The present application is based on, and claims priority from, Taiwan Application Serial Number 107143557, filed Dec. 5, 2018, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The present disclosure relates to an automatic generation system, and in particular it relates to a machining parameter automatic generation system for performing a machining program of a machine tool.
Most existing machining programs are compiled by engineers using software such as computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) for tool path planning. However, various machining parameters, such as speed, feed, depth of cut, etc., must be based on experience or reference data, and then multiple trials are needed to obtain more appropriate parameters. It takes a lot of time and costs a lot of money to process workpieces with complex geometric shapes or new materials.
In view of the information above, the present disclosure provides an automatic processing parameter generation system, which combines the feature recognition of the machine learning method. From the existing machining information and artificially generated data, related data is extracted. The related data is input into the machine learning model for training, and a model for selecting appropriate machining parameters is obtained to improve machining planning and machining efficiency, which may effectively improve the aforementioned issues with time and cost.
An machining parameter automatic generation system according to the present disclosure includes: a geometric data capturing module that captures a geometric shape of a workpiece to generate a candidate feature list; a feature recognition learning network that trains a candidate feature list according to a neural network model to obtain a applicable features list; and a machining parameter learning network. The applicable feature list and candidate machining parameters are trained according to another neural network model to obtain optimized applicable machining parameters.
It should be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary only, and are intended to provide further explanation of the disclosure as claimed.
The following description is of the best-contemplated mode of carrying out the disclosure. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the disclosure and should not be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the disclosure is best determined by reference to the appended claims.
Please refer to
After an applicable feature list is determined, in a training process, the machining parameter data generating module 131 (hereinafter referred to as the parameter module 131) simultaneously generates a machining parameter of an initial version according to the design image file STP. The machining parameter can be, such as a tool, a method, a rotation speed, a feed and/or other materials. The machining parameter of the initial version is then transferred to the machining performance evaluation module 132 (hereinafter referred to as the evaluation module 132). The machining parameter is evaluated by virtual processing to generate the processing time, cutting force, etc. that corresponds to the above parameter data. The result may not meet the processing requirements, such as long processing time or excessive cutting force. Thus, it will be returned to the parameter module 131 for re-generation and evaluation until it finally meets the requirements. The machining parameter of current version is then passed to the parameter network 13.
After receiving the candidate machining parameters, the parameter network 13 performs learning training with another neural network model along with the applicable feature list to finally determine or select a modified or optimized applicable machining parameter. Although the aforementioned parameter network 13 is called a network, it is actually a calculation module, though it is not limited thereto.
When an applicable machining parameter is finally determined, the automatic generation of the machining parameters of the generation system 10 is completed. The entire process does not require intervention or adjustment by the engineer. For example, the applicable machining parameter for this version will be transmitted to the external or internal computer-aided manufacturing software CAM of the generation system 10 to generate a machining program that includes a tool path. The machining program is finally read by the machine tool MT for processing.
The machining parameter automatic generation system can finally determine an applicable machining parameter from the design drawing file of the workpiece. The machining parameter automatic generation system can also generate the machining program indirectly or directly, by automatically generating and extracting features, generating machining parameters, and evaluating machining efficiency. The machining parameter automatic generation system has changed the way of relying on engineer. The machining parameter automatic generation system not only saves time and cost, but also the degree of accuracy and optimization will be perfected with learning and training. It has the conditions for patentability.
Although the disclosure has been illustrated and described with respect to one or more implementations, equivalent alterations and modifications will occur or be known to others skilled in the art upon the reading and understanding of this specification and the annexed drawings. In addition, while a particular feature of the disclosure may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such a feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
107143557 A | Dec 2018 | TW | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3872756 | Pearson | Mar 1975 | A |
6363298 | Shin et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
7643027 | Rothstein et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7933679 | Kulkarni | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8150545 | Jahn | Apr 2012 | B2 |
9886529 | Kannan et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20160075028 | Bain | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170090459 | Koga | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20190152054 | Ishikawa | May 2019 | A1 |
20190258925 | Li | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101817163 | Sep 2010 | CN |
102289537 | Dec 2011 | CN |
108115232 | Jun 2018 | CN |
201518887 | May 2015 | TW |
I518469 | Jan 2016 | TW |
Entry |
---|
Taiwanese Office Action and Search Report dated Aug. 26, 2019, for corresponding Taiwanese Application No. 107143557. |
Joshi et al., “Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model”, Computer-Aided Design, vol. 20, No. 2, Mar. 1988, pp. 58-66. |
Kuss et al., “Manufacturing task description for robotic welding and automatic feature recognition on product CAD models”, Elsevier, Procedia CIRP, vol. 60, 2017, pp. 122-127. |
Lau et al., “Development of a computer-integrated system to support CAD to CAPP”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, vol. 26, Issue 9-10, 2005, pp. 1032-1042. |
Subrahmanyam et al., “An overview of automatic feature recognition techniques for computer-aided process planning”, Elsevier, Computers in Industry, vol. 26, 1995, pp. 1-21. |
Sunil et al., “Automatic recognition of features from freeform surface CAD models”, Elsevier, Computer-Aided Design, vol. 40, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 502-517. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200184720 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |