One type of valve includes a rotor with channels that direct high pressure fluid from a high pressure source to one of a plurality of receivers. Forces on the rotor that must be overcome to turn it, vary with fluid pressure to assure good sealing against the rotor as the fluid pressure varies. The valve commonly includes a pair of bodies lying on opposite sides of the rotor, each body holding a moveable member that has a through bore and that presses against a surface of the rotor. A seal device dynamically seals to the moveable member and statically seals to the walls of the body passage. The position of the seal device must be stabilized against movement by the high pressure. If the diameter of the seal surface that dynamically seals to the moveable member could be minimized while keeping a robust moveable member, then the force of the moveable member against a corresponding rotor surface could be minimized. This would minimize torque while still varying the force of each moveable member against the rotor as the pressure of the high pressure fluid varies.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a high pressure valve is provided of a type that includes a rotor held between a pair of movable members that move within bodies and press against rotor opposite surfaces. Each movable member presses with a force that is largely proportional to the pressure of the high pressure fluid, but the total forces on the rotor are reduced from the too-high levels existing in previous valves of this type. The force is reduced by providing a seal device that is constrained from forward movement by a flange fixed to the body, and with the seal device dynamically sealing to a cylindrical surface on the outside of the moveable member.
The flange that is fixed to the body is part of an insert that is screwed into a front end of the body. The flange has a front surface that abuts the rear end of a spring whose front spring end abuts a shoulder on the moveable member, to assure that the movable member remains pressed against the rotor even when there is no pressure.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention will be best understood from the following description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The upper body 94 holds a movable member 80 of the same construction as the lower moveable member. The upper movable member has a bore 82 with a lower end 84 that opens to the rotor, and a movable member lower end 86 that presses against the rotor. A spring 88 presses the upper movable member down against the rotor and a seal device 90 with an O-ring seal ring 92 seals the upper movable member to walls of a passage 96 in the upper body 94. When the pressure P1 of source fluid at the input port 60 is zero, then the forces on the rotor are the forces of the compression springs 58 and 88 (plus the downward force of another spring on another movable member in the upper body). The springs apply moderate forces such as 5 pounds each, so there is then a low net force and low friction on the rotor and the rotor can be turned using only a small torque. When the pressure P1 is high, such as at 10,000 psi, then there are high forces on the rotor. The forces on the rotor includes the force of the high pressure (P1) fluid over the area of a circle of diameter D1 where the O-ring seal 62 dynamically seals to walls of the passage 54 in the lower body, minus the force over the area D2 where the upper end 72 of the bore in the movable member opens to the rotor.
When the pressure P1 at the source member passage 70 is high, such as at 10,000 psi, then the pressure P2 at the upper movable member bore 82 is lower. If there is a high flow rate of fluid though the narrow rotor channel 98, then the pressure P2 may be much lower than P1. The downward force on the rotor (other than that applied by the spring of the other receiver member) is equal to the pressure P2 over the area of the outside diameter D4 of the upper O-ring seal or ring seal 90 minus the pressure over the area of the bore lower end diameter D3.
In one example, it is assumed that there is a high rate of fluid flow though the rotor channel 98, so P2 equals 5,000 psi at a time when P1 equals 10,000 psi. It is also assumed that diameter D1 equals 0.66 inch, diameter D2 equals 0.5 inch, diameter D3 equals 0.5 inch and diameter D4 equals 0.66 inch. The upward force on the rotor (not including the small forces of the compression springs) equals the area at D1 (0.34 inch2) times P1, minus the area at D2 (0.20 inch2) times P1, and the downward force equals the area D3 (0.20 inch2) times P2, minus the area at D4 (0.34 inch2) times P2. The net upward force on the rotor is given by (assuming P1=10.000 psi):
[(0.34 inch2×P1)−(0.20 inch2×P1]=1400 pounds
The net downward force on the rotor is given by (assuming P2=5,000 psi):
[(0.34 inch2×P2)−(0.20 inch2×P2)]=700 pounds
The total force on the rotor is:
1400 pounds+700 pounds=2100 pounds
It requires a large torque to turn the rotor even with low friction between the rotor faces and the faces of the moveable members. The forces are minimized by constructing each movable member 52 and 80 with a small outside diameter, as by using a small thickness sleeve portion 100 of the movable member. It would be desirable if the torque could be lowered somewhat using the same dimensions of the rotor and of the seal member passage ends. It should be noted that in designing a valve , an engineer assures that the ratio of bore end diameter D2 to seal diameter D1 is at least about 0.8 (0.72 to 0.88) to avoid tilting the movable member. Another way to describe this is to mention that the ratio of areas at D2 to D1 should be about 0.65. The ratio of about 0.8 can be maintained while minimizing forces on the rotor, by minimizing the sealing diameter D1 where the seal 62 seal to the movable member. However, the bore diameter C must be a certain minimum such as 0.3 inch in the above example, to minimize restriction of fluid flow.
The valve shown in
The movable member 112 is urged forward F towards the rotor 160 by a compression spring 120. As shown in
In order to facilitate construction of the valve, the abutment 204 and cylindrical sealing surface 212 are formed on an insert 126 that is part of the lower valve portion 200. The insert 126 has external threads 127 and has been installed by forming an enlarged hole portion or passageway 128 in the body part 116P with internal threads 129, and screwing the insert into the threaded hole. It is possible to instead use a snap ring as a holder to hold an insert, although applicant prefers a thread which prevents insert shifting. The compression spring 120 lies forward of an inward flange 132 of the insert and abuts a forwardly facing shoulder 133 of the flange. The seal ring device 121 lies rearward of the flange. In this arrangement, dynamic sealing of the moveable member 112 to the valve body occurs at the inside surface 137 of the elastomeric seal 122 against a cylindrical outer seal surface 135 of the moveable member, with the dynamic seal surface being of diameter D5 which is the outside diameter of a cylindrical part 134 of the movable member 112. Dynamic sealing occurs at the inside surface 137 of the seal ring because the moveable member can move forward and rearward slightly with respect to the seal ring inner surface. The seal ring 122 is statically sealed to the body because the seal ring cannot move relative to the rigid backup ring 124 that cannot move because it abuts the stationary flange shoulder 204. The diameter D6 of the upper end 140 of the movable member bore 142 is the same (0.5 inch) as that in
Due to the fact that the elastomeric seal 122 dynamically seais to the outside of the moveable member, the dynamic seal diameter D5 is less than the diameter D1 of
The net upward force on the rotor 160 of
[(area within D5×P1)−(area within D5×P1)=[(0.31 inch2×P1)−(0.20 inch2×P1)]=1000 pounds
The net downward force on the rotor by moveable member 150 is given by (assuming P2=5000 psi):
[(0.31 inch2×P2)−(0.20 inch2×P2)]=500 pounds
The total force on the rotor is 1500 pounds, which is a 28% reduction compared with the 2100 pounds of force of the valve of
The moveable member 112 has front and rear ends 217, 219 and has a front face 220 that is pressed against a corresponding surface 222 of the rotor which also has an opposite surface 223. The member front face projects forward of the front of the body 116. The spring 120 that urges the movable member forward presses against a rear shoulder 224 formed on the movable member and against the front shoulder 133 on the insert flange. The spring is isolated from the continual flow of pressured fluid. The moveable member rear shoulder 224 is formed on an outer flange 226 of the movable member.
Thus, the invention provides a valve of the type wherein sealing forces of moveable members against surfaces of a rotor with channels, vaiy with the pressure of fluid being controlled by the valve, and wherein the total forces of the movable members against the rotor are minimized. By minimizing forces against the rotor, applicant minimizes friction of the movable members against the rotor, making it easier to turn the rotor. This is accomplished by using an arrangement where the seal ring device abuts a stationary body abutment such as an abutment formed on an insert that is fixed to a body, and the seal ring is dynamically sealed to the movable member at the inside diameter of the seal ring and is statically sealed to the body at the outside of the seal ring. This reduces the diameter of the surface of the movable member that is dynamically sealed against and therefore reduces the area over which the fluid pressure (P1 or P2) presses the movable member forward towards the rotor.
Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated herein, it is recognized that modifications and variations may readily occur to those skilled in the art, and consequently, it is intended that the claims be interpreted to cover such modifications and equivalents.
Applicant claims priority from U.S. provisional patent application 60/703,992 filed Jul. 29, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60703992 | Jul 2005 | US |