The disclosure relates to improvements in hardware for mounting percussion instruments, namely, acoustic and/or electronic drum suspension hardware.
Electronic percussion instruments are known as alternatives to acoustic drums or other percussion instruments. An electronic percussion instrument typically includes a trigger pad equipped with various sensors designed to sense the features (e.g., location, intensity, etc.) of the playing impact on the trigger pad. These sensors send a corresponding electronic signal via a wire to a sound module that produces synthesized or sampled percussion sounds based on the electronic signal, which sounds are played through speakers connected to the sound module.
Such electronic percussion instruments are known to be mechanically mounted on support structures, e.g., stands or kit frames, so that they may be played similarly to their corresponding acoustic instruments. However, problems arise due to this traditional mounting structure. First, is in that residual vibration from the playing/performing energy may be transferred to the support structure through the traditional ridged mounting hardware. This residual vibration causes interference with the propagating electronic signal, causing the signal to inaccurately reflect the features of the playing impact. The sound produced by the synthesizer is accordingly impacted. Second, the feel and stick response from the electronic trigger pad with ridged mounting structure, is significantly foreign to that of an acoustic drum mounted on a suspension system. Drumhead manufactures have made advancements to better emulate that of an acoustic drum feel and stick response, namely mesh head material. While this material improves the aforementioned feel characteristics, it still falls short of an acoustic drum and also introduced an undesirable trampoline stick response.
Problems also arise due to the traditional mounting of acoustic instruments on support structures. Again, residual vibration transferred to the support structure may negatively impact the sound properties of the acoustic instrument. Moreover, the sound quality may be further negatively impacted because, for traditional mounting, the acoustic boundary conditions vary significantly from mathematically pure boundary conditions due to the fixed nature and relatively static rigidity of traditional mounting. By way of explanation, mostly pure sound quality from a drum requires the drum to be essentially floating on air without any support. The presence of a support introduces a corresponding area that has a different acoustic boundary condition than areas where the support is not. This affects the acoustic properties of the drum and is equally fixed (non adjustable), thus results in a compromise to the feel and/or sonic property of the drum.
It is therefore desirable to provide advantages over such systems and further be able to control to the feel, stick response and sonic properties of the instrument. Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following more detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the presently described embodiments.
The above-described drawing figures illustrate the disclosed invention in at least one of its preferred, best mode embodiments, which are further defined in detail in the following description. Those having ordinary skill in the art may be able to make alterations and modifications to what is described herein without departing from its spirit and scope. While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail at least one preferred embodiment of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspects of the invention to any embodiment illustrated. Therefore, it should be understood that what is illustrated is set forth only for the purposes of example and should not be taken as a limitation on the scope of the disclosed invention.
A percussion instrument mount 10 comprises: a base 100 coupled to a swing arm 200 via a joint 300, the swing arm 200 configured to rotate about the joint 300 in response to a playing impact on a percussion instrument 20 coupled to the swing arm 200 via an instrument attachment mechanism 400; and a playing impact energy absorber 500 configured to absorb the rotation of the swing arm 200. The base 100 is also preferably coupled to a support structure 600, such as an instrument stand or kit frame, configured to support the percussion instrument 20 via the percussion instrument mount 10 on a playing surface, e.g., the ground or a stage.
The impact energy absorber 500 preferably absorbs the playing impact by progressively dampening the swing via magnetic field resistance. In particular, the respective strengths and locations of one or more magnets located in the percussion instrument mount 10 produce a magnetic field that defines an equilibrium position for the swing arm 200. Movement of the swing arm 200 away from the equilibrium position (e.g., due to playing impact) is resisted by the magnetic field, which provides a restoring force tending the swing arm 200 back towards the equilibrium position. Mechanical resistance or frictional resistance may also be provided, for example at various points of rotation, so as to dissipate the playing impact energy. Accordingly, playing impact energy transferred from the drum to the base 100 is significantly reduced, if not eliminated altogether.
Turning now to
The base 100 may comprise a first base portion 120 and a second base portion 140 having fixed relative positions with respect to each other. In particular, the first and second base portions may each comprise one or more grip elements 162 configured to secure the first and second base portions respectively to the support structure and/or an intermediate support 620.
The support structure and/or intermediate support preferably comprises at least one rod 640 having at least one longitudinal groove 642 formed therein and configured to accept a corresponding grip element 162 so as to form a sliding joint 160 via which the first and second bases are configured to slide longitudinally along the rod so as to adjust their relative positions with respect to the rod and each other. Moreover, in at least some embodiments, the first and second bases are able to be removably joined with the rod via the sliding joint 160. That is to say that first and second bases may be slid off of and on to the rod via engaging respective grip elements and grooves. In at least some embodiments, each groove and corresponding grip element together form a quasi-dovetail sliding joint, however, other sliding joints may be utilized without departing from the scope of the invention.
Each of the first and second base portions also preferably includes one or more fasteners configured to secure the first and second base portions to the support structure and/or intermediate support in respective fixed positions relative thereto. The fasteners may, for example, comprise threaded fasteners whose contact can be tightened and loosened via screwing and unscrewing the fastener so as to forcibly contact a wall of the support structure and/or intermediate support and thereby provide and remove a frictional staying force.
In some embodiments, the base 100 comprises a unitary base (not shown), including at least one corresponding grip element similarly configured to secure the base 100 to the support structure and/or the intermediate support.
The swing arm 200 may be a substantially rigid integral structure comprising: a first arm portion 220, a second arm portion 240, and a third arm portion 260 integrally connecting the first and second arm portions.
The first arm portion 220 is coupled to the first base portion 120 via the joint 300—and is thereby configured to swing or otherwise rotate about the joint 300 in response to the playing impact on the percussion instrument 20 coupled thereto.
As shown in
Accordingly, the hinge bolt 320 may further be provided with a deformable sheath 360 positioned between the outer surface of the hinge bolt 320 and the inner surface of the through-hole 340 of the first arm portion 220. To the extent alternative joint constructions are utilized, e.g., ball-and-socket joint, the deformable sheath 360 may engage appropriate pivot point structures of the joint 300.
A pressure exerting element 380 may extend through the first arm portion 220 substantially perpendicular to the through-hole 340 so as to engage with the sheath 360 and exert pressure thereon. This deforms the sheath 360 so as to adjust the frictional resistance to rotation of the hinge bolt 320. The pressure exerting element is preferably a threaded element (e.g., an Allen fastener, etc.) so as to enable control of the amount of pressure—and therefore frictional resistance—applied.
The third arm portion includes the instrument attachment mechanism 400, which is configured to attach the percussion instrument 20 to the swing arm 200. As shown in
The second arm portion 240 extends distal to the first arm portion 220, and at least partially forms the playing impact energy absorber 500. As shown in
The magnetic restoring force may be repulsive and/or attractive. Arrangement of the respective magnets of the magnet pairs such that their like polarities face each other provides a repulsive magnetic restoring force. In operation, the weight of the instrument causes the swing arm 200 to move the swing arm 200 magnet and base arm magnet closer together than when in the equilibrium position. The repulsive magnetic force then reestablishes the swing arm 200 in the equilibrium position. Arrangement of the respective magnets of the magnet pairs such that their unlike polarities face each other provides an attractive magnetic restoring force. In operation, the weight of the instrument causes the swing arm 200 to move the swing arm 200 magnet and base arm magnet further apart than when in the equilibrium position. The attractive magnetic force then reestablishes the swing arm 200 in the equilibrium position. Accordingly, movement of the swing arm 200 away from the equilibrium position (e.g., due to playing impact) is resisted by the magnetic field caused by the at least one magnet pair, which provides the restoring force tending the swing arm 200 back towards the equilibrium position.
In at least one embodiment, the relative distance between the respective magnets of the magnet pair in equilibrium is adjustable so as to vary the repulsive/attractive forces and/or the equilibrium position. For example, the base magnet may include an outer thread that couples with an inner thread of a magnet aperture of the base 100, and a turnkey portion that facilitates a screwing motion for extending or retracting the base magnet from the magnet aperture thus altering the magnetic field (e.g., work force values).
As shown, for example, in
The at least one rod preferably forms a frame on which the percussion instrument mount 10 (and consequently, the percussion instrument 20) is mounted. Accordingly, a plurality of rods may be coupled together at various joints, which joints may be configured to permit the rods to rotate about their longitudinal axis relative to each other. The joints may further be configured to fix the rotational position of each rod. In some embodiments, frictional elements (e.g., screws) are utilized at the joint to fix the rotational position of each rod. In this manner, the playing position of the mounted percussion instrument 20 may be further adjusted.
Turning now to
As shown in
The base 100 is further coupled to the swing arm 200 via the joint 300, which preferably comprises one or more hinge joints configured to permit the swing arm 200 to swing or otherwise rotate about the joint 300 in response to the playing impact on the percussion instrument 20 coupled thereto. The hinge joints may further provide mechanical resistance so as to dissipate playing impact energy.
The swing arm 200 further includes the instrument attachment mechanism 400, which is configured to attach the percussion instrument 20 to the swing arm 200. As shown in
In some embodiments (not shown) the instrument attachment mechanism 400 may be slideably coupled to the swing arm 200, either directly or via an intermediate piece, such that its longitudinal position relative to the swing arm 200 (i.e., along the z-axis) may be adjusted. Accordingly, corresponding grip elements may be utilized in the manner similarly discussed herein so as to achieve this functionality. The instrument attachment mechanism 400 may also permit rotational adjustment about the x-axis and/or the y-axis so as to adjust the playing angle and/or additionally rotate/invert the drum 180 degrees for tuning the opposing drum head of the instrument without disengaging the instrument from the attachment mechanism 400. Such adjustment may be mechanically enabled either via the direct coupling or the indirect coupling. In some embodiments, an intermediate piece is configured to couple the instrument attachment mechanism 400 to the swing arm 200, as well as to enable such adjustment.
The playing impact energy absorber 500 may comprise: a dampening arm 560 configured to rotate about an intermediate hinge point 562; a swing arm coupler 570 configured to couple the dampening arm 560 to the swing arm 200 at respective terminal hinge points 564 and 566; a magnet block 580 configured to provide the magnetic restoring force.
As shown in
The swing arm sleeve preferably defines a hollow that is configured to accept the swing arm 200 therein such that the sleeve may be repositioned along at least a portion of the length of the swing arm 200. Accordingly, in at least some embodiments, the swing arm 200 and swing arm sleeve employ a sliding joint configuration. It is further preferable that the position of the swing arm sleeve on the swing arm 200 is fixable via a fastener, e.g., a screw. In this manner, the bias of the dampening arm 560 may be adjusted so as to improve sound quality of the mounted instrument.
As shown in
As shown in
In operation the playing impact cases the swing arm 200 to rotate about the joint 300. The rotation of the swing arm 200 is then translated to the dampening arm 560 via the swing arm coupler 570, which dampening arm 560 is thereby caused to rotate about the intermediate hinge point defined by the third hinge structure. The rotation of the dampening arm 560 then forces the magnet block 580 out of the equilibrium position, which results in the magnet pair providing the restoring force to the magnet block 580. The restoring force is then translated through the corresponding counter-rotation of the dampening arm 560 and the swing arm 200. The joint 300, and optionally, one or more of the hinge structures provide mechanical and/or frictional resistance so as to further dissipate the playing energy.
As shown in
Turning now to
It will be understood that, although the illustrated embodiments shows hinge structures that enable the swing arm 200 swinging in a plane whereby the range of rotational motion sweeps out an arc with the second arm portion 240, the inventive concepts described herein are intended to also include alternative joint structures that permit alternative ranges of motion of swing arm 200, e.g., where the swing arm 200 sweeps out a spherical cap surface via e.g., a ball and socket joint or compound perpendicular hinge joint. Accordingly, such configurations would utilize appropriately positioned magnet pairs to set equilibrium positions and provide restorative forces. The extension of the inventive aspects described herein to such configurations is expressly contemplated.
Moreover, while the use of a magnetic restoring force is described herein, other restoring forces (e.g., spring forces, elastomer forces or combinations of dislike mechanical forces) and corresponding structures may be utilized without departing from the scope of the invention.
The enabled features described in detail above are considered novel over the prior art of record and are considered critical to the operation of at least one aspect of the invention and to the achievement of the objectives of the invention. The words used in this specification to describe the exemplary embodiments are to be understood not only in the sense of their commonly defined meanings, but also to include any special definition with regard to structure, material or acts that would be understood by one of ordinary skilled in the art to apply in the context of the entire disclosure.
The definitions of the words or drawing elements described herein are meant to include not only the combination of elements which are literally set forth, but all equivalent structures, materials or acts for performing substantially the same function in substantially the same way to obtain substantially the same result. In this sense it is therefore contemplated that an equivalent substitution of two or more elements may be made for any one of the elements described and its various embodiments or that a single element may be substituted for two or more elements in a claim without departing from the scope of the invention.
Changes from the claimed subject matter as viewed by a person with ordinary skill in the art, now known or later devised, are expressly contemplated as being equivalents within the scope intended and its various embodiments. Therefore, obvious substitutions now or later known to one with ordinary skill in the art are defined to be within the scope of the defined elements. This disclosure is thus meant to be understood to include what is specifically illustrated and described above, what is conceptually equivalent, what can be obviously substituted, and also what incorporates the essential ideas.
The scope of this description is to be interpreted in conjunction with the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/US18/13566, filed Jan. 12, 2018, which claims priority to applicant's Appl. No. 62/536,402, filed Jul. 24, 2017, and to Appl. No. 62/446,207, filed Jan. 13, 2017, the entire contents of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2245883 | Walberg | Jun 1941 | A |
3779618 | Soglia et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3780613 | Ludwig, Jr. | Dec 1973 | A |
4158980 | Gauger | Jun 1979 | A |
4188853 | Bills | Feb 1980 | A |
4334458 | Grauso | Jun 1982 | A |
4669349 | Hyakutake | Jun 1987 | A |
4753408 | Wailes | Jun 1988 | A |
4779509 | Weir | Oct 1988 | A |
5046700 | Hoshino | Sep 1991 | A |
5140889 | Segan | Aug 1992 | A |
5337645 | Johnston | Aug 1994 | A |
5520083 | Falkner, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5544561 | Isomi | Aug 1996 | A |
5600080 | Belli | Feb 1997 | A |
6102358 | McLeary | Aug 2000 | A |
6195839 | Patterson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6623015 | Schill et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
7960634 | Gauger | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8237038 | Gauger | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8242343 | Jones | Aug 2012 | B2 |
9293122 | Martin | Mar 2016 | B1 |
20050274854 | May | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20100307316 | Jones | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130000460 | Johnston | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20160217775 | May | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2018/013566, International Search Report (PCT/ISA/220 and PCT/ISA/210) dated Mar. 29, 2018, enclosing Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (PCT/ISA/237) (Ten (10) pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62536402 | Jul 2017 | US | |
62446207 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2018/013566 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 15872718 | US |