This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 7,911,407 issued Mar. 22, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 7,830,310 issued Nov. 9, 2010, and PCT/US2012/032648 filed Apr. 6, 2012, which are incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
None
This disclosure relates to tensor impedance surfaces, and in particular to anisotropic tensor impedance surfaces.
Prior art tensor impedance surfaces using printed-circuit are described in References 1, 2 and 12 below, which are incorporated herein by reference. The impedance surfaces described in those references rely on metal patterns on the printed circuit to provide impedance variation and anisotropy. Such an impedance surface has a number of disadvantages including etching variations, which affect impedance, and limitations on the range of impedance that can be achieved. For example, the ratio of the smallest to the largest impedance may be limited.
Tunable surfaces with varactors are described in Reference 7 below, which is incorporated herein by reference. These tunable surfaces have the disadvantages of cost and complexity because of the required tuning elements, bias lines, and other circuit complexities.
Tensor transmission line metamaterials, as described in Reference 10 below, which is incorporated herein by reference, have the disadvantage that they only apply to transmission line modes. Tensor transmission line metamaterials do not work for or apply to surface waves which have many real-world applications. Transmission line metamaterials may use lumped elements to realize values of epsilon and mu. For example, Reference 10 describes a circuit model that has a shunt element to ground.
Sinusoidally modulated impedance surfaces as described in References 1, 3, 5, and 11 below, which are incorporated herein by reference, have been used to control surface waves in a manner to achieve directive radiation; however, they do not operate well to control polarization.
The following references are incorporated by reference as though set forth in full.
What is needed is a tensor impedance surface and a method of making a tensor impedance surface capable of achieving a wide range of impedance values and anisotropy to provide phase direction control, power direction control, and polarization control. The embodiments of the present disclosure answer these and other needs.
In a first embodiment disclosed herein, a tensor impedance surface comprises a plurality of unit cells, wherein each unit cell comprises a dielectric having a thickness, a first surface of the dielectric having a metallic pattern on the first surface, and at least one lumped element coupled between a first point on the metallic pattern and a second point on the metallic pattern, wherein each unit cell of the plurality of unit cells has a first thickness, wherein each unit cell of the plurality of unit cells has an identical metallic pattern, and wherein each unit cell of the plurality of unit cells is adjacent to one or more unit cells of the plurality of the unit cells.
In another embodiment disclosed herein, a method of providing a tensor impedance surface comprises providing a plurality of unit cells, wherein each unit cell comprises a dielectric having a thickness, a first surface of the dielectric having a metallic pattern on the first surface, and at least one lumped element coupled between a first point on the metallic pattern and a second point on the metallic pattern, wherein each unit cell of the plurality of unit cells has a first thickness, wherein each unit cell of the plurality of unit cells has an identical metallic pattern, and wherein each unit cell of the plurality of unit cells is adjacent to one or more unit cells of the plurality of the unit cells.
These and other features and advantages will become further apparent from the detailed description and accompanying figures that follow. In the figures and description, numerals indicate the various features, like numerals referring to like features throughout both the drawings and the description.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to clearly describe various specific embodiments disclosed herein. One skilled in the art, however, will understand that the presently claimed invention may be practiced without all of the specific details discussed below. In other instances, well known features have not been described so as not to obscure the invention.
The present disclosure describes tensor impedance surfaces capable of achieving a wider range of impedance values and greater degrees of anisotropy than the prior art using printed circuit board-based impedance surfaces, such as those described in References 1, 2 and 12 above. The tensor impedance surfaces of the present disclosure allow control of phase direction, power flow direction, and polarization, and may be realized on a dielectric substrate, which may or may not be grounded. The dielectric substrate may be a printed-circuit board. In the present disclosure unit cells are provided and each unit cell has a metallic pattern on the surface. The metallic pattern may be loaded with surface mount lumped elements, such as capacitors, inductors, diodes or resistors. The present disclosure method of loading the metallic pattern with lumped elements provides an inverse design procedure that allows the lumped element values to be directly derived to provide a desired impedance surface. This is in contrast to the prior art, which requires cataloging the behavior of hundreds or thousands of unit cell geometries through simulation, and then selecting unit cells that approximately provide a desired impedance property.
Impedance surfaces have many applications including electrically-scanned antennas, electromagnetic scattering, reflector arrays, and waveguides, as described in References 3 to 9 above, which are incorporated herein by reference. The present disclosure increases design flexibility by relaxing the constraints on realizable impedance surfaces.
While impedance surfaces properties in the prior art have been achieved by patterning metal over a grounded dielectric substrate, the present disclosure describes devices and methods for achieving a wider range of properties beyond those achievable with just metallic patterning. Impedance surfaces formed in accordance with the present disclosure can have larger impedance ranges and greater ranges of anisotropy than previously available in the prior art using just patterned metallic claddings. Further, a circuit model can be used to aids synthesis of the tensor impedance surfaces, which may also be scalar impedance surfaces. Also, the tensor impedance surfaces of the present disclosure avoid the high fabrication cost, complexity, and losses incurred using prior art varactor loaded impedance surfaces. An added advantage is that the present disclosure allows tensor impedance surfaces to be made thinner since capacitance is no longer dependent on only a substrate thickness. Also, although the present disclosure is used to control surface waves rather than guided transmission line modes, devices designed using the present disclosure may resemble a transmission line loaded with lumped elements.
In the prior art, the metallic cladding 16 is modeled as a tensor sheet impedance, as shown in
The table in
Using the circuit model depicted in
The dispersion equation to solve then becomes:
The dispersion equation above can be used to derive the lumped element impedances (Zn) rather than the surface impedances/admittances (Ysheet/Zsheet matrices). Once the lumped impedances Z1, Z2, Z3, and Z4 are found, the appropriate lumped element values, which may be capacitors, inductors, diodes and/or resistors can be found. Advantageously, lumped elements such as capacitors, inductors, and resistors are low cost and are available in a large range of values. However, such lumped elements are generally only available in discrete values, so that factor can also be taken into account.
The above equations are for a 4-branch structure, but a similar model may be derived for a 3-branch structure, or 3 circuit transmission line model, as shown in
which is equivalent to:
The impedance of the circuit elements may be found in terms of the desired surface admittance, as follows.
The plane 24 with lumped elements is modeled as a homogenous sheet impedance using Ysheet or equivalently Zsheet, as shown above.
Lumped element tensor impedance surfaces along with the circuit models aid direct synthesis and provide a complete design flow.
In prior art, achieving two dramatically different dispersion properties requires that the metallic patterns be geometrically different since the inductance and capacitance in the prior art is achieved from the widths of the metallic gaps and traces. In this disclosure, the inductance and capacitance is achieved primary from the lumped elements with the grid providing a negligible contribution.
A 3-branch structure was used to derive the lumped elements for
Having now described the invention in accordance with the requirements of the patent statutes, those skilled in this art will understand how to make changes and modifications to the present invention to meet their specific requirements or conditions. Such changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as disclosed herein.
The foregoing Detailed Description of exemplary and preferred embodiments is presented for purposes of illustration and disclosure in accordance with the requirements of the law. It is not intended to be exhaustive nor to limit the invention to the precise form(s) described, but only to enable others skilled in the art to understand how the invention may be suited for a particular use or implementation. The possibility of modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. No limitation is intended by the description of exemplary embodiments which may have included tolerances, feature dimensions, specific operating conditions, engineering specifications, or the like, and which may vary between implementations or with changes to the state of the art, and no limitation should be implied therefrom. Applicant has made this disclosure with respect to the current state of the art, but also contemplates advancements and that adaptations in the future may take into consideration of those advancements, namely in accordance with the then current state of the art. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims as written and equivalents as applicable. Reference to a claim element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated. Moreover, no element, component, nor method or process step in this disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or step is explicitly recited in the Claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. Sec. 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for . . . ” and no method or process step herein is to be construed under those provisions unless the step, or steps, are expressly recited using the phrase “comprising the step(s) of . . . .”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7813310 | Song | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7830310 | Sievenpiper et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7911407 | Fong et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8976077 | Colburn et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20150009071 | Gregoire | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
B. Fong et al, “Scalar and Tensor Holographic Artificial Impedance Surfaces,” IEEE TAP., vol. 58, No. 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 3212-3221. |
Patel, A.M.; Grbic, A., “Modeling and Analysis of Printed-Circuit Tensor Impedance Surfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, No. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 211-220. |
D. Sievenpiper et al, “Holographic AISs for Conformal Antennas”, 29th Antennas Applications Symposium, 2005, pp. 256-259. |
D. Sievenpiper, J. Colburn, B. Fong, J. Ottusch and J. Visher., 2005 IEEE Antennas and Prop. Symp. Digest, vol. 1B, 2005, pp. 256-259. |
D.J. Gregoire and J.S. Colburn, “Artificial Impedance Surface Antennas”, Proc. Antennas Appl. Symposium 2011, pp. 460-475. |
D.J. Gregoire and J.S. Colburn, “Artificial Impedance Surface Antenna Design and Simulation”, Proc. Antennas Appl. Symposium 2010, pp. 288-303. |
Colburn, J.S.; Lai, A.; Sievenpiper, D.F.; Bekaryan, A.; Fong, B.H.; Ottusch, J.J.; Tulythan, P.; , “Adaptive Artificial Impedance Surface Conformal Antennas,” Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2009. APSURSI '09. IEEE , vol., No., pp. 1-4, Jun. 1-5, 2009. |
Sievenpiper, D.; Schaffner, J.; Lee, J.J.; Livingston, S. “A Steerable Leaky-Wave Antenna Using a Tunable Impedance Ground Plane,” Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE , vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 179-182, 2002. |
D. J. Gregoire and A. V. Kabakian, “Surface-Wave Waveguides,” Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE 10, 2011, pp. 1512-1515. |
G. Gok and A. Grbic, “Tensor Transmission-Line Metamaterials,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 1559-1566, May 2010. |
Patel, A.M.; Grbic, A., “A Printed Leaky-Wave Antenna Based on a Sinusoidally-Modulated Reactance Surface,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, No. 6, Jun. 2011, pp. 2087-2096. |
Quarfoth, R.; Sievenpiper, D., “Broadband Unit—Cell Design for Highly Anisotropic Impedance Surfaces,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, No. 8, Aug. 2014, pp. 4143-4152. |
Luukkonen, O.; Simovski, C.; Granet, G.; Goussetis, G.; Lioubtchenko, D.; Raisanen, A.V.; Tretyakov, S.A., “Simple and Accurate Analytical Model of Planar Grids and High-Impedance Surfaces Comprising Metal Strips or Patches,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, No. 6, Jun. 2008, pp. 1624-1632. |