LYTIC PHAGE WITH HIGH SPECIFICITY TOWARDS PATHOGENIC ESCHERICHIA COLI

Abstract
Herein are presented methods for incorporating a novel bacteriophage, CAM-21, that exhibits lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli, into food, food packaging, films, and quantum dot-based biosensors. The bacteriophage contains no genes associated with toxins, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, lysogeny, or allergens. Methods are provided for encapsulating the bacteriophage with proteins and/or carbohydrate materials to enhance stability. Various films in which the bacteriophage are incorporated, and which similarly exhibit suppression of pathogenic E. coli, are also provided. Additionally, when conjugated with N-doped graphene quantum dots, CAM-21 enables biosensor development for E. coli detection in food products through altered photoluminescence emission spectra, and methods for making and using such biosensors are provided.
Description
SEQUENCE LISTING

This application contains a sequence listing, the contents of the electronic sequence listing (2024-11-18 UMCO-40489U1-17193-197.xml; Size: 166,000 bytes; Date of Creation: Nov. 13, 2024) is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


FIELD

The present teachings relate to detection and control of pathogenic bacteria using bacteriophages, and particularly to incorporation of bacteriophages into food packaging and bacteria detection systems.


BACKGROUND

The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art. The present disclosure relates generally to a novel bacteriophage and methods of preparation thereof, and particularly to the incorporation of a novel bacteriophage that demonstrates lytic effect against Escherichia coli (“E. coli”) into food packaging, films, and quantum dot biosensors.


Foodborne illnesses caused by pathogenic bacteria are a significant public health concern, with E. coli being one of the most prevalent and dangerous bacterial pathogens found in food. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) strains, in particular, can cause severe illness and potentially life-threatening complications. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that E. coli infections cause approximately 97,000 illnesses annually in the United States alone.


Traditional attempts to prevent or mitigate bacterial contamination in food products have largely relied on chemical preservatives, pasteurization, and various packaging technologies. However, these conventional methods have notable draw-backs. Chemical preservatives and heat treatments, for example, can negatively affect a consumer's perception of a food's taste and/or appearance. Considered in the context of the rising popularity of minimally processed foods, the drawbacks of conventional methods engender a need for novel antimicrobial strategies that can ensure food safety while satisfying consumer needs.


One such novel strategy considers the use of bacteriophages, which are viruses that specifically target and eliminate bacteria. Bacteriophages offer several advantages over traditional methods as they can directly target specific bacteria, replicate solely in response to the presence of those bacteria, and otherwise not interfere with the taste and appearance of the food product. However, it has not traditionally been clear how one can maintain bacteriophage viability during food processing and storage, and it has furthermore not been clear how these bacteriophages can then be used as detection systems.


Current food packaging designs have yet to take advantage of the potential of bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents, perhaps due to the multiple competing constraints placed on any candidate bacteriophage: the bacteriophage in question must be stable under transport, processing and storage conditions; the bacteriophage must not be toxic, mutagenic, or otherwise harmful to a consumer; the bacteriophage must be specific to one or more common food-borne pathogens; the bacteriophage must be sufficiently potent as to counteract pathogenic bacteria even at low multiplicities of infection; and the bacteriophage must be amenable to incorporation into pack-aging or other useful complexes.


Furthermore, the rapid and accurate detection of E. coli contamination in food products remains a significant challenge. Traditional detection methods include techniques like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses. Such techniques are time-consuming and require specialized laboratory facilities. Pathogenic bacterial infection of food products, by contrast, can occur very quickly, and thus rapid detection and decision-making is essential for preventing the distribution of contaminated products. Additionally, many existing biosensor technologies suffer from limitations in sensitivity, specificity, or ease of use, and are difficult to integrate into food supply chains and storage systems.


Therefore, there is pressing need for novel approaches that can address multiple aspects of pathogenic bacteria control and detection in food products.


SUMMARY

In various embodiments, the present disclosure discusses methods of making and using bacteriophages for antimicrobial control of E. coli. The present disclosure also discusses the make and use of films incorporating bacteriophages, principally as food packaging materials, as well as the make and use of quantum dots conjugated with bacteriophages for the detection of target bacteria.


In various forms, described herein is a bacteriophage with an inhibitory effect on E. coli. In various forms, the bacteriophage is a bacteriophage called CAM-21, deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant that has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli. In various forms, the bacteriophage has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli even at a multiplicity of infection value of 0.001. In various forms, a latent period for the bacteriophage is approximately 20 minutes. In various forms, the bacteriophage has a burst size of approximately 69 plaque forming units (PFU) per infected cell. In various forms, the bacteriophage has a genome that comprises no genes known to be associated with known toxins, virulence factors, antibiotic resistances, lysogeny, or allergens. In various forms, the bacteriophage is in the Myoviridae family. In various forms, the bacteriophage is a species in the Tequatrovirus genus. In some forms, the bacteriophage has at least 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 98.5, 99, 99.1, 99.2, 99.3, 99.4, 99.5, 99.6, 99.7, 99.8, 99.9, or even 100% sequence homology or identity with SEQ ID NO. 1. In some forms, the bacteriophage genome encodes an amino acid sequence having at least at 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 98.5, 99, 99.1, 99.2, 99.3, 99.4, 99.5, 99.6, 99.7, 99.8, 99.9, or even 100% sequence homology or identity with at least 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, 120, 125, 130, 135, 140, 145, 150, 155, 160, 165, 170, 175, 180, 185, 190, 195, 200, 205, 210, 215, 220, 225, 230, 235, 240, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, or 265 open reading frames from SEQ ID NO. 1. In some forms, the beginning and end points of the sequence encoding the amino acid sequences are denoted in Table 3 and are relative to SEQ ID NO. 1. In some forms, the bacteriophage genome has at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11 tRNA genes in common with SEQ ID NO. 1. In some forms, the beginning and end points of the tRNA genes are denoted in Table 2 and are relative to SEQ ID NO. 1.


In various forms, also described herein is a method of preparing the bacteriophage described above. The method generally comprises obtaining an agricultural waste sample, performing a viral plaque assay on the agricultural waste sample using a target bacterial strain, iteratively transferring plaque samples to a buffer to form a purified phage solution, and then cultivating the purified phage solution in a mixture with a saturated bacterial culture. In various forms, the method further comprises centrifuging and filtering the mixture to remove bacterial debris and precipitating the bacteriophage. In various forms, the mixture comprises tryptic soy broth as a medium for the bacterial culture. In various forms, the mixture is incubated at 37° C. In various forms, the mixture is cultured in an incubator for 24 hours. In various forms, the precipitated bacteriophage is resuspended in a saline magnesium buffer.


In various forms, also described herein is a food product resistant to E. coli contamination comprising a food substance and a plurality of bacteriophages incorporated into or onto the food substance. The bacteriophage is CAM-21 deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant that is described herein, and/or has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, and/or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli.


In various forms, also described herein is a method of making a food product resistant to E. coli contamination. In various forms, the method generally comprises providing a food substance and providing a plurality of bacteriophages. The bacteriophage is CAM-21 deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant that is described herein, and/or has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, and/or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli. The method further comprises incorporating the plurality of bacteriophage CAM-21, variant, or combination thereof into or onto the food substance.


For purposes of both the food product and the method described above, in various forms, the food substance is selected from the group consisting of dairy products, meat, fish, fruits, vegetables, and combinations thereof. In various forms, the food substance is a dairy product selected from the group consisting of milk, yogurt, butter, ice cream, cheese and cream. In various forms, the food product is pasteurized or unpasteurized. In various forms, the food substance is selected from the group consisting of dairy products, meat, fish, fruits, vegetables, and combinations thereof. In various forms, the food substance is a meat selected from the group consisting of beef, pork, poultry, lamb, bison, venison, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the meat is ground, chopped, sliced or cut. In various forms, the food substance is a fruit selected from the group consisting of apple, banana, orange, pineapple, kiwi, mango, papaya, peach, plum, pear, grape, lemon, lime, strawberry, raspberry, blueberry, blackberry, cherry, watermelon, cantaloupe, honeydew, grapefruit, tangerine, pomegranate, coconut, avocado, guava, passion fruit, lychee, fig, date, apricot, nectarine, cranberry, elderberry, gooseberry, currant, boysenberry, persimmon, quince, kumquat, dragon fruit, star fruit, durian, jackfruit, rambutan, prickly pear, feijoa, loquat, longan, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the food substance is a vegetable selected from the group consisting of lettuce, spinach, broccoli, cauliflower, carrots, peas, beans, bell peppers, tomatoes, cucumbers, zucchini, kale, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, celery, radish, beetroot, onion, garlic, leek, turnip, parsnip, sweet potato, potato, pumpkin, squash, eggplant, okra, asparagus, artichoke, corn, fennel, Swiss chard, collard greens, mustard greens, bok choy, arugula, watercress, endive, chicory, kohlrabi, rutabaga, jicama, yam, taro, bamboo shoots, beet greens, celeriac, daikon, horseradish, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the food product is a fruit or vegetable that is cut, chopped, sliced, pureed, or mashed. In various forms, the food substance has a pH between 4 and 11.


In various forms, also described herein is a method of making an encapsulated bacteriophage. The method generally comprises providing one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials, providing a solvent, combining the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials and the solvent to form an encapsulant, providing a bacteriophage solution comprising a plurality of bacteriophage, where the bacteriophage is CAM-21 deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant described herein, and/or that has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, and/or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli, mixing the encapsulant with the bacteriophage solution to form a bacteriophage encapsulation material, and extruding the bacteriophage encapsulation material to produce an encapsulated bacteriophage.


In various forms, also described herein is a method of making an encapsulated bacteriophage. The method comprises providing one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials, providing a solvent, combining the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials and the solvent to form an encapsulant, providing a bacteriophage solution comprising a plurality of bacteriophage, where the bacteriophage is CAM-21 deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant described herein, and/or that has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, and/or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli, and spray-drying and electrospinning the bacteriophage with encapsulant to produce an encapsulated bacteriophage.


In various forms as applied to either of the methods of making an encapsulated bacteriophage described above, various exemplary forms pertain. For example, in various forms, the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials is selected from the group consisting of soy protein isolate (SPI), whey protein concentrate (WPC), oligosaccharides, starch including modified starch (corn syrup), pullulan, gelatin, acetate cellulose, sodium caseinate, glycerol, sodium alginate (SA), carboxymethylcellulose, cellulose nanofiber, and combinations thereof. In some forms, the oligosaccharides are derived from soybean by-products. In some forms, the starches are from underutilized products like tapioca. In various forms, the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials comprises sodium alginate. In various forms, the solvent is selected from the group consisting of distilled water, a buffer, organic acids, alcohols, ethylene glycol, and dimethyl sulfoxide. In various forms, the solvent is water and the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials comprise sodium alginate. In various forms, the encapsulant comprises 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, or even 3.0 wt % sodium alginate. In some forms, the encapsulant comprises about 2.5 wt % sodium alginate. In various forms, the bacteriophage solution comprises at least 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, or 10 wt % of the plurality of bacteriophage. In various forms, the bacteriophage solution comprises between 0.1 wt % and 10 wt % of the plurality of bacteriophage. In various forms, the bacteriophage solution comprises between 1 wt % and 5 wt % of the plurality of bacteriophage. In various forms, the bacteriophage encapsulation material is extruded through a needle during the extruding. In various forms, the bacteriophage encapsulation material is extruded into a 0.1 to 3 M calcium chloride solution. In various forms, the methods further comprise filtering and/or washing the encapsulated bacteriophage with deionized water. In various forms, the pH of the bacteriophage solution is between 3 and 11.


In various forms, also described herein is a method of making an antimicrobial film, generally comprising the steps of providing one or more proteins and/or carbohydrates, providing a solvent, providing a plurality of encapsulated bacteriophages or a plurality of bacteriophages, where the bacteriophage is CAM-21 deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant described herein, and/or that has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, and/or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli, mixing the one or more proteins and/or carbohydrates, the solvent, and the plurality of encapsulated bacteriophage or the plurality of bacteriophage to form a film-forming solution, casting the film-forming solution onto a substrate, and drying the film-forming solution to form an antimicrobial film. In various forms, the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials is selected from the group consisting of soy protein isolate (SPI), whey protein concentrate (WPC), starches including modified starch (corn syrup), oligosaccharides, pullulan, gelatin, acetate cellulose, sodium caseinate, glycerol, sodium alginate (SA), carboxymethylcellulose, cellulose nanofiber, and any combination thereof. In some forms, the oligosaccharides are derived from soybean by-products. In some forms, the starches are from underutilized products like tapioca. In various forms, the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials comprise carboxymethylcellulose and/or sodium alginate. In various forms, the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials comprise pullulan, sodium alginate, or glycerol. In various forms, the one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials comprise soy-protein isolate, cellulose nanofiber, or glycerol. In various forms, the solvent is selected from the group consisting of distilled water, a buffer, organic acids, alcohols, ethylene glycol, and dimethyl sulfoxide. In various forms, the pH of the film-forming solution is between 3 and 11.


In various forms, also described herein is an antimicrobial film comprising a film and a plurality of bacteriophage incorporated into or onto the film, wherein the bacteriophage is CAM-21 deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant described herein, and/or that has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, and/or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli. In various forms, the film comprises one or more proteins and/or carbohydrate materials. In various forms, the film comprises one or more proteins and/or carbohydrate materials selected from the group consisting of soy protein isolate (SPI), whey protein concentrate (WPC), oligosaccharides, starch including modified starch (corn syrup), pullulan, gelatin, acetate cellulose, sodium caseinate, glycerol, sodium alginate (SA), carboxymethylcellulose, cellulose nanofiber, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the one or more proteins and/or carbohydrate materials comprise carboxymethylcelluose and/or sodium alginate. In some forms, the oligosaccharides are derived from soybean by-products. In some forms, the starches are from underutilized products like tapioca. In various forms, the one or more proteins and/or carbohydrate materials comprise pullulan, sodium alginate, or glycerol. In various forms, the one or more proteins and/or carbohydrate materials comprise soy-protein isolate, cellulose nanofiber, or glycerol. In various forms, the film comprises at least 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5, or 10 wt % of the plurality of bacteriophage. In various forms, the film comprises between 0.1 wt % and 10 wt % of the plurality of bacteriophage. In various forms, the film comprises between 3 wt % and 6 wt % of the plurality of bacteriophage. In various forms, the bacteriophages are encapsulated. In various forms, the bacteriophages are encapsulated in a hydrogel, nanogel, carbohydrate, protein, and/or any combination thereof. In various forms, the bacteriophages are encapsulated in sodium alginate. In various forms, the bacteriophages are homogenously incorporated into the film. In various forms, the antimicrobial film is biodegradable. In various forms, the pH of the antimicrobial film is between 3 and 11. In various forms, antimicrobial films in accordance with this disclosure do not differ from films having the same composition but lacking the bacteriophage described herein. In preferred forms, at least one measurement of the color, lightness, redness, yellowness, opacity, tensile strength, flexibility, stretchability, and stability, are at least 95, 95.5, 96, 96.5, 97, 97.5, 98, 98.5, 99, 99.1, 99.2, 99.3, 99.4, 99.5, 99.6, 99.7, 99.8, 99.9, and even 100% identical between films having bacteriophage in accordance with this disclosure and films not including such bacteriophage, but otherwise having the same composition for the film.


In various forms, also described herein is a method of making a packaged food product, generally comprising the steps of providing a food substance, providing an antimicrobial film in accordance with the above description, and packaging the food substance with the antimicrobial film to form a packaged food product. In various forms, the food substance is selected from the group consisting of dairy products, meat, fish, fruits, vegetables, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the food substance is a dairy product selected from the group consisting of milk, yogurt, butter, ice cream, cheese and cream. In various forms, the food product is pasteurized or unpasteurized. In various forms, the food substance is selected from the group consisting of dairy products, meat, fish, fruits, vegetables, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the food substance is a meat selected from the group consisting of beef, pork, poultry, lamb, bison, venison, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the meat is ground, chopped, sliced or cut. In various forms, the food substance is a fruit selected from the group consisting of apple, banana, orange, pineapple, kiwi, mango, papaya, peach, plum, pear, grape, lemon, lime, strawberry, raspberry, blueberry, blackberry, cherry, watermelon, cantaloupe, honeydew, grapefruit, tangerine, pomegranate, coconut, avocado, guava, passion fruit, lychee, fig, date, apricot, nectarine, cranberry, elderberry, gooseberry, currant, boysenberry, persimmon, quince, kumquat, dragon fruit, star fruit, durian, jackfruit, rambutan, prickly pear, feijoa, loquat, longan, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the food substance is a vegetable selected from the group consisting of lettuce, spinach, broccoli, cauliflower, carrots, peas, beans, bell peppers, tomatoes, cucumbers, zucchini, kale, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, celery, radish, beetroot, onion, garlic, leek, turnip, parsnip, sweet potato, potato, pumpkin, squash, eggplant, okra, asparagus, artichoke, corn, fennel, Swiss chard, collard greens, mustard greens, bok choy, arugula, watercress, endive, chicory, kohlrabi, rutabaga, jicama, yam, taro, bamboo shoots, beet greens, celeriac, daikon, horseradish, and any combination thereof. In various forms, the food product is a fruit or vegetable that is cut, chopped, sliced, pureed, or mashed. In various forms, the antimicrobial film has a pH between 3 and 11.


In various forms, also described herein is a biosensor comprising an N-doped graphene quantum dot and a bacteriophage, where the bacteriophage is CAM-21 deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant described herein, and/or that has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, and/or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli, where the bacteriophage is conjugated to the N-doped graphene quantum dot to produce an altered photoluminescence emission spectrum when the biosensor comes into contact with pathogenic E. coli and is excited by light of an excitation wavelength. In various forms, the pathogenic Eschirichia coli is a Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. In various forms, the N-doped graphene quantum dot is an orange emissive N-doped graphene quantum dot.


In various forms, also described herein is a method of producing a quantum dot-bacteriophage biosensor, comprising providing a solution comprising one or more N-doped quantum dots, providing a solution comprising one or more bacteriophages, where the bacteriophage is CAM-21 deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477, or is a variant described herein, and/or that has the same phenotypic characteristics of bacteriophage CAM-21, and/or is some combination thereof, and has lytic activity against pathogenic E. coli, and conjugating and/or crosslinking the one or more N-doped quantum dots to the one or more bacteriophages thereby forming a quantum dot-bacteriophage conjugated biosensor. In various forms, the N-doped graphene quantum dot is an orange emissive graphene quantum dot. In various forms, the method further comprises isolating the one or more quantum dot-bacteriophage conjugated biosensors. In various forms, the isolating is carried out by ultracentrifugation, gel electrophoresis, column chromatography, high pressure liquid chromatography, dialysis, and any combination thereof.


In various forms, also described herein is a method of detecting E. coli in or on a food product by using a quantum dot-bacteriophage biosensor as described herein. The method comprises providing a food product, providing a quantum dot-bacteriophage biosensor as described herein, applying the quantum dot-bacteriophage biosensor onto and/or in the food product, applying light from an excitation source to the quantum dot-bacteriophage biosensor on and/or in the food product, detecting a photoluminescence spectrum emitted by the quantum dot-bacteriophage biosensor, and identifying the presence or absence of E. coli in or on the food product on the basis of an intensity or wavelength of photoluminescence and/or a photoluminescence lifetime.





DRAWINGS

The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings in any way.



FIG. 1 shows a graph depicting evaluation of lytic activity of Escherichia phage CAM-21 using E. coli O157:H7 strain C7927 as the host bacteria at multiplicity of infection values ranging from 0.0001 to 100.



FIGS. 2A-2D show transmission electron microscopic images of Escherichia phage CAM-21.



FIG. 2A shows the morphology of CAM-21.



FIG. 2B shows the attachment of numerous phages on surface receptors of the bacterial cell.



FIG. 2C shows the formation of progeny phages in the bacterial cell.



FIG. 2D shows the release of progeny phages from infected cells through lysis.



FIG. 3A is a graph showing the optimal multiplicity of infection of CAM-21. Data points denoted with different letters are significantly different (P≤0.05).



FIG. 3B is a graph showing the rate of phage adsorption. Data points denoted with different letters are significantly different (P≤0.05).



FIG. 3C is a graph showing the one-step growth curve of CAM-21. Data points denoted with different letters are significantly different (P≤0.05).



FIG. 4 is a genomic map of Escherichia phage CAM-21. Each color in the figure legend represents predicted open reading frames (ORFs), GC skew and GC content of CAM-21.



FIG. 5A shows a phylogenetic tree based on the complete genome sequence of bacteriophages from the subfamily of Tevenvirinae, including Escherichia phage CAM-21.



FIG. 5B shows a phylogenetic tree based on the major capsid protein of bacteriophages from the subfamily of Tevenvirinae, including Escherichia phage CAM-21.



FIG. 5C shows a phylogenetic tree based on the terminase large subunit of bacteriophages from the subfamily of Tevenvirinae, including Escherichia phage CAM-21.



FIG. 6 shows genomic comparison of Escherichia phage CAM-21 with four other closely related phages, including Escherichia phage wv7, vB_EcoM_BECP11, vB_EcoM_UFV09, and T4, using EasyFig.



FIGS. 7A-7F show the antimicrobial effect of Escherichia phage CAM-21 on the survival of E. coli O157:H7 on refrigerated food samples.



FIG. 7A shows milk at an MOI value of 1,000.



FIG. 7B shows milk at an MOI value of 10,000.



FIG. 7C shows ground beef at an MOI value of 1,000.



FIG. 7D shows ground beef at an MOI value of 10,000.



FIG. 7E shows baby spinach at an MOI value of 1,000.



FIG. 7F shows baby spinach at an MOI value of 10,000.



FIG. 8A is a bar graph showing tensile strength results for various biopolymer films.



FIG. 8B is a bar graph showing elongation at break results for various biopolymer films.



FIG. 9A is a confocal microscopic image of CAM-21 dyed with a fluorescent stain in an SM buffer.



FIG. 9B is a confocal microscopic image of CAM-21 dyed with a fluorescent stain in a soy protein isolate film.



FIG. 10A is a SEM image of soy protein isolate film surfaces comprising 0% bacteriophage at magnification of 1000×.



FIG. 10B is a SEM image of soy protein isolate film surfaces comprising 1% bacteriophage at magnification of 1000×.



FIG. 10C is a SEM images of soy protein isolate film surfaces comprising 4% bacteriophage at magnification of 1000×.



FIG. 11 provides FTIR spectra of carbohydrate biopolymer films incorporated with CAM-21 bacteriophage.



FIG. 12 provides particle size distribution spectra measured for various carbohydrate biopolymer films.



FIG. 13A shows the inhibition of E. coli O157:H7 in tryptic soy broth by soy protein isolate films comprising different concentrations of CAM-21 bacteriophage. Bars labeled with different letters within a single incubation period are significantly different (P≤0.05).



FIG. 13B shows the inhibition of E. coli O157:H7 in peptone water by various carbohydrate biopolymer films. Films labeled with suffix ‘D’ comprise CAM-21 bacteriophage.



FIG. 14A shows the antimicrobial activity of soy protein isolate films incorporated with CAM-21 on E. coli O157:H7 on raw bottom round beef. Bars labeled with different letters within a single storage period are significantly different (P≤0.05).



FIG. 14B shows the antimicrobial activity of soy protein isolate films incorporated with CAM-21 on E. coli O157:H7 on raw beef trimmings. Bars labeled with different letters within a single storage period are significantly different (P≤ 0.05).



FIG. 15 shows the antimicrobial activity of carbohydrate biopolymer films incorporated with CAM-21 on E. coli O157:H7 on spinach leaves.



FIG. 16A shows a photograph of electrophoresis of purified NGQDs under daylight.



FIG. 16B shows a photograph of electrophoresis of purified NGQDs under ultraviolet light.



FIG. 17 shows UV-vis absorption spectra of NGQDs at an excitation wavelength of 365 nm.



FIG. 18A shows an XRD spectrum of NGQDs.



FIG. 18B shows an XPS survey scan of NGQDs.



FIG. 19 shows UV-vis spectra of O-NGQDs at an excitation wavelength of 365 nm.



FIG. 20 shows variations in photoluminescence intensity from O-NGQDs as a function of excitation wavelength.



FIG. 21 shows an FTIR spectrum of exemplary O-NGQD sample.



FIG. 22 shows variations in photoluminescence intensity from O-NGQDs as a function of varying water content in DMSO.



FIG. 23 shows photoluminescence spectra of O-NGQDs in 100% water and in 20% DMSO-water solution.



FIG. 24 shows comparative photoluminescence spectra of O-NGQDs alone and in conjugation with bacteriophage CAM-21.





Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of drawings.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the present teachings, application, or uses. Throughout this specification, like reference numerals will be used to refer to like elements. Additionally, the embodiments disclosed below are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed in the following detailed description. Rather, the embodiments are chosen and described so that others skilled in the art can utilize their teachings. As well, it should be understood that the drawings are intended to illustrate and plainly disclose presently envisioned embodiments to one of skill in the art, but are not intended to be manufacturing level drawings or renditions of final products and may include simplified conceptual views to facilitate understanding or explanation. As well, the relative size and arrangement of the components may differ from that shown and still operate within the spirit of the invention.


As used herein, the word “exemplary” or “illustrative” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as “exemplary” or “illustrative” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations. All of the implementations described below are exemplary implementations provided to enable persons skilled in the art to practice the disclosure and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular example embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” may be intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “including”, and “having” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. The method steps, processes, and operations described herein are not to be construed as necessarily requiring their performance in the particular order discussed or illustrated, unless specifically identified as an order of performance. It is also to be understood that additional or alternative steps can be employed.


When an element, object, device, apparatus, component, region or section, etc., is referred to as being “on”, “engaged to or with”, “connected to or with”, or “coupled to or with” another element, object, device, apparatus, component, region or section, etc., it can be directly on, engaged, connected or coupled to or with the other element, object, device, apparatus, component, region or section, etc., or intervening elements, objects, devices, apparatuses, components, regions or sections, etc., can be present. In contrast, when an element, object, device, apparatus, component, region or section, etc., is referred to as being “directly on”, “directly engaged to”, “directly connected to”, or “directly coupled to” another element, object, device, apparatus, component, region or section, etc., there may be no intervening elements, objects, devices, apparatuses, components, regions or sections, etc., present. Other words used to describe the relationship between elements, objects, devices, apparatuses, components, regions or sections, etc., should be interpreted in a like fashion (e.g., “between” versus “directly between”, “adjacent” versus “directly adjacent”, etc.).


As used herein the phrase “operably connected to” will be understood to mean two are more elements, objects, devices, apparatuses, components, etc., that are directly or indirectly connected to each other in an operational and/or cooperative manner such that operation or function of at least one of the elements, objects, devices, apparatuses, components, etc., imparts or causes operation or function of at least one other of the elements, objects, devices, apparatuses, components, etc. Such imparting or causing of operation or function can be unilateral or bilateral.


As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. For example, A and/or B includes A alone, or B alone, or both A and B.


Although the terms first, second, third, etc. can be used herein to describe various elements, objects, devices, apparatuses, components, regions or sections, etc., these elements, objects, devices, apparatuses, components, regions or sections, etc., should not be limited by these terms. These terms may be used only to distinguish one element, object, device, apparatus, component, region or section, etc., from another element, object, device, apparatus, component, region or section, etc., and do not necessarily imply a sequence or order unless clearly indicated by the context.


Moreover, it will be understood that various directions such as “upper”, “lower”, “bottom”, “top”, “left”, “right”, “first”, “second” and so forth are made only with respect to explanation in conjunction with the drawings, and that components may be oriented differently, for instance, during transportation and manufacturing as well as operation. Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the concept(s) taught herein, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments described herein, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and non-limiting.


EXAMPLES
Example 1: Preparation of CAM-21 Bacteriophage

Ninety bacterial strains, obtained from the University of Missouri, Food Microbiology Lab culture collection (Table 1) were cultured in Tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) for 24 h at 37° C. In Table 1, “+” denotes the formation of plaques; “−” denotes the absence of plaque, and EHEC denotes Enterohemorrhagic E. coli. All bacterial strains were utilized for the phage host range study, and E. coli O157:H7 strain C7927 was utilized as the host bacterium for phage isolation and purification, and production of a high titer phage stock. This bacterial strain was also used to evaluate the inhibition effect of isolated phages in foods.


Twenty lagoon slurry and fecal samples were collected from Foremost Dairy Research Center (Columbia, MO, USA) for phage isolation. Briefly, 5 g of sample were mixed with saline magnesium (SM) buffer (0.1 M NaCl, 0.008 M MgSO4, 0.05 M Tris-HCl, 0.01% gelatin, pH 7.5) and centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 min at 4° C. Then, the mixture was filtered through a polyether sulfone (PES) filter membrane (pore size=0.20 μm; Nalgene, Rochester, NJ, USA). The double-layer agar technique was performed by adding 100 μL of diluted filtrate and 100 μL of log-phase host strain in a test tube containing 5 mL of melted top agar (TSB, 1.25 mM CaCl2, and 0.5% agar). The mixture was then overlaid on a pre-poured tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Difco Laboratories) plate. The melted agar was allowed to solidify before incubation of the sample for 24 h at 37° C. To purify the phages, each plaque was picked with a sterile pipette tip from the agar plate and added into 300 μL of SM buffer. The phage suspension was stored overnight at 4° C. prior to the next experiment, for time efficiency's sake. The double-layer agar technique, as previously mentioned, was performed using 100 μL of the phage suspension. Then, the melted agar was allowed to solidify before incubating for 24 h at 37° C. The purification step was repeated three times. The purified phage was then stored in SM buffer at 4° C. before subsequent analyses.


A high titer phage stock was produced using a polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation technique. One hundred microliters of purified phage solution were mixed with 1 mL of saturated bacterial culture (˜109 CFU/mL) in TSB and the mixture allowed to sit for 15 min at 37° C. The phage/bacterial suspension was added into 10 mL of TSB and cultured in a shaker-incubator with shaking at a speed of 200 rpm for 24 h at 37° C. After centrifuging at 11,739×g for 15 min, the suspension was filtered using a PES filter membrane (pore size=0.22 μm; Merck Millipore, Cork, Ireland). Then, 10 wt % of PEG 8000 was added and the solution was left overnight at 4° C. to allow for complete precipitation of the phages (Carroll-Portillo et al., 2021). The phage pellet was precipitated by centrifuging at 16,904×g for 15 min at 4° C. After the removal of the supernatant, 1 mL of SM buffer was added to resuspend the pellet and this was used as the phage stock. The phage count was determined using the double-layer agar method.


For preparation of phage stock specifically for preparation in films as described below, 100 μL of overnight grown culture of E. coli O157:H7 was transferred to 4 mL of Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), and the culture incubated at 37° C. with shaking at 200 rpm for 6 h. One milliliter of phage stock solution in SM buffer was then added and the mixture was incubated at 37° C. for 15 min. Then, the bacteria/phage mixture was transferred to 150 mL of TSB in a flask and allowed to incubate at 37° C. with shaking (200 rpm) for 20-24 h to promote phage replication. The suspension was then centrifuged at 11,739×g for 15 min to separate out bacterial debris, and the resulting supernatant containing CAM-21 phage was filtered through a 0.22 μm PES membrane filter (Merck Millipore, Cork, Ireland) to achieve a purified phage solution. The phage solution was then centrifuged at 671,328×g for 2 h at 4° C. After removal of the supernatant, 2 mL of SM buffer were added to the pellet and the suspension kept in 4° C. overnight to allow complete resuspension of the phage pellet in SM buffer. The phage count was determined by the double layer agar method.









TABLE 1







- Host Specificity of Escherichia phage CAM-21











Bacterial



Plaque


Species
Source
Strain
Pathotype
Formation






E. coli

Clinical
ATCC 25922
Nonpathogenic




Isolate



K-12 wild
ATCC 23716
Nonpathogenic




type



E. coli O157:H7

Human
C7927
EHEC
+




3178-95
EHEC
+




G5101
EHEC
+




86-24
EHEC
+




93-111
EHEC
+




OK-1
EHEC
+




2886-75
EHEC
+



Beef
505B
EHEC
+




MF 1847
EHEC
+



Hamburger
EDL933
EHEC
+



E. coli O26:H11

Not known
H19
EHEC
+



Human
97-3250
EHEC




E. coli O26

Human
DEC10C
EHEC
+




TB285C
EHEC
+




VP30
EHEC
+




DEC9A
EHEC
+




DEC9F
EHEC




E. coli O45:H2

Human
M103-19
EHEC





MIO1-88
EHEC





MI05-14
EHEC




E. coli O45:HNM

Human
DA-21
EHEC




E. coli O45

Human
DEC11C
EHEC





5431-72
EHEC





4309-72
EHEC




Cow
88-4110-H
EHEC





D88-28058
EHEC




Pig
2566-58
EHEC




E. coli O103:H2

Human
MT#80
EHEC
+



E. coli O103:H6

Human
TB154A
EHEC
+



E. coli O103:HN

Human
PT91-24
EHEC
+



E. coli O103:H25

Human
8419
EHEC
+



E. coli O103

Human
DA-41
EHEC
+




6:38
EHEC
+




DA-55
EHEC
+




87-2931
EHEC
+




GS
EHEC
+




G5550637



E. coli O104:H

Cow
TW 01435
EHEC




Human
ECOR-28
EHEC




E. coli O104

Human
E28
EHEC




E. coli O111:H2

Human
RD8
EHEC




E. coli O111:H8

Human
3215-99
EHEC




E. coli O111:H11

Human
0201 9611
EHEC




E. coli O111:HNM

Human
3007-85
EHEC




E. coli O111

Human
CL-37
EHEC





DEC8B
EHEC





TB226A
EHEC





928/91
EHEC





412/55
EHEC




Cow
DEC8C
EHEC




E. coli O121:H19

Human
MT#2
EHEC




E. coli O121:H[19]

Human
DA5
EHEC




E. coli O121

Human
87-2914
EHEC





DA1
EHEC




Not known
7927+++
EHEC





PT91-4
EHEC



E. coli O145:HNT
Human
IH-16
EHEC
+



Unknown
D177
EHEC
+



E. coli O145:HNM

Human
75-83
EHEC





GS
EHEC





G5578620



E. coli O145

Human
TB269C
EHEC
+




MT#66
EHEC
+




DEC101
EHEC




Cow
BCL73
EHEC
+




B6820-C1
EHEC
+



Not known
70300885
EHEC
+




6940
EHEC
+



Salmonella

Turkey
14-7
Pathogenic




Enteritidis


14-10
Pathogenic





14-11
Pathogenic




Salmonella

Not known

Pathogenic




Newport




Salmonella

Not known

Nonpathogenic




bongori




Salmonella

Not known

Pathogenic




Thompson




Salmonella

Not known

Pathogenic




Bareilly




Salmonella

Chicken
ATCC 14028
Pathogenic




Typhimurium

Turkey
I4






788





Shigella sonei

Not known
ATCC 9290
Pathogenic




Shigella flexneri

Feces
ATCC 25929
Pathogenic




Listeria innocua

Cabbage
ATCC 51742
Nonpathogenic




Listeria

Rabbit
ATCC 15313
Pathogenic




monocytogenes




Staphylococcus

Wound
ATCC 29213
Pathogenic




aureus

Pleural fluid
ATCC 12600
Pathogenic




Not known
ATCC 29737
Pathogenic




Bacillus cereus

Not known
ATCC 10876
Pathogenic




Bacillus

Food and
ATCC 7050
Nonpathogenic




coagulans

beverage



Bacillus

Not known
ATCC
Nonpathogenic




megaterium




Lysinibacillus

Not known
ATCC 4525
Nonpathogenic




sphaericus










Example 2: Host Range Study of CAM-21

The host spectrum of CAM-21 was studied based on a reported plaque assay method with some modifications. Ninety strains of bacteria (Table 1) were selected for the study. Briefly, 100 μL of phage suspension (109 PFU/mL) and 100 μL of log-phase host bacteria were mixed with 5 mL of melted top agar. The melted agar was poured onto pre-solidified TSA plates. The plaque formation on the agar plates was determined after incubation at 37° C. for 24 h. SM buffer was utilized as a control.


CAM-21 exhibited a host specificity towards four STEC serotypes (Table 1), forming plaques with 32 out of 90 total bacterial strains tested. CAM-21 was capable to lyse several strains of STEC serotypes, which include E. coli O157:H7 (10/10), O26 (5/7), O103 (9/9) and O145 (8/11). On the contrary, it did not lyse non-O157 STEC, viz., O45, O104, O111, and O121, non-pathogenic E. coli, and other bacterial genera, including Salmonella, Shigella, Listeria, Staphylococcus, and Bacillus.


Example 3: Lytic Activity of CAM-21

The lytic activity of CAM-21 was evaluated based on a reported method with modifications. One hundred microliters of phage suspensions (103-109 PFU/mL), diluted from the phage stock (109 PFU/mL), were added into 100 μL of E. coli O157:H7 (107 CFU/mL) at various multiplicity of infection (MOI), from 0.0001 to 100, in a 96-well plate before incubating at 37° C. for up to 24 h. SM buffer was utilized as a control. A BioTek Synergy HT multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) was used to measure the optical density at a wavelength of 600 nm (OD600) at various time intervals.


As compared to the control, CAM-21 had a strong inhibitory effect on target bacterial growth at all tested MOI values (FIG. 1). Without exposure to CAM-21, the bacterial cells reached the exponential growth phase after a 2-h incubation, and the OD600 value increased for up to 24 h. With the phage treatment at MOI≥0.001, the bacterial growth was clearly inhibited as all the OD600 values were <0.15 after 24 h of incubation. However, at MOI=0.0001, the OD600 value increased for up to 4 h, followed by a slight reduction to about 0.2, indicating limited growth. However, the OD600 value was still less than that of the phage-free control after 24 h, indicating the strong inhibitory effect of CAM-21 on the target bacterial growth.


Example 4: TEM Imaging of CAM-21 and Bacterial Lysis

The phage morphology was investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEM-1400, JEOL Ltd., Peabody, MA). Phage particles were concentrated by centrifuging at 46,378×g at 4° C. for 2 h (Model Optima L-90K, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) before resuspending the pellet in SM buffer. A negative staining technique was performed for phage preparation. Five microliters of phage suspension were deposited on copper/carbon grids for 1 min and stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid for 30 s. The grids were air-dried before TEM imaging at 80 kV. The phage size was estimated using an ImageJ software (Version 0.5.3).


To investigate the bacterial lysis by CAM-21, the concentrated phage suspension was first prepared according to the method described. Bacterial cells and phage particles were mixed at a MOI of 1, and incubated for 20 min at 37° C. to allow for the attachment of phage particles to E. coli O157:H7 C7927. Before TEM imaging, the specimen was prepared. Sodium cacodylate (SC) buffer (0.1 M, pH=7.35) containing 2% para-formaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde was used to primarily fix the bacterial cells, followed by rinsing with 0.13 M sucrose in SC buffer (0.1M). SC buffer containing 1% OsO4 was used for a secondary microwave fixation for 1 min, and the sample left for 1 h at 4° C. The specimens were rinsed with SC buffer and distilled water. Aqueous uranyl acetate (1%) was used for en bloc staining before storing the samples overnight at 4° C. The treated samples were rinsed with distilled water, followed by a series of graded dehydration. An Epon resin was used to infiltrate the dehydrated samples for 24 h before polymerization at 60° C. overnight. An ultramicrotome (Ultracut UCT, Leica Microsystems, Germany) and a diamond knife (Diatome, Hatfield, PA, USA) were utilized to prepare thin sections with a thickness of 85 nm before observing with TEM at 80 kV.


CAM-21 has a polyhedron capsid (diameter=92.83±8.97 nm) and a contractile tail (length=129.75±1.50 nm) (FIG. 2A). Morphological analysis of host lysis showed that infection of target bacteria was initiated by attachment of the phage tail fibers to surface receptors on the cell wall of the bacteria (FIG. 2B). Immature progeny virions were formed within the infected cell (FIG. 2C). Progeny phages were eventually released through bacterial cell lysis (FIG. 2D).


Example 5: Optimal MOI

The optimal MOI of CAM-21 was evaluated based on an earlier method with some modifications. One hundred microliters of phage suspension and 100 μL of log phase E. coli O157:H7 C7927 (˜108 CFU/mL) were mixed at various MOI values from 0.0001 to 1000. The mixture solutions were added into 800 μL of TSB and incubated in a shaker incubator with a shaking speed of 180 rpm for 4 h at 37° C. The cultures were centrifuged at 9300×g for 15 min before phage titers were evaluated using the double-layer agar technique. The optimal MOI of the phage is the one with the highest phage count.


At a MOI of 0.001, CAM-21 produced the highest phage titer, which was 8.08 log PFU/mL, indicating the optimal MOI of this phage (FIG. 3A). However, the phage titer was not significantly different (P>0.05) from those at MOI of 0.1 and 0.01, which were 7.87 and 7.91 log PFU/mL, respectively. The findings revealed that the bacterial infection was still effective even when at a lower phage count.


Example 6: Phage Adsorption Study and One-Step Growth

The adsorption study of CAM-21 was performed. One milliliter of a freshly grown (3 h) culture of E. coli O157:H7 (108 CFU/mL) was centrifuged at 9300×g for 5 min to obtain a cell pellet that was resuspended in 900 μl of 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then, 100 μL of phage suspension (106 PFU/mL) was added, followed by incubation at 37° C. At intervals of 1 min for the first 5 min and 5 min for the next 10 min, a 100 μL aliquot was collected and added into 900 μL of PBS. The suspension was centrifuged at 13,400×g for 2 min. The unabsorbed phage count was determined using the double-layer agar method. The proportion of phage count to the initial phage count at each time interval was expressed as the percentage of unabsorbed phage.


One-step growth of CAM-21 was evaluated. Briefly, 1 mL of a freshly grown (3 h) culture of E. coli O157:H7 (108 CFU/mL) was centrifuged at 9300×g for 5 min to obtain a cell pellet before resuspending it in 1 mL of PBS. Next, 1 mL of phage suspension (105 PFU/mL) was mixed with the bacterial suspension to achieve a MOI of 0.001. The mixture solution was incubated for 15 min at 37° C., followed by centrifugation at 9300×g for 5 min. The cell pellet was washed twice using TSB under the same centrifugation conditions, and resuspended in 10 mL of TSB. The sample was incubated in a shaker incubator while shaking at a speed of 180 rpm at 37° C. For the measurement of phage number, 100 μL of aliquot were collected at every 10 min for 2 h and plated using the double-layer agar method. The latent time and burst size were estimated using the growth curve of CAM-21.


The growth characteristics of CAM-21 were evaluated using adsorption and one-step growth analysis at an optimum MOI of 0.001. After 1 min of incubation, approximately 49% of the phage had adsorbed to the host bacteria, as compared to the original population (FIG. 3B). As the suspension was incubated for a longer period, the percentage of unabsorbed phage was decreased. After 15 min of incubation, about 88% of the initial population was absorbed to the host cells. Based on the one-step growth curve, the burst size and latent time of CAM-21 were approximately 69 PFU/infected cell and 20 min, respectively (FIG. 3C).


Example 7: Genomic DNA Analysis

CAM-21 genomic DNA extraction was performed using a phage DNA isolation kit (Norgen Biotek, Corp., Thorold, ON, Canada) based on the manufacturer's instructions. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted using the MiSeq sequencing platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The high-quality filtered reads were assembled using Unicycler. The open reading frames (ORF) were predicted and annotated using the RAST server and BLASTP analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Potential tRNA genes were predicted using tRNAscan-SE. The complete genomic sequence of CAM-21 was deposited in GenBank (accession number OP611477). The potential virulence and antimicrobial resistance factors of CAM-21 were screened using VirulenceFinder-2.0 and ResFinder-4.1, respectively. Screenings for genes related to lysogenic activity and allergenicity were conducted using the databases of PHASTER and AllergenOnline (Version 21), respectively. The CGView server was used to construct a circular genome map of CAM-21. To construct the phylogenetic trees, 30 bacteriophages were chosen from the subfamily, Tevenvirinae, including CAM-21. First, Virus Classification and Tree Building Online Resource (VICTOR) was used to develop a phylogenetic tree based on the whole genome sequences of these phages. The phylogenetic trees were also constructed based on the major capsid protein and terminase large subunit of the bacteriophages by the neighbor-joining technique with a bootstrap value of 1000 after the multiple protein sequence alignment was performed, using the Mega software (Version 11). Using EasyFig (Version 2.2.5), a multiple gene alignment was performed to compare the genome of CAM-21 to its closely related phages, including Escherichia phage wv7, vB_EcoM_BECP11, vB_EcoM_UFV09, and T4.


CAM-21 was found to have dsDNA with a genome size of 166,962-bp and a total GC content of 35.49%. The phage genome was predicted to encode 265 ORFs and 11 tRNAs (Table 2). Based on the gene annotation results, 122 ORFs were predicted to be functional, while 143 ORFs were assumed to be hypothetical proteins with unknown functions (Table 3). The putative functional ORFs were classified into four groups, such as host lysis (e.g., tail lysozyme and holin), DNA replication and nucleotide metabolism (e.g., endonuclease, exonuclease, DNA and RNA polymerase, DNA primase, DNA helicase, DNA and RNA ligase, dCMP deaminase, dUTP diphosphatase, and dCMP hydroxymethylase), phage packaging and structure (e.g., head, outer and major capsid, neck, tail fiber, tube and sheath, baseplate hub and wedge, terminase, and fibritin proteins), and additional functions (e.g., thymidylate synthase, thymidine kinase, peptidase, and glutaredoxin) (FIG. 4). From the similarity analysis of amino acid or nucleotide sequences using all the above-mentioned databases, the results indicated that the genome of CAM-21 did not encode toxins, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, lysogeny and allergens. Based on BLASTN analysis, the gene sequence of CAM-21 showed a high homology with the Myoviridae family phages, which include Escherichia phage vB_EcoM-BECP11 (accession number MW286157; 97% query coverage, and 97% identity), vB_EcoM-UFV09 (accession number MZ291552, 95% query coverage, and 97% identity), and wV7 (accession number HM997020, 96% query coverage, and 98% identity). The classification of CAM-21 was confirmed by a phylogenetic tree analysis. Based on the complete genome, CAM-21 was clustered with Tequatrovirus genus phages, such as RB27, vB_EcoM-BECP11, wV7, vB_EcoM-UFV09, and PE37 (FIG. 5A). Based on FIG. 5B, the major capsid protein of CAM-21 was closely related to those of ten Tequatrovirus phages. For the phylogenetic study based on the large terminase subunit, CAM-21 was clustered with eight Tequatrovirus phages, such as RB51, EcNP1, KIT03, wV7, AR1, vB_EcoM-BECP11, slur04, and slur02 (FIG. 5C), indicating that these phages have a similar DNA packaging process. All references to tRNA start and Bounds end and ORF “Start” and “End” are relative to SEQ ID NO. 1.









TABLE 2







The predicted tRNA genes in the Escherichia phage CAM-21











No. of tRNA
tRNA start
Bounds end
Type of tRNA
Anti-codon














1
135677
135749
glutamine (Gln)
TTG


2
135751
135837
leucine (Leu)
TAA


3
135843
135916
glycine (Gly)
TCC


4
135927
136000
proline (Pro)
TGG


5
136003
136092
serine (Ser)
TGA


6
136098
136173
threonine (Thr)
TGT


7
136175
136249
methionine (Met)
CAT


8
136262
136348
tyrosine (Tyr)
GTA


9
136353
136427
asparagine (Asn)
GTT


10
136542
136617
histidine (His)
GTG


11
136622
136697
arginine (Arg)
TCT
















TABLE 3







gp37 and gp38 in CAM-21 & T4-like phages






















Length

Iden-











(no. of

tity


Iden-






amino
Gene
with T4
Putative
Most closely
tity
E


ORF
Strand
Start
End
acid)
name
(%)
function
related protein
(%)
value
Accession no.





















1

2
265
87
cam01_001

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
8E−60
YP_009197386.1









protein
protein










AVU02_gp198










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


2

344
901
185
55
100
RNA
RNA polymerase
100
 3E−135
YP_009197387.1









polymerase
sigma factor









sigma factor
[Escherichia










phage slur07]


3

915
1103
62
a-gt.5
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−40
YP_009290332.1









protein
protein










BIZ64_gp066










[Escherichia










phage vB_EcoM-










UFV13]


4

1105
1422
105
a-gt.4
99
hypothetical
a-gt.4 family
99
5E−65
YP_009167875.1









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


5

1598
1771
57
a-gt.2
91
hypothetical
hypothetical
97
2E−33
YP_009102267.1









protein
protein RB27_062










[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


6

1838
3040
400
a-gt
91
alpha-
DNA alpha-
100
 7E−304
YP_009197391.1









glucosyl-
glucosyltransferase









transferase
[Escherichia










phage slur07]


7

3217
4236
339
47
99
metallo-
metallopho-
100
 4E−258
YP_009284129.1









phosphoesterase
sphoesterase










[Escherichia










phage HY03]


8

4233
4496
87
46.2
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−64
YP_009180833.1









protein
protein










AS348_gp078










[Escherichia










phage slur14]


9

4477
4683
68
46.1
100
hypothetical
DUF5487 family
100
6E−46
YP_009197394.1









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


10

4722
6362
546
46
95
recombination-
endonuclease
97
0E+00
YP_002854390.1









related
subunit [E. virus









endonuclease
RB14]


11

6418
6606
62
45.2
100
hypothetical
gp45.2
100
2E−41
YP_002854389.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


12

6616
7005
129
rpbA
98
RNA
RNA polymerase
100
2E−90
YP_007004796.1









polymerase-
binding protein









binding protein
[Escherichia










phage wV7]


13

7061
7747
228
45
100
sliding clamp
gp45 sliding
100
 2E−159
YP_009197398.1










clamp DNA










polymerase










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


14

7799
8758
319
44
100
DNA polymerase
clamp loader,
100
 1E−234
YP_002854386.1









clamp loader
small subunit [E.









subunit
virus RB14]


15

8760
9323
187
62
99
DNA polymerase
DNA polymerase
100
 6E−134
YP_002854385.1









clamp loader
clamp loader









subunit
subunit A [E. virus










RB14]


16

9325
9693
122
regA
100
translational
translational
100
3E−89
YP_009210240.1









repressor
repressor RegA










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


17

9695
9916
73
cam01_017

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−46
YP_002854383.1









protein
protein [E. virus










RB14]


18

9995
12691
898
43
100
DNA
DNA polymerase
100
0E+00
YP_007004790.1









polymerase
[Escherichia










phage wV7]


19

12875
13111
78
cam01_019

hypothetical
hypothetical
97
2E−46
YP_009167860.1









protein
protein AR1_049










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


20

13122
13502
126
imm.1
97
hypothetical
membrane
98
4E−89
YP_009965537.1









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage CF2]


21

13510
13761
83
imm
99
superinfection
superinfection
100
1E−51
YP_009197406.1









immunity
immunity protein









protein
[Escherichia










phage slur07]


22

13915
14655
246
42
97
dCMP
dCMP
100
 4E−186
YP_009102249.1









hydroxymethylase
hydroxymethylase










[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


23

14652
15494
280
cam01_023

hypothetical
beta-glucosyl-
99
 2E−208
YP_009167855.1









protein
HMC-alpha-










glucosyl-










transferase










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


24

15572
16753
393
uvsX
91
RecA-like
RecA-like
100
 6E−283
YP_009210233.1









recombination
recombination









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


25

16746
17090
114
40
100
head vertex
gp40 head vertex
100
6E−74
YP_009210232.1









assembly
assembly









chaperone
chaperone










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


26

17100
18527
475
41
100
DNA primase/
DNA primase-
100
0E+00
YP_009965544.1









helicase
helicase subunit










[Escherichia










phage CF2]


27

18586
18768
60
dmd
98
discriminator
discriminator
100
7E−40
YP_002854373.1









of mRNA
of mRNA









degradation
degradation [E.










virus RB14]


28

18770
19027
85
61.4
96
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
8E−59
YP_009288406.1









protein
protein










BI058_gp040










[Shigella phage










SHBML-50-1]


29

19088
19381
97
sp
93
spackle
spackle
100
3E−66
YP_009167406.1









periplasmic
periplasmic









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB68]


30

19383
20015
210
61.2
79
hypothetical
hypothetical
93
 5E−152
YP_009102241.1









protein
protein RB27_036










[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


31

20017
20373
118
61.2
35
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−82
YP_009210226.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp141










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


32

20375
20539
54
61.1
96
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−31
YP_009197417.1









protein
protein










AVU02_gp167










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


33

20542
21570
342
61
99
DNA primase
putative DNA
100
 4E−260
YP_009281373.1









subunit
primase










[Escherichia










phage UFV-










AREG1]


34
+
21567
21767
66
cam01_034

hypothetical
hypothetical
99
1E−37
YP_009197419.1









protein
protein










AVU02_gp165










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


35

21839
22357
172
56
73
dUTP
dCTP
100
 6E−127
YP_002853986.1









diphosphatase
pyrophosphatase










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


36

22357
22497
46
cam01_036

hypothetical
hypothetical
94
7E−21
YP_007004772.1









protein
protein










F412_gp244










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


37

22539
22775
78
soc
54
small outer
capsid and
100
6E−53
YP_009279024.1









capsid protein
scaffold protein










[Shigella phage










SHFML-26]


38

22874
23080
68
mrh.2
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
6E−46
YP_009197424.1









protein
protein










AVU02_gp160










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


39

23080
23421
113
mrh.1
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
1E−73
YP_009167840.1









protein
protein AR1_029










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


40

23430
23915
160
mrh
91
transcription
transcription
91
 4E−101
NP_049641.1









modulator
modulator under










heat shock [E.










virus T4]


41

23938
24093
51
srh
100
transcription
transcription
100
4E−29
YP_006986574.1









modulator
modulator










[Escherichia










phage










vB_EcoM_ACG-










C40]


42

24090
24254
54
modA.4
94
hypothetical
hypothetical
98
8E−32
YP_002853980.1









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


43

24247
24717
156
modA.3
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
98
 1E−109
YP_007004405.1









protein
protein










F413_gp217










[Escherichia










phage ime09]


44

24726
24908
60
modA.2
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
5E−40
YP_009210213.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp128










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


45

24976
25599
207
modB
95
ADP-
NAD-protein
99
 1E−145
YP_009277663.1









ribosylase
ADP-










ribosyltransferase










modA [Shigella










phage SHFML-










11]


46

25596
26198
200
modA
97
ADP-
putative ADP-
99
 4E−143
YP_009148470.1









ribosylase
ribosylase










[Escherichia










phage HY011


47

26315
27061
248
srd
99
anti-sigma
anti-sigma factor
100
 1E−174
YP_009965566.1









factor
[Escherichia










phage CF2]


48

27063
27374
103
dda.1
92
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−73
YP_007004760.1









protein
protein










F412_gp256










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


49

27371
28690
439
dda
98
DNA helicase
DNA helicase
100
0E+00
YP_009625233.1










[Escherichia










phage slur03]


50

28697
28957
86
cam01_050

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
5E−56
YP_009619221.1









protein
protein










FDJ03_gp141










[Shigella phage










Sf24]


51

28944
29189
81
dexA.2
91
hypothetical
dextranase
98
4E−51
YP_009210207.1









protein
[Escherichia










phage slur02]


52

29182
29424
80
dexA.1
93
hypothetical
hypothetical
96
1E−50
YP_009098401.1









protein
protein RB3_015










[Escherichia










phage RB3]


53

29424
30107
227
dexA
100
3′-5′
exonuclease [E.
100
 5E−171
NP_049629.1









exoribonuclease
virus T4]


54

30171
30674
167
motB.2
91
hypothetical
hypothetical
98
 1E−122
YP_009614935.1









protein
protein [Shigella










phage Sf22]


55

30687
31181
164
motB.1
38
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
 2E−119
YP_009608391.1









protein
protein










FDJ03_gp136










[Shigella phage










Sf24]


56

31254
31727
157
motB
46
modifier of
modifier of
99
 2E−108
YP_009098397.1









transcription
transcription










[Escherichia










phage RB3]


57

31737
32156
139
motB
37
modifier of
modifier of
100
1E−98
YP 009098396.1









transcription
transcription










[Escherichia










phage RB3]


58

32264
32533
89
cam01_058

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
4E−61
YP_007004391.1









protein
protein










F413_gp267










[Escherichia










phage ime09]


59

32547
32762
71
cef
97
modifier of
modifier of
100
9E−50
YP_002853963.1









supressor
suppressor T4









tRNAs
tRNAs










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


60

32762
33187
141
goF
84
mRNA
mRNA
99
2E−92
YP_009167376.1









metabolism
metabolism









modulator
moderator










[Enterobacteria










phage RB68]


61

33190
33366
58
39.2
70
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
9E−42
YP_007004748.1









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


62

33369
33743
124
cam01_062

hypothetical
hypothetical
99
1E−82
YP_007004747.1









protein
protein










F412_gp269










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


63

33740
34009
89
39.1
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
2E−60
YP_009167816.1









protein
protein AR1_004










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


64

34079
35896
605
39
98
DNA
DNA
100
0E+00
YP_009618817.1









topoisomerase
topoisomerase II









II large
[Shigella phage









subunit
Sf21]


65

35951
36154
67
rllA.1
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−41
YP_009625491.1









protein
protein










FDJ55_gp132










[Escherichia










phage slur04]


66

36165
38342
725
rllA
98
protects from
rllA protein
100
0E+00
YP_007004743.1









prophage-
[Escherichia









induced early
phage wV7]









lysis


67

38354
39292
312
rllB
99
helix-turn-
helix-turn-helix
99
 4E−227
YP_009149516.1









helix domain-
domain-









containing
containing protein









protein
[Yersinia phage










phiD1]


68

39321
39515
64
denB.1
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−37
YP_009098658.1









protein
protein RB3_272










[Escherichia










phage RB3]


69

39552
39881
109
cam01_069

hypothetical
hypothetical
99
3E−77
YP_007004648.1









protein
protein










F413_gp235










[Escherichia










phage ime09]


70

39895
40371
158
denB
99
DNA
endonuclease IV
100
 4E−120
YP_009168090.1









endonuclease
[Escherichia









IV
phage AR1]


71

40452
40658
68
cam01_071

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
7E−41
YP_002854606.1









protein
protein [E. virus










RB14]


72

40770
40868
32
ndd.5
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
9E−17
YP_009290530.1









protein
protein










BIZ64_gp264










[Escherichia










phage vB_EcoM-










UFV13]


73

40934
41047
37
ndd.4
92
hypothetical
ndd.4
97
2E−15
YP_002854603.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


74

41055
41252
65
ndd.2a
100
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−39
YP_803205.1









protein
protein










RB32ORF263c










[E. virus RB32]


75

41249
41359
35
ndd.2
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
7E−21
YP_009197459.1









protein
protein










AVU02_gp125










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


76

41368
41583
71
ndd.1
97
hypothetical
ndd. 1
100
1E−46
YP_002854600.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


77

41644
42102
152
ndd
98
Nucleoid
naphthalene 1,2-
99
 2E−109
YP_009102737.1









disruption
dioxygenase









protein
[Escherichia










phage ECML-










134]


78

42190
42342
50
cam01_078

hypothetical
acridine
96
8E−28
YP_007005004.1









protein
resistance protein










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


79

42480
43808
442
52
100
DNA
DNA
100
0E+00
YP_009210181.1









topoisomerase
topisomerase II









II medium
medium subunit









subunit
[Escherichia










phage slur02]


80

43805
43954
49
motA.1
100
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−23
YP_009210180.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp095










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


81

44084
44719
211
motA
98
flagellar
activator of
100
 1E−144
YP_009281594.1









motor protein
middle period










transcription










[Escherichia










phage UFV-










AREG1]


82

44730
45059
109
arn.4
100
hypothetical
arn.4 hypothetical
100
3E−78
YP_002854592.1









protein
protein [E. virus










RB14]


83

45056
45517
153
arn.3
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
 1E−112
YP_009619063.1









protein
protein










FDJ02_gp149










[Shigella phage










Sf21]


84

45517
45813
98
arn.2
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−69
YP_009619062.1









protein
protein










FDJ02_gp150










[Shigella phage










Sf21]


85

45884
46015
43
arn.1
98
hypothetical
arn.1 hypothetical
100
4E−28
YP_002854588.1









protein
protein [E. virus










RB14]


86

46099
46377
92
arn
98
inhibitor of
inhibitor of MrcBC
100
3E−61
YP_009965608.1









MrcBC
restriction









restriction
endonuclease









endonuclease
[Escherichia










phage CF2]


87

46374
46526
50
asiA.1
94
hypothetical
anti-sigma factor
98
7E−27
YP_009288615.1









protein
[Shigella phage










SHBML-50-1]


88

46539
46811
90
asiA
100
anti-sigma 70
asiA anti-sigma
100
7E−58
YP_009210171.1









protein
70 protein










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


89
+
46812
47468
218
t
98
holin lysis
holin [E. virus
100
 6E−157
YP_803187.1









mediator
RB32]


90
+
47501
48277
258
38

tail fiber
receptor-
99
 2E−178
YP_010070631.1









adhesin
recognizing protein










[Escherichia










phage










vB_EcoM_G4507]


91
+
48309
51620
1103
37
35
long tail fiber,
long tail fiber
97
0E+00
YP_010076447.1









large distal
subunit, distal









subunit
[Shigella phage










Sf23]


92
+
51629
52285
218
36
79
hinge
hinge connector
99
 4E−157
YP_009168068.1









connector of
of long tail fiber









long tail fiber,
distal connector









distal
[Escherichia









connector
phage AR1]


93
+
52348
53463
371
35
97
hinge
hinge connector
100
 2E−265
YP_009167615.1









connector of
of long tail fiber,









long tail fiber,
proximal









proximal
[Enterobacteria









connector
phage RB68]


94
+
53472
57341
1289
34
93
long tail fiber,
long tail fiber,
100
0E+00
YP_002854200.1









proximal
proximal subunit









subunit
[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


95

57446
58363
305
rnh
100
Rnase H
ribonuclease H
100
 2E−225
YP_009290507.1










[Escherichia










phage vB_EcoM-










UFV13]


96

58372
58641
89
dsbA
100
double-
double-stranded
100
3E−58
NP_049858.1









stranded
DNA binding









DNA binding
protein [E. virus









protein
T4]


97

58619
58957
112
33
98
late promoter
late promoter
100
6E−73
YP_009102443.1









transcription
transcription









accessory
accessory protein









protein
[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


98

58954
59607
217
59
99
DNA helicase
DNA helicase
100
 2E−154
YP_009281576.1









loader
loader and










ssDNA binding










[Escherichia










phage UFV-










AREG1]


99

59707
60615
302
32
99
single-
single-stranded
100
 6E−219
YP_007004981.1









stranded
DNA-binding









DNA binding
protein









protein
[Escherichia










phage wV7]


100

60761
60991
76
frd.3
87
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
8E−53
YP_009210159.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp074










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


101

61039
61425
128
frd.2
45
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
4E−92
YP_007004979.1









protein
protein










F412_gp037










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


102

61427
61687
86
cam01_102

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−57
YP_009168058.1









protein
protein AR1_247










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


103

61829
62071
80
frd.1
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
4E−59
YP_009168057.1









protein
protein AR1_246










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


104

62082
62441
119
cam01_104

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
8E−84
YP_009168056.1









protein
protein AR1_245










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


105

62438
62683
81
cam01_105

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−57
YP_009168055.1









protein
protein AR1_244










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


106

62683
63264
193
frd
96
dihydrofolate
dihydrofolate
100
 2E−139
YP_007004974.1









reductase
reductase










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


107

63284
63631
115
cam01_107

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−88
YP_007004973.1









protein
protein










F412_gp043










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


108

63677
64537
286
td
94
thymidylate
dTMP
97
 7E−217
YP_009168052.1









synthase
(thymidylate)










synthase










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


109

64561
64824
87
nrdA.2
89
hypothetical
nrdA.2
100
2E−61
YP_002854185.1









protein
hypothetical










protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


110

65095
67359
754
nrdA
99
ribonucleoside-
ribonucleoside-
100
0E+00
YP_009102429.1









diphosphate
diphosphate









reductase
reductase subunit









subunit alpha
alpha










[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


111

67411
68589
392
nrdB
90
ribonucleoside-
ribonucleoside-
100
 3E−293
YP_009619035.1









diphosphate
diphosphate









reductase
reductase, small









subunit beta
subunit [Shigella










phage Sf21]


112

68617
69027
136
denA
99
endonuclease
endonuclease II
100
4E−96
YP_009210146.1









II
[Escherichia










phage slur02]


113

69080
70204
374
rnlA
99
RNA ligase
RNA ligase 1 and
100
 5E−279
YP_007004966.1










tail fiber










attachment










catalyst










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


114

70266
70772
168
alc
98
inhibitor of
alc inhibitor of
100
 1E−117
YP_009168045.1









host
host transcription









transcription
[Escherichia










phage AR1]


115

70763
71116
117
pseT.3
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−72
YP_009168044.1









protein
protein AR1_233










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


116

71113
71412
99
pseT.2
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−70
YP_009168043.1









protein
protein AR1_232










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


117

71409
71639
76
pseT.1
99
hypothetical
pseT.1
100
7E−51
YP_002854556.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


118

71636
71938
100
cam01_118

hypothetical
hypothetical
99
6E−66
YP_007004961.1









protein
protein










F412_gp055










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


119

71935
72840
301
pseT
91
polynucleotide
polynucleotide
96
 3E−223
YP_009619027.1









kinase
kinase [Shigella










phage Sf21]


120

72840
73037
65
cd.5
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−44
YP_009102691.1









protein
protein










ECML134_216










[Escherichia










phage ECML-










134]


121

73030
73230
66
cd.4
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−46
YP_009168038.1









protein
protein AR1_227










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


122

73233
73508
91
cd.3
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−58
YP_009197239.1









protein
protein










AVU02_gp043










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


123

73571
74098
175
cam01_123

hypothetical
hypothetical
99
 4E−126
YP_009098600.1









protein
protein RB3_214










[Escherichia










phage RB3]


124

74092
74328
78
cd.2
94
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−49
YP_009210134.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp049










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


125

74325
74663
112
cd.1
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−74
YP_007004955.1









protein
protein










F412_gp061










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


126

74660
75241
193
cd
99
dCMP
dCMP deaminase
100
 3E−144
YP_009168033.1









deaminase
[Escherichia










phage AR1]


127

75241
75477
78
31.2
95
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
2E−51
YP_009180711.1









protein
protein










AS348_gp200










[Escherichia










phage slur14]


128

75478
75786
102
31.1
98
SH3 beta-
phage tail fiber
99
8E−67
YP_007004586.1









barrel fold-
protein









containing
[Escherichia









protein
phage ime09]


129

75843
76178
111
31
100
head
co-chaperone
100
3E−79
YP_009197246.1









assembly co-
GroES









chaperone
[Escherichia









GroES
phage slur07]









protein


130

76326
76574
82
rllI
100
lysis inhibition
lysis inhibition
100
4E−53
YP_002854543.1









accessory protein
accessory protein










[E. virus RB14]


131

76818
76994
58
30.9
100
hypothetical
gp30.9 conserved
100
4E−32
NP_049823.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










T4]


132

77105
77437
110
30.8
97
hypothetical
gp30.8
99
7E−78
YP_002854541.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


133

77506
77871
121
30.7
99
hypothetical
gp30.7
100
1E−90
YP_002854161.1









protein
hypothetical










protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


134

77912
78199
95
30.6
98
hypothetical
gp30.6
100
6E−66
YP_002854539.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


135

78199
78396
65
30.5
98
hypothetical
gp30.5
100
7E−44
YP_002854538.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


136

78393
78599
67
30.4
96
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
8E−49
YP_007004943.1









protein
protein










F412_gp073










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


137

78592
79050
152
30.3
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
98
 9E−108
YP_009281534.1









protein
protein










BI043_gp194










[Escherichia










phage UFV-










AREG1]


138

79047
79883
278
30.2
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
 4E−216
YP_007004941.1









protein
protein










F412_gp075










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


139

79883
80152
89
30.1
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−64
YP_007004940.1









protein
protein










F412_gp076










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


140

80149
81612
487
30
98
DNA ligase
DNA ligase
100
0E+00
YP_009281531.1










[Escherichia










phage UFV-










AREG1]


141

81609
81794
61
alt.1
77
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−38
YP_009281530.1









protein
protein










BI043_gp190










[Escherichia










phage UFV-










AREG1]


142

81851
83944
697
alt
71
RNA polymerase-
ADP-
100
0E+00
YP_002854531.1









ADP-
ribosyltransferase









ribosyltransferase
[E. virus RB14]


143

83948
86005
685
alt.-1
95
RNA
RNA polymerase-
99
0E+00
YP_009288560.1









polymerase-
ADP-









ADP-
ribosyltransferase









ribosyltransferase
[Shigella phage










SHBML-50-1]


144

86066
86356
96
alt.-3
97
hypothetical
alt.-3 hypothetical
100
1E−62
YP_002854150.1









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


145
+
86385
87350
321
54
98
baseplate
baseplate tail
100
 1E−217
YP_009168010.1









subunit
tube initiator










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


146
+
87350
88444
364
48
95
baseplate
baseplate tail
100
 2E−248
YP_009168009.1









tail-tube
tube cap









junction
[Escherichia









protein
phage AR1]


147
+
88453
90225
590
29
96
baseplate
baseplate hub
99
0E+00
YP_009168008.1









hub subunit
subunit/tail length










determinator










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


148
+
90222
90680
152
28
99
baseplate
baseplate distal
100
 8E−111
YP_009167560.1









distal hub
hub subunit









subunit
[Enterobacteria










phage RB68]


149
+
90703
91875
390
27
98
baseplate
baseplate hub
100
 4E−288
YP_009168006.1









hub subunit
subunit










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


150
+
91872
92624
250
51
94
baseplate
baseplate hub
100
 5E−185
YP_009168005.1









hub assembly
assembly catalyst









protein
[Escherichia










phage AR1]


151

92675
93301
208
26
99
baseplate
baseplate hub
100
 1E−154
YP_009168004.1









hub subunit
subunit










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


152

93301
93699
132
25
100
baseplate
baseplate wedge
100
7E−91
YP_006986742.1









wedge
subunit









subunit
[Escherichia










phage










vB_EcoM_ACG-










C40]


153

93766
94179
137
uvsY
99
recombination,
recombination
100
1E−93
YP_009210105.1









repair and
mediator protein









ssDNA
UvsY









binding protein
[Escherichia










phage slur02]


154

94179
94406
75
uvsY.-1
100
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
4E−53
YP_009030792.1









protein
protein e112_195










[Escherichia










phage










vB_EcoM_112]


155

94530
94697
55
uvsY.-2
100
hypothetical
DUF2685
100
2E−35
NP_049797.1









protein
domain-










containing protein










[E. virus T4]


156
+
94753
94986
77
uvsW.1
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
4E−46
YP_007004923.1









protein
protein










F412_gp093










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


157
+
95012
96523
503
uvsW
99
DNA helicase
DNA helicase,
100
0E+00
YP_009965402.1










phage-associated










[Escherichia










phage CF2]


158

96574
97254
226
inh
99
minor capsid
inhibitor of
100
 3E−158
YP_009290447.1









protein
prohead protease









inhibitor of
[Escherichia









prohead
phage vB_EcoM-









protease
UFV13]


159

97264
98682
472
hoc
77
outer capsid
outer capsid
93
 1E−303
YP_009167995.1









protein
protein Hoc










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


160

98784
98987
67
24.3
84
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
9E−41
YP_009625072.1









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage slur03]


161

98974
99252
92
24.2
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−64
YP_009210096.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp011










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


162

99262
100269
335
rnlB
82
RNA ligase
RNA ligase
100
 2E−245
YP_009278901.1










[Shigella phage










SHFML-26]


163
+
100299
101582
427
24
99
capsid vertex
precursor of head
100
 4E−305
YP_009098559.1









protein
vertex subunit










[Escherichia










phage RB31


164
+
101666
103231
521
23
96
major capsid
major capsid
100
0E+00
YP_009288539.1









protein
protein [Shigella










phage SHBML-










50-1]


165
+
103250
104059
269
22
98
prohead core
major prohead-
100
 1E−152
YP_009167988.1









scaffolding
scaffolding core









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


166
+
104090
104728
212
21
100
prohead core
prohead core
100
 1E−155
YP_009210091.1









scaffolding
scaffolding









protein and
protein and









protease
protease










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


167
+
104728
105153
141
68
98
prohead core
prohead core
100
2E−88
YP_009167986.1









protein
protein precursor










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


168
+
105153
105392
51
67
95
prohead core
prohead core
98
2E−27
YP_009167985.1









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


169
+
105392
106966
524
20
100
portal vertex
portal protein [E.
100
0E+00
NP_049782.1









of the head
virus T4]


170
+
107050
107541
163
19
100
tail tube
tail protein [E.
100
 9E−120
NP_049781.1









protein
virus T4]


171
+
107658
109637
659
18
98
tail sheath
tail sheath protein
100
0E+00
YP_007004908.1









protein
[Escherichia










phage wV7]


172
+
109669
111501
610
17
99
large
putative
100
0E+00
YP_009197290.1









terminase
terminase subunit









protein
nuclease and










ATPase










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


173
+
111485
111979
164
16
100
small
small terminase
100
 1E−116
YP_009197291.1









terminase
protein









protein
[Escherichia










phage slur07]


174
+
111988
112806
272
15
99
tail sheath
tail sheath
100
 3E−203
YP_002854120.1









stabilizer and
stabilizer and









completion
completion









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


175
+
112848
113618
256
14
98
neck protein
neck protein
100
 9E−191
YP_009167978.1










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


176
+
113620
114549
309
13
98
neck protein
neck protein
100
 9E−236
YP_009167977.1










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


177
+
114581
116038
485
wac
82
fibritin protein
fibritin neck
100
0E+00
YP_007004902.1










whiskers










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


178
+
116048
117598
516
12
64
short tail fiber
putative short tail
100
0E+00
YP_009281494.1









protein
fiber [Escherichia










phage UFV-










AREG1]


179
+
117595
118254
219
11
67
baseplate
baseplate wedge
100
 3E−157
YP_007004900.1









wedge
subunit and tail









subunit and
pin [Escherichia









tail pin
phage wV7]


180
+
118254
120059
601
10
86
baseplate
baseplate wedge
99
0E+00
YP_007004899.1









wedge
subunit and tail









subunit and
pin [Escherichia









tail pin
phage wV7]


181
+
120059
120925
288
9
100
baseplate
baseplate wedge
100
 7E−202
YP_002854113.1









wedge tail
tail fiber









fiber
connector









connector
[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


182
+
120989
121993
334
8
100
baseplate
baseplate wedge
100
 4E−261
YP_002854112.1









wedge
subunit









subunit
[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


183
+
121986
125084
1032
7
98
baseplate
baseplate wedge
99
0E+00
YP_007004896.1









wedge
initiator









initiator
[Escherichia










phage wV7]


184
+
125081
127063
660
6
99
baseplate
baseplate wedge
100
0E+00
YP_007004895.1









wedge
subunit









subunit
[Escherichia










phage wV7]


185
+
127072
127365
97
5.4
100
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−68
NP_049763.1









protein
protein [E. virus










T4]


186
+
127366
127860
164
5.1
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
 2E−107
YP_009102355.1









protein
protein RB27_150










[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


187
+
127895
129622
575
5
99
baseplate
putative
100
0E+00
YP_004415044.1









hub subunit
baseplate hub









and tail
subunit and tail









lysozyme
lysozyme










[Shigella phage










Shfl2]


188
+
129606
130196
196
53
99
baseplate
baseplate wedge
100
 1E−146
YP_009167965.1









wedge
subunit









subunit
[Escherichia










phage AR1]


189

130244
130696
150
4
100
head
head completion
100
 4E−114
NP_049755.1









completion
protein [E. virus









protein
T4]


190

130696
131523
275
2
99
DNA end
DNA end
100
 3E−200
YP_803089.1









protector
protector protein









protein
[E. virus RB32]


191

131520
132179
219
mobB
45
homing
HNH
100
 1E−164
YP_803088.1









endonuclease
endonuclease [E.










virus RB32]


192

132286
132816
176
3
100
tail sheath
tail protein [E.
100
 3E−127
NP_049753.1









stabilizer and
virus T4]









completion









protein


193

132866
133591
241
1
98
deoxynucleoside
dNMP kinase
100
 1E−175
YP_009030752.1









monophosphate
[Escherichia









kinase
phage










vB_EcoM_112]


194

133591
133833
80
57A
98
chaperone for
chaperone for tail
99
3E−45
YP_007004886.1









tail fiber
fiber formation









formation
[Escherichia










phage wV7]


195

133833
134288
151
57B
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
 4E−109
NP_049750.1









protein
protein [E. virus










T4]


196

134361
134645
94
ipl
91
internal head
hypothetical
100
4E−59
YP_009149385.1









protein
protein BN81_146










[Yersinia phage










phiD1]


197

134722
134907
61
trna.4
100
hypothetical
trna.4 conserved
100
3E−34
NP_049748.1









protein
hypothetical










predicted










membrane










protein [E. virus










T4]


198

134909
135289
126
trna.3
57
hypothetical
hypothetical
98
9E−93
YP_009619345.1









protein
protein










FDJ03_gp269










[Shigella phage










Sf24]


199

135292
135579
95
trna.2
95
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
3E−67
YP_009210326.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp266










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


200

136716
137066
116
cam01_200

hypothetical
hypothetical
99
5E−83
YP_009148578.1









protein
protein










ACQ54_gp127










[Escherichia










phage HY01]


201

137448
137921
157
cam01_201

hypothetical
hypothetical
99
 2E−102
YP_002854093.1









protein
protein










RB51ORF140










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


202

138163
138426
87
e.8
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−62
YP_009210323.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp238










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


203

138483
139001
172
cam01_203

hypothetical
hypothetical
98
 5E−122
YP_002854091.1









protein
protein










RB51ORF138










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


204

139044
139637
197
e.6
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
 3E−126
YP_009149376.1









protein
protein BN81_137










[Yersinia phage










phiD1]


205

139679
140287
202
e.5
93
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
 6E−146
YP_007004875.1









protein
protein










F412_gp141










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


206

140630
141004
124
e.3
84
hypothetical
e.3 hypothetical
100
1E−77
YP_002854087.1









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


207

141001
141489
162
e.2
87
hypothetical
e.2 hypothetical
100
 7E−121
YP_002854086.1









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


208

141486
141926
146
nudE
95
nudix
nudix hydrolase
99
 3E−107
YP_009965455.1









hydrolase
[Escherichia










phage CF21


209

141963
142457
164
e
97
glycoside
glycoside
100
 2E−117
YP_009210314.1









hydrolase
hydrolase family









family protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


210

142546
143019
157
cam01_210

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
 3E−111
YP_006986677.1









protein
protein










D862_gp151










[Escherichia










phage










vB_EcoM_ACG-










C40]


211

143161
143703
180
vs.8
87
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
 2E−132
YP_006986676.1









protein
protein










D862_gp152










[Escherichia










phage










vB_EcoM_ACG-










C40]


212

143700
144029
109
vs.7
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
6E−79
YP_007004866.1









protein
protein










F412_gp150










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


213

144037
144399
120
vs.6
98
hypothetical
autonomous
100
2E−83
YP_009625128.1









protein
glycyl radical










cofactor GrcA










[Escherichia










phage slur03]


214

144399
144620
73
vs.5
94
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−51
YP_009277495.1









protein
protein










BH804_gp025










[Shigella phage










SHFML-11]


215

144613
144879
88
vs.4
93
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
6E−60
YP_009625130.1









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage slur03]


216

144879
145157
92
vs.3
97
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−58
YP_009210305.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp220










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


217

145217
145678
153
regB
99
site-specific
site-specific RNA
100
 4E−109
YP_009167930.1









RNA
endonuclease









endonuclease
[Escherichia










phage AR1]


218

145686
146231
181
vs.1
100
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
 1E−130
NP_049725.1









protein
protein [E. virus










T4]


219

146224
146565
113
vs
97
valyl-tRNA
valyl-tRNA
100
6E−78
YP_009965467.1









synthetase
synthetase









modifier
modifier










[Escherichia










phage CF2]


220

146562
147041
159
tk.4
57
hypothetical
hypothetical
98
 3E−118
YP_009614768.1









protein
protein gp16










[Shigella phage










Sf22]


221

147222
147428
68
cam01_221

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−52
YP_009197343.1









protein
protein










AVU02_gp241










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


222

147425
147610
57
cam01_222

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
6E−34
YP_009167483.1









protein
protein RB68_114










[Enterobacteria










phage RB68]


223

147597
147782
61
tk.2
54
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−38
YP_009210297.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp212










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


224

147792
148373
193
tk
99
thymidine
thymidine kinase
100
 1E−138
YP_009210296.1









kinase
[Escherichia










phage slur02]


225

148416
148628
70
rl.1
100
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
7E−42
YP_009210295.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp210










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


226

148641
148934
97
rl
98
lysis inhibition
lysis inhibition
100
6E−66
YP_009098495.1









regulator,
regulator









membrane
membrane









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage RB3]


227

148931
149317
128
rl.-1
100
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−89
NP_049716.1









protein
protein [E. virus










T4]


228

149413
149601
62
mobD.5
100
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
8E−40
NP_049715.1









protein
protein [E. virus










T4]


229

149601
149804
66
mobD.4
74
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
7E−41
YP_002854062.1









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


230

149807
150001
64
mobD.3
94
hypothetical
hypothetical
97
4E−40
YP_009210290.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp205










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


231

149991
150164
57
mobD.2a
89
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
6E−35
YP_002854060.1









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


232

150225
150329
34
mobD.2
91
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−16
YP_002854059.1









protein
protein










[Enterobacteria










phage RB51]


233

150329
150514
61
cam01_233

hypothetical
hypothetical
97
5E−36
YP_009030707.1









protein
protein e112_102










[Escherichia










phage










vB_EcoM_112]


234

150516
151058
180
mobD.1
46
hypothetical
hypothetical
98
 5E−123
YP_009030706.1









protein
protein e112_101










[Escherichia










phage










vB_EcoM_112]


235

151065
151586
173
cam01_235

hypothetical
hypothetical
98
 3E−120
YP_007004840.1









protein
protein










F412_gp176










[Escherichia










phage wV7]


236

151589
152050
153
cam01_236

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
 2E−109
YP_007004479.1









protein
protein










[Escherichia










phage ime09]


237

152050
153060
336
nrdC.11
96
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
 3E−252
YP_007004478.1









protein
protein










F413_gp153










[Escherichia










phage ime09]


238

153178
154146
322
nrdC.10
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
 2E−234
YP_009210283.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp198










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


239

154248
154550
100
nrdC.9
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
1E−71
YP_009102301.1









protein
protein RB27_096










[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


240

154611
155138
175
nrdC.8
99
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
 3E−119
YP_009210281.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp196










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


241

155194
155601
135
nrdC.7
92
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
3E−93
YP_009210280.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp195










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


242

155609
156496
295
nrdC.6
98
hypothetical
nrdC.6
98
 3E−210
YP_002854426.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


243

156505
157524
339
nrdC.5
96
hypothetical
hypothetical
98
 3E−243
YP_009197365.1









protein
protein










AVU02_gp219










[Escherichia










phage slur07]


244

157552
158583
343
nrdC.4
88
hypothetical
hypothetical
97
 2E−239
YP_009167902.1









protein
protein AR1_091










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


245

158635
159564
309
nrdC.3
60
hypothetical
nrdC.3
99
 8E−223
YP_002854423.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


246

159561
159950
129
nrdC.2
78
hypothetical
nrdC.2
99
1E−93
YP_002854422.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










RB14]


247

159953
160195
80
nrdC.1
99
hypothetical
nrdC.1 conserved
99
1E−51
NP_049699.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










T4]


248

160197
160460
87
nrdC
100
thioredoxin
nrdC thioredoxin
100
7E−63
NP_049698.1










[E. virus T4]


249

160457
160672
71
cam01_249

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
3E−48
YP 009210272.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp187










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


250

160651
160845
64
cam01_250

hypothetical
hypothetical
95
1E−38
YP_009284107.1









protein
protein










BI016_gp112










[Escherichia










phage HY03]


251

160968
161453
161
pin
96
peptidase
host protease
99
 8E−118
YP_009167893.1










inhibitor










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


252

161490
161666
58
cam01_252

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
8E−40
YP_803020.1









protein
protein










RB32ORF078c










[E. virus RB32]


253

161708
162181
157
49
100
recombination
recombination
100
 1E−115
NP_049692.1









endonuclease
endonuclease VII









VII
[E. virus T4]


254

162178
163995
605
nrdD
100
anaerobic
anaerobic
100
0E+00
YP_002854413.1









ribonucleoside
ribonucleotide









triphosphate
reductase, large









reductase,
subunit [E. virus









large subunit
RB14]


255

163992
164462
156
nrdG
79
anaerobic
nrdG anaerobic
99
 2E−125
YP_009167890.1









ribonucleoside
NTP reductase,









triphosphate
small subunit









reductase,
[Escherichia









activating
phage AR1]









protein


256

164455
164568
37
cam01_256

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−22
YP_009290343.1









protein
protein










BIZ64_gp077










[Escherichia










phage vB_EcoM-










UFV13]


257

164578
164793
71
55.8
93
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
2E−40
YP_009167889.1









protein
protein AR1_078










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


258

164796
165107
103
cam01_258

hypothetical
hypothetical
100
8E−76
YP_009167888.1









protein
protein AR1_077










[Escherichia










phage AR1]


259

165079
165402
107
nrdH
99
glutaredoxin
glutaredoxin
100
5E−75
YP_009210263.1










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


260

165561
165737
58
55.6
71
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
7E−37
YP_009102278.1









protein
protein RB27_073










[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


261

165730
166023
97
55.5
99
hypothetical
gp55.5 conserved
99
8E−67
NP_049684.1









protein
protein of










unknown function










[E. virus T4]


262

166031
166162
43
55.4
98
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
4E−28
YP_009102276.1









protein
protein RB27_071










[Enterobacteria










phage RB27]


263

166163
166363
66
55.3
74
hypothetical
hypothetical
99
3E−44
YP_009210259.1









protein
protein










AVU04_gp174










[Escherichia










phage slur02]


264

166417
166743
108
55.2
100
hypothetical
gp55.2
100
9E−71
NP_049681.1









protein
hypothetical










protein [E. virus










T4]


265

166746
166961
71
55.1
94
hypothetical
hypothetical
100
7E−47
YP_009618879.1









protein
protein










FDJ02_gp065










[Shigella phage










Sf21]









To evaluate the novelty of CAM-21, its phage DNA genome was compared to those of Tequatrovirus phages, such as wV7, vB_EcoM-BECP11, vB_EcoM-UFV09 and T4 (FIG. 6). The gene sequence of CAM-21 showed a conserved gene alignment with T4-like phages, based on the genome comparison. The gene sequences encoding the tail fiber proteins, which are responsible for host recognition were found to have high similarity (>80% identity) between CAM-21 and the selected phages, except for phage T4. As compared with other Tequatrovirus phages above, the long tail fiber subunit (gp37_ORF91) and the tail fiber adhesin (gp38_ORF90) of CAM-21 and vB_EcoM-BECP11 revealed the highest homology, which were 94% and 96%, respectively. Interestingly, the gp37_ORF91 of CAM-21 shared an identity of 35% while the gp38_ORF90 showed no homology, as compared to those of T4 (Table 4).









TABLE 4







gp37 and gp38 in CAM-21 and T4-like Phages















Length



Length





(no. of



(no. of



amino
Gene
Putative

amino
Identity


ORF
acid)
name
function
Closely related protein
acid)
(%)
Accession no.

















91
1103
37
long tail
long tail fiber subunit,
1103
97
YP_010076447.1





fiber, large
distal [Shigella phage






text missing or illegible when filed

Sf23]






hypothetical protein
1103
97
YP 010070630.1






[Escherichia phage






vB_EcoM_G4507]






long tail fiber distal
1103
96
YP_009168069.1






subunit [Escherichia






phage AR1]






gp37 large distal tail
1103
96
YP_002854203.1






fiber subunit






[Enterobacteria phage






RB51]






long tail fiber distal
1109
95
YP_010099669.1






subunit [Escherichia






phage MLF4]






large distal long tail
1103
94
YP_010076863.1






fiber subunit [Shigella






phage SH7]






tail fibers protein
1103
94
YP_010073123.1






[Escherichia phage






PE37]






long tail fiber distal
1109
94
BBI58091.1






subunit [Shigella






phage SfPhi01]






hypothetical protein
1109
94
QQM15651.1






BECP11_00086






[Escherichia phage






vB_EcoM-BECP11]






hypothetical protein
1108
86
QWT76796.1






[Escherichia phage






vB_EcoM-UFV09]






long tail fiber distal
1114
80
YP_007004989.1






subunit [Escherichia






phage wV7]






gp37
1026
35
NP_049863.1






long tail fiber, distal






subunit [E. virus T4]


90
258
38
tail fiber
receptor-
258
99
YP_010070631.1





adhesin
recognizing protein






[Escherichia phage






vB_EcoM_G4507]






receptor-
259
98
YP_010073122.1






recognizing protein






[Escherichia phage






PE37]






receptor-
259
97
YP_009148690.1






recognizing protein






[Escherichia phage






HY01]






receptor recognition
259
97
QPP47032.1






[Shigella phage Sfk20]






receptor-
258
97
YP_010076448.1






recognizing protein






[Shigella phage Sf23]






receptor-
259
97
YP_009281584.1






recognizing protein






[Escherichia phage






UFV-AREG1]






receptor-
268
97
YP_009030861.1






recognizing protein






[Escherichia phage






vB_EcoM_112]






hypothetical protein
259
96
QQM15650.1






BECP11_00085






[Escherichia phage






vB_EcoM-BECP11]






receptor-
259
95
YP_009168070.1






recognizing protein






[Escherichia phage AR1]






tail fibers protein
264
81
QWT76795.1






[Escherichia phage






vB_EcoM-UFV09]






distal long tail fiber
264
81
YP_007004990.1






assembly catalyst






[Escherichia phage






wV7]






gp38 distal long tail
183

NP_049864.1






fiber assembly catalyst






[E. virus T4]






text missing or illegible when filed indicates data missing or illegible when filed







Example 8: Phage Application in Foods

The inhibitory effect of CAM-21 against E. coli O157:H7 strain C7927 was studied using liquid (pasteurized milk) and solid (ground beef and baby spinach) food samples, which were purchased from a local supermarket. First, the bacterial culture was transferred to fresh TSB and incubated overnight at 37° C. To obtain a bacterial culture with high purity, the overnight culture was centrifuged at 9300×g for 5 min and washed with PBS for twice. Then, the culture was inoculated at different concentrations into the food samples. All food samples were pre-plated on MacConkey sorbitol prior to inoculation and found to be negative for this organism.


For the liquid food study, 100 μL of the purified cultures (105 and 106 CFU/mL) were added to each tube containing 9.9 mL of pasteurized milk, followed by the addition of 100 μL of phage suspensions (109 PFU/mL) to give MOI values of 10,000 and 1000, respectively. SM buffer (100 μL) was used as a control. All the samples were stored in a refrigerator at 4° C. After 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h of incubation, and aliquots were collected, diluted and plated on MacConkey sorbitol agar plates. After the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37° C., total viable counts of E. coli O157:H7 were determined and expressed in log CFU/mL values. For the solid food study, 10 g of ground beef and a piece of baby spinach leaf (about 1 g) were placed in duplicate respective sterile petri plates. One hundred microliters each of 105 and 106 CFU/mL bacterial cultures were added and spread on the surface of each food sample with a sterile pipet tip. The spiked foods were left in a laminar hood for 30 min to allow for bacterial attachment. Then, a 100 μL of phage suspension (109 PFU/mL) was added to give MOI values of 10,000 and 1000, respectively. SM buffer (100 μL) was used as a control. The food samples were placed in a refrigerator at 4° C. and collected after 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h of incubations. On each sampling day, the ground beef and baby spinach samples were placed in sterile stomacher bags, followed by the addition of 90 mL and 9 mL of peptone water (0.1% (w/v)), respectively. The samples were homogenized using a Stomacher™ Circulator Model 400 (Seward, Ltd., UK). The serially-diluted homogenates were plated on MacConkey sorbitol agar plates and incubated for 24 h at 37° C. Total viable counts of the bacteria were determined and expressed in log CFU/g values.


The biocontrol effect of CAM-21 against E. coli O157:H7 was evaluated in milk (FIGS. 7A-7B), ground beef (FIGS. 7C-7D), and baby spinach (FIGS. 7E-7F). The food samples were first spiked with E. coli O157:H7 C7927 before the phage treatment. For the control group, the bacterial counts in all the foods remained almost constant after 24 h of incubation at 4° C., showing only a slight reduction of <0.4 log 10 CFU/mL at the tested MOIs. After 24 h of incubation, the bacterial counts in the treated milk samples were significantly decreased (P≤0.05) by 1.4 and 2.0 log 10 CFU/mL at MOIs of 1000 and 10,000, respectively. Also, the application of CAM-21 on ground beef and baby spinach at MOIs of 1000 decreased the bacterial counts by 1.4 and 1.3 log 10 CFU/g, respectively, after 24 h of storage. At a MOI of 10,000, the phage treatment significantly decreased (P≤ 0.05) the bacterial counts on ground beef and baby spinach by 1.3 and 1.4 log 10 CFU/g, respectively. As shown in FIGS. 7A-7F, treatment with CAM-21 at MOIs of 1000 and 10,000 significantly decreased (P≤0.05) the bacterial counts in all the refrigerated food samples at all the tested time points, as compared to those of controls.


Example 9A: Film Preparation (Soy Protein Biopolymer)

Pro-Fam® 873 isolated soy protein was sourced from Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (Decatur, IL, USA). Cellulose nanofiber (CNF) in powdered form, produced by bleaching wood pulp, was obtained from the University of Maine, and used to create a suspension. Glycerol was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Fresh raw bottom round beef and raw beef trimmings were procured from the Meat Market of the University of Missouri in Columbia, MO, USA. E. coli phage CAM-21 and various strains of E. coli O157:H7, that included C7927, 3178-85, EDL-933, 505B, and MF-1847, were acquired from the University of Missouri's Food Microbiology Lab culture collection. All bacterial strains were used to assess the antimicrobial activity of the films in both broth and beef samples, and E. coli O157:H7 strain C7927 was utilized as the host bacterium to produce the phage stock.


A film-forming solution (FFS) was created by combining 6% (w/w) soy protein isolate (SPI) and 3% (w/w) glycerol in sterile distilled water, with stirring at 800 rpm. The pH of the solution was then raised to 10.0, using a 5 M sodium hydroxide solution, and the solution heated at 85° C. for 30 min while stirring at 800 rpm. Once the solution had cooled to room temperature, 15% (w/w) CNF was added based on the dry weight of SPI. The mixture was stirred for 15 min. Next, 1%, 2%, or 4% (v/w) of CAM-21 was added to the FFS based on its weight, and the solution was gently stirred for 15 min. The film preparation involved using a sterile square-shaped 12 cm2 petri dish and a solution-casting technique. The films were dried at 30° C. for 48 h. The experimental setup included different film samples: one SPIfilm with 1% CAM-21 (SC1), one SPI film with 2% CAM-21 (SC2), and one SPI film with 4% CAM-21 (SC4). Additionally, a control film(S) sample did not contain CAM-21.


Example 9B: Film Preparation (Carbohydrate Biopolymers)

Carbohydrate biopolymers and additives, including carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (CMCS), sodium alginate (SA), gelatin and pullulan (PuI) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). To prepare polymer solutions, these biopolymers were dissolved in deionized water, and glycerol (2% v/v) and Tween 80 (0.01 v/v) were added. Glycerol serves as a plasticizer to increase the flexibility of the films, while Tween 80 functions as an emulsifier, stabilizing the mixture. The solutions were stirred continuously at 80° C. for 18 h to ensure full dissolution and homogeneous distribution of all components.


CAM-21 phage, at a concentration of 108 PFU/mL, was added into the biocomposite film solutions. This concentration was chosen to ensure sufficient phage activity for effective biocontrol against E. coli O157:H7, maximizing the antimicrobial potential of the films. The high CAM-21 MOI of 1000 allows for an intense initial interaction between the bacteriophage CAM-21 and bacterial cells, enhancing the probability of infection and bacterial lysis.


The polymer solutions were allowed to cool to room temperature before the addition of CAM-21 phage at a concentration of 108 PFU/mL. The phage-incorporated solutions were then cast in sterile plastic petri dishes to form three different film formulations: CMCS+Gelatin+SA, CMCS+Gelatin, and Pullulan+Gelatin+SA. The cast film solutions were allowed to dry overnight at room temperature in a laminar flow hood. Once dried, the films were carefully peeled from the petri dishes. Films used for testing were prepared based on the following compositions:

    • 1) CMCS (2% v/v)+Gelatin (2% v/v)+SA (0.6% v/v)+Glycerol (2% v/v)+CAM-21 (8% v/v)
    • 2) CMCS (2% v/v)+Gelatin (2% v/v)+Glycerol (2% v/v)+CAM-21 (8% v/V)
    • 3) PuI (2% v/v)+Gelatin (2% v/v)+SA (0.6% v/v)+Glycerol (2% v/v)+CAM-21 (8% v/v)
    • 4) Control samples were respective films without CAM-21 phage.


Example 10: Mechanical Properties of Films

The mechanical properties of the films prepared in Examples 9A and 9B were studied. The developed films were smooth, transparent and flexible without bubbles. For the soy protein biopolymers, tensile tests were performed using a texture analyzer (TA-HDplusC, Texture Technologies Corp., South Hamilton, MA, USA). Prior to the tensile measurement, film samples were prepared by cutting them into rectangular strips measuring 1 cm×5 cm. During the test, the crosshead speed and initial grip separation were set to 0.5 mm per second and 25 mm, respectively. The water vapor permeability (WVP) of the film samples was investigated. Initially, 15 g of anhydrous CaCl2) was placed in a beaker, which was then covered with the film samples and securely sealed using parafilm. This wrapped beaker was placed inside a desiccator maintained at 75% relative humidity (RH) and 25° C., with the desiccator containing saturated NaCl solution. Over a period of up to 12 h, the weight of the beaker was regularly monitored at specific intervals.


The WP was calculated using the following equation:







W

V

P

=


(

Δ

M
×
K

)

/

(

Δ

P
×
t
×
S

)








    • where ΔM represents the weight variation of the beaker (in grams), K is the film thickness (in meters), ΔP is the vapor pressure difference across the film (in Pascals), t is the time, and S is the vapor-exposed area under test (in square meters).





For the carbohydrate biopolymers, a texture analyzer (TA-HDplusC, Texture Technologies Corm, South Hamilton, MA) was used to analyze the physical and mechanical properties of the composite films. Films were cut into uniform rectangular strips (2 cm×5 cm) and mounted on the tensile grips, ensuring they were securely clamped without wrinkles or slack. The analyzer was set to the desired test speed and distance, commonly around 1 mm/s for tensile and puncture tests, and the test was conducted, allowing the texture analyzer to record force-displacement data as it stretches or punctures the film. The data for tensile strength, elongation at break, and puncture force were recorded.


The tensile properties of SPI-based films are shown in Table 5 below. After the incorporation of CAM-21 (1-4%), no significant variation (P>0.05) in the TS and Elongation at Break (EAB) of the film samples was observed. The results suggest that the bacteriophage concentration utilized in these films was still insufficient to have any negative impact on the film's strength and flexibility. Prior studies have reported that the incorporation of bacteriophages did not significantly affect (P>0.05) the tensile properties (e.g., puncture strength and puncture deformation) of gelatin films. CAM-21 is a very small particle with dimensions of 92.83 nm in diameter and 129.75 nm in length. Hence, the incorporation of low concentrations of bacteriophages was not expected to disrupt the structure of protein-based films that are strengthened by various types of molecular interactions, such as hydrogen and disulfide bonding, electrostatic forces, and hydrophobic interactions. A high concentration of bacteriophages may still cause structural changes in the polymer matrix due to the disruption of film homogeneity. The minor variation in TS and EAB of the films could be associated with the microstructure of SPI films incorporated with bacteriophages.









TABLE 5







Influence of CAM-21 on SPI Polymer Mechanical Properties













WVP


Sample
TS (MPa)
EAB (%)
(×10−10 gm−1 s−1 Pa−1)





S
6.35 ± 0.21
31.95 ± 0.74
2.56 ± 0.05


SC1
6.47 ± 0.12
33.75 ± 1.64
2.66 ± 0.06


SC2
6.54 ± 0.17
32.56 ± 0.63
2.66 ± 0.06


SC4
6.53 ± 0.20
32.79 ± 1.27
2.60 ± 0.12









The tensile properties of carbohydrate biopolymers are provided in FIGS. 8A and 8B. The CGSA-D film stands out for its high tensile strength, suggesting enhanced durability and resistance to breakage. In contrast, PGSA-D and PGSA films are the most flexible, with the highest elongation at break values, indicating their suitability for applications where flexibility is essential. The CG and CG-D films offer a balance of moderate tensile strength and low flexibility, suggesting limited stretchability but sufficient structural integrity. Overall, the choice of film composition should be based on the specific mechanical demands of the intended application, with CGSA-D being optimal for strength and PGSA-D for flexibility.


Example 11: Color and Opacity Analysis of Films

Film color was assessed using a colorimeter (CR-410, Konica Minolta Sensing, Inc., Japan). For SPI films, the total color difference (ΔE) of the films was calculated based on the L*, a*, and b* values obtained from the measurements, with L* representing lightness, ranging from 0 (black) to 100 (white), a* representing the color spectrum from green (negative values) to red (positive values), and b* covering the spectrum from blue (negative values) to yellow (positive values). Triplicate readings were taken to ensure consistency, and the average value was calculated for accuracy. To determine the light transmittance of the films, an UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1900i, Shimadzu Corp., Canby, OR, USA) was used. The transmittance of 0.9 cm×4.0 cm film samples at 600 nm was recorded. A blank test cell without any films served as the reference.


Film opacity was determined for SPI films using the equation:






Opacity
=

-


-

log

(

T

r

a

n


s

6

0

0



)


K






where Trans600 represents the transmittance of the films at 600 nm, and K is the film thickness (in millimeters) determined at five different locations using a digital electronic caliper (Model 35-025; iGAGING, San Clemente, CA, USA).


Film color and opacity are important indicators of food packaging materials. Results for the SPI films are provided in Table 6. As shown in Table 6, the film samples exhibited a yellowish color (large positive b* value), with great film lightness (high L* value). The incorporation of colorless CAM-21 had no significant effect (P>0.05) on the lightness, redness, and yellowness of the S film. The ΔE of phage-containing SPI films were not significantly different (P>0.05) from that of the control films. In addition, all the film samples were visually clear and transparent. The incorporation of bacteriophages in the packaging materials slightly increased the film opacity. However, no significant difference (P>0.05) in the opacity of SPI films containing different concentrations of bacteriophages was observed. These results confirm that the incorporation of bacteriophages did not significantly affect (P>0.05) the optical properties of the SPI films.









TABLE 6







Color and Opacity of Films












Sample
L*
a*
b*
ΔE
Opacity





S
87.69 ± 1.04
−1.99 ± 0.06
20.20 ± 1.68 
16.93 ± 1.90
1.59 ± 0.10


SC1
87.97 ± 0.42
−1.96 ± 0.02
20.37 ± 0.92 
17.00 ± 0.79
1.61 ± 0.17


SC2
86.77 ± 0.80
−2.02 ± 0.05
22.11 ± 1.25 
19.01 ± 1.43
1.68 ± 0.04


SC4
86.15 ± 0.79
−2.05 ± 0.07
22.43 ± 0.89 
19.54 ± 1.11
1.69 ± 0.09


CGSA
88.945 ± 0.361
−0.085 ± 0.092
5.18 ± 1.499
 0.75 ± 0.509
0.544 ± 0.080


CGSA-D
88.965 ± 0.488
 0.155 ± 0.304
3.22 ± 1.301
 0.305 ± 0.049
0.573 ± 0.076


PGSA
 88.63 ± 0.693
 0.485 ± 0.148
3.45 ± 2.574
0.615 ± 0.46
2.793 ± 0.104


PGSA-D
89.125 ± 0.94 
 0.42 ± 0.269
1.66 ± 1.824
 0.365 ± 0.262
2.264 ± 0.298


CG
 89.03 ± 0.127
−0.065 ± 0.12 
3.89 ± 0.014
 0.415 ± 0.106
0.665 ± 0.108


CG-D
 89.65 ± 0.665
 0.15 ± 0.226
2.185 ± 1.181 
0.425 ± 0.12
0.883 ± 0.138









Lightness values (L) are relatively consistent across treatments, indicating similar brightness, with CG-D showing the highest lightness (89.65), making it the brightest film. The red/green component (a*) reveals slight greenish tendency in CGSA and CG (negative a* values). This green hue is characteristic of the carboxymethyl chitosan-gelatin matrix without bacteriophage addition. PGSA represents the strongest red hue. The yellow/blue component (b*) highlights the highest yellow tone in CGSA (5.18), while PGSA-D (1.66) has the lowest yellow tone, making it the most neutral. The color difference (ΔE) is minimal for CGSA-D (0.305), indicating excellent color stability.


Opacity varies significantly, with PGSA having the highest opacity (2.793), indicating it is the least transparent, while CGSA exhibits the lowest opacity (0.544), making it the most transparent. These findings highlight the influence of composition on the visual properties of films. The opacity values in treatments meet a range of criteria for different packaging film applications. The application depends on whether the film is intended for light-blocking, product visibility, or both.


For carbohydrate-based packaging films, which are often marketed for their environmental benefits, color consistency is still important. While there isn't a specific ISO or ASTM standard focused solely on color values for carbohydrate-based packaging films, general practices in food packaging and biodegradable film production suggest that values should be as close to neutral as possible for aesthetic purposes. Manufacturers typically rely on internal standards or guidelines based on customer requirements. L* value (lightness) is the primary parameter that indicates transparency in packaging films, ranging from 0 (completely black) to 100 (completely white). For transparent films, a higher L* value (closer to 100) signifies greater transparency, as it reflects more light passing through the material with less obstruction. The more light that passes through without scattering or being absorbed, the more transparent the film appears. All of the prepared films showed L* value of around 89 for L value, aligning with consumer acceptance and industry standard.


Example 12: Compositional Properties of SPI Films

The phage count in the SPI films was assessed using a modified version of a previous technique. Film samples measuring 1.5×1.5 cm2 were placed in wells of a sterile 12-well plate. In each well, 1 mL of SM buffer was added, and the plate was agitated in a shaker incubator at 150 rpm for 3 h at room temperature. The phage count was then determined using a double-layer agar technique.


The bacteriophage distribution within the SPI films was studied using a modified version of a previous method. A spectral confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8, Leica Microsystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL) was used to observe the fluorescently labeled samples. One microliter of 100×SYBR™ Gold Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Invitrogen™, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to 0.5 ml of CAM-21 suspensions (˜109 PFU/mL), and the mixture was placed in the dark for 1 h. The labeled phage suspension was spun down using Illustra MicroSpin G-25 columns (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) equilibrated with SM buffer to eliminate excess fluorophores. The labeled phages were incorporated into the film-forming solutions and cast in sterile confocal dishes at 30° C. for 48 h. The labeled phage suspension (20 μL) was placed on a glass side and covered with a cover slip. The fluorescent images of labeled phages in the suspension and film samples were obtained using confocal microscopy.


The surface morphology of the SPI films was observed using an environmental scanning electron microscope (Quanta 600 FEG; ThermoFisher Scientific). The films were mounted on aluminum stubs for examination. Prior to SEM imaging, a thin layer of gold was applied to the mounted film samples.


The survival capability of bacteriophages in a polymer matrix is one of the important consideration factors for producing phage-based antimicrobial food packaging materials. CAM-21-containing SPI films were developed by incorporating phage suspensions in a SPI-based FFS containing CNF and glycerol, as additives. The phage titers found in SC1, SC2, and SC4 were 1.02±0.04×107 PFU/cm2, 1.41±0.16×107 PFU/cm2 and 2.41±0.43×107 PFU/cm2, respectively. The results show that the phages remained stable in the polymer matrix because SPI films offer an ideal environment for phages. The stability of phages can be improved by avoiding and reducing oxidative damage to viral nucleic acid components (RNA and DNA) and capsid, and stabilizing the structure of viral capsid proteins. For instance, because of their ordered and compact network structure, protein-based films have good oxygen barrier properties that may reduce oxidative damage. The presence of a plasticizer, such as glycerol, and high protein contents, which may stabilize the viral capsid after film drying, may also contribute to phage survival. Although a 1-2% difference of phage titer in different film formulations may seem negligible on a logarithmic scale, it was observed that even small variations in formulation can potentially influence the film properties. It is suggested that increasing the phage concentration in the film formulation may improve the film performance. For instance, the incorporation of a stock solution consisting of a higher phage concentration (1010 PFU/mL) resulted in a higher phage titer in the acetate cellulose films.


Confocal microscopy was utilized to evaluate the spatial distribution of incorporated phages (white) in the films (FIGS. 9A, 9B). The phage particles were labeled with SYBR™ Gold stain before incorporating in the SPI films (FIG. 9A). The uniform distribution of phages across the entire surface and depth of the polymer matrix is shown in FIG. 9B. Also, phage agglomeration results in the formation of small aggregates, which could be associated with the film drying method or the presence of net opposite charges in the phages' tail and head regions.


SEM was utilized to evaluate the surface morphology of different film samples (FIGS. 10A-10C). The control films were homogeneous and compact without phase separation, and the film surface was smooth with the presence of some pores and cracks (shown by red arrows, FIG. 10A). Similarly, some pores were also observed when more CAM-21 was added into the SPI films (FIGS. 10B and 10C). The presence of pores could be attributed to the aggregation of CNF during film drying. The incorporation of phage particles in the films did not induce apparent phage separation, suggesting their good compatibility in the polymer matrix. Based on the SEM micrographs, the addition of phage particles had no effect on the film microstructure, which could be associated with the minor variation in WVP and tensile properties of the SPI films.


Example 13: Compositional Properties of Carbohydrate Biopolymer Films

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis provides insight into the functional groups and chemical interactions within the films, helping to understand how the incorporation of CAM-21 bacteriophage and polymeric components (e.g., chitosan, gelatin, sodium alginate, and pullulan) may alter the chemical structure and properties of each film. To perform FTIR analysis, a Nicolet 380 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corp., USA) was used. Carbohydrate biopolymer films were cut into uniform, smooth strips. A background scan was performed prior to each sample measurement to correct for atmospheric interference, specifically from carbon dioxide and water vapor. After the background correction, the FTIR spectrometer was configured to collect spectra across the wavenumber range of 4000-400 cm−1, with a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1.


The FTIR spectra, shown in FIG. 11, reveal that each CAM-21-containing film (PGSA-D, CGSA-D and CG-D) show unique functional group interactions influenced by the presence or absence of specific polymers, specifically, sodium alginate, pullulan, and gelatin. PGSA-D shows strong hydrogen bonding and a distinct polysaccharide structure due to pullulan and alginate, which may provide a supportive matrix for CAM-21, especially for applications needing extended release. CGSA-D shows characteristic amide peaks from gelatin and COO-groups from alginate, indicating both protein and polysaccharide interactions, which may contribute to the stability and efficacy of CAM-21 phage on food surfaces. CG-D, lacking alginate, relies on interactions between carboxymethyl chitosan and gelatin, which may create a simpler matrix that still effectively stabilizes the phage but could perform differently in release kinetics compared to PGSA-D and CGSA-D. These FTIR results align with the antimicrobial findings detailed below. The matrix composition affects the stability, interaction, and potential release profile of CAM-21, with each film showing distinct characteristics suited for different applications. PGSA-D and CGSA-D, with sodium alginate's added carboxylate groups, may enhance sustained antimicrobial release, making them potentially more effective in long-term applications, compared to CG-D.


The particle size distribution in the carbohydrate biopolymer film solutions was determined using laser diffraction with a Mastersizer 3000 (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). Each film solution was prepared by dissolving the film components in water and diluting to a suitable concentration to ensure optimal scattering without multiple scattering effects. The solution was continuously stirred to prevent settling and to maintain uniform particle dispersion. For measurement, the Mastersizer was set up with the dispersant properties (refractive index and absorption) matching those of the solvent used. The instrument's pump and stirrer settings were adjusted to maintain consistent flow and prevent particle aggregation.


As shown in FIG. 12, the presence of a consistent primary particle size peak at around 1 μm across all samples indicates a high level of uniformity in particle dispersion within each film type, a desirable characteristic for film stability and performance. The slight variations in secondary peaks, particularly in CGSA samples, could reflect differences in polymer compatibility and interactions within each film matrix. The CGSA film matrix shows a broader particle size distribution, possibly due to the combined effects of carboxymethyl chitosan, gelatin, and sodium alginate, which might interact to create larger aggregates. This broader distribution could affect mechanical properties, possibly enhancing tensile strength, but slightly reducing homogeneity. The PGSA and CG films, on the other hand, display narrower distributions with more defined primary peaks, suggesting more homogeneous particle dispersion. This might contribute to their flexibility (noted in the texture analysis for PGSA) and could enhance film uniformity, which is beneficial for consistent antimicrobial action and mechanical stability.


Example 14: In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial effectiveness of the SPI films against E. coli O157:H7 strains 3178-85, EDL-933, C7927, 505B, and MF-1847 was assessed in TSB. The E. coli O157:H7 strains were cultured in TSB and incubated at 37° C. for 24 h. All strains were then combined in equal concentrations to create a five-strain cocktail. The bacterial cocktail was further diluted to achieve a concentration of approximately 104 CFU/mL, and 5 mL of this solution was transferred to sterile test tubes. Two pieces of each film sample, measuring 1 cm×5 cm, were placed in the test tubes containing the diluted bacterial cocktail. As a negative control, a bacterial culture without film was also included. The test tubes were then incubated in a shaker incubator, with continuous shaking at 150 rpm and at a temperature of 37° C. To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the edible films, plate counts of each diluted sample were performed at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h on MacConkey Sorbitol agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA). The viable bacterial counts were determined and expressed in log CFU/g values.


The effects of CAM-21 incorporated into the SPI films on E. coli O157:H7 growth are shown in FIG. 13A. For the control groups without film treatment and with the S film, the bacterial count increased from 4.3 log CFU/mL to about 9 log CFU/mL in 6 h, suggesting that SPI films do not have any inhibitory effect on E. coli O157:H7. After 3, 6, and 9 h of incubation, the bacterial counts in TSB treated with the phage-containing SPI films (SC1, SC2, and SC4) were significantly reduced (P≤0.05) by at least 1.6 log CFU/mL. This could be associated with the short infection period of phages on their host bacteria, that results in bacterial cell lysis after 25-30 min of infection. The best inhibitory effect was presented by the SC4 films, which were incorporated with the highest concentration of CAM-21, and exhibited a maximum reduction of 4.6 log CFU/mL after 6 h of incubation. These results suggest that the antimicrobial activity of the films depends on the concentration of bacteriophages. After 12 h of incubation, the antimicrobial activity of SC2 and SC4 against E. coli O157:H7 was still effective. These findings show that the antimicrobial activity of CAM-21 is preserved during the drying process of the FFS, indicating that the addition of bacteriophages protects their infective capability.


In-vitro antimicrobial activity was also tested in the carbohydrate biopolymer films. To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of bacteriophage-loaded films in broth media, 2×2 cm2 of each film (CG-D, CGSA-D, PGSA-D) were cut and placed in tubes containing sterile peptone water inoculated with E. coli O157:H7 at approximately 105 CFU/mL. The tubes were incubated at 37° C. with gentle shaking, and bacterial counts were measured at multiple time points (0, 4, 8 and 24 h) by serially diluting and plating the broth samples on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA). The reduction in bacterial count was calculated and analyzed statistically to assess the effectiveness of each film. All of the tests were done in at least three replications.


Results for the carbohydrate biopolymers are shown in FIG. 13B. Among the compositions tested, CG-D (carboxymethyl chitosan-gelatin with CAM-21) and PGSA-D (pullulan-sodium alginate with CAM-21) exhibited the most substantial reductions in E. coli O157:H7 count over time, compared to the control, demonstrating enhanced antimicrobial efficacy. Initial bacterial counts were similar across all samples at the 0-h time point. After 4 h, significant reductions in bacterial count emerged for CGSA-D, PGSA-D, and CG-D films, with the effect continuing at 8 h. After 24 h of incubation, bacterial counts in the CGSA treatment remained statistically lower than the control (P≤0.05), while all other treatments showed decreased bacterial counts as compared to the control, although the decrease was not significant (P>0.05). This time-dependent increase in efficacy suggests that the polymeric matrix supports a gradual release and sustained activity of the phage.


The synergistic interactions between CAM-21 bacteriophage and the polymeric matrices (carboxymethyl chitosan-gelatin and pullulan-sodium alginate) likely contributed to these effects by creating an environment conducive to prolonged phage-bacteria interactions. This performance difference may also be influenced by the presence of sodium alginate in CGSA-D, potentially altering the release kinetics of CAM-21. Overall, these results underscore the potential of CAM-21-incorporated films as natural, biodegradable alternatives to conventional food packaging materials, capable of extending shelf life and ensuring food safety through sustained antimicrobial action.


Example 15: Antimicrobial Effectiveness in Food Studies

The antimicrobial effectiveness of the films against the E. coli O157:H7 strains was assessed using fresh raw bottom round beef and raw beef trimmings as food models. The E. coli O157:H7 strains were cultured in TSB and incubated at 37° C. for 24 h. All strains were then combined in equal concentrations to create a bacterial cocktail. The bacterial cocktail was subjected to centrifugation at 12,745×g (10,000 rpm) for 5 min and washed with peptone water. This washing process was repeated two additional times.


Beef samples were cut into 1.5 cm3 pieces, and 50 μl of 106 CFU/mL bacterial cultures were added and spread on the surface of each food sample using a pipet tip. The spiked foods were left in a laminar hood at room temperature for 15 min to allow for bacterial attachment. Subsequently, 1.5 cm2 of films were placed onto the inoculated surface of the food samples. As a control, one food sample was left without any film treatment.


The food samples were then stored in a refrigerator at 4° C. and 25% RH. Samples were collected after 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days of storage. On each sampling day, the beef samples were placed in sterile stomacher bags, and 90 mL of peptone water (0.1% w/v) were added to each bag. The samples were homogenized using a Stomacher™ Circulator Model 400 (Seward, Ltd.). The homogenates were serially diluted and plated on MacConkey sorbitol agar plates. The plates were then incubated for 24 hat 37° C. The total viable bacterial counts were determined and expressed in log CFU/g values.


Results from the investigation on contaminated raw bottom round beef are shown in FIG. 14A. Beef samples treated with S films, as well as untreated samples, showed a gradual increase in bacterial counts during 3 days of refrigerated storage, reaching approximately 6.7 log CFU/g, indicating meat spoilage. In contrast, beef samples treated with SPI films incorporating Escherichia phage CAM-21 demonstrated antimicrobial activity against E. coli O157:H7, delaying bacterial growth. The phage containing films (SC1, SC2, and SC4) reduced the bacterial count by a maximum of 1.5 and 2.0 log CFU/g after 3 and 5 days of storage, respectively. However, by day 5, all the beef samples had microbial loads of at least 6.9 log CFU/g, indicating spoilage.


Additionally, the biocontrol effect of phage-containing SPI films was evaluated on raw beef trimmings (FIG. 14B). Both beef samples that are untreated and treated with S films showed an increase in bacterial count of about 1.8 log CFU/g after 1 day of storage. The antimicrobial activity of the SC2 and SC4 films against E. coli O157:H7 was superior to that of the SC1 films on day 1, as they delayed bacterial growth. By day 3 of storage, the microbial load of all beef trimmings exceeded 7 log CFU/g. The variation in antimicrobial effects might be due to the complexity of the food system, including carbohydrate, protein, and fat, as well as water content in beef products. These factors can affect the interaction between phages and E. coli O157:H7, potentially hindering phage transport to the active site of target bacteria. The study concluded that SPI films containing bacteriophages demonstrated significant antimicrobial activity against E. coli O157:H7 in beef products, making them promising candidates for antimicrobial food packaging to preserve the safety of beef products.


To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the carbohydrate biopolymer films against E. coli O157:H7 on spinach leaves, a bacterial culture was grown in TSB at 37° C. overnight, then centrifuged and washed twice with PBS for purity. Baby spinach leaves, aseptically cut into 4 in2 squares were placed and each square placed in sterile petri dishes. A 100 μL aliquot of 107 CFU/mL bacterial suspension was spread on each spinach leaf, and the inoculated spinach leaves were left in a laminar flow hood for 30 min to allow for bacterial attachment. Untreated (without film) samples served as controls. The samples were stored at 4° C. and collected at intervals of 0, 1, 5, and 7 days. On each sampling day, each spinach leaf was suspended in 9 mL PBS and shaken at 200 rpm, 37° C. for 15 min in a shaker incubator. Serially diluted samples were plated on MacConkey sorbitol agar and colonies were enumerated after an overnight incubation at 37° C.


Results are shown in FIG. 15. By day 1, a reduction in E. coli O157:H7 count was observed across all treatments, with CGSA-D showing the most pronounced reduction, followed by CG-D and PGSA-D. By day 5, CGSA-D maintained the lowest bacterial count, indicating an impressive antimicrobial activity, while CG-D also showing effective bacterial inhibition, but to a slightly lesser degree than CGSA-D. In contrast, the control retained the highest bacterial counts, underscoring the importance of CAM-21 incorporation for antimicrobial effects in the biocomposite films. CGSA-D outperformed the other films by day 5, followed by CG-D, while CG-D demonstrated a better effect than CGSA on day 7, which suggests that the addition of sodium alginate in the CGSA matrix may enhance antimicrobial activity on a food surface, possibly by improving adherence or the release profile of CAM-21 in refrigerated, real-food conditions.


Example 16: Synthesis and Characterization of Quantum Dots for Pathogen Detection

Nitrogen doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) were synthesized using p-phenylenediamine (p-PD) and melamine. Specifically, 0.13 g of p-PD and 0.1 g of melamine were dissolved in 30 mL of ethanol. This mixture was then transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and reacted at 180° C. for 20 h. The resulting N-GQDs were purified through continuous dialysis in Milli-Q water, followed by extraction with ethyl acetate. Finally, the N-GQDs were dried at 60° C. using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator. The purified N-GQDs were then examined using gel electrophoresis and compared to the initially synthesized and dialyzed N-GQDs.


The synthesized NGQDs were purified by a combined dialysis-solvent extraction approach. The results were analyzed by electrophoresis, as shown in FIGS. 16A and 16B. Both the original and dialyzed NGQDs exhibited two bands: one purple and one orange. However, the purified NGQDs displayed only a single orange band. The purple (top) band in the unpurified NGQDs did not fluoresce, while the orange band in all three samples exhibited fluorescence. This indicates that the new purification method is effective for NGQDs.


Fluorescence spectra and UV-vis absorption spectra were employed to investigate the optical properties of the purified N-GQDs. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and High-Resolution TEM (HRTEM) observations were conducted using transmission electron microscopes (FEI Tecnai F-20 S-Twin, transmission electron microscope, Netherlands). The purified NGQDs were dried and subsequently utilized for chemical composition and structural analysis. Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra were characterized with a Nicolet 380 attenuated total reflectance-FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corp., USA). X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were gathered using a Thermo ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured using a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer (SmartLab-II, Japan).


The NGQDs display a peak at 248 nm in the UV-vis spectrum, attributed to the π-π transitions* of the sp2 hybridized graphite core. Additional peaks appear around 290 nm and 500 nm, corresponding to the n-IT transitions* characteristic of C—N and C═N groups (FIG. 17). The N-GQDs exhibit an excitation-independent emission spectrum with a maximum emission at 600 nm in ethanol (λexc=365 nm).


The quantum yield of the N-GQDs was measured using a spectrofluorophotometer (Shimadzu RF-6000). Quantum yield is a key parameter for evaluating the luminous intensity and efficiency of fluorescent materials. The RF-6000 spectrofluorophotometer was employed to measure and calculate the quantum yield using the relative method, with Rhodamine B in ethanol (Quantum yield=0.56) as the reference standard. The quantum yield of NGQDs (in water) was calculated according to the following equation:






Q
=


Q
S

×

F

F
S


×


A
S

A

×


η
2


η
S
2







Where Q represents the quantum yield, F is the measured integrated emission intensity, A is the optical density and η is the refractive index of the respective solvents. The subscript “S” refers to a standard with a known quantum yield.


XRD analysis of the NGQDs shows a broad diffraction peak centered at 23.7° (FIG. 18A), indicating their amorphous nature. The elemental composition of the NGQDs was examined using XPS (FIG. 18B), revealing three characteristic signals: C1s at 284 eV, N1s at 399 eV, and O1s at 532 eV, with atomic percentages of 87.14%, 4.8% and 8.06%, respectively. The quantum yield of the N-GQDs was measured under 365 nm excitation, resulting in a quantum yield of approximately 22%.


Example 17: Synthesis and Characterization of O-NGQDs

Orange emissive N-doped graphene quantum dots were prepared as follows. p-phenylenediamine (0.11 g) was dissolved in absolute ethanol and subsequently transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave. The mixture was heated at 180° C. for 16 h. Following cooling to room temperature, the solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm PES membrane. The resulting N-GQDs were subjected to continuous dialysis (500 D size) for purification, and subsequently dried at 50° C. using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator (CentriVap, Labconco).


For further purification, O-NGQD were dissolved in DMSO and separated using a 1% agarose gel. The band displaying orange fluorescence was excised from the gel. The resulting N-GQD was dried at 50° C. using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator (Acid-resistant CentriVap, Labconco).


UV-Vis spectra and fluorescence spectra were obtained using a Synergy H1 microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments Inc.). FI-IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 380 (Thermo Fisher) FTIR spectrophotometer.


The synthesized O-NGDQ solution, which is red under ambient light, emitted bright orange fluorescence under 365 nm UV light. NGQD typically exhibit peaks in two characteristic regions in the UV-vis spectrum, one between 220 and 280 nm, assigned to the π-π* transitions (of the sp2 hybridized graphite core) and the other between 280 and 580 nm, related to the n-π* transitions (associated with functional surface groups). However, the peak around between 220-280 nm is too high to be detected. There should have been peaks in this range. The O-NGQDs also showed peaks around 310 nm and 510 nm, which can be attributed to the n-π* transitions characteristics of C—N and C═N groups (FIG. 19). The O-NGQDs showed an excitation independent emission spectrum, with maximum emission at 610 nm (λexc=360 nm) (FIG. 20). FTIR spectra of the O-NGQDs showed bands related to OH/NH, C═N, C═C and C═O groups (FIG. 21). FIG. 22 shows the fluorescence spectra of R-GQDs dispersed in DMSO solution with varying water content, ranging from 0% to 100%. With an increase in the water content, there is a gradual reduction in the photoluminescence (PL) intensity, accompanied by a minor red-shift in the peak position.


Despite undergoing dialysis for purification, NGQD was still not pure enough. According to some references, NGQD can be further purified by column chromatography. Because this method is time-consuming and expensive, purifying them by agarose gel electrophoresis, which is easier and more economical, was attempted. After purification by electrophoresis, the solubility and fluorescence intensity were significantly increased in water (FIG. 23), compared with FIG. 22.


Example 18: Conjugation of O-NGQD with CAM-21

N-doped GQD were initially dissolved in DMSO and subsequently diluted in PBS (pH 7.4). N-GQDs was first modified by the crosslinkers, succinimidyl 4-[N-maleimidomethyl]cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC) and mercaptosuccinic acid (MSA). Subsequently, the surface carboxyl groups of the modified NGQDs were activated using an EDC/NHS method. A CAM-21 phage solution (1011 PFU/mL) was added, and the entire solution was incubated at 4° C. overnight. The phage conjugate was then isolated through ultracentrifugation (20,000 rpm, 4° C.; Sorval) for 2 h. Finally, the fluorescence spectra and phage counts were determined.


For phage CAM-21 conjugation on the surface of O-NGQD, a crosslinker, SMCC, was introduced to modify the surface functional amine groups of O-NGQDs to reduce their self-conjugation. FIG. 24 reveals that phage CAM-21 was successfully conjugated on the surface of O-NGQD.


In summary, multifunctional O-NGQD were synthesized with a simple one-step hydrothermal carbonization method. The as-synthesized O-NGQDs exhibit orange emission with an excitation wavelength independent property. The FTIR spectrum reveals the presence of abundant oxygen- and nitrogen-containing functional groups. Further, the O-NGQDs exhibited obvious solvent-dependent light emission properties. Notably, as the water content in the solvent increased, a substantial decline was observed in both their solubility and fluorescence intensity. However, following a purification process involving gel electrophoresis, a remarkable enhancement in both solubility and fluorescence intensity was observed. Furthermore, the methods described have effectively conjugated these O-NGQDs with phage CAM-21.


Example 19: Preparation of NGQD-CAM-21 Probe

Phage CAM-21 suspension was subjected to centrifugation at 671,328×g for 2 h. The resulting pellet was resuspended in NGQD solution (PBS, pH 7.4) and incubated in 4° C. for 48 h. The NGQD-CAM-21 composite was then collected by centrifugation at 671,328×g for 2 h. Following two washes with PBS buffer (pH 7.4), the composite was resuspended in PBS and stored at 4° C. for further use.


Example 20: Fabrication of LFA Strips and Detection of E. coli O157:H7 Using the Phage-Based LFA

The platform comprised three components: a detection pad, an absorbent pad, and a nitrocellulose membrane. The detection and absorbent pads were prepared by sequentially washing with Milli-Q water, PBST (PBS pH 7.4, Tween20 0.5%) and PBS buffer, followed by drying in an oven at 37° C. overnight. Phage CAM-21 (1010 PFU/mL) and NGQD solution (in ethanol) were used to print the test and control lines. The membrane was then stored at 4° C. overnight, protected with aluminum foil. Prior to use, the detection and absorbent pads were assembled on the prepared membrane, and the strips were cut to 4 mm width.



E. coli O157:H7 C7927 was serially diluted to concentrations ranging from 101 to 107 CFU/mL. The bacterial count in each sample was determined by plating on TSA, incubating at 37° C. overnight, and enumerating colonies. Each sample solution (100 mL) was pipetted onto the detection pad, and the strip incubated at 37° C. for 15 min, followed by washing with 100 μL of PBS buffer containing 2% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20. Subsequently, 50 μL of the NGQD-CAM-21 (1011 PFU/mL) composite was added to the detection pad and incubated at 37° C. for 15 min. The result was analyzed using an ESEQuant LR3 lateral flow reader.


To evaluate the effectiveness of the phage-based LFA for detecting E. coli O157 in food samples, the platform was used to test milk and beef samples spiked with the pathogen. Twenty-five grams of beef rump roast and 10 mL of pasteurized milk were inoculated with bacterial dilutions at relevant concentrations and incubated at room temp for 30 min to allow for bacterial attachment. The samples were then homogenized in stomacher bags containing PBS buffer. Serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared and plated on MacConkey-sorbitol agar to determine E. coli O157:H7 counts. The samples were then tested by following the same procedure as described for PBS buffer.



E. coli O157:H7 C7927 samples in PBS buffer with concentrations between 101 to 107 were measured with this LFA platform. The fluorescence intensity exhibited a positive correlation with the concentration of E. coli O157:H7, ranging from 101 to 107 CFU/mL. The intensity values increased consistently with higher concentrations of E. coli. The limit of detection of the bacterial samples in PBS buffer is around 10 CFU/mL.


To evaluate the test's performance across various food matrices, milk and beef samples were inoculated with different concentrations of the analyte and assessed using the proposed lateral flow strips. The limit of detection for meat and milk was approximately 104 CFU mL−1, significantly higher than in PBS buffer. These findings indicate that the sample matrix influences the lateral flow test's performance, a common occurrence in such assays. This effect may also be linked to changes in the microenvironment, such as the food matrix composition, polarity, hydrogen-bonding capability, local viscosity, pH, and ionic strength of the matrix solution, which can impact the photoluminescent properties of the NGQDs-CAM 21 probe.

Claims
  • 1. A film product comprising: a film; anda quantity of bacteriophage deposited on or incorporated in the film.
  • 2. The film product of claim 1, wherein said film comprises one or more proteins or carbohydrates, or any combination thereof.
  • 3. The film product of claim 2, wherein said one or more protein and/or carbohydrate materials is selected from the group consisting of soy protein isolate (SPI), whey protein concentrate (WPC), starches including modified starch (corn syrup), oligosaccharides, pullulan, gelatin, acetate cellulose, sodium caseinate, glycerol, sodium alginate (SA), carboxymethylcellulose, cellulose nanofiber, and any combination thereof.
  • 4. The film product of claim 2, wherein said one or more proteins or carbohydrates comprises soy-protein isolate, cellulose nanofiber, and glycerol.
  • 5. The film product of claim 1, further comprising a solvent.
  • 6. The film product of claim 5, wherein said solvent is selected from the group consisting of distilled water, a buffer, organic acids, alcohols, ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide, and any combination thereof.
  • 7. The film product of claim 1, wherein said bacteriophage has lytic activity against Escherichia coli (E. coli).
  • 8. The film product of claim 1, wherein said bacteriophage has at least 90% sequence homology with SEQ ID NO. 1.
  • 9. The film product of claim 1, wherein said bacteriophage is deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477.
  • 10. The film product of claim 1, wherein said film product has at least one measurement or characteristic selected from color, lightness, redness, yellowness, opacity, tensile strength, flexibility, stretchability, and stability, that is at least 95% identical between films having the same composition other than said bacteriophage.
  • 11. The film product of claim 1, wherein the quantity of bacteriophage comprises at least 0.5 wt % of the film product.
  • 12. The film product of claim 1, wherein the bacteriophage is encapsulated with an encapsulant.
  • 13. The film product of claim 12, wherein the encapsulant comprises sodium alginate.
  • 14. A biosensor comprising: a bacteriophage; anda graphene quantum dot.
  • 15. The biosensor of claim 14, wherein said bacteriophage has lytic activity against E. coli.
  • 16. The biosensor of claim 14, wherein said bacteriophage has at least 90% sequence homology with SEQ ID NO. 1.
  • 17. The biosensor of claim 14, wherein said bacteriophage is deposited under GenBank accession number OP611477.
  • 18. The biosensor of claim 14, wherein said bacteriophage and said graphene quantum dot are conjugated together.
  • 19. The biosensor of claim 14, wherein said graphene quantum dot is N-doped.
  • 20. A method of detecting E. coli in or on a food product comprising the steps of: applying the biosensor of claim 14 to a food product;applying light from an excitation source to said biosensor and said food product;detecting a photoluminescence spectrum emitted by the biosensor; andidentifying the presence or absence of E. coli in or on said food product on the basis of an intensity and/or wavelength and/or a photoluminescence lifetime.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63599693 Nov 2023 US