The invention relates to a magnetic drive system for a switching device of the type specified in the precharacterizing clause of patent claim 1.
A bipolar drive system such as this is already known, for example, from DE 197 09 089 A1. The armature in this case is composed of a solid magnetic iron material which allows it to be manufactured at a lower cost than an armature composed of layers of electrical laminates, and it also frequently has longer long-term stability. In this context, the solid armature has the intrinsic disadvantage that, in comparison to armatures composed of layers of electrical laminates, more eddy current losses occur and the remanence is greater which, inter alia, makes it more difficult to release the switching contacts during switching processes. In order to reduce the eddy current losses, the armature is provided with elongated hollow channels which comprise narrow slots and extend in the forward-movement direction of the armature, and therefore in the direction of the magnetic lines of force. The slots which are provided on the narrow faces of the armature weaken the cuboid armature in this case over one-third of its cross-sectional width in each case, and over its entire length. Furthermore, a plurality of parallel slots are cut out alongside one another from the broad faces of the armature and do not extend over the entire length of the armature, but end at a distance from the end faces of the armature. However, the slots have a considerable adverse effect on the mechanical robustness of the armature overall. Provision is therefore made for the robustness of the armature to be further increased after introduction of the slots, by filling the slots with insulating material. However, in particular because these slots should be as narrow as possible, for technical reasons, the filling of the slots is technically correspondingly difficult and considerably increases the armature production costs.
In order to counter the greater remanence of the armature, it should be possible to adapt the junctions between the contact surface of the armature and the yoke laminates as required. Reducing the contact area admittedly leads to a better response in the sense of a shorter switching time, but this must be obtained at the expense of the disadvantage of a reduced armature holding force. Since, however, an excessively low armature holding force has a disadvantageous effect on the operational reliability of the magnetic drive system, the known drive system cannot comply with the design requirements for many applications.
The invention is therefore based on the object of further developing a magnetic drive system of the type specified in the precharacterizing clause of claim 1 in such a way that the robustness of the armature is not excessively reduced by its design to reduce the eddy current losses.
This object is achieved by the features of patent claim 1.
Advantageous refinements of the invention are the subject matter of the dependent claims.
The magnetic drive system according to the invention for a switching device has a magnet yoke in which a solid armature composed of magnetic material is guided such that it can move linearly between two opposite limit positions, and at least one permanent magnet for production of a magnetic flux in the magnet yoke, and at least one coil, by means of which the armature can be moved backward and forward between its limit positions, wherein the armature is provided with elongated channels in order to prevent eddy current losses, and the channels in the armature are closed all the way round on their circumference.
The arrangement of channels (hollow channels) which are closed all the way round in the armature results in a simple manner in the robustness of the armature being scarcely adversely affected. This avoids the need for the technically complex filling of the channels.
The channels which are incorporated in the armature preferably comprise holes with a relatively small hollow cross section. Holes such as these need not necessarily be circular but may also, for example, have an oval cross section. However, as far as possible, the hollow cross section should be configured such that there are no sharp corners on the circumferential wall which bounds the hollow cross section.
However, when holes are introduced retrospectively into the armature block, it is advantageous for the holes to be circular because they can then be produced at low cost by means of drills.
With respect to both the technical effect and from the production engineering point of view as well, it is advantageous for the holes in the armature actually to be through-holes. Alternatively, the holes may be in the form of blind holes, which are drilled from both side surfaces.
The technical effect of a gap in terms of reducing the eddy current losses can be achieved approximately by arranging a plurality of channels in a row in the armature a short distance apart to form a row of bore holes or a plurality of rows of holes. In this case, a plurality of rows of holes are expediently each aligned parallel to one another along a straight line.
It is particularly effective for those end faces of the armature block through which the armature guide rods pass to be connected via at least one row of holes or a plurality of parallel rows of holes, in particular two, three or four rows of holes, with these holes being through-holes which run parallel to the broad faces of the armature close to the hole for the armature guide rod. At least one further row of holes or a plurality of rows of holes, in particular two, three or four rows of holes, can be provided centrally between these rows of holes, extending along the center longitudinal plane of the armature, between its narrow faces.
A further technical improvement is achieved if the broad faces of the armature block are also perforated by a plurality of rows, largely of through-holes. In this case, two arrays of rows of holes can be arranged next to the lateral plane of the armature guide rod. If two armature guide rods are mounted in opposite blind holes in the armature, then an armature area which remains between the blind hole ends and is composed of solid material can additionally still be used for central arrangement of one through-hole.
The armature block, through which holes pass in all three spatial directions, ensures not only that the eddy current losses are reduced but also a considerable reduction in the remanence tendency. The remanence is reduced to an even greater extent if the opposing surfaces which interact with the stop surfaces of the armature are also each perforated by one row of holes, or in each case a plurality of rows of holes.
Overall, in comparison to the known system with slots as hollow channels, the magnet system has the advantage that the formation of eddy currents is impeded in all three axis directions, and is thus reduced. In this case, the operational reliability is maintained virtually without any restriction, since the holding force for the same total induction is reduced only insignificantly, and the remanent induction of the magnet circuit decreases at the same time.
The latter effect is essentially because the magnetic induction in the armature is only locally specifically increased into the saturation range, and the local permeability is thus reduced. Furthermore, the armature mass is reduced because of the numerous channels in the armature, thus resulting overall in less remanence associated with better dynamic characteristics of the armature and of the overall magnet system.
Further expedient refinements and advantages of the invention will become evident from the following description of one exemplary embodiment and with reference to the figures of the drawing, in which mutually corresponding components are provided with the same reference symbols, and in which:
A cuboid armature 8 is located in the yoke frame between the plane-parallel permanent magnets 6 and 7 and at a short distance from them and, in the illustrated position, rests on the mounting plate 5. The armature 8 also has two armature guide rods 9 which project centrally from the upper face and the lower face, respectively, of the armature block and are arranged geometrically coaxially with respect to one another. The armature guide rods 9 pass through a bearing hole 10 in the respective mounting plate 4 or 5 associated with them, with little circumferential play, and an end area of them projects out of the bearing hole 10 in their mounting plate 4 or 5, as a result of which the armature 8 can be moved linearly in the vertical direction by means of the guide rods 9. In conjunction with the pole limbs and the yoke limbs, the yoke frame would also be provided with two coils, whose magnetic field would move the armature 8 to its upper limit position, with an appropriate polarity direction, after overcoming its adhesion to the mounting plate 5, in which upper limit position its forward movement would be limited by impacting on the lower face of the mounting plate 4. After reversal of the polarity direction of the magnetic field, it will once again be forced down, after overcoming the adhesion by magnetic forces, to the illustrated limit position onto the mounting plate 5, and will be held in the contact position. The method of operation of magnet drives such as these is known per se, and will therefore not be described any further here.
In this case, the magnet yokes 2 and 3 comprise a multiplicity of thin yoke laminates which are joined to form the illustrated, thick yoke laminate stack. In contrast, the armature 8 and the mounting plates 4 and 5 are composed of blocks of ferromagnetic material of a known type, in particular of an appropriate iron alloy.
In order to reduce the eddy current losses and the remenance of the armature 8 and of the mounting plates 4 and 5, a multiplicity of channels (hollow channels) 11, 12 and 13 are integrated in the solid block of the armature 8 and in this case have a corresponding diameter of 2 mm to 3 mm, with them all being in the form of through-holes and differing only in terms of their length, since they pass through the block of the armature 8 in different directions. Alternatively, the channels 11, 12 and 13 may also be in the form of blind holes, which are drilled from both side surfaces.
As can be seen more clearly in conjunction with
The channels 13 are likewise introduced transversely with respect to the channels 11, but with a considerably greater number of them, and they all extend at right angles to the longitudinal center plane of the armature 8. In this case, the channels 13 originate from one broad face of the armature 8 and open into the opposite broad face. The hole pattern on the broad face in this case comprises two rectangular hole arrays which comprise three parallel rows of six hollow channels 13 each, with the hollow channels 13 in the row and at the side being at a corresponding distance from one another. These hole arrays are located on both sides of a central area of the armature 8, in which the armature guide rods 9 are arranged.
An individual channel 13′ is additionally arranged centrally between the two hole arrays composed of hollow channels 13, and likewise forms a through-hole connecting the broad faces. As can be seen from the front view shown in
In addition to the channels in the armature 8, channels 15 are also located in the mounting plates 4 and 5, and extend parallel to the axes of the channels 11. Of the channels (hollow channels) 15, there are two rows of six channels 15 each, which are preferably arranged congruent to the channels 11 in the armature 8.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2007 028 203.8 | Jun 2007 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP08/56751 | 6/2/2008 | WO | 00 | 12/8/2009 |