This application is related to the U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/799,480, being filed concurrently herewith, the contents of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The invention relates generally to the field of medical devices for locating tissue in preparation for surgery and more specifically for detecting magnetic markers in tissue for excision.
The recent use of magnetic sensor probes to detect magnetic nanoparticles in the localization of sentinel lymph nodes in the staging of cancer in preparation for surgery has made the job of determining the location of the sentinel nodes easier for the surgeon. Further, the use of a probe to detect magnetic markers has also made relocating biopsy sites easier after pathology microscopic examination of excised tissue.
The inventors of the sensor probes for these systems seek to improve the design by: reducing thermal effects which cause coils in the sensor to shift with respect to one another and reduce the ability of the user to detect the signal from the magnetic nanoparticles; reducing interference caused by diamagnetic responses due to the body itself; and reducing the interference caused by eddy currents induced in objects near the sensor probe. In addition, it is desired that all these functional improvements be accomplished using a smaller sized probe with heightened sensitivity.
The present invention addresses this need.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a probe for detecting a magnetic marker. In one embodiment, the probe includes a probe core having a first end and a second end, the probe core defining two regions for containing coils of wire, one of the regions being adjacent the first end of the cylindrical probe core; two sense coils, one each of the sense coils being located in a respective one of the regions; and two drive coils, one each of the drive coils being located in a respective one of the regions, wherein the regions are separated by a distance equal to or greater than the diameter of one of the coils. In another embodiment, the magnetic marker comprises magnetic nanoparticles. In yet another embodiment, one of the set of two drive coils and the set of two sense coils is connected as a gradiometer, and the other of the set of two drive coils and the set of two sense coils is connected in series. In still yet another embodiment, the regions of the probe core define two channels for containing coils of wire, one of the channels being adjacent the first end of the cylindrical probe core, wherein one each of the sense coils being located in a respective one of the channels, wherein one each of the drive coils being co-located with the respective sense coil in a respective one of the channels, wherein the drive coils are connected in series, and wherein the sense coils are connected in anti-series.
In one embodiment, the drive coil is wound on top of the sense coil. In another embodiment, the regions of the probe core define two channels for containing coils of wire, one of the channels being adjacent the first end of the cylindrical probe core, wherein one each of the sense coils being located in a respective one of the channels, wherein one each of the drive coils being co-located with the respective sense coil in a respective one of the channels, wherein the drive coils are connected in anti-series, and wherein the sense coils are connected in series. In yet another embodiment, the regions of the probe define four channels for containing coils of wire, a respective two of the channels being located in each of the respective regions, wherein two of the channels are located adjacent the first end of the cylindrical probe core, wherein one each of the sense coils being located in a respective one of the channels in each one of the regions, wherein one each of the drive coils being located in a respective one of the channel in each one of the regions, wherein no two coils occupy the same channel, wherein the drive coils are connected in series, and wherein the sense coils are connected in anti-series.
In one embodiment, the regions of the probe define four channels for containing coils of wire, a respective two of the channels being located in each of the respective regions, wherein two of the channels are located adjacent the first end of the cylindrical probe core, wherein one each of the sense coils being located in a respective one of the channels in each one of the regions, wherein one each of the drive coils being located in a respective one of the channel in each one of the regions, wherein no two coils occupy the same channel, wherein the drive coils are connected in anti-series, and wherein the sense coils are connected in series. In another embodiment, the order of the coils from the first end toward the second end of the probe is sense coil, drive coil, sense coil, and drive coil. In still yet another embodiment, the order of the coils from the first end toward the second end of the probe is drive coil, sense coil, drive coil, and sense coil.
In one embodiment, the order of the coils from the first end toward the second end of the probe is sense coil, drive coil, drive coil, and sense coil. In yet another embodiment, the order of the coils from the first end toward the second end of the probe is drive coil, sense coil, sense coil, and drive coil. In still yet another embodiment, the sense coils and the drive coils have different diameters. In another embodiment, the sense coils and the drive coils have different numbers of turns.
In one embodiment, the probe further includes a third drive coil, the third drive coil in series connection between the first and the second drive coil and positioned between the first and second drive coil so as to form a single solenoidal drive coil, wherein one each of the sense coils being located near a respective end of the single solenoidal drive coil. In another embodiment, every turn of the single solenoidal drive coil is of the same diameter. In yet another embodiment, the longitudinal center turn of the single solenoidal drive coil has a greater diameter than turns on the ends of the solenoidal drive coil. In still another embodiment, every turn of the single solenoidal drive coil is of the same spacing. In still yet another embodiment, turns in the longitudinal center of the single solenoidal drive coil have a greater spacing than turns on the ends.
In one embodiment, the probe core comprises a material with a thermal diffusivity of substantially ≧20×10−6 m2/s and a thermal expansion coefficient of substantially <3×10−5/° C. In another embodiment, wherein the probe core comprises a material that has a thermal diffusivity of substantially ≧50×10−6 m2/s and a thermal expansion coefficient of substantially <5×10−6/° C.
The structure and function of the invention can be best understood from the description herein in conjunction with the accompanying figures. The figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrative principles. The figures are to be considered illustrative in all aspects and are not intended to limit the invention, the scope of which is defined only by the claims.
a is a cross section of a solenoidal coil with additional coils on each end:
b is a graph of the field generated by the solenoidal coil of
First, to improve the sensitivity of the coil while reducing its size, it is important to reduce any thermal effects on the operation of the probe, which is highly sensitive to relative change in geometry between the coils, particularly axial movement, and any change in the size of the coils. One of the thermal effects which must be addressed is any asymmetric expansion of the coil arrangement when the end of the probe comes into contact with a warm body, and the coil nearest to the body experiences a higher temperature than the coil further away. Reducing the temperature differential between the coils, while maintaining the low thermal expansion coefficient of the coil former or probe body, permits this sensitivity to be reduced. In other words, it is important to equalize any temperature differential across the coils rapidly so that a thermal gradient cannot be sustained by a thermal input at one end.
When a substance has high thermal diffusivity, heat moves rapidly through the substance because the substance conducts heat quickly relative to its volumetric heat capacity or “thermal bulk.” Therefore, a material with high thermal diffusivity is desirable for the coil former (probe core material) in order to equalize the temperature across the coils as rapidly as possible. Further, suitable materials need to be non-magnetic, non-electrically conducting and have a relatively low thermal expansion coefficient. The low thermal expansion coefficient is required to reduce axial and radial expansion which affects the relative positions of the coils. Table 1 shows relevant properties of various materials.
In one embodiment, the material preferably has a thermal diffusivity of substantially ≧20×10−6 m2/s and a thermal expansion coefficient of substantially <3×10−5/° C. More preferably, the material has a thermal diffusivity of substantially ≧50×10−6 m2/s and a thermal expansion coefficient of substantially <5×10−6/° C. Such materials may include:
Further, it is advantageous for the material to have a high stiffness to avoid change in the position of the coils due to mechanical deformation. In one embodiment, the material has a Young's Modulus of ≧40 GPa and preferably ≧80 GPa, and the material has as high a toughness as can be achieved given the other material constraints. For ceramics, in this application, the likely failure mode is energy- (or shock-) induced brittle fracture, for example when the probe is knocked or dropped. In this case, the relevant material property is the toughness Gic≈Kic2/E (KJm−2) which, along with other probe information, is tabulated in Table 2.
The probe's sensitivity to temperature changes is further reduced by minimizing heat transfer into the probe from outside of the probe. This is achieved by using a high conductivity polymer material for the case, so that the inside surface of the case is closer to an isothermal surface, thus minimizing thermal gradients inside the probe and providing an insulating layer of air or a highly insulating material such as aerogel or a vacuum gap around the probe core, or former, and windings. In addition to the selection of materials, the coil configurations may be selected to reduce thermal effects.
In one embodiment, the probe includes a coil former with two sense coils and two drive coils. The sense and drive coils are arranged in two pairs, each consisting of one sense coil and one drive coil in close proximity to one another. The probe's magnetic sensing performance is maximized by locating one sense and drive coil pair close to the sensing tip of the probe, and locating the second pair of coils an axial distance away from the first pair of coils. The distance is preferably greater than the diameter of the smallest coil, and more preferably greater than the diameter of the largest coil in the pair. By way of example, in one embodiment, the diameter of the largest coil is 15 mm, and in another embodiment, the diameter is 12 mm. In addition, each pair of coils is arranged such that the voltage induced in each of the sense coils by the field generated by the drive coils is approximately equal and opposite. For example, if there are two sense/drive coil pairs S1, D1 and S2, D2, separated by at least a coil diameter, the current induced in S1 by the combined drive fields from D1 and D2 is equal and opposite to the current induced in S2 by the combined drive fields from D1 and D2. Preferably, the sense coils are arranged as a first order gradiometer in order to minimize the effect of far field sources.
In one embodiment of the probe 4 (
In another embodiment of the probe 6 (
Other embodiments which maintain the relative arrangement of each drive/sense pair also fall within the scope of the invention. These embodiments include different orders and symmetry of the pairs, e.g. SD-DS, DS-DS and DS-SD, as well as varying spacing between the pairs of coils. In each case, the coils are connected such that one of the drive pair of coils or the sense pair of coils forms a gradiometer. The other pair of sense coils or drive coils is wired in series, i.e. with the same sense to form a simple magnetometer. A higher order gradiometer can be used for either set of coils, providing that in each case the order of gradiometer of the drive set of coils differs by one from the order of gradiometer of the sense set of coils. For example, the sense coils may form a second order gradiometer and the drive coils may form a first (or third) order gradiometer.
In one embodiment, the winding is arranged together with the electronic circuit such that the outside layer of the coil winding is close to ground potential of the electronics. This minimizes the capacitive coupling between the probe and the patient's body which is assumed to be at ground potential.
Further embodiments include making the sense coil the larger of the two diameters (rather than the drive coil) in combination with any of the above. If a smaller gauge wire is used for the sense coil (as it carries only a tiny current), then making the sense coil the larger of the two is advantageous because it allows the average diameters of the drive and sense coils to be maximized within the specific arrangement of the sense coil/drive coil pairs. Increasing the diameter and therefore the areas of the coils increases the sensitivity of the magnetic sensor. A larger gauge of wire may be used for the drive coil in order to minimize ohmic heating.
Further, when the diameter of the probe is reduced, the magnetic sensitivity is commensurately reduced by a factor of r4 in the near field (drive field drops off with r2 and sensing capability with r2) and r6 in the far field. Therefore, in order to maintain a similar level of magnetic sensitivity in a smaller diameter probe, the number of turns in the coils, particularly in the sense coils, is increased. However, as a side effect, this also magnifies any noise or drift by the same factor. Thus, drift due to changes in the coil geometry caused by temperature changes should be expected to be magnified.
However, by using the staggered coil arrangement and the Shapal-M coil core, the thermal drift due to warm body contact can be maintained at an acceptable level. For example, with a smaller diameter probe of the staggered coil arrangement, the signal change in response to contact with a warm body at 37° C. is about 86% of the equivalent signal change in one of the prior art systems. Because the smaller probe has twice as many coil turns, the signal change should therefore be much greater than this.
In a further embodiment (
The more uniform the field is close to the ends of the solenoid, the closer the sense coils can be positioned to the end of the probe, and the better the sensitivity. The uniformity of the field at the ends of the solenoid is optimized by appropriate design of the coils, for example, by varying the spacing, the diameter, both the spacing and diameter, or the shape of the solenoid coils (
A particular example is shown in
In addition to manipulating the coils and their structure and locations, a further embodiment addresses the issue of distinguishing between the signal from the iron oxide nanoparticles and the signals from other metallic objects. In this embodiment, a second varying magnetic drive field is generated at a lower frequency than the primary drive field and with comparable or greater magnitude than the primary drive field. The secondary drive field modulates the susceptibility of the magnetic nanoparticles and creates additional frequency components in the spectrum received by the sense coils at frequencies f0±2nf1, where f0 is the primary drive field frequency and f1 is the secondary drive field frequency and n is a whole number (
In one embodiment, the amplitude of the side lobe at f0±2f1 is measured to detect the presence of magnetic nanoparticles. In an alternative embodiment, the ratio of the amplitude Af0±2f1 of the side lobe to the amplitude Af0 of the fundamental (Af0±2f1/Af0) is measured. Other embodiments are possible that result in an advantageous combination of frequencies. These components are less sensitive or even insensitive to coil structure and geometric imbalance, temperature effects, and also to eddy currents. Thus, by appropriate signal processing, the undesirable disturbance from coil structure and geometric imbalance, temperature sensitivity, and metallic objects can be reduced or eliminated.
In practice, the geometrical symmetry of construction needed for a perfect electromagnetic balance is very difficult to achieve within the constraints of state-of-the-art and cost-effective construction, and there is usually some level of residual imbalance. Furthermore, temperature fluctuations experienced by the coils, particularly non-uniform changes, for example when the end of the probe (near one coil) comes into contact with a warm body, will create additional dynamic imbalance in the coils as the geometry of the coils varies slightly due to thermal expansion.
These imbalances in the coils manifest themselves as a disturbance signal at the fundamental primary drive frequency f0, caused by the sense coil detecting a non-cancelled residual direct magnetic signal from the drive coils. However, any signal at a mixed or modulated frequency f0±2nf1 resulting from the secondary frequency f1 is only generated by the magnetic response of the nanoparticles to f1, and therefore at these frequencies there is no disturbance signal component caused by any coil imbalance. Thus, by extracting these components from the overall signal received by the sense coils, these frequency components can be used to detect the presence of the nanoparticles and distinguish them from disturbance caused by magnetic imbalance of the coils whether caused by imperfections in construction or thermally-induced distortions.
Further, the drive field from the probe will induce eddy currents in any electrically conducting object, e.g. metallic surface that is sufficiently close, and the magnetic field created by the eddy currents may then be picked up by the sense coils as an extraneous signal. However, as with the imbalances described above, there is no frequency mixing with the signals produced by eddy currents. Thus, the mixed or modulated frequencies f0±2nf1 do not show any component of fields generated by eddy currents, which means that non-ferromagnetic materials can be distinguished from nanoparticles. Thus, by extracting these components from the overall signal received by the sense coils, these f1 frequency components can be used to detect the presence of the nanoparticles and distinguish them from non-ferromagnetic materials. Because the nanoparticles generate side lobes, the existence of side lobes are indicative of nanoparticles and one such measure of the presence of nanoparticles is obtained by measuring the amplitude of the side lobe. The greater the side lobe amplitude, the more nanoparticles are being determined. To adjust for noise in the signals, it is possible to normalize the measurement of the presence of nanoparticles by using the ratio of the amplitude Af0±2nf1 of a side lobe to the amplitude Af0 of the fundamental (Af0±2nf1/Af0) where n is a whole number.
An additional benefit of making the system insensitive to eddy currents is that the primary drive frequency can be increased to take advantage of the increased sensitivity of the magnetic nanoparticles at higher frequencies. For example, the frequency could be increased to significantly more than 10 kHz; e.g., to 50 kHz or 100 kHz or 250 kHz or more. However, ferromagnetic materials will exhibit both eddy current and magnetic responses, and have similar non-linear magnetic properties to the nanoparticles. Hence, the magnetic part of the response is not readily distinguishable from the magnetic nanoparticles.
Because the magnetic nanoparticles have a non-linear frequency response, the response of the particles can be distinguished from the diamagnetic effect of the body, which has a linear effect. Therefore, the present invention can also be used to screen out the diamagnetic effect.
The use of a secondary drive field is suitable for use with any of the coil embodiments and, for any given embodiment, the detection of the magnetic field will be much less sensitive to imbalances in the coils. This system does not require a balanced coil arrangement, provided that the fundamental frequency can be filtered out effectively, although practically this may be desirable for other reasons, e.g. to avoid saturating the input electronics.
The frequency of the secondary drive field is chosen to provide sufficient frequency separation from the primary drive frequency band. This may be, for example, in the region of 0.5% to 10% of the primary frequency and preferably in the range of 1% to 5%. For a primary frequency of 100 kHz, a secondary frequency of 10 Hz to 10 kHz, and more preferably between 100 Hz and 1 kHz, could be used. For example, in one embodiment the primary frequency is 100 kHz and the secondary 1 kHz. Advantageously, the secondary frequency may be chosen to be a multiple of the power supply frequency, e.g. n×50 or n×60 Hz, such that the secondary drive can be derived from power supply frequency, but the power supply frequency does not interfere with the sensing. For example, the primary frequency may be 10 kHz and the secondary frequency 200 Hz. Further, a resonant drive circuit may be used for generating the primary field to maximize the magnetic field strength for a given level of power input. For clinical applications like sentinel lymph node biopsy, a secondary field strength in the region of interest of at least 15 microTesla, and preferably greater than 25 microTesla, is appropriate.
In one embodiment, the secondary field is generated by the handheld probe containing the sensing and primary drive fields, for example by having a moving permanent magnet. The movement of the magnet can be, for example, an oscillatory, rotating or vibratory movement. Alternatively, in one embodiment, an additional coil is added to the probe and is driven so as to create a time varying magnetic field. In another embodiment, the secondary field is generated away from the probe, for example by means of a device placed near the patient. In another embodiment, the field is generated in a pad that sits underneath the area of the patient that is being sensed. In this case, a coil diameter of at least 200 mm is desirable and a field strength of 2.5 mT (or H field of 2000 A/m) is desirable at the center of the coil to provide sufficient secondary field strength in the region of interest where the probe will be used.
In more detail, and referring to
It should be understood that the order of steps or order for performing certain actions is immaterial so long as the present teachings remain operable. Moreover, two or more steps or actions may be conducted simultaneously.
It is to be understood that the figures and descriptions of the invention have been simplified to illustrate elements that are relevant for a clear understanding of the invention, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, other elements. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, however, that these and other elements may be desirable. However, because such elements are well known in the art, and because they do not facilitate a better understanding of the invention, a discussion of such elements is not provided herein. It should be appreciated that the figures are presented for illustrative purposes and not as construction drawings. Omitted details and modifications or alternative embodiments are within the purview of persons of ordinary skill in the art.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting on the invention described herein. Scope of the invention is thus indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2614164 | Huston | Oct 1952 | A |
3445928 | Beynon | May 1969 | A |
3449662 | Wood | Jun 1969 | A |
4324255 | Barach et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4825162 | Roemer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4983912 | Roehrlein et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5005001 | Cordery | Apr 1991 | A |
5184070 | Besendorfer et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5261403 | Saito et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5293119 | Podney | Mar 1994 | A |
5363845 | Chowdhury et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5402094 | Enge | Mar 1995 | A |
5414356 | Yoshimura et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416413 | Leussler | May 1995 | A |
5437280 | Hussman | Aug 1995 | A |
5512821 | Ando et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5534778 | Loos et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537037 | Otaka et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5657756 | Vrba et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666052 | Sata | Sep 1997 | A |
5844140 | Seale | Dec 1998 | A |
5942209 | Leavitt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5997473 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6076008 | Bucholz | Jun 2000 | A |
6082366 | Andra et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6173715 | Sinanan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6205352 | Carroll | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230038 | von Gutfeld et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270464 | Fulton, III et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6304075 | von Schaewen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6347241 | Burbank et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6356782 | Sirimanne et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371904 | Sirimanne et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394965 | Klein | May 2002 | B1 |
6406420 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418335 | Avrin et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6427081 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445185 | Damadian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6549800 | Atalar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6592608 | Fisher et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603308 | Itozaki et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6638913 | Speck et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6662040 | Henrichs et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662041 | Burbank et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699205 | Fulton, III et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725083 | Burbank et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6766186 | Hoyns et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6815949 | Kandori et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835572 | Mountford et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6850065 | Fujita et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862470 | Burbank et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889073 | Lampman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6920346 | Kazandjian et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6949926 | Murakami et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963769 | Balaban et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6996433 | Burbank et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009398 | Hahn et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7044957 | Foerster et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7084631 | Qu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7116094 | Levin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7229417 | Foerster et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7283868 | Ko et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7329414 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335511 | Mountford et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7386338 | Hoppel et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7412275 | Marinelli | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7416533 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7479784 | Lee | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7525308 | Tsukada et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7535363 | Gisselberg et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7570056 | Nakabayashi et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7625397 | Foerster et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668582 | Sirimanne et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676256 | Satragno et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680524 | Ogawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689267 | Prince | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7701209 | Green | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7702378 | Bolan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711407 | Hughes et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7744852 | Chernomorsky et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783336 | Macfarlane et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792569 | Burbank et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7877133 | Burbank et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7972619 | Fisher | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8050742 | Weizman | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060183 | Leopold et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062215 | Voegele et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8064987 | Carr, Jr. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8118754 | Flynn et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8137320 | Mark et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8174259 | Hattersley et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8219182 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8277391 | Foerster et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8280486 | Miller et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010011155 | Rapoport | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010012915 | Avrin et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049481 | Fulton, III et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020019595 | Osborne et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035324 | Sirimanne et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020161298 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030016010 | Kandori et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030078493 | Ogawa et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030141868 | Bakharev | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030214313 | Omura et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216632 | McClure et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040052034 | Senba et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040109823 | Kaplan | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138555 | Krag et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162477 | Okamura et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040236213 | Jones et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249261 | Torchia et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033157 | Klein et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059881 | Balaban et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050148863 | Okamura et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060074295 | Kucharczyk et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060173283 | Axelsson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060258933 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270930 | Brasile | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293581 | Plewes et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070093726 | Leopold et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080074109 | Tsukada et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097199 | Mullen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080146914 | Polzin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161848 | Fisher | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080214930 | Brasile | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228164 | Nicoson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080275333 | Fain et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294036 | Hoi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024022 | Azar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082662 | Israel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090118611 | He | May 2009 | A1 |
20090164161 | Hong et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090201016 | Hattersley et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216113 | Meier et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100030149 | Carr, Jr. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100099978 | Geppert et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125191 | Sahin | May 2010 | A1 |
20100305430 | Troesken | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110021888 | Sing et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110133730 | Hattersley | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137154 | Hattersley et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120229130 | Hattersley et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29724862 | Feb 2005 | DE |
29724862 | Mar 2005 | DE |
102007009016 | Aug 2008 | DE |
0126580 | Nov 1984 | EP |
0595227 | May 1994 | EP |
0663599 | May 1997 | EP |
1249207 | Oct 2002 | EP |
0966924 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1284123 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1062911 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1491147 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2267471 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2339343 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2689638 | Apr 1992 | FR |
2770779 | May 1999 | FR |
2109112 | May 1983 | GB |
2425610 | Jan 2006 | GB |
02-078983 | Mar 1990 | JP |
02-281170 | Nov 1990 | JP |
05-251774 | Sep 1993 | JP |
06-324021 | Nov 1994 | JP |
08-015229 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08-248004 | Sep 1996 | JP |
08-338864 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09-027057 | Jan 1997 | JP |
10-038854 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2003-149212 | May 2003 | JP |
2005-168678 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-030004 | Feb 2006 | JP |
9504287 | Feb 1995 | WO |
9807052 | Feb 1998 | WO |
0038579 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0239917 | May 2002 | WO |
0239917 | May 2002 | WO |
2005011512 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2006009048 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006022786 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006056739 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006117530 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007034196 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007053533 | May 2007 | WO |
2011033306 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011067576 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2014013235 | Jan 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Harnan, S.E. et al.; “Magnetic resonance for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis”; EJSO The Journal of Cancer Surgery; 2011; vol. 37, pp. 928-936. |
Material Safety Data Sheet; Revision Date Mar. 5, 2007; Retrieved from the internet: URL:https://tools.lifetechnologies.com/content/sfs/msds/2007/11361DVIAL1:MTR-NAIV—EN.pdf [retrieved on Jun. 10, 2014]; abstract; (6 pages). |
Tsay, Tzong T. et al.; “Deep Cervical Lymph Flow Following the Infusion of Mannitol in Rabbits”; Life Sciences; 1997; vol. 61, No. 19; pp. 1929-1934. |
Cash, et al., “Breast Cancers: Noninvasive Method of Preoperative Localization with Three-dimensional US and Surface Contour Mapping,” Published online before print Sep. 21, 2007, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452060906; Nov. 2007 Radiology, 245, pp. 556-566 (downloaded on Sep. 28, 2011 from http://radiology.rsna.org/content/245/2/556.full). |
Conners, “Diagnostic uses of metal detectors: a review,” Int. J. Clin. Pract. Aug. 2005:59(8), pp. 946-949, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. |
Fagaly, “Squid Detection of Electronic Circuits,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 25, No. 2, Mar. 1989, pp. 1216-1218. |
Freitas Jr., “Nanomedicine, vol. I: Basic Capabilities,” www.nanomedicine.com/NMI/8.2.1.2.htm, Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX, 1999, 4 pages. |
Gopee, et al., “Migration of Intradermally Injected Quantum Dots to Sentinel Organs in Mice,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 98(1), Apr. 2007, pp. 249-257. |
Gunasekera, et al., “Imaging applications of nanotechnology in cancer,” Targeted Oncology, 2009, vol. 4, pp. 169-181. |
Jakub, et al., “Current Status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions,” The American Journal of Surgery, Apr. 2010, vol. 199, No. 4, pp. 522-528. |
Kim, et al., “Near-infrared fluorescent type II quantum dots for sentinel lymph node mapping,” Nat Biotechnol., vol. 22 (1), Jan. 2004, pp. 93-97. |
Meenach, “Synthesis and Characterixation of Magnetic Hydrogel Nanocomposites for Cancer Therapy Applications,” University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations, 2010, paper 108, http://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool—diss/108. |
Noguchi, et al., “Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer: identification of sentinel lymph node and detection of metastases,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 53, 1999, pp. 97-104. |
Peleg, et al., “Implementing metal detector technology and a navigation system in the removal of shrapnel,” Computer Aided Surgery, Dec. 2009, vol. 14, No. 1-3; pp. 63-68. |
Peleg, et al., “Integration of computer-aided navigation and metal detector technology in the removal of shrapnel in terror attacks casualties,” 7th Int. Conf. Computer-Aided Orthopaedic Surgery, Heidelberg, Germany, 2007, pp. 57-60. |
Postma, et al., “Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions,” Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. vol. 11, No. 8, 2011, pp. 1295-1302. |
Reddy, et al., “Preparation & application of magnetic hydrogel nanocomposites for pritein purification and metal absorption,” International Conference on Advances in Polymer Technology, Feb. 26-27, 2010, India, pp. 83-97. |
Soltesz, et al., “Intraoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping of the Lung Using Near-Infrared Fluorescent Quantum Dots,” Ann Thorac. Surg., vol. 79(1), Jan. 2005, pp. 269-277 (reproduced from NIH Public Access). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2010/002233, mailed Mar. 16, 2011, 15 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2013/051885, mailed Nov. 14, 2013, 18 pages. |
English translation of Official Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508306, dispatched on Nov. 8, 2011, 6 pages. |
European Search Report for EP 10180206, Nov. 23, 2010, 4 pages. |
Williamson, S.J. et al.; “Biomagnetism”; Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials; XP000574230; 1981; vol. 22; pp. 129-201. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140266174 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |