Sequencing by synthesis (SBS) is a type of nucleic acid sequencing used, for example, for DNA sequencing. SBS involves binding of primer-hybridized template DNA, incorporation of a deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), and detection of incorporated dNTP. Conventional SBS for DNA sequencing relies on the detection of fluorescence. Specifically, fluorescence-based technologies used to differentiate between different bases in a sample (e.g., in fluorescence-based nucleic acid sequencing technologies) rely on, for example, the quality of a signal generated by a detection moiety that is associated with a particular type of nucleotide. For example, conventional fluorescent sequencing technologies utilize identifiably-distinct fluorescent moieties, each attached to one of the four nucleotides A, T, C, and G that are utilized in a sequencing reaction.
One conventional method of DNA sequencing involves adapting single-strand DNA (ssDNA) for attachment to a solid support of a sequencing apparatus and amplifying the quantity of the ssDNA using techniques such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to create many DNA molecules with a short leader. The PCR is a process in which a single DNA molecule can be amplified (replicated) by orders of magnitude into thousands or even millions of copies of the molecule. The process relies on cycling a PCR mixture containing polymerase, dNTPs, sample DNA template, and primers through different temperatures. At a first, high-temperature range, denaturation occurs as the paired strands of the double-stranded sample DNA template separate into two individual strands. At a second, low-temperature range, annealing of primers complementary to the region of the sample DNA template being targeted for amplification takes place. At a third, mid-temperature range, extension of the complementary sequence from the primer occurs, during which the polymerase adheres to the primer and uses nucleotides to replicate each isolated sample DNA template strand. This cycle is typically repeated multiple (typically many) times to increase the amount of replicated DNA on an exponential basis until the desired amount is present for a particular experiment.
Following amplification, an oligo complementary to the short leader may be added so that there is a short section of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) at the leader. The double stranded portion of the bound molecule is a primer for a suitable DNA polymerase, such as, for example, Taq polymerase, which is operable at high temperatures.
The sequencing procedure can then take one of several approaches. For example, the sequencing can use a mixture of four fluorescently-labeled 3′-blocked NTPs (fluorescently labeled dideoxynucleotide terminators), where the fluorescent label is part of the 3′-blocking group. The fluorescent label serves as a “reversible terminator” for polymerization. Each of the NTPs is labeled by a different label (i.e., each of the A, G, C, and T nucleotides has a different label), and the different labels are distinguishable by fluorescent spectroscopy or by other optical means.
In conventional sequencing approaches, four fluorescently-labeled nucleotide precursors are used to sequence millions of clusters of DNA strands in parallel. DNA polymerase catalyzes the incorporation of fluorescently-labeled dNTPs into a DNA template strand during sequential cycles of DNA synthesis. In each sequencing cycle, the bound double strand DNA molecule is exposed to DNA polymerase and a mixture of the four fluorescently-labeled 3′-blocked NTPs. The polymerase adds one of the four dNTPs to the growing oligonucleotide chain (whichever dNTP is complementary to the next unpaired base in the ssDNA). The unincorporated dNTPs and other impurities that are either left unreacted or generated during the reactions are then separated from the vicinity of the support-bound DNA by washing at a temperature that prevents the free dNTPs from binding to the ssDNA but is not so high as to dehybridize the dsDNA.
Because only one of the four types of dNTP will have been added to the oligonucleotide, and the four fluorescent labels are distinguishable, the identity of the incorporated dNTP can be identified through laser excitation and imaging. Specifically, each of four filters is used to determine whether light of a particular wavelength (e.g., color) is emitted. The fluorescent label can then be enzymatically cleaved to allow the next round of incorporation. Because each base type can pair with one and only one other base type, the identity of the just-paired base in the unknown sequence of the ssDNA is known from the identity of the incorporated dNTP (which is known from the wavelength of emitted light). Thus, the base is identified directly from fluorescence measurements during each cycle.
One disadvantage of the above-described approach is that a complicated optics system is needed to filter out different wavelengths of light to detect the fluorescent labels of the incorporated dNTPs and to distinguish between the different emitted colors. Other approaches have been developed to simplify the optics system, but they are slower to sequence and require intermediate chemistry steps within each sequencing cycle. Thus, these approaches have been introduced in smaller, less expensive entry-level sequencing systems but not in higher-level systems requiring fast throughput.
Accordingly, there is a need to improve DNA sequencing and, generally, molecule detection.
This summary represents non-limiting embodiments of the disclosure.
In some embodiments, a detection device comprises one or more pole pieces, one or more sensors, each of the one or more sensors coupled to at least one of the one or more pole pieces, and detection circuitry coupled to the one or more sensors. In some embodiments, the detection circuitry is configured to detect a characteristic of each of the one or more sensors, where the characteristic indicates presence or absence of one or more magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) coupled to at least one of a plurality of molecules to be detected. The characteristic detected by the detection circuitry may comprise a voltage, current, resistance, frequency, phase, noise, or temperature; a change in voltage, current, resistance, frequency, phase, noise, or temperature; or a change in a statistical property (e.g., mean, variance, standard deviation, etc.) of voltage, current, resistance, frequency, phase, noise, or temperature. In some embodiments, at least one of the one or more pole pieces is operable to draw the one or more MNPs toward at least one of the one or more sensors. The one or more sensors may comprise one or more of a temperature sensor, a magnetoresistive (MR) sensor, a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ), a spin-torque oscillator (STO), or a spin valve.
In some embodiments, the detection device also has at least one reagent area configured to hold fluid containing the plurality of molecules to be detected. The at least one reagent area may comprise a fluidic channel. In some embodiments having at least one reagent area, one or more surfaces within the reagent area provide one or more sites for binding the plurality of molecules to be detected, the one or more sites being located among the one or more sensors. At least one magnetic shield may be disposed between at least two of the one or more sites.
In some embodiments, the detection device also includes a barrier material (e.g., an insulator or a metal) encapsulating the one or more sensors and for providing a barrier between the one or more sensors and the at least one of the plurality of molecules to be detected.
In some embodiments, the one or more pole pieces comprises at least one line coupling at least one of the one or more sensors to the detection circuitry. In some embodiments, at least one of the one or more pole pieces has a conical, triangular, or pyramidal shape. In some embodiments, at least one of the one or more pole pieces is configured to assist in creating a magnetic field gradient for drawing at least a portion of the one or more MNPs toward one or more of the one or more sensors.
The detection device may further comprise one or more solenoids or ferromagnetic components. In some such embodiments, at least one of the one or more sensors is disposed between its respective one of the one or more pole pieces and a respective one of the one or more solenoids or ferromagnetic components.
In some embodiments comprising a one or more solenoids or ferromagnetic components, the detection device further comprises one or more yokes, wherein at least one of the one or more solenoids or ferromagnetic components is disposed between its respective sensor and a respective one of the one or more yokes, thereby forming one or more magnetic circuits. In some such embodiments, at least one ferromagnetic component has a coercivity enabling the ferromagnetic component to be selectively magnetized or selectively demagnetized by an external magnetic field. A remanence of each ferromagnetic component may be selected to enable the ferromagnetic component to detect the one or more MNPs.
In some embodiments, the detection device further comprises at least one magnetic component configured to generate a magnetic field through the one or more pole pieces.
In some embodiments, the one or more sensors comprise a plurality of sensors disposed in a cross-point array comprising a first top line, a second top line, a first bottom line, and a second bottom line, and the first top line is coupled to the first bottom line at a first location, the first top line is coupled to the second bottom line at a second location, the second top line is coupled to the first bottom line at a third location, and the second top line is coupled to the second bottom line at a fourth location. In some such embodiments, the first and second top lines are substantially parallel to each other, the first and second bottom lines are substantially parallel to each other, and the first and second top lines are substantially perpendicular to the first and second bottom lines.
In some embodiments, the detection device is a sequencing device, and the plurality of molecules to be detected comprises biologic molecules (e.g., nucleic acids).
In some embodiments, the detection circuitry comprises one or more selector devices, and at least one of the one or more selector devices is coupled to a respective one of the one or more sensors. In some embodiments in which the detection circuitry comprises one or more selector devices, at least one of the one or more selector devices comprises a transistor. In some embodiments in which the detection circuitry comprises one or more selector devices, at least one of the one or more selector devices comprises an in-stack selector.
In some embodiments, the one or more sensors comprise a plurality of sensors, wherein a first subset of the plurality of sensors is arranged in a first row, a second subset of the plurality of sensors is arranged in a second row that is substantially parallel to the first row, and at least one reagent area is disposed between the first and second rows.
In some embodiments, a method of using a detection device that comprises one or more pole pieces, one or more sensors, a reagent area, and detection circuitry comprises labeling a nucleotide precursor with one or more MNPs, adding the labeled nucleotide precursor to the reagent area, detecting a characteristic of at least one of the one or more sensors, and, for that sensor, based at least in part on the detected characteristic, determining whether the labeled nucleotide precursor has been detected. In some embodiments, the method further comprises binding a nucleic acid strand to be sequenced to the detection device in the reagent area before adding the labeled nucleotide precursor to the reagent area. In some embodiments, the method further comprises applying a magnetic field to the detection device and, using the detection circuitry, detecting the characteristic of at least one of the one or more sensors while the magnetic field is being applied. In some embodiments, after detecting the characteristic of the at least one of the one or more sensors, the magnetic field is turned off and, while the magnetic field is off, the MNPs are removed (e.g., cleaved) and the reagent area is washed.
Objects, features, and advantages of the disclosure will be readily apparent from the following description of certain embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
For simplicity of description, the disclosure below will use DNA for illustration and discussion, though various embodiments can be generally applied to molecule detection.
The use of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) for molecule detection, such as for nucleic acid sequencing (e.g., DNA sequencing) has been proposed as an alternative to the use of fluorescent labels. See, for example, U.S. application Ser. No. 16/791,759, filed Feb. 14, 2020 and entitled “SPIN TORQUE OSCILLATOR (STO) SENSORS USED IN NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCING ARRAYS AND DETECTION SCHEMES FOR NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCING”, which published as U.S. 2020/0324283 on Oct. 15, 2020; U.S. application Ser. No. 16/819,636 filed Mar. 16, 2020 and entitled “DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FREQUENCY- AND PHASE-BASED DETECTION OF MAGNETICALLY-LABELED MOLECULES USING SPIN TORQUE OSCILLATOR (STO) SENSORS”, which published as U.S. 2020/0326392 on Oct. 15, 2020; U.S. application Ser. No. 16/727,064, filed Dec. 26, 2019 and entitled “DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MOLECULE DETECTION BASED ON THERMAL STABILITIES OF MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLES”, which published as U.S. 2020/0326309 on Oct. 15, 2020; U.S. application Ser. No. 16/697,013, filed Nov. 26, 2019 and entitled “THERMAL SENSOR ARRAY FOR MOLECULE DETECTION AND RELATED DETECTION SCHEMES”, which published as U.S. 2020/0326335 on Oct. 15, 2020 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,327,073 on May 10, 2022; and U.S. application Ser. No. 16/659,383, filed Oct. 21, 2019 and entitled “MAGNETORESISTIVE SENSOR ARRAY FOR MOLECULE DETECTION AND RELATED DETECTION SCHEMES”, which published as U.S. 2020/0326391 on Oct. 15, 2020 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,112,468 on Sep. 7, 2021. All of the above-referenced applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
In one approach for DNA sequencing applications that uses magnetic nanoparticles as labels, four nucleotide precursors, each labeled by a different MNP type, may be used to sequence many (e.g., millions of) clusters of DNA strands in parallel. As in conventional approaches, DNA polymerase catalyzes the incorporation of dNTPs into a DNA template strand during sequential cycles of DNA synthesis. In contrast to conventional approaches, however, the dNTPs are magnetically-labeled. In each sequencing cycle, the bound double strand DNA molecule is exposed to DNA polymerase and a mixture of the four magnetically-labeled 3′-blocked NTPs. The polymerase adds one of the four dNTPs to the growing oligonucleotide chain (whichever dNTP is complementary to the next unpaired base in the ssDNA). The unincorporated dNTPs and other impurities that are either left unreacted or generated during the reactions are then separated from the vicinity of the support-bound DNA by washing at a temperature that prevents the free dNTPs from binding to the ssDNA but is not so high as to dehybridize the dsDNA. Because only one of the four types of dNTP will have been added to each oligonucleotide, and the four magnetic labels are distinguishable, the identity of the incorporated dNTP can be identified using various types of sensors and detection circuitry disclosed, for example, in U.S. application Ser. Nos. 16/791,759, 16/819,636, 16/727,064, 16/697,013, and 16/659,383.
In another approach, all of the nucleotide precursors are labeled by the same type of MNP, and only one of the four magnetically-labeled nucleotide precursors is tested at a time. After each nucleotide precursor is added, the polymerase adds a dNTP to oligonucleotide chains in which the next unpaired base is the one that is complementary to the magnetically-labeled dNTP that was added. Because the identity of the added nucleotide precursor is known, it is possible to determine, based on signals sensed by the sensors, the last-completed base of each of the ssDNA strands that has incorporated the magnetically-labeled dNTP.
A number of sensor embodiments have been disclosed (see, e.g., U.S. application Ser. Nos. 16/791,759, 16/819,636, 16/727,064, 16/697,013, and 16/659,383). These sensors may be, for example, sensors that sense heat generated by the MNPs when they are exposed to an alternating magnetic field (disclosed, e.g., in U.S. application Ser. No. 16/697,013 and Ser. No. 16/727,064). As another example, each of sensors may be a magnetoresistive (MR) sensor (e.g., a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ)), the resistance of which changes depending on whether a MNP is in its vicinity (disclosed, e.g., in U.S. application Ser. No. 16/659,383). As yet another example, the sensors may use spin-torque oscillators (STDs), spin valves, or similar structures that generate a radio-frequency (RF) signal in response to a MNP being is in the vicinity (disclosed, e.g., in U.S. application Ser. No. 16/791,759 and Ser. No. 16/819,636). In such embodiments, the presence or absence of a MNP in the vicinity of a sensor may be determined by sensing, for example, the presence or absence of a RF signal generated by the STO, or the frequency (or variation in frequency), phase (or variation in phase), or noise of a RF signal generated by the STO. Other types of sensors (e.g., optical sensors) are possible and are contemplated. The examples provided herein are not intended to be limiting.
Devices for use in molecule detection based on MNPs have been disclosed in the above-referenced patent applications.
As shown in
In some embodiments, each of the plurality of sensors 105 is coupled to at least one line 120 for reading a characteristic of one or more of the sensors 105. (For simplicity, this document refers to lines by the reference number 120. Individual lines are designated by the reference number 120 followed by a letter.) The characteristic provides an indication of whether one or more MNPs are in the vicinity of a sensor 105. For example, as stated above and in the applications incorporated by reference, the characteristic may be a temperature or a change in temperature, a resistance or change in resistance, a voltage or change in voltage, a current or change in current, a presence or absence of a RF signal, a feature of a RF signal (e.g., phase, noise, frequency), a change in an aspect of an RF signal (e.g., its phase, noise, frequency), or any other characteristic that indicates whether one or more MNPs are in the vicinity of the sensor 105.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The detection device 100 also includes a reagent area 115 that is adjacent to the sensor array 110. As its name suggests, the reagent area 115 is configured to hold reagents (e.g., fluids such as liquids, gases, plasmas) when the detection device 100 is in use. The reagent area 115 may have any suitable shape (regular or irregular) to hold fluids, and it may include at least one movable piece (e.g., a stopper, a flap, etc.) to allow reagents to enter into and/or exit the reagent area 115. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, it may be advantageous for each sensor 105 to detect MNPs coupled to a single respective support structure 114. For example, in some types of SBS, a long strand of DNA is (or a plurality of long strands of DNA from a single donor organism are) cut into smaller, random-length segments prior to sequencing. All of these smaller strands, which are from the same donor, are randomized sub-strands of the complete strand to be sequenced. For example, if the complete strand includes the sequence ATGGCTTAG, the smaller strands could include, for example, distinct sub-strands (e.g., ATGG and CTTAG) as well as, if a plurality of the longer strands are cut into sub-strands, sub-strands that partially or completely overlap other sub-strands (e.g., TGGC and GCTTA). All of the smaller, randomized sub-strands may be sequenced at the same time, potentially after being amplified. In such applications, it will be appreciated that because the sub-strands do not represent the same sub-sequences, it may be desirable to detect, independently and for each sensor 105, a characteristic (or change in a characteristic) caused by MNPs being in the vicinity of that sensor 105 because the sequencing of the sub-strands will not be coordinated (or synchronized) amongst sub-strands. For example, during a single sequencing cycle, a first sub-strand may incorporate cytosine, a second sub-strand might incorporate thymine, and a third sub-strand might incorporate adenine. In order to sequence multiple random segments of a larger nucleic acid strand, it is desirable, in each sequencing cycle, to determine whether and at which physical location(s) each dNTP type has been incorporated.
To simplify the explanation,
Furthermore, it is to be understood that although
As an example of a detection device 100 with a larger number of sensors 105 in the sensor array 110,
As illustrated in
Referring to
In some embodiments, each sensor 105 is assigned to a single reagent area 115. For example, in the exemplary device illustrated in
In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
In some embodiments (see, e.g.,
One consequence of PCR amplification for approaches using MNPs and detection devices 100 such as the exemplary detection devices 100 illustrated in
Depending on the distances between the MNPs and the sensors 105, MNPs labeling dNTPs incorporated into a DNA template strand attached to the support structure 114 near a particular sensor 105 may be too far away for the sensor 105 to detect them reliably. It would be desirable for the MNPs to be closer to the sensors 105 to improve the detection probability and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the detection procedure.
Disclosed herein are devices and methods for reducing the distances between MNPs labeling the molecules being detected and the sensors 105 that detect those MNPs. Generally, the MNPs are moved closer to the sensors 105 by an applied magnetic field, which causes a gradient that draws the MNPs toward the area with the largest gradient, near the sensor 105.
The magnetic field can be generated in a number of ways beyond the example pole piece shown in
In some embodiments, the magnetic field is selectively switched on and off depending on whether it is desirable to draw MNPs into the gap between the pole piece 210 and the yoke 220. For example, when the magnetic field is on, MNPs are drawn into the gap between the pole piece 210 and the yoke 220, thereby drawing them closer to the sensor 105. When the magnetic field is off, the MNPs are not drawn into the gap, and they may be washed away (e.g., between sequencing cycles).
As described above,
In some embodiments, multiple sensors 105 may share a particular pole piece 210. Stated another way, a single pole piece 210 may assist multiple sensors 105. In addition or alternatively, a particular sensor 105 may be assisted by (e.g., it may sense MNPs directed toward it by) multiple pole pieces 210. Generally, a sensor 105 may be assisted by one or more pole pieces 210, and a pole piece 210 may assist one or more sensors 105.
It is to be understood that the example embodiments shown in
In some embodiments, instead of each sensor 105 being coupled to a solenoid 215, yoke 220, or similar structure, an external magnetic component (e.g., the magnetic component(s) 150 shown in
The magnetic field may be adjusted to adapt to increasing distance between the sensor 105 and the MNPs coupled or attached to the support structure 114 assigned to that sensor 105. For example, in DNA sequencing applications, the distance between the MNPs and the sensor 105 will increase as the sequencing procedure proceeds and the DNA strands grow longer. To compensate, the magnetic field may be adjusted (increased) in later sequencing cycles relative to earlier sequencing cycles to move the MNPs over larger distances, closer to the sensors 105, to mitigate SNR degradation as the strands being sequenced grow longer.
In some embodiments, magnetic shields are disposed between adjacent support structures 114 and/or sensors 105.
It is to be understood that
It is also to be appreciated that although the explanation of
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology has been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed embodiments. In some instances, the terminology or drawings may imply specific details that are not required to practice the invention.
To avoid obscuring the present disclosure unnecessarily, well-known components are shown in block diagram form and/or are not discussed in detail or, in some cases, at all.
Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, all terms are to be given their broadest possible interpretation, including meanings implied from the specification and drawings and meanings understood by those skilled in the art and/or as defined in dictionaries, treatises, etc. As set forth explicitly herein, some terms may not comport with their ordinary or customary meanings.
As used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” do not exclude plural referents unless otherwise specified. The word “or” is to be interpreted as inclusive unless otherwise specified. Thus, the phrase “A or B” is to be interpreted as meaning all of the following: “both A and B,” “A but not B,” and “B but not A.” Any use of “and/or” herein does not mean that the word “or” alone connotes exclusivity.
As used in the specification and the appended claims, phrases of the form “at least one of A, B, and C,” “at least one of A, B, or C,” “one or more of A, B, or C,” and “one or more of A, B, and C” are interchangeable, and each encompasses all of the following meanings: “A only,” “B only,” “C only,” “A and B but not C,” “A and C but not B,” “B and C but not A,” and “all of A, B, and C.”
The term “coupled” is used herein to express a direct connection/attachment as well as a connection/attachment through one or more intervening elements or structures. Accordingly, for example, with reference to
To the extent that the terms “include(s),” “having,” “has,” “with,” and variants thereof are used in the detailed description or the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising,” i.e., meaning “including but not limited to.”
The terms “exemplary” and “embodiment” are used to express examples, not preferences or requirements.
The terms “over,” “under,” “between,” and “on” are used herein refer to a relative position of one feature with respect to other features. For example, one feature disposed “over” or “under” another feature may be directly in contact with the other feature or may have intervening material. Moreover, one feature disposed “between” two features may be directly in contact with the two features or may have one or more intervening features or materials. In contrast, a first feature “on” a second feature is in contact with that second feature. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, and the dimensions, shapes, and sizes of the features may differ substantially from how they are depicted in the drawings.
It is to be understood that although parts of the disclosure are in the context of nucleic acid sequencing, and DNA sequencing in particular, the disclosures herein are applicable generally to the detection of molecules by using MNPs as tags or labels. It will be appreciated by those having skill in the art that the concepts discussed and many of the disclosed embodiments are applicable to other types of molecule detection (e.g., inorganic molecules).
Although specific embodiments have been disclosed, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments may be applied, at least where practicable, in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application claims the benefit of, and hereby incorporates by reference the entirety of the contents of, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/938,984, filed Nov. 22, 2019 and entitled “Magnetic Gradient Concentrator/Reluctance Detector for Molecule Detection.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5200084 | Liberti | Apr 1993 | A |
5302509 | Cheeseman | Apr 1994 | A |
6037167 | Adelman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046585 | Simmonds | Apr 2000 | A |
6197520 | Wittwer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6406848 | Bridgham et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6654505 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6806052 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6831994 | Bridgham et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833246 | Balasubramanian | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6905736 | Chow et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6969488 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969679 | Okamura et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7057026 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7115400 | Adessi et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7282370 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7382586 | Carey et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7405281 | Xu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7414116 | Milton et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427673 | Balasubramanian et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7473031 | Wolkin et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7541444 | Milton et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7566537 | Balasubramanian et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7771973 | Milton et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772384 | Balasubramanian et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7920032 | Makinwa et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8053244 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8058031 | Xu et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8071739 | Milton et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8130072 | De Bruyker et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8158346 | Balasubramanian et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8252910 | Korlach et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8259409 | Braganca et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8361713 | Bridgham et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8367813 | Korlach | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8432644 | Braganca et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8462461 | Braganca et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8513029 | Zhou | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8553346 | Braganca et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570677 | Braganca et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8597881 | Milton et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8652810 | Adessi et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8654465 | Braganca et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8675309 | Braganca et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8728729 | Bridgham et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8728825 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9121062 | Balasubramanian et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9273354 | Bridgham et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9297006 | Adessi et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9435791 | Acosta et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9453258 | Kain et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9464107 | Wegener et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9587275 | Emig et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9605310 | Balasubramanian et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9640748 | Gotsmann et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
10203379 | Wang et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10260095 | Esfandyarpour et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10591440 | Astier et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
11112468 | Braganca | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20040043479 | Briscoe et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040219695 | Fox | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050054081 | Hassard et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050118102 | Xiang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070224700 | Masters | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070264159 | Graham et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080218165 | Kahlman et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241569 | Qin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090148857 | Srivastava et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090206832 | Kahlman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090208957 | Korlach et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100039105 | Ryan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100111768 | Banerjee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100194386 | Prins et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100207631 | McDowell | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231214 | Zhou | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110223612 | Wang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120295262 | Ronaghi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20140008281 | Ramanathan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140139214 | Park et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140292318 | Wang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160131613 | Jayant | May 2016 | A1 |
20170304825 | Issadore et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180074016 | Chen et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180100190 | Esfandyarpour et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180128822 | Wang et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180237850 | Mandell | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180284200 | Chen et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190032114 | Trivedi | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190170680 | Sikora et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190390267 | Astier et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200324283 | Braganca et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200326309 | Braganca et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200326335 | Braganca et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200326392 | Braganca et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210047681 | Mendonsa et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210047682 | Mendonsa et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210079455 | Braganca et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102928596 | Feb 2013 | CN |
103885000 | Jun 2014 | CN |
107873060 | Apr 2018 | CN |
108138229 | Jun 2018 | CN |
107051597 | Aug 2019 | CN |
1544310 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2674264 | Dec 2013 | EP |
3208627 | Aug 2017 | EP |
2005047864 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2005124345 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2015031691 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2016183218 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017030999 | Feb 2017 | WO |
2017061129 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2018017884 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2018186539 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2019068204 | Apr 2019 | WO |
2020210370 | Oct 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of EP 2674264. Retrieved Sep. 14, 2022 (Year: 2022). |
Daschiel et al. The holy grail of microfluidics: sub-laminar drag by layout of periodically embedded microgrooves (2013) MicrofluidNanofluid 15, 675-687. |
Mao et al. A Microfluidic Device with a Linear Temperature Gradient for Parallel and Combinatorial Measurements (2002) J AmChem Soc 124, 4432-4435. |
Qiu et al. Instrument-free point-of-care molecular diagnosis of H 1 N 1 based on microfluidic convective PCR (2017) Sensors andActuators B: Chemical 243, 738-744. |
E. du Trémolet de Lacheisserie, D. Gignoux, and M. Schlenker (editors), Magnetism: Materials and Applications, vol. 2. Springer, 2005. |
E. Hall, “On a New Action of the Magnet on Electric Currents,” American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2, 287, 1879. |
G. Li, S. Sun, R. J. Wilson, R. L. White, N. Pourmand, S. X. Wang, “Spin valve sensors for ultrasensitive detection of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biological applications,” Sensors and Actuators, vol. 126, 98, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT /US2020/027290 (filed Apr. 8, 2020), dated Jun. 25, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/068131 (filed Dec. 20, 2019), dated Apr. 1, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/068535 (filed Dec. 26, 2019), dated Apr. 26, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/014707 (filed Jan. 23, 2020), dated May 11, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/021776 (filed Mar. 9, 2020), dated Sep. 1, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/023069 (filed Mar. 17, 2020), dated Jul. 20, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/023078 (filed Mar. 17, 2020), dated Jul. 19, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/035915 (filed Jun. 3, 2020), dated Aug. 26, 2020. |
J. C. Slonczewski, “Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 159, L1, 1996. |
L. Berger, “Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current,” Physical Review B, vol. 54, 9353, 1996. |
Lany, M., G. Boero, and R. S. Popovic. “Superparamagnetic microbead inductive detector”. Review of scientific instruments 76.8 (2005): 084301. |
Latha, G., Kumar, P. D., Gopi, K., Srikanth, P., Kusumalatha, Y., & Babu, G. V. (2017). A review on magnetic micro/nanoparticles. World J. Pharm. Res, 6, 341-366. |
M. Díaz-Michelena, “Small Magnetic Sensors for Space Applications,” Sensors, vol. 9, 2271, 2009. |
Michael L. Metzker, “Sequencing Technologies—the Next Generation,” Nature Rev. Genet. 11: 31-46 (2009). |
Miller, M. M., et al. “A DNA array sensor utilizing magnetic microbeads and magnetoelectronic detection”. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 225.1-2 (2001): 138-144. |
P. Anderson, J. Rowell, “Probable Observation of the Josephson Superconducting Tunneling Effect,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 10, 230, 1963. |
P. M. Braganca, B. A. Gurney, B. A. Wilson, J. A. Katine, S. Maat and J. R. Childress, “Nanoscale magnetic field detection using a spin torque oscillator,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, 235202, 2010. |
P. Namdari, H. Daraee, and A. Eatemadi, “Recent Advances in Silicon Nanowire Biosensors: Synthesis Methods, Properties and Applications”, Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 11, 406, 2016. |
Quynh, L. K., et al. Detection of magnetic nanoparticles using simple AMR sensors in Wheatstone bridge. Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 2016, 1.1: 98-102. |
R. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, A. H. Silver & J. E. Mercereau, “Quantum Interference Effects in Josephson Tunneling,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 12, 159, 1964. |
R. Sato, K. Kudo, T. Nagasawa, H. Suto, and K. Mizushima, “Simulations and Experiments Toward High-Data-Transfer-Rate Readers Composed of a Spin-Torque Oscillator,” IEEE Transactions On Magnetics, vol. 48, 1758, 2012. |
Rabehi, A., Electromagnetic microsystem for the detection of magnetic nanoparticles in a microfluidic structure for immunoassays (Doctoral dissertation). Jan. 29, 2020. |
Rauwerdink, A. M., Giustini, A. J., & Weaver, J. B. (2010). Simultaneous quantification of multiple magnetic nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, 21(45), 455101. |
Riedinger, A., Guardia, P., Curcio, A., Garcia, M. A., Cingolani, R., Manna, L., & Pellegrino, T. (2013). Subnanometer local temperature probing and remotely controlled drug release based on azo-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles. Nano letters, 13(6), 2399-2406. |
Srimani T. et al., “High Sensitivity Biosensor using Injection Locked Spin Torque Nano-Oscillators,” arXiv: 1511.09072, Nov. 2015. |
Tang, C., He, Z., Liu, H., Xu, Y., Huang, H., Yang, G., . . . & Chen, Z. (2020). Application of magnetic nanoparticles in nucleic acid detection. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 18, 1-19. Apr. 21, 2020. |
Wang, W., & Jiang, Z., “Thermally assisted magnetic tunneling junction for biosensing applications,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 43(6), 2406-2408, Jun. 30, 2007. |
Weijun Zhou, et al., “Novel dual fluorescence temperature-sensitive chameleon DNA-templated nanocluster pair for intracellular thermometry” Nano Research (2018), vol. 11, pp. 2012-2023, Mar. 19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1817-7 Mar. 19, 2018 (Mar. 19, 2018). |
Xia, Haiyan et al., “Micromagnetic simulation for detection of magnetic nanobeads by spin torque oscillator,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2017, vol. 432, pp. 387-390, Feb. 4, 2017. |
Y.-C. Liang, L. Chang, W. Qiu, A. G. Kolhatkar, B. Vu, K. Kourentzi, T. R. Lee, Y. Zu, R. Willson, and D. Litvinov, “Ultrasensitive Magnetic Nanoparticle Detector for Biosensor Applications,” Sensors, vol. 17, 1296, 2017. |
Ye, F., Zhao, Y., El-Sayed, R., Muhammed, M., & Hassan, M. (2018). Advances in nanotechnology for cancer biomarkers. Nano Today, 18, 103-123. |
Yu, L., Liu, J., Wu, K., Klein, T., Jiang, Y., & Wang, J. P. (2014). Evaluation of hyperthermia of magnetic nanoparticles by dehydrating DNA. Scientific reports, 4, 7216. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/021274 (filed Mar. 7, 2021), dated Sep. 28, 2021. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/028263 (filed Apr. 21, 2021), dated Aug. 26, 2021. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/040767 (filed Jul. 8, 2021), dated Oct. 25, 2021. |
A. Seki, et al., “Study of the heating characteristics and mechanisms of magnetic nanoparticles over a wide range of frequencies and amplitudes of an alternating magnetic field,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 521 (2014). |
A.M. Sydor et al., “Super-Resolution Microscopy: From Single Molecules to Supramolecular Assemblies,” Trends in Cell Biology, Dec. 2015, vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 730-748. |
B. N. Engel, et al., “A4-Mb Toggle MRAM Based on a Novel Bit and Switching Method,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 41, No. 1, Jan. 2005. |
C. Chappert et al., “The emergence of spin electronics in data storage,” Nature Materials, Dec. 2007. |
C.H. Smith et al., “High-resolution giant magnetoresistance on-chip arrays for magnetic imaging,” Journal of Applied Physics 93, 6864 (2003). |
D. Ross et al., “Temperature Measurement in Microfluidic Systems Using a Temperature-Dependent Fluorescent Dye,” Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 17, 4117-4123, Jul. 24, 2001. |
EPHOTOzine.com, “Complete Guide To Image Sensor Pixel Size,” Aug. 2, 2016, available at https://www.ephotozine.com/article/complete-guide-to-image-sensor-pixel-size-29652. |
F. Grasset et al., “Synthesis, magnetic properties, surface modification and cytotoxicity evaluation of Y3Fe5-xAlxO12 (0?x?2) garnet submicron particles for biomedical applications,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 234, Issue 3, Sep. 2001, pp. 409-418. |
F. Menges et al., “Temperature mapping of operating nanoscale devices by scanning probe thermometry,” Nature Communications, 7:10874, Mar. 3, 2016. |
Illumina, “Illumina CMOS Chip and One-Channel SBS Chemistry,” document No. 770-2013-054-B, 2018 (available at https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/techspotlights/cmos-tech-note-770-2013-054.pdf). |
Illumina, “NovaSeq 6000 Sequencing System,” 2019, available at https://www.illumina.com/systems/sequencing-platforms/novaseq.html. |
International Search Report from PCT App. No. PCT/US2016/046888, dated Oct. 26, 2016. |
J. Sakakibara et al., “Measurements of thermally stratified pipe flow using image-processing techniques,” Experiments in Fluids, Dec. 1993, vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 82-96. |
John Pearce, et al., “Magnetic Heating of Nanoparticles: The Importance of Particle Clustering to Achieve Therapeutic Temperatures,” Journal of Nanotechnology in Engineering and Medicine, Feb. 2014, vol. 4 /011007-1. |
Lin Gui and Carolyn L. Ren, “Temperature measurement in microfluidic chips using photobleaching of a fluorescent thin film,” Applied Physics Letters 92, 024102, 2008. |
M. Aslam et al., “Silica encapsulation and magnetic properties of FePt nanoparticles,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 290 (2005) 444-449. |
M. Hisham Alnasir et al., “Magnetic and magnetothermal studies of pure and doped gadolinium silicide nanoparticles for self-controlled hyperthermia applications,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 449, Mar. 1, 2018, pp. 137-144. |
M.T. Tlili et al., “Magnetic, Electrical Properties and Spin-Glass Effect of Substitution of Ca for Pr in Ca2-xPrxMnO4 Compounds,” The Open Surface Science Journal, 2009, vol. 1, pp. 54-58. |
N. X. Phuc, et al., “Tuning of the Curie Temperature in La1-xSrxMn1-yTiyO3” J. Korean Phy. Soc., vol. 52, No. 5, May 2008, pp. 1492-1495. |
N.R. Patil et al., “Effect of temperature on the fluorescence emission of ENCTTTC in different nonpolar solvents,” Can. J. Phys. 91: 971-975 (2013). |
R. Giri, “Temperature effect study upon the fluorescence emission of substituted coumarins,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy, vol. 48, Issue 6, Jun. 1992, p. 843-848. |
S. Dutz and R. Hergt, “Magnetic nanoparticle heating and heat transfer on a microscale: Basic principles, realities and physical limitations of hyperthermia for tumour therapy,” Int J Hyperthermia, 2013; 29(8): 790-800. |
S.I. Kiselev et al., “Microwave oscillations of a nanomagnet driven by a spin-polarized current,” Nature 425, pp. 380-383, 2003. |
T. Nagasawa et al., “Delay detection of frequency modulation signal from a spin-torque oscillator under a nanosecond-pulsed magnetic field,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 111, 07C908 (2012). |
W. Andrä et al., “Temperature distribution as function of time around a small spherical heat source of local magnetic hyperthermia,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 194, Issues 1-3, Apr. 1999, pp. 197-203. |
Weifeng Shen et al., “Detection of DNA labeled with magnetic nanoparticles using MgO-based magnetic tunnel junction sensors,” Journal of Applied Physics 103, 07A306 (2008). |
Y. Astier, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 62/833,130, “Nucleic Acid Sequencing by Systhesis Using Magnetic Sensor Arrays,” filed Apr. 12, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210156851 A1 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62938984 | Nov 2019 | US |