Applications of the present invention generally relate to medical image processing. Specifically, applications of the present invention relate to background cleaning in images of body lumens and body cavities.
Vascular catheterizations, such as coronary catheterizations, are frequently-performed medical interventions. Such interventions are typically performed in order to diagnose the blood vessels for potential disease, and/or to treat diseased blood vessels. Typically, in order to facilitate visualization of blood vessels, the catheterization is performed under extraluminal imaging. Typically, and in order to highlight the vasculature during such imaging, a contrast agent is periodically injected into the applicable vasculature. The contrast agent typically remains in the vasculature only momentarily. During the time that the contrast agent is present in the applicable vasculature, the contrast agent typically hides, in full or in part, or obscures, devices positioned or deployed within that vasculature.
The following articles do not necessarily pertain to medical procedures or body organs, but yet serve as a useful technical background.
An article entitled “Nonlocal linear image regularization and supervised segmentation,” by Gilboa and Osher (SIAM Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, volume 6, issue 2, pp. 595-630, 2007), which is incorporated herein by reference, describes how a nonlocal quadratic functional of weighted differences is examined. The weights are based on image features and represent the affinity between different pixels in the image. By prescribing different formulas for the weights, one can generalize many local and nonlocal linear de-noising algorithms, including the nonlocal means filter and the bilateral filter. In this framework one can show that continuous iterations of the generalized filter obey certain global characteristics and converge to a constant solution. The linear operator associated with the Euler-Lagrange equation of the functional is closely related to the graph Laplacian. Thus, the steepest descent for minimizing the functional as a nonlocal diffusion process may be determined. This formulation allows a convenient framework for nonlocal variational minimizations, including variational denoising, Bregman iterations and the recently-proposed inverse-scale-space. The authors demonstrate how the steepest descent flow can be used for segmentation. Following kernel based methods in machine learning, the generalized diffusion process is used to propagate sporadic initial user's information to the entire image. The process is not explicitly based on a curve length energy and thus can cope well with highly non-convex shapes and corners. Reasonable robustness to noise is achieved.
An article entitled “Nonlocal Operators with Applications to Image Processing,” by Gilboa and Osher (SIAM Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, volume 7, issue 3, pp. 1005-1028, 2008), which is incorporated herein by reference, describes the use of nonlocal operators to define types of flows and functionals for image processing and other applications. The authors describe a main advantage of the technique over classical Partial-Differential-Equation-based (PDE-based) algorithms as being the ability to handle better textures and repetitive structures. This topic can be viewed as an extension of spectral graph theory and the diffusion geometry framework to functional analysis and PDE-like evolutions. Some possible applications and numerical examples of the technique are provided, as is a general framework for approximating Hamilton-Jacobi equations on arbitrary grids in high dimensions, e.g., for control theory.
An article entitled “Non-local regularization of inverse problem,” by Peyre, Bougleux, and Cohenin (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2008, Volume 5304/2008, pp. 57-68), which is incorporated herein by reference, proposes a new framework to regularize linear inverse problems using the total variation on non-local graphs. A nonlocal graph allows adaptation of the penalization to the geometry of the underlying function to recover. A fast algorithm computes, iteratively, both the solution of the regularization process and the non-local graph adapted to this solution.
An article entitled “The split Bregman method for L1 regularized problems,” by Goldstein and Osher (SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 323-343), which is incorporated herein by reference, notes that the class of 11-regularized optimization problems has received much attention recently because of the introduction of “compressed sensing,” which allows images and signals to be reconstructed from small amounts of data. Despite this recent attention, many 11-regularized problems still remain difficult to solve, or require techniques that are very problem-specific. The authors show that Bregman iteration can be used to solve a wide variety of constrained optimization problems. Using this technique, the authors propose a “Split Bregman” method, which can solve a very broad class of 11-regularized problems.
In an article entitled “Bregmanized nonlocal regularization for reconvolution and sparse reconstruction,” by Zhang, Burgery, Bresson, and Osher (SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 3, Issue 3, July 2010), which is incorporated herein by reference, the authors propose two algorithms based on Bregman iteration and operator splitting technique for nonlocal TV regularization problems. The convergence of the algorithms is analyzed and applications to deconvolution and sparse reconstruction are presented.
Some applications of the present invention are applied to medical procedures performed, in whole or in part, on or within luminal body structures or body cavities. For some applications, apparatus and methods are provided for facilitating the visualization of devices positioned or deployed within a lumen or cavity at a time when the lumen or cavity is injected with contrast agent.
It should be appreciated that while using coronary catheterization as a primary example, applications of the current invention may be applied to any medical procedure in which a medical device is positioned or deployed within a body lumen or cavity, while the lumen or cavity is injected with a substance for the purpose of better discerning that lumen or cavity by means of medical imaging. Such lumens or cavities include, without limitation, any lumen or cavity of the cardiovascular system, the gastro-intestinal tract, the respiratory tract, the urinary tract, the nasal cavities, and/or any other bodily lumen or cavity.
There is therefore provided, in accordance with some applications of the present invention, apparatus for use with an input angiogram image of a device inserted inside a portion of a body of a subject, the device including radiopaque portions thereof, the angiogram image being acquired in the presence of contrast agent within the body portion, and for use with a display, the apparatus including:
at least one processor that includes:
For some applications, the background-image-generation functionality is configured to generate the background image by:
in the background image, assigning pixel values to the first pixel and the second pixel that are more similar to one another, than the similarity of pixel values that are assigned to a third pixel and a fourth pixel,
based upon the first pixel and the second pixel having more similar surroundings to one another in the input image, than a similarity of surroundings of the third pixel and the fourth pixel to one another in the input image.
For some applications, the background-image-generation functionality is configured to generate the background image by assigning values to the first and second pixels based upon values of the first pixel and the second pixel in the input image.
For some applications, the output-generation functionality is configured to drive the display to display the cleaned image.
For some applications:
the input angiogram image of the device includes a plurality of input angiogram images of the device,
the cleaned-image-generation functionality is configured to generate a plurality of cleaned images, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input angiogram images, and
the output-generation functionality is configured to:
For some applications:
the input angiogram image of the device includes a plurality of input angiogram images of the device,
the cleaned-image-generation functionality is configured to generate a plurality of cleaned images, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input angiogram images, and
the output-generation functionality is configured to:
For some applications:
the input angiogram image of the device includes a plurality of input angiogram images of the device,
the cleaned-image-generation functionality is configured to generate a plurality of cleaned images, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input angiogram images, and
the output-generation functionality is configured to:
For some applications:
the input angiogram image of the device includes a plurality of input angiogram images of the device,
the cleaned-image-generation functionality is configured to generate a plurality of cleaned images, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input angiogram images, and
the output-generation functionality is configured to:
For some applications:
the portion of the subject's body includes a lumen of the subject's body,
the device includes an endoluminal data-acquisition device configured to acquire endoluminal data points while the device is at respective locations within the lumen, and
the output-generation functionality is configured:
For some applications:
the portion of the subject's body includes a lumen of the subject's body,
the device includes an endoluminal data-acquisition device configured to acquire endoluminal data points while the device is at respective locations within the lumen, and
the output-generation functionality is configured:
based upon locations of the radiopaque portions of the device in the cleaned image, to determine that the endoluminal device is at a given location within the lumen, and
in response to the determining that the endoluminal device is at the given location within the lumen, to drive the display to display an endoluminal image of the lumen corresponding to the location.
There is further provided, in accordance with some applications of the present invention, a method for use with an input angiogram image of a device inserted inside a portion of a body of a subject, the device including radiopaque portions thereof, the angiogram image being acquired in the presence of contrast agent within the body portion, the method including:
generating, with a processor, a background image in which a relative value is assigned to a first pixel with respect to a second pixel, at least partially based upon relative values of surroundings of the first pixel and surroundings of the second pixel in the input image;
generating, with the processor, a cleaned image in which visibility of the radiopaque portions of the device is increased relative to the input image, by dividing the input image by the background image; and
generating an output on a display, based upon the cleaned image.
For some applications, generating the background image includes:
in the background image, assigning pixel values to the first pixel and the second pixel that are more similar to one another, than the similarity of pixel values that are assigned to a third pixel and a fourth pixel,
based upon the first pixel and the second pixel having more similar surroundings to one another in the input image, than a similarity of surroundings of the third pixel and the fourth pixel to one another in the input image.
For some applications, generating the background image further includes assigning values to the first and second pixels based upon values of the first pixel and the second pixel in the input image.
For some applications, generating the output includes displaying the cleaned image.
For some applications,
the input angiogram image of the device includes a plurality of input angiogram images of the device,
generating the cleaned image includes generating a plurality of cleaned images, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input angiogram images,
the method further includes generating a stabilized image stream by image tracking the cleaned images with respect to each other, based upon locations of the radiopaque portions of the device in the cleaned images, and
generating the output includes displaying the stabilized image stream.
For some applications,
the input angiogram image of the device includes a plurality of input angiogram images of the device,
generating the cleaned image includes generating a plurality of cleaned images, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input angiogram images,
the method further includes generating a stabilized image stream by image tracking the input images with respect to each other, based upon locations of the radiopaque portions of the device in the corresponding cleaned images, and
generating the output includes displaying the stabilized image stream.
For some applications,
the input angiogram image of the device includes a plurality of input angiogram images of the device,
generating the cleaned image includes generating a plurality of cleaned images, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input angiogram images,
the method further includes generating an enhanced image frame by:
generating the output includes displaying the enhanced image frame.
For some applications,
the input angiogram image of the device includes a plurality of input angiogram images of the device,
generating the cleaned image includes generating a plurality of cleaned images, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input angiogram images,
the method further includes generating an enhanced image frame by:
generating the output includes displaying the enhanced image frame.
For some applications,
the portion of the subject's body includes a lumen of the subject's body,
the device includes an endoluminal data-acquisition device configured to acquire endoluminal data points while the device is at respective locations within the lumen,
the method further includes, based upon locations of the radiopaque portions of the device in the cleaned image, determining that a given one of the endoluminal data points corresponds to a given location within the lumen, and
generating the output includes generating the output in response to the determining.
For some applications,
the portion of the subject's body includes a lumen of the subject's body,
the device includes an endoluminal device configured to be moved through the lumen,
the method further includes, based upon locations of the radiopaque portions of the device in the cleaned image, determining that the endoluminal device is at a given location within the lumen, and
generating the output includes, in response to the determining that the endoluminal device is at the given location within the lumen, generating an endoluminal image of the lumen corresponding to the location.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings, in which:
References is now made to
In accordance with some applications of the present invention, an input image acquired by an imaging device 10 (
Typically, in a first step, an input image u0 (
Subsequent to the input image being inputted, a background image is generated by background-image-generation functionality 13, in accordance with the techniques described hereinbelow.
In the input image, pixels that are near to each other and that lie on the same object, are expected to have approximately the same value. For example, pixels lying on the ribs are expected to have approximately the same value as one another, and pixels lying inside a blood vessel are expected to have approximately the same value as one another. Thus, portions (i.e., pieces) of the input image are expected to have generally homogenous pixel values. However, the input image is not expected to be totally homogenous, since not all pixels lie on the same object. For example, pixels that lie on a rib are expected to have different values from pixels lying on a blood vessel. Thus, the values of the pixels in the input image can be assumed to be generally piecewise homogenous.
The assumption of piecewise homogeneity generally holds for the majority of the image pixels. However, the assumption fails to hold with respect to a portion of the pixels. An example of such pixels is that of the pixels that correspond to the radiopaque portions of an inserted device (e.g., radiopaque markers of a catheter). The values of such pixels are typically different from the values of their surrounding pixels, the surrounding pixels corresponding to the surrounding anatomy (e.g., a blood vessel in which the catheter is placed). Thus, these pixels are non-homogenous with respect to surrounding pixels.
For the purpose of the present invention, the non-homogeneous pixels are considered to be the foreground of the input image. An image that does not contain the non-homogeneous pixels (or in which the visibility of the non-homogeneous pixels is reduced), but which contains the piecewise homogenous pixels is considered to the background image. Thus, in accordance with the present invention, a background image is computed in which large contiguous piecewise homogenous image parts are enhanced relative to the input image, while the non-homogeneous pixels are made less visible relative to the input image. The background image is typically more homogeneous than the input image, and, in the background image, features of the subject's anatomy typically are enhanced relative to the input image, while the visibility of features of the tool is typically reduced relative to the input image.
The background image is typically computed by assigning a relative value to a first pixel in the background image with respect to a second pixel in the background image, based upon the relative values of the surroundings of the first pixel (e.g., a patch of pixels surrounding the first pixel) and the surroundings of the second pixel (e.g., a patch of pixels surrounding the first pixel) in the input image. Thus, pixels that have more similarly appearing surroundings in the input image are assigned more similar values to one another in the background image than pixels that have less similarly appearing surroundings in the input image. Typically, in computing the background image, the aforementioned method for assigning pixel values is traded-off against keeping the value of any given pixel in the background image similar to the value of the pixel in the input image.
For some applications, the background image is generated by computing a background image that is such as to reduce (e.g., that is such as to minimize) the cost of the following function:
in which:
The first term of Function 1 (i.e., the term in the brackets that appears before the “plus” sign) favors a background image whose pixel values are close to the pixel values of the input image. The second term of Function 1 (i.e., the term in the brackets that appears after the “plus” sign) favors a background image in which pixels the surroundings of which have similar values in the input image, have similar values in the background image. Thus, the resulting background image is typically similar to the input image, and at the same time is typically more homogenous than the input image, giving similar values to similar pixels. λ is a constant that represents the value of the trade-off between the first term and the second term of Function 1, i.e., the trade-off between (a) generating a background image in which the pixels have similar values to the values of the pixels in the input image and (b) generating an image in which the relative values of the pixels in the background image is based upon similarities between patches surrounding respective pixels in the input image. For some applications, the value of λ is set empirically, by testing different values on a wide range of benchmark input images.
For some applications, the background image is generated in accordance with minimization techniques described in “Nonlocal linear image regularization and supervised segmentation,” by Guy Gilboa and Stanley Osher (SIAM Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, volume 6, issue 2, pp. 595630, 2007), and/or in “Nonlocal Operators with Applications to Image Processing,” by Guy Gilboa and Stanley Osher (SIAM Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, volume 7, issue 3, pp. 1005-1028, 2008), both of which articles are incorporated herein by reference. Alternatively or additionally, other minimization techniques are used, such those described in “Non-local regularization of inverse problem,” by Gabriel Peyre, Sebastien Bougleux, and Laurent Cohenin (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2008, Volume 5304/2008, pp. 57-68), “The split Bregman method for L1 regularized problems,” by Tom Goldstein and Stanley Osher (SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 323-343), and/or in “Bregmanized nonlocal regularization for reconvolution and sparse reconstruction,” by Xiaoqun Zhang, Martin Burgery, Xavier Bresson, and Stanley Osher (SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 3, Issue 3, July 2010), all of which articles are incorporated herein by reference.
For some applications, an algorithm as described in “Bregmanized nonlocal regularization for reconvolution and sparse reconstruction,” by Zhang et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, is used to generate the background image. For example, algorithm 1 described on Page 17 of the aforementioned article may be used to generate the background image.
For some applications, the weight measure that is used to compute the background image (e.g., in accordance with Function 1, described hereinabove) is computed using the following technique. Given an input image, the processor of the system computes a weight measure between each pixel x in the image, and pixels in the vicinity of pixel x. The weight measure measures the similarity between small image patches centered on respective pixels x. For example, the similarity may be measured by an inverse of the weighted sum of squared differences between these patches. For some applications, the inverse of the weighted sum of squared differences is weighted by a Guassian, e.g., in accordance with techniques described in “A non-local algorithm for image denoising,” by Buades, Coll and Morell (IEEE CVPR 2005, volume 2, pages 60-65), which is incorporated herein by reference.
Typically, subsequent to the generation of the background image of the lumen, a cleaned image is generated by cleaned-image-generation functionality 14, by dividing the input image by the background image. (It should be noted that, throughout the description of the present invention, “dividing the input image by the background image” should be interpreted as being synonymous with “subtracting the background image from the input image” with respect to the mathematical operations that are performed by processor 11.) Typically, in the resulting cleaned image, image elements which are not homogeneous inside the lumen (such as the radiopaque markers of the device inserted in the vessel) remain visible while the vessel itself appears, in whole or in part, “clean” of contrast agent, at least relative to the input image.
Although some of the techniques described herein have been described with reference to an angiogram of a device that in inserted the into the coronary artery, the scope of the present invention includes applying the techniques to images of other body lumen and/or body cavities, mutatis mutandis. For example, the techniques described herein may be applied to an angiogram of the aorta that has an aortic replacement valve placed therein. Alternatively or additionally, the techniques described herein may be applied to an angiogram of a heart chamber that has a replacement valve placed therein. Further alternatively or additionally, the techniques described herein may be applied to an angiogram of a heart ventricle that has a ventricular assist device placed therein.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
For some applications, a series of cleaned image frames are used to create a stabilized image stream of an angiographic sequence, in which, typically, radiopaque elements of a device (e.g., markers of a catheter carrying a stent) appear relatively stable. Typically, the stabilized image stream of the angiographic sequence is generated in accordance with techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/650,605 to Cohen (published as US 2010/0172556) and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/075,244 to Tolkowsky (published as US 2008/0221442), both of which applications are incorporated herein by reference. The stabilized image stream is typically displayed on display 16. For some applications, a plurality of cleaned images are generated, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input images. The input images are stabilized such as to generate a stabilized image stream, based upon the locations of the radiopaque elements of the device in the corresponding cleaned images. Alternatively or additionally, a cleaned, stabilized image stream is generated by stabilizing the cleaned images with respect to each other, based upon the locations of the radiopaque elements of the device in the cleaned images.
For some applications, a stent is deployed within a lumen, and a catheter and/or a balloon carrying radiopaque markers remains within the luminal section in which the stent is deployed. A series of image frames are cleaned in accordance with the techniques described herein, and the cleaned image frames are used to create an enhanced image stream of an angiographic sequence, in which the stent appears more visible than in a native angiogram of the stent. Typically, the enhanced image stream is generated in accordance with techniques described herein, in combination with techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/650,605 to Cohen (published as US 2010/0172556), which is incorporated herein by reference. The enhanced image stream is typically displayed on display 16. For some applications, a plurality of cleaned images are generated, the cleaned images corresponding to respective input images. An enhanced image frame is generated by aligning the input images with each other based upon locations of the radiopaque portions of the device in the corresponding cleaned images, and generating an averaged image frame based upon the aligned input images. Alternatively or additionally, a cleaned, enhanced image frame is generated, by aligning the cleaned images with each other, based upon locations of the radiopaque portions of the device in the cleaned images, and generating an averaged image frame based upon the aligned cleaned images.
For some applications, a series of cleaned image frames are used to create an image stream that is both stabilized and enhanced. Typically, the stabilized, enhanced image stream of the angiographic sequence is generated in accordance with techniques described herein, in combination with techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/650,605 to Cohen (published as US 2010/0172556) and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/075,244 to Tolkowsky (published as US 2008/0221442), both of which applications are incorporated herein by reference. The stabilized, enhanced image stream is typically displayed on display 16.
For some applications, a series of input image frames are divided by the respective corresponding background images such as to produce cleaned image frames. The cleaned image frames are used to create an image stream that is stabilized, enhanced and cleaned, by stabilizing and enhancing the cleaned image frames. In an embodiment, such an image stream is produced in accordance with techniques described herein, in combination with techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/650,605 to Cohen (published as US 2010/0172556) and/or in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/075,244 to Tolkowsky (published as US 2008/0221442), both of which applications are incorporated herein by reference. The stabilized, enhanced, cleaned image stream is typically displayed on display 16.
For some applications, the visibility of the radiopaque markers on an endoluminal device is increased in an image stream, by cleaning image frames belonging to the image stream, in accordance with the techniques described herein. The increased visibility of the markers is used to facilitate tracking the device comprising those markers, typically automatically and typically on line. Typically, the tracking is performed in accordance with techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/650,605 to Cohen (published as US 2010/0172556), which is incorporated herein by reference. For some applications, the endoluminal device comprising the radiopaque markers is an endoluminal data-acquisition device (e.g., an endoluminal imaging probe), and the increased visibility of the radiopaque markers in the resulting image stream is utilized for co-registering, typically automatically and typically on line, endoluminal data points (e.g., endoluminal images) with the extraluminal images (e.g., extraluminal x-ray images). The endoluminal imaging probe may be ultrasound, optical coherence, infrared, MRI, or any combination thereof. Typically, the co-registration is performed in accordance with techniques described in International Patent Application PCT/IL2011/000612 (published as WO 12/014,212), which is incorporated herein by reference.
For example, based upon locations of radiopaque portions of an endoluminal data-acquisition device in the cleaned image the output-generation functionality of the processor may determine that a given one of the endoluminal data points corresponds to a given location within the lumen, and an output may be generated in response thereto. Alternatively or additionally, based upon locations of the radiopaque portions of an endoluminal device in the cleaned image, the output-generation functionality may determine that the endoluminal device is at a given location within the lumen. In response to determining that the endoluminal device is at the given location within the lumen, the output-generation functionality may drive the display to display an endoluminal image of the lumen corresponding to the location.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof that are not in the prior art, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.
The present application is a U.S. national phase of PCT Application no. PCT/IL2012/000246 to Barzelay (published as WO 12/176191), filed Jun. 21, 2012, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/457,866 to Barzelay, filed Jun. 23, 2011. The present application is related to International Patent Application PCT/IL2011/000612 (published as WO 12/014,212), entitled “Co-use of endoluminal data and extraluminal imaging,” filed Jul. 28, 2011, which: (a) claims the benefit of: U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/344,464, entitled “Co-use of endoluminal data and extraluminal imaging,” filed 29 Jul. 2010; U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/344,875, entitled “Co-use of endoluminal data and extraluminal imaging,” filed 1 Nov. 2010; U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/457,339, entitled “Co-use of endoluminal data and extraluminal imaging,” filed 3 Mar. 2011; U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/457,455, entitled “Co-use of endoluminal data and extraluminal imaging,” filed 1 Apr. 2011; U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/457,780, entitled “Co-use of endoluminal data and extraluminal imaging,” filed 2 Jun. 2011; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/457,951, entitled “Co-use of endoluminal data and extraluminal imaging,” filed 15 Jul. 2011; and (b) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/650,605 to Cohen (published as US 2010/0172556), filed Dec. 31, 2009, which: (i) is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/666,879 to Steinberg (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,781,193), which is the US national phase of PCT Application No. PCT/IL2009/001089 to Cohen (published as WO 10/058,398), filed Nov. 18, 2009, which claims priority from the following patent applications: U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/193,329, entitled “Apparatuses and methods for the automatic generation of a road map from angiographic images of a cyclically-moving organ,” to Steinberg, filed Nov. 18, 2008U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/193,915, entitled “Image processing and tool actuation for medical procedures,” to Steinberg, filed Jan. 8, 2009U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/202,181, entitled “Image processing and tool actuation for medical procedures,” to Steinberg, filed Feb. 4, 2009U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/202,451, entitled “Image processing and tool actuation for medical procedures,” to Steinberg, filed Mar. 2, 2009U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/213,216, entitled “Image processing and tool actuation for medical procedures,” to Steinberg, filed May 18, 2009U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/213,534, entitled “Image Processing and Tool Actuation for Medical Procedures,” to Steinberg, filed Jun. 17, 2009U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/272,210, entitled “Image processing and tool actuation for medical procedures,” to Steinberg, filed Sep. 1, 2009 andU.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/272,356, entitled “Image Processing and Tool Actuation for Medical Procedures” to Steinberg, filed Sep. 16, 2009; and (ii) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/075,244 to Tolkowsky (published as US 2008/0221442, now abandoned), filed Mar. 10, 2008, entitled “Imaging for use with moving organs,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos.: 60/906,091 filed on Mar. 8, 2007,60/924,609 filed on May 22, 2007,60/929,165 filed on Jun. 15, 2007,60/935,914 filed on Sep. 6, 2007, and60/996,746 filed on Dec. 4, 2007,all entitled “Apparatuses and methods for performing medical procedures on cyclically-moving body organs.” The present application is related to the following patent applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/075,214 to Iddan (published as 2008/0221439, now abandoned), filed Mar. 10, 2008, entitled “Tools for use with moving organs.”U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/075,252 to Iddan (published as US 2008/0221440), filed Mar. 10, 2008, entitled “Imaging and tools for use with moving organs.”U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/781,260 to Blank (published as US 2010/0228076), filed May 17, 2010, entitled “Controlled actuation and deployment of a medical device.”U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/487,315 to Iddan (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,700,130), filed Jun. 18, 2009, entitled “Stepwise advancement of a medical tool,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/129,331 to Iddan, filed on Jun. 19, 2008, entitled “Stepwise advancement of a medical tool.” All of the above-mentioned applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL2012/000246 | 6/21/2012 | WO | 00 | 2/7/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/176191 | 12/27/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3871360 | Van Horn et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3954098 | Dick et al. | May 1976 | A |
4016871 | Schiff | Apr 1977 | A |
4031884 | Henzel | Jun 1977 | A |
4245647 | Randall | Jan 1981 | A |
4270143 | Morris | May 1981 | A |
4316218 | Gay | Feb 1982 | A |
4382184 | Wernikoff | May 1983 | A |
4545390 | Leary | Oct 1985 | A |
4709385 | Pfeiler | Nov 1987 | A |
4712560 | Schaefer et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4723938 | Goodin et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4741328 | Gabbay | May 1988 | A |
4758223 | Rydell | Jul 1988 | A |
4770184 | Greene, Jr. et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4849906 | Chodos et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4865043 | Shimoni | Sep 1989 | A |
4878115 | Elion | Oct 1989 | A |
4920413 | Nakamura | Apr 1990 | A |
4991589 | Hongo et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994965 | Crawford et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5020516 | Biondi | Jun 1991 | A |
5054045 | Whiting et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5054492 | Scribner | Oct 1991 | A |
5056524 | Oe | Oct 1991 | A |
5062056 | Lo et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5150292 | Hoffmann et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176619 | Segalowitz | Jan 1993 | A |
5177796 | Feig et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5293574 | Roehm et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295486 | Wollschlager et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5330496 | Alferness | Jul 1994 | A |
5357550 | Asahina et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5429144 | Wilk | Jul 1995 | A |
5457728 | Whiting et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457754 | Han et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5486192 | Walinsky et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5537490 | Yukawa | Jul 1996 | A |
5538494 | Matsuda | Jul 1996 | A |
5577502 | Darrow et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586201 | Whiting et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596990 | Yock | Jan 1997 | A |
5613492 | Feinberg | Mar 1997 | A |
5619995 | Lobodzinski | Apr 1997 | A |
5630414 | Horbaschek | May 1997 | A |
5674217 | Wahlstrom et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5724977 | Yock | Mar 1998 | A |
5764723 | Weinberger | Jun 1998 | A |
5766208 | McEwan | Jun 1998 | A |
5792157 | Mische et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807327 | Green et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809105 | Roehm et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822391 | Whiting et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830222 | Makower | Nov 1998 | A |
5879305 | Yock | Mar 1999 | A |
5885218 | Teo | Mar 1999 | A |
5885244 | Leone et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5916194 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5921934 | Teo | Jul 1999 | A |
5971976 | Wang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6088488 | Hardy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095976 | Nachtomy | Aug 2000 | A |
6120455 | Teo | Sep 2000 | A |
6120523 | Crocker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126608 | Kemme et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148095 | Prause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152878 | Nachtomy | Nov 2000 | A |
6195445 | Dubuisson-Jolly et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233478 | Liu | May 2001 | B1 |
6246898 | Vesely et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254541 | Teo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267727 | Teo | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278767 | Hsieh | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6370417 | Horbaschek et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377011 | Ben-Ur | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6442415 | Bis et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454715 | Teo | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6454776 | Tajima et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473635 | Rasche | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491636 | Chenal | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6493575 | Kesten et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496716 | Langer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6532380 | Close et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538634 | Chui et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546271 | Reisfeld | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6576007 | Dehdashtian et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6589176 | Jago | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616596 | Milbocker | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643533 | Knoplioch | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6659953 | Sumanaweera et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6666863 | Wentzel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6704593 | Stainsby | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708052 | Mao et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711436 | Duhaylongsod | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718055 | Suri | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726675 | Beyar | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728566 | Subramanyan | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731973 | Voith | May 2004 | B2 |
6786896 | Madhani et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6788827 | Makram-Ebeid | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6796972 | Sinofsky et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6835177 | Fritz et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6858003 | Evans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6912471 | Heigl | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6937696 | Mostafavi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6959266 | Mostafavi | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6973202 | Mostafavi | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980675 | Evron et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6996430 | Gilboa et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6999852 | Green | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7031504 | Argiro et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7070555 | Siess | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085342 | Younis et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7134994 | Alpert | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7155046 | Aben et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155315 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7180976 | Wink et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191100 | Mostafavi | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7209779 | Kaufman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215802 | Klingensmith | May 2007 | B2 |
7221973 | Nitz | May 2007 | B2 |
7269457 | Shafer | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7289652 | Florent et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7321677 | Evron et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7339585 | Verstraelen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343032 | Oakley et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343195 | Strommer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359554 | Klingensmith | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369691 | Kondo et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7397935 | Kimmel | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7398116 | Edwards | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7517318 | Altmann | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7546154 | Hornegger et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7587074 | Zarkh et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599730 | Hunter | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7604601 | Altmann | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7650179 | Redel et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653426 | Yatsuo et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668362 | Olson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693349 | Gering | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697974 | Jenkins | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713210 | Byrd | May 2010 | B2 |
7729743 | Sabczynski et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7729746 | Redel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740584 | Donaldson | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742629 | Zarkh et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7773787 | Tek et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7773792 | Kimmel | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778488 | Nord | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778688 | Strommer | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7822291 | Guetter | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831076 | Altmann | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844126 | Mory et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848553 | Hertel | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7877132 | Rongen | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7889905 | Higgins et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892177 | Rold et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914442 | Gazdzinski | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7916912 | Abramov et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925064 | Cloutier et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7925069 | Ortyn et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7925327 | Weese | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927275 | Kuban | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930014 | Huennekens et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7935055 | Burckhardt | May 2011 | B2 |
7961926 | Viswanathan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7965905 | Allon et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970187 | Puts | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7978916 | Klingensmith | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992100 | Lundstrom | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8025622 | Rold et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8029447 | Kanz | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052605 | Muller | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055327 | Strommer et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8077939 | Le Bezet et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8080474 | Chen | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086000 | Weijers | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8126241 | Zarkh et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155411 | Hof | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8157742 | Taylor | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165361 | Li | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8172763 | Nelson | May 2012 | B2 |
8189886 | Huo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199981 | Koptenko et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200040 | Pfister | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208995 | Tearney et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8213676 | Bendall | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8233718 | Klingensmith | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8260395 | Markowitz et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271068 | Khamene | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275201 | Rangwala et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8289284 | Glynn | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295577 | Zarkh et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8298147 | Huennekens et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8303503 | Nair | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8364242 | Li | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8396276 | Gatta | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8396533 | Barbu et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409098 | Olson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8411927 | Chang et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8428318 | Zhuo | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8428691 | Byrd | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433115 | Chen | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8457374 | Lendl | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478387 | Xu | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8483488 | Richter | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515146 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8565859 | Wang et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8605976 | Diamant et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8625865 | Zarkh et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8700128 | Assis et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8731642 | Zarkh et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8861830 | Brada et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20010031919 | Strommer et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010055418 | Nakamura | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020049375 | Strommer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058869 | Axelsson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020090119 | Saito et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020114497 | Wetzel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020188307 | Pintor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193686 | Gilboa | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014100 | Maria Meens et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018251 | Solomon | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021381 | Koppe et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023141 | Stelzer et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069499 | Lienard et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088179 | Seeley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095710 | Tessadro | May 2003 | A1 |
20030139772 | Fisher et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157073 | Peritt | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040034380 | Woolfson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040077941 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097805 | Verard et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133129 | Harari et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165756 | Mielekamp | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176681 | Mao et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215235 | Jackson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249270 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254570 | Hadjicostis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267113 | Thomson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004503 | Samson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008210 | Evron et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015009 | Mourad et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031176 | Hertel | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033199 | van der Steen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043614 | Huizenga et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054916 | Mostafavi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067568 | Harding et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080336 | Byrd et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090737 | Burrel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096589 | Shachar | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107688 | Strommer | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107808 | Evans et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111719 | Pesatore et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113685 | Maschke et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137661 | Sra | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141766 | Nagahashi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143777 | Sra | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154281 | Xue et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182295 | Soper et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197557 | Strommer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197559 | Boese et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197566 | Strommer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201510 | Mostafavi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228359 | Doyle | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234331 | Sendai | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050273050 | Yokoyama et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288577 | Weese | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007188 | Reiner | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058647 | Strommer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074285 | Zarkh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106318 | Davidson | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120581 | Eck et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129142 | Reynolds | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147897 | Grinvald | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149134 | Soper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155327 | Briganti et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159318 | Alyassin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165270 | Borgert et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173287 | Sabczynski et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184016 | Glossop | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188135 | Zarkh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193505 | Glukhovsky et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224188 | Libbus et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224232 | Chobotov | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241369 | Lienard et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241445 | Altmann | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241465 | Huennekens et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241478 | Lewis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253024 | Altmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253029 | Altmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253031 | Altmann | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060257006 | Bredno et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259137 | Artof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269108 | Viswanathan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287595 | Maschke | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021816 | Rudin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038061 | Huennekens et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038081 | Eck et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043292 | Camus | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053558 | Puts et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055128 | Glossop | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060798 | Krupnik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088431 | Bourang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106146 | Altmann et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116342 | Zarkh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123771 | Redel et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142907 | Moaddeb et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147706 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165916 | Cloutier et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173861 | Strommer | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070208388 | Jahns | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219630 | Chu | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232896 | Gilboa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248253 | Manzke et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255139 | Deschinger | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269135 | Ono | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276216 | Beyar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080008366 | Desh | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015677 | Glossop et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021331 | Grinvald | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080082049 | Evans et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089566 | Node-Langlois | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114238 | Lloyd | May 2008 | A1 |
20080118117 | Gauldie et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119922 | Alkhatib | May 2008 | A1 |
20080137923 | Spahn | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137935 | Spahn | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146923 | Mejia | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146942 | Dala-Krishna | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177183 | Courtney | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188739 | Rongen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080221439 | Iddan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221440 | Iddan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221442 | Tolkowsky et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247621 | Zarkh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253686 | Bayer | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262346 | Assis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267475 | Lendl | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080283771 | Li | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300487 | Govari | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090016587 | Strobel et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090074284 | Zeineh et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093676 | Davidson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103682 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105579 | Garibaldi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116715 | Bredno et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171201 | Olson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177444 | Wiemker et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090216112 | Assis et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090245601 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257631 | Baumgart | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264752 | Markowitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264753 | Von Schulthess | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275831 | Hall | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281418 | Ruijters et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299195 | Muller et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304593 | Frinking et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306547 | Iddan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041949 | Tolkowsky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049034 | Eck et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054573 | Shekhara | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100067768 | Ionasec et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094124 | Schoonenberg et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094127 | Xu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100099979 | Schoonenberg et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111396 | Boucheron | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114289 | Camus | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123715 | Hansegard | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134517 | Saikaly et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100135546 | Cziria | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157041 | Klaiman et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160764 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160773 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161022 | Tolkowsky | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161023 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171819 | Tolkowsky et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172556 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174192 | Azuma | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191102 | Steinberg et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198063 | Huber | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220917 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222671 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228076 | Blank et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246910 | Wiemker | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272340 | Bar-Aviv et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100290693 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100310140 | Schneider | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312100 | Zarkh et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318115 | Chanduszko et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331670 | Strommer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015520 | Meetz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110026786 | Mohamed | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033094 | Zarkh | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110034801 | Baumgart | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052030 | Bruder et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071404 | Schmidtt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075912 | Rieber et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087104 | Moore | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112398 | Zarkh et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118825 | Hunter et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110157154 | Bernard et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110228992 | Wels et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230758 | Eichler | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235889 | Spahn | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110286627 | Takacs et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293163 | Kargar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319752 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120004529 | Tolkowsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120004533 | Peng | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120004537 | Tolkowsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014574 | Ferschel et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029339 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051606 | Saikia | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059220 | Holsing | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059253 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065507 | Brunke | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069167 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072190 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120083696 | Kitamura | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120093379 | Florent et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123238 | Vaillant et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130242 | Burgess | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140998 | Zhu | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120207367 | Kneepkens | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215093 | Ji | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224751 | Kemp | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120230565 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245460 | Slomka | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250974 | Miyamoto | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120294498 | Popovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300981 | Yeh et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310081 | Adler et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130004044 | Ross | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030295 | Huennekens | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046167 | Shah | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053664 | Jian et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130109958 | Baumgart | May 2013 | A1 |
20130109959 | Baumgart | May 2013 | A1 |
20130116739 | Brada et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120296 | Merritt | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120297 | Merrit | May 2013 | A1 |
20130123616 | Merrit | May 2013 | A1 |
20130308844 | Florent et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130329030 | Tolkowsky et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329977 | Tolkowsky et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140094660 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094689 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094690 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094691 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094692 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140094693 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100451 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140107479 | Klaiman et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140111541 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140112566 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114184 | Klaiman et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114185 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114308 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114333 | Tolkowsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121513 | Tolkowsky et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150282737 | Tolkowsky et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150282889 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150282890 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150283319 | Tolkowsky et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 570 079 | Mar 2013 | EP |
9410904 | May 1994 | WO |
9907354 | Feb 1999 | WO |
0033755 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0110313 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0143642 | Jun 2001 | WO |
03043516 | May 2003 | WO |
03096894 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2005026891 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005051452 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005124689 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006027781 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006066122 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006066124 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006076409 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006114721 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2006121984 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007002685 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007014028 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007015199 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2008007350 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008062358 | May 2008 | WO |
2008107905 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009153794 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010058398 | May 2010 | WO |
2011046903 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011046904 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011128797 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011145094 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2012014212 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012028190 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012095755 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012107857 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012138872 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012138874 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012176191 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013025602 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013061225 | May 2013 | WO |
2013084345 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013128233 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013169814 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013175472 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014002095 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2015155770 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Communication dated Sep. 5, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,289. |
Communication dated Oct. 24, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,121. |
Communication dated Aug. 29, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,140. |
Communication dated Nov. 7, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 14/096,968. |
Communication dated Sep. 5, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,430. |
Communication dated Sep. 11, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,152. |
Communication dated Oct. 15, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,366. |
Communication dated Oct. 8, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,093. |
Communication dated Oct. 14, 2014 from the USPTO in U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,252. |
Boyle et al., entitled “Assessment of a Novel Angiographic Image Stabilization System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention” (Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 20 No. 2, 2007. |
Timinger et al., entitled “Motion compensated coronary interventional navigation by means of diaphragm tracking and elastic motion models” (Phys Med Biol. Feb. 7, 2005;50(3):491-503. |
Timinger et al., entitled “Motion compensation for interventional navigation on 3D static roadmaps based on an affine model and gating” (Phys Med Biol. Mar. 7, 2004;49(5):719-32. |
Turski et al., entitled “Digital Subtraction Angiography ‘Road Map’” (American Journal of Roentgenology, 1982. |
Iddan et al., entitled “3D imaging in the studio and elsewhere” (SPIE Proceedings vol. 4298, 2001. |
“Catheter Insertion Simulation with Combined Visual and Haptic Feedback,” by Zorcolo et al. (Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia). |
“4D-CT imaging of a volume influenced by respiratory motion on multi-slice CT Tinsu Pan,” by Lee et al., (Medical Physics, Feb. 2004, vol. 31, Issue 2, pp. 333-340)—an abstract. |
“New 4-D imaging for real-time intraoperative MRI: adaptive 4-D scan,” by Tokuda et al. (Med Image Comput Assist Intent Int Conf. 2006;9(Pt 1):454-61) an abstract. |
“Real-time interactive viewing of 4D kinematic MR joint studies,” by Schulz et al. (Med Image Comput Assist Intent Int Conf. 2005;8(Pt 1):467-73.)—an abstract. |
“4D smoothing of gated SPECT images using a left-ventricle shape model and a deformable mesh,” by Brankov et al., (Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2004 IEEE, Oct. 2004, vol. 5, 2845-2848). |
“Prospective motion correction of X-ray images for coronary interventions,” by Shechter et al. (IEEE Trans Med Imaging. Apr. 2005;24(4):441-50). |
“Cardiac Imaging: We Got the Beat!” by Elizabeth Morgan (Medical Imaging, Mar. 2005). |
“Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by Retrospectively ECG-Gated Multislice Spiral CT,” by Achenbach et al., (Circulation. Dec. 5, 2000;102(23):2823-8). |
“Spatially-adaptive temporal smoothing for reconstruction of dynamic and gated image sequences,” by Brankov et al., (Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2000 IEEE, 2000, vol. 2, 15/146-15/150)—an abstract. |
“Full-scale clinical implementation of a video based respiratory gating system,” by Ramsey et al., (Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2000. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2000, vol. 3, 2141-2144)—an abstract. |
“Three-Dimensional Respiratory-Gated MR Angiography of the Coronary Arteries: Comparison with Conventional Coronary Angiography,” by Post et al., (AJR, 1996; 166: 1399-1404). |
Soffie Mansson, et al., “Dosimetric verification of breathing adapted radiotherapy using polymer gel”, Journal of Physics: Conference series 56 (200) 300-303. |
“From 2D to 4D” AXIOM Innovations— Mar. 2008, www.siemens.com/healthcare-magazine. |
A Brochure: Impella® 2.5, Percutaneous Circulatory Support System, ABIOMED™, 2007. |
Frangi et al., entitled “Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering” (Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 1998—Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1496, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 130-137). |
Dijkstra, entitled “A Note on Two Problems in Connexion with Graphs” (Numerische Mathematik I, 269-271, 1959). |
Zarkh et al., entitled “Guide wire navigation and therapeutic device localization for catheterization procedure” (International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 311-316. |
Brochure: At the Transvascular Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) conference held in Washington DC, USA in Oct. 2008, Paieon Inc. demonstrated the CardiOp-THV system for real-time navigation and positioning of a trans-catheter heart valve. |
Brochure: At the TCT conference held in San Francisco, USA in Sep. 2009, Paieon Inc. demonstrated the IC-PRO Comprehensive Imaging Workstation for providing assistance in cardiac catheterization procedures. |
An International Search Report dated Sep. 8, 2009, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL09/00610. |
An International Search Report dated Jan. 15, 2009, issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IL08/000316. |
An International Search Report dated May 19 2010 issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IL2009/001089. |
“A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration,” by Chui (Computer Vision and Image Understanding 89 (2003) 114-141). |
“Advanced and Challenges in Super-Resolution,” by Farsiu (International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 47-57, Special issue on high-resolution image reconstruction, Aug. 2004). |
“Image Registration by Minimization of Residual Complexity,” by Myronenko (CVPR 2009). |
“Image inpainting,” by Bertalmio (ACM Siggraph 2000, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, Jul. 2000). |
“Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images,” by Rueckert, (IEEE Trans. Med. Img, vol. 18, No. 8, 1999). |
“Unwarping of unidirectionally distorted EPI images,” by Kybic (IEEE Trans. Med. Img., vol. 19, No. 2, 2000). |
“Geometrically Correct 3-D Reconstruction of Intravascular Ultrasound Images by Fusion with Biplane Angiography—Methods and Validation,” Andreas Wahle, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Final Manuscript #187/98, June 30, 1999. |
An International Search Report dated Jan. 6, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT Application No. PCT/IL11/00391. |
An Official Action dated Nov. 28, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,252. |
An Official Action dated Dec. 8, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,244. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/845,347 to Strommer et al., filed Sep. 2006. |
International Search Report dated Mar. 2, 2012, issued in PCT/IL11/00612. |
Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,214. |
Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,944. |
Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,152. |
Office Action dated May 22, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,244. |
Umeda, H. et al., “Promising efficacy of primary gradual and prolonged balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries: A randomized comparison with cutting balloon angioplasty and conventional balloon angioplasty”, 2004. |
W. Santamore et al., “A microcomputer based automated quantative coronary angiographic analysis system,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 16, pp. 367-377, 1988. |
V. Duddalwar, “Multislice CT angiography: a practical guide to CT angiography in vascular imaging and intervention,” the British Journal of Radiology, 77 (2004), S27-S38. |
Official Action dated Oct. 23, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of JP Application No. 2009-552328. |
Official Action dated Nov. 23, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,944. |
Official Action dated Aug. 27, 2012, which issued during the prosecution U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,214. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 10 2012 , which issued during the prosecution of PCT/IL2012/000246. |
Communication dated Sep. 5, 2012 , which issued during the prosecution of EP Application 09 766 329.8-1526. |
Communication dated Oct. 29, 2012 , which issued during the prosecution of EP Application 08 719941.0-1265/2129284. |
Computer translation of JP 2010-253017 to Takeshi. |
G. Mancini et al., “Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method,” Circulation 1987;75:452-460. |
I. Kompatsiaris et al., “Deformable Boundary Detection of Stents in Angiographic Images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, No. 6, June 2000. |
L. Yaneza et al., “ Atherosclerotic Plaque Can Be Quantified Using Multifractal and Wavelet Decomposition Techniques,” Abstracts—Angiography & Interventional Cardiology, JACC Mar. 3, 2004. |
Official Action dated Oct. 31, 2012, which issued during the prosecution U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,244. |
Official Action dated Sep. 20, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,955. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/359,431. |
W. Goodman et al., “Coronary-Artery Calcification in Young Adults With End-Stage Renal Disease Who Are Undergoing Dialysis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 342 No. 20. |
W. Leung et al., “Coronary Artery Quantitation and Data Management System for Paired Cineangiograms,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 24:121-134 (1991). |
A search report dated Nov. 23, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's EP Application 09 827264.4-1265/2358269. |
An examination report dated Dec. 5, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's EP Application 09766329.8. |
An Official Action dated Dec. 10, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,156. |
An Official Action dated Dec. 11, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,152. |
An Official Action dated Jan. 22, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,121. |
An Official Action dated Jan. 28, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,366. |
An Official Action dated Feb. 4, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,185. |
Peng Wang et al.: “Image-Based Device Tracking for the Co-registration of Angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound Images”, MICCAI 2011, Part I, LINCS 6891, pp. 161-168, 2011. |
An Official Action dated Jul. 2, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,244. |
An Official Action dated Jun. 19, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,214. |
An Official Action dated May 31, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,252. |
An Official Action dated May 6, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/487,315. |
A Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 4, 2013, which issued in Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,960. |
An Official Action dated Sep. 6, 2013 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,605. |
An Official Action dated Aug. 30, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,121. |
An Official Action dated Sep. 12, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,260. |
A Notice of Allowance in Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,414. |
An Official Action dated Aug. 3, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,294. |
An Official Action dated Jun. 19, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,252. |
An Official Action dated Jun. 18, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,366. |
An Official Action dated Jun. 7, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,156. |
An Official Action dated May 29, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,121. |
Buddy D. Ratner, “Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine”, Elsevier, chapter 7, 1996. |
Gerald E. Miller, “Fundamentals of Biomedical Transport Processes, Morgan & Claypool Publishers”, chapter 2, 2010. |
Gerhard Albert ten Brinke, “Automated coronary flow reserve assessment using planar x-ray angiography”, PhD dissertation, Universiteit Twente, 2011. |
Jerry T. Wong et al., “Quantification of fractional flow reserve based on angiographic image data”, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:13-22, Jan. 7, 2011. |
Kassab, G. S. et al., “Cross-sectional area and vol. compliance of porcine left coronary arteries,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 281, H623-H628, Aug. 2011. |
Molloi S. et al., “Absolute volumetric coronary blood flow measurement with digital subtraction angiography”. Int J Card Imaging 14:137-145, 1998. |
Molloi, S. et al., “Estimation of coronary artery hyperemic blood flow based on arterial lumen volume using angiographic images,” The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 28, No. 1, 1-11, Jan. 7, 2011. |
Molloi, S. et al., “Quantification of coronary artery lumen volume by digital angiography: in vivo validation,” Circulation 104, 2351-2357, Nov. 6, 2001. |
Molloi, S. et al., “Quantification of volumetric coronary blood flow with dual-energy digital subtraction angiography,” Circulation 93, 1919-1927, May 15, 1996. |
Molloi, S. et al., “Regional volumetric coronary blood flow measurement by digital angiography: in vivo validation,” Acad. Radiol. 11, 7, 757-766, Jul. 2004. |
Sian Sen et al., “Development and Validation of a New, Adenosine-Independent Index of Stenosis Severity From Coronary Wave-Intensity Analysis”. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, Apr. 10, 2012. |
Yunlong Huo et al., “A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve,” J. R. Soc. Interface, Nov. 23, 2011. |
A Notice of Allowance issued in Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,893. |
An Official Action dated Nov. 13, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/666,879. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 2, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,211. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 21, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,214. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 23, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,913. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 25, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,366. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 3, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,185. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 30, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,335. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 4, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,955. |
Correspondence from the International Searching Authority in Applicant's PCT/IL13/50549. |
Correspondence from the International Searching Authority in Applicant's PCT/IL2013/050438. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application PCT/IL2013/050438 mailed Dec. 2, 2013. |
Office Action, dated Jan. 7, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,244. |
Office Action, dated Feb. 12, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,260. |
Office Action, dated Dec. 31, 2013, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,252. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 3, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 13/965,872. |
Search Report, dated Jan. 22, 2014, issued by the International Searching Authority, in counterpart Application No. PCT/IL13/50549. |
Written Opinion, dated Jan. 22, 2014, issued by the International Searching Authority, in counterpart Application No. PCT/IL13/50549. |
An Official Action dated Feb. 20, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,214. |
An Official Action dated May 6, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,252. |
A Notice of Allowance issued in Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/666,879. |
An Official Action dated Mar. 21, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,913. |
An Official Action dated Apr. 3, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,955. |
An Official Action dated Mar. 14, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,605. |
An Official Action dated Apr. 25, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,121. |
An Official Action dated Apr. 24, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,366. |
An Official Action dated Apr. 17, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,211. |
An Official Action dated Apr. 28, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,185. |
An Official Action dated May 5, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/096,968. |
An Official Action dated Feb. 14, 2014 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,140. |
Pyxaras et al., “Quantitative angiography optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses” (Medscape), Oct. 2013, 11 pages total. |
Tu et al., “In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered 3D quantitative coronary angiography intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.”, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2012) 28:1315-1327, Jan. 20, 2012, DOI 10.1007/s10554-012-0016-6, 13 pages total. |
Tu et al, “Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT”, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2011) 27:197-207, Jan. 25, 2011, DOI 10.1007/s10554-011-9809-2, 11 pages total. |
Communication dated Mar. 25, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,252. |
Communication dated Apr. 13, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,944. |
Communication dated Apr. 22, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 14/142,082. |
Communication dated Apr. 10, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,913. |
Communication dated Apr. 10, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,152. |
Communication dated Mar. 16, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,211. |
Communication dated Mar. 23, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,922. |
Communication dated Mar. 16, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,185. |
Communication dated Feb. 23, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,184. |
Communication dated May 6, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,260. |
Communication dated May 11, 2015 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in counterpart U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,605. |
Communication dated May 12, 2015 from the Japanese Patent Office in counterpart application No. 521284/2013. |
A Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 24, 2014, issued in Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,603. |
An Official Action dated Jul. 3, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,913. |
An Official Action dated Jul. 30, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,214. |
An Official Action dated Jul. 31, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,944. |
An Official Action dated Jun. 18, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,244. |
An Official Action dated May 21, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,156. |
An Official Action dated May 29, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,922. |
An Official Action dated May 30, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,335. |
An Official Action dated Jun. 3, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,260. |
Communication dated Dec. 11, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,913. |
Communication dated Feb. 4, 2015, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,955. |
Communication dated Nov. 24, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,260. |
Communication dated Jan. 6, 2015, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,605. |
Communication dated Feb. 6, 2015, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,121. |
Communication dated Nov. 24, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,944. |
Communication dated Feb. 6, 2015, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,366. |
Communication dated Jan. 16, 2015, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,229. |
Communication dated Jan. 6, 2015, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,335. |
Communication dated Nov. 28, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,922. |
Communication dated Dec. 4, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,114. |
Communication dated Nov. 24, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,156. |
Communication dated Dec. 19, 2014, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,430. |
Communication dated Jan. 12, 2015, issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,289. |
Communication dated Jan. 23, 2015, issued by the European Patent Office in counterpart Application No. 12802046.8. |
An Official Action dated Aug. 17, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,913. |
An Official Action dated Aug. 27, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,121. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 22, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,944. |
An Official Action dated Sep. 11, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,260. |
An Official Action dated Sep. 21, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,229. |
An Official Action dated Sep. 3, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,211. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 7, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,185. |
An Official Action dated Aug. 11, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,335. |
An Official Action dated Aug. 12, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/097,922. |
An Official Action dated Oct. 7, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/142,082. |
An Official Action dated Aug. 25, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,184. |
An Official Action dated Sep. 23, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/742,996. |
A European Patent report dated Sep. 8, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European Patent Application No. 08719941.0. |
An Official Action dated Sep. 4, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's Canadian Application No. 2,874,415. |
An International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2015, which issued during prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2015/050372. |
An Official Action dated Jul. 28, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,252. |
An Official Action dated Jul. 6, 2015 , which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 12/649,955. |
An Official Action dated May 19, 2015 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/228,229. |
An Official Action dated May 21, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,140. |
An Official Action dated May 21, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's Canadian Application No. 2,874,415. |
An Official Action dated Jul. 2, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's Canadian Application No. 2,875,346. |
An English-translation of an Official Action dated Jun. 23, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's JP Application No. 2014-164417. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140140597 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61457866 | Jun 2011 | US |