The present invention relates to magnetic parallel dipole line (PDL) trap systems, and more particularly, to magnetic levitation transport using a PDL track system.
With traditional forms of transportation, wheels are used that contact the ground or other surfaces such as rails. This contact causes friction which constitutes a significant energy loss. Friction also brings about accelerated wear to the various components.
As such, magnetic levitation transport systems are a favorable alternative as they provide transportation without any contact with the ground or other surface. Thus, energy loss due to friction is minimized as is noise and vibration, and overall energy efficiency of the system is improved.
However, existing magnetic levitation systems are complicated and expensive to create and implement. For instance, some approaches involve extensive electromagnetic systems and cryogenics to operate.
Thus, improved magnetic levitation transport systems would be desirable.
The present invention provides magnetic levitation transport using a parallel dipole line (PDL) track system. In one aspect of the invention, a magnetic levitation transport system is provided. The magnetic levitation transport system includes: a dipole line track system having: i) multiple segments joined together, each of the multiple segments having at least two diametric magnets, and ii) at least one diamagnetic object levitating above the at least two diametric magnets.
In another aspect of the invention, a method for operating a magnetic levitation transport system is provided. The method includes: providing a dipole line track system comprising: i) multiple segments joined together, each of the multiple segments having at least two diametric magnets, ii) at least one diamagnetic object levitating above the at least two diametric magnets, and iii) multiple capacitive plates beneath the dipole line track system; sensing the multiple capacitive plates with a capacitance meter to detect a presence of the diamagnetic object; and applying a voltage bias to each of the multiple capacitive plates in sequence to propel the diamagnetic object along the dipole line track system.
A more complete understanding of the present invention, as well as further features and advantages of the present invention, will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description and drawings.
Provided herein are magnetic levitation transport systems that are based on a parallel dipole line track system. A parallel dipole line (PDL) trap system can be used to trap a diamagnetic cylindrical object. See, for example, Gunawan et al. “A parallel dipole line system,” Applied Physics Letters 106, 062407 (February 2015) (5 pages) (hereinafter “Gunawan 2015”), the contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. The trap consists of a magnetic parallel dipole line system made of a pair of transversely magnetized (or diametric) cylindrical dipole line magnets that naturally attract each other to a fixed position where both magnetization is aligned. Diametric magnets are magnets with magnetization perpendicular to their long axis. For example, in cylindrical diametric magnets the magnetization is along the diameter of the magnets. A diamagnetic cylindrical object such as a graphite rod can be trapped at the center. See, for example, Gunawan 2015, and U.S. Pat. No. 8,895,355 issued to Cao et al., entitled “Magnetic Trap for Cylindrical Diamagnetic Materials,” the contents of which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
The key discovery and the central feature of the PDL trap is the existence of a “camelback magnetic potential” along the longitudinal (z-axis) which is derived from magnetic field enhancement near the edge of the dipole line. This occurs when the length of the dipole line or the magnet exceed certain critical length LC, e.g., for a cylindrical diametric magnet this critical length is LC=2.5 R where R is the radius of the magnet. See for example
A variable gap gM can be introduced in between the diametric magnets to tune the magnetic potential of the PDL trap. See, for example, the cross-sectional view of a PDL trap provided in
Further, one or more electrodes located adjacent to the PDL trap can be used to control and sense the position of the trapped object in the trap. For instance, voltage biased (i.e., capacitive plate) electrodes above (or below—see
According to an exemplary embodiment, a dipole line track system is provided that allows levitation and freedom of movement of the trapped diamagnetic rod along the dipole line track system. See, for example,
In the particular example shown in
As shown in
Consider the diamagnetic rod of mass m0 levitated in a PDL trap. Assuming that it carries a load with mass mL (and negligible magnetic susceptibility, i.e., χ˜0), the maximum load mass that it can sustain is given as:
where a is half separation between magnet centers, i.e., a=R+gM/2. For example, for a diametric magnet with M=106 A/m and graphite rod with χ=−2e−4 and ρ=1700 kg/m3 we have mL/m0=5.2, thus a graphite rod can sustain the weight 5× its weight.
In general, the larger the diamagnetic rod used, the larger the load it can sustain. However, the size of the rod depends on the gap gM in between the diametric magnets that in turn depends on the levitation height y0 and half magnet separation a. The maximum load that it can sustain is given as:
The maximum rod radius bmax is given as:
bmax=√{square root over (y02+a2)}−a and y0=f(M,a,χ,ρ) (3)
where y0 is the levitation height which is a function of the magnet's M and R and the rod's χ and ρ (see Gunawan 2015). For example, a plot of the maximum load mass per unit length versus magnet radius is provided in
One important feature of the present parallel dipole line track system is that when the dipole line segments are joined together to form a track, the “camelback” potential humps (see
Advantageously, the present system is simple, scalable, and requires no cryogenics. In fact, the only locomotive power input required to move the trapped object along the track system is to overcome the resistance of air friction. An exemplary system employing electrodes below the track system is described below, which can be used to propel the trapped object along the track.
According to one exemplary embodiment, the dipole line track system includes a pair of, i.e., two diametric magnets which is suited to trap a small-scale diamagnetic object. For example, one can build the system using tracks with cylindrical diametric magnets each having a diameter of from about 1 millimeter (mm) to about 15 mm, and ranges therebetween. As shown in
In order to support larger design diamagnetic objects, the dipole line track system can include more than two diametric magnets. See, for example,
As another point of comparison, the vehicle in
Of course, the illustration of two parallel dipole line magnets (
As shown in
Embodiments are also contemplated herein where multiple series of capacitive plates are used to sense/propel the vehicle along the track. See for example
As highlighted above, the only locomotive power input required to move the trapped object along the present track system is to overcome the resistance of air friction. According to an exemplary embodiment, one locomotion technique anticipated herein for the present system is using a capacitive drive system where segments of capacitive plates are installed below the track. See
As will be described in detail below, the sequence and/or frequency of the voltage bias pulses can control the direction of travel of the vehicle along the track and/or its speed. Thus, the sequence of voltage pulses metered out by the switch unit can be controlled via a microcomputer having processing capabilities for controlling propulsion of the vehicle.
During operation, the capacitance meter C is used to sense the diamagnetic rod. See, for example, exemplary methodology 900 of
Once the vehicle has left capacitive plate A, the cycle repeats in sequence, whereby in step 906 the capacitive plate B is switched to a ‘sensing’ mode with the capacitance meter C and the capacitive plate C will be driven by a voltage bias to pull the vehicle towards it.
As provided above, a microcomputer can be used to coordinate the switch unit and as such can be configured to perform the steps of methodology 900. A block diagram is shown in
Processor device 1020 can be configured to implement the methods, steps, and functions disclosed herein. The memory 1030 could be distributed or local and the processor device 1020 could be distributed or singular. The memory 1030 could be implemented as an electrical, magnetic or optical memory, or any combination of these or other types of storage devices. Moreover, the term “memory” should be construed broadly enough to encompass any information able to be read from, or written to, an address in the addressable space accessed by processor device 1020. With this definition, information on a network, accessible through network interface 1025, is still within memory 1030 because the processor device 1020 can retrieve the information from the network. It should be noted that each distributed processor that makes up processor device 1020 generally contains its own addressable memory space. It should also be noted that some or all of computer system 1010 can be incorporated into an application-specific or general-use integrated circuit.
Optional display 1040 is any type of display suitable for interacting with a human user of apparatus 1000. Generally, display 1040 is a computer monitor or other similar display.
Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/873,716 filed on Jan. 17, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,800,268, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3664268 | Lucas et al. | May 1972 | A |
5213046 | Proise | May 1993 | A |
5270593 | Levi et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5375531 | Ogihara et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5671058 | Kawaguchi | Sep 1997 | A |
6361268 | Pelrine | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369476 | Sung | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6483222 | Pelrine et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6510799 | Lamb et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6608540 | Hones et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7795770 | Romero et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7859157 | Baur | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8169114 | Simon | May 2012 | B2 |
8895355 | Cao et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9228298 | Oster | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9325220 | Henderson et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9352665 | Melvin et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9978493 | Gunawan | May 2018 | B2 |
10031058 | Gunawan et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10082408 | Gunawan | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10128013 | Gunawan | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10128152 | Cao et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10199247 | Tkachenko et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10308135 | Henderson | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10593456 | Gunawan | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10800268 | Gunawan | Oct 2020 | B2 |
20090160279 | Baur | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20110266109 | Meins et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20140273450 | Cao | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20170045433 | Gunawan et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170229330 | Tkachenko | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170299410 | Gunawan | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180141459 | Henderson | May 2018 | A1 |
20190217722 | Gunawan | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200398678 | Gunawan | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103457439 | Dec 2013 | CN |
S6464551 | Mar 1989 | JP |
2010068603 | Mar 2010 | JP |
20160102761 | Aug 2016 | KR |
WO2016128130 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gunawan et al. “A parallel dipole line system,” Applied Physics Letters 106, 062407 (Feb. 2015) (5 pages). |
English Translation of CN103457439A by Xu Jianning Dec. 18, 2013 (5 pages). |
English Translation of JP2010068603A by Mizutani Yasuhiro Mar. 25, 2010 (10 pages). |
English Translation of KR20160102761A by Kang Ye Gu et al. Aug. 31, 2016 (35 pages). |
English Translation of WO2016128130A1 by Noe Mathias et al. Aug. 18, 2016 (9 pages). |
List of IBM Patents or Applications Treated as Related (2 pages). |
Simon et al., “Diamagnetically stabilized magnet levitation,” UCLA, Mar. 2001 (Year: 2001) (37 pages). |
“Levitation Demo,” Float Like a Butterfly (Year: 2016) (3 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200398678 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15873716 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 17014777 | US |