Claims
- 1. A ceramic magnetic head slider comprising at least one surface comprising an air bearing surface and at least one recess surface disposed adjacent thereto:
- wherein at least said recess surface comprises grains of a plurality of different composition ceramic components, each of which components has a different inherent ion beam millable rate;
- wherein each of said different composition ceramic components have different average grain sizes;
- wherein each different average grain size of each different composition ceramic component has a different ion beam milling rate, and wherein the ion beam milling rates of the grains of each different specific composition ceramic component of the same grain size is different;
- wherein the average grain sizes of each of said different composition ceramic components is selected to be substantially proportional to its inherent ion beam milling rate such that the actual ion beam milling rates of the different average grain sizes of the different composition ceramic components, respectively, are all substantially the same; and
- wherein said recess surface, made by ion beam milling, is substantially smoother than would have been the case if said recess surface was made by ion beam milling of a blank comprising the same different composition ceramic components where each had substantially the same average size grains.
- 2. The slider as claimed in claim 1 wherein said recess surface comprises:
- a larger average grain size of a first composition ceramic component having a higher inherent ion beam milling rate; and
- a smaller average grain size of a second composition ceramic component having a lower inherent ion beam milling rate:
- wherein a specific grain size of said first ceramic component has higher ion beam milling rate than the same grain size of said second ceramic component; and
- wherein the grain size of said second ceramic component is sufficiently smaller than the grain size of said first ceramic component that the actual ion beam milling rate of said grains of said components is substantially the same.
- 3. The slider as claimed in claim 2 wherein said ceramic components comprise, respectively, TiC and Al.sub.2 O.sub.3.
- 4. The slider as claimed in claim 3 wherein the ratio of the grain sizes of said TiC and Al.sub.2 O.sub.3., respectively is 1.0:1.3 to 3.0.
- 5. The slider as claimed in claim 2 wherein said ceramic components comprise TiC, Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and TiO.sub.2.
- 6. The slider as claimed in claim 2 wherein said ceramic components comprise Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and ZrO.sub.2.
- 7. The slider as claimed in claim 2 wherein said ceramic components comprise Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 and SiC.
Priority Claims (2)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
5-117594 |
Apr 1993 |
JPX |
|
6-072889 |
Mar 1994 |
JPX |
|
Parent Case Info
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/228,854 filed Apr. 18, 1994.
US Referenced Citations (6)
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number |
Date |
Country |
62-266726 |
Nov 1987 |
JPX |
4-321556 |
Nov 1992 |
JPX |
4-321557 |
Nov 1992 |
JPX |
4-321555 |
Nov 1992 |
JPX |
Continuations (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
228854 |
Apr 1994 |
|