Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to feed control for a brush chipper. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for providing a lower feed stop bar that reduces nuisance trips.
2. Background Art
Control aspects of brush chippers are provided for control and safety of machinery and operators. One control aspect, a lower feed stop bar, is located at an infeed side of an infeed table or shelf on the brush chipper. It is situated such that an operator may stop the feed of brush for any reason by pushing the lower feed stop bar toward the brush chipper. Present day feed stop bars are typically pivoted from pivot arms at each end of a control bar. The control bar extends across the infeed end of the infeed table. In the known art, the pivot arms extend upward from the control bar and the axis of rotation is above and toward the outfeed end of the brush chipper more than the control bar.
The force of gravity, aggravated by machine vibrations, tends to force the lower feed stop bar toward its forward position, thereby causing nuisance trips.
The infeed table of a brush chipper is subjected to significant vertical accelerations that occur when loading branches/logs onto the feed table. When a log is dropped onto the table it moves downward, stops and then moves upward. As the downward movement starts the feed table and the feed stop bar are subjected to a negative acceleration, wherein the feed stop bar will tend to rotate clockwise if the pivot axis is to the left of the mass of the feed stop bar as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 2004/0108397, for example, and would tend to rotate counter-clockwise if the pivot axis was to the right of the mass of the feed stop bar. As the feed table is moving downward, the tires and suspension of the machine are being compressed, and eventually the movement changes direction, and energy stored in the tires and suspension cause the machine to move upwards. During this upward movement, when the direction is reversed, the feed stop bar is subject to acceleration in an opposite direction. Having the design of the feed stop bar, including the position of the pivot axis to the left of the mass of the stop bar, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 of No. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 2004/0108397, has been observed to result in false trips due to the dynamic loading, the acceleration of the feed table previously described.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,692,548 by Bouwers et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,692,549 by Eggers are hereby incorporated by reference and disclose brush chippers having many components of the brush chippers on which the present invention is used. Some of the pertinent components are: a material inlet, or feed table assembly, a plurality of feed rollers, and a chipping drum. The feed rollers are driven by hydraulic motors.
There is, therefore, a need for a method and apparatus for a lower feed stop bar pivoted and oriented in a fashion to reduce the possibility of nuisance trips while providing all the functionality of lower feed stop bars in the prior art.
It is an object of the present invention is to provide a lower feed stop bar for a brush chipper having fewer nuisance trips than lower stop bars of the prior art. To effect this object, the lower feed stop bar is provided with an axis of rotation or pivot located below the control bar and towards the brush chipper relative to the control bar. Configured in this fashion, the center of mass of the lower feed stop bar resides away from the brush chipper relative to the axis of rotation. Hence, gravity tends to rotate the lower feed stop bar in a direction opposite that under which the brush feed will be caused to cease.
In the preferred embodiment, a spring or other elastic member provides further force to rotate the lower feed stop bar in a direction opposite that under which the brush feed will be caused to cease.
An additional object of this invention is to provide a mechanical safety system that positions the lower feed stop bar in its tripped position when the infeed table is folded up into its folded position against the brush chipper. The infeed table is often placed in its folded position for transport of the brush chipper from one area to another. By assuring the feed has ceased, the brush chipper is in a safer and more efficient mode for transport.
The stated and other objects will be made clear by reference to the drawings and detailed description of the invention.
The present invention has resulted in an unexpected result of having fewer false trips. This is believed to be due to the fact that positive acceleration of the feed table, as it stops moving downward, and starts moving upward, is greater than the negative acceleration as it initially moves downward.
One significant aspect of the preferred embodiment of the present invention is the fact that the machine is mounted on a trailer with a suspension and with rubber tires. It is theorized that this is the reason that the maximum acceleration occurs when the feed table changes direction from downward to upward following a log being dropped on the infeed table and this is at least partially why this invention is effective.
With reference now to the various figures in which identical elements are numbered identically throughout, a description of various exemplary aspects of the present invention will now be provided. The preferred embodiments are shown in the drawings and described with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the embodiments disclosed.
A brush chipper 10, illustrated with the lower feed stop bar 100 of the present invention, is shown in
Once the brush has been chipped into wood chips, the resulting wood chips are expelled through a rotatable chute 130.
The brush chipper is often mounted on wheels 140 (only one shown in
Generally, the brush chipper 10 has an infeed end 150 and an outfeed end 160. A feed direction is defined, for the purposes of this document, including the claims, as the direction the brush is forced while it is being chipped; that is, the feed direction is the direction going from the infeed end to the outfeed end of the brush chipper.
As is clearly seen in
The feed table 110 stows against the brush chipper 10 for transport as seen in
Detail views of the lower feed stop bar 100 are shown in
The control bar 320 engages a movable stop 420, which, in turn, engages a spring 430. Thus, the movable stop 420 can be forced into the spring and moved, yet still provides a force to maintain the lower feed stop bar in an untripped position as shown in
Preferably connected to or integral with the pivot arm 330 is a curved finger 510 made to engage a normally closed switch 440, the switch providing a signal to keep the brush feed rollers turning. When the curved finger 510 engages the switch 440, as shown in
A link arm 450 is pivotally connected to the stop 420 at a first end. A second end, having a slot 460, is pivotally, slidably engaged to a pivot 470, as seen in
In
The lower feed stop bar 100 is shown in its most depressed position in
An additional feature of the instant invention is shown in
An additional feature of the present invention is seen by comparing
A flow chart of the logic of control with the lower feed stop bar 100 is shown in
The above embodiment is the preferred embodiment, but this invention is not limited thereto. It is, therefore, apparent that many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5692548 | Bouwers | Dec 1997 | A |
5692549 | Eggers | Dec 1997 | A |
6293479 | Kaczmarski et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
7011258 | O'Halloran et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7044409 | Stelter et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7121488 | Marriott et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
20020070301 | Stelter et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040108397 | O'Halloran | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070001038 | Bouwers et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070267526 | Uhrich et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080135653 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |