The field of this invention is tools used in a subterranean formation that have a movable component that is subjected to shock loading and the use of a field to cushion impact loads and more particularly using a magnetic field to control shock loading on a flapper of a subsurface safety valve.
Magnets have been used to act as dampeners such as in the context of exercise equipment as illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,752,879. Magnets have been used in fluid flow systems to hold a position of a moving component such as for example in an open or a closed position. Illustrative of a gas line and a medical device application are U.S. Pat. No. 5,209,454 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,970,801. In a similar vein is U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,069. The use of magnets to control the fixation of a movable member in a level control application is seen in U.S. Pat. No. 4,436,109. These disparate applications seek to use the force of a magnetic field for fixation to a given position. Some of them release the component when the magnetic field is deactivated.
In downhole applications and most particularly in valves where large pressure differentials can build in an instant as a valve member such as a flapper moves against a seat, there can be serious damage from the impact force that can be severe enough to deform the valve member or the mating seat. In the case of subsurface safety valve flappers, when opened but more so when allowed to close, there is a risk of flapper or seat damage or damage to both from a severe impact loading. Accordingly the present invention seeks to cushion or even eliminate the shock contact while still allowing the movable member to reach its intended ultimate position. In the context of a flapper, the preferred embodiment locates at least one magnet on the flapper and magnets in the housing adjacent the location of the flapper when it reaches its ultimate open or closed position. In this manner the application of a magnetic field to the pivoting flapper damps any impact with the seat in the closed position and any travel stop for the open position. These and other features of the present invention will be more apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated FIGS. while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is given by the appended claims.
A flapper in a subsurface safety valve has at least one magnet that comes in close proximity with another magnet mounted in a fixed position on the valve body. There is a fixed magnet on the body adjacent to the fully open and the fully closed positions of the flapper. In each case like poles on the flapper magnet and the housing magnet come in close proximity as the flapper reaches its fully open and fully closed positions. The orientation of like poles adjacent each other creates a repelling force that damps or eliminates shock loading.
The basic structure of a downhole subsurface safety valve is known to those skilled in the art. Basically, a hydraulic control line runs from the surface to the valve to operate a piston that is biased against the applied pressure in the control line. Pressurizing the control line moves the piston which is linked for tandem movement with a flow tube 10. The flow tube 10 rides inside seat assembly 12 the lower end of which has a seat 14. A flapper 16 is pivoted at 18 and the pivot shaft can have a spring to bias the flapper 16 into the closed position of
Those skilled in the art will see that as the flow tube 10 is retracted and the flapper starts movement from the
The way the dampening is accomplished in the preferred embodiment is to fixedly mount a permanent magnet 22 and 24 in the housing 26 and a magnet 27 to the flapper 16 on an extending tab 28. Tab 28 is preferably diametrically opposed from the location of the pivot connection 18. The opposing surfaces of magnets 24 and 27 are of the same polarity so that they repel each other as they get closer together. The same can be said for magnets 22 and 27 as they approach each other when the flapper 16 goes toward the open position of
It should also be noted that introducing high pressure and high velocity gas in a downhole direction which is the reverse of arrow 20 from above a closed flapper 16 can accelerate the flapper 16 to the open position of
Magnet pair 22 and 27 also prevent another problem. Sometimes when the flow tube 10 is raised by the control system (not shown) high velocity gas gets behind the flapper 16 in the open position and creates a low pressure zone behind the flapper 16 that in extreme cases holds the flapper in the open position where it needs to go to the closed position. The magnet pair 22 and 27 can provide a repelling force to drive the flapper 16 toward the closed position. To do this the preferred orientation of this pair of magnets is alignment. The flow tube 10 will push the flapper out of the way when going to the open position so alignment of this magnet pair is not an issue even if the repelling force does not diminish since the force behind the moving flow tube will overcome the repelling force in any event. The magnet 22 can optionally be eliminated.
While more complicated, one or more of the magnets can be powered electromagnets that can be selectively powered or turned off from a location removed from the valve. Other electrical fields are contemplated that can create a repelling force. It should be noted that the flapper momentum by definition overcomes the repelling force while it is being decelerated with the repelling force diminishing or going to zero when the magnets 24 and 27 get toward a radially aligned position shown in
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3004309 | Korodi | Oct 1961 | A |
4436109 | Taylor | Mar 1984 | A |
4577657 | Alexander | Mar 1986 | A |
5209454 | Engdahl et al. | May 1993 | A |
5752879 | Berdut | May 1998 | A |
5970801 | Ciobanu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6315047 | Deaton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
7021386 | Vick et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7527069 | Denike et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7703532 | O'Malley et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7762521 | Brun et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7814974 | Sponchia | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819190 | Sponchia | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7931081 | Sponchia | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20040211422 | Arcilla et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060157240 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080157014 | Vick et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090032238 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090071654 | O'Malley et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100294502 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |