Circuit breakers typically provide protection against the very high currents produced by short circuits. This type of protection is provided in many circuit breakers by a magnetic trip unit, which trips the circuit breaker's operating mechanism to open the circuit breaker's main current-carrying contacts upon a short circuit condition.
Modern magnetic trip units include a magnet yoke (anvil) disposed about a current carrying strap, an armature (lever) pivotally disposed near the anvil, and a spring arranged to bias the armature away from the magnet yoke. Upon the occurrence of a short circuit condition, very high currents pass through the strap. The increased current causes an increase in the magnetic field about the magnet yoke. The magnetic field acts to rapidly draw the armature towards the magnet yoke, against the bias of the spring. As the armature moves towards the yoke, the end of the armature contacts a trip lever, which is mechanically linked to the circuit breaker operating mechanism. Movement of the trip lever trips the operating mechanism, causing the main current-carrying contacts to open and stop the flow of electrical current to a protected circuit.
Currently, circuit breakers having a magnetic trip unit described above allow for adjusting the air gap distance between the magnet yoke and the armature to obtain different trip set points. The trip set point range offered by adjusting the distance between the magnet yoke and the armature is limited because a large trip set point range requires a large air gap adjustment range. Because available space is often limited, a smaller than desired adjustment range results. Furthermore, overcurrent protection at a low current trip setting (e.g., three times the rated current of the circuit breaker) is inhibited because the magnetically induced force acting on the armature isn't significant enough to trip the latch system.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the electrical load of a motor is characterized by a starting (run-up) current and a running current. The starting current averages about six times the full load current of the motor, but the peak of the first half cycle, the so-called “inrush” current, can reach values of up to twenty times the full load current. The lower overcurrent range for motor protection is commonly 3× the full load current of the motor.
It is necessary for such magnetic trip units to be reliable at a low overcurrent setting without altering the magnetically induced force acting on the armature at high overcurrent settings. In addition, it is desired that magnetic trip units offer a broader spectrum of overcurrent ranges (e.g., for use in motor protection), so that the breaker can offer a broader range to trip at different levels of overcurrent. It is also desired that the magnetic trip units be compact.
The above discussed and other drawbacks and deficiencies are overcome or alleviated by a magnetic trip unit for actuating a latching mechanism to trip a circuit breaker upon an overcurrent condition, the magnetic trip unit including: a first electrically conductive strap configured to conduct an electrical current; a first magnet yoke disposed proximate to the first electrically conductive strap; and a first armature pivotally disposed proximate to the first magnetic yoke in operable communication with the latching mechanism; the first armature providing a magnetic path having a reluctance to magnetic flux; and the reluctance is adjusted to prevent saturation of the magnetic flux when the current through the strap is a first number times a rated current of the circuit breaker and the reluctance is adjusted to promote saturation of magnetic flux when the current through the strap is a second number times the rated current of the circuit breaker, wherein the first number is a number smaller than the second number.
In an alternative embodiment, a method of increasing an induced magnetic force from a magnet yoke on a pivotally mounted armature of a trip unit in a circuit breaker at a low current without substantially altering the induced magnetic force acting on the armature at a high current, the method comprising: configuring the armature to provide a magnetic path having a reluctance to a magnetic flux; and adjusting the reluctance of the magnetic path to prevent saturation of the magnetic flux when a current through the trip unit is a first number times a rated current of the circuit breaker, and the magnetic path is generally saturated when the current through the circuit breaker is a second number times the rated current, wherein the first number is a number smaller than the second number.
Referring to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
A circuit breaker 1 equipped with an adjustable magnetic trip unit of the present disclosure is shown in
The latching mechanism 11 can be actuated by a trip lever 13 that pivots about an axis of rotation 12. The other end of the trip lever 13 contacts a trip shaft 14, which is mounted on an axis 15 supported by the circuit breaker housing 9. Disposed on the trip shaft 14 is a cam 14a, which can be pivoted clockwise in opposition to the force of a torsional spring 14b wound about the axis 15.
Mounted to the circuit breaker housing 9 in the bottom region of the circuit breaker is a rotational solenoid type magnetic assembly comprising a magnet yoke 16 and a biased armature 18. Magnet yoke 16 encircles a current carrying strap 17 electrically connected to one of the contacts of the circuit breaker 1. Arranged facing the magnet yoke is the armature 18 in the form of a metallic lever, which is hinge-mounted by means of hinge pin sections 19 to hinge knuckles (not shown) formed on the circuit breaker housing 9. The armature 18 is also connected to strap 17 by a spring 20, which biases the armature 18 in the clockwise direction, away from the magnet yoke 16. In its upper region, armature 18 is equipped with a clip 21 rigidly mounted thereon, which can be brought into contact with the cam 14a by pivoting of the armature in a counter-clockwise direction. Movement of cam 14a by the armature 18 causes the trip shaft 14 to rotate about axis 15 and thereby actuate the latching mechanism 11 by means of the trip lever 13. Once actuated, latching mechanism 11 releases latch 8 to initiate the tripping process in circuit breaker 1. While the clip 21 is described herein as being mounted to armature 18, the clip 21 can also be formed as one piece with the armature 18, preferably of metal.
Referring now to
In the unactuated state of the magnet yoke 16, which is to say when the contact arm 2 (
The circuit breaker with adjustable magnetic trip unit shown in
In the case of a short circuit, an overcurrent naturally occurs, which flows through the current carrying strap 17. This activates the magnet yoke 16 to the extent that when a specific current is exceeded, the magnetic force generated by the magnet yoke is sufficient to attract the armature 18 in opposition to the tensile force exerted by the spring 20. Armature 18 pivots towards yoke 16, and the cam 14a is pivoted clockwise in
As shown in
Referring to
The armature 18 comprises of generally a flat metallic plate having a portion of material removed in the form of a rectangle 60. Above rectangle 60 is a crossbeam component 62 of armature 18 that joins legs 64, 66. Crossbeam 62 includes an aperture 68 formed therein for attaching one end of spring 20. Clip 21 is formed at a top edge 70 of armature 18.
Electrical current passing through strap 17 (
Because of the high flux concentration within arms 42 and 44, larger magnetic forces are generated at lower current levels resulting in more force generated at clip 21 to trip the latch mechanism (i.e., cam 14a). The added force is beneficial at low current trip settings (e.g., three times the rated current) where the low current is otherwise not enough to induce sufficient magnetic force on armature 18 to trip the latch system. For higher trip settings, however, this added force is not needed and may cause damage to the trip latch system. Therefore, the armature 18 is pivoted away from yoke 16, thereby increasing gap L until it is greater than gap z. With gap L greater than gap z, yoke 16 shunts the magnetic flux from yoke 16 onto itself because the flux seeks the path of least magnetic reluctance. Accordingly, the magnetic force of yoke 16 on armature 18 is reduced. However, a further reduction in magnetic force may be needed. To achieve this reduction, an amount of material is removed from armature 18 such that armature 18 does not saturate at low current settings (e.g., having a maximum flux density of approximately 1.9 T (BMAX) before saturation flux density (BSAT) of steel at 2.0 T) and saturates at high current settings. Because the armature does not saturate at low current settings, armature 18 does not affect the increase of the magnetically induced force due to the increased pole face area of flanges 46, 48 acting on cross beam component 62 at low current settings.
More specifically, the reluctance of a magnetic circuit is analogous to the resistance of an electric circuit. Reluctance depends on the geometrical and material properties of the circuit that offer opposition to the presence of magnetic flux. Reluctance of a given part of a magnetic circuit is proportional to its length and inversely proportional to its cross-sectional area and a magnetic property of the given material called its permeability (μ). Iron, for example, has an extremely high permeability as compared to air so that it has a comparatively small reluctance, or it offers relatively little opposition to the presence of magnetic flux. Thus, it will be appreciated that opposition to an increase in magnetic flux and hence reaching saturation, is optionally controlled by selecting the length and cross-sectional area of the magnetic path or selecting a material with a permeability that is near saturation when the gap is small and approaches saturation as the gap increases. The magnetic path length is defined by the width of armature 18 and a cross section area 63 of cross beam 62. Cross section area 63 of cross beam 62 is selected to obtain a reluctance that provides favorable magnetic properties at both small gaps L and large gaps L (i.e., first distances and second distances larger than first distances).
By setting the cross section area 63 based on low current requirements, armature 18 saturates at high current settings which results in a lower relative induced magnetic force. When an emanating magnetic field H permeates through a cross-section area of a medium (i.e., cross section area 63), it converts to magnetic flux density B according to the following formula: B magnetic flux density=μ H magnetic field where μ is the permeability of the medium. Flux density (B) is simply the total flux (φ) divided by the cross sectional area (Ae) of the part through which it flows—B=φ/Ae teslas
Initially, as current is increased the flux (φ) increases in proportion to it. At some point, however, further increases in current lead to progressively smaller increases in flux. Eventually, the armature 18 can make no further contribution to flux growth and any increase thereafter is limited to that provided by the permeability of free space (μ 0)—perhaps three orders of magnitude smaller. It will be appreciated that the missing material to form aperture 68 must be accounted for in the minimum cross sectional area (Ae) calculation for the flux density (B) in armature 18 cross beam component 62.
Turning to
Thus, the above described yoke-armature system having a yoke with inwardly facing flanges with a gap z therebetween provides the necessary torque to trip the latch mechanism at small gaps (low current setting), while providing a torque that remains virtually unchanged at larger gaps (high current setting).
It will be understood that a person skilled in the art may make modifications to the preferred embodiment shown herein within the scope and intent of the claims. While the present invention has been described as carried out in a specific embodiment thereof, it is not intended to be limited thereby but is intended to cover the invention broadly within the scope and spirit of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2824191 | Christensen | Feb 1958 | A |
3421123 | Laubenheimer et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
4719438 | Mrenna et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5250918 | Edds et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5381120 | Arnold et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5394126 | Grunert et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5670922 | Montague et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5870008 | Pannenborg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6194982 | Mrenna et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218920 | Reichard et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6636133 | Raabe et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
20030174033 | Daehler et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030197581 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |