The present application claims priority under 37 U.S.C. § 371 to International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2020/032111, filed Aug. 26, 2020, which claims priority to and the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-156697, filed on Aug. 29, 2019. The contents of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The present invention relates to a lubricating oil composition satisfying particular requirements.
Petroleum products have the so-called temperature dependence of viscosity, that is, viscosity changes largely when temperature changes. For example, such as lubricating oil compositions used for such as automobiles preferably have small temperature dependence of viscosity. Accordingly, for the purpose of decreasing the temperature dependence of viscosity, a certain type of polymer soluble in a lubricating oil base is used in a lubricating oil as a viscosity adjusting agent.
As such viscosity adjusting agents for lubricating oils, ethylene-α-olefin copolymers are widely used, and in order to further improve the performance balance of lubricating oils, various improvements are made (see, for example, Patent Literature 1).
In recent years, because of the reduction of petroleum resources, and environmental problems such as global warming, the enhancement of the fuel consumption of automobiles intended for the reduction of the amounts of exhaust gas contaminants and CO2 discharged has been required. Fuel saving with a lubricating oil is excellent in cost effectiveness compared with the physical improvement of a lubricating machine and therefore expected as an important fuel saving technique, and the demand is increasing for fuel consumption enhancement with a lubricating oil.
Power loss in engines and transmissions is divided into friction loss in sliding portions and stirring loss due to the viscosity of lubricating oils. Particularly, an example of one measure for fuel saving with an engine oil include the reduction of viscosity resistance. As also seen from the fact that in recent years, not only conventional measurement under high temperature conditions but also measurement under relatively low temperature conditions has been added to fuel consumption tests, reducing viscosity resistance at low temperature is effective for fuel consumption improvement.
For the reduction of the viscosity resistance of an engine oil, viscosity lowering is effective. Particularly at low temperature, viscosity lowering is effective in the reduction of both friction loss and stirring loss.
For the reduction of low-temperature viscosity, the use of the polymer described in Patent Literature 1 is known. The polymer is such that it dissolves in a base oil at high temperature to obtain good thickening properties, and on the other hand, the solubility in the base oil is reduced at low temperature to reduce the influence on effective volume (flow rate) and viscosity.
The viscosity adjusting agent described in Patent Literature 1 provides the reduction of the low-temperature viscosity of a lubricating oil composition including the adjusting agent and makes a certain contribution to the enhancement of fuel consumption under a condition in which the engine internal temperature is low (for example, during engine starting). However, as the demand for fuel saving increases, further reduction of low-temperature viscosity is required.
Methods for improving the low-temperature characteristics of a lubricating oil composition in good balance include a method using an ethylene-propylene copolymer having a high ethylene content as a viscosity adjusting agent (see, for example, Patent Literature 2). When the ethylene content is increased, the low-temperature characteristics are enhanced, but the ethylene chain portion of the viscosity adjusting agent crystallizes at low temperature, and the storage stability of the lubricating oil composition in a low temperature environment may decrease.
The present invention aims to provide a lubricating oil composition having a higher viscosity index (lower temperature dependence of viscosity) and excellent in low-temperature viscosity characteristics.
The present inventors have studied diligently and, as a result, found that when a viscosity adjusting agent for lubricating oils satisfying particular requirements is used in an additive composition for lubricating oils, the above problems can be solved. Specifically, the present invention relates to the following [1] to [8].
The lubricating oil composition of the present invention can provide a lubricating oil composition having a higher viscosity index (lower temperature dependence of viscosity) and excellent in low-temperature viscosity characteristics.
The present invention will be specifically described below. In the following description, “to” indicating a numerical value range represents “or more to or less” unless otherwise noted.
<Lubricating Oil Composition>
The lubricating oil composition of the present invention includes a resin (A) and a base oil (B). The constituents will be described in detail below.
<Resin (A)>
The resin (A) that is one of the components constituting the lubricating oil composition satisfies the following requirements (A-1) to (A-3).
[Requirement (A-1)]
The resin (A) is a polymer including a constituent unit derived from 4-methyl-1-pentene in the range of 60 to 99 mol % and a constituent unit derived from an α-olefin having 2 to 20 carbon atoms (excluding 4-methyl-1-pentene) in the range of 1 to 40 mol % (provided that 4-methyl-1-pentene and the α-olefin is 100 mol % in total).
Examples of the α-olefin having 2 to 20 carbon atoms include linear α-olefins having 2 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably 2 to 15 carbon atoms, and more preferably 2 to 10 carbon atoms, such as ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, 1-decene, 1-undecene, 1-dodecene, 1-tetradecene, 1-hexadecene, 1-octadecene, and 1-eicosene, and branched α-olefins having 5 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably 5 to 15 carbon atoms, such as 3-methyl-1-butene, 3-methyl-1-pentene, 3-ethyl-1-pentene, 4,4-dimethyl-1-pentene, 4-methyl-1-hexene, 4,4-dimethyl-1-hexene, 4-ethyl-1-hexene, and 3-ethyl-1-hexene. Among these, ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, and 1-octene are preferred, ethylene and propylene are more preferred, and ethylene is particularly preferred.
The resin (A) according to the present invention preferably includes the constituent unit derived from 4-methyl-1-pentene in the range of 65 to 99 mol %. The resin (A) according to the present invention further preferably includes the constituent unit derived from 4-methyl-1-pentene in the range of 70 to 99 mol % based on all constituent units constituting the resin (A).
The resin (A) according to the present invention more preferably includes a constituent unit derived from ethylene in the range of 1 to 18 mol % (provided that 4-methyl-1-pentene and ethylene is 100 mol % in total).
The resin (A) according to the present invention further preferably includes the constituent unit derived from ethylene in the range of 11 to 16 mol % (provided that 4-methyl-1-pentene and ethylene is 100 mol in total %).
The resin (A) according to the present invention more preferably includes a constituent unit derived from propylene in the range of 1 to 22 mol % (provided that 4-methyl-1-pentene and propylene is 100 mol % in total).
The resin (A) according to the present invention further preferably includes the constituent unit derived from propylene in the range of 15 to 19 mol % (provided that 4-methyl-1-pentene and propylene is 100 mol % in total).
It is preferred that the resin (A) according to the present invention include the constituent unit derived from 4-methyl-1-pentene, and the constituent unit derived from propylene or ethylene, or the constituent unit derived from propylene in the ranges because the melting point (Tm) in the requirement (A-3) described later is easily adjusted in the desired range.
[Requirement (A-2)]
The resin (A) according to the present invention has an intrinsic viscosity [η] in the range of 0.01 to 5.0 dl/g as measured in decalin at 135° C. The resin (A) according to the present invention preferably has an intrinsic viscosity [η] in the range of 0.1 to 4.0 dl/g, more preferably 0.3 to 2.5 dl/g, as measured in decalin at 135° C. The resin (A) according to the present invention further preferably has an intrinsic viscosity [η] in the range of 0.5 to 2.0 dl/g as measured in decalin at 135° C.
The intrinsic viscosity [η] can be set within the above range by controlling, for example, the polymerization temperature and the molecular weight adjusting agent such as hydrogen during the polymerization of the resin (A). As the intrinsic viscosity [η] becomes higher, the viscosity of the resin (A) and the obtained viscosity adjusting agent for lubricating oils becomes higher. When the lubricating oil composition is obtained, the amount of the viscosity adjusting agent for lubricating oils blended is usually appropriately adjusted for adjustment to necessary physical properties as the lubricating oil composition, for example, a specific kinematic viscosity at 100° C. It is preferred that the intrinsic viscosity [η] of the resin (A) be in the above range because the amount of the obtained viscosity adjusting agent for lubricating oils blended can be in an appropriate ratio to the base oil. In addition, it is preferred that the intrinsic viscosity [η] of the resin (A) be in the above range because the shear stability is in a suitable range.
[Requirement (A-3)]
The resin (A) according to the present invention has a melting point (Tm) in the range of 110 to 150° C., preferably in the range of 115 to 145° C., as determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The resin (A) according to the present invention further preferably has a melting point (Tm) in the range of 120 to 140° C.
It is preferred that the resin (A) according to the present invention have a melting point (Tm) in the above range because it has a high viscosity index and low low-temperature viscosity.
In addition, when the resin (A) according to the present invention has a melting point (Tm) in the above range, resin pellets are difficult to block and handled well, and the resin (A) dissolves easily in the base oil (B) so that a uniform lubricating oil composition can be obtained, because the resin (A) includes a moderate amount of constituent unit derived from 4-methyl-1-pentene.
On the other hand, a resin having a melting point (Tm) of less than 110° C. has low releasability, and therefore resin pellets are easily blocked and difficult to handle. On the other hand, a resin having a melting point (Tm) of more than 150° C. has high crystallinity and therefore is difficult to dissolve in the base oil (B), and a concentrate becomes cloudy and gels, and is difficult to handle.
<Method for Producing Resin (A)>
The method for producing the resin (A) according to the present invention is not particularly limited as long as one satisfying the predetermined requirements can be obtained. When the resin (A) is a 4-methyl-1-pentene-α-olefin copolymer (wherein α-olefin refers to ethylene and an α-olefin having 20 or less carbon atoms), the resin (A) can be obtained by polymerizing 4-methyl-1-pentene and the α-olefin in the presence of an appropriate polymerization catalyst.
The copolymer can be produced, for example, by copolymerizing at least 4-methyl-1-pentene and an α-olefin having 2 to 20 carbon atoms using a catalyst including a compound containing a transition metal such as vanadium, zirconium, titanium, or hafnium, and at least one selected from an organoaluminum compound, an organoaluminum oxy compound, and an ionized ionic compound. Examples of the catalyst for olefin polymerization used at this time include, for example, the catalysts described in International Publication No. WO 00/34420. The content of the constituent units and melting point of the obtained copolymer can be controlled by changing the amounts of the monomers supplied. The intrinsic viscosity [η] can be controlled by changing the amount of hydrogen supplied.
<Base Oil (B)>
The base oil (B) according to the present invention satisfies the following requirement (B-1).
[Requirement (B-1)]
The kinematic viscosity at 100° C. is in the range of 1 to 50 mm2/s.
Examples of the base oil (B) according to the present invention include mineral oils; and synthetic oils such as poly-α-olefins, diesters, and polyalkylene glycols.
As the base oil (B) according to the present invention, a mineral oil or a blend of a mineral oil and a synthetic oil may be used. Examples of the diesters include, for example, polyol esters, dioctyl phthalate, and dioctyl sebacate.
Mineral oils are generally used through a refining step such as wax removal and have several grades by the way of refining. Generally, mineral oils including 0.5 to 10% of wax components are used. For example, highly refined oils having a low pour point and a high viscosity index and having a composition mainly including an isoparaffin that are produced by a hydrocracking refining method can also be used. Mineral oils having a kinematic viscosity of 10 to 200 mm2/s at 40° C. are generally used.
Mineral oils are generally used through a refining step such as wax removal and have several grades by the way of refining as described above, and the grades are provided in the API (American Petroleum Institute) classification. The characteristics of lubricating oil bases classified into groups are shown in Table 1.
The poly-α-olefins in Table 1 are hydrocarbon-based polymers obtained by polymerizing at least an α-olefin having 10 or more carbon atoms as one raw material monomer, and, for example, polydecene obtained by polymerizing 1-decene is illustrated.
As the base oil (B), the mineral oils belonging to the group (ii) or the group (iii), or the poly-α-olefins belonging to the group (iv) are preferred. The group (ii) and the group (iii) tend to have a lower wax concentration than the group (i). Among the mineral oils belonging to the group (ii) or the group (iii), those having a kinematic viscosity of 1 to 50 mm2/s at 100° C. are preferred.
<Content Ratio Between Resin (A) and Base Oil (B)>
In the lubricating oil composition of the present invention, the content ratio between the resin (A) and the base oil (B) is such that the resin (A) is in the range of 0.01 to 50 parts by mass per 100 parts by mass in total of the resin (A) and the base oil (B).
When the lubricating oil composition of the present invention is used, for example, for engine applications, the lubricating oil composition preferably includes 0.1 to 5 parts by mass of the resin (A) and 95 to 99.9 parts by mass of the base oil (B) [provided that the resin (A) and the base oil (B) is 100 parts by mass in total]. The resin (A) is preferably contained in the proportion of 0.2 to 4 parts by mass, more preferably 0.3 to 3 parts by mass, and further preferably 0.5 to 2 parts by mass, and the base oil (B) is preferably contained in the proportion of 96 to 99.8 parts by mass, more preferably 97 to 99.7 parts by mass, and further preferably 98 to 99.5 parts by mass. One resin (A) may be used alone, or a plurality of resins (A) may be used in combination.
On the other hand, when the lubricating oil composition of the present invention is used as a lubricating oil additive composition (so-called concentrate), the lubricating oil composition preferably includes the resin (A) and the base oil (B) in the ratio of 1 to 50 parts by mass to 50 to 99 parts by mass [provided that the resin (A) and the base oil (B) is 100 parts by mass in total]. The lubricating oil composition more preferably includes the resin (A) in the range of 2 to 40 parts by mass and the base oil (B) in the range of 60 to 98 parts by mass, more preferably the resin (A) in the range of 3 to 30 parts by mass and the base oil (B) in the range of 70 to 97 parts by mass.
When the lubricating oil composition of the present invention is used as a lubricating oil additive composition (so-called concentrate), usually, the lubricating oil composition generally includes no pour-point depressant (C) and other components (additives) described later or contains an antioxidant described later in the range of 0.01 to 1% by mass, preferably 0.05 to 0.5% by mass, as needed. The lubricating oil additive composition can be used for various applications as a lubricating oil composition by blending the base oil (B) and the pour-point depressant (C) and other components (additives) described later.
<Pour-Point Depressant (C)>
The lubricating oil composition of the present invention may further contain the pour-point depressant (C). The content of the pour-point depressant (C) is not particularly limited as long as the effect of the present invention is achieved. The pour-point depressant (C) is usually contained in an amount of 0.05 to 5% by mass, preferably 0.05 to 3% by mass, more preferably 0.05 to 2% by mass, and further preferably 0.05 to 1% by mass based on 100% by mass of the lubricating oil composition.
Examples of the pour-point depressant (C) that the lubricating oil composition of the present invention may contain include, for example, alkylated naphthalenes, (co)polymers of alkyl methacrylates, (co)polymers of alkyl acrylates, copolymers of alkyl fumarates and vinyl acetate, α-olefin polymers, and copolymers of α-olefins and styrene. Particularly, (co)polymers of alkyl methacrylates and (co)polymers of alkyl acrylates may be used.
<Other Components (Additives)>
The lubricating oil composition of the present invention may include other components (additives) other than the resin (A) and base oil (B). Examples of other components optionally include any one or more materials described later.
The content when the lubricating oil composition of the present invention contains additives is not particularly limited, and the content of the additives is usually more than 0% by mass, preferably 1% by mass or more, more preferably 3% by mass or more, and further preferably 5% by mass or more per 100% by mass in total of the base oil (B) and the additives. The content of the additives is usually 40% by mass or less, preferably 30% by mass or less, more preferably 20% by mass or less, and further preferably 15% by mass or less.
One of such additives is a detergent. Many conventional detergents used in the field of engine lubrication provide basicity or TBN to lubricating oils by the presence of basic metal compounds (typically metal hydroxides, metal oxides, and metal carbonates based on metals such as calcium, magnesium, and sodium). Such metallic perbasic detergents (also referred to as perbasic salts or ultrabasic salts) are usually single phase homogeneous Newtonian systems characterized by a metal content exceeding an amount that seems to be present for neutralization according to the stoichiometry of a metal and a particular acidic organic compound that reacts with the metal. A perbasic material is typically prepared by reacting an acidic material (typically an inorganic acid such as carbon dioxide or a lower carboxylic acid) with a mixture of an acidic organic compound (also referred to as substrate) and a metal salt in a stoichiometrically excess amount, typically in an organic solvent (for example, a mineral oil, naphtha, toluene, or xylene) inert to the acidic organic substrate. A small amount of an accelerating agent such as a phenol or an alcohol is optionally present. The acidic organic substrate will usually have a sufficient number of carbon atoms in order to provide a certain degree of solubility in oils.
Such conventional perbasic materials and methods for preparing these are well-known to those skilled in the art. Examples of patents describing techniques for making basic metal salts of sulfonic acids, carboxylic acids, phenols, phosphoric acids, and mixtures of two or more thereof include U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,501,731; 2,616,905; 2,616,911; 2,616,925; 2,777,874; 3,256,186; 3,384,585; 3,365,396; 3,320,162; 3,318,809; 3,488,284; and 3,629,109. Salixarate detergents are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,200,936 and International Publication No. WO 01/56968. A saligenin detergent is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,310,009.
The amount of a typical detergent in the lubricating oil composition is not particularly limited as long as the effect of the present invention is achieved. The amount of the typical detergent is usually 1 to 10% by mass, preferably 1.5 to 9.0% by mass, and more preferably 2.0 to 8.0% by mass. The amounts are all based on an oil-free state (that is, a state free from a diluent oil conventionally supplied to them).
Another additive is a dispersing agent. Dispersing agents are well-known in the field of lubricating oils, and examples of the dispersing agents mainly include those known as ashless dispersing agents and polymer dispersing agents. The ashless dispersing agents are characterized by a polar group attached to a hydrocarbon chain having a relatively large molecular weight. Examples of typical ashless dispersing agents include nitrogen-containing dispersing agents such as N-substituted long-chain alkenylsuccinimides, also known as succinimide dispersing agents. Succinimide dispersing agents are more sufficiently described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,234,435 and 3,172,892. Another class of ashless dispersing agents is high molecular weight esters prepared by the reaction of polyhydric aliphatic alcohols such as glycerol, pentaerythritol, and sorbitol with a hydrocarbyl acylating agent. Such materials are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 3,381,022. Another class of ashless dispersing agents is Mannich bases. These are materials formed by the condensation of a high molecular weight alkyl-substituted phenol, an alkylenepolyamine, and an aldehyde such as formaldehyde and are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 3,634,515. Examples of other dispersing agents include polyvalent dispersible additives, which are generally polymers based on hydrocarbons having polar functionality that provides dispersion characteristics to the above polymer.
The dispersing agent may be subjected to post-treatment by reacting it with any of various substances. Examples of these include urea, thiourea, dimercaptothiadiazole, carbon disulfide, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, hydrocarbon-substituted succinic anhydrides, nitriles, epoxides, boron compounds, and phosphorus compounds. References describing such treatment in detail are listed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,654,403. The amount of the dispersing agent in the composition of the present invention is not particularly limited as long as the effect of the present invention is achieved. The amount of the dispersing agent can be typically 1 to 10% by mass, preferably 1.5 to 9.0% by mass, and more preferably 2.0 to 8.0% by mass (all are based on an oil-free state).
Another component is an antioxidant. Antioxidants encompass phenolic antioxidants, and these may include butyl-substituted phenols having two to three t-butyl groups. The para position may be occupied by a hydrocarbyl group or a group bonding two aromatic rings. The latter antioxidant is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,559,105. The antioxidants also include aromatic amines such as nonylated diphenylamine. Examples of other antioxidants include sulfurized olefins, titanium compounds, and molybdenum compounds. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,285,822 discloses a lubricating oil composition including a composition including molybdenum and sulfur. A typical amount of the antioxidant will of course depend on the specific antioxidant and its individual effectiveness, but an exemplary total amount can be 0.01 to 5% by mass, preferably 0.15 to 4.5% by mass, and more preferably 0.2 to 4% by mass. Further, one or more antioxidants may be present, and with a particular combination of these, the combined overall effect of these can be synergistic.
A thickening agent (also sometimes referred to as a viscosity index improving agent or a viscosity adjusting agent) may be included in the lubricating oil additive composition. The thickening agent is usually a polymer, and examples thereof include, for example, polyisobutenes, polymethacrylates, diene polymers, polyalkylstyrenes, esterified styrene-maleic anhydride copolymers, alkenylarene conjugated diene copolymers, and polyolefins, hydrogenated SBR (styrene butadiene rubber), and SEBS (styrene ethylene butylene styrene block copolymer). A multifunctional thickening agent also having dispersibility and/or antioxidant properties is known and may be optionally used.
Another additive is an antiwear agent. Examples of the antiwear agent include phosphorus-containing antiwear agents/extreme pressure agents such as metal thiophosphates, phosphate esters and salts thereof, and phosphorus-containing carboxylic acids, esters, ethers, and amides; and phosphites. In a particular aspect, a phosphorus antiwear agent may usually be present in an amount that provides 0.01 to 0.2% by mass, preferably 0.015 to 0.15% by mass, more preferably 0.02 to 0.1% by mass, and further preferably 0.025 to 0.08% by mass of phosphorus, which is not particularly limited as long as the effect of the present invention is achieved.
In many cases, the antiwear agent is a zinc dialkyldithiophosphate (ZDP). A typical ZDP may include 11% by mass of P (calculated based on an oil-free state), and examples of a preferred amount may include 0.09 to 0.82% by mass. Examples of antiwear agents including no phosphorus include borate esters (including boric acid epoxides), dithiocarbamate compounds, molybdenum-containing compounds, and sulfurized olefins.
Examples of other additives that may be optionally used in the lubricating oil composition include, in addition to the extreme pressure agent and antiwear agent, a friction adjusting agent, a color stabilizer, a rust preventive, a metal deactivator, and an antifoaming agent, and each may be used in a conventionally known amount.
<Method for Producing Lubricating Oil Composition>
The lubricating oil composition of the present invention can be prepared by mixing the resin (A) and the base oil (B), optionally with other desired components, by a conventionally known method. The resin (A) is easy to handle and therefore may be optionally supplied as a concentrate in the base oil (B).
<Applications of Lubricating Oil Composition>
Any of diverse known mechanical apparatuses can be lubricated with the lubricating oil composition of the present invention, for example, as automobile engine oils, lubricating oils for diesel engines for heavy vehicles, lubricating oils for marine diesel engines, lubricating oils for two-stroke engines, lubricating oils for automatic transmissions and manual transmissions, gear lubricating oils, and greases.
The present invention will be more specifically described below based on Examples, but the present invention is not limited to these Examples.
In the following Production Examples, Examples, and Comparative Example, the physical properties were measured or evaluated by the following methods. The evaluation results of copolymers are shown in Table 2-1, Table 2-2, and Table 3, and the evaluation results of lubricating oil compositions are shown in Table 4-1 and Table 4-2. In Table 2-1 to Table 4-2, “-” means non-detected.
[Physical Properties of Copolymers]
<Content of Constituent Units>
The constituent units (mol %) derived from ethylene and the α-olefin in the copolymer produced or used in the Examples or the Comparative Example are obtained by the analysis of the 13C-NMR spectrum.
In Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, 4 MP-1 means a constituent unit derived from 4-methyl-1-pentene.
(Measuring Apparatus)
AVANCE III 500 CryoProbe Prodigy type nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus manufactured by Bruker BioSpin
(Measurement Conditions)
Measured nucleus: 13C (125 MHz), measurement mode: single-pulse proton broadband decoupling, pulse width: 45° (5.00 μs), number of points: 64 k, measurement range: 250 ppm (−55 to 195 ppm), repetition time: 5.5 s, number of accumulations: 512 times, measurement solvent: orthodichlorobenzene/benzene-d6 (4/1 v/v), sample concentration: ca. 60 mg/0.6 mL, measurement temperature: 120° C., window function: exponential (BF: 1.0 Hz), and chemical shift reference: benzene-d6 (128.0 ppm).
<Melting Point (Tm)>
A 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer produced in a Polymerization Example was preheated for 5 min using a hydraulic hot-press molding machine set at 190° C., then pressurized for 2 min, and cooled in a cooling tank set at 20° C. for 4 min within 1 min after the pressurization to make a pressed sheet having a thickness of 1 mm. This pressed sheet was stored at 23° C. for 3 days to provide a specimen.
The melting point (Tm) of the 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer was measured as follows, using a differential scanning calorimeter “X-DSC7000” manufactured by SII calibrated with an indium standard.
The measurement sample (4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer) was weighed on an aluminum DSC pan so as to be about 10 mg. A lid was crimped onto the pan to place the sample under a sealed atmosphere to obtain a sample pan. The sample pan was placed in a DSC cell, and an empty aluminum pan was placed as a reference. The DSC cell was heated from −20° C. to 150° C. at 10° C./min under a nitrogen atmosphere (first heating process).
The melting peak top temperature of the enthalpy curve obtained in the first heating process was taken as the melting point (Tm). When two or more melting peaks were present, the maximum peak temperature was defined as Tm. No melting point being observed means that the sample is amorphous.
<Intrinsic viscosity [η] (dl/g)>
The intrinsic viscosity [η] of a copolymer was measured at 135° C. using a decalin solvent. Specifically, about 20 mg of a powder, pellets, or a resin lump of a copolymer was dissolved in 15 ml of decalin, and the specific viscosity ηsp was measured in an oil bath at 135° C. 5 ml of a decalin solvent was added to this decalin solution for dilution, and then the specific viscosity ηsp was measured in the same manner. This dilution operation was further repeated two times, and the value of ηsp/C when the concentration (C) was extrapolated to 0 was obtained as the intrinsic viscosity (see the formula below).
[η]=lim(ηsp/C)(C→0)
[Physical Properties of Lubricating Oil Compositions]
Various physical properties of the lubricating oil compositions obtained in the Examples and the Comparative Example were measured as follows.
<Kinematic Viscosity (KV)>
The kinematic viscosity at 100° C. and 40° C. of the lubricating oil composition prepared in the Examples or the Comparative Example was measured based on ASTMD445.
<Viscosity Index (VI)>
The viscosity index (VI) was calculated based on ASTM D2270 using the results of the kinematic viscosity (KV) at 40° C. and 100° C. of the lubricating oil composition measured based on ASTM D445.
<Shear Stability Index (SSI)>
The SSI of the mineral oil-blended lubricating oil composition prepared in the Examples or the Comparative Example was measured by an ultrasonic method with reference to the JPI-5S-29-88 provisions. The lubricating oil composition was irradiated with ultrasonic waves, and the SSI was measured from the kinematic viscosity decrease rate before and after the irradiation. The SSI is a measure of a decrease in kinematic viscosity due to the fact that the copolymer component in the lubricating oil is subjected to shear force under sliding and the molecular chain is cut. As the value of SSI becomes larger, a larger decrease in kinematic viscosity is indicated.
(Measuring Apparatus)
US-300TCVP type ultrasonic shear stability test apparatus (manufactured by Primtech)
(Measurement Conditions)
(Measurement Method)
30 ml of a sample was taken in a sample container and irradiated with ultrasonic waves with an output voltage of 4.2 V for 30 min. The kinematic viscosity of the sample oil at 100° C. before and after the ultrasonic irradiation was measured, and the SSI was obtained by the formula shown below:
SSI (%)=100×(Vo−Vs)/(Vo−Vb)
<Cold Cranking Simulator (CCS) Viscosity>
The CCS viscosity (−35° C.) of the mineral oil-blended lubricating oil composition prepared in the Examples or the Comparative Example was measured based on ASTM D2602. The CCS viscosity is used for the evaluation of the slidability (startability) of a crankshaft at low temperature. As the value becomes smaller, better low-temperature viscosity (low-temperature characteristics) of the lubricating oil is indicated.
When blending is performed for lubricating oil compositions so that the kinematic viscosity at 100° C. is at the same level, and the lubricating oil compositions are compared, the lubricating oil composition becomes better in fuel saving properties at low temperature (low-temperature startability) as the CCS viscosity of the lubricating oil composition becomes lower.
The Examples and the Comparative Example will be described below. In order to ensure an amount necessary for analysis as well as evaluation for lubricating oil adjusting agent, polymerization may be carried out a plurality of times.
For a catalyst (A) and a catalyst (B) used in Polymerization Examples, the following compounds were used.
Catalyst (A): A metallocene compound synthesized according to a synthesis example in International Publication No. WO 2006/025540, diphenylmethylene(3-tert-butyl-5-ethylcyclopentadienyl) (2,7-di-tert-butylfluorenyl)zirconium dichloride, was used as the “catalyst (A)”.
Catalyst (B): A metallocene compound synthesized according to a synthesis example in International Publication No. WO 2015/122414, [bis(4-methoxyphenyl)methylene(η5-cyclopentadienyl) (η5-tetramethyloctahydrodibenzofluorenyl)]hafnium dichloride, was used as the “catalyst (B)”.
A magnetic stirring bar was placed in a sufficiently dried and nitrogen-purged Schlenk tube, and 9.26 μmol of the catalyst (A) as a metallocene compound was placed. A suspension of modified methylaluminoxane in an amount of 300 equivalents (n-hexane solvent, 2.76 mmol in terms of aluminum atoms) based on the catalyst (A) was added at room temperature with stirring, and then heptane was added in such an amount that the concentration of the catalyst (A) was 1.0 μmol/mL, to prepare a catalyst liquid.
750 mL of 4-methyl-1-pentene and 1.5 mL of a hexane solution of triisobutylaluminum (Al=0.50 M, 0.75 mmol) were charged into a sufficiently dried and nitrogen-purged SUS autoclave having an internal volume of 1,500 ml, and then heated to a polymerization temperature of 60° C. while being stirred at 850 revolutions/min. 17.8 NmL of hydrogen was added at the temperature, and then nitrogen was added until the autoclave internal pressure reached 0.34 MPaG. Further, pressurization was performed with ethylene until the total pressure reached 0.60 MPaG, to set the ethylene partial pressure at 0.26 MPa.
1.0 mL (amount of catalyst: 1.0 μmol) of the catalyst liquid prepared above and 3.0 mL of heptane were charged together into this autoclave to initiate polymerization, and ethylene was supplied until the stopping of the polymerization so as to maintain a total pressure of 0.6 MPaG. Methanol was added 10 min after the initiation of the polymerization to stop the polymerization.
The polymerization liquid taken out of the cooled/depressurized autoclave was introduced into a methanol/acetone (=3/1 [volume ratio]) mixed liquid to precipitate the polymer, and the polymer was filtered and collected. Subsequently, the collected polymer was dried under reduced pressure at 80° C. for 12 h to obtain 94.4 g of a polymer for evaluation.
Operations were performed in the same manner as Polymerization Example 1 except that the polymerization conditions were changed as described in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, to obtain polymers for evaluation.
A magnetic stirring bar was placed in a sufficiently dried and nitrogen-purged Schlenk tube, and 10.36 μmol of the catalyst (A) as a metallocene compound was placed. A suspension of modified methylaluminoxane in an amount of 300 equivalents (n-hexane solvent, 3.11 mmol in terms of aluminum atoms) based on the catalyst (A) was added at room temperature with stirring, and then heptane was added in such an amount that the concentration of the catalyst (A) was 1.0 μmol/mL, to prepare a catalyst liquid.
750 mL of 4-methyl-1-pentene and 1.36 mL of a hexane solution of triisobutylaluminum (Al=0.55 M, 0.75 mmol) were charged into a sufficiently dried and nitrogen-purged SUS autoclave having an internal volume of 1,500 ml, and then heated to a polymerization temperature of 60° C. while being stirred at 850 revolutions/min. 8.9 NmL of hydrogen was added at the temperature, and then nitrogen was added until the autoclave internal pressure reached 0.40 MPaG. Further, pressurization was performed with propylene until the total pressure reached 0.60 MPaG, to set the propylene partial pressure at 0.20 MPa.
1.0 mL (amount of catalyst: 1.0 μmol) of the catalyst liquid prepared above and 3.0 mL of heptane were charged together into this autoclave to initiate polymerization, and propylene was supplied until the stopping of the polymerization so as to maintain a total pressure of 0.6 MPaG. Methanol was added 10 min after the initiation of the polymerization to stop the polymerization.
The polymerization liquid taken out of the cooled/depressurized autoclave was introduced into a methanol/acetone (=3/1 [volume ratio]) mixed liquid to precipitate the polymer, and the polymer was filtered and collected. Subsequently, the collected polymer was dried under reduced pressure at 80° C. for 12 h to obtain 45.5 g of a polymer for evaluation.
Operations were performed in the same manner as Polymerization Example 12 except that the polymerization conditions were changed as described in Table 2-2, to obtain polymers for evaluation.
Operations were performed in the same manner as Polymerization Example 12 except that the solvent charged into the SUS autoclave was changed from 750 mL of 4-methyl-1-pentene to a mixed solvent of 400 mL of 4-methyl-1-pentene and 200 mL of heptane, to obtain 56.5 g of a polymer for evaluation.
Operations were performed in the same manner as Polymerization Example 16 except that the polymerization conditions were changed as described in Table 2-2, to obtain polymers for evaluation.
The physical properties of the polymers obtained in the Polymerization Examples are shown in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2.
500 ml of xylene was placed in a sufficiently nitrogen-purged glass reactor having an internal volume of 1.0 L and then heated to 90° C., and ethylene and propylene were continuously supplied at 99 l/h and 36.0 l/h respectively, while the interior of the polymerization vessel was stirred at 600 rpm, to saturate the liquid phase and the gas phase. Then, in a state in which ethylene and propylene were continuously supplied, 6.0 mL (6.0 mmol) of a toluene solution of triisobutylaluminum (also described as iBu3Al) (1.0 mol/L), 3.0 mL (0.030 mmol) of a toluene solution of the catalyst (B) (0.010 mol/L), and then 12.0 mL (0.120 mmol) of a toluene solution of triphenylcarbenium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate (also described as Ph3CB(C6F5)4) (0.010 mol/L) were added to perform polymerization under normal pressure at 90° C. for 40 min. The polymerization was stopped by adding a small amount of isobutanol. The obtained polymerization reaction liquid was washed with dilute hydrochloric acid and separated to obtain an organic layer, and the organic layer was introduced into a large amount of methanol to precipitate an ethylene-propylene copolymer. The ethylene-propylene copolymer obtained by filtration was dried under reduced pressure at 130° C. for 10 h. The analysis results of the ethylene-propylene copolymer are shown in Table 3.
Lubricating oil compositions were prepared using the ethylene-α-olefin copolymers obtained in the Polymerization Examples, as viscosity adjusting agents for lubricating oils. The amount of the ethylene-α-olefin copolymer blended was adjusted so that the kinematic viscosity of the lubricating oil composition at 100° C. was about 8.0 mm2/s.
The blending composition was as follows:
Note (*) additives=a conventional additive package for GF-5 engine oils including Ca and Na perbasic detergents, a N-containing dispersing agent, aminic and phenolic antioxidants, zinc dialkyldithiophosphates, a friction adjusting agent, and an antifoaming agent.
The evaluation results are shown in Table 4-1 and Table 4-2.
The Examples have a high viscosity index with respect to the Comparative Example and the Reference Examples. In addition, it is seen that the Examples also have low CCS viscosity with respect to the Comparative Example.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2019-156697 | Aug 2019 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2020/032111 | 8/26/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/039818 | 3/4/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2501731 | Mertes | Mar 1950 | A |
2616905 | Asseff | Nov 1952 | A |
2616911 | Asseff | Nov 1952 | A |
2616925 | Asseff | Nov 1952 | A |
2777874 | Asseff | Jan 1957 | A |
3076764 | Hansen et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
3090821 | Voltz | May 1963 | A |
3172892 | Le | Mar 1965 | A |
3256186 | Greenwalkd | Jun 1966 | A |
3265622 | Anderson | Aug 1966 | A |
3318809 | Bray | May 1967 | A |
3320162 | Axe | May 1967 | A |
3365396 | Schilcht | Jan 1968 | A |
3381022 | Le Suer | Apr 1968 | A |
3384585 | Gragson | May 1968 | A |
3488284 | Lesuer | Jan 1970 | A |
3629109 | Gergel et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3634515 | Piasek | Jan 1972 | A |
4076924 | Toyota et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4085276 | Toyota et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4143223 | Toyota et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4157435 | Toyota et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4232139 | Minami et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4234435 | Meinhardt et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4250285 | Minami et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4285822 | Devries et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4315874 | Ushida et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4330649 | Kioka et al. | May 1982 | A |
4335015 | Imai et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4401589 | Kioka et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4490513 | Minami et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4654403 | Tipton | Mar 1987 | A |
4742139 | Kioka et al. | May 1988 | A |
4892851 | Ewen et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4952649 | Kioka et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5036034 | Ewen | Jul 1991 | A |
5155080 | Elder et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158920 | Razavi | Oct 1992 | A |
5162278 | Razavi | Nov 1992 | A |
5223467 | Razavi | Jun 1993 | A |
5223468 | Razavi | Jun 1993 | A |
5225500 | Elder et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5243002 | Razavi | Sep 1993 | A |
5278265 | Razavi | Jan 1994 | A |
5292838 | Razavi | Mar 1994 | A |
5304523 | Razavi | Apr 1994 | A |
5334677 | Razavi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5561092 | Ewen et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5583188 | Kashiwa et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589556 | Razavi | Dec 1996 | A |
5763549 | Elder et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5807939 | Elder et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5883202 | Ewen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6200936 | Moreton | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6310009 | Kocsis et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6369175 | Ewen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6399549 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417120 | Mitchler et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6525007 | Okada et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6559105 | Abraham et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6589920 | Okada et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6939928 | Kawai et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7589145 | Brant et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7803888 | Kawahara | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8921291 | Wu et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
10040884 | Harada et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
11162050 | Hayakawa | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20020035044 | Okada et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020055445 | Okada et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020107153 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020155776 | Mitchler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030055179 | Ota et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050228155 | Kawai et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060199896 | Walton et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070249508 | Matsuda et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080125561 | Matsuda et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090023619 | Kaneshige et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20120190601 | Ikeda et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130052464 | Kawabe et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20150239996 | Funaya et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160376385 | Funaya et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170327610 | Funaya et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170327611 | Funaya et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20190048109 | Tanaka | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20200140776 | Hayakawa | May 2020 | A1 |
20210032397 | Tanaka | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210139622 | Tanaka | May 2021 | A1 |
20220041847 | Hashimoto | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220235157 | Tanaka | Jul 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 148 115 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 148 115 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2 311 914 | Apr 2011 | EP |
1 178 102 | Aug 2017 | EP |
1 178 102 | Feb 2022 | EP |
1 057 716 | Feb 1967 | GB |
1 124 016 | Aug 1968 | GB |
S50-108385 | Aug 1975 | JP |
S50-126590 | Oct 1975 | JP |
S51-020297 | Feb 1976 | JP |
S51-028189 | Mar 1976 | JP |
S51-064586 | Jun 1976 | JP |
S51-092885 | Aug 1976 | JP |
S51-136625 | Nov 1976 | JP |
S52-087489 | Jul 1977 | JP |
S52-100596 | Aug 1977 | JP |
S52-104593 | Sep 1977 | JP |
S52-147688 | Dec 1977 | JP |
S53-002580 | Jan 1978 | JP |
S53-040093 | Apr 1978 | JP |
S53-043094 | Apr 1978 | JP |
S55-135102 | Oct 1980 | JP |
S55-135103 | Oct 1980 | JP |
S56-000811 | Jan 1981 | JP |
S56-011908 | Feb 1981 | JP |
S56-018606 | Feb 1981 | JP |
S58-083006 | May 1983 | JP |
S58-138705 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S58-138706 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S58-138707 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S58-138708 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S58-138709 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S58-138710 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S58-138715 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S63-057615 | Mar 1988 | JP |
H02-041303 | Feb 1990 | JP |
H03-193796 | Aug 1991 | JP |
H07-025844 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2003-105365 | Apr 2003 | JP |
5798113 | Oct 2015 | JP |
WO-0034420 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0060032 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0127124 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0153369 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO-0156968 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-2006109631 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2008047878 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2014050817 | Apr 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 4, 2020 for corresponding European Patent Application No. 17888281.7. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2017/046641, dated Mar. 6, 2018. |
International Searching Authority, “Written Opinion,” issued in connection with International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2017/046641, dated Mar. 6, 2018. |
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 16/473,399 dated Jul. 9, 2021. |
U.S. Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 16/473,399 dated Jan. 1, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220275304 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |