The disclosed technology regards a magnetic liner having a liner material, a plurality of magnet bases independently secured within the material, and a plurality of magnets, each magnet secured within a recess formed on the top surface of each magnet base. The disclosed technology further regards a method of manufacturing a magnetic liner, using a press mold, by positioning a plurality of magnet bases within the mold, positioning a liner material above the magnet bases, applying heat and pressure to the magnet bases and liner material, and after cooling securing a magnet within a recess formed within each magnet base.
Liners are used in a variety of industrial applications to protect machinery surfaces from material impact and abrasion, such as but not limited to conveyor and material handling components including material chutes and hoppers, skirtboards, lifter bars, mills and scrubbers. In many applications, liners are affixed to the machinery by bolts or similar means of secured affixation; magnetic liners are also provided in these applications.
Magnetic liners are described and disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,287,791 and 9,283,700. The liners disclosed in these patents include elongated bar magnets inserted into grooves formed in ultra-high molecular polyethylene or polyurethane materials and extending the length of the liner, as well as polyurethane liners with elongated ferrous bars positioned within a polyurethane material, each ferrous bar bridging a plurality of magnets for the stated purpose of interlinking magnetic elements and spreading the magnetic flux.
Other magnetic liners suitable for use include rubber liners having a plurality of elongated ferrous bars positioned within the liner material, with a plurality of magnets positioned in recesses on the exposed surface of each ferrous bar, as depicted in
These magnetic liners of the prior art are susceptible to warping during and after the molding process. Warping results from the significantly higher coefficient of thermal expansion of some liner materials (e.g., rubber), than the coefficient of thermal expansion of the ferrous material of the elongated bar. Therefore, when the liner cools it has a tendency to shrink more in the rubber areas and less in the steel areas.
Furthermore, the use of elongated ferrous bars in the prior art limit the flexibility of design of individual liners, and require a significant inventory of differently sized elongated ferrous bars to provide varying sizes of liners for particular applications. Likewise, the elongated ferrous bars provide undesired rigidity to the liner, which may cause the liner to be dislodged when impacted by materials transported through the lined structure.
The magnetic liners of the disclosed technology overcome these drawbacks. Specifically, as the rubber is physically bonded to the steel by heat activated adhesive in the molding process of the disclosed technology, the liner does not shrink in the areas wherein the magnet bases are positioned. Additionally, because the magnet bases are compact and each secure a single magnet, magnet bases may be positioned within a liner to optimize the configuration of each liner based upon intended use, and inventory of magnet bases may be significantly reduced because of their universal application to varying sizes and designs of liners. Surprisingly, the use of a single magnet base for supporting a single magnet (and not a plurality of magnets) does not reduce the magnetic strength of the magnet/ferrous material combination, as suggested by the prior art wherein multiple magnets were affixed to a ferrous material. Further, the smaller magnet bases increase flexibility of the liner to better maintain contact with a metal chute or other structure to which the magnetic liner is magnetically secured, while being subjected to impact from materials. Finally, the disclosed technology results in a significant reduction in weight for the magnetic liner, as compared to the weight of the prior art magnetic liners of
The disclosed technology regards a magnetic liner including a liner, a plurality of magnet bases each having a recess formed on the top surface thereof, and a plurality of magnets, each magnet received and secured within the recess of a magnet base so that the exposed face of the magnet is flush with the top surface of the magnet base when the magnet is seated within the magnet base. The magnet bases are inlaid within the liner so that the body of each magnet base is supported and affixed within the liner, with its top surface substantially or completely exposed and flush with the bottom surface of the liner. Furthermore, the magnet bases are spaced apart within the liner so that no surface of any of the magnet bases is in contact with any surface of any other magnet base.
The disclosed technology further regards a method of manufacturing a magnetic liner, including applying an adhesive about each of a plurality of magnet bases, and positioning the magnet bases in a press mold so that no magnet base touches another magnet base. Each magnet base includes a recess on the surface thereof, and the recesses are positioned at the base of the mold. A liner material is then placed above the plurality of magnet bases; in some embodiments a plurality of ceramic dowels are also placed in the mold, above the liner material. Heat and pressure are then applied by the press mold to secure the magnet bases (and the dowels, if any) within the liner material. Finally, after the liner material and magnet bases are cooled, a magnet is secured within each magnet base.
As shown in
The disclosed technology further includes a plurality of magnets 2, each magnet received and secured within a recess 33 on the top surface of each magnet base (as shown in
As shown in
The pull force of the magnets required or desired for use of the disclosed technology varies depending on, for example, the thickness and material of the liner and the intended use of the system. In some embodiments, the pull force of the magnets within the liner may be between about 500-700 lbs./ft2 of liner, or about 600 lbs/ft2. Magnets suitable for use in the disclosed technology include but may not be limited to permanent magnets, including neodymium and other rare earth magnets.
As shown in the embodiment of
In testing, a 1″ diameter by ⅛″ thick N52 neodymium magnet having a pull strength of about 15.6 lbs., secured within a recess of the magnet base as hereinabove described, the magnet base having a height of ¼″ and a diameter of 1⅞″ (disregarding the depth of the recess), produced about 70.5 lbs. of pull strength, or about 4½ times the pull strength of the magnet alone.
The liner may be made from rubber; urethane may be another suitable liner material. In the embodiment shown in
A wear surface 13 may be integrated with or affixed to the top surface 11 of the liner. The wear surface may have a thickness of between about ¼″ and ¾″, or about ½ of the thickness of the overall liner. In embodiments of the disclosed technology, the wear surface may be a layer of ultra-high-molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW) or similar plastics, impregnated rubber (including, for example, Kevlar), or ceramic tiles. The wear surface would typically (but not necessarily) be molded to the base rubber layer; for wear surfaces including UHMW, for example, a thin layer of finely ground polyethylene powder is placed between a top UHMW layer and a base rubber layer, before molding the layers together. For impregnated rubber wear surfaces, the layers may be placed in the mold, with the impregnated layer on top, and upon application of heat and pressure in the molding process the impregnated rubber top layer may crosslink with the rubber base layer. Ceramic tiles may form the wear surface by applying a cement to the tiles suitable to hot bond the tiles to the rubber in the molding process.
When inlaid within the liner, the magnet bases are separated one-from-another by at least ½″, or by 1″-6″. In the embodiment shown in
In some embodiments, as shown in
The equivalent impact force (F) of an object on a liner (such as debris, coal or other objects which the liner will be subjected to) can be determined from the equation:
F=W+√{square root over (2 kWh/12)}
wherein k is the spring constant of the rubber, W is the weight of object, and h is the height of the object drop. Therefore, using a spring constant of 450 for steel backed rubber, estimating the maximum object weight at 50 lbs., and the maximum height of the object drop at 84″, the equivalent impact force is 611 lbs/ft2. The number of magnet bases (with magnets) n having a magnetic pull force of Fp required to withstand a particular impact force F, can be determined by the following equation:
n=F/F
p
Therefore, if each magnet/magnet base has a pull force of 70.5 lbs/ft2, then to withstand 611 lbs/ft2 impact force would require about 9 magnets per square foot (611/70.5=8.7).
In manufacturing the magnetic liner of the disclosed technology, the magnet bases are positioned in a press mold (with the recesses positioned at the base of the mold), and the liner material is placed thereabove. Ceramic dowels, if any, are positioned above the liner material. Likewise, any wear surface may be positioned above the liner material (with adhesive, if necessary). Heat (about 300° F.) and pressure (about 350 psi) are applied by the press mold to secure the magnet bases within the liner material. To further secure the magnet bases within the liner material, heat activated adhesives used to bond rubber compounds to metal may surround each magnet base when positioned in the press mold. Suitable heat activated adhesives useful for this purpose include those manufactured by Lord Corporation under the trademark Chemlok®. In this embodiment, when the press mold applies heat and pressure to the magnet bases and liner material, the magnet bases are bonded into the liner material.
After the magnet bases are molded within the liner, and the same have cooled sufficiently, one magnet is secured within each magnet base, using for example a urethane or polyurethane adhesive within the recess of the magnet base. The magnets should not be inserted into the recesses during the press mold process, as the heat from the process would degrade the strength of the magnet. By its magnetic field strength and the adhesive, the magnets are secured within the magnet bases and the magnetic liner is available for use.
In manufacture, a 15% reduction in weight was realized by use of the disclosed technology for a rubber liner over the prior art liner depicted in
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62529538 | Jul 2017 | US |