A long invention history of prior art is based around Faraday's Law and Lenz's Law of electromagnetic induction for producing electrical power by applications of electrical generators based on these laws. The size and sophistication of these devices have been enhanced and made more predictable to reduce size with increase power by the advent of rare earth magnets such as Neodymium types. The present invention in its novelty takes advantage of these improvements and utilizes novel designs to reduce size with generating enough power and with enough time duration to power short burst radio micro-transmitters that can be used for battery-less and wireless switching applications that have operating frequencies that are within the allowable bandwidths and durations associated with ISM Band FCC approved short burst radio transmission.
One of the intents of this invention is to teach that, by utilizing the intensified magnitude of the magnetic flux of rare earth magnets such as Neodymium, but not limited to conventional Neodymium magnet structures, is that electrical energy by a novel arrangement of a plurality of magnets disposed within and around a coil can produce electrical power. One embodiment of this invention is having disposed three cylindrical magnets, but not limited to cylindrical magnets, that are diametrically poled North and South (such that on one half of each cylinder magnet there exists a North pole and on the opposite side of each cylinder magnet a South pole exists), and where classically intrinsic magnetic flux lines are formed from exiting the North pole and entering the South pole to form closed loops of magnetic lines of force, whose field intensity varies mathematically as the reciprocal of the cube of the distance (1/d3) away from each pole to any point beyond the pole in an omnidirectional paradigm, and whose instant effect are resultant three dimensional tensors with a defined set of basis vectors.
Another intention of this invention is to teach that by utilizing the intensified magnitude of the magnetic flux of rare earth magnets such as Neodymium, but not limited to conventional Neodymium magnet structures, is that electrical energy by a novel arrangement of a plurality of magnets disposed within and around a coil can produce electrical power. Another embodiment of this invention is having disposed three rectangular (non-cylindrical) magnets, but not limited to three rectangular (non-cylindrical) magnets, that are diametrically poled North and South such that on one half of each of the three rectangular (non-cylindrical) magnets there exists a North pole and on the opposite side of this three rectangular (non-cylindrical) magnet a South pole exists and where classically intrinsic magnetic flux lines are formed from exiting the North pole and entering the South pole to form closed loops of magnetic lines of force, whose field intensity varies mathematically as the reciprocal of the cube (1/d3) of the distance away from each pole to any point beyond the pole in an omnidirectional paradigm, and whose instant effect are resultant three dimensional tensors with a defined set of basis vectors.
Another intention of the present invention is to teach that precise alignment of three separate magnets of choice that are in-line with each other, in assembly, that are disposed as the first magnet (active master control magnet) that is diametrically poled and is free to rotate on its axis, but not limited to diametric poling and could be axially poled, is identified as the master control rotatable magnet and is disposed abut to the outside of a coil that is wound either clockwise or counter-clockwise in a two-dimensional X-Y plane with an accumulated wound depth in the Z plane. The abutment of the first control magnet to one of the outside regions of the coil is to obtain the maximum magnetic flux lines per square area.
There also exists in this three-magnet assembly, a second magnetically coupled rotation dependent magnet of choice that is in-line and is centered within the coil and is free to rotate on its axis of rotation; and this second magnet is identified as the first magnetically dependent magnet, whose rotation within the coil is dependent on the instant rotation of the first master control magnet. Ergo, any rotational change in the first master control magnet magnetically and rotationally influences the second magnetically coupled rotation dependent magnet within the coil.
There also exists in this three-magnet in-line assembly, a third magnet of choice that is in-line and disposed abut on the opposite inline side of the coil relative to the first abutted master control magnet. This third magnetically coupled rotation dependent magnet is disposed about the coil's outside wound region.
The complete operation of the three rotational magnet in-line assembly is that when a finger of a user, or another external object, swipes a toggle paddle of an enclosure containing the first master control magnet that is disposed within the enclosure, the first master control magnet rotates momentarily. All three in-line assembly magnets are designed and situated so that they are all magnetically coupled, and all three magnets are pole positioned and in-line attractive so that the poles of each magnet faces a neighboring opposite magnetic pole. The example arrangement is: the first magnet with its North and South poles face North to South attractive to the second magnet, and the second magnet with its North and South poles face North to South attractive to the third magnet. When the first master control magnet rotates counter-clockwise, the second magnet within the coil rotates clockwise, and instantly the third magnet rotates in the counter-clockwise direction; and when the first master control magnet moves clockwise, the second magnet within the coil moves counter-clockwise, and the third magnet moves clockwise.
During a triggering of the toggle paddle enclosure that the first master control magnet is contained in, the magnet rotates in either a clockwise or counter-clockwise rotation, inducing a voltage across the end terminals of the coil because the action of the first master control magnet's movement has its intrinsic magnetic field attracted with field lines between the first magnet's North pole and second magnets South pole and the field lines of the second magnet's North pole and third magnets South pole, which provides changes in the magnetic field intensity within the coil and by Faraday's Law induces a voltage across the end terminals of the coil. The angular displacement is not limited to 0-45 degrees of rotation, the range can vary from 0 to 90 degrees; and in other embodiments here could be a complete 360-degree rotation for singular displacement, displacement with periodic rotate start and rotate stop with varying time durations or continuous periodic rotation for long durations.
In accordance with Faraday's Law of induction, which is a basic law of electromagnetism, predicting how a magnetic field will interact with an electric circuit (coil) to produce an electromotive force ϵ (EMF, voltage)—a phenomenon called electromagnetic induction;
And Lenz's Law, which states that the current induced in a circuit due to a change or a motion in a magnetic field is so directed as to oppose the change in flux and to exert a mechanical force opposing the motion.
Ergo, Faraday's Law describes the induced voltage across the coil end terminals, and Lenz's Law describes not only the induced voltage but also the magnetic force that acts like magnetic force springs in the present invention.
Lenz's law is shown by the negative sign in Faraday's law of induction:
which indicates that the induced EMF ϵ and the change in magnetic flux
have opposite signs. It is a qualitative law that specifies the direction of induced current but says nothing about its magnitude; that is described by Faraday's Law.
Lenz's law explains the direction of many effects in electromagnetism, such as the direction of voltage induced in an inductor or wire loop by a changing current, or why eddy currents exert a drag force on moving objects in a magnetic field; the present invention utilizes the drag force in addition to the primary source of spring action provided by the attractive forces summed between the first rotatable master control magnet and the second servant rotatable center disposed in coil magnet, and the second servant rotatable center disposed in coil magnet and the third rotatable servant magnet; and also to act as spring action on the master control magnet to cause it to back rotate upon its initial forward movement caused by an external applied force. If the initial external applied force on the master control magnet is forward (clockwise), the eddy current in the coil plus the summed attractive forces of the magnetic fields encompassed all magnets momentarily repels the master control magnet backward (counter-clockwise); and if the external applied force on the master control magnet is backward (counter-clockwise), the eddy current in the coil plus the summed attractive forces of the magnetic fields surrounding all magnets momentarily repels the master control magnet forward.
The combination of all three magnets and their associated encompassed magnetic fields that pass through the coil winding represents the total magnetic flux field Ø and the rate at which the master control rotatable magnet is triggered determines the amount of the induced voltage (EMF, ϵ) stated mathematically as:
In the present embodiment the operation of the generator can be of two different modes. In the first mode the operation is a total reciprocating rotational movement of the first master control magnet made to function this way by keeping the third servant magnet in a non-rotational state; this feature establishes a momentarily non-latched state for the toggling of the first master control magnet, so when it is triggered by the tangent toggle actuator, the first magnet oscillates for a few cycles before friction from the axles of the magnet diminishes motion.
In the second mode of the present embodiment the operation of the generator can be made to act in a stayed state condition whereby if the third servant magnet is free to rotate, then when the first master control magnet is flipped by an external force, as its North pole is rotated clockwise the second servant center magnet will turn in the opposite direction counter-clockwise so that its South pole faces the first magnets North pole; and the third servant will turn in the clockwise direction so that its South pole faces the North pole of the second servant magnet and will hold the second center magnet in that locked position and so the first master control magnet will be cocked and locked until an external force is applied to un-cock and un-lock the first magnet and remain in the new state until acted upon in the opposite state; otherwise known as a FLIP-FLOP device or toggle switch. In each mode electrical energy is produced.
The present invention can be of a plurality of magnet configurations and plurality of magnet placements, and these placements as described are not limited to in-line, and could be non-in-line.
Another embodiment of the present invention could be with diametrically poled elongated polygon magnets; and another embodiment could be with axially poled cylinder magnets; and another embodiment could be with axially poled polygon magnets.
In all embodiments of the present invention where all three magnets are in any configuration and all here are free to rotate, all three of these magnets are set into rotational motion simultaneously by action of the attractive interlinking of their respective magnetic fields. In all embodiments of the present invention where the third servant magnet is fixed and not free to rotate, the remaining two magnets are free to rotate and do so simultaneously by action of the attractive interlinking of their respective magnetic fields.
With the present invention in a plurality of embodiments, the common factors that describe the mathematical signature of all possible embodiments envisioned that produce electrical energy are; (1) the effects of intrinsic residual magnetic pole field intensity of each magnet, (2) the distance between magnets, (3) the number of turns in the coil, and (4) the gauge of the wire (as a current limiting factor associated with the wire's internal specific resistance). This mathematical signature further describes the amplitude of the induced voltage, the current limiting, and the frequency of the induced voltage that has a damped sinusoidal or near sinusoidal waveform. The intensity of the magnetic pole field is directly proportional to the induced voltage.
The present inventions may be better understood in accordance with the following exemplary figures, in which:
In
In
Also, in
In
In the side view of
In
ϵ the induced voltage at the coil terminals 35T and − (the minus sign) indicates any induced current in a coil will result in a magnetic flux that is opposite to the original changing flux.
N The number of turns in the coil winding 35.
BA is the product magnetic field (B) times the area (A)
That changes in a time differential range.
In
In the side view of
In
ϵ the induced voltage at the terminals 35T and − (the minus sign) indicates any induced current in a coil will result in a magnetic flux that is opposite to the original changing flux.
N The number of turns in the coil winding 35.
BA is the product magnetetic field (B) times the area (A)
That changes in a time differential range.
In
Both
In
In the
The substrate 169 in
By desired design convention of this embodiment in
The embodiment in
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/578,612, filed Oct. 30, 2017, and entitled “MAGNETIC MOMENTUM TRANSFER GENERATOR”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1711323 | Oglesby | Apr 1929 | A |
2703370 | Steensen | Mar 1955 | A |
3027499 | Holdway | Mar 1962 | A |
3218523 | Eugene | Nov 1965 | A |
3315104 | Barr | Apr 1967 | A |
3348080 | Lair | Oct 1967 | A |
3398302 | Hans-dieter et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3500082 | Tolegian | Mar 1970 | A |
3621419 | Adams et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3671777 | Newell | Jun 1972 | A |
3673999 | Lacy et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3895244 | Link | Jul 1975 | A |
3984707 | McClintock | Oct 1976 | A |
4187452 | Knappe et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4257010 | Bergman et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4260901 | Woodbridge | Apr 1981 | A |
4315197 | Studer | Feb 1982 | A |
4363980 | Petersen | Dec 1982 | A |
4412355 | Terbrack et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4471353 | Cernik | Sep 1984 | A |
4521712 | Braun et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4703293 | Ono et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4752706 | Meszaros | Jun 1988 | A |
4855699 | Hoegh | Aug 1989 | A |
4866321 | Blanchard et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4870306 | Petersen | Sep 1989 | A |
5053659 | Parker | Oct 1991 | A |
5183056 | Dalen et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5204570 | Gerfast | Apr 1993 | A |
5275141 | Tsunoda | Jan 1994 | A |
5499013 | Konotchick | Mar 1996 | A |
5608366 | Sako | Mar 1997 | A |
5808381 | Aoyama | Sep 1998 | A |
5872407 | Kitaoka | Feb 1999 | A |
5990583 | Nanba | Nov 1999 | A |
6069420 | Mizzi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6259372 | Taranowski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6326714 | Bandera | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6630894 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6659176 | Mahadevaiah | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6700310 | Maue et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720681 | Hsiao | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720682 | Hatam-tabrizi et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6879076 | Long | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7015778 | Fukushima et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021603 | Wygnaski | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7026900 | Gregory et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7106159 | Delamare | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7151332 | Kundel | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7315098 | Kunita et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7378765 | Iwasa | May 2008 | B2 |
7382106 | Kundel | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7400069 | Kundel | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7436082 | Ruse et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7495656 | Yuba | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7688036 | Yarger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7710227 | Schmidt | May 2010 | B2 |
7906877 | Okada et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7906920 | Imagawa | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8148856 | Bataille et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8299659 | Bartol, Jr. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8330283 | Lin | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8514040 | Gruner | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8539765 | Miller | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8624447 | Cartier Millon | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629572 | Phillips | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8633604 | Miller | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8633605 | Esteve Tinto et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8729747 | Arnold et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8773226 | Li et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8816557 | Long et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8907505 | Fortier et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9303628 | Fortier et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9343931 | Deak et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9543817 | Deak, Sr. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9673683 | Deak, Sr. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9843248 | Deak, Sr. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9923443 | Deak, Sr. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10270301 | Deak, Sr. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10348160 | Deak, Sr. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10396642 | Petrick | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10523098 | Bowen | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10707706 | Yu | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10855158 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20010045785 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020070712 | Arul | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020130561 | Temesvary et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020190610 | Andre et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025416 | Sullivan | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030155771 | Cheung | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030197433 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040051416 | Yamada et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078662 | Hamel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040124729 | Long | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128781 | Kunita | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174287 | Deak | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050006961 | Shen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023905 | Sakamoto | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050168108 | Face | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050280316 | Nozawa | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060237968 | Chandrasekaran | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244316 | Kundel | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060244327 | Kundel | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267418 | Kundel | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080048506 | Deak | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080079319 | Okada | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20110001381 | McDaniel | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110254285 | Hanchett, Jr. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110273052 | Long et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130033042 | Fortier | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130088018 | Kobayashi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093540 | Ruff | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130342037 | Kawarai | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140375164 | Deak et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150015104 | Kataoka et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150076832 | Fortier et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150091395 | Spivak | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150091479 | Spivak | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150279598 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150357893 | Deak, Sr. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160134173 | Deak, Sr. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160204665 | Deak, Sr. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160359401 | Deak, Sr. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170077794 | Deak, Sr. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170346377 | Deak, Sr. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180145561 | Deak, Sr. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190131098 | Deak, Sr. | May 2019 | A1 |
20210143719 | Deak, Sr. | May 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201490855 | May 2010 | CN |
203166718 | Aug 2013 | CN |
106992649 | Jul 2017 | CN |
3218181 | Nov 1983 | DE |
102006013237 | Oct 2007 | DE |
102010017874 | Oct 2011 | DE |
0948018 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1936787 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2079154 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2178738 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2272742 | Jan 2011 | EP |
13772599.0 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2834907 | Feb 2015 | EP |
15857253.7 | Dec 2015 | EP |
3059850 | Aug 2016 | EP |
3215726 | Sep 2017 | EP |
18874872.7 | Oct 2018 | EP |
3704785 | Sep 2020 | EP |
H11-264368 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2009261204 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2011130654 | Jun 2011 | JP |
9628873 | Sep 1996 | WO |
0122587 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0237516 | May 2002 | WO |
2009015910 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2013031127 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013035057 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013151631 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2016074003 | May 2016 | WO |
2018057957 | Oct 2018 | WO |
PCTUS2018057957 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2019089435 | May 2019 | WO |
2021102316 | May 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,461, filed Feb. 25, 2013, Electrical Generator with Rotaional Gaussian Surface Magnet and Stationary Coil. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,971, filed May 19, 2015, Hollow Magnetic Metal Core Pulse Energy Harvesting Generator. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,335, filed Nov. 29, 2016, Hollow Magnetic Metal Core Pulse Energy Harvesting Generator. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,498, filed Nov. 7, 2014, Reciprocating Magnet Electrical Generator. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,714, filed Jun. 4, 2015, Rocker Action Electric Generator. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/074,551, filed Mar. 18, 2016, Electrical Generator with Rotational Gaussian Surface Magnet and Stationary Coil. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,167, filed May 23, 2017, Tangentially Actuated Electrical Generator. |
U.S. Appl No. 15/358,625, filed Nov. 22, 2016, Rotationally Activated Generator. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/938,653, filed Nov. 21, 2019, Tangentially Actuated Magnetic Momentum Transfer Generator. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/718,308, filed Nov. 20, 2003, Self-Contained Switch. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/890,112, filed Aug. 3, 2007, Electromotive Device. |
Extended supplementary European Search Report issued in European Application No. 13772599.0, dated Oct. 31, 2016, 19 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2018/057957, dated May 14, 2020, 5 pages. |
International Search Report received for PCT Patent International Application No. PCT/US2007/017325, dated Aug. 7, 2008, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in European Application No. 13772599.0, dated Jun. 30, 2017, 12 pages. |
Office Action issued in European Application No. 13772599.0, dated Nov. 17, 2017, 4 pages. |
Partial supplementary European Search Report issued in European Application No. 13772599.0, dated Jul. 1, 2016, 7 pages. |
https://www.google.com/search?q=magnetic+interaction&biw=1920&bih=1115&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=OahUKEwjby5SLtuHKAhUCOWMKHaQUDb4Q_AUIBigB#imgrc=rCMVDdr681uSXM%3A. |
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2018/057957 dated Feb. 25, 2019, 3 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 188748727, dated Jul. 8, 2021, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/061590, dated Feb. 25, 2021, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190131098 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62578612 | Oct 2017 | US |