Patent Grant
7591428
The present invention relates generally to the field of currency processing systems and, more particularly, to a magnetic detection system for use in the processing of currency bills having magnetic attributes.
Typical bill authentication devices which utilize the magnetic hysteresis properties of the material of a secured document—such as currency—employ at least one static magnetic field. Other bill authentication devices employ two static magnetic fields of the same or opposite polarities. The use of two magnetic fields allows for a measure of both the saturation magnetization and the non-saturated magnetization. Where fields of opposite polarities are employed, the choice of the reverse polarity field is such that not only the magnitude of the output is changed, but the polarity (phase) is also changed. In typical bill authentication devices, permanent magnets are used to create one or two static magnetic fields.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a currency processing device having an input receptacle adapted to receive a stack of bills to be processed and a transport mechanism adapted to transport bills, one at a time, from the input receptacle along a transport path to at least one output receptacle is disclosed. The device comprises a denominating sensor disposed along the transport path adapted to obtain denominating information from each of the bills. The device further comprises a memory adapted to store master denominating information and master authentication information. The device further comprises a first magnetic scanhead disposed along the transport path downstream from the denominating sensor, the first magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills. The device further comprises a second magnetic scanhead disposed along the transport path downstream from the first magnetic scanhead, the second magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a second magnetic field of variable intensity, the second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the first magnetic field. The device further comprises a controller being adapted to receive the denominating information from the denominating sensor, the controller being adapted to determine the denomination of each of the bills when the obtained denominating information favorably compares to the stored master denominating information, the controller being adapted to adjust the second magnetic field intensity based on the determined denomination of each of the bills.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a currency processing device having an input receptacle adapted to receive a stack of bills to be processed and a transport mechanism adapted to transport bills, one at a time, from the input receptacle along a transport path to at least one output receptacle is disclosed. The currency processing device comprises a denomination determining unit. The currency processing device further comprises a first magnetic scanhead disposed along the transport path, the first magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills, the first magnetic scanhead including a first sensor for measuring the flux of each of the bills in response to the first magnetic field. The currency processing device further comprises a second magnetic scanhead disposed along the transport path downstream from the first magnetic scanhead, the second magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a second magnetic field of variable intensity, the second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the first magnetic field, the second magnetic scanhead including a second sensor for measuring the flux of each of the bills in response to the second magnetic field, the second magnetic scanhead being adjustable to vary the intensity of the magnetic field. The currency processing device further comprises a memory adapted to store master field strength information and master authentication information. The currency processing device further comprises a controller being adapted to determine the required field strength of the second magnetic field by comparing the determined denomination to the master field strength information, the controller being adapted to adjust the second magnetic field intensity based on the required field strength determination, the controller is adapted to determine a flux ratio of the first magnetic flux measurement to the second magnetic flux measurement, the controller being adapted to compare the determined flux ratio for each bill to the stored master authentication information.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method for determining the authenticity of currency bills with a currency processing device, the currency processing device adapted to determine the denomination of each of the currency bills is disclosed. The method comprises transporting each of the currency bills past a first magnetic scanhead and a second magnetic scanhead located downstream from the first magnetic scanhead, the first magnetic scanhead including a first sensor, and the second magnetic scanhead including a second sensor. The method further comprises creating a first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills. The method further comprises measuring with the first sensor the magnetic flux of the area on each of the bills in response to the first magnetic field. The method further comprises adjusting the intensity of the second magnetic field based on the denomination of each of the currency bills, the second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the first magnetic field. The method further comprises measuring with the second sensor the magnetic flux of the area on each of the bills in response to the second magnetic field. The method further comprises determining a flux ratio of the first magnetic flux measurement to the second magnetic flux measurement.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a currency processing device having an input receptacle adapted to receive a stack of bills to be processed and a transport mechanism adapted to transport bills, one at a time, from the input receptacle along a transport path to at least one output receptacle is disclosed. The currency processing device comprises a denominating sensor disposed along the transport path adapted to obtain denominating information from each of the bills. The currency processing device comprises a memory adapted to store master denominating information and master authentication information. The currency processing device comprises a first array comprising a plurality of magnetic scanheads, the first array being disposed along the transport path downstream from the denominating sensor, the plurality of scanheads being adapted to create at least one first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills. The currency processing device comprises a second array comprising a plurality of magnetic scanheads, the second array being disposed along the transport path downstream from the first magnetic scanhead, the plurality of magnetic scanheads being adapted to create at least one second magnetic field of variable intensity, the at least one second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the at least one first magnetic field. The currency processing device comprises a controller being adapted to receive the denominating characteristic information from the denominating sensor, the controller being adapted to determine the denomination of each of the bills when the obtained denominating characteristic information favorably compares to the stored master denominating characteristic information, the controller being adapted to adjust the second magnetic field intensity in each of the magnetic scanhead contained in a second array of magnetic scanheads based on the determined denomination of each of the bills and location of the magnetic area in the bill.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a magnetic detection system for authenticating a document is disclosed. The magnetic detection system comprises a first magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area of a document. The magnetic detection system further comprises a second magnetic scanhead including an electromagnet, the electromagnet being capable of creating a second magnetic field of adjustable intensity, the second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the first magnetic field. The intensity of the second magnetic field is adjusted by changing the amount of current supplied to the electromagnet. The amount of current supplied to the electromagnet is based upon a characteristic of the document to be authenticated.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a magnetic scanhead for sensing a flux measurement of a document being transported past the scanhead is disclosed. The magnetic scanhead comprises a first pole piece perpendicular to the transport direction. The magnetic scanhead further comprises a second pole piece perpendicular to the transport direction and parallel to the first pole piece. The magnetic scanhead further comprises a middle section located between the first pole piece and the second pole piece. The magnetic scanhead further comprises a coil having a conductive core and an insulating material, the coil being twisted around at least a portion of the first pole piece, the coil having a plurality of ends. The magnetic scanhead further comprises at least one power supply wherein the plurality of ends of the coil are electrically connected to the power supply, the power supply being adapted to supply an adjustable and reversible D.C. electric current to the coil. The magnetic scanhead further comprises a sensor between the first pole piece and the second pole piece, the sensor being adapted to sense the flux measurement of the document being transported.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to represent each embodiment, or every aspect, of the present invention. Additional features and benefits of the present invention are apparent from the detailed description, figures, and embodiments set forth below.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments are shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention defined by the appended claims.
To measure currencies containing different magnetic materials, the field requirements may be different, and preferably, variable. To test currencies containing different magnetic materials, the permanent magnets must be changed to create the required fields.
According to various embodiments of the present invention, a variable intensity magnetic scanhead (e.g., an electromagnetic scanhead), a magnetic detection system for authenticating documents—such as currency bills—incorporating the variable intensity magnetic scanhead, a currency processing device incorporating the magnetic detection system, and a method for using the magnetic detection system are disclosed. Generally, in one embodiment of the present invention a denominating sensor is used to identify the denomination of a currency bill and a magnetic scanhead is used to determine the authenticity of the currency bill based on its identified denomination. And generally, in another embodiment, the denomination of a currency bill is manually input by an operator of the device and a magnetic scanhead is used to determine the authenticity of the currency bill.
Turning now to the drawings, and initially to
The magnetic scanhead 300 includes a first pole piece 301, a second pole piece 302, and a middle section 310 located between the pole pieces 301, 302. The pole pieces 301, 302 are positioned perpendicularly to the transport direction, which is depicted by the arrow in
In another embodiment, the first pole piece 301 is constructed of a permanent magnetic material. In some embodiments, the second pole piece is constructed of cold rolled steel, permalloy, or mumetal. In another embodiment, a second coil may be wrapped around the second pole piece 302. This second coil may be connected to the power supply 306 or a separate power supply may be connected to the second coil.
The coil 304 may have as many revolutions around the first pole piece 301 as required to create the necessary field. According to one embodiment of the present invention, a coil 304 has about 1000 to about 8000 turns around the first pole piece 301. As is readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, the greater the number of turns in the coil 304, the greater the magnetic field produced by a constant current. This value is referred to as the amp-turns, which is the applied current (in amps) multiplied by the number of turns in the winding. The magnetic scanhead 300 may be designed to utilize a wide range of D.C. current power supplies.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a scanhead is provided with between about 0.0 amp-turns to about 0.1 amp-turns. In another embodiment, a scanhead is provided with between about 0.1 and about 2 amp-turns. In another embodiment, a scanhead is provided with greater than about 2 amp-turns until the magnetic saturation point of the pole piece (a function of the design and materials of the pole piece) is reached. The number of amp-turns required varies directly with the type and denomination of currency to be processed. Thus, the larger the required field, the greater the amp-turns that should be provided to the scanheads.
Depending on the particular application, the coil may have numerous turns so as to reduce the D.C. current required to produce the field which, in turn, reduces the noise and heat created in producing the magnetic field. For example, it may be desirable to reduce the heat, circuitry, size, and radiated E-M noise, when the scanhead is incorpoarted into a currency processing system 10 (
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the coil 304 is wrapped around both the first pole piece 301 and the second pole piece 302. According to yet another embodiment, a second coil is wrapped around the second pole piece 302 and both the coil 304 and the second coil produce the desired magnetic field.
The magnetic scanhead 300 includes a magnetic sensor 308 that is positioned adjacent the bill transport path 309 (shown by a pair of dashed lines in
In one embodiment, the magnetic sensor 308 is an unshielded magnetoresistive sensor used to measure the flux of the moving bill 22. Examples of magnetoresistive sensors are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,119,025; 4,683,508; 4,413,296; 4,388,662; and 4,164,770. In another embodiment, a standard audio head is used.
In the illustrated embodiment, the middle section 310 of the magnetic scanhead 300 is a permanent magnet. The permanent magnet may be constructed of any hard magnetic material, e.g., AlNiCo 5, 7 or 9(alnico), SmCo (samarium cobalt), NdFeB (Neodynium Iron Boron), etc. The permanent magnet may be used to reduce the amount of current required by the coil 304 to create the overall magnetic field. For example, a magnetic field of at least about ±100 Oe is provided for the evaluation of most currency bills, according to one embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, a permanent magnet of about ±100 Oe is incorporated into the magnetic scanhead 300 and the coil 304 would then adjust this constant field according to the particular requirements for the passing bill 22 as is described below. Alternatively, in other embodiments, the middle section 310 is not a magnet and the coil 304 creates the entire field required to authenticate the passing bill 22 as described below.
The second scanhead 320, is similar to the first scanhead 300, and comprises a first pole piece 321, a second pole piece 322, a middle section 330 (or spacer bar) located between the pole pieces 321, 322 opposite the transport path, and a coil 324 winding around the first pole piece 321, according to one embodiment. The power supply 326 supplies a sufficient current to the coil 324 to create a magnetic field in a second direction, which is opposite in polarity from the field created by the first scanhead 300. The second scanhead 320 further comprises a sensor 328 used to measure the flux of the bill 22 after being magnetized by the second magnetic field. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the coil 324 is wrapped around both the first pole piece 321 and the second pole piece 322. According to yet another embodiment, a second coil is wrapped around the second pole piece 322 and both the coil 324 and the second coil produce the desired magnetic field.
As shown in
The permanent magnet is included in the present embodiment to reduce the amount of current required to produce the desired magnetic field. A permanent magnet is also useful in embodiments where a preset saturation field is desired. In these embodiments, the permanent magnet should be of sufficient strength to saturate the field of any bill that would potentially be inserted into the system 10. Once the bill 22 has been exposed to the saturation field, the magnetic sensor 308 in the first scanhead 300 measures the flux of the continuously moving bill 22.
As discussed, the magnetic scanhead 300 should produce a magnetic field with a strength at the surface of the note that is larger than the field required to saturate the note's magnetic material. Generally, a saturation field strength of at least three times larger than the coercivity of the bill's magnetic material ensures that the note becomes saturated, though this field strength may be reduced or increased if desired. Thus, the saturation field can range in strength from about 0 Oe to in excess of about 3000 Oe depending on the magnetic properties of the bill to be authenticated. The reverse field can range in strength from about 0 Oe to in excess of about 3000 Oe as well. A scanhead according to the present invention can be designed to cover all or part of this range. According to one embodiment, a scanhead is provided that creates a field from about 0 Oe to in excess of about 3000 Oe. In another embodiment, a scanhead is provided that creates a field from about 0-10 Oe. In another embodiment, a scanhead creates a field from about 10-350 Oe. In another embodiment, a scanhead creates a field from about 350-3000 Oe. In another embodiment, a scanhead creates a field in excess of about 3000 Oe.
The transport mechanism continues to move the bill 22 past the first scanhead 300 to the second scanhead 320. As discussed earlier, during and/or possibly after exposure to the first magnetic scanhead 300, the currency bill 22 (specifically, the magnetic material exposed to the field) is fully saturated such that the magnetic materials in the bill 22 are completely aligned in a first direction. The magnetic field produced by the second scanhead 320 should be of sufficient strength to reverse the magnetization direction of the genuine bill 22 (e.g., align at least a majority of the magnetic material in a second direction, opposite the first direction). The second scanhead 320 creates a field at a predetermined percentage of the genuine bill's reverse saturation field (e.g., 25% saturation, 50% saturation, 60% saturation, 75% saturation, etc.). The field strength and percentage of the reverse saturation field are specific to the particular type and denomination of the bill 22.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the middle section 330 of the second scanhead 320 is a permanent magnet. In this embodiment, the permanent magnet in the second scanhead 320 would create a constant magnetic field of opposite polarity from the field created in the first scanhead 300. In this embodiment, the coil 324 would be used to increase or decrease the field strength based upon the specific parameters required for the bill 22.
In yet another alternative embodiment of the present invention, the coil 304 is removed from the first scanhead 300 and only a permanent magnet is used to create the saturation field. In this embodiment, the permanent magnet would be chosen so as to saturate the magnetization of a bill regardless of the bill type or denomination. In yet another embodiment, the middle section 310 is a spacer bar (instead of a permanent magnet). In this embodiment, the coil 304 creates the entire magnetic field required to saturate the magnetization of the bill 22.
In another embodiment, a first array of scanheads 300 and a second array of scanheads 320 may be used. In such embodiments, the scanheads incorporated in the arrays take flux readings along multiple segments of the bill 22 parallel to the direction of transport of the bill 22. This is particularly useful where the bill 22 incorporates multiple magnetic materials or has multiple magnetic zones on the face of the currency bill. Where arrays are used, according to some such embodiments, the coils within each scanhead can adjust the generated electric fields independently of the other scanheads. Thus, the arrays allow different fields to be used at different lateral locations across the transport path to further authenticate a bill 22.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the arrays of scanheads are aligned with each other such that the area of the bill 22 which passes under a first scanhead of the first array, will subsequently pass under a first scanhead of the second array. Further, according to other embodiments, additional arrays can be added to the above magnetic detection system as desired.
Referring now to
As the bill moves past the one or more authentication sensors 20 which includes the magnetic detection system 290, it is exposed to the saturation field, step 362, produced by the first magnetic scanhead 300. At step 364 the magnetic flux of the bill is measured by the magnetic sensor 308 as the bill 22 moves past the first magnetic scanhead 300 while the bill 22 is still exposed to the magnetic field. The sensor 308 outputs a signal indicative of the magnetic flux of the currency bill. Next, as the bill 22 continues to move along the bill transport path 309, the bill 22 moves past the second magnetic scanhead 320 (
Upon receiving the magnetic flux measurements from each of the sensors 308, 328 within the magnetic scanheads 300, 320, the CPU 30 evaluates the flux measurements at step 374. Initially, at step 376, the CPU 30 compares the flux measurement obtained at step 364 to the flux measurement obtained at step 368 to ensure that the obtained flux measurements are of opposite polarities. If the CPU 30 determines the polarities do not favorably compare (i.e., are not opposite), the bill is flagged as a suspect note and the CPU 30 generates an error signal at step 382. If, the polarities favorably compare (i.e., are opposite), the CPU 30 calculates a ratio of the first flux measurement (obtained by the first scanhead 300) to the second flux measurement (obtained by the second scanhead 320) at step 377. The ratio of the flux measurements is compared to the stored known ratio, at step 378, to evaluate the authenticity of the bill 22. According to some embodiments, the ratio is compared to a look-up table which contains the standard known ratios for the various bills the system is designed to process. If the ratio of the flux is not the correct value for the particular bill 22, the bill 22 is flagged as a suspect document at step 382. If, however, the flux ratio is the correct value for the particular bill 22, the bill 22 is determined to be authentic at step 380. The sensitivity of the device can be adjusted by changing the allowed deviation between the flux ratio of the bill 22 being evaluated and the stored flux ratio. As the allowed deviation is reduced, the sensitivity of the device is increased. U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,503, further discusses setting the sensitivity of a currency processing device and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The above-described authentication method creates a dual verification of the authenticity of the bill. The first authentication occurs when it is determined that a phase change has occurred between the fully magnetized bill and the bill after a reverse polarity field has been applied. The second authentication occurs when it is determined that the flux ratio between the fully magnetized bill and the bill after a reversed polarity field has been applied matches the standard ratio for the particular currency and denomination being authenticated. The utilization of the flux ratio (as opposed to the individual flux determinations) allows the authentication of both crisp, new bills as well as old, worn, and faded bills. The individual flux measurements of a old, worn-down bill will be lower than a new, crisp bill of the same denomination. Thus, were the individual flux measurements of a worn bill to be compared to the stored known flux samples of a new bill, the device may flag an authentic bill as suspect because the values would be different. However, because the present invention evaluates the flux ratio, even as the bill becomes worn, the ratio remains relatively constant. This is because when a bill is worn or faded the signal for both the fully magnetized measurement and the reverse polarity measurement will be lessened in proportion to one another.
Further, the use of a flux ratio allows more design flexibility when incorporating the above-described authentication method into a currency sorting device. The use of the flux ratio allows the transport mechanism to be located at a variety of distances from the sensors because, as the bill becomes further removed from the sensor, both the fully magnetized and reverse polarity measurements will be reduced proportionally. Thus, the use of the flux ratio allows for design flexibility and manufacturing error by eliminating the need for a particular, precise placement of the scanhead relative to the transport path. An example of magnetic properties of bills that can be authenticated using the dual verification method described above, is illustrated in
Referring now to
According to the illustrated embodiment, the evaluation region includes a denominating sensor 17 and an authenticating sensor 20 for obtaining denominating information and authenticating information, respectively, from each currency bill 22 transported past the sensors. The bill 22 is then transported to one or more output receptacles 24 where processed bills are collected for subsequent removal. The output receptacle(s) 24 may include a pair of stacking wheels 126 (
Referring also to
According to the embodiment illustrated in
Referring to
Each scanhead 18 detects light reflected from the bill 22 as it moves across the illuminated light strip 44 and to provide an analog representation of the variation in reflected light, which, in turn, represents the variation in the dark and light content of the printed pattern or indicia on the surface of the bill 22. This variation in light reflected from the narrow dimension scanning of the bills serves as a measure for distinguishing, with a high degree of confidence, among a number of currency types and denominations that the system is programmed to process. The use of this type of scanning is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,815,592 and 5,687,963, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
According to some embodiments, the system is also capable of “learning” master denominating information when an operator processes the required number of genuine notes. This type of neural-network “learning” is well known in the art, and need not be detailed further for this particular invention. The use of neural-network learning is more thoroughly described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,072,565; 6,237,739; and 6,241,069, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
In other embodiments, the denominating sensor may only include a single scanhead 18a or 18b for scanning one surface of a bill. In other alternative embodiments of the present invention, additional sensors replace or are used in conjunction with the optical scanheads 18a,b in the system 10 to analyze, authenticate, denominate, count, and/or otherwise process currency bills. For example, size detection sensors, magnetic sensors, thread sensors, and/or ultraviolet/fluorescent/infrared light sensors may be used in the currency processing device 10 to evaluate currency bills. The use of these types of sensors for currency evaluation are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,790,697, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Further, a fitness sensor that may be used in connection with the currency processing system of
In alternative applications, wherein the operator expects that all the bills 22 are of the same denomination, and desires to simply authenticate and/or count the stack of currency bills 22, the operator may input the denomination of the bills to be processed via the operator interface 36. In this embodiment, any bill not of the expected denomination would be flagged as a stranger bill.
Referring now to
The transport mechanism 414 transports a bill 422 past an authenticating sensor 420. The authenticating sensor 420 is for obtaining authenticating characteristic information from each currency bill 422 transported past the sensors. The authenticating sensor 420 may be adapted to incorporate scanheads 300 and 320. The bill 422 is then transported to one or more output receptacles 424 where processed bills are collected for subsequent removal. The system 410 includes an operator interface 436 for displaying information to an operator and/or receiving operator input from an operator.
According to the illustrated embodiment, the bill transport path is defined in such a way that the transport mechanism 414 moves currency bills 422 with the narrow dimension of the bills 422 parallel to the transport direction. Alternatively, the bills 422 could be moved with the wide dimension of the bills 422 parallel to the transport path.
Referring to
The single-pocket device 100 is compact and designed to be rested on a tabletop. The device 100 of
Referring now to
The two output receptacles 124a,b may be utilized in a variety of fashions according in various applications. For example, in the processing of currency bills, the bills may be directed to the first output receptacle 124a until a predetermined number of bills have been transported to the first output receptacle 124a (e.g., until the first output receptacle 124a reaches capacity or a strap limit) and then subsequent bills may be directed to the second output receptacle 124b. In another application, all bills are transported to the first output receptacle 124a except those bills triggering error signals such as, for example, “no call” and “suspect document” error signals, which are transported to the second output receptacle 124b. The two-pocket device 200 includes operator interface 236 for communicating with an operator of the two-pocket device 200. Further details of the operational and mechanical aspects of the two-pocket device 200 are detailed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,966,546; 6,278,795; and 6,311,819; each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The two-pocket device 200 is compact having a height (H2) of about 17½ inches (about 44 cm), a width (W2) of about 13½ inches (about 34 cm), and a depth (D2) of about 15 inches (about 38 cm), and weighs approximately 35 lbs. (about 16 kg). The two-pocket device 200 is compact and is designed to be rested upon a tabletop. The two-pocket device 200 has a footprint of less than about 200 in2 (about 1300 cm2) and occupies a volume of less than about 3500 in3 (about 58,000 cm3).
In yet other alternative embodiments of the present invention, the currency processing system 10 of
While the embodiments discussed in this patent have focused on the authentication of currency bills, the inventors recognize that this invention is equally applicable to the authentication of any article having a magnetic security feature, such as, for example, banking documents, travel documents, checks, deposit slips, coupons and loan payment documents, food stamps, cash tickets, savings withdrawal tickets, check deposit slips, savings deposit slips, traveler checks, lottery tickets, casino tickets, passports, visas, driver licenses, and/or all other documents utilized as a proof of deposit at financial institutions.
Referring now to
As discussed above, the first scanhead 300 (
After the first scanhead 300 saturates the magnetic material, the second scanhead 320 is used to create a field in a second direction. As illustrated the second scanhead 320 creates a field of intensity X1. The magnetization of the materials at intensity X1 is illustrated by point B along the curves. The distance from the X-axis to point A in
A currency processing device having an input receptacle adapted to receive a stack of bills to be processed and a transport mechanism adapted to transport bills, one at a time, from the input receptacle along a transport path to at least one output receptacle, the device comprising:
a denominating sensor disposed along the transport path adapted to obtain denominating characteristic information from each of the bills;
a memory adapted to store master denominating characteristic information and master authentication information;
a first magnetic scanhead disposed along the transport path downstream from the denominating sensor, the first magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills;
a second magnetic scanhead disposed along the transport path downstream from the first magnetic scanhead, the second magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a second magnetic field of variable intensity, the second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the first magnetic field; and
a processor being adapted to receive the denominating characteristic information from the denominating sensor, the controller being adapted to determine the denomination of each of the bills when the obtained denominating characteristic information favorably compares to the stored master denominating characteristic information, the controller being adapted to adjust the second magnetic field intensity based on the determined denomination of each of the bills.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the first magnetic scanhead includes a first sensor for measuring the magnetic flux of the area on each of the bills in response to the first magnetic field and the second magnetic scanhead includes a second sensor for measuring the flux of the area on each of the bills in response to the second magnetic field.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment B, wherein the controller is adapted to determine a flux ratio of the first magnetic flux measurement to the second magnetic flux measurement.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment C, wherein the controller is adapted to compare the determined flux ratio for each of the bills to the stored master authentication information.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment D, wherein the controller is adapted to authenticate each of the bills when the determined flux ratio favorably compares to the stored master authentication information.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment D, wherein the controller is adapted to generate an error signal when the determined flux ratio does not favorably compare to the stored master authentication information.
A currency processing device having an input receptacle adapted to receive a stack of bills to be processed and a transport mechanism adapted to transport bills, one at a time, from the input receptacle along a transport path to at least one output receptacle, the device comprising:
a means for determining the denomination of each of the bills;
a first magnetic scanhead disposed along the transport path, the first magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills, the first magnetic scanhead including a first sensor for measuring the flux of each of the bill in response to the first magnetic field;
a second magnetic scanhead disposed along the transport path downstream from the first magnetic scanhead, the second magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a second magnetic field of variable intensity, the second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the first magnetic field, the second magnetic scanhead including a second sensor for measuring the flux of each of the bills in response to the second magnetic field, the second magnetic scanhead being adjustable to vary the intensity of the magnetic field;
a memory adapted to store master field strength information and master authentication information;
a controller being adapted to determine the required field strength of the second magnetic field by comparing the determined denomination to the master field strength information, the controller being adapted to adjust the second magnetic field intensity based on the required field strength determination, the controller is adapted to determine a flux ratio of the first magnetic flux measurement to the second magnetic flux measurement, the controller being adapted to compare the determined flux ratio for each bill to the stored master authentication information.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment G, wherein the controller is adapted to authenticate each of the bills when the determined flux ratio favorably compares to the stored master authentication information.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment G, wherein the controller is adapted to generate an error signal when the determined flux ratio does not favorably compare to the stored master authentication information.
A method for determining the authenticity of currency bills with a currency processing device, the currency processing device adapted to determine the denomination of each of the currency bills, the method comprising:
transporting each of the currency bills past a first magnetic scanhead and a second magnetic scanhead located downstream from the first magnetic scanhead, the first magnetic scanhead including a first sensor, and the second magnetic scanhead including a second sensor;
creating a first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills;
measuring with the first sensor the magnetic flux of the area on each of the bills in response to the first magnetic field;
adjusting the intensity of the second magnetic field based on the denomination of each of the currency bills, the second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the first magnetic field;
measuring with the second sensor the magnetic flux of the area on each of the bills in response to the second magnetic field; and
determining a flux ratio of the first magnetic flux measurement to the second magnetic flux measurement.
The method of Alternative Embodiment J further comprising providing a controller being adapted to adjust the second magnetic field intensity based on the determined denomination of each of the bills and to determine the flux ratio of the first magnetic flux measurement to the second magnetic flux measurement.
The method of Alternative Embodiment K further comprising comparing the determined flux ratio for each of the bills to stored master authentication information, the controller performing the comparison.
The method of Alternative Embodiment L, further comprising deeming the bill authentic when the determined flux ratio is favorably compared to the stored master authentication information.
The method of Alternative Embodiment L, further comprising generating an error signal when the determined flux ratio does not favorably compare to the stored master authentication information.
The method of Alternative Embodiment J wherein the first magnetic scanhead is contained in a first array of magnetic scanheads and the second magnetic scanhead is contained in a second array of magnetic scanheads.
The method of Alternative Embodiment O wherein the first array of magnetic scanheads and the second array of magnetic scanheads are capable of scanning the entire width of the bill.
The method of Alternative Embodiment O wherein the first array of magnetic scanheads and the second array of magnetic scanheads are capable of scanning the entire length of the bill.
A currency processing device having an input receptacle adapted to receive a stack of bills to be processed and a transport mechanism adapted to transport bills, one at a time, from the input receptacle along a transport path to at least one output receptacle, the device comprising:
a denominating sensor disposed along the transport path adapted to obtain denominating characteristic information from each of the bills;
a memory adapted to store master denominating characteristic information and master authentication information;
a first array comprising a plurality of magnetic scanheads, the first array being disposed along the transport path downstream from the denominating sensor, the plurality of scanheads being adapted to create at least one first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills;
a second array comprising a plurality of magnetic scanheads, the second array being disposed along the transport path downstream from the first magnetic scanhead, the plurality of magnetic scanheads being adapted to create at least one second magnetic field of variable intensity, the at least one second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the at least one first magnetic field; and
a controller being adapted to receive the denominating characteristic information from the denominating sensor, the controller being adapted to determine the denomination of each of the bills when the obtained denominating characteristic information favorably compares to the stored master denominating characteristic information, the controller being adapted to adjust the second magnetic field intensity in each of the magnetic scanhead contained in a second array of magnetic scanheads based on the determined denomination of each of the bills and location of the magnetic area in the bill.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment R, wherein the plurality of magnetic scanheads of the first array each have a first sensor for measuring the magnetic flux of the area on each of the bills in response to the first magnetic field and the plurality of magnetic scanheads of the second array each have a second sensor for measuring the flux of the area on each of the bills in response to the second magnetic field.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment S, wherein the controller is adapted to determine a flux ratio of the first magnetic flux measurements to the second magnetic flux measurements in each of the magnetic areas of the bill.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment S, wherein the controller is adapted to compare the determined flux ratios for each of the bills to the stored master authentication information.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment U, wherein the controller is adapted to authenticate each of the bills when the determined flux ratios favorably compare to the stored master authentication information.
The currency processing device of Alternative Embodiment V, wherein the controller is adapted to generate an error signal when the determined flux ratios do not favorably compare to the stored master authentication information.
A magnetic detection system for authenticating a document, the magnetic detection system comprising:
a first magnetic scanhead being adapted to create a first magnetic field for saturating the magnetization of an area on each of the bills;
a second magnetic scanhead including an electromagnet, the electromagnet being capable of creating a second magnetic field of adjustable intensity, the second magnetic field being of opposite polarity from the first magnetic field;
wherein the intensity of the second magnetic field is adjusted by changing the amount of current supplied to the electromagnet, wherein the amount of current supplied to the electromagnet is based upon a characteristic of the document to be authenticated.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, further comprising a controller being adapted to adjust the second magnetic field by changing the amount of current supplied to the electromagnet, wherein the controller adjusts the supplied current based on the characteristic of the document to be authenticated.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, wherein the magnetic detection system is incorporated into a currency processing device.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment Z, wherein the characteristic of the document is a predetermined magnetic pattern of an authentic document.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment AA, wherein the document is a currency bill.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, wherein the characteristic of the document is a predetermined magnetic pattern of an authentic document.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, wherein the second magnetic scanhead includes a permanent magnet adapted to supply a portion of the second magnetic field.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, wherein the second magnetic scanhead is adapted to create a field from about 0 Oe to about 3000 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment AE, wherein the second magnetic scanhead includes a permanent magnet adapted to supply a portion of the field from about 0 Oe to about 3000 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, wherein the second magnetic scanhead is adapted to create a field from about 0 Oe to about 10 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment AG, wherein the scanhead includes a permanent magnet adapted to supply a portion of the field from about 0 Oe to about 10 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, wherein the second magnetic scanhead is adapted to create a field from about 10 Oe to about 350 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment AI, wherein the second magnetic scanhead includes a permanent magnet adapted to supply a portion of the field from about 10 Oe to about 350 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, wherein the second magnetic scanhead is adapted to create a field from about 350 Oe to about 3000 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment AK, wherein the second magnetic scanhead includes a permanent magnet adapted to supply a portion of the field from about 350 Oe to about 3000 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment X, wherein the second magnetic scanhead is adapted to create a field in excess of about 3000 Oe.
The magnetic detection system of Alternative Embodiment AM, wherein the second magnetic scanhead includes a permanent magnet adapted to supply a portion of the field in excess of about 3000 Oe.
A magnetic scanhead for sensing a flux measurement of a document being transported past the scanhead, comprising:
a first pole piece perpendicular to the transport direction;
a second pole piece perpendicular to the transport direction and parallel to the first pole piece;
a middle section located between the first pole piece and the second pole piece;
a coil having a conductive core and an insulating material, the coil being twisted around at least a portion of the first pole piece, the coil having a plurality of ends;
at least one power supply wherein the plurality of ends of the coil are electrically connected to the power supply, the power supply being adapted to supply an adjustable and reversible D.C. electric current to the coil;
a sensor between the first pole piece and the second pole piece, the sensor being adapted to sense the flux measurement of the document being transported.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the middle section is a permanent magnet.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the coil is twisted around both a portion of the first pole piece and a portion of the second pole piece.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, further comprising:
a second coil having a conductive core and an insulating material, the second coil being twisted around at least a portion of the first pole piece, the second coil having a plurality of ends.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AR, wherein the plurality of ends of the second coil are electrically connected to the power supply.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AR, wherein the plurality of ends of the second coil are electrically connected to a second power supply the second power supply being adapted to supply an adjustable and reversible D.C. electric current to the second coil.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the first pole piece is composed of a soft magnetic material.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AS, wherein the soft magnetic material is cold-rolled steel.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AU, wherein the soft magnetic material is permalloy.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AU, wherein the soft magnetic material is mumetal.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the first pole piece is composed of a permanent magnetic material.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the coil and power supply provide the magnetic scanhead with between about 0.0 amp-turns to about 0.1 amp-turns.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the coil and power supply provide the magnetic scanhead with between about 0.1 amp-turns to about 2 amp-turns.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the coil and power supply provide the magnetic scanhead with greater than about 2 amp-turns.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the sensor is a magnetoresistive sensor.
The magnetic scanhead of Alternative Embodiment AO, wherein the sensor is an audio head.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that it is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/614,630, filed on Sep. 30, 2004. The disclosure of the aforementioned provisional application is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4038596 | Lee | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4356473 | Freudenthal | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4593184 | Bryce et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 5068519 | Bryce | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5163672 | Mennie | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5207788 | Geib | May 1993 | A |
| 5295196 | Raterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5418458 | Jeffers | May 1995 | A |
| 5467405 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5467406 | Graves et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| D369984 | Larsen | May 1996 | S |
| 5552589 | Smith et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5633949 | Graves et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5640463 | Csulits | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5644228 | Jeffers et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652802 | Graves et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5687963 | Mennie | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692067 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5704491 | Graves | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5724438 | Graves | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5751840 | Raterman et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5790693 | Graves et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790697 | Jones et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5806650 | Mennie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815592 | Mennie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822448 | Graves et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832104 | Graves et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5867589 | Graves et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870487 | Graves et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875259 | Mennie et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5905810 | Jones et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5909502 | Mazur | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5909503 | Graves et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912982 | Munro et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5938044 | Weggesser | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940623 | Watts et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943655 | Jacobsen | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5960103 | Graves et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966456 | Jones et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5982918 | Mennie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5992601 | Mennie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6012565 | Mazur | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021883 | Casanova et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026175 | Raterman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028951 | Raterman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6039645 | Mazur | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6068194 | Mazur | May 2000 | A |
| 6072896 | Graves et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073744 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6074334 | Mennie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6128402 | Jones et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141161 | Sato et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6220419 | Mennie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6237739 | Mazur et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241069 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256407 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6278795 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6311819 | Stromme et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6318537 | Jones et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6351551 | Munro et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6363164 | Jones et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6371303 | Klein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378683 | Mennie | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6381354 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6398000 | Jenrick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6459806 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6460705 | Hallowell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6493461 | Mennie et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6539104 | Raterman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6560355 | Graves et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6588569 | Jenrick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601687 | Jenrick et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6603872 | Jones et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6621919 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6628816 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6636624 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6647136 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650767 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6654486 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6661910 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6665431 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6678401 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6678402 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6705470 | Klein et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6721442 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6724926 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6724927 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6731785 | Mennie et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6731786 | Jones et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6748101 | Jones et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6778693 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6798899 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6810137 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6843418 | Jones et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6860375 | Hallowell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6866134 | Stromme et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6868954 | Stromme et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6880692 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6913130 | Mazur et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6913260 | Maier et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6915893 | Mennie | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6929109 | Klein et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6955253 | Mazur et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6959800 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6980684 | Munro et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6994200 | Jenrick et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6996263 | Jones et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7000828 | Jones | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7016767 | Jones et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 20010006557 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010015311 | Mennie | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010019624 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010035603 | Graves et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001393 | Jones et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020020603 | Jones et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056605 | Mazur et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085245 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085745 | Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103757 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104785 | Klein et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107801 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020118871 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122580 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126885 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126886 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131630 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136442 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145035 | Jones | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154804 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154805 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154806 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154807 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154808 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186876 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009420 | Jones | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015395 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015396 | Mennie | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059098 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030062242 | Hallowell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081824 | Mennie et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108233 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121752 | Stromme et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121753 | Stromme et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030132281 | Jones et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139994 | Jones | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168308 | Maier et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174874 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182217 | Chiles | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030198373 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202690 | Jones et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030211883 | Potts | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003980 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016621 | Jenrick et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016797 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040028266 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083149 | Jones | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145726 | Csulits et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040149538 | Sakowski | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153408 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154964 | Jones | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040251110 | Jenrick et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050029168 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050035034 | Long | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050040225 | Csulits et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047642 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060055 | Hallowell | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060059 | Klein et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060061 | Jones | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050077142 | Tam et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086271 | Jones et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087422 | Maier et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117791 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2005 | A2 |
| 20050117792 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2005 | A2 |
| 20050150738 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163361 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163362 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169511 | Jones | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050173221 | Maier et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183928 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207634 | Jones et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213803 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241909 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249394 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050265591 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276458 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278239 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010071 | Jones et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060054455 | Kuykendall et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060065717 | Hurwitz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073883 | Franks | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 9111778 | Aug 1991 | WO |
| WO 9217394 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| WO 9323824 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO 9524691 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO 9610800 | Apr 1996 | WO |
| WO 9636933 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO 9730422 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO 9743734 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 9745810 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9812662 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO 9813785 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9824052 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9824067 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9835323 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO 9840839 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 9847100 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9850892 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9859323 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 9909511 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 9914668 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 9923601 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 9941695 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 9948040 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 9948042 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 0024572 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 0108108 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 0159685 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0159723 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0229735 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 02054360 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 03005312 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03028361 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03029913 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03030113 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03067532 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 03017282 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004010367 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004027717 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004036508 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004038631 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004068422 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005013209 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005017842 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005029240 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005036445 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2004041134 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005076229 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060078186 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60614630 | Sep 2004 | US |
