1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to automated machine control, which can be configured for work order management involving multiple agricultural vehicles and crop fields, and in particular to a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) based agricultural spray boom height control system and method.
2. Description of the Related Art
Mobile equipment and machinery, including vehicles, agricultural equipment, open-pit mining machines and crop duster aircraft, are commonly guided and operationally controlled using global navigation satellite system (GNSS) components. Currently-available satellite positioning systems (SATPS) provide parallel and contour swathing for precision farming. For example, equipment can be guided or automatically steered along adjacent parallel path swaths, which can be offset from each other by approximately the vehicle width in a parallel path mode of operation.
Various GNSS-based navigation systems have been installed in ground-based vehicles. Systems using Doppler radar guidance systems can encounter positioning errors with the radar and latency. Similarly, gyroscopes and accelerometers (collectively inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide heading, roll and pitch measurements (e.g., XYZ headings). However, IMUs tend to encounter drift and bias errors requiring external attitude measurements for gyroscope initialization and drift compensation. Gyroscopes have good short-term characteristics but undesirable long-term characteristics, especially lower-cost gyroscopes, such as those based on vibrating resonators.
Similarly, inertial systems employing gyroscopes and accelerometers have good short-term characteristics but also suffer from drift. Existing GNSS position computations may include lag times, which may be especially troublesome when, for example, GNSS velocity is used to derive vehicle heading. Many existing GNSS systems do not provide highly accurate heading information at slower vehicle speeds. Therefore, what is needed is a low cost sensor system to facilitate vehicle swath navigation that makes use of the desirable behaviors of both GNSS and inertial units while eliminating or reducing non-desirable behavior. Specifically, what is needed is a means to employ low-cost gyroscopes (e.g., micro electromechanical (MEM) gyroscopes) which tend to provide good short-term, low-noise, high-accuracy positioning while minimizing inherent long-term drift.
Providing multiple antennas on a vehicle can provide additional benefits by determining an attitude of the vehicle from the GNSS ranging signals received by its antennas, which are constrained on the vehicle at a predetermined spacing. For example, high dynamic roll compensation signals can be output directly to the vehicle steering using GNSS-derived attitude information. Components such as gyroscopes and accelerometers can be eliminated using such techniques. Real-time kinematic (RTK) navigation can be accomplished using relatively economical single frequency L1—only receivers with inputs from at least two antennas mounted in fixed relation on a rover vehicle. Still further, moving baselines can be provided for positioning solutions involving tractors and implements and multi-vehicle GNSS control can be provided.
Providing additional antennas in combination with standard SATPS and GNSS guidance, as mentioned above, along with optional gyroscopes, can provide an effective method to increase GNSS positioning precision and accuracy. However, accuracy and precision can only improve the efficiency of working vehicles, such as those in the agricultural field, to a limited extent. Although such systems are able to track and guide vehicles in three dimensions, including along ridges and sloped-regions, errors may appear in other aspects of a working vehicle. For example, in an agricultural field-working situation where a tractor is towing an implement, the implement may slide on a sloped-region, or the tractor may list to one side or another when entering softer soil or rocky areas. This can happen repeatedly when a vehicle is guided around the same field, regardless of the precision of the guidance system in pre-planning a path. Thus, a system that can detect such changes in uniformity of a field as the vehicle traverses a path, and can remember those changes, can predict and re-route a more accurate and more economical path than a guidance system alone.
Conventional agricultural spraying operations are carried out over an entire field, everywhere the crop is planted. In contrast, environmental spraying allows the spraying of certain materials which require restrictions in the area of deposition due to potential toxicity or strength. The restrictions can include the distance from waterways and slope of the ground which can affect run-off and concentrations of deposits. In spray equipment with booms, maintaining uniform boom height over field surfaces during product application is important for uniform application rates and optimum product drift management relative to the targets, e.g., field crops. These systems are limited in performance due to their ability to look ahead and react with a spray vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed. In addition, these methods encounter issues when there are rapid changes in terrain or skips in crop canopy. The present invention addresses both issues.
GNSS-based precision application of agricultural inputs, such as pesticides, fertilizers and seeds, are commonly performed with large fleets of vehicles dispatched from common or networked home-base locations. Communication of mission planning information to all working vehicles, in real time, is paramount to efficiency. One piece of such information, which is a key to the present invention, is the terrain model, which can be created with specialized software using previously-logged field data containing highly precise positioning information from real-time kinematic (RTK) GNSS receivers. The logged data can be uploaded to the processing center from the logging vehicle through any data connection, although a wireless/remote connection is most desired for efficiency. Once processed, the terrain models can be dispatched from the home-base or processing center location to any vehicle via wireless data connection. The data is thus available to operators preparing to work fields using the boom height control system of the present invention. Using wireless data connectivity, the Internet (i.e., via the “Cloud”) enables efficient use of a boom height invention via the seamless transfer of the terrain model, which is a key component of the system.
Work order management functions for coordinating multiple machines at multiple remote locations can be accommodated with the present invention.
Previous spray boom height control systems include sonic sensors for measuring spray boom heights over ground surfaces and crop canopies.
Heretofore there has not been available a system and method with the advantages and features of the present invention.
In the practice of the present invention, position sensors (such as GNSS and IMU) are used to accurately locate the implement (such as a spray boom) with reference to the ground, standing crop, or other field features. Real time compute engine processes control algorithms to compare sensor data with spatial data logged from a previous operation, or terrain model, to make control decisions which maintain desired implement height. Work order management systems and methods can be combined with the machine control functions of the present invention to further automate operations, including agricultural operations involving multiple machines operating at multiple locations and sharing data with each other and with centralized data facilities.
The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the present invention illustrating various objects and features thereof.
As required, detailed aspects of the present invention are disclosed herein, however, it is to be understood that the disclosed aspects are merely exemplary of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art how to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.
Certain terminology will be used in the following description for convenience in reference only and will not be limiting. For example, up, down, front, back, right and left refer to the invention as orientated in the view being referred to. The words, “inwardly” and “outwardly” refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the aspect being described and designated parts thereof. Forwardly and rearwardly are generally in reference to the direction of travel, if appropriate. Said terminology will include the words specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof and words of similar meaning.
The guidance system is connected to a job set up and graphical user interface (GUI) component 10, which can include suitable display monitor components. A field template file 12 is provided for specific fields and includes such information as GNSS-defined field coordinates, material prescription information, environmental conditions and equipment routing directions. Geodesic (e.g., geographic) information system (GIS) and cloud (e.g., Internet) 14 data sources and connectivity are provided for communicating bi-directionally with the other components of the system 2.
Boom inertial measurement units 16 are connected to the control compute engine 6, and can include such devices as accelerometers and gyroscopes for measuring inertia and positioning information in three axes (X, Y, Z). The boom 20 can include a GNSS receiver with an antenna 18, or can be directly controlled via the implement motive component, such as a tractor. The boom 20 includes sections 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, each equipped with its own inertial measurement unit (IMU) 16. The boom sections can be articulated for conforming to field conditions.
The system 2 can utilize a terrain model of the field, including field boundaries, topography, soil conditions, crop data and other pertinent information. Moreover, the terrain models can be generated in real-time as the equipment traverses the field, transmitted from the mobile equipment to a centralized server or base, and re-transmitted to the equipment for use in current field operations, which can be done based on work orders. Multiple mobile equipment pieces engaged in multiple different field locations can be controlled and coordinated.
Without limitation, the system 2 can be used for practicing a method of the present invention for controlling the height of an agricultural spray boom using the following steps:
The system 2 can also be used in conjunction with a work order management system for controlling multiple pieces of equipment (e.g., without limitation, agricultural vehicles equipped with spray booms 20). Work order status including location, equipment status and field conditions can be transmitted via the cloud 14 to a central location equipped with a computer for coordinating the operation of a fleet of agricultural vehicles. A variety of user interface devices, including vehicle-mounted computers, smart phones, hand-held devices, etc. can be utilized. Data can be transmitted to and from the vehicles in real-time. Alternatively, data can be stored for later retrieval and processing (e.g., on removable storage media such as USB thumb drives, CDs, DVDs, etc.). These can be periodically downloaded and data thereon transferred to a central control computer or system.
Such data can include, without limitation, field terrain models as described above. Other data can comprise, for example, work orders, crop data, agricultural input (e.g., fertilizers, herbicides, seeds, nutrients, etc.) and machine-specific performance and location information. The system is scalable for accommodating multiple fields and fleets of vehicles, which can be located in proximity to, or remote from, each other. By interconnecting the vehicles via the cloud, specific operations (e.g., spray boom heights, spray materials and field conditions), can be recorded for reporting, monitoring, evaluating, tracking and controlling operations.
It is to be understood that while certain embodiments and/or aspects of the invention have been shown and described, the invention is not limited thereto and encompasses various other embodiments and aspects.
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/214,215, filed Mar. 14, 2014, which claims priority in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/783,973, filed Mar. 14, 2013, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 6,539,303; U.S. Pat. No. 6,711,501; U.S. Pat. No. 8,214,111; U.S. Pat. No. 8,386,129; U.S. Pat. No. 8,548,649; U.S. Pat. No. 8,583,315; U.S. Pat. No. 8,583,326; and U.S. Pat. No. 8,594,879 are also incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5050771 | Hanson | Sep 1991 | A |
5194851 | Kraning et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5348226 | Heiniger | Sep 1994 | A |
5390125 | Sennott et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5663879 | Trovato et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5684476 | Anderson | Nov 1997 | A |
5923270 | Sampo et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6052647 | Parkinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070673 | Wendte | Jun 2000 | A |
6073070 | Diekhans | Jun 2000 | A |
6212453 | Kawagoe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6377889 | Soest | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6445983 | Dickson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6539303 | McClure | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6711501 | McClure | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6789014 | Rekow et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804587 | O'Connor | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819780 | Benson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6865465 | McClure | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876920 | Mailer | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7142956 | Heiniger et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7277792 | Overschie | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7437230 | McClure | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7460942 | Mailer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7623952 | Unruh | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650252 | McClure | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7689354 | Heiniger | Mar 2010 | B2 |
RE41358 | Heiniger | May 2010 | E |
7860628 | Lange | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8140223 | Whitehead | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8190337 | McClure | May 2012 | B2 |
8214111 | Heiniger | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8265826 | Feller | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8386129 | Collins | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8437901 | Anderson | May 2013 | B2 |
8548649 | Guyette | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583315 | Whitehead | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583326 | Collins | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594879 | Roberge | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8634993 | McClure | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649930 | Reeve et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9002565 | Jones | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20020049538 | Knapton | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072850 | McClure et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040186644 | McClure et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060167600 | Nelson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080195268 | Sapilewski | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090099737 | Wendte | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121932 | Whitehead | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164067 | Whitehead | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090251366 | McClure | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090312974 | Douglas | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100312428 | Roberge | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015817 | Reeve | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018765 | Whitehead | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054729 | Whitehead | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110224873 | Reeve | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231061 | Reeve | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110266365 | Hrnicek | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120087771 | Wenzel | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130593 | Davis | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169495 | Kowalchuk | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173093 | Kowalchuk | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120174445 | Jones | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215410 | McClure | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120301220 | Snoeck et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130008360 | Follmer | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130179026 | McClure et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130311050 | Cash | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130345937 | Strelioff | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140074360 | Rosa et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140093397 | Engelbrecht | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140168009 | Peake | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140277676 | Gattis | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002244539 | Oct 2002 | AU |
2002325645 | Mar 2003 | AU |
2008080193 | Jul 2008 | AU |
2010005945 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2012146255 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/020799 dated Jun. 25, 2015. |
Noh, Kwang-Mo, Self-tuning controller for farm tractor guidance, Iowa State University Retrospective Theses and Dissertations, Paper 9874, (1990). |
Van Zuydam,. R.P., Centimeter-Precision Guidance of Agricultural Implements in the Open Field by Means of Real Tim Kinematic DGPS, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, pp. 1023-1034 (1999). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160205864 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61783973 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14214215 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15083747 | US |