Patent Grant
7360512
The present invention relates generally to a cylinder head intake port design in a port-injected, spark ignition engine, and more particularly to a concept for an intake port of low thermal inertia decoupling the surface temperature of the intake port from that of the coolant, and a manufacturing process to form the low-thermal-inertia intake port.
It is well established that certain critical portions of the fuel-air mixing process can be influenced by the thermal environment wherein fuel and air first come into contact with each other, i.e., the intake port. While the air that passes through the intake port is only slightly influenced by the temperature of the intake port walls, any liquid fuel that exists as a film on the intake port wall will be significantly affected by the temperature. Thus, the liquid-vapor equilibrium and the mixing process will be affected by this.
The temperature of the intake port walls can influence the heat flux from the walls to any liquid fuel films. Conventional design practice places the intake port in direct contact with engine coolant, and therefore the temperature is governed principally by that of the coolant with a slow warm up period and a near constant temperature thereafter throughout the engine operating regime.
Further, conventionally designed intake ports are manufactured with a port-core casting technique which utilizes relatively large wall thicknesses surrounded by engine coolant, resulting in a high degree of thermal inertia. Also undesirable are locational and dimensional variability and relatively “rough” surface finish associated with the port-core casting technique.
Disadvantageously, the slow warm up and constant temperature of conventional intake ports is not ideal with respect to emissions, fuel efficiency, and performance. Thus, there exists a need to thermally decouple the temperature of the intake port walls from the engine cooling system to align the temperature closer to idealized thermal conditions for intake ports. Further, there exists a need for a manufacturing process for the thermally-decoupled intake port which adds an air gap between the intake port walls and the cylinder head surface while providing a more uniform and polished surface from the port-casting technique used in conventional intake ports.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,099,808 to Matsuura et al. discloses a cylinder head assembly with intake ports having a thermally insulated barrier made of a ceramic material covering the intake port wall for purposes of reducing air flow resistance by reducing heat transfer between the cylinder head and the inducted air. However, the Matsuura et al. reference fails to disclose thermally decoupling the surface temperature of the intake port wall from the coolant in order to match ideal thermal characteristics of an intake port. Further, the Matsuura et al. reference fails to disclose a hydroform manufacturing process to form a low-thermal-inertia intake port.
The present invention provides an intake port design with a low thermal inertia characteristic, thereby decoupling the surface temperature of the intake port from that of the coolant through use of an air gap between a portion of the intake port wall and cylinder head. Because of this thermal decoupling, at idle and part-throttle, the intake port is at a higher surface temperature yielding better cold-start emissions, better mixture preparation, and less dense intake charge (“thermal throttling”) for better fuel economy. At wide-open-throttle, the intake port is at a lower surface temperature yielding better volumetric efficiency for improved torque and reduction in knocking tendency enabling higher compression ratio for improved fuel economy and performance.
The intake port design of the present invention can be manufactured with a hydroform manufacturing process resulting in improved dimensional consistency and smooth surface finish. Additionally, the process eliminates some cylinder head machining processes. Further, this process manufactures the intake ports without significant cost differences from conventional port manufacturing processes.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a low-thermal-inertia intake port for a port-injected, spark ignition engine includes intake port walls disposed within a cylinder head such that an air gap is formed between the intake port walls and the cylinder head, and the air gap extends from above a valve seat at a downstream end of the intake port to below an upstream end of the intake port. The air gap is operable to thermally decouple the temperature of the intake port walls from the temperature of the engine providing thermal characteristics mimicking ideal thermal characteristics for intake port walls. The ideal thermal characteristics of the walls of the intake port relative to an engine coolant include higher surface temperature at idle and part-throttle, and lower surface temperature at wide-open throttle. The walls of the intake port include pre-formed sheet metal. The low-thermal-inertia intake port further includes a valve guide located in a hole punched within the pre-formed sheet metal, and the valve guide includes an aperture adapted for receipt of a stem portion of an intake valve therethrough. The low-thermal-inertia intake port also includes a valve seat at a downstream opening of the intake port operable to control the selective flow of air and fuel through the intake port cooperative with an intake valve. Optionally, the valve guide and valve seat are furnace brazed to the pre-formed sheet metal. Advantageously, the compression ratio is raised by between one-half and about one full ratio in a port-injected, spark ignition engine equipped with a plurality of low thermal inertia intake ports.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method of operating a port-injected, spark ignition engine with a plurality of low-thermal-inertia intake ports includes the steps of heating the walls of the plurality of low-thermal-inertia intake port during cold start and warm-up relative to the engine coolant, conveying heat to liquid fuel films residing in the intake ports during light load, and minimizing heat flux from the port walls to the liquid fuel films at high load and low-to-mid speed operating conditions. Each of the plurality of low-thermal-inertia intake ports include intake port walls disposed within a cylinder head such that an air gap is formed between the intake port walls and the cylinder head, and the air gap extends from above a valve seat at a downstream end of the intake port to below an upstream end of the intake port. The air gap is operable to thermally decouple the temperature of the intake port walls from the temperature of the engine providing thermal characteristics mimicking ideal thermal characteristics for intake port walls. Advantageously, the compression ratio of the port-injected, spark ignition engine is raised to an extent that the knock tendency is the same as an engine equipped with conventional intake ports without low thermal inertia.
In yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a manufacturing method for a low-thermal-inertia intake port for a port-injected, spark ignition engine includes the steps of hydroforming steel tubing to form intake port walls for the low thermal inertia intake port, punching a valve guide hole in the hydroformed steel tubing, furnace brazing an intake valve guide and valve seat to the hydroformed steel tubing, adding core sand to the furnace brazed and hydroformed steel tubing, performing aluminum casting, and removing the core sand through a deliberate opening. Further, the manufacturing method includes the step of machining the inner surface of the valve seat and the stem portion of the valve guide.
The present invention is illustrated and described herein with reference to the various drawings, in which like reference numbers denote like system components and/or method steps, respectively, and in which:
a-3c are sectional and perspective views of a low-thermal-inertia intake port according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
a-4f are a flowchart and perspective views illustrating a manufacturing process for low thermal inertia intake ports according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
In various exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides an intake port design and associated manufacturing method with a low thermal inertia characteristic, thereby decoupling the surface temperature of the intake port from that of the coolant through use of an air gap formed between a portion of the intake port wall and cylinder head. Because of this thermal decoupling, at idle and part-throttle, the intake port is at a higher surface temperature yielding better cold-start emissions, better mixture preparation, and less dense intake charge (“thermal throttling”) for better fuel economy. At wide-open-throttle (WOT), the intake port is at a lower surface temperature yielding better volumetric efficiency for improved torque and reduction in knocking tendency enabling higher compression ratio for improved fuel economy.
Idealized thermal conditions for intake port walls may be characterized as follows for cold start and warm-up, light load operation, and high load and low-to-mid speed operation. During cold start and warm-up, it is desirable for the intake port walls to heat up as rapidly as possible relative to the engine coolant to promote fuel vapor formation during this thermal transient period where exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons are a dominant concern. This will reduce the enrichment required to promote sufficiently homogeneous mixture formation to support robust combustion.
During light load operation where knock is not an issue, it is desirable to convey as much heat as possible to liquid fuel films residing in the intake ports to help ensure maximum charge homogeneity to support emissions-related goals, and to lower the charge density as much as possible through heating and thus to reduce the need for pressure throttling which is responsible for the so-calling pumping loss (this may be termed thermal ‘throttling’). This will reduce fuel consumption at those operating conditions where pumping losses are high, i.e., at typical low-speed cruise conditions.
At high load and low-to-mid speed operating conditions where knock is a critical issue, it is desirable to minimize heat flux from the port walls to the liquid fuel films to reduce charge temperatures and thus to reduce the knock tendency. This then can enable the use of higher-than-normal compression ratios which supports improved fuel efficiency and performance. At the same time, the knock tendency is reduced by reduced charge temperatures, and volumetric efficiency is increased thereby increasing engine performance over the entire speed range.
These aforementioned attributes can be realized by thermally decoupling a portion of the intake port from the engine cooling system. A low-thermal-inertia intake port of the present invention provides a surface temperature of the interior walls that is high at low load and low at high load relative to the engine coolant. In various exemplary embodiments, the low-thermal-inertia intake port includes an air gap formed between the intake port walls and the surfaces of the cylinder head, and the air gap is operable to decouple the surface temperature of the intake port from the coolant or cylinder bore.
Referring to
A low-thermal-inertia intake port 40 of the present invention selectively supplies a flow of air and fuel into the combustion chamber 10. A valve seat 52 cooperative with an intake valve 30 controls the selective flow of air and fuel through a downstream opening 48 of the intake port 40. A stem portion 38 of the intake valve 30 extends through an aperture 44 through a valve guide 46 in the intake port 40.
A fuel injector 60 is configured to spray fuel into the interior of the intake port 40. Air and fuel are introduced into the combustion chamber 10 during an intake stroke after the intake valve 30 moves into an opened position. As described herein, the temperature of the intake port 40 significantly affects the temperature of any liquid fuel that exists as a film on walls 50 of the intake port 40 while the air that passes through the intake port 40 is only slightly influenced by the temperature of the intake port walls 50. Thus, the liquid-vapor equilibrium and the mixing process will be affected by the temperature of the intake port walls 50.
As described herein, not all exhaust gas flows through the exhaust port 16 during the combustion cycle. Some hot residual gas flows from the combustion chamber into the intake port 40 as intake valve lift begins. The low-thermal-inertia intake port 40 utilizes this naturally occurring event to align its temperature characteristics to aforementioned idealized thermal characteristics.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the low-thermal-inertia intake port 40 is configured to thermally decouple the surface temperature of the intake port 40 from that of the engine coolant by introducing an air gap 54 to act as a thermal barrier between the intake port walls 50 and the cylinder head 18. This air gap 54 decouples the temperature to achieve aforementioned attributes of idealized thermal conditions for intake port walls 50. Advantageously, the air gap 54 provides much less thermal inertia than other conventional methods such as ceramic lining within the intake port 40.
In one exemplary embodiment, the air gap 54 is formed from above the valve seat 52 at the downstream end 48 to just below the upstream end 42. Based on experimentation, the air gap 54 width can be above 1 mm to properly decouple the thermal characteristics of the intake port walls 50 from the cylinder head 18. A sheet metal tube or the like is included in the intake port sand core such that the air gap 54 results between the intake port walls 50 and the parent metal of the cylinder head 18. The intake port walls 50 can be pre-formed sheet metal or a formed, sheet metal hollow intake valve. A core sand exit 56 is also formed in the cylinder head 18 extending from the air gap 54 to allow for the exit of core sand following a casting process.
Referring to
Engine operating condition influences the mixture preparation process largely by the attendant residual gas content of the charge, i.e., the hot residual gas content of the charge increases as load and speed decrease. Other factors such as valve overlap, equivalence ratio, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) levels, and ignition timing also affect this. Hot residual gas flows from the combustion chamber into the intake port as intake valve lift begins. This is a pressure-driven back-flow, and at very light loads it will be a high velocity flow with significant turbulent mixing potential. During the cold startup process, mixture preparation is hindered by the combination of cold fuel and cold air coming together in a cold intake port.
At low speed and low engine load, i.e., low BMEP of around 0 to 40 psi in
As the load increases, i.e., BMEP above 40 psi, the low-thermal-inertia intake port surface temperature is expected to decrease as illustrated in the rightward portion 72″ of line 72. Here, the effect of the above described exhaust gas backflow are substantially decreased while a greater air flow through the intake port tends to decrease the mean surface temperature of the port walls. Accordingly, the temperature of the fluid flow into the combustion chamber decreases. This lowering of the temperature permits an engine to be designed with an increased compression ratio without risking a knocking problem. Specifically, line portion 72′ shows the cooler surface port temperature of a low-thermal-inertia intake port of the present invention versus a convention port which is shown in the rightward portion 74″ of the convention port line 74.
Advantageously, the compression ratio can be raised to an extent that the knock tendency is the same as the baseline configuration (i.e., conventional port without low thermal inertia). If the charge (i.e., fuel/air mixture and residual gas) temperature is reduced by approximately 40° F. at full load of 120 psi BMEP as shown in
Referring to
As described herein, the low-thermal-inertia intake port 40 includes a valve seat 52 located at the downstream end 48. The valve seat 52 forms the opening to the intake port 40 along which is opened and closed by the intake valve. Air flows into the intake port 40 at the upstream end 42, and the valve guide 46 extends outward from the intake port 40 and includes the aperture 44 which the stem portion of the intake valve fits into.
The intake port walls 50 can be a pre-formed sheet metal that is included in the intake port sand core such that at least a 1 mm air gap 54 results between the intake port walls 50 and the parent metal of the cylinder head 18. The intake port walls 50 are anchored into the cylinder head 18 material, i.e., aluminum or the like, just above the intake valve seat 52. The core sand exit 56 is included in the casting process to allow core sand to exit from the intake port walls 50 after casting. Alternatively, the intake port walls 50 could be relatively open at the upstream end 42 to allow for core sand removal after casting through the core sand exit 56, i.e., the intake port walls 56 are not attached to the cylinder head 18 at the upstream end 42 where the intake manifold attaches. The intake manifold gasket port openings (not shown) would surround the upstream end 42 of the port walls 50 giving it stability and alignment with the intake manifold runner windows (not shown). Further, this effect may be enhanced by using a formed sheet metal hollow intake valve.
Referring to
Manufacturing method 80 begins by obtaining steel tubing, as depicted in step 81.
A valve guide hole is punched into the hydroformed steel tubing, as depicted in step 83.
An un-machined intake valve guide and valve seat are furnace brazed to the formed sheet metal port, as depicted in step 84.
Core sand is added to the furnace-brazed, formed sheet metal port, as depicted in step 85.
The aluminum cylinder head is cast, as depicted in step 86. Note this is an un-machined step. While this structure involves an added steel part (i.e., intake port walls), it eliminates several machining operations inherent in conventional port designs as the valve seat 52 and valve guide 46 are cast into the parent metal (i.e., aluminum or the like) of the cylinder head. Additionally, the method 80 provides cost-effective and efficient means to form a thermally-insulating barrier as opposed to conventional means such as lining the intake port.
The core sand exits the casting through a deliberate opening following the aluminum casting process, as depicted in step 87. An opening 96 to the atmosphere is provided for the exit of core sand used to form the thermally decoupled portion of the port. Finally, remaining machining operations are performed such as machining the inner surface of the valve seat and the stem portion of the valve guide, as depicted in step 88.
Effectively, the method 80 forms a low-thermal-inertia intake port of the present invention by integrating a formed steel part (i.e., the intake port walls) with some attachments (i.e., valve seat and valve guide) into the cylinder head structure. As described herein, this method 80 is cost-effective by forming the air gap without requiring a liner, and the method 80 provides a smoother and consistent finish of the intake port.
Although the present invention has been illustrated and described herein with reference to preferred embodiments and specific examples thereof, it will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments and examples may perform similar functions and/or achieve like results. All such equivalent embodiments and examples are within the spirit and scope of the present invention and are intended to be covered by the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3989424 | Goloff et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4182282 | Pollet | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4300494 | Graiff et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4785773 | Schreiber et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 5099808 | Matsuura et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5551385 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5842342 | Strasser et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5875754 | Ickinger | Mar 1999 | A |
| 6729272 | Iizuka et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 7069884 | Baba et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7191740 | Baba et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
