating were identical to the functional ingredients listed in the Preamble, but included additional adjunct materials, ZSM-5 type zeolite CBV 2802 from Zeolyst, and Beta Type Zeolite CP-811EL from Zeolyst.


These functional ingredients were rendered suitable for coating on conventional cigarette paper through formulation with a similar standard coating package as described in the preamble. For this coating package 1 part total functional ingredient was formulated with 0.002 parts wetting agent, 0.06 parts pH enhancer, 0.16 parts binder system, 0.01 parts surfactant, and 0.00024 parts defoamer.


Example 5

Different oxygen donor metal oxide oxidation catalysts are shown to be capable of reducing the side stream visual smoke to levels herein described. Referring to Table 5A, Prototype 2-143-1 shows ability of cerium oxide to function as both a high surface area adjunct and as an oxygen donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst. Prototype 2-143-2 shows the affects of high surface area cerium oxide co-mingled with Zeolite CBV 720 adjunct material to reduce visual side stream smoke. Prototype 2-133-3 shows the affects of the oxygen donor metal oxide oxidation catalyst iron oxide co-mingled with the high surface area CBV 720 adjunct material to reduce visual side stream smoke. At loadings of about one-half the loadings for the cerium based catalyst, iron oxide achieved a visual sidestream smoke reduction of about 2.5. It may be apparent that increasing the iron oxide loadings to the levels of the cerium oxide may achieve similar visible sidestream smoke reduction of about 1.0. It is readily apparent that by doubling the iron oxide and zeolite loadings to those levels of Prototypes 2-143-1 and 2-143-2, a similar visible sidestream smoke reduction of about 1.0 may be achieved.


Example 6

Particles ranging in an average diameter from 2 μm to more than 16 μm are capable of reducing the visual side stream smoke to the levels described in the previous examples. Although with a smaller particle size it is possible to apply lower coating loadings to meet the same visual side stream smoke levels as shown in Table 6A.


The functional ingredients in the coatings of Prototypes 2-50-1, 2-50-2, and 2-50-3 were identical to the functional ingredients listed in the preamble, only differing in the average particle size of the adjunct.













TABLE 1A







Control
359-3




[mg per
[mg per
%



cigarette]
cigarette]
Reduction




















Sidestream
Nicotine
5.35
0.24
95.5



Tar
22.7
6.1
73.1




















TABLE 1B








359-3





[mg per
%



Control
cigarette]
Reduction





















Sidestream
8
0.44
94.5



Visual (0 to 8)





















TABLE 1C







Control
359-3



Side Stream

[mg per
[mg per
%


Semi-Volatiles

cigarette]
cigarette]
Reduction



















Aromatic
Hydroquinone
175
31
82.3


hydrocarbons


Aromatic

5300
617
88.4


nitrogen


containing


nicotine




















TABLE 1D







Side Stream -
Tar
Nicotine



Visual (0-8)
(mg/cigarette)
(mg/cigarette)





















359-1
0.44

0.33



359-3
0.44
6.1
0.24



359-4
0.44
6.5
0.33



359-2
0.56
6.3
0.37



Control
8
22.7
5.35




















TABLE 2A







Control
359-3



[mg per
[mg per



cigarette]
cigarette]





















Main Stream
Nictone
1.59
1.49




Tar
14.9
16.7




















TABLE 2B







Control
359-3


Main Stream

[mg per
[mg per


Semi-Volatiles

cigarette]
cigarette]


















Aromatic
Hydroquinone
90
82


hydrocarbons
Phenol
60
37


Aromatic

1436
1352


nitrogen


containing


nicotine


Furan and
2-Furanmenthol
16
12


derivatives
5-(O-Me)-2-
113
111



Furancarboxyaldehyde



5-methyl-2-
11
11



Furancarboxyaldehyde



Furfural
19
22



Limonene
56
60



Neophytadiene
146
117


Carbonyls
Triacetin
478
674



















TABLE 3A







Control
Prototype 359-3


















Is paper combustible?
Yes
Yes


Ash formation
Good
Ashes, with peeling


No. of puffs
9.5
8.7


Free-burn rate1
0.09 mm/sec
0.09 mm/sec


Burn temp profile


During puff
620 ± 20
690 ± 20


Paper temperature ° C.


Centerline temperature ° C.
810 ± 20
890 ± 20


½ Radius temperature ° C.
790 ± 20
880 ± 20


During Free burn
520 ± 20
500 ± 20


Paper temperature ° C.






1Free burn rate~ (52 mm-butt length)/(60 sec*puff)



Assume butt length = 3.0 mm

















TABLE 4A







Base Paper
KC-514
KC-514









Prototype No.
359-3
359-6



Formula No.
2-13-2
2-99-1



*Paper Coating
DS
DS



Coating Load (g/m2)



Per Paper
47.4
34.5



Basis Wt. (Single Paper + Coating)
72.4
69.0



Basis Wt. Per Cigarette
72.4 × 2
69.0 × 2



Coated Paper Porosity (Coresta)
9
32



FUNCTIONAL INGREDIENTS



CBV 720 Zeolite with attached
100
75



cerium oxide



CBV 2802 Zeolite

12.5



CP-811 EL Zeolite

12.5



STANDARD COATING PACKAGE



(See Preamble)



BURNING CHARACTERISTICS



Temp
384
339



Puffs
9
9.3



Side Stream - Visual (0-8)
1
2.7







KC 514 Base Paper (Schweitzer-Mauduit International of Alpharetta, Georgia U.S.A.) has basis weight of 25 g/m2, and a starting porosity before coating of 50 Coresta units.



*DS—Double Paper, Single Coating (Sandwich Style)
















TABLE 5A





Base Paper
KC-514
KC-514
KC-514







Formula No.
2-143-1
2-143-2
2-133-3


Coating Load (g/m2)- Per Paper
54
49
53.5


Basis Wt. (Single Paper + Coating)
79
73
78.5


Basis Wt. Per Cigarette
158
146
78.5


FUNCTIONAL INGREDIENTS


Cerium oxide
100
44


CBV 720 Zeolite

56


CBV 720 Zeolite with 1% FeO


100


(2-132-4)


STANDARD COATING PACKAGE


(See Preamble)


BURNING CHARACTERISTICS


Temp
366
357
352


Puffs
7.0
8.3
8.3


Side Stream - Visual (0-8)
1.3
1.0
2.5


















TABLE 6A









Coated Handsheet Formula No.










FUNCTIONAL INGREDIENTS
2-50-1
2-50-2
2-50-4





CBV 720 Zeolite co-mingled
100
100
100


cerium oxide













Average Particle size of adjunct
2
μm
4
μm
16
μm


material


Amount of material need to
48
g/m2
95
g/m2
120
g/m2


reduce visual side stream to 3.









Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described herein in detail, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that variations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A cigarette comprising a tobacco rod and a cigarette paper for said tobacco rod, said paper which is combustible, burns and ashes, comprising, in combination, a rare earth metal oxide and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for said rare earth metal oxide wherein said rare earth metal oxide releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures for said cigarette.
  • 2. A cigarette of claim 1, wherein said rare earth metal oxide is cerium oxide and said adjunct is zeolite.
  • 3. A cigarette of claim 2, wherein said cerium oxide is fixed to the surface of said zeolite.
  • 4. A cigarette of claim 1, wherein said rare earth metal oxide is cerium oxide and said adjunct is zirconium oxide.
  • 5. A cigarette of claim 4, wherein said cerium oxide and zirconium oxide form a mixed metal oxide.
  • 6. The cigarette of claim 4, wherein the paper further comprises at least one metal and metal oxide oxidation catalyst, said metal and/or metal oxide oxidation catalyst being selected from the group consisting of precious metals, transition metal oxides, rare earth metal oxides, metals from groups HA and IVA, and mixtures thereof.
  • 7. A cigarette of claim 6, wherein said selected metal or metal oxide oxidation catalyst is selected from the group consisting of platinum, palladium, copper oxide, iron oxide, magnesium oxide, silver oxide, titanium oxide, zirconium oxide and mixtures thereof.
  • 8. A cigarette of claim 6, wherein said transition metal oxide is iron oxide.
  • 9. A low sidestream smoke cigarette comprising a tobacco rod, and a treatment paper, which is combustible, burns and ashes, said treatment paper having a sidestream smoke treatment composition, said treatment composition comprising, in combination, a rare earth metal oxide and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for said rare earth metal oxide wherein said rare earth metal oxide releases oxygen at free burn rate temperatures for said cigarette.
  • 10. A cigarette of claim 9, wherein said treatment composition comprises, in combination, a mixture of said rare earth metal oxide and a transition metal oxide and an essentially non-combustible finely divided porous particulate adjunct for said mixture.
  • 11. A cigarette of claim 10, wherein said rare earth metal oxide is cerium oxide, said transition metal oxide is zirconium oxide and the porous particulate adjunct is zeolite.
  • 12. A cigarette of claim 11, wherein said cerium oxide and zirconium oxide is a mixed metal oxide used in admixture with the zeolite.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/798,366, filed on Mar. 12, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,717,120, now allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/954,432, filed on Sep. 18, 2001, now allowed as U.S. Pat. No. 6,799,578, which claims benefit from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/233,440, filed on Sep. 18, 2000, by the same inventors and entitled “The Use Of An Oxygen Metal Oxide Catalyst To Reduce Cigarette Sidestream Smoke”. Each of the above-mentioned applications is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (166)
Number Name Date Kind
1581451 Knapp Apr 1926 A
2472493 Schneider et al. Jun 1949 A
2495700 Corson et al. Jan 1950 A
2496265 Bilisoly Feb 1950 A
2499733 Di Rubbio Mar 1950 A
2541837 Schroff Feb 1951 A
2666437 Lattof Jan 1954 A
2723243 Holden Nov 1955 A
2755207 Frankenburg Jul 1956 A
3013982 Breck et al. Dec 1961 A
3013987 Castor et al. Dec 1961 A
3140253 Plank et al. Jul 1964 A
3193493 Bourguet et al. Jul 1965 A
3220418 Cohn Nov 1965 A
3250280 Hu May 1966 A
3251365 Keith et al. May 1966 A
3266973 Crowley Aug 1966 A
3292636 Mays Dec 1966 A
3355317 Keith et al. Nov 1967 A
3395096 Gladrow et al. Jul 1968 A
3502087 Romano Mar 1970 A
3572348 Norman et al. Mar 1971 A
3703901 Norman et al. Nov 1972 A
3846827 Eppler Nov 1974 A
3860529 Hamling Jan 1975 A
3891595 Birchall Jun 1975 A
3916916 Bramucci Nov 1975 A
3991773 Walker Nov 1976 A
3992498 Morton et al. Nov 1976 A
4044778 Cohn Aug 1977 A
4076031 Grossman Feb 1978 A
4077414 Baker et al. Mar 1978 A
4108151 Martin et al. Aug 1978 A
4125591 Lindsley Nov 1978 A
4181532 Woodhead Jan 1980 A
4225636 Cline et al. Sep 1980 A
4225639 Matyasi et al. Sep 1980 A
4231377 Cline et al. Nov 1980 A
4231893 Woodhead Nov 1980 A
4248251 Bryant, Jr. et al. Feb 1981 A
4356106 Woodhead et al. Oct 1982 A
4433697 Cline et al. Feb 1984 A
4440868 Hettinger, Jr. et al. Apr 1984 A
4452259 Norman et al. Jun 1984 A
4457833 Zandona et al. Jul 1984 A
4483937 Liu Nov 1984 A
4499318 Liu Feb 1985 A
4561454 Guess Dec 1985 A
4585014 Fry Apr 1986 A
4615345 Durocher Oct 1986 A
4622983 Mathews et al. Nov 1986 A
4637990 Torobin Jan 1987 A
4637992 Lewis Jan 1987 A
4638819 Ikeda Jan 1987 A
4685477 Valdez Aug 1987 A
4739775 Hampl, Jr. Apr 1988 A
4788045 Colombet et al. Nov 1988 A
4793980 Torobin Dec 1988 A
4852590 Ferka Aug 1989 A
4871709 Tatsushima et al. Oct 1989 A
4878507 Case et al. Nov 1989 A
4889145 Adams et al. Dec 1989 A
4900712 Bar-Ilan et al. Feb 1990 A
4915117 Ito Apr 1990 A
4927622 Jade May 1990 A
4937212 Funkenbusch et al. Jun 1990 A
4938238 Barnes Jul 1990 A
4945932 Mentzel Aug 1990 A
4977126 Mauldin et al. Dec 1990 A
4998542 Kallianos et al. Mar 1991 A
5008090 Joy et al. Apr 1991 A
5040551 Schlatter et al. Aug 1991 A
5053214 Jada Oct 1991 A
5070053 Culross et al. Dec 1991 A
5072743 Perrine Dec 1991 A
5074990 Culross et al. Dec 1991 A
5075275 Murakami et al. Dec 1991 A
5077253 Chu et al. Dec 1991 A
5094222 Fukuda et al. Mar 1992 A
5105837 Barnes et al. Apr 1992 A
5105838 White et al. Apr 1992 A
5112781 Jada May 1992 A
5137034 Perfetti et al. Aug 1992 A
5152304 Bokelman et al. Oct 1992 A
5165899 Delaunay et al. Nov 1992 A
5170807 Kasbo et al. Dec 1992 A
5176899 Montgomery Jan 1993 A
5191906 Myracle, Jr. Mar 1993 A
5195165 Ono et al. Mar 1993 A
5200382 Cody et al. Apr 1993 A
5213779 Kay et al. May 1993 A
5232889 Blanchard et al. Aug 1993 A
5238625 Sakurai et al. Aug 1993 A
5263999 Baldwin et al. Nov 1993 A
5281445 Khare Jan 1994 A
5352646 Blanchard et al. Oct 1994 A
5386838 Quincy et al. Feb 1995 A
5387475 Baresel et al. Feb 1995 A
5417228 Baldwin et al. May 1995 A
5431887 Bar-Ilan Jul 1995 A
5462073 Bowen et al. Oct 1995 A
5468548 Giamei et al. Nov 1995 A
5474095 Allen et al. Dec 1995 A
RE35143 Funkenbusch et al. Jan 1996 E
5556819 Bar-Ilan Sep 1996 A
5592955 Keritsis Jan 1997 A
5709228 Cohen et al. Jan 1998 A
5731257 Qunicy Mar 1998 A
5733837 Nakatsuji et al. Mar 1998 A
5759663 Hounsel Jun 1998 A
5804526 Satoh et al. Sep 1998 A
5820998 Hotaling et al. Oct 1998 A
5878753 Peterson et al. Mar 1999 A
5878754 Peterson et al. Mar 1999 A
5911944 Kitaoka Jun 1999 A
5928981 Leyrer et al. Jul 1999 A
5935889 Murrell et al. Aug 1999 A
5944025 Cook et al. Aug 1999 A
5965481 Durand et al. Oct 1999 A
5976490 Wendelbo Nov 1999 A
5996589 St. Charles Dec 1999 A
6040265 Nunan Mar 2000 A
6090743 Chopin et al. Jul 2000 A
6228799 Aubert et al. May 2001 B1
6286516 Bowen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6371127 Snaidr et al. Apr 2002 B1
6419998 McGrath Jul 2002 B1
6536442 St. Charles et al. Mar 2003 B2
6722373 Bowen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6725867 Peterson et al. Apr 2004 B2
6748955 Snaidr et al. Jun 2004 B2
6779530 Kraker Aug 2004 B2
6799578 Snaidr et al. Oct 2004 B2
6810884 Snaidr et al. Nov 2004 B2
6817365 Hajaligol et al. Nov 2004 B2
6830053 Tanaka et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837248 Zawadzki et al. Jan 2005 B2
6854469 Hancock et al. Feb 2005 B1
6904918 Snaidr et al. Jun 2005 B2
7717120 Snaidr et al. May 2010 B2
20020002979 Bowen et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020005207 Wrenn et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020044901 Wilson et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020062834 Snaidr et al. May 2002 A1
20020139381 Peterson et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020179105 Zawadzki et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020179106 Zawadzki et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030037792 Snaidr et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030069132 Woodhead Apr 2003 A1
20030116169 Bowen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030150466 Kitao et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030164173 Zawadzki et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040007242 Finlay et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040011369 Matsufuji et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040020500 Wrenn et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040020504 Snaidr et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040123874 Zawadzki et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040134631 Crooks et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040173231 Bowen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040182407 Peterson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040231685 Patel et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040261805 Wanna et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050000530 Snaidr et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050022829 Atwell et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050121045 Finlay et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050170948 Woodhead et al. Aug 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (57)
Number Date Country
604895 Sep 1960 CA
1180968 Jan 1985 CA
1211021 Sep 1986 CA
2010575 Aug 1990 CA
2033291 Jun 1991 CA
2054735 Oct 1991 CA
2057962 Jul 1992 CA
2274013 Jun 1998 CA
3508127 Sep 1986 DE
0069934 Jan 1983 EP
0251254 Jan 1988 EP
0386884 Sep 1990 EP
0469513 May 1992 EP
0483998 May 1992 EP
0559300 Sep 1993 EP
0740907 Nov 1996 EP
0758532 Feb 1997 EP
0758695 Feb 1997 EP
0864259 Sep 1998 EP
1234514 Aug 2002 EP
1234514 Jan 2003 EP
1329165 Jul 2003 EP
1583284 Oct 1969 FR
928089 Jun 1963 GB
1181794 Feb 1970 GB
1322723 Jul 1973 GB
1402544 Aug 1975 GB
2059933 Apr 1981 GB
2236493 Oct 1991 GB
03-060738 Mar 1991 JP
06-052497 Jul 1994 JP
10-066882 Mar 1998 JP
11-036193 Feb 1999 JP
11-151082 Jun 1999 JP
2003-129399 May 2003 JP
2003-189840 Jul 2003 JP
2003-299474 Oct 2003 JP
106818 Jan 2008 SG
9212647 Aug 1992 WO
9422564 Oct 1994 WO
9534226 Dec 1995 WO
9622031 Jul 1996 WO
9727831 Aug 1997 WO
9816125 Apr 1998 WO
9953778 Oct 1999 WO
0141590 Jun 2001 WO
0170054 Sep 2001 WO
0224005 Mar 2002 WO
0224006 Mar 2002 WO
0237991 May 2002 WO
02067704 Sep 2002 WO
02078471 Oct 2002 WO
02091865 Nov 2002 WO
03020058 Mar 2003 WO
03077668 Sep 2003 WO
03086115 Oct 2003 WO
2004041008 May 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100192964 A1 Aug 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60233440 Sep 2000 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10798366 Mar 2004 US
Child 12759528 US
Parent 09954432 Sep 2001 US
Child 10798366 US