The present invention relates to machine tools and more particularly to reduction of alignment errors in such tools. It also concerns grinding wheels for use in machine tools.
Machine tools for precisely forming desired profiles on workpieces need to have high stiffness, accuracy and be capable of reliably repeatable operation.
One application at which the machine tool of the present invention is directed is the formation of end surfaces on ferrule connectors for optical fibres. A known ferrule connector configuration is shown in
The ferrule connector 2 of
The distal end of the alignment member 4 has a chamfered portion 16 and a convex spherical surface 18. The spherical surface 18 is angled so that its centre of curvature 19 is laterally displaced from the central axis 32 of the alignment member. The end face of the ferrule is angled and spherical to minimise reflections of the light at the fibre end and to combat insertion loss due to separation of the ends of the two fibres being connected together. The alignment member may be made of a ceramic material or stainless steel for example.
Known processes for shaping the end of a ferrule involve grinding a spherical angled face on a blank ferrule, inserting and bonding a fibre in the central bore of the ferrule, and then polishing the end of the combined ferrule and fibre.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,831,784 and 4,979,334 describe polishing apparatus for forming a spherical surface on the end of a ferrule connector using a compliant polishing pad.
The present invention provides a machine tool comprising:
The inventor has determined that, with such a machine tool, a workpiece may be precisely moved relative to a tool rotating about an axis parallel to the axes of two rotary drives, with the relative motion generated using the two rotary drives. The workpiece is offset from one rotary axis by the second support arm and the tool is offset from the first rotational reference axis by the first support arm. As the first and second rotational reference axes are spaced apart by a fixed distance, and the tool mount is fixed in position relative to the first support arm, their relative positions can be known with a high degree of accuracy and reliability, thereby increasing the precision with which the positions of the tool mount and workpiece mount relative to each other can be controlled. This configuration also means that the machine can be designed to exhibit a high stiffness, by avoiding the compliance that would otherwise be associated with traditional machine configurations that use stacked linear slides.
The precision of the machine (in combination with high machining loop stiffness) may mean that sub-surface damage during a grinding process is reduced to the extent that a polishing step is either minimal or not required at all.
The machine tool may be suitable for machining axisymmetric profiled features onto workpieces, with the shaping of ferrule connectors being one example of a suitable application.
References herein to one component being fixed in position relative to another preferably mean fixed in the sense of being unadjustably fixed in position, as opposed to being locked in a selected position which can be changed when an adjustment mechanism is unlocked.
In a preferred example, the control arrangement is configured to control the first and second rotary drives such that the workpiece mount follows a circular path relative to the first support arm in a plane perpendicular to the rotational reference axes. The inventor realised that it is possible to achieve such relative movement using only two support arms mounted on respective rotary drives. This circular motion is particularly suitable for ferrule end grinding as will be described further below.
In one implementation, one of the support arms is fixed in position (preferably unadjustably fixed rather than being adjustable and locked in a selected position) relative to the supporting base of the machine tool (and may itself be provided by the machine base). The rotary drive associated with that support is operable to rotate the rigid structure relative to that support arm and the machine base.
In an alternative implementation, the rigid structure is fixed in position (again preferably unadjustably fixed) relative to a supporting base of the machine tool (and may itself be provided by the machine base). In this configuration, each rotary drive is operable to rotate the respective support arm relative to the rigid structure and therefore the supporting base of the machine tool.
In a further preferred example, the first and second drives are the only drives of the machine tool which are operable to move the tool mount and the workpiece mount relative to each other in a plane perpendicular to the first and second rotational reference axes. By only using two machine drives a fixed distance apart, it is then possible to accurately calibrate the machine so that the tool mount and workpiece mount can be positioned with a high degree of accuracy. In contrast, in machine tools employing multiple inter-dependent driven axes of motion, the errors associated with each separate motion are cumulative and so it may be more difficult to accurately predict the tool and/or workpiece mount positions. The reference to the “only drives” here is in the sense of being the only drives operable in the manner defined when all drives of the machine are free to move, rather than when some drives are selectively locked.
The workpiece mount may be arranged to hold a workpiece in a fixed position rotationally with respect to the second support arm during machining of the workpiece carried by the workpiece mount. That is, there may be no workpiece rotation relative to the second support arm during machining of the workpiece. In some circumstances, the workpiece may be rotated to facilitate material removal, but a desired profile may be preferably machined (by grinding or polishing for example) onto the workpiece without any workpiece rotation relative to the second support arm.
Preferably, at least one of the tool mount and the workpiece mount is moveable relative to the rigid structure in a direction parallel to the first and second rotational reference axes. In this way, tool wear can be accommodated over time by slightly advancing the workpiece mount towards the tool mount, or vice versa. Also, in some cases it may be necessary to move the workpiece and tool mounts further apart whilst they are moved into position for the start of a machining process before they are then moved together. For example, in embodiments discussed below, the workpiece may need to pass over an outer portion of a grinding wheel before being moved in an axial direction to engage a groove on the grinding wheel.
For example, a drive may be provided to move one or both of the tool mount and the workpiece mount relative to the respective support arm, or one or both of the support arms may be drivable relative to the rigid structure in a direction parallel to the first and second rotational reference axes.
The second support arm may form part of a workpiece support which carries a plurality of workpiece mounts, each of which is spaced from the second rotational axis. This may enable multiple workpieces to be machined consecutively by loading them into the machine in a single initial set up procedure, thereby increasing the throughput of the machine.
The tool mount may be arranged to carry a grinding wheel with its central axis coaxial with the tool reference axis. The tool mount may include a rotary drive or spindle for rotating a tool mount thereon relative to the first support arm about the tool reference axis.
In some examples, the workpiece mount may be adapted to carry a fibre optic ferrule. It has been found that using machine tools embodying the invention, end features can be ground onto a combined ferrule and bonded fibre without causing any significant loss in optical transmission, which would normally be expected when grinding using conventional grinding machines. Known grinding processes tend to be too aggressive for the brittle material of the optical fibre, resulting in sub-surface damage.
Conventional glass grinding processes generally involve “brittle fracture”, in which the grinding abrasive microscopically shatters the surface of the workpiece to remove stock material. The removal of material leaves the surface covered in micro-cracks. Known glass grinding machines have poor machining loop stiffness and may be unable to accurately control the cut depth. Machine tools described here may be able to provide a highly accurate machining path which allows precise control of diamond edges in a conditioned grinding wheel. It may therefore be possible to promote ductile regime grinding where crack propagation at the material surface is substantially lower than that of brittle mode glass grinding, potentially around ten times lower. The process may therefore be substantially less aggressive in comparison known glass grinding processes.
A tool may be mounted on the tool mount which includes a surface in a plane perpendicular to the rotational reference axes which, in use of the machine tool, is brought into engagement with a workpiece held in the workpiece mount. The machine tool may then be able to move the workpiece along a predetermined path, relative to the tool mount and on this surface of the tool, in order to carry out a desired process on the workpiece. For example, the surface in the plane perpendicular to the rotational reference axes may be a grinding surface or a polishing surface. The surface may be rigid or compliant.
In preferred implementations, moving a workpiece over the surface of the tool in this manner enables formation of the desired profile on the workpiece (which may be an axisymmetric profile) without needing to rotate the workpiece mount relative to the second support arm. An axisymmetric profile may be formed by moving the workpiece along a circular path on the surface of the tool.
The present invention further provides a grinding wheel which may, for example, be suitable for grinding a fibre optic ferrule. The wheel comprises a wheel body having a central rotational axis about which the wheel is rotated in use, and a transverse side surface, wherein the transverse side surface includes at least one circular groove for grinding a workpiece, the groove having a central axis (perpendicular to the plane of the groove) which is coaxial with the central rotational axis of the wheel. The groove may be shaped so as to impart a desired profile on a workpiece ground by the grinding wheel. A workpiece may be moved by a machine tool around the circle defined by the groove as the grinding wheel rotates. This may machine an axisymmetric profile onto the workpiece. The desired profile may be achieved by moving the workpiece around the groove, without rotating the workpiece relative to its support.
In preferred examples, the transverse side surface of the wheel includes at least two concentric circular grooves. In some configurations, two of the grooves have different abrasive properties. The abrasive properties of the grooves may be selected from roughing, semi-finishing and polishing, for example.
Provision of two or more grooves, with each having different abrasive properties, may enable processing of a workpiece such as an optical fibre ferrule from grinding through to polishing whilst needing to carry out only a single workpiece set up procedure.
In some configurations, a groove with a larger diameter may be more abrasive than another groove with a smaller diameter. A groove with a large diameter will be longer and so as a result the grit in the longer groove will wear more slowly.
Accordingly, it may therefore be preferable to use coarser materials in the larger groove as it may see heavier usage. One or more grooves may be impregnated with polishing compound, to enable polishing as part of the machining operation.
Two grooves of the same wheel may have different profiles in a cross-sectional plane parallel to and including the central rotational axis of the wheel. This may enable the wheel to impart different profiles to the same or different parts of a workpiece during the same machine operation.
The present invention also provides a method of machining a workpiece using a machine tool as described herein, comprising the steps of:
In a preferred method, the workpiece follows a circular path in the rotating step relative to the tool, in a plane perpendicular to the rotational reference axes.
Preferably, the workpiece is fixed in position rotationally with respect to the second support arm during a machining operation. More particularly, the workpiece may be fixed in position rotationally about a longitudinal axis of the workpiece with respect to the second support arm. In a preferred method, the workpiece is held stationary relative to the second support arm during the machining process (such as grinding or polishing). This may be particularly beneficial when the workpiece is at one end of a bulky and/or long component, such as a fibre optic cable. As a result of the avoidance of rotation of the workpiece, no additional material handling difficulties are caused by rotation or added turns of a fibre optic cable coupled to the workpiece mount. Turns added to the cable would need to be relaxed or unwound before the cable is available for any further processing or storage.
In an implementation using a tool with two concentric grooves thereon, the workpiece is engaged in the engaging step with a first groove on the tool which lies on the circular path, and the method includes the further steps of:
A known ferrule connector configuration and embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings, wherein:
A circular groove 30 is formed in the front face 26. It is centred on the central axis 24 of the wheel. The groove is a shallow depression in the face of the wheel. The profile of the groove in a plane containing the central axis of the wheel may substantially correspond to part of a circle, or another generally curved or rounded profile, for example. In use of the wheel, a workpiece is brought into engagement with the surface of the groove. The surface may be prepared for grinding or polishing a workpiece as appropriate.
As shown in
A machine tool 40 embodying the present invention is shown in
A grinding wheel 20 is coupled to support arm 44 by a tool mount. The tool mount is coupled to a spindle arranged to rotate the grinding wheel about its central axis. Support arm 44 carries a workpiece mount 48. In
A wheel truing, dressing and conditioning spindle 50 is also shown in
In
The grinding wheel 20 preferably includes a relatively soft bonding material, such as a resin bond material or a light vitreous bond material, and may support a diamond grinding grit. The wheel abrasive is preferably diamond as the workpiece is likely to include glass for the fibre and probably a tough ceramic material for the ferrule.
When using this composition for the grinding surfaces of the grinding wheel, a wheel conditioning or dressing action is preferably carried out to open the wheel (that is, to remove bond material from around the diamond grit) and to cleave sharp, cutting facets onto the diamonds. Spindle 50 may be used in this procedure. The machine tool may be able to interchange wheels on the spindle in an automated manner so that a wheel suitable for this conditioning action is selected and mounted on the spindle.
The machine base 42 provides a rigid structure which supports respective rotary drives for the support arms 44 and 46 at a fixed distance apart. The front face 26 of the grinding wheel lies in a plane perpendicular to the rotational axes of the support arms. It faces towards a workpiece carried by workpiece mount 48 in a direction parallel with the rotational axes of the support arms. The support arms 44 and 46 are moveable by respective drives so as to move the workpiece and the grinding wheel relative to each other. The workpiece follows a path in a plane perpendicular to the rotational axes of the support arms over the surface of the grinding wheel. In particular, a workpiece may be moved relative to the grinding wheel (at a constant speed for example) so that it follows a circular path along the groove, around the central axis of the grinding wheel.
A plan view, a perspective view, a side view and a rear view of a machine tool having a configuration similar to that of the machine tool as shown in
In
In an embodiment shown, the first support arm carrying the grinding wheel is shorter than the second support arm carrying the workpiece. However, this may not necessarily be the case in other embodiments. The lengths of the arms may be selected as appropriate to suit the geometries of different circumstances and applications.
Alternatively, the support for the tool may be fixed in position instead, and a workpiece (carried on arm 44) moved relative to it by rigid support 42 and support arm 44. This approach may be preferable in some circumstances as the workpiece is likely to be significantly lighter than the tool. Also, it may be preferable for the tool to be on a stationary support as it may need various additional services fed to it.
Relative rotation between components of the machine tools described herein may be achieved using rolling element bearings. Alternatively, hydrostatic or aerostatic bearings may be employed. Preferably, the support arms are mounted on hydrostatic bearings and aerostatic bearings are used in the tool spindle. Forming spindles may use aerostatic or rolling element bearings as appropriate. Where hydrostatic bearings are used, a higher viscosity of oil is preferably used in order to keep the associated hydrostatic system size to a minimum.
Preferably, a high resolution encoder is associated with each of the two support arms to ensure that their relative positions can be controlled with a high level of precision to shape and finish the surface of the workpiece.
In the machine tools depicted in the drawings, a rigid grinding wheel is shown mounted on the tool mount by way of example. It will be appreciated that the machine tool may be used in combination with other tools for movement by the machine tool relative to a workpiece mounted in the machine. In the case of machining an optic fibre ferrule, a tool providing a compliant abrasive surface may be used instead for example.
The grinding wheel includes a plurality of concentric circular grooves 92 formed in a transverse side surface 94.
The grinding wheel comprises an integrally formed support body and hub member 96. A set of bolt holes 98 extends axially through the hub portion to enable the wheel to be fastened to a tool mount on a spindle.
The wheel has a number of sets of grooves, each having different grinding properties. A plurality (three in this example) of concentric abrasive sections are mounted on a supporting transverse surface 100 of the support body 96. Each section defines a set of concentric grooves (three in this example). Each section may include a different abrasive grit. For example, they may be constructed so as to be suitable for roughing, semi-finishing and polishing operations. One section may differ from another in terms of the size of the abrasive grain used, the bonding material and/or the density of each section. Each groove may have the same cross-sectional profile as the others in a transverse plane which includes the central axis of the wheel. Alternatively, different grooves may have different profiles. The profile of each groove in a plane containing the central axis of the wheel may substantially correspond to part of a circle (in one example, substantially semi-circular), or another generally curved or rounded profile, for example.
The provision of multiple grooves on the same wheel may reduce the frequency with which it is necessary to carry out a wheel conditioning cycle by increasing the total groove length presented by the wheel.
It will be appreciated that references herein to perpendicular or parallel relative orientations and the like are to be interpreted as defining substantially perpendicular or substantially parallel relationships between components within practical tolerances.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1701246 | Jan 2017 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2018/050184 | 1/22/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/138481 | 8/2/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2309016 | Ryan | Jan 1943 | A |
4461121 | Motzer et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4587768 | Doyle | May 1986 | A |
4831784 | Takahashi | May 1989 | A |
4979334 | Takahashi | Dec 1990 | A |
5007209 | Saito | Apr 1991 | A |
5038524 | Moulin | Aug 1991 | A |
5231587 | Frost | Jul 1993 | A |
5351327 | Lurie et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
6099238 | Tsubota | Aug 2000 | A |
6755719 | Yoshida | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6814651 | Enomoto | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6951508 | Brubacher | Oct 2005 | B1 |
8376685 | Pietrantonio | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8771042 | Pepin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
10518337 | Kschier | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20030190875 | Grabbe | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20110288677 | Meidar et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202825575 | Mar 2013 | CN |
0239918 | Oct 1987 | EP |
0706853 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0937543 | Aug 1999 | EP |
2535640 | May 1984 | FR |
2476468 | Jun 2011 | GB |
2481632 | Jan 2012 | GB |
2491020 | Nov 2012 | GB |
2000137144 | May 2000 | JP |
2008055593 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008238389 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2015077648 | Apr 2015 | JP |
WO 2011077127 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2015192784 | Dec 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English language abstract of French Patent Publication No. FR 2535640 Al, European Patent Office, May 11, 1984. |
English language abstract of Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2000137144 A, European Patent Office, May 16, 2000. |
English language abstract of Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2008055593 A, European Patent Office, Mar. 13, 2008. |
English language abstract of Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2008238389 A, European Patent Office, Oct. 9, 2008. |
English language abstract of Chinese Utility Model Publication No. CN 202825575 U, European Patent Office, Mar. 27, 2013. |
English language abstract of Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 2015077648 A, European Patent Office, Apr. 23, 2015. |
English language abstract of PCT Patent Application Publication No. WO 2015/192784 Al, European Patent Office, Dec. 23, 2015. |
Search Report issued in connection with United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB 1701246.9, 1 page, United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, dated May 26, 2017. |
Search Report issued in connection with United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB 1701246.9, 2 pages, United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, dated Sep. 21, 2017. |
Search Report issued in connection with United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB 1800990.2, 1 page, United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, dated Jul. 4, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190351523 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |