Patent Grant
7521420
The present invention relates to novel conformationally-defined macrocyclic compounds, pharmaceutical compositions comprising same and intermediates used in their manufacture. More particularly, the invention relates to macrocyclic compounds that have been demonstrated to selectively antagonize the activity of the motilin receptor. The invention further relates to macrocyclic compounds useful as therapeutics for a range of gastrointestinal disorders, in particular those in which malfunction of gastric motility or increased motilin secretion is observed, such as hypermotilinemia, irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia.
A number of peptide hormones are involved in the control of the different functions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including absorption, secretion, blood flow and motility (Mulvihill, et al. in Basic and Clinical Endocrinology, 4th edition, Greenspan, F. S.; Baxter, J. D., eds., Appleton & Lange: Norwalk, Conn., 1994, pp 551-570). Since interactions between the brain and GI system are critical to the proper modulation of these functions, these peptides can be produced locally in the GI tract or distally in the CNS.
One of these peptide hormones, motilin, a linear 22-amino acid peptide, plays a critical regulatory role in the GI physiological system though governing of fasting gastrointestinal motor activity. As such, the peptide is periodically released from the duodenal mucosa during fasting in mammals, including humans. More precisely, motilin exerts a powerful effect on gastric motility through the contraction of gastrointestinal smooth muscle to stimulate gastric emptying, decrease intestinal transit time and initiate phase III of the migrating motor complex in the small bowel (Itoh, Z., Ed., Motilin, Academic Press: San Diego, Calif., 1990, ASIN: 0123757304; Nelson, D. K. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1996, 41, 2006-2015; Peeters, T. L.; Vantrappen, G.; Janssens, J. Gastroenterology 1980, 79, 716-719).
Motilin exerts these effects through receptors located predominantly on the human antrum and proximal duodenum, although its receptors are found in other regions of the GI tract as well (Peeters, T. L.; Bormans, V.; Vantrappen, G. Regul. Pept. 1988, 23, 171-182). Therefore, motilin hormone is involved in motility of both the upper and lower parts of the GI system (Williams et al. Am. J. Physiol. 1992, 262, G50-G55). In addition, motilin and its receptors have been found in the CNS and periphery, suggesting a physiological role in the nervous system that has not yet been definitively elucidated (Depoortere, I.; Peeters, T. L. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 272, G994-999 and O'Donohue, T. L et al. Peptides 1981, 2, 467-477). For example, motilin receptors in the brain have been suggested to play a regulatory role in a number of CNS functions, including feeding and drinking behavior, micturition reflex, central and brain stem neuronal modulation and pituitary hormone secretion (Itoh, Z. Motilin and Clinical Applications. Peptides 1997, 18, 593-608; Asakawa, A.; Inui, A.; Momose, K.; et al., M. Peptides 1998, 19, 987-990 and Rosenfeld, D. J.; Garthwaite, T. L. Physiol. Behav. 1987, 39, 753-756). Physiological studies have provided confirmatory evidence that motilin can indeed have an effect on feeding behavior (Rosenfeld, D. J.; Garthwaite, T. L. Phys. Behav. 1987, 39, 735-736).
The recent identification and cloning of the human motilin receptor (WO 99/64436) has simplified and accelerated the search for agents which can modulate its activity for specific therapeutic purposes.
Due to the critical and direct involvement of motilin in control of gastric motility, agents that either diminish (hypomotility) or enhance (hypermotility) the activity at the motilin receptor, are a particularly attractive area for further investigation in the search for new effective pharmaceuticals towards these indications.
Peptidic agonists of the motilin receptor, which have clinical application for the treatment of hypomotility disorders, have been reported (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,695,952; 5,721,353; 6,018,037; 6,380,158; 6,420,521, U.S. Appl. 2001/0041791, WO 98/42840; WO 01/00830 and WO 02/059141). Derivatives of erythromycin, commonly referred to as motilides, have also been reported as agonists of the motilin receptor (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,920,102; 5,008,249; 5,175,150; 5,418,224; 5,470,961; 5,523,401, 5,554,605; 5,658,888; 5,854,407; 5,912,235; 6,100,239; 6,165,985; 6,403,775).
Antagonists of the motilin receptor are potentially extremely useful as therapeutic treatments for diseases associated with hypermotility and hypermotilinemia, including irritable bowel syndrome, dyspepsia, gastroesophogeal reflux disorders, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, pancreatitis, infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, diabetes mellitus, obesity, malabsorption syndrome, carcinoid syndrome, diarrhea, atrophic colitis or gastritis, gastrointestinal dumping syndrome, postgastroenterectomy syndrome, gastric stasis and eating disorders leading to obesity.
A variety of peptidic compounds have been described as antagonists of the motilin receptor (Depoortere, I.; Macielag, M. J.; Galdes, A.; Peeters, T. L. Eur J. Pharmacol. 1995, 286, 241-247; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,470,830; 6,255,285; 6,586,630; 6,720,433; U.S. 2003/0176643; WO 02/64623). These peptidic antagonists suffer from the known limitations of peptides as drug molecules, in particular poor oral bioavailability and degradative metabolism.
Cyclization of peptidic derivatives is a method employed to improve the properties of a linear peptide both with respect to metabolic stability and conformational freedom. Cyclic molecules tend to be more resistant to metabolic enzymes. Such cyclic tetrapeptide motilin antagonists have been reported (Haramura, M. et al J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 670-675, U.S. 2003/0191053; WO 02/16404).
Other motilin antagonists, which are non-peptidic and non-cyclic in nature have also been reported (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,972,939; 6,384,031; 6,392,040; 6,423,714; 6,511,980; 6,624,165; 6,667,309; U.S. 2002/0111484; 2001/041701; 2002/0103238; 2001/0056106, 2002/0013352; 2003/0203906 and 2002/0002192)
The macrocyclic motilin antagonists of the present invention comprise elements of both peptidic and non-peptidic structures in a combination which has not been pursued for this application previously.
Indeed, the structural features of antagonists of the present invention are different. In particular, within the known motilin antagonists which are cyclic peptides, it was found that such derivatives containing D-amino acids were devoid of activity. In contrast, for the tripeptidomimetic compounds of the present invention, the D-stereochemistry is required for two of the three building elements.
The motilin antagonists of the present invention are also distinct from the prior art in that they comprise a tether element to fulfill the dual role of controlling conformations and providing additional sites for interaction either through hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding or dipole-dipole interactions.
In a first aspect, the present invention is directed to compounds of formula (I):
and pharmaceutically acceptable salts, hydrates or solvates thereof wherein:
Z1, Z2 and Z3 are independently selected from the group consisting of O, N and NR10, wherein R10 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, lower alkyl, and substituted lower alkyl;
R1 is independently selected from the group consisting of lower alkyl substituted with aryl, lower alkyl substituted with substituted aryl, lower alkyl substituted with heteroaryl and lower alkyl substituted with substituted heteroaryl;
R2 is hydrogen;
R3 is independently selected from the group consisting of alkyl and cycloalkyl with the proviso that when Z1 is N, R3 can form a four, five, six or seven-membered heterocyclic ring together with Z1;
R4 is hydrogen;
R5 and R6 are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, cycloalkyl, substituted cycloalkyl, heterocyclic, substituted heterocyclic, aryl, substituted aryl, heteroaryl and substituted heteroaryl, with the proviso that at least one of R5 and R6 is hydrogen;
X is selected from the group consisting of O, NR8, and N(R9)2+;
In a second aspect, the invention also proposes compounds of formula (I) which are antagonists of the motilin receptor.
In a third aspect, the invention proposes a method of treating a disorder associated with the motilin receptor or motility dysfunction in humans and other mammals, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of formula (1).
While the invention will be described in conjunction with example embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to such embodiment. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included as defined by the appended claims.
Preferably in formula (I), as depicted hereinabove, R1 is selected from the group consisting of —(CH2)qR11, and —CHR12R13
Preferably, R11, R12 and R13 are selected from the group consisting of:
wherein Ra and Rb are chosen from the group consisting of Cl, F, CF3, OCH3, OH, and C(CH3)3 and CH3.
Also preferably, R3 in formula (I), is selected from the group consisting of:
The tether portion (T) of formula (I) is preferably selected from the group consisting of:
wherein L1 is O, NH or NMe; L2 is CH or N; L3 is CH or N; L4 is O or CH2; L5 is CH or N L6 is CR52R53 or O; R46 is H or CH3;
R52, R53, R54, R55, R56 and R57 are independently selected from hydrogen, lower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, hydroxy, alkoxy, aryloxy, amino, and oxo; or R52 together with R53 or R54 together with R55 or R56 together with R57 can independently form a three to seven-membered cyclic ring comprising carbon, oxygen, sulfur and/or nitrogen atoms;
(X) is the site of a covalent bond to X in formula (I); and
(Z3) is the site of a covalent bond to Z3 in formula (I).
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, there are provided compounds of formula (I) wherein m, n and p are 0, X, Z1, Z2 and Z3 are NH and R2, R4 and R5 are hydrogen, represented by formula (III):
According to another aspect of the invention, there are provided compounds of formula (I) wherein when Z1 is a nitrogen atom, R3 forms a four, five, six or seven-membered heterocyclic ring together with Z1, represented by formula (IV):
wherein said heterocyclic ring may contain a second nitrogen atom, or an oxygen, or sulfur atom
n2 is selected from 0, 1, 2 or 3
R7 is optionally present and is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, substituted alkyl, cycloalkyl, substituted cycloalkyl, heterocyclic, substituted heterocyclic, aryl, substituted aryl, heteroaryl, substituted heteroaryl, hydroxy, alkoxy, aryloxy, oxo, amino, halogen, formyl, acyl, carboxy, carboxyalkyl, carboxyaryl, amido, carbamoyl, guanidino, ureido, amidino, mercapto, sulfinyl, sulfonyl and sulfonamido.
It is to be understood, that in the context of the present invention, the terms amino, guanidine, ureido and amidino encompass substituted derivatives thereof as well.
Preferably, the invention provides a method of treating a disorder associated with hypermotility or hypermotilinemia in humans and other mammals comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of formula (1).
HPLC (standard gradient) tR=8.46 min
Chiral material can be accessed by starting with the chiral epoxide. For example, the (S)-isomer of T38 was constructed in 89% overall yield from (S)-propylene oxide.
Although preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail herein and illustrated in the accompanying structures, schemes and tables, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these precise embodiments and that various changes and modifications may be effected therein without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention.
Specifically preferred compounds of the present invention, include, but are not limited to:
In addition to the preferred tethers (T) illustrated previously, other specific tethers employed for compounds of the invention are shown hereinbelow:
In a preferred embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of treating irritable bowel syndrome, dyspepsia, Crohn's disease, gastroesophogeal reflux disorders, ulcerative colitis, pancreatitis, infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, carcinoid syndrome, malabsorption syndrome, diarrhea, diabetes mellitus, obesity, postgastroenterectomy syndrome, atrophic colitis or gastritis, gastric stasis, gastrointestinal dumping syndrome, celiac disease and eating disorders leading to obesity in humans and other mammals comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of formula (I).
Synthetic Methods
A. General Information
The compounds of Formula I can be synthesized using traditional solution synthesis techniques or solid phase chemistry methods. In either, the construction involves four phases: first, synthesis of the building blocks, including one to four moieties, comprising recognition elements for the biological target receptor, plus one tether moiety, primarily for control and definition of conformation. These building blocks are assembled together, typically in a sequential fashion, in a second phase employing standard chemical transformations. The precursors from the assembly are then cyclized in the third stage to provide the macrocyclic structures. Finally, a post-cyclization processing stage involving removal of protecting groups and optional purification then provides the desired final compounds (see
D. Procedures for the Synthesis of Representative Tethers of the Present Invention
The important tether component required for compounds of the invention are synthesized as described in WO01/25257, U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. Ser. No. 60/491,248 or herein. A standard procedure for the synthesis of tether B is shown in
A standard procedure for the synthesis of tether T9 is shown in
Tether T9 can also be synthesized from T8 by reduction as in step T9-3 or with other appropriate hydrogenation catalysts known to those in the art.
A standard procedure for the synthesis of Ddz propargylamine is shown in
In a dried three-neck flask, a solution of propargylamine (53.7 g, 0.975 mol, 1.5 eq) in degassed DMF (Drisolv, 388 mL) was treated with Ddz-N3 (170.9 g, 0.65 mol, 1.0 eq), tetramethylguanidine (TMG, 81.4 mL, 0.65 mol, 1.0 eq) and DIPEA (113.1 mL, 0.65 mol, 1.0 eq) and stirred at 50° C. O/N. The reaction was monitored by TLC (conditions:25/75 EtOAc/hex. Rf: 0.25; detection: UV, ninhydrin). Upon completion, DMF was evaporated under reduced pressure until dryness and the residue dissolved in Et2O (1 L). The organic solution was washed sequentially with citrate buffer (pH 4.5, 3×), saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate (2×), and brine (2×), then dried with MgSO4, filtered and the filtrate evaporated under reduced pressure. A pale orange solid was obtained. This solid was triturated with 1% EtOAc in hex, then collected by filtration and dried under vacuum (oil pump) to provide the desired product (153.4 g, 85.2%).
A standard procedure for the synthesis of tether T10 is shown in
Two alternative routes to this tether have been developed. The first synthetic approach proceeded starting from the commercially available monobenzoate of resorcinol (T10-0). Mitsunobu reaction under standard conditions with the protected amino alcohol from Example 9, followed by saponification of the benzoate provided T10-1 in good yield after recrystallization. Alkylation of the phenol with 2-bromoethanol using the optimized conditions shown permitted the desired product Ddz-T10 to be obtained after dry pack purification in 42% yield.
A second synthetic route to T10 is shown in
From resorcinol, two successive Mitsunobu reactions are conducted with the appropriate two carbon synthons illustrated, themselves derived from 2-aminoethanol and ethylene glycol, respectively, through known protection methodologies. Lastly, deprotection of the silyl ether, also under standard conditions provided Boc-T10.
Although the yields in the two methods are comparable, the first required less mechanical manipulation and is preferred for larger scales.
A standard procedure for the synthesis of tether T11 is shown in
A standard procedure for the synthesis of tether T12 is shown in
In a 3-L flame-dried three-neck flask, a solution of (aminomethyl)phenylthiobenzyl alcohol (12-0, 96 g, 0.39 mol) in degassed DMF (1 L, 0.4 M) was prepared. To this was added DdzN3 (0.95 eq), followed by TMG (0.39 mol, 49 mL). The reaction was stirred for 10 min, then DIPEA (68 mL, 0.39 mol) added. The mixture was heated at 50° C. under N2 until TLC indicated no DdzN3 remained (48 h typically). (TLC eluent: EtOAc:Hex 50:50; detection: ninhydrin). Upon completion, to the reaction mixture was added 3 L citrate buffer and the separated aqueous layer extracted with Et2O (3×1500 mL). The combined organic phase was washed sequentially with citrate buffer (2×200 mL), water (2×200 mL) and brine (2×200 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered and the filtrate evaporated under reduced pressure. A dark orange oil was obtained, which was purified by dry-pack. For this procedure, the oil was first dissolved in EtOAc:Hex:DCM:TEA (20:80:1:0.5, v/v/v/v). At this point, a little extra DCM was sometimes required to ensure complete dissolution. The solution was loaded onto the column, then the column eluted with EtOAc:Hex:DCM:Et3N (20:80:1:0.5) until all the impurities were separated out as indicated by TLC, paying particular attention to that closest to the desired product. The elution was then continued with EtOAc:Hex:Et3N 30:70:0.5 (v/v/v) and finally with EtOAc:hexanes:Et3N (50:50:0.5) to elute the desired product. After removal of the solvent from the fractions containing the product under reduced pressure, the residue was dissolved in the minimum amount of DCM, a three-fold larger volume of hexanes added, then the solvents again evaporated under reduced pressure. This treatment was repeated until an off-white foam was obtained. The lafter solidified while drying under vacuum (oil pump). Alternatively, the material yielded a solid after sequential concentration with DCM (1×) and hexanes (2×). Tether Ddz-T12 was obtained as an off-white solid (85-90% yield).
To a 0.2 M solution of the appropriate tether (1.5 eq) in THF or THF-toluene (1:1) was added the PPh3-DIAD (pre-formed by mixing equivalent amounts of the reagents and isolated by evaporation of solvent, see Example 29-C) adduct (1.0 eq.). The resultant mixture was manually agitated for 10 sec (the solution remained turbid), then added to the resin. Alternatively, the resin was added to the solution. The reaction suspension was agitated O/N (after ˜5 min the mixture becomes limpid). The resin was filtered and washed 2×DCM, 1× toluene, 1×EtOH, 1× toluene, 1×(DCM/MeOH), 1×(THF/MeOH), 1×(DCM/MeOH), 1×(THF/MeOH), 2×DCM, then dried in the standard manner.
To a 0.2 M solution of the appropriate tether (4 eq) in THF or THF-toluene (1:1) was added triphenylphosphine (4 eq). The resultant mixture was manually shaken until a homogenous solution was obtained, then added to the resin. Alternatively, the resin (or IRORI™ MiniKans® (NEXUS Biosystems, Poway, Calif.), miniaturized microreactors, containing resin) was added to the solution. To this suspension was then added DIAD (3.9 eq) and the reaction agitated O/N. Note: Since the reaction is exothermic, for larger scales, the reaction should be cooled in an ice bath. In addition, an appropriate vent must be supplied to allow any pressure build-up to be released. The resin was filtered and washed DCM (2×), toluene (1×), EtOH (1×), toluene (1×), DCM/MeOH (1×), 1×THF/MeOH (1×), DCM/MeOH (1×), THF/MeOH (1×), 2×DCM, then dried in the standard manner.
A procedure for the synthesis of PPh3-DIAD adduct is shown in
DIAD (1 eq) was added dropwise to a well-stirred solution of triphenylphosphine (1 eq) in THF (0.4 M) at 0° C. under nitrogen. The mixture was then maintained at 0° C. with stirring for 30 min. The white solid obtained was collected by filtration (use medium sized fritted filters), washed with cold anhydrous THF until the washes were colorless, and lastly washed once with anhydrous Et2O. The white solid product was then vacuum-dried (oil pump) and stored under nitrogen. (Note: The PPh3-DIAD adduct can be made in larger than immediately required quantity and stored under nitrogen; it is very important to store this reagent under anhydrous conditions.)
In certain instances, the Mitsunobu process of Example 29 cannot be applied or is not efficient for incorporation of the tether. Hence, reductive amination has been developed as an alternative that can be employed for tether incorporation as illustrated hereinbelow for one of the preferred tethers. Similar chemistry can be used to incorporate other tethers of the present invention.
The Tether (30-2) with the amine protected as its Ddz derivative was efficiently oxidized to the corresponding aldehyde 30-2 using SO3.pyr in DMSO-Et3N-DCM. This aldehyde (0.14 mmol, 56 mg, 1.5 eq based upon loading of resin support) was dissolved in a 1:3 mixture of TMOF-MeOH (DriSolv, 4 mL) at rt. To this was added the resin containing the tripeptide (30-1, as its trifluoroacetic acid salt from the deprotection of the terminal amine), the mixture was agitated briefly to wet the resin, and then borane-pyridine complex (as the commercially available 8 M solution, 23 μL, 2 eq) was introduced to the suspension. The reaction was agitated O/N, then the resin filtered, washed with DCM (2×), THF (1×), DCM/MeOH [3:1] (1×), THF/MeOH [3:1] (1×), DCM (2×) and dried in the standard manner. Care must be taken to ensure that the desired resin bound product 30-3 is not contaminated with the dialkylated material. However, even if the reaction does not proceed to completion or if a small amount of the dialkylation side product is present, the material is of sufficient purity for the macrocyclization reaction.
A standard procedure for the synthesis of tether T28 is shown in
Henry reaction of 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde 28-0 provided 28-1 in 79% yield. This was followed by reduction first with sodium borohydride, then with catalytic hydrogenation, to give the amine, which was then protected as its Boc derivative, 28-2. Yields of these first two steps were lower on larger scales. Alkylation of 28-2 with the TBDMS ether of 2-bromoethanol, itself synthesized by standard methods, gave 28-3 in 74% yield. Deprotection of the silyl ether under standard conditions yielded the desired protected tether, Boc-T28. Alternative use of ethylene carbonate for the phenol alkylation to avoid the protection/deprotection steps, gave 73% yield.
A standard procedure for the synthesis of tether T32 is shown in
A standard procedure for the synthesis of tether T33a and T33b is shown in
The construction to the (R)-isomer of this tether (T33a) was accomplished from 2-iodophenol (33-0) and (S)-methyl lactate (33-A). Mitsunobu reaction of 33-0 and 33-A proceeded with inversion of configuration in excellent yield to give 33-1. Reduction of the ester to the corresponding alcohol (33-2) also occurred in high yield and was followed by Sonagashira reaction with Ddz-propargylamine. The alkyne in the resulting coupling product, 33-3, was reduced with catalytic hydrogenation. Workup with scavenger resin provided the desired product, Ddz-T33a.
The synthesis of the (S)-enantiomer (Ddz-T33b) was carried out in an identical manner in comparable yield starting from (R)-methyl lactate (33-B). See
Standard procedures for the synthesis of various tethers are shown in the figures: tether T34 (
E. Examples of Synthetic Strategies for the Macrocyclic Compounds of the Invention
It should be noted that one or more of the amino acids indicated can be replaced by corresponding hydroxy acids and coupled to the next building block utilizing methods known to those in the art.
The resin containing the cyclization precursor is combined in an appropriate vessel with pre-washed MP-carbonate resin [Argonaut Technologies, Foster City, Calif., commercially supplied MP-carbonate resin was treated with 3×THF (1 L per 400 g) and dried O/N at 30° C. in a vacuum oven] (1.4 to 1.6 eq relative to the initial loading of the synthesis resin). A 0.2 M DIPEA solution in THF was then added to the combined resins (1 mL/60 mg MP-carbonate resin) and the suspension agitated O/N at rt. Subsequently, the resin was filtered and rinsed 2×THF. The combined filtrates are collected together in an appropriate vessel, then the volatile contents evaporated under reduced pressure [in addition to the standard methods, solvent can also be removed in vacuo using centrifugal evaporation (ThermoSavant Discovery®, SpeedVac® or comparable) (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, Mass.)] to provide the crude macrocycles.
Standard Procedure for Silver-Assisted Macrocyclization with Thioester Linker Except for the cyclization itself and subsequent work-up, this procedure is identical to that of Example 47. The resin containing the cyclization precursor was combined in an appropriate vessel with pre-washed MP-carbonate resin [Argonaut Technologies, commercially supplied MP-carbonate resin was treated with THF (3×, 1 L per 400 g) and dried O/N at 30° C. in a vacuum oven] (1.4 to 1.6 eq relative to the initial loading of the synthesis resin). To this was added THF (1 mL per 100 mg resin) and silver trifluoroacetate (1 eq relative to the initial loading of the resin). Finally, an amount of DIPEA sufficient to obtain a 0.2 M solution was added. The reaction mixture was agitated at rt O/N. The solution was then filtered and the resins washed 2×THF. The filtrates are collected together in an appropriate vessel, then evaporated under reduced pressure [(the volatile contents could also be removed in vacuo using centrifugal evaporation (ThermoSavant Discovery®, SpeedVac® or comparable)] to provide the crude macrocycles. For this procedure, silver trifluoroacetate should be stored in a dessicator between uses. In addition, it is recommended to use a new bottle of THF (or a bottle that has been recently opened under N2 or Ar) to minimize formation of silver oxide.
Additionally, a ring-closing metathesis (RCM) strategy, as developed by Grubbs et al. can also be used to access some of the macrocyclic compounds of the invention (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,811,515; Grubbs, R. H. et al. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,5291-5300; Fürstner, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3012-3043).
To access certain derivatives of compounds of the present invention, additional reactions from those in the general scheme were required. For some, it was advantageous to react the functionality to be derivatized prior to the formation of the macrocyclic ring. The cyclic structure can restrict access of reagents to that functionality. For example, in the synthesis of N-methyl and N-acyl derivatives of macrocycles, where the secondary nitrogen atom of the ring is the site of derivatization, the reaction is preferred to be performed prior to the application of the appropriate cyclization protocol.
In other cases, for example the derivatization of side chain functionality, the reaction was best performed after formation of the macrocyclic ring. For example, further reaction of amino moieties on side chains examples was typically efficiently done by reaction of the partially protected macrocycle. In this manner, acylation, sulfonylation, alkylation (via reductive amination), guanidine and urea formation were performed via standard methods.
Table 1, hereinbelow, shows a representative, but by no means exclusive, summary of the chemical synthesis of several representative compounds of the invention.
D. Analytical Data for Selected Compounds of the Invention
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury 300 MHz spectrometer (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.) and are referenced internally with respect to the residual proton signals of the solvent. Information about the conformation of the molecules in solution can be determined utilizing appropriate two-dimensional NMR techniques known to those skilled in the art. HPLC purifications were run on a Waters Xterra® MS C18 column, using the Waters FractionLynx® system (Waters Corporation, Milford, Mass.). Automated medium pressure chromatographic purifications were performed on an Isco CombiFlash® 16× system with disposable silica or C18 cartridges that permitted up to sixteen (16) samples to be run simultaneously (Teledyne Isco, Inc., Lincoln, Nebr.). MS spectra were recorded on a Waters Micromass®) Platform II or ZQ™ system. HRMS spectra were recorded with a VG Micromass ZAB-ZF spectrometer. Chemical and biological information were stored and analyzed utilizing the ActivityBase® database software (ID Business Solutions Ltd., Guildford, Surrey, UK).
General Methods for Analytical HPLC Analyses
HPLC analyses are performed on a Waters Alliance® system 2695 running at 1 mL/min using an Xterra MS C18 column 4.6×50 mm (3.5 μm). A Waters 996 PDA provided UV data for purity assessment (Waters Corporation, Milford, Mass.). An LCPackings (Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, Calif.) splitter (50:40:10) allowed the flow to be separated in three parts. The first part (50%) went to a Micromass® Platform II MS equipped with an APCI probe for identity confirmation. The second part (40%) went to an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD, Polymer Laboratories, now part of Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif., PL-ELS-1000™) for purity assessment and the last portion (10%) to a chemiluminescence nitrogen detector (CLND, Antek® Model 8060, Antek Instruments, Houston, Tex., part of Roper Industries, Inc., Duluth, Ga.) for quantitation and purity assessment. Data was captured and processed utilizing the most recent version of the Waters Millenium® software package (Milford, Mass.).
An example LC method suitable for compounds of the present invention uses MeOH as solvent A, H2O as solvent B and 1% TFA/H2O as solvent D. Initial mobile-phase composition is 5% A, 85% B and 10% D. Details of the standard gradient method are shown below:
Compounds 2-6, 8-10, 56, 65 and 144 are as defined in Table (3), hereinbelow.
Compound 2
Yield: 12 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.83 (m, 1H); 8.53 (m, 1H); 7.63 (m, 1H); 7.4-7.08 (m, 7H); 7.00-6.84 (m, 2H); 6.60 (d, 15 Hz, 1H); 6.41 (dt, 15 Hz, 5.4 Hz, 1H); 4.35 (m, 1H); 4.25-4.05 (m, 3H); 3.94 (dt, 1H, 6 Hz, 15 Hz); 3.79 (dd, 1H, 3.6 Hz, 8.4 Hz); 3.60 (m, 1H); 3.52-3.40 (bd, 1H); 3.22-3.06 (m, 4H); 1.88 (m, 2H); 1.54-1.28 (m, 2H); 1.25 (d, 3H, 4.8 Hz); 1.22 (d, 3H, 2.7 Hz); 0.92-0.80 (m, 6H).
HRMS calc. for C30H40N4O4: 520.3049; found 520.3057±0.0016
HPLC [standard gradient method (refers to that presented in General Methods for Analytical HPLC Analyses)] tR=9.55 min.
Compound 4
Yield: 12 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.35 (b, 1H); 8.98 (b, 1H); 5.52 (d, 1H, 8.4 Hz); 8.38 (b, 1H); 7.25 (b, 1H); 7.13-7.07 (m, 4H); 6.86 (t, 2H, 7.5 Hz); 6.57 (d, 2H, 8.7 Hz); 4.33 (b, 1H); 4.21-4.02 (m, 3H); 3.78 (dd, 1H, 3.3 Hz; 8.1 Hz); 3.65-3.54 (m, 1H); 3.31-3.23 (m, 1H); 3.13-3.02 (m, 4H); 2.78-2.2.28-2.18 (m, 1H); 2.0-1.80 (m, 2H); 1.50-1.30 (m, 3H); 1.25 (d, 3H, 4.5 Hz); 1.22 (d, 3H, 4.5 Hz); 1.01 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz); 0.90 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz); (t, 3H, 7.5 Hz).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.22; 171.37; 157.77; 157.44; 156.04; 131.76; 130.80; 130.70; 127.88; 121.82; 115.83; 111.71; 62.13; 60.62; 54.21; 52.81; 47.13; 42.47; 33.31; 29.69; 29.30; 28.61; 20.36; 19.44; 18.72; 17.60; 13.97.
HRMS calc. for C30H42N4O5: 538.3155; found: 538.3145±0.0016
HPLC (standard gradient) tR=8.12 min.
Compound 5
Yield: 17 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.02 (b, 1H); 8.47 (d, 1H, 8.4 Hz); 7.7 (b, 1H); 7.58 (d, 1H, 5.4 Hz); 7.28 (dd, 1H, 7.8 Hz, 0.8 Hz); 7.20 (t, 1H, 9.0 Hz, 0.8 Hz); 7.14 (d, 2H, 8.4 Hz); 6.98-6.91 (m, 3H); 6.66 (d, 8.7 Hz); 6.63 (d, 1H, 15.0 Hz); 6.43 (dt, 1H, 6.0 Hz, 15.0 Hz); 4.28-3.86 (m, 6H); 3.60-3.40 (m, 2H); 3.22-3.12 (m, 1HO; 3.05 (d, 2H, 5.4 Hz); 1.92-1.80 (m, 1H); 1.56-1.40 (m, 1H); 1.36-1.20 (m, 2H); 1.25 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz); 0.84 (t, 3H, 7.2 Hz).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.54; 171.86; 158.97; 158.56; 127.39; 155.84; 131.62; 129.73; 129.20; 129.02; 128.43; 126.30; 124.51; 122.01; 115.85; 112.88; 61.23; 52.90; 51.23; 47.08; 42.66; 36.13; 33.30; 21.14; 19.57; 17.07; 14.14; 11.49.
HRMS calc. for C28H36N4O5: 508.2685; found: 508.2681±0.0015
HPLC (standard gradient) tR=7.67 min.
Compound 6
Yield: 16 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.37 (b, 1H); 8.87 (b, 1H); 8.61 (d, 1H, 8.7 Hz); 7.62 (b, 1H); 7.27 (d, 1H, 7.8 Hz); 7.21 (t, 1H, 8.4 Hz); 7.14 (d, 2H, 8.4 Hz); 6.98-6.87 (m, 3H); 6.64 (d, 2H, 8.1 Hz); 6.70 (d, 1H, 15.6 Hz); 6.39 (dt, 1H, 6.3 Hz, 15.6 Hz); 4.44-4.36 (m, 1H); 4.34-4.08 (m, 2 Hz); 4.45-3.92 (dt, 1H, 6.9 Hz, 15.6 Hz); 3.74 (dd, 1H, 3.6 Hz, 8.4 Hz); 3.54-3.26 (m, 3H); 3.22-3.02 (m, 3H); 2.60-2.36 (m, 4H); 2.24-2.14 (m, 1H); 2.02 (s, 3H); 1.96-1.89 (m, 1H); 1.80-1.66 (m, 1H); 1.01 (d, 3H, 6.3 Hz); 0.90 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.51; 171.26; 158.90; 158.49; 157.38; 155.86; 131.63; 129.82; 129.21; 128.86; 128.63; 126.21; 121.98; 115.83; 112.83; 62.11; 61.06; 51.97; 47.10; 42.78; 30.91; 30.67; 29.34; 20.37; 19.39; 15.06.
HRMS calc. for C30H40N4O5S: 568.2719; found: 568.2711±0.0017
HPLC Rt (general method) 7.92 min.
Compound 8
Yield: 27 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.05 (b, 1H); 8.43 (b, 1H); 8.34 (d, 1H, 9.3 Hz); 7.40 (b, 1H); 6.97 (d, 1H, 7.5 Hz); 6.92-6.74 (m, 9H); 6.67-6.54 (m, 2H); 6.33-6.25 (m, 3H); 6.10 (dt, 1H, 5.7 Hz, 16.2 Hz); 4.22 (dt, 1H, 0.9 Hz, 12 Hz); 3.94-6.66 (m, 4H); 3.30 (dd, 1H, 3.6 Hz, 7.8 Hz); 3.24 (m, 1H); 3.18 (m, 1H); 2.85-2.68 (m, 3H); 2.44-2.23 (m, 2H); 1.32 (o, 1H, 7.5 Hz); 0.97-0.89 (m, 1H); 0.42 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz); 0.01 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.20; 157.35; 155.88; 139.12; 131.61; 130.87; 129.74; 129.21; 128.77; 128.88; 126.85; 126.19; 121.97; 115.82; 112.84; 62.04; 61.10; 55.07; 50.01; 47.09; 42.85; 37.42; 29.11.
HRMS calc. For C34H42N4O5: 586.3155; found: 586.3145±0.0017
HPLC Rt (general method) 9.34 min.
Compound 9
Yield: 17 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.39 (b, 1H); 8.83 (b, 1H); 8.29 (d, 1H, 9.3 Hz); 7.62 (b, 1H); 7.28 (d, 1H, 6.6 Hz); 7.20 (t, 1H, 6.9 Hz); 7.12 (d, 2H, 7.8 Hz); 6.98-6.91 (m, 2H); 6.63 (d, 2H, 8.4 Hz); 6.58 (d, 1H, 16.2 Hz); 6.40 (dt, 1H, 5.7 Hz, 16.2 Hz); 4.29-4.13 (m, 3H); 4.03-3.92 (m, 2H); 3.52 (m, 1H); 3.15-3.05 (m, 3H); 2.45-2.37 (m, 1H);
1.96-1.88 (m, 1H); 1.25 (dd, 2H, 4.5 Hz; 6 Hz); 1.01 (d, 3H, 6.3 Hz); 0.91 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz); 0.86 (d, 3H, 7.2 Hz); 0.81 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.85; 171.17; 157.37; 155.87; 131.59; 129.88; 129.18; 128.97; 128.78; 128.51; 126.16; 121.97; 115.83; 112.85; 61.55; 61.18; 58.15; 54.22; 47.08; 42.89; 36.32; 29.35; 29.00; 20.34; 19.56; 18.73; 17.44.
HRMS calc. for C30H40N4O5 536.2998; found: 536.2990±0.0017.
HPLC (standard gradient) tR=8.15 min.
Compound 10
Yield: 24 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.33 (b, 1H); 8.82 (b, 1H); 8.56 (d, 1H, 8.3 Hz); 7.60 (b, 1H); 7.27 (d, 2H, 7.8 Hz); 7.20 (t, 1H, 7.8 Hz); 7.13 (d, 2H, 8.4 Hz); 6.95 (t, 2H, 7.8 Hz); 6.64 (d, 2H, 8.4 Hz); 6.57 (d, 1H, 15.4 Hz); 6.38 (dt, 1H, 15.4 Hz, 5.8 Hz); 4.26-4.10 (m, 3H); 3.96 (dt, 1H, 5.4 Hz, 8.4 Hz); 3.77 (dd, 1H, 3.7 Hz, 7.8 Hz); 3.51-3.24 (m, 3H); 3.18-3.02 (m, 3H); 1.90 (h, 1H, 6.4 Hz); 1.73-1.54 (m, 2H); 1.45 (dt, 1H, 6.7 Hz, 0.9 Hz); 0.99 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz); 0.89 (d, 3H, 6.3 Hz); 0.87 (d, 3H, 6.0 Hz); 0.80 (d, 3H, 6.3 Hz).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.23; 171.17; 157.37; 155.88; 131.62; 129.82; 129.19; 128.95; 128.59; 126.24; 121.99; 115.84; 112.88; 64.23; 61.98; 61.14; 51.43; 61.14; 51.43; 47.07; 42.81; 29.38; 24.85; 24.11; 21.00; 20.32; 19.30.
HRMS calc. for C31H42N4O5 550.3155; found: 550.3150±0.0016.
HPLC (standard gradient) tR=8.91 min.
Compound 56
Yield: 16 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.39 (b, 1H); 8.90 (b, 1H); 8.67 (d, 1H, 8.4 Hz); 7.74 (b, 4H); 7.29-7.08 (m, 4H); 6.99-6.87 (m, 2H); 6.64 (d, 2H, 8.1 Hz); 6.61 (d, 1H, 16.5 Hz); 6.40 (dt, 1H, 5.7 Hz, 16.5 Hz); 4.40-4.06 (m, 4H); 4.02-3.95 (m, 1H); 3.79 (dd, 1H, 3.6 Hz, 7.8 Hz); 3.55-3.30 (m, 2H); 3.16-3.05 (m, 3H); 2.82-2.69 (m, 2H); 2.02-1.85 (m, 2H); 1.64-1.43 (m, 3H); 1.29-1.23 (m, 1H); 1.01 (d, 3H, 6.3 Hz); 0.91 (d, 3H, 6.3 Hz); 0.86-0.84 (m, 2H).
HPLC (standard gradient) tR=5.71 min.
Compound 65
Yield: 17 mg pure macrocycle was obtained (CLND quantification).
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.60 (b, 1H); 9.39 (b, 1H); 8.88 (b, 1H); 8.70 (d, 1H, 7.5 Hz); 8.57 (d, 1H, 4.2 Hz); 7.27 (t, 6 Hz); 6.96 (d, 2H, 8.4 Hz); 6.66 (d, 2H, 8.4 Hz); 5.78-5.68 (m, 1H); 5.42-5.33 (m, 1H); 3.96-3.89 (m, 1H); 3.80-3.57 (m, 5H); 3.41-3.34 (m, 1H); 3.10-2.90 (m, 1H); 2.78-2.66 (m, 1H); 2.21-2.10 (m, 1H); 2.06-1.93 (m, 1H); 1.70-1.60 (m, 1H); 1.52-1.41 (m, 1H); 1.39-1.26 (m, 1H); 1.25 (d, 3H, 4.8 Hz); 1.23 (d, 3H, 4.5 Hz); 0.83 (dd, 3H, 3 Hz, 4.5 Hz).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.68; 172.63; 159.15; 158.73; 157.38; 157.25; 130.89; 124.99; 116.03; 62.51; 62.12; 54.29; 49.27; 42.47; 32.77; 30.43; 28.85; 20.46; 19.59; 18.72; 17.39; 13.90; 13.09.
HRMS calc. for C24H36N4O4: 444.2736; found: 444.2726±0.0013
HPLC (standard gradient) tR=6.80 min.
Compound 144
1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.4 (m, 1H); 7.27 (dt, 1H, 1.5 Hz, 6.6 Hz); 7.22-7.14 (m, 2H); 7.08-6.98 (m, 2H); 6.78 9t, 2H, 6.6 Hz); 4.45-4.39 (m, 2H); 4.15 (d, 2H, 8.1 Hz); 7.74 (d, 1H, 9.3 Hz); 3.54 (d, 1H, 10.8 Hz); 3.35-3.22 (m, 2H); 3.20 (q, 1H, 1.5 Hz); 2.82-2.71 (m, 1H); 2.61-2.55 (m, 1H); 2.21-2.11 (m, 1h); 2.02-1.94 (m, 1H); 1.74-1.40 (m, 5H); 1.04 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz); 0.93 (d, 3H, 6.6 Hz); 0.74-0.64 9m, 1H); 0.45-0.28 (m, 2H); 0.15-0.08 (m, 1H); 0.06-0.02 (m, 1H).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CD3OD) δ 173.29; 172.14; 167.51; 155.47; 134.86; 134.81; 130.38; 130.31; 128.81; 128.25; 127.44; 121.63; 110.39; 107.71; 105.02; 67.10; 66.66; 62.81; 62.06; 60.10; 53.99; 41.44; 36.07; 31.91; 30.01; 29.18; 28.94; 27.79; 23.68; 23.15; 19.08; 18.25; 8.17; 4.98; 3.16.
HRMS: calc. for C31H41N4O4C1568.2816; found 568.2802±0.0017
F. Mass Spectral Data for Selected Compounds of the Invention
Biological Methods and Results
The compounds of the present invention were evaluated for their ability to interact at the human motilin receptor utilizing a competitive radioligand binding assay as described in Method B1. Further characterization of the interaction can be performed utilizing the functional assays described in Methods B2, B3 and B4. Some of these methods can be conducted, if so desired, in a high throughput manner to permit the simultaneous evaluation of many compounds. Other assays have also been described that are suitable for HTS, such as that based upon the stable expression of a synthetic gene for the human motilin receptor.
Results for the examination of representative compounds of the present invention using Method B1 are presented in Table 3. The binding activity is listed as ranges with the following levels: A=0.001-0.10 μM; B=0.10-1.0 μM; C=1.0-10.0 μM. In addition, the assay results of two additional compounds using this Method are shown below. As can be observed, this demonstrates the activity of a representative bicyclic compound of Formula IV of the invention, which resulted from incorporation of D-proline as the second recognition building block. Significantly, the lack of binding activity obtained with compound 121, which is the linear analogue of compound 1 (Ki=level B), illustrates the critical importance of the cyclic structure to attaining the desired interaction.
Competitive binding curves for two representative compounds of the invention (Compounds 8 and 11) are presented in
For determination of functional significance of the binding, the compounds are preferably tested in the Aequorin assay as described in Method B2, although the procedure of Method B3 is also applicable. As can be seen from the data presented in Table 4, the representative compounds examined act as antagonists at the motilin receptor and are devoid of agonist activity at the concentrations studied. The functional activity is listed as ranges with the following levels: A=0.001-0.10 μM; B=0.10-1.0 μM. The higher sensitivity of the assay of Method B2, almost 100 times that of Method C, makes it the preferred one for this assessment. This is evident in the EC50 values obtained in each for the positive agonist standard, motilin. Additionally, Method B2 measures, the actual signaling event, which makes it more relevant to the effect that is desired, whereas the assay of Method B3 simply measures GTP turnover.
1Activity is listed as ranges with the following levels: A = 0.001-0.10 μM; B = 0.10-1.0 μM
2Human and porcine motilin are the same peptide.
In addition, a common and scientifically-accepted ex vivo assay for the measurement of agonist or antagonist activity at the motilin receptor is the contraction of rabbit duodenum or other gastrointestinal smooth muscle tissue.A2-A4 Agonists are defined as compounds that induce >50% contraction relative to the motilin peptide, whereas antagonists are defined as compounds that cause >50% inhibition of the response to motilin. Compounds of the present invention have shown significant antagonist activity in this assay. For example, compound 144 exhibited a pA2=6.95, while compound 165 had a pA2=7.17, as calculated from the Schild plots of the response obtained at various concentrations as described in Method B4.
Gastric motility is generally measured in the clinical setting as the time required for gastric emptying and subsequent transit time through the GI tract. Gastric emptying scans are well known to those skilled in the art an, briefly, comprise use of an oral contrast agent, such as barium, or a radiolabeled meal. Solid and liquids can be measured independently. A test food or liquid is radiolabeled with an isotope (99mTc) and after ingestion or administration, transit time through the GI tract and gastric emptying are measured by visualization using gamma cameras. These studies are performed before and after the administration of the therapeutic agent to quantify the efficacy of the compound.
Materials:
Final Test Concentrations (N=11) for Compounds:
Compounds were provided frozen on dry ice at a stock concentration of 10 mM diluted in 100% DMSO and stored at −20° C. until the day of testing. On the test day, compounds were allowed to thaw at room temperature and than diluted in assay buffer according to the desired test concentrations. Under these conditions, the maximum final DMSO concentration in the assay was 0.5%.
Assay Protocol:
In deep-well plates, diluted cell membranes (1.5 μg/mL) are combined with 10 μL of either binding buffer (total binding, N=5), 1 μM motilin (non-specific binding, N=3) or the appropriate concentration of test compound. The reaction is initiated by addition of 10 μl of [125I]-motilin (final conc. 0.04-0.06 nM) to each well. Plates are sealed with TopSeal-A, vortexed gently and incubated at room temperature for 2 hours. The reaction is arrested by filtering samples through pre-soaked (0.3% polyethyleneimine, 2 h) Multiscreen Harvest plates using a Tomtec® Harvester (Tomtec, Hamden, Conn.)), washed 9 times with 500 μL of cold 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and than plates are air-dried in a fumehood for 30 minutes. A bottom seal is applied to the plates prior to the addition of 25 μL of MicroScint-0™ to each well. Plates are then sealed with TopSeal-A® and counted for 30 sec per well on a TopCount® Microplate Scintillation and Luminescence Counter (PerkinElmer, Wellesley, Mass.) where results are expressed as counts per minute (cpm).
Data are analyzed by GraphPad™ Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.) using a variable slope non-linear regression analysis. Ki values were calculated using a Kd value of 0.16 nM for [125I]-motilin (previously determined during membrane characterization).
where total and non-specific binding represent the cpm obtained in the absence or presence of 1 μM motilin, respectively.
Materials:
Compounds were provided as dry films at a quantity of approximately 1.2 μmol in pre-formatted 96-well plates. Compounds were dissolved in 100% DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM and stored at −20° C. until further use. Daughter plates were prepared at a concentration of 500 μM in 30% DMSO with 0.1% BSA and stored at −20° C. until testing. On the test day, compounds were allowed to thaw at room temperature and than diluted in assay buffer according to the desired test concentrations. Under these conditions, the maximum final DMSO concentration in the assay was 0.6%.
Cell Preparation:
Cells are collected from culture plates with Ca2+ and Mg2+-free phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 5 mM EDTA, pelleted for 2 minutes at 1000×g, resuspended in assay buffer (see above) at a density of 5×106 cells/mL and incubated overnight in the presence of 5 μM coelenterazine. After loading, cells were diluted with assay buffer to a concentration of 5×105 cells/mL.
Assay Protocol:
For agonist testing, 50 μl of the cell suspension was mixed with 50 μl of the appropriate concentration of test compound or motilin (reference agonist) in 96-well plates (duplicate samples). The emission of light resulting from receptor activation was recorded using the Functional Drug Screening System 6000 ‘FDSS 6000’ (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Japan).
For antagonist testing, an approximate EC80 concentration of motilin (i.e. 0.5 nM; 100 μL) was injected onto the cell suspension containing the test compounds (duplicate samples) 15-30 minutes after the end of agonist testing and the consequent emission of light resulting from receptor activation was measured as described in the paragraph above.
Results are expressed as Relative Light Units (RLU). Concentration response curves were analyzed using GraphPad™ Prism® (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.) by non-linear regression analysis (sigmoidal dose-response) based on the equation E=Emax/(1+EC50/C)n where E is the measured RLU value at a given agonist concentration (C), Emax is the maximal response, EC50 is the concentration producing 50% stimulation and n is the slope index. For agonist testing, results for each concentration of test compound were expressed as percent activation relative to the signal induced by motilin at a concentration equal to the EC80 (i.e. 0.5 nM). For antagonist testing, results for each concentration of test compound were expressed as percent inhibition relative to the signal induced by motilin at a concentration equal to the EC80 (i.e. 0.5 nM).
Materials:
Compounds were provided frozen on dry ice at a stock concentration of 10 mM diluted in 100% DMSO and stored at −20° C. until the day of testing. On the test day, compounds were allowed to thaw at room temperature and than diluted in assay buffer according to the desired test concentrations. Under these conditions, the maximum final DMSO concentration in the assay was 0.5%.
Assay Protocol:
CHO membranes were immobilized into 96-well FlashPlate® microplates. Test compound, GTPγS, motilin and [35S]-GTPγS were combined in each well according to the Assay Volumes described above.
For the assay to measure agonist activity, an additional 25 μl of buffer was added to each well in addition to 25 μL of either buffer (basal value, N=4), 1 μM (final conc.) motilin (Emax value, N=3), 25 μM (final conc.) GTPγS (non-specific value, N=4), or the appropriate concentration of test compound (N=3).
For the assay to measure antagonist activity, an additional 25 μL of either buffer (unstimulated control) or motilin (0.1 μM final conc.) is added to each well, in addition to either 25 μL of buffer (basal value, N=3), 1 μM (final conc.) motilin (Emax value, N=3), 25 μM (final conc.) GTPγS (non-specific value, N=4), or the appropriate concentration of test compound (N=3).
The reaction is initiated by addition of 100 mL of [35S]-GTPγS to each well. Each plate is sealed (TopSeal-A™) and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 150 min. Then, plates are counted for 30 seconds per well on the TopCount® NXT.
Data were analyzed by GraphPad™ Prism® 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.) using non-linear regression analysis (sigmoidal dose-response) for the calculation of IC50/EC50 values.
Where Top and Bottom correspond to the top and bottom values of the dose-response curve calculated by GraphPad™ Prism®).
Duodenal segments were vertically suspended in organ chambers of 10 mL filled with Krebs buffer and connected to an isotonic force transducer, with a preload of 1 g. After a stabilization period, the muscle strips were challenged with 10−4 M acetylcholine and washed. This was repeated until a stable maximal contraction was obtained (2-3 times), with an interval of at least 20 minutes.
After a stable base line was reached, test compounds were added to the bath. After 15 min incubation, a dose response to motilin was recorded by adding logarithmically increasing concentrations of motilin to the bath (final concentration 10−9 to 10−6 M). A blank experiment (no test compound present) was also performed. At the end of the dose response curve, a supramaximal dose of acetylcholine (10−4 M) was given and this response was used as a reference (100% contraction).
The results of experiments at different concentrations of test compound were combined and analyzed to derive the pA2 value from the Schild plot.
It is appreciated that although specific experimental methods have been described herein for the purposes of illustration, various modifications to these experimental methods as well as alternate methods of experimentation may be used without departing from the scope of this invention.
X is NH except for:
Compound 223 and 225, X is:
Compound 224, X is NMe
Compound 226, X is:
Compound 227, X is
Z1, Z2 and Z3 are NH except for compounds 30, 173 and 174 and where Z1 is O and compound 111 where Z2 is O.
R2, R4 and R5 are hydrogen except for compound 85 where it is
m, n1 and p are zero.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CA04/00913 | Jun 2004 | CA | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4920102 | Gidda et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4997820 | Sutter et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5008249 | Omura et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5143915 | Rovnyak et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5175150 | Omura et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5179087 | Donald et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5196452 | Hwang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5252579 | Skotnicki et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5292741 | Delaszlo et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5376663 | Cooper et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5380888 | Sum et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5418224 | Hoeltje et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5422341 | Macielag et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5426103 | Macpherson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5432261 | Kurono et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5457111 | Luly et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5457194 | Luly et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459049 | Kurono et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5470830 | Macielag et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470961 | Harada et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5523401 | Freiberg et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530119 | Kawai et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530120 | Luly et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534632 | Or et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538961 | Freiberg et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5554605 | Freiberg et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561137 | Or et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5561139 | Luly et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5561140 | Kawai et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5561228 | Or et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563172 | Wagner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5599927 | Or et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604234 | Or et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604294 | Luly et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5612350 | Or et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5624949 | Heath, Jr. et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5643918 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658888 | Koga et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5696108 | Heath, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5698578 | Heath, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5708002 | Luly et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710145 | Engel et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5712253 | Lartey et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719175 | Heath, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5731320 | Wagner et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734012 | Dharanipragada et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5811515 | Grubbs et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5817807 | Bridger et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5849691 | Majer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854407 | Harada et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5888971 | Greco et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5912235 | Hoeltje et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5952320 | Davidsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969132 | Farr et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972939 | Chen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6043357 | Abbenante et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6080838 | Etzkorn et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6100239 | Ataka et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6100377 | Greene | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6121257 | Kawai et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124453 | Fehr et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6165985 | Jasserand et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6228986 | Lanter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6255285 | Kotake et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6281352 | Xue et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6307044 | Dorow et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6329376 | Bergman | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6348447 | Hellstrom et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6350755 | Desolms et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6358985 | Anthony et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6380228 | Stump et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384031 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6392040 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6403775 | McDaniel | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6410534 | Dinsmore et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413964 | Desolms et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423714 | Chen et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6441017 | Bell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6511980 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6534506 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6548501 | Hakkinen | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6562823 | Dinsmore et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6562963 | Dorow et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6566385 | Desolms et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6586630 | Matsuoka et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6608027 | Tsantrizos et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610722 | Stump et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6624165 | Chen et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6632818 | Dinsmore | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6660832 | Jefferson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6667309 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6720433 | Matsuoka et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 20010041701 | Chen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056106 | Chen et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002192 | Chen | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013352 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016294 | Venkatraman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049217 | Desolms et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058286 | Danishefsky et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058817 | Danishefsky et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091151 | Danishefsky et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103238 | Chen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111484 | Chen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020192773 | Walsh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030158377 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176643 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181363 | Llinas-Brunet | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191053 | Matsuoka et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203906 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211982 | Saragovi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224977 | Llinas-Bruunet et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236199 | Pulley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236240 | Pulley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002448 | Tsantrizos et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038872 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040063640 | Burg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20050049234 | Deslongchamps et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119169 | Deslongchamps et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137127 | Deslongchamps et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO-9521186 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO-9846631 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO-9851665 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO-0017231 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO-0044770 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO-0105811 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO-0114346 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO-0116162 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO-0125257 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO-0142228 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO-0153331 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO-0177113 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO-0181325 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO-0216369 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO-0240463 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO-02051413 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO-02064623 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO-02070547 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO-02092592 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO-0220510 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO-03024996 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO-03053349 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO-03054000 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO-03064455 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO-03068168 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO-03076424 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO-02102400 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO-03106480 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004000742 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004007483 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004012816 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004018503 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004026881 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050054562 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60479223 | Jun 2003 | US |
