Machine attachment based speed control system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8819966
  • Patent Number
    8,819,966
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 10, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 2, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
The present disclosure provides a machine configured so that its ground speed is at least in part dependent on the measured force that is applied to an attachment attached thereto. The present disclosure also provides an attachment for a machine that is configured to provide feedback to the machine it is configured to be attached to, wherein the feedback is representative of the force applied to the attachment. The present disclosure also provides a method of automatically controlling the ground speed of a machine based on feedback measured in an attachment attached to the machine.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to machinery with attachments having a control mechanism that minimizes overloading the attachment.


BACKGROUND

Typically, machine attachments are constructed such that the machine cannot apply enough force to the attachment to cause the attachment to prematurely fail. For example, a digger boom on a trencher is traditionally designed and engineered to withstand the maximum amount of force that can possibly be applied to it by the tractor that it is configured to be used with. Digger booms and other machine attachments are traditionally designed to be used with a particular size machine. However, it can be desirable to use relatively light attachments on relatively heavy machines, or to provide interchangeable machine attachments.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure provides a machine configured so that its ground speed is at least in part dependent on the measured force that is applied to an attachment attached thereto. The present disclosure also provides an attachment for a machine that is configured to provide feedback to the machine it is configured to be attached to, wherein the feedback is representative of the force applied to the attachment. The present disclosure also provides a method of automatically controlling the ground speed of a machine based on feedback measured in an attachment attached to the machine.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a machine with an attachment according to the principles of the present disclosure;



FIG. 2 is a side view of the machine of FIG. 1 with a digger attachment shown in a generally horizontal orientation;



FIG. 3 is a side view of the machine of FIG. 1 with a digger attachment shown in a lowered orientation;



FIG. 4 is a combined hydraulic circuit diagram and control schematic of the machine with an attachment shown in FIG. 1; and



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing an embodiment of the control system according to the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Machines with tool attachments are commonly used in construction related applications. The machine typically includes a chassis, which is also commonly referred to as a frame, and is supported on tires or tracks. An engine supported on the chassis generates power to run the tires or tracks as well as any attachments connected to the chassis. The term “attachments” is used herein to refer to tools that are configured to be connected to the chassis. Attachments include, but are not limited to, backhoe, diggers with chains, plows, lift buckets, rock wheels, terrain levelers, etc. Trenching type attachments include, but are not limited to, attachments that are configured to create a trench in the ground (e.g., rock wheels, diggers with chains, etc.).


Referring to FIGS. 1-3, an example of a machine having an attachment according to the present disclosure is shown and described. In the depicted embodiment the machine is a trencher 10 having a digger 12 attachment, a vibratory plow attachment 24, and a backfill attachment 26. The trencher 10 is supported on four tracks 14. The digger 12 includes a boom 16 and a chain 18 that rotates around the boom 16. In operation the chain 18 is rotated and the boom 16 is lowered into the ground to a particular depth. The trencher 10 is then driven by an operator along a path that is in a direction that is generally away from the distal end 20 of the digger 12, thereby forming a trench behind the trencher 10.


In the depicted embodiment the orientation of the boom 16 is controlled by actuating a hydraulic cylinder 22. The further the hydraulic cylinder 22 is extended, the deeper the boom 16 is plunged into the ground (FIG. 3). For a more detailed description of controlling a boom orientation using a hydraulic cylinder see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/771,171 (US Pub. No. 2009/0000154), which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. In applications where it is desirable to trench at a constant depth, the hydraulic cylinder 22 is locked off from the hydraulic circuit once the desired cut depth is reached. Allowing additional fluid flow into the cylinder 22 would result in the boom 16 plunging deeper than desired, and allowing additional fluid flow out of the cylinder 22 would result in the boom 16 cutting shallower than desired.


In the example embodiment, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 varies during the trenching operation depending on a number of factors. Assuming the trencher 10 is moving at a constant ground speed (e.g., 5 fpm), the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 will be greater when the trencher moves through denser soil than when it moves through less dense soil. The load on the boom 16 is proportional to the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22. Accordingly, the variations in the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 represent variations of the load on the boom 16.


In the depicted embodiment, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 is generally correlated to the variation in pressure of the hydraulic fluid that drives the chain 18. However, since the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the chain 18 is dependent on the engagement between the chain 18 and the material it contacts, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may in some cases be very different than the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the chain. For example, if the trencher 10 moves over a large boulder, the chain 18 may slip rather than bite into the rock, and the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the chain 18 may be relatively low while the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may be extremely high. Accordingly, monitoring the pressure in the chain drive as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/770,940 (US Pub. No. 2009/0000157), which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference, may not be sufficient to detect overloading of the boom.


In the depicted embodiment, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 is generally correlated to the variation in the pressure of the hydraulic fluid that drives the tracks 14. However, since the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the tracks 14 is dependent on whether the trencher 10 is moving uphill (relatively higher pressure) or downhill (relatively lower pressure), the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may in some cases be very different than the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the tracks 14. For example, if the trencher 10 is moving down a steep inclined, the pressure in the hydraulic fluid that drives the tracks 14 may be relatively low while the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may be extremely high.


In the depicted embodiment, the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 may or may not be correlated to the variation in engine speed of the trencher 10. If the engine of the trencher 10 is relatively low power, the engine speed decreases when the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 22 is high. However, when the engine is relatively high power, the increase in load on the digger 12 will not draw down the engine speed. Also, since the engine would also typically power the tracks 14 and the rotation of the chain 18, the engine speed is also dependent on the variation in the load on these functions which, as described above, may or may not correlate with the load on the hydraulic cylinders 22. Therefore, controlling the ground speed based on engine speed as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/770,909 (US Pub. No. 2009/0000156), which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference, may not be sufficient to detect overloading the boom.


Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5, the hydraulic circuit and electronic control system of the example embodiment are described in greater detail. In the depicted embodiment the hydraulic circuit includes at least one relief valve 38 in fluid communication with the hydraulic cylinder. The relief valve 38 allows hydraulic fluid to flow out of the hydraulic cylinder 22 when the cylinder is actuated and the pressure in the cylinder exceeds a certain pressure. However, when the hydraulic cylinder is locked out, the hydraulic cylinder 22 is isolated (cut off from) the relief valve. As discussed above, lock out is used in the depicted embodiment so that the position of the boom 16 remains constant during a trenching operation to maintain constant trench depth. If the hydraulic cylinder 22 was not locked out, the boom 16 would in some applications move up gradually as fluid would escape periodically through the relief valve. In the depicted embodiment a pressure transducer is located in fluid communication with the lock out portion of the hydraulic circuit.


In the depicted embodiment, the pressure in the lock out portion is measured, and the pressure data is sent to a control processor 30 that determines whether the pressure is high enough to warrant slowing the ground speed of the trencher 10 and, if so, by how much should the ground speed be slowed. For example, if the measured pressure is within a predetermined range, the ground speed may be slowed proportional to the magnitude of the pressure, and if the measured pressure is high enough, the trencher may be stopped.


Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5, an example system for controlling the ground speed of a machine based in part on the measured force applied to the attachment is shown. In the depicted embodiment a pump 36 drives hydraulic fluid from a tank 35 past a relief valve 38 through a three position valve 42 and through either of check valves A or B to the hydraulic cylinder 22. The pressure of the hydraulic cylinder 22 is measured by a pressure transducer 32, and data that is representative of the measured pressure is sent to a computer network 30 that includes a processor. The processor determines whether and how to adjust configuration of the ground drive pump 44 to increase or decrease the speed of a ground drive motor 46, which in turn dictates the ground drive speed of the machine.


In the depicted embodiment the transducer 32 measures the hydraulic pressure in a portion of the hydraulic circuit that can be locked out from the rest of the hydraulic circuit. The portion that can be locked out is referred to herein as the locked out portion. In the depicted configuration the locked out portion includes the hydraulic cylinder 22 and the hydraulic lines that extend from the hydraulic cylinder to check valve A and check valve B. The pressure in the locked out portion can be different than the pressure in other components connected to the pump 36 or tank 35. In the depicted embodiment the locked out portion of the hydraulic circuit is selectively in fluid communication with a relief valve 38. However, if the pressure in the depicted portions of the hydraulic circuit outside of the locked out portion exceeds a predetermined value (e.g., 2500 psi), the relief valve allows hydraulic fluid to escape from the circuit to prevent overload.


In the depicted orientation the locked out portion is shown locked out (isolated from the rest of the circuit including the relief valve 38) thereby preventing the cylinder 22 from extending or retracting. In the depicted configuration and orientation of the valve 42, flow from the pump 36 bypasses the cylinder 22 via the power beyond path 40. When the valve 42 is moved schematically to the left, hydraulic fluid flows through check valve A and the cylinder 22 extends. When the valve 42 is moved schematically to the right, the hydraulic fluid flows through check valve B and the cylinder 22 is retracted. In the depicted embodiment, when the valve 42 is moved either to the left or right, the locked out portion is in fluid communication (not isolated) from the rest of the hydraulic circuit including the relief valve 38.


As discussed above, the data that is representative of the pressure of the hydraulic cylinder 22 measured by the transducer 32, which is representative of the load on the boom 16, is sent to the computer network 30 to be processed. In one embodiment of the present disclosure averages of the data received on a ⅓ second sliding average (the data measured in any ⅓ of second in time is averaged) is calculated. The calculated average pressure is compared to a lower and upper pressure limit (e.g., 1800 psi lower limit and 2300 psi upper limit).


If the calculated average pressure is lower than the lower pressure limit, the controller multiplies the value by 1, thereby doing nothing to change the ground speed (via the ground drive pump 44 or ground drive motor 46). When the calculated average pressure is between the lower and upper limits, the control signal output to the pump 44 is multiplied by a number between one and zero, proportional to the distance between the two limits, with zero being the multiplier at the upper limit. If the calculated average pressure exceeds the upper limit, the control signal output to the pump 44 is multiplied by zero which signals the machine to stop. Accordingly, the flow rate from the pump 44 to the ground drive motor 46, which dictates the speed of the tracks 14, changes depending on the data measured from the transducer 32.


It should be appreciated that the above description is simply one of many examples of embodiments of the present disclosure. For example, the present disclosure is not limited to trenchers. The present disclosure relates to any machines having tool attachments that could fail if overloaded, for example, it relates to any machine having tool attachments with a boom that extends from the machine wherein the tool attachment could fail if the machine applies too much load to the boom.


Also, it should be appreciated that there are many alternative ways to apply the principles of the present disclosure to trenchers. For example, in alternative embodiments of the present disclosure the orientation of the attachment relative to the machine can be controlled by hydraulic cylinders that are part of the machine itself or directly connected to the machine and the attachment, rather than part of the attachment as shown. In addition, the attachment can be different. For example, the attachment could be a rock wheel rather than a digger with a chain. In other alternative embodiments the load on the attachment can be measured using a strain gauge that is attached to a member that supports the attachment relative to the machine. For example, the load on a vibratory plow attachment may be measured via a strain gauge, and the speed of the tractor attached thereto can be adjusted accordingly. Many other variations in accordance with the present disclosure are also possible.


The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.

Claims
  • 1. A machine comprising: a chassis;a ground drive propulsion system connected to the chassis;a trencher attachment connected to the chassis, the trencher attachment including a boom that supports a material reduction tool;a control linkage and a lift control valve configured to adjust the orientation of the boom relative to the chassis and hold it in a fixed position relative to the chassis, the control linkage including a hydraulic cylinder in fluid communication with the lift control valve, the lift control valve being movable to a lock-out position wherein fluid is substantially prevented from flowing into and out of the hydraulic cylinder thereby holding the boom in the fixed position relative to the chassis;a boom load measuring system configured to measure the load on the boom when the lift control valve is in the lock-out position, wherein the boom load measuring system is independent of the pressure of the hydraulic fluid that drives the material reduction tool; anda drive control unit that receives information from the boom load measuring device and is configured to automatically slow the ground speed of the trencher based at least in part on the load on the boom.
  • 2. The machine of claim 1, wherein the boom load measuring system is independent of the pressure of the hydraulic fluid that drive the propulsion system.
  • 3. The machine of claim 1, wherein the boom load measuring system is independent of an engine speed of the machine.
  • 4. The machine of claim 1, wherein the boom load measuring device includes a strain gauge.
  • 5. The machine of claim 1, wherein the boom load measuring device includes a transducer located within the hydraulic cylinder.
  • 6. The machine of claim 1, wherein the hydraulic cylinder is arranged such that the flow of hydraulic fluid into and out of the cylinder is limited to less than five drops per minute when the lift control valve is in the lock-out position.
  • 7. The machine of claim 1, further comprising at least two pairs of drive tracks connected to the chassis, wherein the drive tracks are driven by hydraulic fluid.
  • 8. The machine of claim 1, wherein the material reduction tool is a chain.
  • 9. The machine of claim 1, wherein the material reduction tool is a rock wheel.
  • 10. A machine attachment comprising: a boom configured to support a material reduction device that is driven by hydraulic fluid;a hydraulic cylinder arranged to adjust the orientation of the boom, wherein the hydraulic cylinder is arranged such that the flow of hydraulic fluid into and out of the cylinder can be substantially prevented by a lift control valve in fluid communication with the hydraulic cylinder such that fluid flowing through the hydraulic cylinder is limited to less than five drops per minute when the lift control valve is in a lock-out position to hold the boom in a substantially fixed position relative to a machine to which the attachment is attached;a boom load measuring system configured to measure the load on the boom, wherein the boom load measuring system is independent of the pressure of the hydraulic fluid that drives the material reduction device; anda drive control output signal configured to slow a ground speed of a machine connected to the machine attachment, wherein the drive control output signal is based at least in part on the load on the boom.
  • 11. The machine attachment of claim 10, wherein the boom load measuring system is independent of pressure of the hydraulic fluid that drives a propulsion system of the machine connected to the attachment.
  • 12. The machine attachment of claim 10, wherein the boom load measuring system is independent of a speed of an engine of the machine connected to the attachment.
  • 13. The machine attachment of claim 10, wherein the boom load measuring device includes a strain gauge.
  • 14. The machine attachment of claim 10, wherein the boom is configured to support a chain.
  • 15. The machine attachment of claim 10, wherein the boom load measuring device includes a transducer located in hydraulic fluid that is at the same pressure as fluid in the hydraulic cylinder.
  • 16. The machine attachment of claim 15, wherein the transducer is operably connected to a drive control unit.
  • 17. A machine comprising: a chassis;a ground drive propulsion system comprising a first hydraulic system;a trencher attachment connected to the chassis such that the attachment can be raised and lowered relative to the chassis;a trencher control linkage for setting the trencher attachment at a fixed position comprising a second hydraulic system with an actuator, a lift control valve, the lift control valve being movable to a lock-out position wherein fluid is substantially prevented from flowing into and out of the actuator thereby holding the trencher attachment in the fixed position relative to the chassis;a third hydraulic system for driving a material reduction tool wherein the pressure in the third hydraulic system is independent of the pressure in the second hydraulic system;a boom load measuring system configured to measure the load on the control linkage, wherein the boom load measuring system is independent of a hydraulic pressure of the first, second, and third hydraulic systems; anda control unit that receives the measured load from the boom load measuring system and is configured to adjust the propulsion system.
  • 18. The machine of claim 17, wherein the drive control unit is configured to slow the ground speed of the trencher when the measured load on the boom is above a set lower limit value.
  • 19. The machine of claim 18, wherein the drive control unit is configured to stop the ground drive propulsion system of the trencher when the measured load on the boom is above a set upper limit value.
  • 20. The machine of claim 19, wherein when the measured load on the boom is between the set lower limit and the set upper limit, the drive control unit is configured to slow the ground drive speed until the measured load on the boom is below the set lower limit.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/423,437 filed Apr. 14, 2009 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/168,146 filed Apr. 9, 2009, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (96)
Number Name Date Kind
2804751 Schroeder Sep 1957 A
3605903 Glesmann Sep 1971 A
3726191 Johnston et al. Apr 1973 A
3750762 Eaton Aug 1973 A
3876020 Barsby Apr 1975 A
3892286 Clevenger et al. Jul 1975 A
4013875 McGlynn Mar 1977 A
4076090 Krusche et al. Feb 1978 A
4111066 Kendrick Sep 1978 A
4173836 Paurat Nov 1979 A
4175628 Cornell et al. Nov 1979 A
4255883 Ealy Mar 1981 A
4277898 Flippin Jul 1981 A
4301910 Price Nov 1981 A
4423785 Kurihara et al. Jan 1984 A
4455770 Presley Jun 1984 A
4541497 Riediger et al. Sep 1985 A
4611527 Breeden Sep 1986 A
4662684 Marten May 1987 A
4677579 Radomilovich Jun 1987 A
4699239 Ishino et al. Oct 1987 A
4702358 Mueller et al. Oct 1987 A
4715012 Mueller, Jr. Dec 1987 A
4727353 Ruhter Feb 1988 A
4896442 Stiff et al. Jan 1990 A
4945221 Nielsen et al. Jul 1990 A
5065320 Hayashi et al. Nov 1991 A
5065326 Sahm Nov 1991 A
5088020 Nishida et al. Feb 1992 A
5101919 Ossi Apr 1992 A
5182713 Kitoh Jan 1993 A
5212998 Testerman May 1993 A
5293944 Matsumoto Mar 1994 A
5297019 Zuehlke Mar 1994 A
5297649 Yamamoto et al. Mar 1994 A
RE34576 Camilleri Apr 1994 E
5325933 Matsushita Jul 1994 A
5347448 Nam Sep 1994 A
5361211 Lee et al. Nov 1994 A
5363304 Awano et al. Nov 1994 A
5398766 Nakayama et al. Mar 1995 A
5424623 Allen et al. Jun 1995 A
5456333 Brandt et al. Oct 1995 A
5477678 Shirai et al. Dec 1995 A
5509220 Cooper Apr 1996 A
5544055 Cooper Aug 1996 A
5574642 Cooper Nov 1996 A
5576962 Ferguson et al. Nov 1996 A
5590041 Cooper Dec 1996 A
5681242 Bates Oct 1997 A
5737993 Cobo et al. Apr 1998 A
5768811 Cooper Jun 1998 A
5893677 Haehn et al. Apr 1999 A
5918527 Haga et al. Jul 1999 A
5931078 Kropp Aug 1999 A
5975214 Okamura et al. Nov 1999 A
6022292 Goodnight Feb 2000 A
6317669 Kurenuma et al. Nov 2001 B1
6351900 DeWind Mar 2002 B1
6371566 Haehn Apr 2002 B1
6427107 Chiu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6728619 Adachi et al. Apr 2004 B2
6729050 Whitten et al. May 2004 B2
6766236 Lamela et al. Jul 2004 B1
6804903 Cooper Oct 2004 B1
6823672 Nakamura Nov 2004 B2
6851495 Sprinkle et al. Feb 2005 B2
6901324 Rose et al. May 2005 B2
6948265 Unzicker et al. Sep 2005 B2
7069722 Lonn Jul 2006 B2
7077345 Byram et al. Jul 2006 B2
7260931 Egelja et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273125 Schuh Sep 2007 B2
7287620 Thomas et al. Oct 2007 B2
7539570 Normann May 2009 B2
7630793 Thomas et al. Dec 2009 B2
7695071 Jackson et al. Apr 2010 B2
7762013 Hartwick Jul 2010 B2
7778756 Hartwick et al. Aug 2010 B2
7797934 Bacon et al. Sep 2010 B2
7930843 Hartwick Apr 2011 B2
8042290 Hartwick Oct 2011 B2
8347529 Berg et al. Jan 2013 B2
20020139013 Hammerle Oct 2002 A1
20040098984 Duell et al. May 2004 A1
20040211092 Barnes Oct 2004 A1
20050004734 Cripps Jan 2005 A1
20050177291 Strashny et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050278100 Porter Dec 2005 A1
20060011400 Thomas et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060235595 Sawada Oct 2006 A1
20070240928 Coltson et al. Oct 2007 A1
20090000154 Hartwick Jan 2009 A1
20090000156 Hartwick et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090000157 Hartwick Jan 2009 A1
20090178816 Piekutowski et al. Jul 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
27 00 950 Mar 1978 DE
28 00 631 Dec 1978 DE
0 803 614 Oct 1997 EP
0 905 325 Mar 1999 EP
1 260 716 Nov 2002 EP
1 914 354 Apr 2008 EP
1596736 Jul 1970 FR
2222498 Oct 1974 FR
3-70683 Mar 1991 JP
WO 9102853 Mar 1991 WO
WO 9402346 Feb 1994 WO
WO 03068660 Aug 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (18)
Entry
DC2 Microcontroller, Sauer Sundstrand, 3 pages (Mar. 1993).
DP600 Series Graphical Terminals, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006).
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 17, 2009 relating to PCT Application PCT/US2008/068346.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 5, 2008 relating to PCT/US2008/068355.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 7, 2008 relating to PCT Application PCT/US2008/068335.
Introducing Tesmec's all-new Mechanical Series, Tesmec, 2 pages pages (Publicly known at least as early as Jun. 29, 2007).
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees with Partial International Search mailed Nov. 4, 2008 relating to PCT Application PCT/US2008/068346.
IX024-010-00000 Plus+1 Input Module, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006).
MC050-010-00000 Plus+1 Controller, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006).
MC050-020-00000 Plus+1 Controller, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006).
MCE101C Load Controller, Sauer Sundstrand, 3 pages (Feb. 1990).
Office Action mailed Jul. 21, 2009 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/770,909.
Office Action mailed Jun. 23, 2010 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/770,940.
OX024-010-00000 Plus+1 Output Module, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006).
Plus+1 Guide Starter Kit and Development System, Sauer Danfoss, 2 pages (Jan. 2006).
Plus+1 Guide User Manual, Sauer Danfoss, pp. 1-450 (Apr. 2007).
European Search Report mailed Dec. 7, 2010 relating to European Application 10186517.8.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees with Partial International Search mailed Jul. 10, 2009 relating to PCT Application PCT/US2009/040503.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130091743 A1 Apr 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61168146 Apr 2009 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12423437 Apr 2009 US
Child 13709886 US