Magnetic field sensor using microelectromechanical system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6664786
  • Patent Number
    6,664,786
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 27, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 16, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) Device manufactured on a microscopic scale using integrated circuit techniques provides a sensitive magnetic field sensor by detecting motion caused by the Lorentz force produced by a current through a MEMS conductor. The resulting MEMS may be used as a component in a variety of devices including current sensors and proximity sensors.
Description




STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to sensors for detecting the presence and/or strength of a magnetic field and, in particular, to a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) device providing for such measurements.




A magnetic field can be detected by noting its influence on a magnetic material or a current carrying wire. The former technique is used in a compass; the latter technique describes the common D'Arsonval movement used in electrical meters.




A Hall effect sensor may be used in applications that require a more compact and rugged sensor. Hall effect sensors detect the drift of charge carriers in a semiconductor material in the presence of a magnetic field. This drift causes a transverse polarization of that semiconductor which can be detected as a voltage.




Hall effect sensors are currently used in a number of applications including, switches, proximity sensors and magnetometers.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides an alternative to the Hall effect sensor that is both rugged and small and promises improved sensitivity over, and more flexible implementation than the Hall effect sensor. In this regard, the invention provides a sensor constructed using a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) device, which may be mass-produced using integrated circuit techniques.




In the invention, a microscopic conductor extends between two terminals on a substrate and conducts a proof current. Deflection of the current carrying conductor under the influence of a magnetic field, caused by the Lorentz force, is measured by a detector coupled to the conductor to produce an output dependent on that deflection. The small size and mass of the flexible conductor make kilohertz or higher response speeds possible.




Generally, the output signal may be analog or digital depending on the selection of the detector and its processing circuitry. Optionally, the invention may include circuit elements providing the proof current on-board or the proof current may be supplied externally using a conventional current source. The flexible conductor may be a straight conductive segment for simple fabrication.




In one embodiment, a beam connects the flexible conductor to the detector and the beam and the flexible conductor may include a metalization layer on an insulating or semiconducting material. The metalization layer may be interrupted on the beam to provide electrical isolation between the detector and flexible conductor.




The detector may include a bias means producing a force resisting the Lorentz force on the flexible conductor. The bias means may be a mechanical element such as a MEMS spring or may be an electrical element such as an electrostatic, piezoelectric or thermal motor. The bias means may be either passive or active. If an electrical element is used, the invention may include a feedback circuit communicating with the bias means and responding to the output signal to vary a bias force resisting the Lorentz force on the flexible conductor. In this way, the bias means may receive feedback to provide improved linearity in the detection of magnetic fields.




In an alternative embodiment, the invention may include a compensation coil. A feedback circuit responding to the output signal may energize the compensation coil to oppose the crossing magnetic field. This approach provides the benefits of feedback without the need for an electrically actuable bias means, but with the need for a coil structure.




The invention may include a second flexible conductor and detector also producing an output signal and a combiner circuit combining the output signal from the first and second flexible conductors to reject detector signals not related to the strength of the crossing magnetic field B. The flexible conductors may be arranged to have countervailing current flows or may be oriented (in connection to their beams) in opposite directions so that the effect of environmental noise such as mechanical shock or vibration may be distinguished from the Lorentz forces.




The invention may further include a measurement conductor conducting a current to be measured and positioned adjacent to the flexible conductor so that the crossing magnetic field B is a magnetic field produced by the current through the measurement conductor. In this way, the present invention may be used to measure currents. A magnetic core may be used to concentrate the flux from the measurement conductor on the flexible conductor.




Alternatively, the invention may include a magnet providing the crossing magnetic field B and, in this way, may be employed as a proximity detector detecting distortions of the magnetic field caused by nearby ferromagnetic materials. The invention finds potential application in all applications currently served by Hall effect devices.




The foregoing features may not apply to all embodiments of the inventions and are not intended to define the scope of the invention, for which purpose claims are provided. In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which there is shown by way of illustration, a preferred embodiment of the invention. Such embodiment also does not define the scope of the invention and reference must be made therefore to the claims for this purpose.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a perspective, schematic representation of one embodiment of the magnetic sensor of the present invention showing orientation of the magnetic flux, the proof current and the resulting Lorentz force on a flexible conductor whose deflection is measured by a capacitive sensor;





FIG. 2

is a block diagram of the embodiment of

FIG. 1

using a flexible conductor coupled directly to a sensor;





FIG. 3

is a figure similar to that of

FIG. 2

showing the addition of a feedback circuit and a compensation coil to provide improved linearity to the device of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 4

is a figure similar to that of

FIG. 2

showing the addition of an electronically controllable bias device such as may be used for feedback without the need for an external compensation coil;





FIG. 5

is a block diagram similar to

FIG. 2

showing the use of two separate systems whose outputs are combined by a combiner circuit to distinguish between the Lorentz forces and external mechanical shock or vibration;





FIG. 6

is a top plan view of the embodiment of

FIG. 4

using one flexible conductor for responding to Lorentz forces, an electrostatic motor as the bias device, and a capacitive sensor element;





FIG. 7

is a perspective fragmentary view of

FIG. 11

showing an insulating segment connecting the flexible conductor to the beam leading to the bias device as is produced by a break in the metalization layer;





FIG. 8

is a perspective view of a simplified representation of a current sensor implemented with the invention in which magnetic fields induced about a measuring conductor are measured;





FIG. 9

is a simplified representation of a switch implemented with the invention in which a movable magnetic is detected;





FIGS. 10



a


and


10




b


are simplified representations of a proximity detector as implemented using the present invention to detect distortion of a magnetic field by the presence of nearby ferromagnetic material;





FIG. 11

is a top plan view of the embodiment of

FIG. 2

using one flexible conductor for responding to Lorentz forces and a capacitive sensor element;





FIG. 12

is a simplified perspective view of an insulating section of the beam of

FIG. 6

showing the use of laminated conductive and nonconductive layers and the removal of the conductive layer to create the insulating sections between sensing and biasing portions of the device; and





FIG. 13

is a perspective fragmentary view of

FIG. 11

showing an insulating layer separating the flexible conductor from a conductive beam in one portion of the beam and a metalization layer in direct contact with the beam in a second portion of the beam forming the detection device.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Non-Feedback System




Referring now to

FIGS. 1 and 2

, a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) magnetic field sensor


10


of the present invention provides a first terminal


22




c


and a second terminal


22




d


formed on a substrate such as of an integrated circuit but electrically insulated therefrom so that an electrical voltage may be established across the terminals


22




c


and


22




d


. In this regard, the substrate may be an insulator or have an insulating top layer so that conductive layers or wire bonding attached to these terminals are all mutually isolated. The substrate may provide for the support and fabrication of other integrated circuitry.




Terminals


22




c


and


22




d


are connected by a flexible conductor


46


, typically also formed on the substrate material, but separated from the substrate by undercutting so as to provide an unsupported span between terminals


22




d


and


22




c


free to flex generally along a longitudinal axis parallel to the plane of the integrated circuit substrate to form a bow


12


indicated by a dotted line. The flexible conductor


46


is positionable within a crossing magnetic field B generally perpendicular to the substrate plane so that a proof current i


p


passing from terminal


22




d


to


22




c


moves it to the bow


12


in response to Lorentz force F. The flexible conductor thus provides a Lorentz motor actuator device


36




a.






A beam


20


is attached to the center of the flexible conductor


46


and may include an insulating section


15


separating a first beam section


32




a


from a continuation beam section


32




b


. The beam section


32




b


may optionally be attached to a bias device


36




b


providing an additional restoring force tending to restore the flexible conductor


46


from the bow


12


to a straight configuration that compliments the naturally occurring restoring force of the flexible conductor itself. The bias device


36




b


, if used, may be either a physical or electrical device as will be described below. In addition, bias device


36




b


, if used, may be either passive or active.




Beam section


32




b


also supports moving capacitor plates


66


extending laterally from the beam section


32




b


along the plane of the substrate and having longitudinally extending fingers in a forward and backward direction interdigitating with opposed fingers of corresponding stationary capacitor plates


68


on opposite sides of the beam


20


. Two pairs of opposed capacitor plates


66


,


68


are thus formed, one of which moves closer together and one of which moves farther apart with motion of the beam


20


. The capacitor plates


66


,


68


provide a detector device


36




c.






The detector device


36




c


may further include a capacitive sensing circuit


73


such as is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/677,037, incorporated by reference, attached to a terminal


26




c


being common with moving capacitor plates


66


and also be attached to terminal


26




a


and


26




d


communicating with the two moving capacitor plates


66


, respectively. The capacitive sensing circuitry


73


may, but need not be implemented as integrated circuitry on or supported by the same substrate


42


as the (MEMS) magnetic field sensor


10


. Measurement of the change in capacitance detects longitudinal movement of the beam


20


and forms the basis of detector output


14


indicating movement of the beam section


32




b


and hence beam


20


and hence flexible conductor


46


.




For a fixed proof current i


p


and a restoring force from the stiffness of the flexible conductor observing Hook's law, movement of the beam section


32




b


will be proportional to the strength of the crossing magnetic field B and thus the detector output


14


will provide a measurement of the strength of the crossing magnetic field B. Control of the proof current i


p


will affect the relationship between the force F and the crossing magnetic field B thus allowing change in the sensitivity of the device. The detector output


14


may be an analog output or may be digitized according to methods well known in the art.




Specifically, referring now to

FIG. 11

, the beam


20


may extend above a substrate


42


along the longitudinal axis


40


between longitudinally opposed pylons


44


′. The beam


20


may thereby define a midline dividing transversely opposed pylons


44


, the latter attached and extending upward from a substrate


42


. The leftmost pylons


44


′ form the terminals


22




d


and


22




c


described above while the right most pylons


44


′ form terminals


26




c


. The transversely opposed pair of pylons


44


, provide terminals


26




a


and


26




d


described above.




The beam


20


is supported away from the substrate


42


and held for movement along the longitudinal axis


40


by means of flexible conductors


46


and


46


″ extending transversely on opposite sides of both ends of the beam


20


and its middle. The flexible conductors


46


and


46


″ extend transversely away from the beam


20


to elbows


48


removed from the beam


20


on each side of the beam


20


. The elbows


48


in turn connect to expansion compensators


50


, which return to be attached to the substrate


42


at a point near the beam


20


. The support structure and operation of the elbows is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/805,410 filed Mar. 13, 2001 and hereby incorporated by reference.




The flexible conductors


46


and


46


″ are connected to expansion compensators


50


which in turn provide electrical connections between each of the beam sections


32




a


and


32




b


and stationary electrical terminals. Specifically, the expansion compensators


50


, connected to either end of the leftmost flexible conductor


46


, connect to terminals


22




c


and


22




d


respectively. The expansion compensators


50


attached to rightmost flexible conductor


46


″ connect to terminal


26




c


of beam section


32




b.






The portion


32




a


of the beam


20


, such as forms part of the Lorentz motor actuator device


36




a


, is isolated by insulating section


15


from the beam portion


32




b


and thus a voltage imposed across terminals


22




c


and


22




d


provides a current through the flexible conductor


46


.




The beam segment


32




b


may have transversely outwardly extending, moving capacitor plates


66


overlapping with corresponding transversely inwardly extending stationary capacitor plates


68


attached to the pylons


44


′ supporting terminals


26




a


and


26




d


. The capacitor plates serve as a sensing means in which variation in the capacitance between the moving capacitor plates


66


and stationary capacitor plates


68


serves to indicate the position of the beam


20


. Each of the moving capacitor plates


66


and their corresponding stationary capacitor plates


68


may have mutually engaging fingers (as opposed to being simple parallel plate capacitors) so as to provide for a more uniform capacitance variation over a greater range of longitudinal travel of the beam


20


. In this regard, the order of the stationary and moving capacitor plates


66


and


68


is reversed on opposite sides of the beam


20


. Thus, the moving capacitor plates


66


are to the right of the stationary capacitor plates


68


on a first side of the beam (the upper side as depicted in

FIG. 11

) whereas the reverse order occurs on the lower side of the beam


20


. Accordingly as the beam


20


moves to the right, the capacitance formed by the upper moving capacitor plates


66


and stationary capacitor plates


68


decreases while the capacitance formed by the lower plates increases. The point where the value of the upper capacitance crosses the value of the lower capacitance precisely defines a null point and is preferably set midway in the travel of the beam


20


. The moving capacitor plates


66


are connected to beam portion


32




b


and thus connected to terminals


26




c


. The stationary capacitor plates


68


are connected to terminals


26




a


and


26




d


respectively. Capacitor plates


66


and


68


are cantilevered over the substrate


42


by the same under etching used to free the beam


20


from the substrate


42


.




Techniques for comparing capacitance well known in the art may be used to evaluate the position of the beam


20


. One circuit for providing extremely accurate measurements of these capacitances is described in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/677,037 filed Sep. 29, 2000 and hereby incorporated by reference.




Generally, the operating structure of the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


is constructed to be symmetric about an axis through the middle of the beam


20


along the longitudinal axis


40


such as to better compensate the thermal expansions. In addition, the operating area of the plates of the capacitors, plates


66


and


68


on both sides of the beam


20


for the sense device


36




c


are made equal so as to be balanced. For similar reasons, beam


20


is attached to the center of the flexible conductor


46


.




The embodiment depicted in

FIGS. 1

,


2


, and


11


is suitable for providing a binary output such as may be suitable for a switch or the like or an analog output. However, the later analog output may be affected by nonlinearities in the Lorentz Force motor


36




a


or detector device


36




c


or other source, particularly for larger displacements. These nonlinearities may be reduced by implementing a feedback system.




Feedback System




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, in a feedback system, the detector output


14


is provided to a comparison circuit


16


, which provides a output signal


18


. The output signal


18


may serve as a new output and is also provided through feedback block


99


to a compensation coil


21


arranged to produce a countervailing magnetic flux B


c


oriented to nullify the crossing magnetic field B at the flexible conductor


46


. The feedback operates to return the flexible conductor


46


to its relaxed state thus eliminating the nonlinear effects incident to bowing of the flexible conductor


46


and gross movements of the beam


20


.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, the need for a compensation coil


21


may be eliminated by the addition of an electrically controlled bias device


36




b


interposed between the Lorentz motor actuator device


36




a


and the detector device


36




c


. Specifically, Lorentz motor actuator device


36




a


may connect via beam segment


32




a


through insulating section


15


to beam segment


32




c


connected to the bias device


36




b


. Beam section


32




c


may then connect through insulating section


17


to beam segment


32




b


, which connects to the detector device


36




c


as has been described. The bias device


36




b


may be an electrostatic motor as will be described below, although other bias devices may also be used.




Specifically, referring now to

FIG. 6

, the beam


20


may extend above a substrate


42


along the longitudinal axis


40


between longitudinally opposed pylons


44


′. The beam


20


may thereby define a midline dividing transversely opposed pylons


44


′, the latter attached and extending upward from a substrate


42


. The leftmost pylons


44


′ form the terminals


22




d


and


22




c


described above while the right most pylons


44


′ form terminals


26




c


. One transversely opposed pair of pylons


44


, positioned to the right side of the beam


20


, provide terminals


26




a


and


26




d


described above while a second transversely opposed pair of pylons


44


roughly centered on the beam


20


provide terminals


38




c


and


38




d


being part of the electrically controlled bias device


36




b.






The beam


20


is supported away from the substrate


42


and held for movement along the longitudinal axis


40


by means of flexible conductors


46


and


46


″ extending transversely on opposite sides of both ends of the beam


20


and its middle. The flexible conductors


46


and


46


″ extend transversely away from the beam


20


to elbows


48


removed from the beam


20


on each side of the beam


20


. The elbows


48


in turn connect to expansion compensators


50


, which return to be attached to the substrate


42


at a point near the beam


20


. The support structure and operation of the elbows is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/805,410 referred to above.




The flexible conductors


46


,


46


′ and


46


″ are connected to expansion compensators


50


which in turn provide electrical connections between each of the beam sections


32




a


,


32




b


and


32




c


and stationary electrical terminals. Specifically, the expansion compensators


50


connected to either end of the leftmost flexible conductor


46


connect to terminals


22




c


and


22




d


respectively. The expansion compensators


50


connected to the middle flexible conductor


46


′ provide an electrical connection between beam section


32




c


and terminal


38




a


. The expansion compensators


50


attached to rightmost flexible conductor


46


″ connect to terminal


26




c


to beam section


32




b.






The portion


32




a


of the beam


20


, such as forms part of the Lorentz motor actuator device


36




a


, is isolated by insulating section


15


from the beam portion


32




c


and thus a voltage imposed across terminals


22




c


and


22




d


provides a current through the flexible conductor


46


.




The beam segment


32




c


may have transversely outwardly extending, moving capacitor plates


66


overlapping with corresponding transversely inwardly extending stationary capacitor plates


68


attached to the pylons


44


supporting terminals


38




c


and


38




d


. Stationary capacitor plates


68


are leftward of moving capacitor plates


66


on both sides of the beam


20


. Each of the moving capacitor plates


66


and their corresponding stationary capacitor plates


68


may have mutually engaging fingers (as opposed to being simple parallel plate capacitors) so as to provide for a more uniform electrostatic force over a greater range of longitudinal travel of the beam


20


. An electrostatic motor is thus formed using the attraction between the stationary capacitor plates


68


charged via terminals


38




c


and


38




d


and moving capacitor plate


66


charged via terminal


38




a


to urge the beam


20


leftward. It will be understood from this description that if rightward movement of beam


20


is desired then the left/right order of


68


/


66


plates can be reversed Capacitor plates


66


and


68


are cantilevered over the substrate


42


by the same under etching used to free the beam


20


from the substrate


42


.




Referring still to

FIG. 6

, portion


32




b


of the beam


20


, isolated from beam portion


32




c


by insulating section


17


also supports moving capacitor plates


66


and stationary capacitor plates


68


. However as mentioned above, in this case, the capacitor plates do not serve the purpose of making an electrostatic motor but instead serve as a sensing means in which variation in the capacitance between the moving capacitor plates


66


and stationary capacitor plates


68


serves to indicate the position of the beam


20


. In this regard, the order of the stationary and moving capacitor plates


66


and


68


is reversed on opposite sides of the beam


20


. Thus, the moving capacitor plates


66


are to the right of the stationary capacitor plates


68


on a first side of the beam (the upper side as depicted in

FIG. 6

) whereas the reverse order occurs on the lower side of the beam


20


. Accordingly as the beam


20


moves to the right, the capacitance formed by the upper moving capacitor plates


66


and stationary capacitor plates


68


decreases while the capacitance formed by the lower plates increases. The point where the value of the upper capacitance crosses the value of the lower capacitance precisely defines a null point and is preferably set midway in the travel of the beam


20


. The moving capacitor plates


66


are connected to beam portion


32




b


and thus connected to terminals


26




c


. The stationary capacitor plates


68


are connected to terminals


26




a


and


26




d


respectively.




Techniques for comparing capacitance well known in the art may be used to evaluate the position of the beam


20


. One circuit for providing extremely accurate measurements of these capacitances is described in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/677,037 filed Sep. 29, 2000 and hereby incorporated by reference.




Generally, the operating structure of the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


is constructed to be symmetric about an axis through the middle of the beam


20


along the longitudinal axis


40


such as to better compensate the thermal expansions. In addition, the operating area of the plates of the capacitors, plates


66


and


68


on both sides of the beam


20


for the bias device


36




b


are made equal so as to be balanced. For similar reasons, beam


20


is attached to the center of the flexible conductor


46


.




Referring again to

FIG. 4

, the detector output


14


of the detector device


36




c


and capacitive sensing circuit


73


may again be received by a comparison circuit


16


to produce output signal


18


. This output signal


18


is then passed through feedback block


99


and connected to terminals


38




c


and


38




d


and


38




a


so that rightward movement of the beam


20


produces a greater attraction between stationary plates


68


and moving capacitor plates


66


creating an opposite leftward force on the beam. This feedback provides a linearizing of the response of the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


according to principles well known in the art.




The electrically controllable bias device


36




b


may also be used to create a spring-like effect (although one not observing Hooke's law) by imposing a constant voltage across terminals


38




c


and


38




d


and terminal


38




a


. Thus it can be used to compliment the naturally occurring restoring spring force of the flexible conductor itself of the configuration of

FIGS. 1

,


2


, and


11


.




In yet another embodiment, the feedback current may be directed directly to a Lorentz motor to counteract or control the proof current i


p


going therethrough so long as a residual biasing field B


b


(not shown) is provided. B


b


is oriented to augment the incident magnetic field to be measured.




Referring for example, to

FIG. 11

, a simple feedback system can be implemented in this way by controlling the proofing current i


p


as a function of displacement of the beam


20


detected by the detector device


36




c


. The capacitive sensing circuit


73


is used to provide a feedback signal holding the beam at it's neutral position against some mechanical biasing force. For example, with a 20 mA proof current and a residual magnetic field B


b


the feedback is some predetermined value holding the beam


20


at the neutral position. As a magnetic field is applied the beam


20


displaces from neutral causing a negative feedback. This negative feedback subtracts from the proof current ip so as to bring the beam


20


back to neutral. The open loop gain in the system establishes the neutral beam error position and the feedback is a measure of the impinging field. No extra beam or coil is needed to affect the feedback. Generally (B+B


b


)·i


p


=Output.




Referring now to

FIG. 7

, flexible conductor


46


may be constructed using integrated circuit techniques in three layers, a lower semiconductor layer


60


such as silicon topped by an insulator


62


, for example, silicon dioxide, in turn, topped by metalization layer


64


such as aluminum.




The same structure may be carried onto beam section


32




b


of FIG.


11


and the insulating section


15


between beam sections


32




a


and


32




b


may be created by etching away the metalization layer


64


alone. A similar approach may be used for the insulating section


17


between beam portions


32




c


and


32




b


of FIG.


9


.




Referring now to

FIG. 11

, in an alternative embodiment, the insulating section


15


between the detector device


36




c


and the Lorentz motor


36




a


uses a different technique which incurs direct metal to silicon contact within


36




c


to take advantage of the total height of the silicone structure in creating opposed capacitor plates. Accordingly, referring to

FIG. 13

, the structure is much the same as described above as depicted in

FIG. 7

, with the exception that the insulating layer


62


is removed from the regions of beam section


32




b


and detector device


36




c


prior to the deposition of the metalization layer


64


. As a result, the metal is deposited directly onto layer


60


in these regions.




Referring again to

FIGS. 6 and 12

, in an alternative embodiment, the insulating section


17


between the detector device


36




c


and the biasing device


36




b


uses a different technique which incurs direct metal to silicon contact to take advantage of the total height of the silicon structure in creating opposed capacitor plates but at insulating sections


17


the beam


20


expands to create T-bars


56


flanking insulating section


17


. Insulating material


58


attached to these T-bars


56


create the insulating section


17


. Generally the beam


20


may be fabricated using well-known integrated circuit processing techniques to produce a structure suspended above the substrate


42


and composed of a laminated upper conductive layer


60


(for example, polysilicon or crystalline silicon) optionally with an upper aluminum layer


64


(not shown) and a lower insulating layer


62


such as silicon dioxide or silicon nitride. The insulating section


17


is created simply by etching away the upper layer in the region of the insulating section


17


according to techniques well-known in the art using selective etching techniques.




Each of the upper conductive layers


60


and lower insulating layers


62


are perforated by vertically extending channels


65


such as assists in conducting etchant beneath the layers


60


and


62


to remove a sacrificial layer that normally attaches layers


60


and


62


to the substrate


42


below according to techniques well known in the art.




The technique used to make insulating section


17


may also be used for insulating section


15


in

FIGS. 6 and 11

.




Referring now to

FIG. 5

, the Lorentz motor actuator device


36




a


and detector device


36




c


of MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


may be teamed with a MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


′ having a Lorentz motor actuator device


36




a


′ and detector device


36




c


′ each receiving the same proof current i


p


, but arranged so that the Lorentz force on the second MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


′ is in the opposite direction from the Lorentz force on the first MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


for a given crossing magnetic field B. This may be accomplished in a number of ways: as shown by making device


10


′ a mirror image of device


10


(and reversing the sense of the proof current i


p


as shown), or by using the same orientations of beams


20


and


20


′ and opposite currents and reversed biasing devices. The two detector output signals


14


and


14


′ are then combined by combiner


63


, which serves to double the Lorentz force signal components of the outputs


14


and


14


′ and to nullify common mode mechanical shock and vibration components. Other variations of this approach described in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/805,410 referred to above.




Referring now to

FIG. 8

, the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


may be placed adjacent to a current measuring conductor


70


conducting a test current i to produce a flux field orbiting the conductor


70


according to the right hand rule. A flux-concentrating core


72


may be placed coaxially around the conductor


70


to channel the flux through a gap


74


in the core


72


in which the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


is placed. The flux in the gap, which originates from the conductor


70


, then becomes the crossing magnetic field B. In this way, the current measuring capabilities of the present invention may be harnessed to provide for current measurement in the conductor


70


. From this description, it will be understood that other core and conductor configurations may be used including those in which the conductor


70


is wrapped in coils or the like, possibly around the core


72


and where the compensation coil


21


of

FIG. 3

is wrapped around the core


72


.




Referring now to

FIG. 9

, a switch


80


may be constructed in which the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


is placed in proximity to a permanent magnet


82


mounted to a movable operator


84


biased toward or away from the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


with springs


86


so that movement of the operator


84


causes movement of the magnet


82


changing the magnetic field imposed on the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


. In this case, the bias device


36




b


may be given with a constant predetermined bias amount so that a predetermined flux of crossing magnetic field B is required to cause a switching that may be sensed by the detector device


36




c


or a threshold may be established with a comparator


16


such as shown in

FIG. 3

or


4


, with or without feedback


18


. If feedback


18


is used it may be positive feedback so as to establish hysteresis according to methods understood in the art. Once the switch position changes the positive feedback would cause the beam


20


to remain in position, until some large offsetting field or another electrostatic motor caused it to go back to starting position.




Referring now to

FIG. 10

, the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


may be used in conjunction with a magnet structure


88


providing a crossing magnetic field B for the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


. Motions of a nearby ferromagnetic object


90


causing distortion of the crossing magnetic field B may be thus detected by the MEMS magnetic field sensor


10


to produce a proximity switch.




It is specifically intended that the present invention not be limited to the embodiments and illustrations contained herein, but that modified forms of those embodiments including portions of the embodiments and combinations of elements of different embodiments also be included as come within the scope of the following claims. For example, the biasing device may be a thermal, piezoelectric or other electrically controllable MEMS element and the detector device may be other forms of detectors such as optical detectors, resistive detectors, piezoelectric detectors, inductive detectors and the like.



Claims
  • 1. A microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensor providing magnetic field measurement, the sensor comprising:a substrate supporting a first and second terminal; a flexible conductor extending between the first and second terminals and positionable within a crossing magnetic field, the flexible conductor providing a path of conduction of a substantially constant current between the first and second terminals; a beam connected to the flexible conductor for communication of displacement of the flexible conductor; and a detector connected to the beam for detecting the Lorentz force deflection of the flexible conductor, the detector generating an output signal dependent on this force and thus on the strength of the crossing magnetic field, wherein at least a portion of the beam is insulating to electrically isolate the detector from the flexible conductor.
  • 2. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a proof current source communicating with the first and second terminals to provide a predetermined proof current through the flexible conductor.
  • 3. The MEMS detector of claim 1 wherein the flexible conductor is substantially straight.
  • 4. The MEMS detector of claim 3 wherein the flexible conductor is less than one millimeter long.
  • 5. The MEMS detector of claim 1 wherein the flexible conductor is a conductive layer on an insulating material and wherein the conductive layer is interrupted on the beam passing to the detector.
  • 6. The MEMS detector of claim 5 wherein the conductive layer is selected from the group consisting of a metal, a semiconductor and a combination of metal and semiconductor.
  • 7. The MEMS detector of claim 1 wherein the substrate further supports integrated circuitry.
  • 8. The MEMS detector of claim 1 wherein the detector is selected from the group consisting at variable gap capacitors, optical detectors, resistive detectors, piezoelectric detectors and inductive detectors.
  • 9. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a bias means communicating with the flexible conductor and producing a bias force resisting the Lorentz force of the flexible conductor.
  • 10. The MEMS detector of claim 9 wherein the bias means receives an electrical signal to control the bias source.
  • 11. The MEMS detector of claim 10 wherein the bias source is selected from the group consisting of an electrostatic motor, a thermal motor, and a piezoelectric motor.
  • 12. The MEMS detector of claim 9 wherein the bias source is a flexible element.
  • 13. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a bias means communicating with the flexible conductor and producing a bias force augmenting the Lorentz force of the flexible conductor.
  • 14. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a feedback circuit communicating with the bias means and responding to the output signal to vary the force resisting the Lorentz force of the flexible conductor.
  • 15. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a feedback circuit communicating with the bias means and responding to the output signal to vary the force augmenting the Lorentz force of the flexible conductor.
  • 16. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a compensation coil and a feedback circuit responding to the output signal to energize the compensation coil to oppose the crossing magnetic field.
  • 17. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including magnetic field biasing means and a feedback circuit wherein the feedback circuit modifies the current in the flexible conductor.
  • 18. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including:a third and fourth terminal supported by the substrate; a second flexible conductor extending between the third and fourth terminals and generally parallel with the first flexible conductor and positionable within the crossing magnetic field, the flexible conductor providing a path of conduction of a current between the third and fourth terminals; a second detector communicating with the second flexible conductor for detecting Lorentz deflection force of the second flexible conductor, the second detector generating a second output signal dependent on this force and thus on the strength of the crossing magnetic field; and a combiner circuit combining the first and second output signals to reject detector signals not related to the strength of the crossing magnetic field.
  • 19. The MEMS device of claim 18 further including a proof current source communicating with the first, second, third and fourth terminals to provide for opposite currents in the first and second flexible conductors.
  • 20. The MEMS device of claim 18 wherein the first and second output signals are of opposite polarity with Lorentz deflection force of the first and second flexible conductors.
  • 21. The MEMS detector of claim 1 wherein the output signal is an analog signal.
  • 22. The MEMS detector of claim 1 wherein the output signal is a digital signal.
  • 23. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a measurement conductor for conducting a current to be measured therethrough, the measurement conductor position adjacent to the flexible conductor whereby the crossing magnetic field is a magnetic field produced by the current to be measured;whereby the output signal provides an indication of the current to be measured.
  • 24. The MEMS detector of claim 23 further including a magnetic core concentrating the flux from the measurement conductor to impinge on the flexible conductor.
  • 25. The MEMS detector of claim 24 further including a compensation coil and a feedback circuit responding to the output signal to energize the compensation coil to oppose the crossing magnetic field wherein the compensation coil couples to the magnetic core.
  • 26. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a magnet providing a predetermined crossing magnetic field.
  • 27. The MEMS detector of claim 1 further including a switch operator movable to vary the crossing magnetic field;whereby the output signal may provide a switch signal indicating movement of the switch operator.
  • 28. The MEMS detector of claim 27 wherein the operator is attached to a permanent magnet.
  • 29. A method of sensing a magnetic field using a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) comprising the steps of:positioning a flexible MEMS conductor between a first and second terminal within a crossing magnetic field; applying a proof current to the flexible MEMS conductor to generate a Lorentz force on the flexible conductor; employing a beam connecting the flexible conductor to a detector for communication of displacement of the flexible conductor to the detector, wherein the beam includes an insulating portion; and detecting Lorentz force induced deflection of the flexible MEMS conductor to generate an output signal dependent on the Lorentz force and thus on the strength of the crossing magnetic field.
  • 30. The method of claim 29 wherein the proof current is constant.
  • 31. The method of claim 29 wherein the flexible conductor is substantially straight.
  • 32. The method of claim 29 wherein the step of detecting a Lorentz deflection of the flexible conductor employs a detector is selected from the group consisting of variable gap capacitors, optical detectors resistive detectors, inductive detectors and piezoelectric detectors.
  • 33. The method of claim 29 further including the step of imposing a bias force on the flexible conductor resisting the Lorentz force.
  • 34. The method of claim 29 further including the step of imposing a bias force on the flexible conductor augmenting the Lorentz force.
  • 35. The method of claim 34 wherein the bias force is proportional to the Lorentz force.
  • 36. The method of claim 34 wherein the bias force is proportional to deflection of the flexible conductor.
  • 37. The method of claim 29 further including a compensation coil and including the step of energizing the compensation coil to neutralize the crossing magnetic field at the flexible conductor.
  • 38. The method of claim 29 further including the steps ofpositioning a second flexible MEMS conductor between a third and fourth terminal within the crossing magnetic field; applying a proof current to the second flexible MEMS conductor; detecting a Lorentz force induced deflection of the second flexible MEMS conductor to generate a second output signal dependent on the Lorentz force and thus on the strength of the crossing magnetic field; and combining the first and second output signals to reject detector signals not related to the strength of the crossing magnetic field.
  • 39. The method of claim 38 wherein the step of applying the proof current to the first and second flexible MEMS conductors applies the proof currents in opposite directions.
  • 40. The method of claim 38 wherein the first and second output signals are of opposite polarity with Lorentz deflection force of the first and second flexible MEMS conductors.
  • 41. The method of claim 38 further including the step of concentrating the flux from the measurement conductor to impinge on the flexible conductor through a magnetic core.
  • 42. The method of claim 41 further including the step of coupling a compensation coil to the magnetic core and using a feedback circuit responding to the output signal to energize the compensation coil.
  • 43. The method of claim 29 wherein the output signal is an analog signal.
  • 44. The method of claim 29 wherein the output signal is a digital signal.
  • 45. The method of claim 29 further including the step of positioning a measurement conductor for conducting a current to be measured therethrough adjacent to the flexible conductor whereby the crossing magnetic field is a magnetic field produced by the current to be measured;whereby the output signal provides an indication of the current to be measured.
  • 46. A microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensor providing magnetic field measurement, the sensor comprising:a substrate supporting a set of pylons; a beam supported above the substrate by at least two pairs of opposing flexible arms extending transversely to the pylons on opposites sides of the beam; a flexible conductor supported by one pair of opposing flexible arms extending between first and second terminals on corresponding opposed pylons, the flexible conductor positionable within a crossing magnetic field to provide a path of conduction of a current between the first and second terminals; an actuator device communicating with the flexible conductor via the beam to provides a biasing force against a Lorentz force acting on the flexible conductor, and a detector communicating with the actuator for detecting the biasing force.
  • 47. The microelectromechanical (MEMS) sensor of claim 46, wherein at least a portion of the beam is insulating.
  • 48. The microelectromechanical (MEMS) sensor of claim 46, wherein the detector is electrically isolated from the flexible conductor.
  • 49. The microelectromechanical (MEMS) sensor of claim 46, wherein the actuator is electrically isolated from the detector.
  • 50. The microelectromechanical (MEMS) sensor of claim 46, wherein the Lorentz force is dependent upon the strength of the crossing magnetic field.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This case claims the benefit of provisional application Serial No. 60/308,714 filed Jul. 30, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (71)
Number Name Date Kind
3886447 Tanaka May 1975 A
4560953 Bozio Dec 1985 A
5012207 Edwards Apr 1991 A
5025346 Tang et al. Jun 1991 A
5194819 Briefer Mar 1993 A
5243861 Kloeck et al. Sep 1993 A
5343157 Deschamps Aug 1994 A
5359893 Dunn Nov 1994 A
5413668 Aslam et al. May 1995 A
5417312 Tsuchitani et al. May 1995 A
5424650 Frick Jun 1995 A
5491604 Nguyen et al. Feb 1996 A
5536988 Zhang et al. Jul 1996 A
5563343 Shaw et al. Oct 1996 A
5572057 Yamamoto et al. Nov 1996 A
5578976 Yao Nov 1996 A
5585311 Ko Dec 1996 A
5600190 Zettler Feb 1997 A
5646432 Iwaki et al. Jul 1997 A
5658698 Yagi et al. Aug 1997 A
5761350 Koh Jun 1998 A
5783340 Farino et al. Jul 1998 A
5798283 Montague et al. Aug 1998 A
5804314 Field et al. Sep 1998 A
5815051 Hamasaki et al. Sep 1998 A
5834864 Hesterman et al. Nov 1998 A
5877038 Coldren et al. Mar 1999 A
5903380 Motamedi et al. May 1999 A
5920978 Koshikawa et al. Jul 1999 A
5943155 Goossen Aug 1999 A
5955932 Nguyen et al. Sep 1999 A
5959516 Chang et al. Sep 1999 A
5995688 Aksyuk et al. Nov 1999 A
6035714 Yazdi et al. Mar 2000 A
6046066 Fang et al. Apr 2000 A
6060336 Wan May 2000 A
6071426 Lee et al. Jun 2000 A
6094102 Chang et al. Jul 2000 A
6100477 Randall et al. Aug 2000 A
6114794 Dhuler et al. Sep 2000 A
6116756 Peeters et al. Sep 2000 A
6127767 Lee et al. Oct 2000 A
6137206 Hill Oct 2000 A
6144545 Lee et al. Nov 2000 A
6149190 Galvin et al. Nov 2000 A
6159385 Yao et al. Dec 2000 A
6170332 MacDonald et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188322 Yao et al. Feb 2001 B1
6232150 Lin et al. May 2001 B1
6232841 Bartlett et al. May 2001 B1
6232847 Marcy, 5th et al. May 2001 B1
6236281 Nguyen et al. May 2001 B1
6257705 Silverbrook Jul 2001 B1
6265238 Yaji et al. Jul 2001 B1
6307169 Sun et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316278 Jacobsen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6348788 Yao et al. Feb 2002 B1
6356378 Huibers Mar 2002 B1
6356689 Greywall Mar 2002 B1
6373682 Goodwin-Johansson Apr 2002 B1
6384353 Huang et al. May 2002 B1
6391742 Kawai May 2002 B2
6400009 Bishop et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411214 Yao et al. Jun 2002 B1
6417743 Mihailovich et al. Jul 2002 B1
6463339 Vasko Oct 2002 B1
6465929 Levitan et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466005 Yao et al. Oct 2002 B1
6497141 Turner et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504356 Yao et al. Jan 2003 B2
20020017132 McNie et al. Feb 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0 665 590 Aug 1995 EP
0 711 029 May 1996 EP
0 763 844 Mar 1997 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (22)
Entry
Toumazou, C. et al., n-step Charge Injection Cancellation Scheme for Very Accurate Switched Current Circuits, Electronic Letters, v.30 (9) 680-681: 1994.
Emmerich, H., et al., A Novel Micromachined Magnetic-Field Sensor, MEMS 99 IEEE Conference, Jan. 17-21, 1999, IEEE Catalog No. 99ch36291c.
Madou, Marc, Fundamentals of Microfabrication, Chapters 2-4, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL: 1997.
Kovacs, Gregory T.A., Micormachined Transducers Sourcebook, Table of Contents, pp. 77-119 and Index, WCB McGraw-Hill, U.S.A.: 1998.
Teegarden, Darrell et al., How to Model and Simulate Microgyroscope Systems, IEEE Spectrum, 66-75, Jul. 1998.
Emmerich, Harald et al., Magnetic Field Measurements with a Novel Surface Micromachined Magnetic-Field Sensor, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, v. 47 (5) 972-977, May 2000.
McGruer, N.E. et al., Electrostatically Actuated Microswitches; Scaling Properties, Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, Jun. 8-11, 1998, pp. 132-135.
Miyajima, Hiroshi et al., High-Aspect-Ratio Photolithography for MEMS Applications, J. of Microelectromechanical Sys., v.4(4) 220-229, Dec. 1995.
Lu, Crist et al., A Monolithic Surface Micromachined Accelerometer with Digital Output, IEEE J. of Solid State Circuits, v. 30 (12) 1367-1373, Dec. 1995.
Chen, Ming-Jer et al., Weak Inversion Charge Injection in Analog MOS Switches, IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits, v. 30 (5) 604-606, May 1995.
Lemkin, Mark. A. et al., A Fully Differential Lateral S? Accelerometer with Drift Cancellation Circuitry, Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head, South Carolina, Jun. 2-6, 1996, pp. 90-93.
Boser, Bernhard E. et al., Surface Micromachined Accelerometers, IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits, v. 31 (3) 366-375, Mar. 1996.
Fedder, Gary K. et al., Multimode Digital Control of a Suspended Polysilicon Microstructure, J. of Microelectromechanical Sys., V. 5 (4) 283-297, Dec. 1996.
Noriega, Gerardo, Sigma-Delta A/D Converters-Audio and Medium Bandwidths, Technical Notes-DT3 from RMS Instruments website: www.rmsinst.com, 6 pages, Feb. 1996.
Internet page: Decimator Filter DLL, NeuroDimension Inc.: www.nd.com , May 31, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No.: 09/406,654, filed on Sep. 27, 1999.
U.S. patent application Ser. No.: 09/400,125, filed on Sep. 21, 1999.
U.S. patent application Ser. No.: 09/406,509, filed on Sep. 28, 1999.
U.S. patent application Ser. No.: 09/955,493, filed on Sep. 18, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No.: 09/955,494, filed on Sep. 18, 2001.
U.S. patent application Ser. No.: 09/675,861, filed on Sep. 29, 2000.
Storment, C.W., et al. “Flexible, Dry-Released Process for Aluminum Electrostatic Actuators.” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 3(3), Sep. 1994, pp. 90-96.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/308714 Jul 2001 US