The present disclosure relates to machinery with attachments having a control mechanism that minimizes overloading the attachment.
Typically, machine attachments are constructed such that the machine cannot apply enough force to the attachment to cause the attachment to prematurely fail. For example, a digger boom on a trencher is traditionally designed and engineered to withstand the maximum amount of force that can possibly be applied to it by the tractor that it is configured to be used with. Digger booms and other machine attachments are traditionally designed to be used with a particular size machine. However, it can be desirable to use relatively light attachments on relatively heavy machines, or to provide interchangeable machine attachments.
The present disclosure provides a machine configured so that its ground speed is at least in part dependent on the measured force that is applied to an attachment attached thereto. The present disclosure also provides an attachment for a machine that is configured to provide feedback to the machine it is configured to be attached to, wherein the feedback is representative of the force applied to the attachment. The present disclosure also provides a method of automatically controlling the ground speed of a machine based on feedback measured in an attachment attached to the machine.
Machines with tool attachments are commonly used in construction related applications. The machine typically includes a chassis, which is also commonly referred to as a frame, and is supported on tires or tracks. An engine supported on the chassis generates power to run the tires or tracks as well as any attachments connected to the chassis. The term “attachments” is used herein to refer to tools that are configured to be connected to the chassis. Attachments include, but are not limited to, backhoe, diggers with chains, plows, lift buckets, rock wheels, terrain levelers, etc. Trenching type attachments include, but are not limited to, attachments that are configured to create a trench in the ground (e.g., rock wheels, diggers with chains, etc.).
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment the orientation of the boom 16 is controlled by actuating a hydraulic cylinder 22. The further the hydraulic cylinder 22 is extended, the deeper the boom 16 is plunged into the ground (
In the example embodiment, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 varies during the trenching operation depending on a number of factors. Assuming the trencher 10 is moving at a constant ground speed (e.g., 5 fpm), the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 will be greater when the trencher moves through denser soil than when it moves through less dense soil. The load on the boom 16 is proportional to the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22. Accordingly, the variations in the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 represent variations of the load on the boom 16.
In the depicted embodiment, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 is generally correlated to the variation in pressure of the hydraulic fluid that drives the chain 18. However, since the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the chain 18 is dependent on the engagement between the chain 18 and the material it contacts, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may in some cases be very different than the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the chain. For example, if the trencher 10 moves over a large boulder, the chain 18 may slip rather than bite into the rock, and the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the chain 18 may be relatively low while the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may be extremely high. Accordingly, monitoring the pressure in the chain drive as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/770,940 (US Pub. No. 2009/0000157), which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference, may not be sufficient to detect overloading of the boom.
In the depicted embodiment, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 is generally correlated to the variation in the pressure of the hydraulic fluid that drives the tracks 14. However, since the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the tracks 14 is dependent on whether the trencher 10 is moving uphill (relatively higher pressure) or downhill (relatively lower pressure), the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may in some cases be very different than the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the tracks 14. For example, if the trencher 10 is moving down a steep inclined, the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the tracks 14 may be relatively low while the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may be extremely high.
In the depicted embodiment, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may or may not be correlated to the variation in engine speed of the trencher 10. If the engine of the trencher 10 is relatively low power, the engine speed decreases when the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 is high. However, when the engine is relatively high power, the increase in load on the digger 12 will not draw down the engine speed. Also, since the engine would also typically power the tracks 14 and the rotation of the chain 18, the engine speed is also dependent on the variation in the load on these functions which, as described above, may or may not correlate with the load on the hydraulic cylinders 22. Therefore, controlling the ground speed based on engine speed as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/770,909 (US Pub. No. 2009/0000156), which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference, may not be sufficient to detect overloading the boom.
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment, the pressure in the lock out portion is measured, and the pressure data is sent to a control processor 30 that determines whether the pressure is high enough to warrant slowing the ground speed of the trencher 10 and, if so, by how much should the ground speed be slowed. For example, if the measured pressure is within a predetermined range, the ground speed may be slowed proportional to the magnitude of the pressure, and if the measured pressure is high enough, the trencher may be stopped.
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment the transducer 32 measures the hydraulic pressure in a portion of the hydraulic circuit that can be locked out from the rest of the hydraulic circuit. The portion that can be locked out is referred to herein as the locked out portion. In the depicted configuration the locked out portion includes the hydraulic cylinder 22 and the hydraulic lines that extend from the hydraulic cylinder to check valve A and check valve B. The pressure in the locked out portion can be different than the pressure in other components connected to the pump 36 or tank 35. In the depicted embodiment the locked out portion of the hydraulic circuit is selectively in fluid communication with a relief valve 38. However, if the pressure in the depicted portions of the hydraulic circuit outside of the locked out portion exceeds a predetermined value (e.g., 2500 psi), the relief valve allows hydraulic fluid to escape from the circuit to prevent overload.
In the depicted orientation the locked out portion is shown locked out (isolated from the rest of the circuit including the relief valve 38) thereby preventing the cylinder 22 from extending or retracting. In the depicted configuration and orientation of the valve 42, flow from the pump 36 bypasses the cylinder 22 via the power beyond path 40. When the valve 42 is moved schematically to the left, hydraulic fluid flows through check valve A and the cylinder 22 extends. When the valve 42 is moved schematically to the right, the hydraulic fluid flows through check valve B and the cylinder 22 is retracted. In the depicted embodiment, when the valve 42 is moved either to the left or right, the locked out portion is in fluid communication (not isolated) from the rest of the hydraulic circuit including the relief valve 38.
As discussed above, the data that is representative of the pressure of the hydraulic cylinder 22 measured by the transducer 32, which is representative of the load on the boom 16, is sent to the computer network 30 to be processed. In one embodiment of the present disclosure averages of the data received on a ⅓ second sliding average (the data measured in any ⅓ of second in time is averaged) is calculated. The calculated average pressure is compared to a lower and upper pressure limit (e.g., 1800 psi lower limit and 2300 psi upper limit).
If the calculated average pressure is lower than the lower pressure limit, the controller multiplies the value by 1, thereby doing nothing to change the ground speed (via the ground drive pump 44 or ground drive motor 46). When the calculated average pressure is between the lower and upper limits, the control signal output to the pump 44 is multiplied by a number between one and zero, proportional to the distance between the two limits, with zero being the multiplier at the upper limit. If the calculated average pressure exceeds the upper limit, the control signal output to the pump 44 is multiplied by zero which signals the machine to stop. Accordingly, the flow rate from the pump 44 to the ground drive motor 46, which dictates the speed of the tracks 14, changes depending on the data measured from the transducer 32.
It should be appreciated that the above description is simply one of many examples of embodiments of the present disclosure. For example, the present disclosure is not limited to trenchers. The present disclosure relates to any machines having tool attachments that could fail if overloaded, for example, it relates to any machine having tool attachments with a boom that extends from the machine wherein the tool attachment could fail if the machine applies too much load to the boom.
Also, it should be appreciated that there are many alternative ways to apply the principles of the present disclosure to trenchers. For example, in alternative embodiments of the present disclosure the orientation of the attachment relative to the machine can be controlled by hydraulic cylinders that are part of the machine itself or directly connected to the machine and the attachment, rather than part of the attachment as shown. In addition, the attachment can be different. For example, the attachment could be a rock wheel rather than a digger with a chain. In other alternative embodiments the load on the attachment can be measured using a strain gauge that is attached to a member that supports the attachment relative to the machine. For example, the load on a vibratory plow attachment may be measured via a strain gauge, and the speed of the tractor attached thereto can be adjusted accordingly. Many other variations in accordance with the present disclosure are also possible.
The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/423,437 filed Apr. 14, 2009 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/168,146 filed Apr. 9, 2009, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2804751 | Schroeder | Sep 1957 | A |
3605903 | Glesmann | Sep 1971 | A |
3726191 | Johnston et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3750762 | Eaton | Aug 1973 | A |
3876020 | Barsby | Apr 1975 | A |
3892286 | Clevenger et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
4013875 | McGlynn | Mar 1977 | A |
4076090 | Krusche et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4111066 | Kendrick | Sep 1978 | A |
4173836 | Paurat | Nov 1979 | A |
4175628 | Cornell et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4255883 | Ealy | Mar 1981 | A |
4277898 | Flippin | Jul 1981 | A |
4301910 | Price | Nov 1981 | A |
4423785 | Kurihara et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4455770 | Presley | Jun 1984 | A |
4541497 | Riediger et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4611527 | Breeden | Sep 1986 | A |
4662684 | Marten | May 1987 | A |
4677579 | Radomilovich | Jun 1987 | A |
4699239 | Ishino et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702358 | Mueller et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4715012 | Mueller, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4727353 | Ruhter | Feb 1988 | A |
4896442 | Stiff et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4945221 | Nielsen et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5065320 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5065326 | Sahm | Nov 1991 | A |
5088020 | Nishida et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5101919 | Ossi | Apr 1992 | A |
5182713 | Kitoh | Jan 1993 | A |
5212998 | Testerman | May 1993 | A |
5293944 | Matsumoto | Mar 1994 | A |
5297019 | Zuehlke | Mar 1994 | A |
5297649 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
RE34576 | Camilleri | Apr 1994 | E |
5325933 | Matsushita | Jul 1994 | A |
5347448 | Nam | Sep 1994 | A |
5361211 | Lee et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5363304 | Awano et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5398766 | Nakayama et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5424623 | Allen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5456333 | Brandt et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5477678 | Shirai et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5509220 | Cooper | Apr 1996 | A |
5544055 | Cooper | Aug 1996 | A |
5574642 | Cooper | Nov 1996 | A |
5576962 | Ferguson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5590041 | Cooper | Dec 1996 | A |
5681242 | Bates | Oct 1997 | A |
5737993 | Cobo et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5768811 | Cooper | Jun 1998 | A |
5893677 | Haehn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5918527 | Haga et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931078 | Kropp | Aug 1999 | A |
5975214 | Okamura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6022292 | Goodnight | Feb 2000 | A |
6317669 | Kurenuma et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351900 | DeWind | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371566 | Haehn | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6427107 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6728619 | Adachi et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729050 | Whitten et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6766236 | Lamela et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6804903 | Cooper | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823672 | Nakamura | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6851495 | Sprinkle et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6901324 | Rose et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6948265 | Unzicker et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7069722 | Lonn | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077345 | Byram et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7260931 | Egelja et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273125 | Schuh | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7287620 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7539570 | Normann | May 2009 | B2 |
7630793 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7695071 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7762013 | Hartwick | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778756 | Hartwick et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797934 | Bacon et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7930843 | Hartwick | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8042290 | Hartwick | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8347529 | Berg et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
20020139013 | Hammerle | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040098984 | Duell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040211092 | Barnes | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050004734 | Cripps | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050177291 | Strashny et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050278100 | Porter | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011400 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060235595 | Sawada | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070240928 | Coltson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090000154 | Hartwick | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090000156 | Hartwick et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090000157 | Hartwick | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090178816 | Piekutowski et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
27 00 950 | Mar 1978 | DE |
28 00 631 | Dec 1978 | DE |
0 803 614 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0 905 325 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1 260 716 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1 914 354 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1596736 | Jul 1970 | FR |
2222498 | Oct 1974 | FR |
3-70683 | Mar 1991 | JP |
WO 9102853 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO 9402346 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO 03068660 | Aug 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
DC2 Microcontroller, Sauer Sundstrand, 3 pages (Mar. 1993). |
DP600 Series Graphical Terminals, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 17, 2009 relating to PCT Application PCT/US2008/068346. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 5, 2008 relating to PCT/US2008/068355. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 7, 2008 relating to PCT Application PCT/US2008/068335. |
Introducing Tesmec's all-new Mechanical Series, Tesmec, 2 pages pages (Publicly known at least as early as Jun. 29, 2007). |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees with Partial International Search mailed Nov. 4, 2008 relating to PCT Application PCT/US2008/068346. |
IX024-010-00000 Plus+1 Input Module, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006). |
MC050-010-00000 Plus+1 Controller, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006). |
MC050-020-00000 Plus+1 Controller, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006). |
MCE101C Load Controller, Sauer Sundstrand, 3 pages (Feb. 1990). |
Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2009 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/770,909. |
Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2010 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/770,940. |
OX024-010-00000 Plus+1 Output Module, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006). |
Plus+1 Guide Starter Kit and Development System, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006). |
Plus+1 Guide User Manual, Sauer Danfoss, pp. 1-450 (Apr. 2007). |
European Search Report mailed Dec. 7, 2010 relating to European Application 10186517.8. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees with Partial International Search mailed Jul. 10, 2009 relating to PCT Application PCT/US2009/040503. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130091743 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61168146 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12423437 | Apr 2009 | US |
Child | 13709886 | US |