Patent Grant
7701756
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a memory device, and more particularly, to a memory device using magnetic memory elements.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
The rapid growth in the portable consumer product market (including the products for portable computing and communications) is driving the need for low power consumption non-volatile memory devices, with their inherent ability to retain stored information without power.
The principal technology currently available in the marketplace for these applications is EEPROM (Electrically Eraseable Programmable Read-Only Memory) technology, relying on charging (writing) or discharging (erasing) the floating-gate of a Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (N-type) type transistor using so-called Fowler-Nordheim tunneling through the ultra-thin oxide layer of these structures. The charging of the gate creates results in an electron inversion channel in the device rendering it conductive (constituting a memory state 1). Discharging the floating gate (i.e., applying a negative bias) removes the electron from the channel and returns the device to its initial non-conductive state (i.e., memory state 0). One serious limitation to this technology is related to tunneling that limits the erase/write cycle endurance and can induce catastrophic breakdown (after a maximum of about 106 cycles). Moreover, the required charging time—which is of the order of 1 ms—is relatively long.
In order to improve performance, so-called FeRAM (Ferroelectric Random Access Memory) technology has been developed. The FeRAM memory cell consists of a bi-stable capacitor, and is comprised of a ferroelectric thin film that contains polarizable electric dipoles. These dipoles, analogous to the magnetic moments in a ferroemagnetic material, respond to an applied electric field to create a net polarization in the direction of the applied field. A hysteresis loop for sweeping the applied field from positive to negative field defines the characteristics of the material. On removing the applied field, the ferroelectric material can retain a polarization known as the remnant polarization, serving as the basis for storing information in a non-volatile fashion. FeRAM would appear to be a promising technology with good future potential since relatively low voltages (typically about 5V) are required for switching as compared with about 12 to 15V for EEPROM. Moreover, FeRAM devices show 108 to 1010 cycle write endurance compared with about 106 for EEPROM, and the switching of the electrical polarization requires as little as about 100 ns compared with about 1 ms for charging an EEPROM. However, the need for an additional cycle to return a given bit to its original state for reading purposes aggravates the problems of dielectric fatigue. This, in turn, is characterized by degradation in the ability to polarize the material. In addition, owing to the behavior of these materials about their Curie temperature, as well as compositional stability (and associated changes in Curie temperature), even moderate thermal cycling promotes accelerated fatigue. Finally, fabrication process uniformity and control still remains a challenge.
Today, MRAM (Magnetoresistance Random Access Memory)—whose development began some 20 years ago—appears to hold the greatest promise for existing technologies in terms of read/write endurance cycle and speed. The technology relies on a writing process that uses the hysteresis loop of a ferromagnetic strip, while the reading process involves the anisotropic magnetoresistance effect. Basically, this effect (based on spin-orbit interaction) relates to the variation of the resistance of a magnetic conductor, dependent on an external applied magnetic field. The bit consists of a strip of two ferromagnetic films (e.g., NiFe) sandwiching a poor conductor (e.g., TaN), placed underneath an orthogonal conductive strip line (i.e., known as the word line). For writing, a current passes through the sandwich strip and when aided by a current in the orthogonal strip-line, the uppermost ferromagnetic layer of the sandwich strip is magnetized either clockwise, or counterclockwise. Reading is performed by measuring the magneto-resistance of the sandwich structure (i.e., by passing a current). Magneto-resistance ratios of only about 0.5% are typical, but have allowed the fabrication of a 16 Kb MRAM chip operating with write times of 100 ns (and read times of 250 ns). A 250 Kb chip was also later produced by Honeywell.
The discovery of so-called Giant Magneto-resistance (GMR) in 1989, implemented by sandwiching a copper layer with a magnetic thin film permitted further improvement in memory device performance. The GMR structures showed a magneto-resistance of about 6%, but the exchange between the magnetic layers limited how quickly the magnetization could change direction. Moreover magnetization curling from the edge of the strip imposed a limitation on the reduction in the cell size, or scaling.
Promising results were then obtained with the so called Pseudo-Spin Valve (PSV) cell made of a sandwich structure with two magnetic layers mismatched so that one layer tends to switch magnetization at a lower field than the other. The soft film is used to sense (by the magnetoresistance effect) the magnetization of the hard film—this latter film constitutes the storage media, having magnetization of either up or down (i.e., states 0 or 1). PSV structures are amenable to scaling but the reported fields required to switch the hard magnetic layer are still too high for high density integrated circuits. These devices appear to potentially represent a replacement for EEPROMs.
Further improvements in magnetoresistance (i.e., up to 40%) are obtained with spin-dependent tunneling devices (SDT). These devices are made of an insulating layer (i.e., the tunneling barrier) sandwiched between two magnetic layers. Device operation relies on the fact that the tunneling resistance, in the direction perpendicular to the stack, depends on the magnetization of the magnetic layers. The highest resistance is obtained when the magnetization of the layers is anti-parallel, and the parallel case provides the lowest resistance. The variation of spin (i.e., up or down) state density between the two magnetic layers explains this behavior. One of the layers is pinned while the second magnetic layer is free and used as the information storage media. SDT show promise for high performance non-volatile applications. Indeed there have been some reported values for write times as small as 14 ns with this approach. However, controlling the resistance uniformity (i.e., the tunneling barrier thickness and quality), and hence controlling the switching behavior from bit to bit remains a real challenge that has yet to be overcome in practical implementation. What is needed is a non-volatile memory device that is fast, reliable, relatively simple in design, inexpensive, and robust.
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a magnetic memory device that substantially obviates one or more of the problems due to limitations and disadvantages of the related art.
An object of the present invention is to provide a magnetic switch used to form a memory cell in a non-volatile magnetic memory device.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a simplified method of fabricating a non-volatile magnetic memory device.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description that follows and, in part, will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims herein as well as the appended drawings.
To achieve these and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described, a sensing device includes a sensor, a control unit, an input/output (I/O) interface, and a non-volatile magnetic memory device having one or more memory cells, each of the memory cells, wherein each memory cell of the non-volatile magnetic memory device includes a magnetic switch including a magnetic component and a write coil located proximate the magnetic component, the write coil coupled to receive a current sufficient to create a remnant magnetic polarity in the magnetic component, and a Hall sensor, positioned proximate the magnetic component, to detect the remnant magnetic polarity indicative of a stored data bit.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The present invention is directed to a magnetic memory device. In particular,
In particular, the magnetic switch 120 includes a magnetic component 122. The magnetic component 122 may be a permanent magnet or a ferromagnetic material (e.g., nickel or nickel-iron magnet). A coaxial coil 124 (connected to a current source, not shown) is disposed about the magnetic component 122. The coaxial coil 124 is made of a conductive material, such as the metal Ti/Au. However, any other suitable conductive material (e.g., Ti/Cu/Ti) may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention. Although magnetic component 122 is shown as having a generally cylindrical shape for purposes of illustration, any suitable shape (e.g., square, rectangle, horseshoe) may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, coaxial coil 124 is shown for purposes of illustration as having six (6) turns around magnetic component 122. However, any suitable number of turns may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The Hall Effect sensor 132 includes a geometrically defined semiconductor structure with input terminals 134 connected to power supply 138 and output terminals 136 positioned perpendicularly to the direction of current flow. Although the Hall Effect sensor 132 is shown as having a “Greek cross” shape for purposes of illustration, any suitable shape (e.g., rectangle) may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention.
In general, the Hall Effect sensor responds to a physical quantity to be sensed (i.e., magnetic induction) through an input interface and, in turn, outputs the sensed signal to an output interface that converts the electrical signal from the Hall Effect sensor into a designated indicator. In the present case, when the Hall Effect sensor 132 is subjected to a magnetic field (H) from a magnetic component 122, a potential difference appears across the output terminals 136 in proportion to the field strength. When the Hall Effect sensor 132 is subjected to an equal and opposite magnetic field, an equal and opposite potential difference appears across the same output terminals 136. The Hall Effect sensor 132 thus acts as a sensor of both the magnitude and direction of an externally applied magnetic field.
In general, the shape and material used for magnetic switch 120 determines the strength of magnetization (M) responsible for generating a magnetic field (H) around sensor 130. The number of turns of the coil 124 around magnetic component 122, in conjunction with the current (I) applied to the coil 124, determines the strength of the induced magnetization (H) generated around magnetic component 122 to set the direction and intensity of the magnetization (M). The direction of the magnetization (M) of magnetic component 122 determines the value of the magnetic stored data (i.e., “0” or “1”) in magnetic switch 120. The Hall Effect sensor 132 is characterized by voltage signal VHall that is generated in response to the magnetic field (H) emanating from magnetic switch 120 detected at point P.
A current (I) (e.g., current pulse) is sent through the coil 124 in such a way as to generate a magnetic field Hcoil. The magnitude of the current is chosen to be sufficient to change (i.e., flip) the magnetization of the magnetic component 122. The magnetic field generated by the magnetic component 122 needs to be sufficient for the sensor 130 to detect it at detection point P. After detection, sensor 130 needs to generate a response (VHall) greater than an offset voltage signal VOff. An offset voltage Voff is the threshold that must be overcome before any useful signals are generated. More specifically, the magnetic field (H) generated by the magnetization (M) of magnetic switch 120 must be strong enough at point P to generate an induced voltage in sensor 130 greater than VOff before the stored data can be accurately detected. A magnetic field that generates a voltage signal less than the offset voltage cannot be detected by the sensor 130 in the present DC bias conditions.
To then attain a downward magnetization (i.e., “0”), a suitable current (e.g., current pulse in the opposite direction) is again sent through the coil 224 to generate a magnetic field −Hcoil (i.e., with the opposite orientation than Hcoil) sufficient to change (i.e., flip) the magnetization of the magnetic component 222. After the pulse, the magnetic component 222 retains a magnetization that may have smaller magnitude or whose direction is oriented downward. In this case, the magnetic field at detection point P is the magnetic field generated by the magnetic component 222. The detected induction at point P causes the sensor 130 to generate a voltage signal that has a smaller magnitude or opposite sign indicating the direction of magnetization (e.g., a negative voltage for “downward”). If a downward or smaller magnetization is designated as “0,” then the sensor 130 detects the stored data as being “0.”
In another embodiment of the invention, a tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention ensures operational reliability of the fabricated magnetic memory device. In particular, the offset voltage threshold Voff as discussed above may be larger than expected. The offset of the sensor are caused by such things as non-uniformity of the device and misalignments that occur during fabrication. The magnetic induction (B) generated by the magnetization (M) of magnetic switch 120 must be strong enough at point P to generate an induced voltage in sensor 130 before the stored data can be accurately detected. Once the memory device containing an array of memory cells 10 is fabricated, the internal components cannot be rearranged to reduce the operating offset threshold Voff. To address this problem, a tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention ensures operational reliability of the fabricated magnetic memory device by allowing the detected magnetic field to be tuned after the fabrication process, as presented below.
As shown in
For purposes of illustration only, the direction of magnetization (M) of the magnetic component 322 is shown as initially being oriented downward, in the same direction as the constant bias field Hbias. After the current (I) is sent through the coil 324, the magnetic component 322 retains a high magnetization. In this case, the magnetic field proximate to the surface of the magnetic component 322, at detection point P, is the combination of the bias field Hbias and the field generated by the magnetic component 322. This combined field results in a very high magnetization state, generating a voltage signal much greater than the offset voltage Voff. Hence, the sensor 130 easily detects the stored data as being “1,” for example, assuming that the downward direction of magnetization (M) is designated as a high state (i.e., “1”).
To attain a low state (i.e., “0”), a suitable current (I) (i.e., current pulse) is sent through the coil 324 to generate a magnetic field −Hcoil in the opposite direction to the bias field Hbias sufficient to generate a total magnetic field (i.e., Hcoil+Hbias) that demagnetizes the magnetic component 322. After the current is sent through the coil 324, the magnetization (M) will recoil following the recoil line, explained further below in reference to
The switching behaviour shown schematically in
The fabrication process will now be explained with reference to
The Hall Effect sensor 132 is fabricated with high mobility materials, such as III-V materials (i.e., compounds formed from groups III and V elements of the periodic table). III-IV materials include, but are not limited to, GaAs, InAs, InSb, and related two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) structures. A 2DEG structure based on a GaAs/AIGaAs hetero-structure may be formed at the hetero junction interface of a modulation-doped hetero-structure between a doped wide band-gap AlGaAs material (i.e., barrier) and an undoped narrow band-gap GaAs material (i.e., well). Ionized carriers (from the dopant) transfer into the well, forming the 2DEG. These carriers are spatially separated from their ionized parent impurities and, therefore, allow for high carrier mobility and a large Hall Effect. Although only III-IV materials are discussed here, other materials (e.g., silicon) may be used to fabricate the Hall Effect sensor 132.
Following the etching process, the input terminals 134 and output terminals 136 (
Following the evaporation step, the lift-off process is completed by placing the wafer 538 in acetone in order to remove any unnecessary portions of the AuGe layer 544. After appropriate cleaning, the contacts (i.e., AuGe layer 544) undergo rapid thermal annealing (RTA). The annealing is carried out at about 340° C. for about 40 seconds in an RTA chamber filled in nitrogen (N2) flow. The lift-off process is completed by placing the wafer 538 in acetone in order to remove any unnecessary portions of the AuGe layer 544.
Although the resist PMMA 4% is used in the example above, any suitable resist, such as PMMA 2% may be used. Moreover, HMDS, an adhesion promoter, may be used as needed. When using PMMA 2% as the resist, the following lithography processing parameters may be used: PMMA (2%); exposure energy=15 kV; exposure dose=150 μC/cm2; developer=MBIK/IPA mixture (1:3); development time=25 seconds.
Once the Hall Effect sensor 132 is fabricated, an insulating layer 748 is spun onto the Hall Effect sensor 532. The insulating layer 748 is made of a suitable material, such as a dielectric polyimide, which may be processed as typical resists (i.e., spun onto a wafer and baked in an oven or on a hot plate). An example of a dielectric polyimide is HD Microsystem's PI2545 (an inter-metallic, high-temperature polyimide used in various microelectronic applications). It has a high glass transition temperature (i.e., about 400° C.) and may be patterned with positive resist. Moreover, the cured film is ductile and flexible with a low CTE, and is resistant to common wet and dry processing chemicals. Other suitable materials include silicon oxide and silicon nitride, which may be deposited through Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) at low temperatures.
For illustrative purposes only,
Once the insulating layer 748 is deposited, a positive resist layer 750 (e.g., PMMA 4% or AZ5206) is spun onto the insulating layer 748. For purposes of explanation, PMMA 4% is used. The resist layer 750 is then baked in an oven or hot plate at a temperature of 160° C. for two (2) minutes, with a ramp rate of 6° C./minute and a soak period of 6 minutes. A baking temperature of 160° C. is the minimum safe bake temperature for PMMA (e.g., PMMA baked at 120° C. may exhibit some adhesion failure).
Then, the wafer is placed into an EBL chamber, where it is exposed to 25 kV of electron beam. The resist layer 750 is patterned in such a way as to make openings over the Hall Effect sensor's ohmic contacts and alignment marks (if any). For a pattern of the size 9×10 μm2, an appropriate dose may be in the range of 165-182 μC/cm2; for a pattern of the size 17×17 μm2, an appropriate dose may be in the range of 149-163 μC/cm2; and for a pattern of the size 100×112 μm2, an appropriate dose may be in the range of 132-145 μC/cm2.
After exposure, the resist layer 750 is developed in a suitable solution, such as MIBK/alcohol (1:3), for a suitable amount of time (e.g., about 40-55 seconds). The wafer is then rinsed in alcohol and de-ionized water. Once the wafer is cleaned, a diluted PPD450 (1:5) solution is used for etching the insulating layer for a suitable amount of time (e.g., about 6-14 minutes or even longer). The degrees of dilution and agitation and the development and etching times may be changed as needed. Boiling acetone is used to remove the resist layer 750 (i.e., PMMA). Finally, to complete fabrication of the insulating layer 748, the insulating layer 748 is hard-baked at about 200° C. using a temperature ramp as described above. The insulating layer may be hard-baked at a temperature as high as 400° C. However, such high temperature may create unwanted diffusion in the Hall Effect sensor.
Once the sensor 130 is fabricated, the magnetic switch 120 is fabricated over the insulating layer 748. The general approach to fabricating the magnetic switch 120 is to first fabricate the coil 124, and then to fabricate the magnetic component 122. Traditional methods for fabricating magnetic materials (e.g., Alnico and Martensitic steel) involve synthesis routes that include, for example, melting different components, casting, and high temperature (typically, above 800° C.) thermal processing (e.g., quenching). Other synthesis routes include sintering and extrusion. These methods are incompatible with micro-technology or wafer-scale processing due to the extremely small sizes of the components.
Electroplating, on the other hand, allows for relatively good definition of element shapes with fewer defects on element walls. It is also an inexpensive and relatively simple process to implement. Three-electrode systems can be used to monitor the stoichiometry of deposited alloys.
Electroplating will be used in explaining the fabrication process of the magnetic switch 120; however, any suitable synthesis route may be utilized. As shown in
First, the coil and a magnet spot or area within the coil where the magnetic component is to be deposited are formed over the sensor 130. A first exemplary process for forming the coil and the magnet spot involves a titanium/gold lift-off process.
The insulating layer 748 (from
The wafer is placed into the EBL chamber, where the double resist layer 954 is exposed to an electron beam so as to pattern the coil 924 and magnet spot 923, with an exposure of 25 kV and various doses: for a fine coil pattern, an appropriate dose is 150 μC/cm2; for the magnet spot, an appropriate dose is 120 μC/cm2; for alignment marks (if any), an appropriate dose is 195 μC/cm2. The alignment marks can be included in the pattern to aid in the location of the magnet spot. The double resist layer 954 is then developed into a suitable solution, such as MIBK/alcohol, for about twenty (20) seconds.
After the patterning step, the wafer is placed into an electron beam evaporator, where titanium layer 952a and gold layer 952b of 25 nm and 150 nm, respectively, are deposited onto the patterns to form the Ti/Au layer 952. Titanium layer 952a is used as an adhesion layer. Finally, the wafer is removed from the evaporator and dipped into acetone for about one hour to remove the double resist layer 954 and any unwanted Ti/Au layers 952. As shown in
After depositing the coil 924, magnet spot 923, and alignment marks (not shown), the magnetic component 122 is electroplated onto the magnet spot 923 through a mold that provides the shape and dimensions of the magnetic component 122. As shown in
The wafer with the resist template is then placed into an electroplating cell 810 (
For illustrative purposes, a nickel chloride based solution with two additives, namely saccharin (which acts as a strain relief agent) and sodium lauryl sulfate (which acts as a surfactant), is deposited into the well 1060. A current, such as a DC current, is used to fabricate the magnet component. For an even smaller, higher aspect ratio structure, pulsed electro-deposition (with, e.g., a 2% duty cycle) may be used to deposit magnetic material (e.g., nickel or nickel-iron) onto the resist template to form an array of magnetic component 122. The electroplating conditions are controlled by the computer-driven potentiostat/galvanostat 830. Although the shape of the magnet is cylindrical, any shape (e.g., rectangle, square) may be developed using the above technique. After electro-deposition, the mold (i.e., thick resist layer 1058) is removed using a suitable solution, such as acetone.
Once magnetic switch 120 has been completed, further processing steps may be implemented to fabricate the tunable magnetic switch as shown in
Although EBL is used as the exemplary method for fabricating the mold, any suitable method, such as photolithography, may be used. For example, when using photolithography, the mold is formed by exposing the resist layer (i.e., AZ4620) to UV light through a suitable prefabricated hard mask.
Another approach to fabricating the coil 924 and magnet spot 923 involves etching directly the seed layer 952 so as to obtain the coil 924 and the magnet spot 923 in the same process step as shown in
The wafer is dried by baking it on a hot plate for about 30 minutes at about 150° C. A layer of resist 1210 (e.g., AZ5206E) is spun onto the wafer. The resist layer 1210 is soft-baked, starting from about 95° C. and then lowered to about 80° C., the change in temperature time being about six (6) to seven (7) minutes. The resist layer 1210 is then exposed (e.g., exposure energy=about 10 kV; dose=about 6 μC/cm2). After exposure, the wafer is developed in a suitable solution, such as PPD450. The wafer is then cleaned with de-ionized water. After the cleaning step, the wafer is hard-baked for about 10 minutes at about 125° C. The titanium (Ti) and copper (Cu) layers are etched with suitable solutions. For example, the Ti layers 952a and 952c may be etched with a highly diluted HF/HNO3/H2O solution, while the copper layer 952b may be etched with a HCl/H2O2/H2O solution. The wafer is then cleaned to remove resist 1210. The cleaning step can include, for example, boiling acetone, boiling alcohol, and de-ionized water rinsing. Once the coil 924 and magnet spot 923 have been etched directly into the seed layer 952, the wafer undergoes the process for creating the mold for electroplating the magnetic component as described above.
The magnetic memory device according to the present invention was described in relation to a magnetic switch over a Hall Effect sensor. In particular, the advantages of a magnetic component that can retain a magnetic field without any power supplied thereto and a simple sensor for reading the stored magnetic field provides a non-volatile memory device that consumes very little power for operation compared to the electric-based memory devices currently in use.
Additionally, the tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention was described. The advantages of the tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention are numerous. First, because the magnetic component retains the induced magnetization (M) from the induction coil, the tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention can function as a switch with non-volatile memory.
Second, the tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention provides a sufficiently high field for the Hall Effect sensor so as to partially or even completely compensate for the sensor offset. In the case of the former, the tunability of the magnetic switch according to the present invention, i.e., the bias field may be adjusted relative to the sensor offset, allows for a larger tolerance of fabrication constraints, makes fabrication much easier, and increases reliability of the devices. This is a considerable asset for miniaturization as the sensor offset increases as size of the devices are scaled downward.
Yet another significant advantage of this approach is that the tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention allows usage of low aspect ratio magnets, which are much easier to fabricate, since the bias field compensates for the demagnetization of the magnetic component of the memory cell. The tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention was described in relation to a magnetic memory device using Hall Effect sensors. However, the tunable magnetic switch according to the present invention may be applied with other magnetic memory devices as the bias magnetic field used for tuning the magnetic switch may be applied to any magnetic component and sensor configuration.
The magnetic memory device according to the present invention has various applications including, but not limited to, radio frequency identification tags (RFIDs), personal digital assistants (PDAs), cellular phones, and other computing devices. For instance, the magnetic memory device according to the present invention has uses for aerospace/defense, sensors, and RFID applications. The magnetic random access memory of the present invention has been developed for low density radiation hard applications. The magnetic random access memory of the present invention is non-volatile, read/write addressable, and fabricated from radiation hard materials. The applicable and emerging markets include aerospace and defense, such as rad-hard military and radar systems, satellite, and security applications, sensors, and RFID. Sensors in automotive applications, medial equipment like bioelectronics, biosensors, and gas/liquid/energy metering, and seismic monitoring for oil and gas exploration, for example, are all envisioned as potential uses for the present invention. Future growth and technical evolution is anticipated in the pervasive computing, PDA, and display markets as well.
In an exemplary embodiment, the magnetic memory devices in accordance with the present invention are adapted to be used with sensors in harsh environments, such as down holes in an oil field. For example, a magnetic memory device in accordance with the present invention may be used in environments having temperature ranges around 175-220° C., pressures up to 20,000 psi, and extreme g-force conditions. Accordingly, a magnetic memory device having a hall effect sensing device in accordance with the present invention coupled to an environmental and/or chemical sensor may be used to sense down hole conditions in drilling fluid and other environmental conditions. The sensed chemical/environmental data may be stored in the magnetic memory device of the present invention with the assurance that the data will not be corrupted due to environmental factors that may affect the memory device.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the tunable magnetic switch of the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
The present invention claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/752,035 filed Dec. 21, 2005 and No. 60/780,841 filed Mar. 10, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3131381 | Bradley, Jr. | Apr 1964 | A |
| 3343084 | Gambale et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3418643 | Bradley, Jr. | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3551904 | Tomaszewski et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3818465 | Wiegand | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3908194 | Romankiw | Sep 1975 | A |
| 4238837 | DeLuca et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4316263 | Doyle | Feb 1982 | A |
| 5045793 | Rathke | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5068826 | Matthews | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5075247 | Matthews | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5150338 | Birecki et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5251170 | Daughton et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5289410 | Katti et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5295097 | Lienau | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5329480 | Wu et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5420819 | Pohm | May 1995 | A |
| 5424236 | Daughton et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5504699 | Goller et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5569544 | Daughton | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5595830 | Daughton | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5617071 | Daughton | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5636159 | Pohm | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5687217 | Bliss et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5729137 | Daughton et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5768180 | Pohm | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5831426 | Black, Jr. et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5892708 | Pohm | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5949707 | Pohm et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966322 | Pohm et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6021065 | Daughton et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6072382 | Daughton et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6147900 | Pohm | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6153318 | Rothberg | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6168860 | Daughton | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6169689 | Naji | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6229729 | Lienau | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6252390 | Black, Jr. et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6275411 | Daughton et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6279406 | Li et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6300617 | Daughton et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6340886 | Daughton et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6341080 | Lienau et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6349053 | Daughton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6391483 | Zhu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6404191 | Daughton et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6404671 | Reohr et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6413659 | Rothberg | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6437558 | Li et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6462541 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6483741 | Iwasaki et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6510080 | Farrar | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6535416 | Daughton et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6538921 | Daughton et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6552932 | Cernea | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6583629 | Stokes et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6657431 | Xiao | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6657888 | Doudin et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6674664 | Pohm | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6711053 | Tang | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6713195 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6714445 | Farrar | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6724652 | Deak | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6743639 | Tondra et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6744086 | Daughton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6751147 | Smith et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6774391 | Cowburn | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6777730 | Daughton et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6791792 | Takahashi | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795340 | Sakimura et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6809515 | Li et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6809516 | Li et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6826086 | Smith et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6833278 | Deak | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6836137 | Hartmann | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6839273 | Odagawa et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6872467 | Qian et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6875621 | Tondra | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6894920 | Kim et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6920064 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6985383 | Tang et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6987692 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7027319 | Anthony et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7039443 | Opela et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7238541 | Berndt et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7376007 | Stephenson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 20010017543 | Daughton et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020060567 | Tondra | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020146580 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020171100 | Pohm | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030007395 | Stephenson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030007398 | Daughton et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030048676 | Daughton et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013880 | Daughton et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023065 | Daughton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042258 | Witcraft et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040115478 | Qian et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125673 | Daughton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137275 | Jander et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202018 | Witcraft et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259271 | Tondra | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002267 | Daughton et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050127916 | Tondra | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20060164077 | Mehnert et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0910092 | Apr 1999 | EP |
| 1 028 474 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 2003-022428 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2003-142752 | May 2003 | JP |
| 9503899 | Feb 1994 | WO |
| WO 0233705 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070171695 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60752035 | Dec 2005 | US | |
| 60780841 | Mar 2006 | US |
