All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
This invention generally relates to ultrasound imaging, and more particularly to M-mode imaging of arbitrary paths.
Conventional ultrasound (or “scanline based” ultrasound as used herein) utilizes a phased array controller to produce and steer a substantially linear transmit waveform. In order to produce a B-mode image, a sequence of such linear waveforms (or “scanlines”) may be produced and steered so as to scan across a region of interest. Echoes are received along each respective scanline. The individual scanlines from a complete scan may then be combined to form a complete image (sometimes referred to as a “sector scan” image).
A display method known as M-mode (or motion mode) imaging is commonly used in cardiology and other fields where it is desirable to view the motion of imaged objects. In some forms of M-mode imaging, echoes from a one-dimensional line are displayed over time relative to a static reference point in order to allow a clinician to evaluate movement of a particular structure (such as a cardiac wall or valve) over time. Because a traditional scanline-based ultrasound path is directional (along the scanline axis), available M-mode lines tend to be limited to paths along a scanline.
Generally, M-mode imaging provides a graphic indication of positions and movements of structures within a body over time. In some cases, a single stationary focused acoustic beam is fired at a high frame rate and the resulting M-mode images or lines are displayed side-by-side, providing an indication of the function of a heart over multiple heart cycles.
A method of defining and displaying an m-mode path for display in an ultrasound imaging system, the method comprising transmitting an ultrasound signal from a transmitting transducer element into a region of interest including a structure of interest, receiving echoes with at least one receiving transducer element, producing an image of the region of interest from the received echoes, displaying the image of the region of interest including the structure of interest to a user, defining a one-pixel-wide path through the structure of interest, where the path does not lie along a line that intersects the transmitting transducer element or the receiving transducer element, and displaying a graph of a magnitude of pixels along the path over time.
In some embodiments, the path is non-linear. In other embodiments, the path has at least one curved segment. In one embodiment, the path has at least one linear segment and at least one curved segment. In another embodiment, the path has at least two linear segments that intersect at an angle other than 180 degrees. In some embodiments, the path has at least two discontinuous segments.
In one embodiment, the transmitting transducer element lies on a separate physical transducer array from an array containing the at least one receiving transducer element.
In another embodiment, the transmitting transducer is configured to transmit an unfocused ping ultrasound signal into the region of interest.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises receiving echoes from the entire region of interest with the at least one receiving transducer element, receiving echoes from the entire region of interest with a second receiving transducer element, and producing an image of the region of interest by combining echoes received at the first and second transducer elements.
In some embodiments, defining a path through the structure of interest is performed substantially concurrently with said transmitting and receiving.
In another embodiment, the transmitting transducer is configured to insonofy a phased array scan line.
A method of ultrasound imaging is also provided, comprising transmitting ultrasound signals into a region of interest and receiving echoes of the transmitted ultrasound signals with an ultrasound probe, defining a first image window as a portion of the region of interest, identifying an M-mode path intersecting a feature visible in the first image window, displaying data representing the M-mode path on a common display with a B-mode image of the first image window, defining a second image window as a portion of the region of interest that is different than the first image window, and displaying the data representing the M-mode path on a common display with a B-mode image of the second image window.
In one embodiment, all of the method steps are performed during a live real-time imaging session.
In another embodiment, the M-mode path includes at least one non-linear segment. In one embodiment, the M-mode path is not a line intersecting the probe.
In another embodiment, all of the method steps are performed using stored raw echo data retrieved from a raw data memory device.
In some embodiments, the first image window is smaller than and lies entirely within the second image window. In another embodiment, the second image window does not overlap the first image window.
In an additional embodiment, the method further comprises simultaneously displaying the data of the M-mode path on a common display with B-mode images of both the first image window and the second window.
In some embodiments, the M-mode path has at least two dis-continuous segments.
A multi-aperture M-mode ultrasound imaging system is also provided, comprising a transmitting transducer element configured to transmit an ultrasound signal into a region of interest including a structure of interest, a receiving transducer element separate from the transmitting transducer element, the receiving transducer element configured to receive echoes from the ultrasound signal, a controller configured to produce an image of the region of interest from the received echoes, an input mechanism configured to receive a user input defining a one-pixel-wide path through the structure of interest, where the path does not lie along a line that intersects the transmitting transducer element or the receiving transducer element, and a display configured to display the region of interest including the structure of interest, the display also configured to display a graph of a magnitude of pixels along the path over time.
In some embodiments, the transmitting transducer is configured to transmit an unfocused ping ultrasound signal into the region of interest.
In another embodiment, the transmitting transducer is configured to transmit an unfocused spherical ping ultrasound signal into the region of interest. In some embodiments, the transmitting transducer is configured insonify a phased array scan line.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
Having thus summarized the general nature of the invention, embodiments and modifications thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description below with reference to the attached figures.
In traditional ultrasound systems, images are generated by combining echoes from a series of pulses transmitted as phased array scan lines. In such scanline-based ultrasound imaging systems, the coordinate system used by the user interface usually lies along the scan lines. As a result, in such systems, a user interface for selecting an M-mode line typically involves selecting a desired segment of one of the scan lines. However, requiring the use of scan lines as M-mode lines means that the sonographer must position and hold the probe such that at least one of the scanlines intersects an anatomical feature through which an M-mode line is desired. In practice, this may be difficult and/or time consuming, and may limit the field of view.
Embodiments below provide systems and methods for obtaining M-mode data substantially in real-time along an arbitrary and/or user-defined path that does not necessarily lie along an ultrasound scan line. In some embodiments, the path may be a one-dimensional straight line. In other embodiments, the path may comprise a zig-zag pattern, a curved path, or any other non-linear path. As used herein the term “one-dimensional” may refer to a narrow path, whether linear, curved, or otherwise shaped. In some embodiments, a one-dimensional path may have a width of a single display pixel. In other embodiments, a one-dimensional path may have a width greater than one display pixel (e.g., 2 or 3 pixels), but may still have a length that is substantially greater than its width. As will be clear to the skilled artisan, the relationship between actual dimensions of represented objects and image pixels may be any value defined by the imaging system. In some embodiments, the M-mode path is not necessarily a straight line, and may include components at any orientation within the scan plane.
In some embodiments, an ultrasound imaging system may be configured to obtain three-dimensional (3D) image data, in which case an M-mode path may be selected from a displayed 3D volume. For example, an M-mode path may be defined in a 3D volume by selecting a desired plane through the 3D volume, and then defining an M-mode path within the selected 2D plane using any of the systems and methods described herein.
Some embodiments of systems and methods for specifying and displaying arbitrary M-mode lines may be used in conjunction with ping-based and/or multiple aperture ultrasound imaging systems. In other embodiments, systems and methods for specifying and displaying arbitrary M-mode lines as shown and described herein may also be used in conjunction with scanline-based imaging systems.
Ultrasound Imaging System Components
The B-Mode processor 20 may be configured to perform functions that include but are not limited to filtering, frequency and spatial compounding, harmonic data processing and other B-Mode functions. In some embodiments, the processed data may then be passed through a scan converter 24 configured to geometrically correct the data from a linear or polar geometry used by a phased-array scanning probe into a Cartesian format (x,y or x,y,z) with appropriate scaling in each dimension. In some embodiments, such as the embodiment described below with reference to
Data for each 2D image or 3D volume may then be stored in a memory 28. The memory 28 may be volatile and/or non-volatile memory configured to store a few seconds up to several minutes or more of 2D or 3D echo image data. The video processor 26 may be configured to take the echo data stored in memory 28 and instructions from the central controller 16 to form video images, including any added graphic overlays and/or text annotation (e.g. patient information). Processed video data may then be passed on to the display 30 for presentation to the operator. The central controller 16 can direct the video processor 26 to display the most recently acquired data in memory as a real-time display, or it can replay sequences of older stored 2D slice or 3D volume data.
An M-mode processor 235 may also be provided to receive a definition of an M-mode path from a user interface and to form the images displaying the selected M-mode data in a desired output format. In some embodiments, an M-mode processor 235 may also include a (volatile or non-volatile) memory device for storing the defined M-mode path. In some embodiments, an M-mode processor 235 may be logically positioned between the video processor 26 and the display 30 in the diagram of
The transmission of ultrasound signals from elements of the probe 202 may be controlled by a transmit controller 204. Upon receiving echoes of transmit signals, the probe elements may generate time-varying electric signals corresponding to the received ultrasound vibrations. Signals representing the received echoes may be output from the probe 202 and sent to a receive subsystem 210. In some embodiments, the receive subsystem may include multiple channels, each of which may include an analog front-end device (“AFE”) 212 and an analog-to-digital conversion device (ADC) 214. In some embodiments, each channel of the receive subsystem 210 may also include digital filters and data conditioners (not shown) after the ADC 214. In some embodiments, analog filters prior to the ADC 214 may also be provided. The output of each ADC 214 may be directed into a raw data memory device 220. In some embodiments, an independent channel of the receive subsystem 210 may be provided for each receive transducer element of the probe 202. In other embodiments, two or more transducer elements may share a common receive channel.
In some embodiments, an analog front-end device 212 (AFE) may perform certain filtering processes before passing the signal to an analog-to-digital conversion device 214 (ADC). The ADC 214 may be configured to convert received analog signals into a series of digital data points at some pre-determined sampling rate. Unlike most ultrasound systems, some embodiments of the ultrasound imaging system of
In order to convert the captured digital samples into an image, the data into an image, the data may be retrieved from the raw data memory 220 by an image generation subsystem 230. As shown, the image generation subsystem 230 may include a beamforming block 232 and an image layer combining (“ILC”) block 234. In some embodiments, a beamformer 232 may be in communication with a calibration memory 238 that contains probe calibration data. Probe calibration data may include information about the precise acoustic position, operational quality, and/or other information about individual probe transducer elements. The calibration memory 238 may be physically located within the probe, within the imaging system, or in location external to both the probe and the imaging system.
In some embodiments, after passing through the image generation block 230, image data may then be stored in an image buffer memory 236 which may store beamformed and (in some embodiments) layer-combined image frames. A video processor 242 within a video subsystem 240 may then retrieve image frames from the image buffer, and may process the images into a video stream that may be displayed on a video display 244 and/or stored in a video memory 246 as a digital video clip, e.g. as referred to in the art as a “cine loop”.
An M-mode processor 235 may also be provided to receive a definition of an M-mode path from a user interface and to form the images displaying the selected M-mode data in a desired output format. In some embodiments, an M-mode processor 235 may also include a (volatile or non-volatile) memory device for storing the defined M-mode path. In some embodiments, an M-mode processor 235 may be logically positioned between the image buffer 236 and the video processor 242 in the diagram of
In some embodiments, raw echo data stored in a memory device may be retrieved, beamformed, processed into images, and displayed on a display using a device other than an ultrasound imaging system. For example, such a system may omit the probe 202, the transmit controller 204 and the receive sub-system 210 of
Introduction to Ping-Based Imaging
Some embodiments of ultrasound imaging systems to be used in combination with the systems and methods described herein may use point source transmission of ultrasound signals during the transmit pulse. An ultrasound wavefront transmitted from a point source (also referred to herein as a “ping”) illuminates the entire region of interest with each circular or spherical wavefront. Echoes from a single ping received by a single receive transducer element may be beamformed to form a complete image of the insonified region of interest. By combining data and images from multiple receive transducers across a wide probe, and by combining data from multiple pings, very high resolution images may be obtained.
As used herein the terms “point source transmission” and “ping” may refer to an introduction of transmitted ultrasound energy into a medium from a single spatial location. This may be accomplished using a single ultrasound transducer element or combination of adjacent transducer elements transmitting together. A single transmission from one or more element(s) may approximate a uniform spherical wave front, or in the case of imaging a 2D slice, may create a uniform circular wavefront within the 2D slice. In some cases, a single transmission of a circular or spherical wavefront from a point source transmit aperture may be referred to herein as a “ping” or a “point source pulse” or an “unfocused pulse.”
Point source transmission differs in its spatial characteristics from a scanline-based “phased array transmission” or a “directed pulse transmission” which focuses energy in a particular direction (along a scanline) from the transducer element array. Phased array transmission manipulates the phase of a group of transducer elements in sequence so as to strengthen or steer an insonifying wave to a specific region of interest.
Images may be formed from such ultrasound pings by beamforming the echoes received by one or more receive transducer elements. In some embodiments, such receive elements may be arranged into a plurality of apertures in a process referred to as multiple aperture ultrasound imaging.
Beamforming is generally understood to be a process by which imaging signals received at multiple discrete receptors are combined to form a complete coherent image. The process of ping-based beamforming is consistent with this understanding. Embodiments of ping-based beamforming generally involve determining the position of reflectors corresponding to portions of received echo data based on the path along which an ultrasound signal may have traveled, an assumed-constant speed of sound and the elapsed time between a transmit ping and the time at which an echo is received. In other words, ping-based imaging involves a calculation of distance based on an assumed speed and a measured time. Once such a distance has been calculated, it is possible to triangulate the possible positions of any given reflector. This distance calculation is made possible with accurate information about the relative positions of transmit and receive transducer elements (As discussed in Applicants' previous applications referenced above, a multiple aperture probe may be calibrated to determine the acoustic position of each transducer element to at least a desired degree of accuracy.) In some embodiments, ping-based beamforming may be referred to as “dynamic beamforming.”
A dynamic beamformer may be used to determine a location and an intensity for an image pixel corresponding to each of the echoes resulting from each transmitted ping. When transmitting a ping signal, no beamforming need be applied to the transmitted waveform, but dynamic beamforming may be used to combine the echoes received with the plurality of receive transducers to form pixel data.
The image quality may be further improved by combining images formed by the beamformer from one or more subsequent transmitted pings. Still further improvements to image quality may be obtained by combining images formed by more than one receive aperture. An important consideration is whether the summation of images from different pings or receive apertures should be coherent summation (phase sensitive) or incoherent summation (summing magnitude of the signals without phase information). In some embodiments, coherent (phase sensitive) summation may be used to combine echo data received by transducer elements located on a common receive aperture resulting from one or more pings. In some embodiments, incoherent summation may be used to combine echo data or image data received by receive apertures that could possibly contain cancelling phase data. Such may be the case with receive apertures that have a combined total aperture that is greater than a maximum coherent aperture width for a given imaging target.
As used herein the terms “ultrasound transducer” and “transducer” may carry their ordinary meanings as understood by those skilled in the art of ultrasound imaging technologies, and may refer without limitation to any single component capable of converting an electrical signal into an ultrasonic signal and/or vice versa. For example, in some embodiments, an ultrasound transducer may comprise a piezoelectric device. In some alternative embodiments, ultrasound transducers may comprise capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers (CMUT). Transducers are often configured in arrays of multiple elements. An element of a transducer array may be the smallest discrete component of an array. For example, in the case of an array of piezoelectric transducer elements, each element may be a single piezoelectric crystal.
As used herein, the terms “transmit element” and “receive element” may carry their ordinary meanings as understood by those skilled in the art of ultrasound imaging technologies. The term “transmit element” may refer without limitation to an ultrasound transducer element which at least momentarily performs a transmit function in which an electrical signal is converted into an ultrasound signal. Similarly, the term “receive element” may refer without limitation to an ultrasound transducer element which at least momentarily performs a receive function in which an ultrasound signal impinging on the element is converted into an electrical signal. Transmission of ultrasound into a medium may also be referred to herein as “insonifying.” An object or structure which reflects ultrasound waves may be referred to as a “reflector” or a “scatterer.”
As used herein the term “aperture” refers without limitation to one or more ultrasound transducer elements collectively performing a common function at a given instant of time. For example, in some embodiments, the term aperture may refer to a group of transducer elements performing a transmit function. In alternative embodiments, the term aperture may refer to a plurality of transducer elements performing a receive function. In some embodiments, group of transducer elements forming an aperture may be redefined at different points in time.
Generating ultrasound images using a ping-based ultrasound imaging process means that images from an entire region of interest are “in focus” at all times. This is true because each transmitted ping illuminates the entire region, receive apertures receive echoes from the entire region, and the dynamic multiple aperture beamforming process may form an image of any part or all of the insonified region. In such cases, the maximum extent of the image may be primarily limited by attenuation and signal-to-noise factors rather than by the confined focus of a transmit or receive beamforming apparatus. As a result, a full-resolution image may be formed from any portion of a region of interest using the same set of raw echo data. As used herein, the term “image window” will be used to refer to a selected portion of an entire insonified region of interest that is being displayed at any given time. For example, a first image window may be selected to include an entire insonified area, and then a user may choose to “zoom in” on a smaller selected area, thereby defining a new image window. The user may then choose to zoom out or pan the image window vertically and/or horizontally, thereby selecting yet another image window. In some embodiments, separate simultaneous images may be formed of multiple overlapping or non-overlapping image windows within a single insonified region.
Embodiments of Multiple Aperture Ultrasound Imaging Systems and Methods
Applicant's prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/865,501 filed on Oct. 1, 2007, published as US Patent Application Publication 2008/0103393 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/029,907 (“the '907 application”), published as 2011/0201933, describe embodiments of ultrasound imaging techniques using probes with multiple apertures to provide substantially increased resolution over a wide field of view.
In some embodiments, a probe may include one, two, three or more apertures for ultrasound imaging.
In some embodiments as shown in
In some embodiments, a probe such as that illustrated in
Embodiments of multiple aperture ultrasound imaging methods using a point-source transmit signal will now be described with reference to
In some embodiments, subsequent insonifying pulses may be transmitted from each of the elements T1-Tn on the transmitting aperture 302 in a similar point-source fashion. Echoes may then be received by elements on the receive aperture(s) 302 after each insonifying pulse. An image may be formed by processing echoes from each transmit pulse. Although each individual image obtained from a transmit pulse may have a relatively low resolution, combining these images may provide a high resolution image.
In some embodiments, transmit elements may be operated in any desired sequential order, and need not follow a prescribed pattern. In some embodiments, receive functions may be performed by all elements in a receive array 302. In alternative embodiments, echoes may be received on only one or a select few elements of a receive array 302.
The data received by the receiving elements is a series of echoes reflected by objects within the target region. In order to generate an image, each received echo must be evaluated to determine the location of the object within the target region that reflected it (each reflected point may be referred to herein as a scatterer). For a scatterer point represented by coordinates (i,j) in
Assuming the speed of the ultrasound waves traveling through the target object is known, these distances can be translated into time delays which may be used to identify a location within the image corresponding to each received echo. When the speed of ultrasound in tissue is assumed to be uniform throughout the target object, it is possible to calculate the time delay from the onset of the transmit pulse to the time that an echo is received at the receive element. Thus, a given scatterer in the target object is the point for which a+b=the given time delay. The same method can be used to calculate delays for all points in the desired target to be imaged, creating a locus of points. As discussed in more detail in the '907 application, adjustments to time delays may be made in order to account for variations in the speed of sound through varying tissue paths.
A method of rendering the location of all of the scatterers in the target object, and thus forming a two dimensional cross section of the target object, will now be described with reference to
In some embodiments, the following pseudo code may be used to accumulate all of the information to be gathered from a transmit pulse from one transmit element (e.g., one element of T1 . . . Tn from aperture 302), and the consequent echoes received by one receive element (e.g., one element of R1 . . . Rm from aperture 304) in the arrangement of
delay.
A complete two dimensional image may be formed by repeating this process for every receive element in a receive aperture 304 (e.g., R1 . . . Rm). In some embodiments, it is possible to implement this code in parallel hardware resulting in real time image formation.
In some embodiments, image quality may be further improved by combining similar images resulting from pulses from other transmit elements. In some embodiments, the combination of images may be performed by a simple summation of the single point source pulse images (e.g., coherent addition). Alternatively, the combination may involve taking the absolute value of each element of the single point source pulse images first before summation (e.g., incoherent addition). Further details of such combinations, including corrections for variations in speed-of-sound through different ultrasound paths, are described in Applicant's prior U.S. Patent Applications referenced above.
As discussed above, because embodiments of an imaging system using a point source transmit signal and a multiple-aperture receive probe are capable of receiving an entire scan-plan image in response to a single insonifying pulse, a scan converter is not needed, and may therefore be omitted from an ultrasound imaging system. Having received a series of image frames in a similar manner, the image data may be processed and sent to a display for viewing by an operator. In addition to ultrasound imaging systems using point-source transmit signals, the following methods of selecting and displaying arbitrary m-mode paths may also be used with any other ultrasound imaging system, including phased array transmit systems, single-aperture probes, 3D probes, and probes in systems using synthetic aperture techniques.
Embodiments for Defining and Displaying Arbitrary M-mode Paths
In some embodiments, a sonographer may wish to simultaneously view changes along two or more separate M-mode paths. Thus in some embodiments, a user may define a plurality of M-mode paths 110, 112 as shown in
Multiple discontinuous M-mode paths and/or non-linear M-mode paths may be beneficial in viewing movement of multiple structures simultaneously. For example, a curve M-mode path may be beneficial when imaging a anatomic structures such as a moving valve, such as a tricuspid valve, an aortic valve or a mitral valve. In other embodiments, multiple simultaneous but dis-continuous m-mode lines may be used to simultaneously view the movement of multiple structures. For example, a first m-mode path may be drawn to view operation of a tricuspid valve, and a second M-mode path may be drawn to view operation of a mitral valve. Viewing the function of both valves simultaneously may provide substantial diagnostic benefits, such as allowing for precise calibration of a pacemaker.
Selection of an M-mode path generally involves identifying a group of image pixel locations which are to be presented over time as an M-mode graph. Identifying a group of pixels for an m-mode path may comprise identifying the coordinates of selected pixels in a coordinate system used by the video processing system. In some embodiments, M-mode selection and display methods as described herein may be performed in real-time using an ultrasound imaging system such as those illustrated in
In some embodiments, selection of a group of pixel locations for presentation as an M-mode path may be assisted by or entirely performed automatically, such as by using a computer aided detection (CAD) system configured to identify a desired anatomical or other feature through which an m-mode path may be desired. For example, US Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0021915 describes a system for automatic detection of structures in M-mode ultrasound imaging. In other embodiments, a desired M-mode path may be chosen by a user through any of several possible user interface interactions, several examples of which are provided below.
As will be clear to the skilled artisan, an imaging system or an image display system may include a variety of user interface devices through which a user may input information to or modify information or objects in a displayed image. Such user interface devices may comprise any of the following, trackballs, buttons, keys, keypads, sliders, dials, voice commands, touch screen, joystick, mouse, etc. The use of these and other user input devices will be clear to the skilled artisan.
In some embodiments, any arbitrary line or path in the image plane may be selected by a user as a line for M-mode display. In some embodiments, a linear path of defined length may be selected as an m-mode path. This may be facilitated through a number of user interface interactions, some examples of which are provided below.
In some embodiments, the ultrasound display may include a touch screen, and a user may define an M-mode path by simply drawing the desired path with a finger or stylus directly on the display screen. In other embodiments, a user may draw a freehand path using a separate user interface device such as a mouse or a drawing tablet. In some embodiments, after drawing a path of a desired shape, an M-mode path of the desired shape may be dragged across a display and/or rotated to a desired position.
In one embodiment of a user interface interaction, a linear m-mode path segment may be selected by first defining a line length, then defining a rotation angle, and then translating the line into a desired position. In some embodiments, further adjustments to the line length, rotation angle, and position may be made as needed. In some embodiments, defining a line length may comprise entering a numeric value with a numeric keypad or increasing/decreasing a numeric line length value with a scroll wheel, track ball, dial, slider, arrow keys or other input device. Similarly, in some embodiments, a rotation angle may be defined by entering a numeric value with a numeric keypad or any other input device. A rotation angle may be defined relative to any suitable coordinate system. For example, in some embodiments, a rotation angle of zero degrees may correspond to a three o-clock position (e.g., assuming the top of the image is 12 o-clock).
In some embodiments, numeric values of line length or rotation angle may not be displayed, instead only changes to a line length or rotation angle of the line may be shown on the display screen. In some embodiments, translating the line up, down, left or right within the image plane may be performed using arrow keys, a track ball, a mouse, touch screen, voice commands or other input devices.
In another embodiment of a user interface interaction, a desired linear m-mode path segment may be selected by defining or adjusting a line length, translating the line until a first end point is in a desired position, fixing the first end point and rotating the second end point until the line is rotated to the desired orientation and position.
In another embodiment of a user interface interaction, a desired linear m-mode path segment may be selected by first selecting a first end point, such as by positioning a cursor at a desired position on the image. A line length and rotation angle may then be defined and adjusted as needed. In some embodiments, a rotation angle may be defined by directing the system to pivot the line about the selected first end point. Alternatively, a user may select the second end point or another point along the line about which to pivot the line in order to define a desired rotation angle.
In another embodiment of a user interface interaction, a desired linear m-mode path segment may be selected by selecting a first end point with a cursor and then dragging the cursor in a desired direction to draw a line. In other embodiments, a line may be defined by selecting first and second end points, defining a line by joining the two points.
In any case, once a line is defined, either automatically or through a user interface interaction such as those described above, the length and rotation angle may be adjustable through further user interface interactions. For example, a user may define a pivot point about which to pivot the line in order to adjust a rotation angle. Similarly, a user may select a fixed point from which to increase or decrease the length of the line. Such fixed points and pivot points may be either one of the end points, or any other point along the line.
In some embodiments, a non-linear M-mode path may be defined through any of the above user interface interactions by joining linear segments to form any desired non-linear path made up of linear segments. In some embodiments, a user may choose to apply a radius to the M-mode path in areas adjacent intersections of linear segments. In some embodiments, such a radius may be applied automatically, or may be increased or decreased through a user interface interaction.
In other embodiments, a non-linear M-mode path may be defined by providing a user with a free-form drawing cursor with which the user may draw any non-linear path as desired. Further adjustments may then be made to the path, such as by selecting and dragging one or more individual points along the path to obtain a desired M-mode path.
As described above, multiple images may be formed for two or more separate simultaneous image windows showing different overlapping or non-overlapping portions of an insonified region of interest. Thus, in some embodiments, an M-mode path may be defined while a first image window is displayed, and a user may then zoom or pan the image to a second image window. In some embodiments, the system may be configured to continue displaying the data along the defined M-mode path even when the displayed B-mode image is changed to a different image window than the one in which the M-mode path was defined. For example, a user may zoom in to view a heart valve, and may define an M-mode path intersecting the valve in the zoomed-in image window. The user may then choose to zoom out to view the movement of the whole heart (or a different region of the heart) while continuing to monitor data along the M-mode line intersecting the heart valve.
In some embodiments, the system may store a definition of the image window in which the M-mode line was defined, and may allow a user to toggle between a B-mode image of the M-mode defining image window and a B-mode image of at least one other image window. In still further embodiments, the system may be configured to simultaneously display B-mode images of both the M-mode defining window and another image window (e.g., in a picture-in-picture mode or in a side-by-side view).
Any of the above user interface interactions may also be used to define am M-mode path through a displayed 3D volume. In some embodiments, defining an M-mode path from a 3D volume may also involve a step of rotating an image of a 3D volume before after or during any of the M-mode path defining user interface steps described above.
Although various embodiments are described herein with reference to ultrasound imaging of various anatomic structures, it will be understood that many of the methods and devices shown and described herein may also be used in other applications, such as imaging and evaluating non-anatomic structures and objects. For example, the ultrasound probes, systems and methods described herein may be used in non-destructive testing or evaluation of various mechanical objects, structural objects or materials, such as welds, pipes, beams, plates, pressure vessels, layered structures, etc. Therefore, references herein to medical or anatomic imaging targets such as blood, blood vessels, heart or other organs are provided merely as non-limiting examples of the nearly infinite variety of targets that may be imaged or evaluated using the various apparatus and techniques described herein.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow. In particular, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. Furthermore, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/581,583, titled “M-Mode Ultrasound Imaging Of Arbitrary Paths,” filed on Dec. 29, 2011, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/691,717, titled “Ultrasound Imaging System Memory Architecture,” filed on Aug. 21, 2012, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3174286 | Erickson | Mar 1965 | A |
3895381 | Kock | Jul 1975 | A |
4055988 | Dutton | Nov 1977 | A |
4072922 | Taner et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4097835 | Green | Jun 1978 | A |
4105018 | Greenleaf et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4259733 | Taner et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4271842 | Specht et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4325257 | Kino et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4327738 | Green et al. | May 1982 | A |
4333474 | Nigam | Jun 1982 | A |
4339952 | Foster | Jul 1982 | A |
4452084 | Taenzer | Jun 1984 | A |
4501279 | Seo | Feb 1985 | A |
4539847 | Paap | Sep 1985 | A |
4566459 | Umemura et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4567768 | Satoh et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4662222 | Johnson | May 1987 | A |
4669482 | Ophir | Jun 1987 | A |
4682497 | Sasaki | Jul 1987 | A |
4781199 | Hirama et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4817434 | Anderson | Apr 1989 | A |
4831601 | Breimesser et al. | May 1989 | A |
4893284 | Magrane | Jan 1990 | A |
4893628 | Angelsen | Jan 1990 | A |
5050588 | Grey et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5141738 | Rasor et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5161536 | Vilkomerson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5197475 | Antich et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5226019 | Bahorich | Jul 1993 | A |
5230339 | Charlebois | Jul 1993 | A |
5269309 | Fort et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278757 | Hoctor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293871 | Reinstein et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299576 | Shiba | Apr 1994 | A |
5301674 | Erikson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305756 | Entrekin et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5339282 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340510 | Bowen | Aug 1994 | A |
5345426 | Lipschutz | Sep 1994 | A |
5355888 | Kendall | Oct 1994 | A |
5398216 | Hall et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409010 | Beach et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5442462 | Guissin | Aug 1995 | A |
5503152 | Oakley et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515853 | Smith et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515856 | Olstad et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522393 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526815 | Granz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544659 | Banjanin | Aug 1996 | A |
5558092 | Unger et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5564423 | Mele et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568812 | Murashita et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570691 | Wright et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581517 | Gee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5625149 | Gururaja et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628320 | Teo | May 1997 | A |
5673697 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675550 | Ekhaus | Oct 1997 | A |
5720291 | Schwartz | Feb 1998 | A |
5720708 | Lu et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5744898 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769079 | Hossack | Jun 1998 | A |
5784334 | Sena et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785654 | Iinuma et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795297 | Daigle | Aug 1998 | A |
5797845 | Barabash et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798459 | Ohba et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820561 | Olstad et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838564 | Bahorich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850622 | Vassiliou et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862100 | VerWest | Jan 1999 | A |
5870691 | Partyka et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876342 | Chen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891038 | Seyed-Bolorforosh et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892732 | Gersztenkorn | Apr 1999 | A |
5916169 | Hanafy et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919139 | Lin | Jul 1999 | A |
5920285 | Benjamin | Jul 1999 | A |
5930730 | Marfurt et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940778 | Marfurt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964707 | Fenster et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969661 | Benjamin | Oct 1999 | A |
5999836 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007499 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013032 | Savord | Jan 2000 | A |
6014473 | Hossack et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6048315 | Chiao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049509 | Sonneland et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050943 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056693 | Haider | May 2000 | A |
6058074 | Swan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077224 | Lang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092026 | Bahorich et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122538 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123670 | Mo | Sep 2000 | A |
6129672 | Seward et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135960 | Holmberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6138075 | Yost | Oct 2000 | A |
6148095 | Prause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162175 | Marian, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166384 | Dentinger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166853 | Sapia et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193665 | Hall et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196739 | Silverbrook | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200266 | Shokrollahi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210335 | Miller | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213958 | Winder | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221019 | Kantorovich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231511 | Bae | May 2001 | B1 |
6238342 | Feleppa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246901 | Benaron | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251073 | Imran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264609 | Herrington et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266551 | Osadchy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278949 | Alam | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289230 | Chaiken et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304684 | Niczyporuk et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309356 | Ustuner et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324453 | Breed et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345539 | Rawes et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361500 | Masters | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363033 | Cole et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374185 | Taner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394955 | Perlitz | May 2002 | B1 |
6423002 | Hossack | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436046 | Napolitano et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449821 | Sudol et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450965 | Williams et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6468216 | Powers et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471650 | Powers et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475150 | Haddad | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6480790 | Calvert et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487502 | Taner | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499536 | Ellingsen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508768 | Hall et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508770 | Cai | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517484 | Wilk et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526163 | Halmann et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547732 | Jago | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551246 | Ustuner et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565510 | Haider | May 2003 | B1 |
6585647 | Winder | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604421 | Li | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614560 | Silverbrook | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620101 | Azzam et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652461 | Levkovitz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6668654 | Dubois et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672165 | Rather et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6681185 | Young et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690816 | Aylward et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692450 | Coleman | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695778 | Golland et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702745 | Smythe | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719693 | Richard | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728567 | Rather et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6752762 | DeJong et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755787 | Hossack et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6780152 | Ustuner et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790182 | Eck et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6837853 | Marian | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843770 | Sumanaweera | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847737 | Kouri et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6854332 | Alleyne | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6932767 | Landry et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7033320 | Von Behren et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7087023 | Daft et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104956 | Christopher | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7217243 | Takeuchi | May 2007 | B2 |
7221867 | Silverbrook | May 2007 | B2 |
7231072 | Yamano et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7269299 | Schroeder | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283652 | Mendonca et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285094 | Nohara et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313053 | Wodnicki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7366704 | Reading et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7402136 | Hossack et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410469 | Talish et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7415880 | Renzel | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7443765 | Thomenius et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444875 | Wu et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7447535 | Lavi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7448998 | Robinson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7466848 | Metaxas et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469096 | Silverbrook | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474778 | Shinomura et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481577 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7491171 | Barthe et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497828 | Wilk et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7497830 | Li | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510529 | Chou et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514851 | Wilser et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7549962 | Dreschel et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574026 | Rasche et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7625343 | Cao et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637869 | Sudol | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668583 | Fegert et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674228 | Williams et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682311 | Simopoulos et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7699776 | Walker et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722541 | Cai | May 2010 | B2 |
7744532 | Ustuner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750311 | Daghighian | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7785260 | Umemura et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787680 | Ahn et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7806828 | Stringer | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819810 | Stringer et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822250 | Yao et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824337 | Abe et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7833163 | Cai | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837624 | Hossack et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7846097 | Jones et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850613 | Stribling | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862508 | Davies et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876945 | Lötjönen | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7887486 | Ustuner et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901358 | Mehi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907758 | Hill et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914451 | Davies | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919906 | Cerofolini | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926350 | Kröning et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927280 | Davidsen | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7972271 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7984637 | Ao et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7984651 | Randall et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002705 | Napolitano et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8007439 | Specht | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8057392 | Hossack et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057393 | Yao et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8079263 | Randall et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8079956 | Azuma et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088067 | Vortman et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8088068 | Yao et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8088071 | Hwang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105239 | Specht | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8135190 | Bae et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157737 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8182427 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8202219 | Luo et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8277383 | Specht | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8279705 | Choi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8412307 | Willis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419642 | Sandrin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8478382 | Burnside et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8532951 | Roy et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8582848 | Funka-Lea et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8627724 | Papadopoulos et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634615 | Brabec | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8672846 | Napolitano et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020035864 | Paltieli et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020087071 | Schmitz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111568 | Bukshpan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020161299 | Prater et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030028111 | Vaezy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040669 | Grass et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030228053 | Li et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040054283 | Corey et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068184 | Trahey et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100163 | Baumgartner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111028 | Abe et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122313 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122322 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127793 | Mendlein et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138565 | Trucco | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144176 | Yoden | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236217 | Cerwin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236223 | Barnes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004449 | Mitschke et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053305 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054910 | Tremblay et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090743 | Kawashima et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090745 | Steen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111846 | Steinbacher et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113689 | Gritzky | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113694 | Haugen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124883 | Hunt | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131300 | Bakircioglu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147297 | McLaughlin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165312 | Knowles et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050203404 | Freiburger | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215883 | Hundley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240125 | Makin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252295 | Fink et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281447 | Moreau-Gobard et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288588 | Weber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060062447 | Rinck et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074313 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074315 | Liang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074320 | Yoo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079759 | Vaillant et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079778 | Mo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079782 | Beach et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094962 | Clark | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111634 | Wu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122506 | Davies et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173327 | Kim | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060262291 | Hess et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262961 | Holsing et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016022 | Blalock et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016044 | Blalock et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070036414 | Georgescu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055155 | Owen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078345 | Mo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088213 | Poland | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138157 | Dane et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161898 | Hao et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070161904 | Urbano | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167752 | Proulx et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167824 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070232914 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238985 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242567 | Daft et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080110261 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080110263 | Klessel et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112265 | Urbano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114241 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114245 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114246 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114247 | Urbano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114248 | Urbano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114249 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114250 | Urbano et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114251 | Weymer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114252 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114253 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114255 | Schwartz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125659 | Wilser et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181479 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183075 | Govari et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188747 | Randall et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188750 | Randall et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194957 | Hoctor et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194958 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194959 | Wang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208061 | Halmann | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242996 | Hall et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249408 | Palmeri et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255452 | Entrekin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269604 | Boctor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269613 | Summers et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275344 | Glide-Hurst et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285819 | Konofagou et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287787 | Sauer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294045 | Ellington et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294050 | Shinomura et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294052 | Wilser et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306382 | Guracar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306386 | Baba et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319317 | Kamiyama et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010459 | Garbini et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012393 | Choi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016163 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018445 | Schers et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024039 | Wang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036780 | Abraham | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043206 | Towfiq et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048519 | Hossack et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069681 | Lundberg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069686 | Daft et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069692 | Cooley et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099483 | Rybyanets | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112095 | Daigle | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131797 | Jeong et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143680 | Yao et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148012 | Altmann et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150094 | Van Velsor et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182237 | Angelsen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198134 | Hashimoto et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203997 | Ustuner | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208080 | Grau et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090259128 | Stribling | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264760 | Lazebnik et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090306510 | Hashiba et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326379 | Daigle et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010354 | Skerl et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016725 | Thiele | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063397 | Wagner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063399 | Walker et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069751 | Hazard et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069756 | Ogasawara et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106431 | Baba et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109481 | Buccafusca | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121193 | Fukukita et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121196 | Hwang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130855 | Lundberg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168566 | Bercoff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168578 | Garson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174194 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217124 | Cooley | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100240994 | Zheng | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249570 | Carson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249596 | Magee | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256488 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262013 | Smith et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100266176 | Masumoto et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268503 | Specht et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286525 | Osumi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286527 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100310143 | Rao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324418 | El-Aklouk et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324423 | El-Aklouk et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329521 | Beymer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005322 | Ustuner | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016977 | Guracar | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021915 | Feng | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021920 | Shafir et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021923 | Daft et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110033098 | Richter et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044133 | Tokita | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066030 | Yao | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098565 | Masuzawa | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112400 | Emery et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112404 | Gourevitch | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125017 | Ramamurthy et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110178400 | Specht et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110201933 | Specht et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110270088 | Shiina | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301470 | Sato et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306886 | Daft et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319764 | Okada et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120004545 | Ziv-Ari et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035482 | Kim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036934 | Kröning et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057428 | Specht et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120085173 | Papadopoulos et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095343 | Smith et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095347 | Adam et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101378 | Lee | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120114210 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116226 | Specht | May 2012 | A1 |
20120121150 | Murashita | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137778 | Kitazawa et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120141002 | Urbano et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165670 | Shi et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179044 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120226201 | Clark et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120235998 | Smith-Casem et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243763 | Wen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253194 | Tamura | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265075 | Pedrizzetti et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277585 | Koenig et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035595 | Specht | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130076207 | Krohn et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079639 | Hoctor et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083628 | Qiao et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088122 | Krohn et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130116561 | Rothberg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130131516 | Katsuyama | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144165 | Ebbini et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130204136 | Duric et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204137 | Roy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130247350 | Specht et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258805 | Hansen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130261463 | Chiang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140073921 | Specht et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140135626 | Specht | May 2014 | A1 |
20140243673 | Anand et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150045668 | Smith et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101190134 | Jun 2008 | CN |
102123668 | Jul 2011 | CN |
1949856 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2058796 | May 2009 | EP |
2101191 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2182352 | May 2010 | EP |
2187813 | May 2010 | EP |
2198785 | Jun 2010 | EP |
1757955 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2325672 | May 2011 | EP |
1462819 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2356941 | Aug 2011 | EP |
1979739 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2385391 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2294400 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2453256 | May 2012 | EP |
1840594 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2514368 | Oct 2012 | EP |
1850743 | Dec 2012 | EP |
1594404 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2026280 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2851662 | Aug 2004 | FR |
S49-11189 | Jan 1974 | JP |
S54-44375 | Apr 1979 | JP |
S55-103839 | Aug 1980 | JP |
59-101143 | Jun 1984 | JP |
S59-174151 | Oct 1984 | JP |
S60-13109 | Jan 1985 | JP |
S60-68836 | Apr 1985 | JP |
2-501431 | May 1990 | JP |
4-67856 | Mar 1992 | JP |
05-042138 | Feb 1993 | JP |
6-125908 | May 1994 | JP |
7-051266 | Feb 1995 | JP |
08-252253 | Oct 1996 | JP |
9-103429 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9-201361 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10-216128 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-089833 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2001-245884 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-209894 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-253548 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-253549 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004-167092 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-215987 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-337457 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004-351214 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-523792 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-526539 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-122657 | May 2006 | JP |
2008-122209 | May 2008 | JP |
2008-513763 | May 2008 | JP |
2008-259541 | Oct 2008 | JP |
20105375 | Jan 2010 | JP |
1020090103408 | Oct 2009 | KR |
WO 9218054 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9800719 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO02084594 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO2005009245 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006114735 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007127147 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2009060182 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2010017445 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010095094 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO2011057252 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011064688 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO2011100697 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO2011123529 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2012028896 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO2012049124 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012049612 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012078639 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012091280 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO2012112540 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2012131340 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO2012160541 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2013059358 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO2013109965 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO2013116807 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116809 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116851 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116854 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013116866 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2013128301 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Smith et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,015 entitled “Alignment of ultrasound transducer arrays and multiple aperture probe assembly,” filed Mar. 13, 2014. |
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/279,052 entitled “Ultrasound imaging using apparent point-source transmit transducer,” filed May 15, 2014. |
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/773,340 entitled “Determining Material Stiffness Using Multiple Aperture Ultrasound,” filed Feb. 21, 2013. |
Call et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/850,823 entitled “Systems and methods for improving ultrasound image quality by applying weighting factors,” filed Mar. 26, 2013. |
Belevich et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,701 entitled “Calibration of Multiple Aperture Ultrasound Probes,” filed Aug. 12, 2013. |
Call et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/971,689 entitled “Ultrasound Imaging System Memory Architecture,” filed Aug. 20, 2013. |
Cristianini et al.; An Introduction to Support Vector Machines; Cambridge University Press; pp. 93-111; Mar. 2000. |
Du et al.; User parameter free approaches to multistatic adaptive ultrasound imaging; 5th IEEE International Symposium; pp. 1287-1290, May 2008. |
Feigenbaum, Harvey, M.D.; Echocardiography; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia; 5th Ed.; pp. 428, 484; Feb. 1994. |
Haykin, Simon; Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (2nd Ed.); Prentice Hall; pp. 156-187; Jul. 16, 1998. |
Kramb et al,.; Considerations for using phased array ultrasonics in a fully automated inspection system. Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 23, ed. D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, pp. 817-825, (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filed and any foreign priority date) 2004. |
Ledesma-Carbayo et al.; Spatio-temporal nonrigid registration for ultrasound cardiac motion estimation; IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging; vol. 24; No. 9; Sep. 2005. |
Leotta et al.; Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiography by rapid imaging . . . ; J American Society of Echocardiography; vol. 10; No. 8; pp. 830-839; Oct. 1997. |
Morrison et al.; A probabilistic neural network based image segmentation network for magnetic resonance images; Proc. Conf. Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; vol. 3; pp. 60-65; Jun. 1992. |
Nadkarni et al.; Cardiac motion synchronization for 3D cardiac ultrasound imaging; Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario; Jun. 2002. |
Press et al.; Cubic spline interpolation; §3.3 in “Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing”, 2nd Ed.; Cambridge, England; Cambridge University Press; pp. 107-110; Sep. 1992. |
Sakas et al.; Preprocessing and volume rendering of 3D ultrasonic data; IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications; pp. 47-54, Jul. 1995. |
Sapia et al.; Deconvolution of ultrasonic waveforms using an adaptive wiener filter; Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation; vol. 13A; Plenum Press; pp. 855-862; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filed and any foreign priority date) 1994. |
Sapia et al.; Ultrasound image deconvolution using adaptive inverse filtering; 12 IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, CBMS, pp. 248-253; Jun. 1999. |
Sapia, Mark Angelo; Multi-dimensional deconvolution of optical microscope and ultrasound imaging using adaptive least-mean-square (LMS) inverse filtering; Ph.D. Dissertation; University of Connecticut; Jan. 2000. |
Smith et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system. 1. Transducer design and beam steering; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 100-108; Mar. 1991. |
Specht et al.; Deconvolution techniques for digital longitudinal tomography; SPIE; vol. 454; presented at Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine XII; pp. 319-325; Jun. 1984. |
Specht et al.; Experience with adaptive PNN and adaptive GRNN; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; vol. 2; pp. 1203-1208; Orlando, FL; Jun. 1994. |
Specht, D.F.; A general regression neural network; IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks; vol. 2.; No. 6; Nov. 1991. |
Specht, D.F.; Blind deconvolution of motion blur using LMS inverse filtering; Lockheed Independent Research (unpublished); Jun. 23, 1975. |
Specht, D.F.; Enhancements to probabilistic neural networks; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; Jun. 1992. |
Specht, D.F.; GRNN with double clustering; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. Neural Networks; Vancouver, Canada; Jul. 16-21, 2006. |
Specht, D.F.; Probabilistic neural networks; Pergamon Press; Neural Networks; vol. 3; pp. 109-118; Feb. 1990. |
Von Ramm et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging-System. 2. Parallel processing and image display; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 109-115; Mar. 1991. |
Wells, P.N.T.; Biomedical ultrasonics; Academic Press; London, New York, San Francisco; pp. 124-125; Mar. 1977. |
Widrow et al.; Adaptive signal processing; Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ; pp. 99-116; Mar. 1985. |
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/690,989 entitled “Motion Detection Using Ping-Based and Multiple Aperture Doppler Ultrasound,” filed Nov. 30, 2012. |
Hendee et al.; Medical Imaging Physics; Wiley-Liss, Inc. 4th Edition; Chap. 19-22; pp. 303-353; © 2002 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filed and any foreign priority date). |
Li et al.; An efficient speckle tracking algorithm for ultrasonic imaging; 24; pp. 215-228; Oct. 1, 2002. |
UCLA Academic Technology; SPSS learning module: How can I analyze a subset of my data; 6 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/modules/subset—analyze.htm) Nov. 26, 2001. |
Wikipedia; Point cloud; 2 pages; retrieved Nov. 24, 2014 from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Point—cloud&oldid=472583138). |
Wikipedia; Curve fitting; 5 pages; retrieved from the internet (http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve—fitting) Dec. 19, 2010. |
Smith et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/595,083 entitled “Concave ultrasound transducers and 3D arrays,” filed Jan. 12, 2015. |
Specht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/078,311 entitled “Imaging with Multiple Aperture Medical Ultrasound and Synchronization of Add-On Systems,” filed Nov. 12, 2013. |
Specht, D. F.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/157,257 entitled “Method and Apparatus to Produce Ultrasonic Images Using Multiple Apertures,” filed Jan. 16, 2014. |
Wikipedia; Speed of sound; 17 pages; retrieved from the internet (http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed—of—sound) Feb. 15, 2011. |
Abeysekera et al.; Alignment and calibration of dual ultrasound transducers using a wedge phantom; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; 37(2); pp. 271-279; Feb. 2011. |
Carson et al.; Measurement of photoacoustic transducer position by robotic source placement and nonlinear parameter estimation; Biomedical Optics (BiOS); International Society for Optics and Photonics (9th Conf. on Biomedical Thermoacoustics, Optoacoustics, and Acousto-optics; vol. 6856; 9 pages; Feb. 28, 2008. |
Chen et al.; Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field; IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing; 50(8); pp. 1843-1854; Aug. 2002. |
Chen et al.; Source localization and tracking of a wideband source using a randomly distributed beamforming sensor array; International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications; 16(3); pp. 259-272; Fall 2002. |
Fernandez et al.; High resolution ultrasound beamforming using synthetic and adaptive imaging techniques; Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; Washington, D.C.; pp. 433-436; Jul. 7-10, 2002. |
Gazor et al.; Wideband multi-source beamforming with array location calibration and direction finding; Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP-95; Detroit, MI; vol. 3 IEEE; pp. 1904-1907; May 9-12, 1995. |
Heikkila et al.; A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction; Proceedings IEEE Computer Scociety Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; San Juan; pp. 1106-1112; Jun. 17-19, 1997. |
Hsu et al.; Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration; CUED/F-INFENG/TR 565; Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; 14 pages; Sep. 2006. |
Khamene et al.; A novel phantom-less spatial and temporal ultrasound calibration method; Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI (Proceedings 8th Int. Conf.); Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Palm Springs, CA; pp. 65-72; Oct. 26-29, 2005. |
Slavine et al.; Construction, calibration and evaluation of a tissue phantom with reproducible optical properties for investigations in light emission tomography; Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop; Dallas, TX; IEEE pp. 122-125; Nov. 11-12, 2007. |
Urban et al; Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system; IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; 58(6); pp. 1169-1181; Jun. 2011 (Author Manuscript). |
Urban et al; Implementation of vibro-acoustography on a clinical ultrasound system; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); pp. 326-329; Oct. 14, 2010. |
Wang et al.; Photoacoustic tomography of biological tissues with high cross-section resolution: reconstruction and experiment; Medical Physics; 29(12); pp. 2799-2805; Dec. 2002. |
Yang et al.; Time-of-arrival calibration for improving the microwave breast cancer imaging; 2011 IEEE Topical Conf. on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and sensing Systems (BioWireleSS); Phoenix, AZ; pp. 67-70; Jan. 16-19, 2011. |
Opretzka et al.; A high-frequency ultrasound imaging system combining limited-angle spatial compounding and model-based synthetic aperture focusing; IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE, US; 58(7); pp. 1355-1365; Jul. 2, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130172743 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61581583 | Dec 2011 | US | |
61691717 | Aug 2012 | US |