Machine suspension system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11267443
  • Patent Number
    11,267,443
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 8, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 8, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A machine includes a prime mover having a power take-off, a chassis configured to support at least an operator and the prime mover, a subframe pivotally coupled to the chassis about a pivot axis at a first location, at least one drive device configured to drive wheels of the machine, a drive belt and pulley arrangement. The subframe is further coupled to the chassis via at least one suspension device at a second location. The at least one drive device is driven by the prime mover and is coupled to the subframe. The pulley arrangement is configured to direct the drive belt from the power take-off of the prime mover to at least one drive pulley on the at least one drive device. The pulley arrangement comprises an idler pulley having a diameter and a rotational axis. The idler pulley is coupled to the chassis such that the rotational axis is spaced from the pivot axis by no greater than 1.5 times the diameter.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to a suspension system used on machines such as lawn and garden equipment, such as zero-turn radius (ZTR) mowers. Typically, ZTR mowers comprise unsuspended right and left drive wheels operably coupled to a mower frame, with at least one front caster wheel also coupled to the mower frame. However, independently-suspended right and left drive wheels for ZTR mowers have been shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,946,893, 6,062,333, 6,170,242, 6,244,025, 6,460,318, 6,510,678, 6,857,254, and 7,107,746, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. These patents show several variations of independently-suspended right and left drive wheels for ZTR mowers, each embodiment including a prime mover such as an internal combustion engine, a hydraulic pump for each respective drive wheel being operably coupled to the internal combustion engine, and a hydraulic motor for each respective drive wheel being operably coupled to the respective hydraulic pumps. Both the internal combustion engine and the respective hydraulic pumps are connected to the frame of the ZTR mower in an unsuspended manner, wherein the hydraulic pumps are mechanically coupled and driven by the internal combustion engine via, for example, a belt-and-pulley system. The hydraulic pumps are then coupled to the respective hydraulic wheel motors via a series of hoses, wherein the hydraulic wheel motors are mounted on a suspension platform to allow for independent suspension of each of the drive wheels. The delivery of hydraulic fluid from the hydraulic pumps to the hydraulic wheel motors enables zero-turn radius drive capabilities, as is known in the art.


Recently, the use of hydrostatic transmissions known as hydrostatic transaxles has become prevalent in the ZTR mower industry. Hydrostatic transaxles combine the hydraulic pump and hydraulic wheel motor into a single unit, thereby simplifying and reducing the overall cost of the drive system of ZTR mowers and other hydraulically-driven devices. Typically, two hydrostatic transaxles are used, one for each drive wheel of the ZTR mower. Similar to the system described above, the hydraulic pump of the hydraulic transaxle is mechanically driven by an internal combustion engine (or similar drive unit) via a belt-and-pulley system, and the hydraulic pump in turn drives the hydraulic motor for each drive wheel. However, due to the integration of the hydraulic pump and hydraulic wheel motor into a single unit, suspension of the drive wheels on a ZTR mower utilizing hydrostatic transaxles presents several challenges. Foremost of those challenges is the variation in belt angle between the drive pulley coupled to the output shaft of the internal combustion engine and the driven pulley(s) of the hydraulic pump on the hydrostatic transaxle. If the belt angle between the drive and driven pulley(s) is too great, the belt may run off of one or more the pulleys and render the drive system inoperable. These challenges were addressed in the ZTR mower suspension system shown in commonly-owned U.S. Pub. 2013/0291508, incorporated herein by reference. However, the system shown in that publication was directed to a larger, commercial-style ZTR mower, wherein the engine (and thus power take-off) positioning was significantly behind the hydrostatic transaxles, thereby enabling the system's pulleys to be located on a suspended subframe without significant variations in belt angle that would potentially cause the belt to “jump” or run off of one or more pulleys. The component-placement advantages of this larger machine would not necessarily be present in a smaller ZTR mower.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an isometric view of an example machine having an example suspension system.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of select machine and suspension components.



FIG. 3 is a top view of select machine and suspension components.



FIG. 4 is a top perspective view of a portion of the example machine and suspension of FIG. 1.



FIG. 5 is a rear perspective view of a portion of the example machine and suspension of FIG. 1



FIG. 6 is a sectional view of a portion of an example machine and suspension of FIG. 1.



FIG. 7 is a bottom view of a portion of the example machine and suspension of FIG. 1 illustrating various alternative idler pulley positions.



FIG. 8 is a top front perspective view illustrating an example parking brake system of the example machine of 1.



FIG. 9 is a top rear perspective view illustrating the example parking brake system.



FIG. 10 is a bottom perspective view illustrating the example parking brake system.



FIG. 11 is a fragmentary perspective view of a portion of the parking brake system in a brake disengaged position.



FIG. 12 is a fragmentary perspective view of the portion of the parking brake system in a brake engaged position.



FIG. 13 is a sectional view of the example machine illustrating parking brake system components.



FIG. 14 is a perspective view of another example hydrostatic transaxle and associated portions of another example parking brake system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLES


FIG. 1 illustrates of an example machine, an example piece of lawn and garden equipment, shown as a zero turn radius (ZTR) lawnmower 100. ZTR mower 100 of FIG. 1 comprises a prime mover 102, such as an air-cooled internal combustion engine, electric motor, etc., wherein prime mover 102 is supported on a chassis 104. An operator seat 106 is coupled to chassis 104 forward of prime mover 102, enabling an operator to control ZTR lawnmower 100 while seated in seat 106 and having their feet placed on footplate 108. Two control levers 110a, 110b are configured to be pivotally actuated by the operator to enable forward movement, reverse movement, and turning of ZTR lawnmower 100, as is well known in the art.


Control levers 110a, 110b are coupled to respective hydrostatic transaxles (not shown) to power respective right and left drive wheels 112. In lieu of hydrostatic transaxles, drive via independent pump and wheel motors or independent electric drive motors is also possible. Additionally, it is possible for a single transmission (hydraulic or otherwise) to drive both right and left drive wheels 112. Two front caster wheels 114a, 114b allow the mower to be easily maneuvered in a zero turn radius fashion. In the example illustrated in which the illustrated machine comprises a lawnmower, a mower deck 113 is hung from chassis 104, wherein the mower deck supports one or more mowing blades 115 powered by prime mover 102.



FIGS. 2-3 are partial views of various components of ZTR mower 100. As shown by FIGS. 2 and 3, chassis 104 comprises two longitudinal support beams 116a, 116b, a front cross beam 118a, and a central plate 121 coupled to respective longitudinal support beams 116a, 116b. Chassis 104 also comprises a prime mover mounting plate 120 upon which prime mover 102 is coupled. Additionally, a suspended subframe 105 is pivotally mounted to chassis 104 about a pivot axis A at respective pivot points 124a, 124b. Suspended platform 105 supports thereon integrated hydrostatic transaxles 130a, 130b, which integrally contain both a hydraulic pump and a hydraulic motor therein for driving drive wheels 112. Control cables 132a, 132b for each control lever 110a, 110b are coupled to bell cranks 134a, 134b on respective hydrostatic transaxles 130a, 130b, which enables forward and reverse control of transaxles 130a, 130b in a manner known in the art. While cables 132a, 132b are shown, it is also possible for the connection between control levers 110a, 110b and hydrostatic transaxles 130a, 130b to be via other types of suitable linkages.


Suspended subframe 105 comprises longitudinal support beams 122a, 122b, wherein the distal ends of longitudinal support beams 122a, 122b are coupled to respective suspension devices 126a, 126b. Suspension devices 126a, 126b could be any suitable suspension mechanism such as a coil-over-shock device, a dampener, etc. Suspension devices 126a, 126b are also coupled to respective supports 128a, 128b mounted on longitudinal support beams 116a, 116b of chassis 104. With this configuration, subframe 105 is pivotally suspended from chassis 104 about pivot axis A such that drive wheels 112 are capable of substantially vertical translation as ZTR mower 100 moves over rough terrain, etc. FIG. 2 shows subframe 105 in a substantially compressed position, but it is to be understood that subframe 105 may typically be at angled at various positions with respect chassis 104 originating at pivot points 124a, 124b, generally dependent upon the presence of an operator, condition of the terrain, etc. As hydrostatic transaxles 130a, 130b are coupled to subframe 105, they too are capable of vertical translation about pivot axis A. Conversely, because prime mover 102 is affixed to mounting plate 120 on chassis 104, prime mover 102 does not move in concert with suspended subframe 105.



FIG. 3 is a top view of various example ZTR mower components. As discussed above with respect to FIG. 2, suspended subframe 105 pivots about a pivot axis A from chassis 104. Respective longitudinal support beams 122a, 122b of subframe 105 act to at least partially support hydrostatic transaxles 130a, 130b (collectively referred to as transaxles 130), which are coupled to drive wheels through respective wheel hubs 131a, 131b. In order to transfer power from a prime mover (not shown) to the respective hydrostatic transaxles 130a, 130b, an engine drive pulley 135 is coupled to a power take-off (PTO) shaft of the prime mover and connected via a belt 137 using a pulley arrangement to be discussed in further detail below. A PTO clutch 136 is also coupled to the PTO shaft of the prime mover to drive the blades 108 of a mower deck 104 coupled to chassis 104 via a separate belt (also not shown). Belt 137 could be any suitable drive belt, but is preferably a double-A or double-V-type belt to allow the belt to drive pulleys on both its inside and outside surfaces.



FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate an example pulley arrangement 141 that guides and directs belt 137 so as to drive each of hydrostatic transaxles 130. Pulley arrangement comprises idler pulleys 138, 140, 142 and drive pulleys 144a, 144b. Belt 137 runs from PTO clutch 136 to idler pulleys 138, 140, wherein idler pulleys 138, 140 are mounted on central plate 121 of chassis 104. Accordingly, idler pulleys 138, 140 do not pivot about pivot axis A or otherwise move with vertical translation of suspended subframe 105. From idler pulleys 138, 140, belt 137 runs to drive pulleys 144a, 144b on respective hydrostatic transaxles 130a, 130b in order to enable hydraulic drive of the transaxles 130a, 130b. Idler pulley 142 is coupled to a rear cross beam 118b of subframe 105 to maintain tension and provide sufficient belt-wrap of belt 137 around drive pulleys 144a, 144b.


As mentioned above, idler pulleys 138, 140 are mounted on central plate 121 of chassis 104, while drive pulleys 144a, 144b are coupled to hydrostatic transaxles 130a, 130b, meaning drive pulleys 144a, 144b also move in concert with any translation of suspended subframe 105. As idler pulleys 138, 140 are stationary (i.e., do not pivot with respect to pivot axis A) and drive pulleys 144a, 144b move with suspended subframe 105, the angle of belt 137 between these sets of pulleys changes with the various the suspension conditions of subframe 105. Accordingly, proper placement of idler pulleys 138, 140 is important to avoid significant changes in belt angle during operation of the mower, as such significant changes may cause belt 137 to “jump” during operation and disengage belt 137 from the drive system.



FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate examples for the placement of idler pulleys 130, 140. As shown by FIG. 6, in one implementation, the rotational axes 150 of idler pulleys 138, 140 are perpendicular to and substantially in line with pivot axis A of suspended subframe 105. For the purposes of this embodiment, idler pulleys 138, 140 being “substantially” in line with the pivot axis A may mean that the pulleys are directly in line with pivot axis A (with no perceivable offset, intersecting pivot axis A), within one pulley diameter forward of pivot axis A, or a greater distance forward of pivot axis A within the confines of chassis 104.


In the example illustrated in FIG. 6, axes 150 of idler pulleys 138, 140 are directly in line with pivot axis A, intersecting pivot axis A. As a result, as indicated by radius lines 152, the belt angle between idler pulleys 138, 140 and drive pulleys 144a, 144b is as small as possible, regardless of the suspension condition of subframe 105. In other words, the length of belt 137 insubstantially changes or does not change in response to the pivoting of subframe 105. Because the length of belt 137 does not change despite the pivoting of subframe 105, the risk of belt 105 jumping and becoming disengaged from any of the pulleys of the pulley arrangement 141 is reduced.



FIG. 7 is a top view of portions of mower 100 illustrating alternative positions for idler pulleys 138, 140. In other implementations, the rotational axes 150 of idler pulleys 138, 140 may be spaced, forwardly or rearwardly, from pivot axis A by a distance D of up to 1.5 times the diameter of at least one of idler pulleys 138, 140. In such implementations, the length of belt may more substantially change as subframe 105 pivots, possibly requiring more robust and complex belt take up assemblies.


In some implementations, idler pulleys 138, 140 may alternatively be set slightly closer to the front of the mower (i.e., in the direction of control levers 110a, 110b. For example, in one implementation, idler pulleys 138, 140 may have rotational axes 150′ which are located less than or equal to 1 inch of pivot axis A as shown in FIG. 6. In other implementations, idler pulleys 138, 140 may be positioned a distance of one pulley diameter forward of pivot axis A without substantial changing the complexity of the system. As illustrating FIG. 7, in some implementations, idler pulleys 138, 140 may be positioned even further forward of pivot axis A (by greater than one pulley diameter) depending on the overall layout of the mower and intervening components, but this again may add to the complexity of the belt take-up assembly.



FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate one example belt take-up assembly 190 for taking up slack in belt 187 that may result from the pivoting of subframe 105 about pivot axis A. Belt take-up assembly 190 helps maintains belt tension on the system (i.e., “take-up”). In the example illustrated, belt take up assembly 190 comprises a movable support that movably supports the rotational axis of at least one of idler pulleys 138, 140 for movement between different positions to relocate the rotational axis and a bias mechanism resiliently biasing the idler pulley towards a predefined position for the rotational axis. In the example illustrated, the movable support comprises an idler arm 194 having a first end portion pivotally coupled to chassis 104 for pivotal movement about axis 195, a central portion rotatably supporting the idler pulley, idler pulley 140 for rotation about axis 150 and a second end portion resiliently biased towards a preset a predefined position. In the example illustrated, the bias mechanism comprises a tension spring 196 interconnecting the second end portion of arm 194 and chassis 104. During pivoting of subframe 105, spring 196 stretches or constricts as the rotational axis pulley 140 changes to accommodate the change in the length of segments or strands 197 of belt 187, extending between the idler pulleys 138, 140 and the drive pulleys 144a and 144b. In other implementations, belt take up assembly 190 may have other configurations.



FIGS. 8-13 illustrate an example parking brake system 200 for mower 100. Parking brake system 200 is configured to brake wheels 112 when the mower 100 is in a parked or stopped position. Parking brake system 200 comprises flexible cable 202, control arm interface 204, cable mount 206 and brake interface 208. Flexible cable 202 extends between control arm 110a (shown in FIGS. 1-3) and each of hydrostatic transaxles 130 so as to transmit motion of control arm 110a to an internally located braking mechanism within each of hydrostatic transaxles 130. In the example illustrated, flexible cable 202 comprises a Bowden cable, a cable comprising an inner flexible cable 210 and an outer guiding sheath 212 (shown in FIG. 12). The inner flexible cable 210 is connected to the control arm interface 204 and the brake interface 208 at opposite ends, wherein the inner flexible cable is pushed and pulled through, along and relative to the outer flexible sheath 212. The outer flexible sheath 212 has a first end 214 (as shown in FIG. 11) fixedly coupled to chassis 104 proximate to control arm interface 204 and a second end 216 fixedly coupled to cable mount 206 supported by subframe 105. The outer flexible sheath 212 has sufficient slack between its ends such that the outer flexible sheath may accommodate movement of cable mount 206 resulting from pivotal movement of suspension 105



FIG. 11 illustrates control arm interface 204 in more detail. Control arm interface 204 comprises rod 220 and bell crank bracket 222. Rod 220 is coupled between control arm 110a and bell crank bracket 222. In one implementation, rod 220 is affixed at one end to control arm 110a and a second end to bell crank bracket 222.


Bell crank bracket 222 comprises a bracket pivotably coupled to chassis 104 for rotation about axis 226. Bracket 222 is connected to rod 220 on a first side of axis 226 and is connected to flexible cable 210 on a second side of axis 226. As shown by FIG. 12, pivoting of control arm 110a outwards, about axis 230 drives rod 220 in the direction indicated by arrow 232 which results in bell crank bracket 222 being rotated in the direction indicated by arrow 234. Rotation of bell crank bracket 222 and the direction indicated by arrow 232 results in table 210 being pulled through and relative to sheath 212 in the direction indicated by arrow 236. Such motion is transmitted through an along sheath 212 to brake interface 208.


Cable mount 206 comprises a structure affixed to and carried by subframe 105 so as to pivot with subframe 105. Cable mount 206 secures end 216 of sheath 212 to subframe 105. Cable mount 206 ensures that the sheath about flexible cable 210 also moves with the pivoting of subframe 105, wherein the actual length of the flexible cable 210 within sheath 212 does not change.


Brake interface 208 comprises one or more structures interconnecting flexible cable 216. Brake interface 208 comprises spring 250, bracket 252, lever 254 and bias 256. Spring 250 comprises a tension spring connected between cable 210 and bracket 252. Spring 250 exerts a bias through flexible cable 210 to bell crank bracket 222, opposing outward pivoting of control arm 110a. Spring 250 further transmits motion of cable 210 to bracket 252.


Bracket 252 comprises a non-flexible frame or member that interconnects spring 250 and lever 254. Bracket 252 further interconnects spring 250 to a second lever 254 associated with the other hydrostatic transaxle 131b. In the example illustrated, bracket 252 comprises an inflexible or rigid U-shaped frame having opposing spaced legs extending on opposite sides of PTO clutch 136 and connected to each of the levers 254 of the two hydrostatic transaxles 131. In other implementations, bracket 252 may have other configurations.


Lever 254 comprises a rigid brake engaging member pivotally connected to bracket 252 at one end and connected to a shaft or rod that rotates about axis 260 and that extends into the respective transaxle 130a, 130b to an internal cog or other component (not shown) within transaxles 130a, 130b when in the “park” position to prevent rotation of the drive wheels. Spring 256 comprise a tension spring having one end connected to or affixed relative to an outer housing of the respective transaxle 130 and having another end connected to lever 254 to bias lever 254 to a predefined position, such as a position in which the internal brake of the transaxle 130 is disengaged. In other implementations, other mechanisms may be utilized to bias lever 254 to a predefined position.


Due to the suspended nature of subframe 105, it is important that U-shaped frame 150 remain stationary relative to transaxles 130a, 130b unless actuated by the user to apply the parking brake. Accordingly, while flexible cable 210 may move with corresponding pivotal movement of subframe 105, spring 152 and U-shaped frame 150 are mounted only to components of subframe 105 such that translation of the suspension system alone does not move levers 254 and inadvertently actuate the cogs or other components within transaxles 130a, 130b to actuate the brake while the mower is moving.



FIG. 14 illustrates hydrostatic transaxle 330, an alternative implementation of hydrostatic transaxle 130a or 130b. Transaxle 330 is similar to transaxle 130 except that transaxle 330 has an external braking mechanism comprising gear 370 and brake 372. Gear 370 is affixed to a shaft and operably coupled to the output shaft of transaxle 330 and wheel 112. Brake 372 comprises a curved toothed brake engagement member pivotable about axis 378 between a gear engaging, braking position and a withdrawn, brake disengaged position. In such an implementation, bracket 252 (shown in FIG. 13) is pivotally connected to brake 372 at connection 380. In one of limitation, bracket 252 is pivotally connected to brake 372 at connection 380 for each of the two transaxles 330. Similar to lever 254, brake 372 is resiliently biased towards a withdrawn position by spring 256.


In operation, in response to lever arm 110a being pivoted outward about axis 230 as shown in FIG. 12, flexible cable 210 is pulled to pull up on spring 250. Spring 250 pulls upon bracket 250 which pivots brake 372, against the bias of spring 256, into braking engagement with gear 370. Pivoting of control arm 110a to the inner position shown in FIG. 11 results in bracket 252 pivoting brake 372 about axis 378 away from and out of engagement with brake 370. Such withdrawal to the brake disengaged position is further assisted by the bias of spring 256.


Although the present disclosure has been described with reference to example implementations, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. For example, although the pulley arrangement and the parking brake system are illustrated as being utilized as part of a riding lawnmower such as a zero turn radius mower, in other implementations, we discussed pulley arrangement and parking brake system may be employed and other machines or other pieces of lawn and garden equipment which employ a suspension that carries drive devices that are driven by a prime mover. Although different example implementations may have been described as including one or more features providing one or more benefits, it is contemplated that the described features may be interchanged with one another or alternatively be combined with one another in the described example implementations or in other alternative implementations. Because the technology of the present disclosure is relatively complex, not all changes in the technology are foreseeable. The present disclosure described with reference to the example implementations and set forth in the following claims is manifestly intended to be as broad as possible. For example, unless specifically otherwise noted, the claims reciting a single particular element also encompass a plurality of such particular elements.

Claims
  • 1. A machine comprising: a prime moveran engine drive pulley coupled to the prime mover;a chassis, wherein the chassis is configured to support at least an operator and the prime mover;a subframe pivotally coupled to the chassis about a pivot axis, wherein the subframe is further coupled to the chassis via at least one suspension device;at least one drive device configured to drive wheels of the machine, the at least one drive device driven by the prime mover;a drive belt; anda pulley arrangement configured to direct the drive belt from the engine drive pulley of the prime mover to at least one drive pulley on the at least one drive device, wherein the pulley arrangement comprises at least one idler pulley having a diameter and a rotational axis.
  • 2. The machine of claim 1, wherein the machine comprises a lawn mower.
  • 3. The machine of claim 1, wherein the at least one idler pulley comprises a first idler pulley having a first diameter and a first rotational axis and a second idler pulley having a second diameter and a second rotational axis.
  • 4. The machine of claim 1, wherein the at least one drive device comprises at least one hydrostatic transaxle having at least one output shaft located along a transaxle axis and coupled to a drive wheel of the machine and wherein the at least one drive pulley is located rearward of the transaxle axis and the at least one idler pulley is positioned forward of the transaxle axis.
  • 5. The machine of claim 4, wherein the engine drive pulley is located rearward of the transaxle axis.
  • 6. The machine of claim 1, wherein the subframe comprises a first longitudinal support beam, a second longitudinal support beam, and a cross beam.
  • 7. The machine of claim 1, wherein the prime mover is at least one of an internal combustion engine and an electric motor.
  • 8. The machine of claim 1, wherein the prime mover is coupled to a plate on the chassis.
  • 9. The machine of claim 1, wherein the idler pulley is movable to reposition the rotational axis and wherein the machine further comprises a bias mechanism resiliently biasing the idler pulley towards a predefined position for the rotational axis.
  • 10. The machine of claim 9, wherein the bias mechanism comprises an idler arm rotationally supporting the idler pulley and tensioning spring coupling the idler arm to the chassis.
  • 11. The machine of claim 1, wherein the rotational axis of the idler pulley is offset from the pivot axis.
  • 12. A machine comprising: a prime mover, the prime mover having a power takeoff;a chassis, wherein the chassis is configured to support at least an operator and the prime mover;a subframe pivotally coupled to the chassis about a pivot axis, wherein the subframe is further coupled to the chassis via at least one suspension device;at least hydrostatic transaxle having at least one output shaft having a transaxle axis, the output shaft coupled to a drive wheel of the machine, the at least one hydrostatic transaxle driven by the prime mover and coupled to the subframe;a drive belt; anda pulley arrangement configured to direct the drive belt from the power take-off of the prime mover to at least one drive pulley on the at least one hydrostatic transaxle, wherein the pulley arrangement comprises at least one idler pulley having a diameter and a rotational axis, and wherein the at least one drive pulley is located rearward of the transaxle axis.
  • 13. The machine of claim 12 further comprising a mower deck coupled to the chassis and rotationally supporting a mower blade.
  • 14. The machine of claim 12, wherein the rotational axis of the idler pulley is spaced near the pivot axis.
  • 15. The machine of claim 12, further including an engine drive pulley coupled to the power takeoff and wherein the engine drive pulley is located rearward of the transaxle axis.
  • 16. The machine of claim 15, wherein pulley arrangement is configured to direct the drive belt from the engine drive pulley to the at least one drive pulley on the at least one hydrostatic transaxle.
  • 17. The machine of claim 12 further comprising: a parking brake system comprising:at least one brake engagement member actuatable to engage a parking brake on the at least one drive device;a cable mount carried by the subframe;a flexible cable having a sheath, wherein the sheath is coupled to the cable mount and the flexible cable is further coupled to the brake engagement member to actuate the brake engagement member to engage the parking brake on the at least one drive device,wherein the cable mount is carried on the subframe so as to not enable the flexible cable to actuate the brake engagement member through pivotal movement of the subframe alone.
  • 18. The machine of claim 17 further comprising a control member operably coupled to the flexible cable to move the flexible cable relative to the sheath to actuate the brake engagement member to engage the parking brake on the at least one drive.
  • 19. The machine of claim 18 further comprising a spring operably coupled between the flexible cable and the brake engagement member.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/018,020, filed Jun. 15, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/150,485, filed May 10, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,005,437, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/131,738, filed Mar. 11, 2015, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (113)
Number Name Date Kind
2756045 Savory Jul 1956 A
3311186 Kamlukin Mar 1967 A
3719371 Musgrave Mar 1973 A
3796275 Bouyer Mar 1974 A
3876226 Cutler Apr 1975 A
3940161 Allison Feb 1976 A
3954255 Keijzer et al. May 1976 A
4037389 Harkness Jul 1977 A
4042053 Sieren et al. Aug 1977 A
4102114 Estes Jul 1978 A
4132121 Clarke Jan 1979 A
4231215 Kias Nov 1980 A
4256292 Sullivan et al. Mar 1981 A
4367864 Eldeen Jan 1983 A
4449602 Dittmann, Jr. May 1984 A
4553381 Sonnenberg Nov 1985 A
4577712 Foote et al. Mar 1986 A
4592439 Collard et al. Jun 1986 A
4809796 Yamaoka et al. Mar 1989 A
4860850 Takahashi Aug 1989 A
4969533 Holm et al. Nov 1990 A
5012632 Kuhn May 1991 A
5042238 White et al. Aug 1991 A
5067933 Hardesty et al. Nov 1991 A
5090512 Mullet et al. Feb 1992 A
5343974 Rabek Sep 1994 A
5353580 Wolff Oct 1994 A
5367861 Murakawa et al. Nov 1994 A
5367864 Ogasawara et al. Nov 1994 A
5381647 Eberle Jan 1995 A
5433066 Wenzel et al. Jul 1995 A
5483787 Berrios Jan 1996 A
5487535 Carter et al. Jan 1996 A
5706907 Unruh Jan 1998 A
5799475 Borling et al. Sep 1998 A
5873224 Murakawa et al. Feb 1999 A
5946893 Gordon Sep 1999 A
5996982 Bell Dec 1999 A
6062333 Gordon May 2000 A
6098740 Abend et al. Aug 2000 A
6101794 Christopherson et al. Aug 2000 A
6170242 Gordon Jan 2001 B1
6178668 Gustafson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6244025 Ferris et al. Jun 2001 B1
6425452 Steiner et al. Jul 2002 B1
6460318 Ferris et al. Oct 2002 B1
6501678 Lenssen et al. Dec 2002 B1
6510678 Ferris et al. Jan 2003 B2
6711885 Ferris Mar 2004 B2
6830115 Okada et al. Dec 2004 B2
6857254 Melone et al. Feb 2005 B2
6874593 Abend et al. Apr 2005 B2
6902017 Ohashi Jun 2005 B2
6904985 Ferree et al. Jun 2005 B2
7078292 Park et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082759 Tsukamoto et al. Aug 2006 B1
7107746 Melone et al. Sep 2006 B2
7373871 Buescher May 2008 B1
7374187 Melone et al. May 2008 B2
7427247 Melone Sep 2008 B2
7475894 Hodge Jan 2009 B2
7494142 Wolter Feb 2009 B2
7503161 Mizukawa et al. Mar 2009 B1
7600769 Bessho et al. Oct 2009 B2
7694769 McGuire Apr 2010 B2
7708106 Bergman et al. May 2010 B1
7775314 Blais et al. Aug 2010 B2
7793745 Witt et al. Sep 2010 B2
7896123 Ohashi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7900943 Stewart Mar 2011 B2
7930813 Melone et al. Apr 2011 B2
7934579 Bowers May 2011 B2
8322736 Bowers Dec 2012 B2
8397367 Melone et al. Mar 2013 B2
8398101 Alexander et al. Mar 2013 B2
8517140 West et al. Aug 2013 B2
9161490 Melone et al. Oct 2015 B2
9481242 Melone et al. Nov 2016 B2
9597957 Weber et al. Mar 2017 B2
9707842 Melone et al. Jul 2017 B2
9849776 Melone et al. Dec 2017 B2
10005437 Slegelis et al. Jun 2018 B2
10093178 Melone et al. Oct 2018 B2
10093179 Melone et al. Oct 2018 B2
10421356 Weber et al. Sep 2019 B2
10464537 Slegelis et al. Nov 2019 B2
10882397 Melone et al. Jan 2021 B2
20020043422 Suzuki Apr 2002 A1
20020083694 Nagai Jul 2002 A1
20020179341 Boyer et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030000191 Papke Jan 2003 A1
20030127266 Kirkpatrick Jul 2003 A1
20030179341 Choo Sep 2003 A1
20030213625 Okada Nov 2003 A1
20040079063 Ishimori Apr 2004 A1
20040182057 Price Sep 2004 A1
20070209457 Irikura et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070283675 Hancock et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080302075 Eavenson, Sr. Dec 2008 A1
20090127813 Stewart May 2009 A1
20090218781 Sellars et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090241702 Osuga Oct 2009 A1
20110197419 Melone et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120248726 Batdorf et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130047567 Minoura Feb 2013 A1
20130291508 Melone et al. Nov 2013 A1
20150040531 Melone et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150078871 Eavenson et al. Mar 2015 A1
20170028844 Melone et al. Feb 2017 A1
20190184822 Vigen et al. Jun 2019 A1
20200156467 Weber et al. May 2020 A1
20200180573 Slegelis et al. Jun 2020 A1
20210122237 Melone et al. Apr 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
38 04 423 Aug 1988 DE
2004-055918 Feb 2004 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (43)
Entry
Complaint filed on Mar. 20, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs &Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc., 5:13-CV-0316 (TJM/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York.
Declaration of Clark J. Radcliffe in Support of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment filed on Jan. 7, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd;RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc., 5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 95 pages.
Declaration of Jeffrey M. Olson in Support of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment of Invalidity filed on Jan. 7, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs &Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc., 5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 306 pages.
Declaration of Jeffrey M. Olson in Support of Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief and Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness filed on Jan. 30, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd;RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc., 5:13- SV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 212 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/643,809, filed May 7, 2012, Slegelis et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/677,288, filed Jul. 30, 2012, Melone et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 62/131,738, filed Mar. 11, 2015, Slegelis et al.
Defendants' [Proposed] Amended L. Pal. R. 3.3-3.4 Disclosure or Non-inrnngement and Invalidity Contentions mailed on Nov. 1, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 {LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 86 pages.
Defendants' Amended L. Pal. R. 3.3-3.4 Disclosure of Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions mailed on Dec. 16, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs &Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 87 pages.
Defendants' Corrected Answer to Complaint and Defendant Denver Global Products, Inc.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial filed on Jun. 12, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 15 pages.
Defendants' L. Pal. R. 3.3-3.4 Disclosure of Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions mailed on Oct. 21, 2013 on Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd.; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 78 pages.
Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief filed on Jan. 30, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs& Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 30 pages.
Defendants' Preliminary Proposed Constructions and Preliminary Identification of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence mailed on Nov. 27, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs& Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 40 pages.
Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief filed on Mar. 3, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs& Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 29 pages.
Expert Declaration of Clark J. Radcliffe regarding Claim Term Definitions for Construction filed on Jan. 30, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs& Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 38 pages.
Expert Declaration of Timothy M. Hicks in Response to Defendants' Expert Declaration by Clark J. Radcliffe, PhD mailed on Dec. 23, 2013 in Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 9 pages.
Expert Declaration of Timothy M. Hicks Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 7,107,746 filed on Feb. 18, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; DenverGlobal Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 3 pages.
Joint Statement Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4.7 filed on Mar. 17, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd.; RATO North America; DenverGlobal Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 5 pages.
Letter Brief to Court regarding significant recent autnonty relating to Denver Global Products, Inc.'s pending Motion for Summary Judgement of Invalidity for Indefiniteness filed on Jun. 3, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 20 pages.
Letter Brief to Court regarding significant recent authority relating to the parties' claim construction briefing and Denver Global Products, Inc.'s pending Motion for Summary Judgement of Invalidity for Indefiniteness filed on Sep. 15, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., ID; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 17 pages.
Letter to Court addressing statements in Brigg's letter request filed on Feb. 21, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 2 pages.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness filed on Jan. 30, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 10 pages.
Memorandum-Decision and Order filed on Jul. 30, 2015 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-3V-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 18 pages.
Memorandum-Decision and Order filed on Sep. 30, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 40 pages.
Plaintiffs' Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rules 3.1 and 3.2 mailed on Sep. 19, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 28 pages.
Plaintiffs' Opening Claim Construction Brief filed on Jan. 30, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 32 pages.
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement of Invalidity for Indefiniteness filed on Feb. 18, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power So., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 33 pages.
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 6,510,678 filed on Jan. 30, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 31 pages.
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,107,746 filed on Jan. 30, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 32 pages.
Plaintiffs' Proposed Constructions and Identification of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evidence mailed on Nov. 27, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd.; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 78 pages.
Plaintiffs' Rebuttal Claim Construction Brief filed on Mar. 3, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 33 pages.
Plaintiffs' Responses and Objections to Rata's First Set of Interrogatories [Nos. 1-10] mailed Oct. 9, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 61 pages.
Plaintiffs' Responses and Objections to Rata's Second Set of Interrogatories [No. 11] mailed on Jan. 15, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 6 pages.
Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants' Answer to Corrected Counterclaims filed on Jul. 5, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 9 pages.
Replacement Exhibit 11 to Olson Declaration filed on Jan. 8, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 3 pages.
Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness filed on February J4, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power So., Ltd.; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 15 pages.
Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 6,510,678 filed on Feb. 10, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 14 pages.
Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,107,746 filed on Feb. 10, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 14 pages.
Supplemental Declaration of Jeffrey M. Olson in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity filed on Feb. 10, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 6 pages.
The Parties' Joint Claim Construction Statement Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 4.4 filed on Dec. 16, 2013 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 9 pages.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,678 filed on Jan. 7, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 27 pages.
Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,107,746 filed on Jan. 7, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power Co., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 19 pages.
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement for Invalidity for Indefiniteness filed on Feb. 18, 2014 in Briggs&Stratton Corporation, Briggs&Stratton Power Products Group, LLC v. Chongqing RATO Power So., Ltd; RATO North America; Denver Global Products, Inc.,5:13-CV-0316 (LEK/ATB), United States District Court, Northern District of New York, 33 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200180573 A1 Jun 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62131738 Mar 2015 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16018020 Jun 2018 US
Child 16596207 US
Parent 15150485 May 2016 US
Child 16018020 US