Not Applicable
Not Applicable
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to electronic article surveillance systems, and more particularly to a transceiver antenna having a core made of an amorphous magnetic material for electronic article surveillance marker detection.
2. Description of the Related Art
Electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems are typically used to protect assets including reducing theft of retail articles. In operation, an EAS interrogation zone is established around the perimeter of a protected area such as the exits of a retail store. EAS markers, which are detectable within the interrogation zone, are attached to each asset or article to be protected. The interrogation zone is established by EAS antennas positioned for example, in the vicinity of the store's exit. The EAS antennas transmit an electromagnetic interrogation field, which causes a response from an active EAS marker in the interrogation zone. The EAS antennas receive and the EAS electronics detect the EAS marker's response, which indicates an article, with an attached EAS marker, is in the interrogation zone. EAS markers are removed, or the markers deactivated, for articles purchased or otherwise authorized for removal from the store or protected area. Hence, an EAS marker detected within the interrogation zone indicates that an article is attempting to be removed from the protected area, or store, without authorization, and appropriate action can be taken.
The EAS antennas, which are typically made of air core coils of wire, may be configured as separate transmit and receive antennas, or as transceiver antennas. These conventional EAS air-core antennas must generate interrogation zones that are sufficient to cover stores that have very wide exits, and are relatively large. In food and other stores, having narrow aisles the smallest antennas possible are desired. In these narrow aisle environments EAS antennas must operate near metal surfaces and check-stands, which can result in degraded performance. Expensive, large, and heavy shielding is required for conventional air-core EAS antennas for effective operation in this environment. There exists a need for smaller EAS antennas that perform satisfactorily, especially in tight spaces and near metal surfaces.
The use of ferrite core EAS receive antennas is well known. Ferrite material is a powder, which is blended, compressed into a particular shape, and then sintered in a very high temperature oven. It is a compound that becomes a fully crystalline structure after sintering. Ferrite has a higher magnetic permeability than air effectively increasing the detection performance of a ferrite core antenna. A ferrite core receiver antenna sold by Sensormatic uses a manganese zinc ferrite rod about 19 cm long and 0.6 cm in diameter with magnet wire wound about the surface. However, in certain EAS frequency bands of interest and at required levels of excitation field, ferrite cores may saturate before producing an interrogation field suitable for detecting EAS markers at a useable distance.
The use of amorphous magnetic material core antennas is known for certain receiver applications. U.S. Pat. No. 5,220,339, to Matsushita, discloses a receiver antenna having an amorphous core for UHF and VHF television frequency reception. The '339 patent discloses two magnetic core geometries. The first core geometry is a solid cylindrical shape made of amorphous fibers. The second core geometry is a hollow cylindrical shape made of an amorphous sheet spiral rolled to form a hollow cylinder. A conductive insulated winding surrounds each core. The magnetic permeability of amorphous metal is significantly higher than ferrite, indicating improved reception performance in comparison to a ferrite core at certain frequencies. The '339 patent provides no useable information or teaching directed toward transmitting using an amorphous core antenna.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,567,537, to Yoshizawa et al., discloses a passive transponder antenna using a magnetic core for identification systems applications. A remote transmitter field source produces an induced voltage on the transponder antenna that energizes the transponder transmitting/receiving device, which then transmits a digital code to a remote receiver antenna. The transponder core antenna uses a very thin magnetic core and is not directly coupled to the electronics that powers the remote transmitter and receiver antennas. The magnetic core element, which can be an amorphous alloy, is 25 microns thick or less. A thickness greater than 25 microns is not suitable due to decreased Q and lower sensitivity. The lower the thickness, the better the performance, and, as stated in the '537 patent at column 5, lines 1-6, 15 microns thickness is better than 25 microns. The thickness of the laminated core antenna, which is made up of a plurality of core elements, is disclosed to be 3 mm or less. The target frequency for the identification system is 134 kHz. The preferred Q value is greater than 25 or 35, or even more, at the 134 kHz frequency. The power levels operating the passive transponder are quite low, and the level of magnetic field transmitted by such a device is extremely low.
The present invention is an electronic article surveillance antenna for generating an electromagnetic field to interrogate and detect electronic article surveillance markers. Including a core formed by a plurality of amorphous alloy ribbons insulated from each other and stacked to form a substantially elongated solid rectangular shape. A coil winding of wire disposed around at least a portion of the core, the coil winding of wire insulated from the core, the core and the coil winding being of a minimum size for generation of an electromagnetic field for interrogation and detection of electronic article surveillance markers.
In one embodiment the antenna has a core about 75 centimeters long and about 2 centimeters wide made with about 60 amorphous alloy ribbons, each amorphous alloy ribbon is about 23 microns thick stacked and laminated together to form the core. The coil winding of wire can be 24-gauge wire with about 90 turns around the core.
In an alternate embodiment the antenna includes a central core member about 50 centimeters long and about 2 centimeters wide made of about 25 amorphous alloy ribbons, each amorphous alloy ribbon about 23 microns thick stacked and laminated together forming the central core member. A first outer member and a second outer member are disposed on opposite sides of the central member. Each of the first second outer members are about 30 centimeters long and 2 centimeters wide made of about 15 amorphous alloy ribbons, each amorphous alloy ribbon about 23 microns thick stacked and laminated together forming the first and second outer layer, respectively. The central core member and the first and second outer members together form the core.
One embodiment for an electronic controller is connected to said coil winding or wire and includes a transmitter for generating an electromagnetic field for transmission into an interrogation zone for reception by an electronic article surveillance marker, the electronic article surveillance marker responding with a characteristic response signal. And, a receiver for detecting the characteristic response signal from the electronic article surveillance marker, and a switching controller for switching the coil winding of wire between the transmitter and the receiver. The electronic controller can operate in a pulsed mode where the switching controller sequentially switches between the transmitter and the receiver in preselected time periods.
Objectives, advantages, and applications of the present invention will be made apparent by the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention.
Referring to
Referring to
The magnetic properties and geometry of the core 4 used in the core transceiver antenna 2 are optimized to perform the dual role of transmitter and receiver antenna. It is important that the core doesn't saturate during the excitation pulse. It is also important for the receiver antenna sensitivity to be optimized by achieving the maximum effective permeability at low magnetic field levels. There are several compromising situations arising in the dual role of the transceiver core antenna. To prevent saturation, the core volume needs to be a minimum size. For a fixed length, this is achieved by increasing the width of the material or the number of ribbons in the stack. For the receiver antenna sensitivity to be optimized, the effective permeability must be maximized. This means that for a given core length, the cross-sectional area (product of width and overall thickness) must be minimized to a sufficient degree. An acceptable compromise between these competing parameters can occur for a core geometry consisting of a length of about 75 cm. and a cross-sectional area of about 0.276 cm.2, as illustrated in
Referring to
The quality factor Q if the amorphous core transceiver antennas is defined as follows,
where f is the operating frequency, L the inductance, and R the resistance. Q plays an important role in both transmit and receive modes of the antenna. Generally, a higher value of Q enhances detection sensitivity, but due to the transmit function using the same core, the value of Q is typically limited to 20 or less. Limiting Q to 20 or less prevents ringing of the transmitter signal into the nearby receiver window (as fully explained hereinbelow), causing false detections. Referring back to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It is to be understood that variations and modifications of the present invention can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the present invention contemplates complex core configurations, other than the two examples provided herein, which may enhance core performance, as well as other frequency bands of operation. It is also to be understood that the scope of the invention is not to be interpreted as limited to the specific embodiments disclosed herein, but only in accordance with the appended claims when read in light of the forgoing disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3665449 | Elder et al. | May 1972 | A |
3765007 | Elder | Oct 1973 | A |
4658263 | Urbanski | Apr 1987 | A |
4922261 | O'Farrell | May 1990 | A |
5220338 | Matsushita | Jun 1993 | A |
5220339 | Matsushita | Jun 1993 | A |
5327118 | Drucker et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345222 | Davies et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5371490 | Martinides | Dec 1994 | A |
5396698 | Orthmann et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5453747 | D'Hont et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459451 | Crossfield et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5499017 | Beigel | Mar 1996 | A |
5561430 | Knebelkamp | Oct 1996 | A |
5567537 | Yoshizawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5625366 | D'Hont | Apr 1997 | A |
5638080 | Orthmann et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5729200 | Copeland et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6014111 | Johannessen | Jan 2000 | A |
6060988 | Copeland et al. | May 2000 | A |
6118378 | Balch et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6172608 | Cole | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181245 | Copeland et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6268723 | Hash et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6304182 | Mori et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307517 | Lee | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6351215 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0762535 | Nov 1998 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030117282 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |