Claims
- 1. In a media mill of the type comprising a magnetizable container, a rotatable multi-polar magnetic agitator within the magnetizable container, the multi-polar magnetic agitator having a central shaft and a plurality of impellers on the shaft at least some of the impellers being magnetic, and magnetizable media within the container, wherein the media particles are sufficiently magnetized by the magnetic agitator so that grinding efficiency is improved and the media particles are present in such quantity as to provide a media volume of at least about 25%.
- 2. A media mill of claim 1 wherein the media are magnetized by a substantially spatially uniform, time invariant magnetic source.
- 3. A media mill of claim 2 wherein the magnetic source is at least one permanent magnet.
- 4. A media mill of claim 3 where some of the permanent magnets on the impeller are enclosed within magnetizable cups.
- 5. A media mill of claim 4 where the permanent magnets within the magnetizable cups are magnetized in the same direction.
- 6. A media mill of claim 4 where the permanent magnets within the magnetizable cups are magnetized in opposite directions.
- 7. A media mill of claim 3 where at least some of the permanent magnets on the agitator are axially magnetized.
- 8. A media mill of claim 7 where at least some the axially magnetized magnets on the agitator are broken into sections with alternating directions of axial magnetization.
- 9. A media mill of claim 3 where at least some the permanent magnets on the agitator are radially magnetized.
- 10. A media mill of claim 9 where at least some the radially magnetized magnets on the agitator are broken into sections with alternating directions of radial magnetization.
- 11. A media mill of claim 3 where some of the permanent magnets are radially magnetized and some of the permanent magnets are axially magnetized.
- 12. A media mill of claim 3 wherein the permanent magnet is at least one impeller of the mill.
- 13. A media mill of claim 12 wherein the impellers are magnetized to a magnetic flux density of at least about 100 Gauss.
- 14. A media mill of claim 12 wherein the impellers are magnetized to a magnetic flux density of at least about 1000 Gauss.
- 15. A media mill of claim 1 wherein the media are magnetized by a substantially spatially uniform, time variant magnetic source.
- 16. A media mill of claim 1 wherein the media are magnetized by a substantially spatially non-uniform, time invariant magnetic source.
- 17. A media mill of claim 1 wherein the media are magnetized by a substantially spatially non-uniform, time variant magnetic source.
- 18. A media mill of claim 1 wherein the media are magnetized to a magnetization intensity of at least about 25 Gauss.
- 19. A media mill of claim 1 wherein the average intensity of magnetization of the media is less than the amount which will cause the media to assume a locked configuration.
- 20. A media mill of claim 19 wherein the media is steel and the average intensity of magnetization of the media is less than about 500 Gauss.
- 21. A media mill of claim 1 wherein the media consist essentially of substantially spherical steel shot having a diameter of about from 0.1 to 3.0 mm.
- 22. A media mill of claim 1 wherein the media consist essentially of magnetizable ceramic.
- 23. A media mill of claim 22 wherein the ceramic comprises zirconium compounds.
- 24. A media mill of claim 22 wherein the ceramic consists essentially of at least one compound selected from zirconia silicates.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application Ser. No. 07/346,877 filed May 3, 1989, now abandoned.
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
2416746 |
Gavin |
Mar 1947 |
|
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Date |
Country |
888641 |
Jul 1949 |
DEX |
906613 |
Feb 1982 |
SUX |
1066644 |
Jan 1984 |
SUX |
Continuation in Parts (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
346877 |
May 1989 |
|