All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
This disclosure relates generally to methods and apparatus for transmitting and receiving power wirelessly, and in various respects, mechanical circulatory support.
Powered devices need to have a mechanism to supply power to the operative parts. Typically systems use a physical power cable to transfer energy over a distance. There has been a continuing need for systems that can transmit power efficiently over a distance without physical structures bridging the physical gap.
Systems and methods that supply power without electrical wiring are sometimes referred to as wireless energy transmission (WET). Wireless energy transmission greatly expands the types of applications for electrically powered devices. One such example is the field of implantable medical devices. Implantable medical devices typically require an internal power source able to supply adequate power for the reasonable lifetime of the device or an electrical cable that traverses the skin. Typically an internal power source (e.g., battery) is feasibly for only low power devices like sensors. Likewise, a transcutaneous power cable significantly affects quality of life (QoL), infection risk, and product life, among many drawbacks.
More recently there has been an emphasis on systems that supply power to an implanted device without using transcutaneous wiring. This is sometimes referred to as a Transcutaneous Energy Transfer System (TETS). Frequently energy transfer is accomplished using two magnetically coupled coils set up like a transformer so power is transferred magnetically across the skin. Conventional systems are relatively sensitive to variations in position and alignment of the coils. In order to provide constant and adequate power, the two coils need to be physically close together and well aligned.
Existing systems that transmit power wirelessly based on magnetic fields typically operate either in the near-field only, where the separation of the transmitter and receiver coils is less than the dimension of the coils, or in mid-range, where the separation is comparable to the coil dimensions, but then only with single a transmitter and a single receiver coil. Single-transmitter-coil, single-receiver-coil systems are susceptible to a loss in power transmission if the receiver coil is oriented such that no magnetic fields lines emanating from the transmitter coil passes through the receiver coil, e.g., if a flat receiver coil is oriented with its normal perpendicular to the magnetic field lines.
A wireless power transfer system is provided, comprising a flexible substrate adapted to conform to the body of a patient, a first transmitter resonator disposed on the flexible substrate, a second transmitter resonator disposed on the flexible substrate, the second transmitter resonator being in electronic communication with the first transmitter resonator; a receiver resonator; and a transmit controller configured to drive the first and second transmitter resonators to deliver wireless energy to the receiver resonator.
In some embodiments, the flexible substrate comprises a flexible fabric. In other embodiments, the flexible substrate is a material selected from the group consisting of Kapton, a polymide film, a polyester film, a cloth, and a rubber.
In one embodiment, the flexible substrate is covered with a padding to better match a contour of the body.
In some embodiments, the second transmitter resonator is driven out-of-phase from the first transmitter resonator.
In one embodiment, the first and second resonators coils are substantially rigid.
In some embodiments, the transmit controller is configured to operate in a test mode to drive the first transmitter resonator individually while a receive controller in the receiver resonator is configured to record a polarity of the magnetic flux received from the first transmitter resonator.
In another embodiment, the transmit controller is further configured to drive the second transmitter resonator individually while the receive controller in the receiver resonator is configured to record a polarity of the magnetic flux received from the second transmitter resonator.
In some embodiments, the receive controller is configured to communicate the measured polarity of the magnetic flux received from the first transmitter resonator to the transmit controller, and the transmit controller is configured to adjust transmission of power from the first transmitter resonator based on the recorded polarity.
In one embodiment, the receive controller is configured to communicate the measured polarity of the magnetic flux received from the second transmitter resonator to the transmit controller, and the transmit controller is configured to adjust transmission of power from the second transmitter resonator based on the measured polarity.
A method of adjusting wireless power transmission in a TET system is provided, comprising the steps of transmitting power from a first transmitter resonator external to a patient to a receiver resonator implanted within the patient, measuring a first polarity of magnetic flux received by the receiver resonator, transmitting power from a second transmitter resonator external to the patient to the receiver resonator implanted within the patient, measuring a second polarity of magnetic flux received by the receiver resonator, communicating the measured first and second polarities from the receiver resonator to a controller of the first and second transmitter resonators; and adjusting transmission of power from the first and second transmitter resonators based on the measured first and second polarities.
In some embodiments, the adjusting step comprises reversing a polarity of the first transmitter resonator.
In other embodiments, the adjusting step comprises reversing a polarity of the second transmitter resonator.
In some embodiments, the adjusting step comprises turning off the first transmitter resonator.
In one embodiment, the adjusting step comprises turning off the second transmitter resonator.
In some embodiments, the adjusting step comprises adjusting a polarity of one or more of the first and second transmitter resonators to maximize power received by the receiver resonator.
A wireless power transmitter is also provided, comprising coil circuitry including at least two transmit resonators, and driver circuitry including a voltage source, the driver circuitry configured to excite the coil circuitry to transmit wireless power from the at least two transmit resonators to a receiver.
In one embodiment, the coil circuitry includes four transmit resonators.
In another embodiment, the at least two transmit resonators comprise four resonators arranged in a 2×2 array.
In some embodiments, the transmit resonators are operated out of phase.
In other embodiments, the transmit resonators are operated in phase.
In one embodiment, at least one of the transmit resonators is operated in phase and at least one of the transmit resonators is operated out of phase.
A wireless power transfer system is provided, comprising first and second transmitter resonators configured to transmit wireless power to a receiver resonator implanted within a patient, a receive controller configured to measuring first and second polarities of magnetic flux received by the receiver resonator from the first and second transmitter resonators, respectively, the receive controller configured to communicate the measured first and second polarities to a transmit controller of the first and second transmitter resonators, the transmit controller configured to adjust transmission of power from the first and second transmitter resonators to the receiver resonator based on the measured first and second polarities to maximize power transfer.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
In the description that follows, like components have been given the same reference numerals, regardless of whether they are shown in different embodiments. To illustrate an embodiment(s) of the present disclosure in a clear and concise manner, the drawings may not necessarily be to scale and certain features may be shown in somewhat schematic form. Features that are described and/or illustrated with respect to one embodiment may be used in the same way or in a similar way in one or more other embodiments and/or in combination with or instead of the features of the other embodiments.
Various aspects of the invention are similar to those described in International Patent Pub. No. WO2012045050; U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,140,168; 7,865,245; 7,774,069; 7,711,433; 7,650,187; 7,571,007; 7,741,734; 7,825,543; 6,591,139; 6,553,263; and 5,350,413; and U.S. Pub. Nos. 2010/0308939; 2008/027293; and 2010/0102639, the entire contents of which patents and applications are incorporated herein for all purposes.
Wireless Power Transmission System
Power may be transmitted wirelessly by magnetic induction. In various embodiments, the transmitter and receiver are closely coupled.
In some cases “closely coupled” or “close coupling” refers to a system that requires the coils to be very near each other in order to operate. In some cases “loosely coupled” or “loose coupling” refers to a system configured to operate when the coils have a significant spatial and/or axial separation, and in some cases up to distance equal to or less than the diameter of the larger of the coils. In some cases, “loosely coupled” or “loose coupling” refers a system that is relatively insensitive to changes in physical separation and/or orientation of the receiver and transmitter.
In various embodiments, the transmitter and receiver are non-resonant coils. For example, a change in current in one coil induces a changing magnetic field. The second coil within the magnetic field picks up the magnetic flux, which in turn induces a current in the second coil. An example of a closely coupled system with non-resonant coils is described in International Pub. No. WO2000/074747, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference. A conventional transformer is another example of a closely coupled, non-resonant system. In various embodiments, the transmitter and receiver are resonant coils. For example, one or both of the coils is connected to a tuning capacitor or other means for controlling the frequency in the respective coil. An example of closely coupled system with resonant coils is described in International Pub. Nos. WO2001/037926; WO2012/087807; WO2012/087811; WO2012/087816; WO2012/087819; WO2010/030378; and WO2012/056365, and U.S. Pub. No. 2003/0171792, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
In various embodiments, the transmitter and receiver are loosely coupled. For example, the transmitter can resonate to propagate magnetic flux that is picked up by the receiver at relatively great distances. In some cases energy can be transmitted over several meters. In a loosely coupled system power transfer may not necessarily depend on a critical distance. Rather, the system may be able to accommodate changes to the coupling coefficient between the transmitter and receiver. An example of a loosely coupled system is described in International Pub. No. WO2012/045050, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
Power may be transmitted wirelessly by radiating energy. In various embodiments, the system comprises antennas. The antennas may be resonant or non-resonant. For example, non-resonant antennas may radiate electromagnetic waves to create a field. The field can be near field or far field. The field can be directional. Generally far field has greater range but a lower power transfer rate. An example of such a system for radiating energy with resonators is described in International Pub. No. WO2010/089354, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference. An example of such a non-resonant system is described in International Pub. No. WO2009/018271, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference. Instead of antenna, the system may comprise a high energy light source such as a laser. The system can be configured so photons carry electromagnetic energy in a spatially restricted, direct, coherent path from a transmission point to a receiving point. An example of such a system is described in International Pub. No. WO2010/089354, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
Power may also be transmitted by taking advantage of the material or medium through which the energy passes. For example, volume conduction involves transmitting electrical energy through tissue between a transmitting point and a receiving point. An example of such a system is described in International Pub. No. WO2008/066941, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
Power may also be transferred using a capacitor charging technique. The system can be resonant or non-resonant. Exemplars of capacitor charging for wireless energy transfer are described in International Pub. No. WO2012/056365, incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
The system in accordance with various aspects of the invention will now be described in connection with a system for wireless energy transfer by magnetic induction. The exemplary system utilizes resonant power transfer. The system works by transmitting power between the two inductively coupled coils. In contrast to a transformer, however, the exemplary coils are not coupled together closely. A transformer generally requires the coils to be aligned and positioned directly adjacent each other. The exemplary system accommodates looser coupling of the coils.
While described in terms of one receiver coil and one transmitter coil, one will appreciate from the description herein that the system may use two or more receiver coils and two or more transmitter coils. For example, the transmitter may be configured with two coils—a first coil to resonate flux and a second coil to excite the first coil. One will further appreciate from the description herein that usage of “resonator” and “coil” may be used somewhat interchangeably. In various respects, “resonator” refers to a coil and a capacitor connected together.
In accordance with various embodiments of this disclosure, the system comprises one or more transmitters configured to transmit power wirelessly to one or more receivers. In various embodiments, the system includes a transmitter and more than one receiver in a multiplexed arrangement. A frequency generator may be electrically coupled to the transmitter to drive the transmitter to transmit power at a particular frequency or range of frequencies. The frequency generator can include a voltage controlled oscillator and one or more switchable arrays of capacitors, a voltage controlled oscillator and one or more varactors, a phase-locked-loop, a direct digital synthesizer, or combinations thereof. The transmitter can be configured to transmit power at multiple frequencies simultaneously. The frequency generator can include two or more phase-locked-loops electrically coupled to a common reference oscillator, two or more independent voltage controlled oscillators, or combinations thereof. The transmitter can be arranged to simultaneously delivery power to multiple receivers at a common frequency.
In various embodiments, the transmitter is configured to transmit a low power signal at a particular frequency. The transmitter may transmit the low power signal for a particular time and/or interval. In various embodiments, the transmitter is configured to transmit a high power signal wirelessly at a particular frequency. The transmitter may transmit the high power signal for a particular time and/or interval.
In various embodiments, the receiver includes a frequency selection mechanism electrically coupled to the receiver coil and arranged to allow the resonator to change a frequency or a range of frequencies that the receiver can receive. The frequency selection mechanism can include a switchable array of discrete capacitors, a variable capacitance, one or more inductors electrically coupled to the receiving antenna, additional turns of a coil of the receiving antenna, or combinations thereof.
In general, most of the flux from the transmitter coil does not reach the receiver coil. The amount of flux generated by the transmitter coil that reaches the receiver coil is described by “k” and referred to as the “coupling coefficient.”
In various embodiments, the system is configured to maintain a value of k in the range of between about 0.2 to about 0.01. In various embodiments, the system is configured to maintain a value of k of at least 0.01, at least 0.02, at least 0.03, at least 0.04, at least 0.05, at least 0.1, or at least 0.15.
In various embodiments, the coils are physically separated. In various embodiments, the separation is greater than a thickness of the receiver coil. In various embodiments, the separation distance is equal to or less than the diameter of the larger of the receiver and transmitter coil.
Because most of the flux does not reach the receiver, the transmitter coil must generate a much larger field than what is coupled to the receiver. In various embodiments, this is accomplished by configuring the transmitter with a large number of amp-turns in the coil.
Since only the flux coupled to the receiver gets coupled to a real load, most of the energy in the field is reactive. The current in the coil can be sustained with a capacitor connected to the coil to create a resonator. The power source thus only needs to supply the energy absorbed by the receiver. The resonant capacitor maintains the excess flux that is not coupled to the receiver.
In various embodiments, the impedance of the receiver is matched to the transmitter. This allows efficient transfer of energy out of the receiver. In this case the receiver coil may not need to have a resonant capacitor.
Turning now to
The exemplary transmitter includes a coil Lx connected to a power source Vs by a capacitor Cx. The exemplary receiver includes a coil Ly connected to a load by a capacitor Cy. Capacitor Cx may be configured to make Lx resonate at a desired frequency. Capacitance Cx of the transmitter coil may be defined by its geometry. Inductors Lx and Ly are connected by coupling coefficient k. Mxy is the mutual inductance between the two coils. The mutual inductance, Mxy, is related to coupling coefficient, k.
Mxy=k√{square root over (Lx·Ly)}
In the exemplary system a power source Vs can be in series with a transmitter coil Lx so it may have to carry all the reactive current. This puts a larger burden on the current rating of the power source and any resistance in the source will add to losses.
The exemplary system includes a receiver configured to receive energy wirelessly transmitted by the transmitter. The exemplary receiver is connected to a load. The receiver and load may be connected electrically with a controllable switch.
In various embodiments, the receiver includes a circuit element configured to be connected or disconnected from the receiver coil by an electronically controllable switch. The electrical coupling can include both a serial and parallel arrangement. The circuit element can include a resistor, capacitor, inductor, lengths of an antenna structure, or combinations thereof. The system can be configured such that power is transmitted by the transmitter and can be received by the receiver in predetermined time increments.
In various embodiments, the transmitter coil and/or the receiver coil is a substantially two-dimensional structure. In various embodiments, the transmitter coil may be coupled to a transmitter impedance-matching structure. Similarly, the receiver coil may be coupled to a receiver impedance-matching structure. Examples of suitable impedance-matching structures include, but are not limited to, a coil, a loop, a transformer, and/or any impedance-matching network. An impedance-matching network may include inductors or capacitors configured to connect a signal source to the resonator structure.
In various embodiments, the transmitter is controlled by a controller (as shown in
In various embodiments, the transmitter coil is connected to an impedance-matched coil loop. The loop is connected to a power source and is configured to excite the transmitter coil. The first coil loop may have finite output impedance. A signal generator output may be amplified and fed to the transmitter coil. In use power is transferred magnetically between the first coil loop and the main transmitter coil, which in turns transmits flux to the receiver. Energy received by the receiver coil is delivered by Ohmic connection to the load.
One of the challenges to a practical circuit is how to get energy in and out of the resonators. Simply putting the power source and load in series or parallel with the resonators is difficult because of the voltage and current required. In various embodiments, the system is configured to achieve an approximate energy balance by analyzing the system characteristics, estimating voltages and currents involved, and controlling circuit elements to deliver the power needed by the receiver.
In an exemplary embodiment, the system load power, PL, is assumed to be 15 Watts and the operating frequency, f, is 250 kHz. Then, for each cycle the load removes a certain amount of energy from the resonance:
It has been found that the energy in the receiver resonance is typically several times larger than the energy removed by the load for operative, implantable medical devices. In various embodiments, the system assumes a ratio 7:1 for energy at the receiver versus the load removed. Under this assumption, the instantaneous energy in the exemplary receiver resonance is 420 μJ.
The exemplary circuit was analyzed and the self inductance of the receiver coil was found to be 60 uH. From the energy and the inductance, the voltage and current in the resonator could be calculated.
The voltage and current can be traded off against each other. The inductor may couple the same amount of flux regardless of the number of turns. The Amp-turns of the coil needs to stay the same in this example, so more turns means the current is reduced. The coil voltage, however, will need to increase. Likewise, the voltage can be reduced at the expense of a higher current. The transmitter coil needs to have much more flux. The transmitter flux is related to the receiver flux by the coupling coefficient. Accordingly, the energy in the field from the transmitter coil is scaled by k.
Given that k is 0.05.
For the same circuit the self inductance of the transmitter coil was 146 uH as mentioned above. This results in:
One can appreciate from this example, the competing factors and how to balance voltage, current, and inductance to suit the circumstance and achieve the desired outcome. Like the receiver, the voltage and current can be traded off against each other. In this example, the voltages and currents in the system are relatively high. One can adjust the tuning to lower the voltage and/or current at the receiver if the load is lower.
Estimation of Coupling Coefficient and Mutual Inductance
As explained above, the coupling coefficient, k, may be useful for a number of reasons. In one example, the coupling coefficient can be used to understand the arrangement of the coils relative to each other so tuning adjustments can be made to ensure adequate performance. If the receiver coil moves away from the transmitter coil, the mutual inductance will decrease, and ceteris paribus, less power will be transferred. In various embodiments, the system is configured to make tuning adjustments to compensate for the drop in coupling efficiency.
The exemplary system described above often has imperfect information. For various reasons as would be understood by one of skill in the art, the system does not collect data for all parameters. Moreover, because of the physical gap between coils and without an external means of communications between the two resonators, the transmitter may have information that the receiver does not have and vice versa. These limitations make it difficult to directly measure and derive the coupling coefficient, k, in real time.
Described below are several principles for estimating the coupling coefficient, k, for two coils of a given geometry. The approaches may make use of techniques such as Biot-Savart calculations or finite element methods. Certain assumptions and generalizations, based on how the coils interact in specific orientations, are made for the sake of simplicity of understanding. From an electric circuit point of view, all the physical geometry permutations can generally lead to the coupling coefficient.
If two coils are arranged so they are in the same plane, with one coil circumscribing the other, then the coupling coefficient can be estimated to be roughly proportional to the ratio of the area of the two coils. This assumes the flux generated by coil 1 is roughly uniform over the area it encloses as shown in
If the coils are out of alignment such that the coils are at a relative angle, the coupling coefficient will decrease. The amount of the decrease is estimated to be about equal to the cosine of the angle as shown in
If the coils are arraigned such that half the flux from one coil is in one direction and the other half is in the other direction, the flux cancels out and the coupling coefficient is zero, as shown in
A final principle relies on symmetry of the coils. The coupling coefficient and mutual inductance from one coil to the other is assumed to be the same regardless of which coil is being energized.
Mxy=Myx
As described above, a typical TET system can be subdivided into two parts, the transmitter and the receiver. Control and tuning may or may not operate on the two parts independently. For example, as shown in
According to one embodiment, a TET system can include a set of transmitter coils and a set of receiver coils. The number of coils within each set can be as few as one, however, if there is only one receiver coil there must be at least two transmitter coils, and if there is only one transmitter coil there must be at least two receiver coils. Thus, at least one of the receiver or the transmitter must have more than one coil.
This invention modifies the existing components of a magnetic power transmission system, specifically it introduces phased arrays of transmitter coils and/or phased arrays of receiver coils. By utilizing information transmitted back from the receiver to the transmitter, the system can guarantee that a maximum magnetic flux reaches the receiver coils for a given geometry. This allows for more flexibility in the spatial arrangement between the transmitter and receiver by maintaining a more constant rate of power transfer than presently exists with existing systems. Various aspects of the invention are directed to grouping of a plurality of coils and structures and methods for driving and/or controlling the coils.
The coils can be driven by independent, but synchronized, driver circuits, or they can be driven by a single common circuit, such as those described below. In some embodiments, pairs of transmit coils can be driven by a single circuit.
In one embodiment, shown in
Multiple transmitter coil control systems can be based on a single transmitter circuit.
Without CA, the circuit compensation would have to be done entirely by the variable capacitance CX2, requiring a much larger variable range of CX2. A larger range of CX2 is disadvantageous because of increased cost, more difficult circuit control, and lower precision in the circuit compensation that in turn leads to an overall lower power transfer efficiency.
With multiple transmitter coils there is a mutual inductance not only between each transmitter coil and the receiver coil, but between each pair of transmitter coils. With two transmitter coils, we can call the latter M12. Switching phase on a transmitter coil causes a sign change on the M12-induced voltage. This is equivalent of thinking of both transmitter coils as a system with a single self-inductance, and saying that the self-inductance is changed. As a result, the primary circuit capacitance has to be adjusted, or else the eigen frequency LC may be wrong.
If all four coils are placed symmetrically, only a single capacitor CA is required to compensate for mutual inductance changes when operating all coils in-phase or pair-wise out of phase. In this embodiment, the transmitter system provides efficient power transfer without a significant increase in complexity. Moreover, the number of system options is increased significantly.
One will appreciate from the description herein that the coils can be modified in a number of ways—number, position, and phase—to achieve a desired outcome. The system also provides a simple way to control the multiple transmission coils to achieve a greater number of possibilities. In some embodiments, multiple coil systems can comprise two coils placed in the same plane, four coils placed in a square array in the same plane, two coils at a 90 degree angle to each other, four coils arranged in pairs, with each pair at an angle to each other. Additionally, coils can be placed at angles of up to 120, 135, 150, etc degrees to each other. In another embodiment, a large coil can circumscribe a smaller coil in the same plane. In another embodiment, coils of the same or different size and same plane can be offset along an axis. In one embodiment, pairs of coils can have the same size and same normal vector, but offset along the axis and one pair rotated 90 degrees around the axis. Additionally, in one embodiment there can be 2 four coil arrays of the same size and orientation, but offset along an axis.
The advantage of a multi-transmitter coil system is that the receiver can be located anywhere, and in any orientation, in the volume adjacent to either of the transmission coils. The use of a large transmission coil is both costly and cumbersome compared to the multiple smaller coils. The inventive system is also believed to be effective in a wider range of situations, in part because the phases can be modified.
A TET system according to one embodiment can operate in two modes: a test mode and a power transmission mode. In its simplest configuration (see other configuration options below), there are several transmitter coils, but typically only one receiver coil.
Generally speaking, in the test mode, the transmitter system (such as the transmitter of
It is assumed the wavelength of the magnetic field is much larger than the characteristic dimensions of the transmitter and the receiver. If this is not the case, the receiver needs to record phase information during the test mode, and each transmitter coil should be offset by its phase lag during power transmission mode. In applications where the operating frequency is hundreds of kilohertz (e.g., 250 kHz), the wavelength is at least hundreds of meter (1.2 km at 250 kHz), so for devices no larger than a few meters, phase information is unnecessary and coils should operate either in phase (0° phase) or out-of-phase (180° phase), as described.
Since power transmission in a TET system typically occurs at frequencies of hundreds of kilohertz, the test mode can be completed on the order of a few milliseconds, or even than one millisecond, even for up to 100 separate transmitter coils, much faster than any realistic change of the geometry. This means the geometry of the transmitter can be tested regularly, e.g., once a second, with no significant loss in power transfer rate. It is also possible to configure the receiver to alert the transmitter if the power transfer rate drops, and then begin a new test mode.
In the power transmission mode, all transmission coils can operate simultaneously, but can be divided into groups based on the polarity (plus or minus) of the received magnetic flux from each coil in the test mode. Thus, transmission of power from the transmitter resonators to the receiver resonator can be adjusted based on the recorded polarities of each transmitter resonator from the test mode. The goal is to maximize the amount of flux passing through the receiver resonator. But, flux in the plus direction cancels out flux in the negative direction. As
For example, in a four coil transmitter system as shown in
In this configuration, the magnetic flux (and thus received electric power) is maximized given the geometry of the system.
There are several possible permutations of the test mode. Any binary search algorithm can be used, i.e., any number of transmitter coils could be powered at a time, as long as different combinations are tested in such a way as to deduce the appropriate polarity of each transmitter coil.
In one embodiment, to achieve maximum energy transfer the master transmitter controller can implement a process as follows (this is the binary algorithm):
1. The controller turns on each individual transmitter, one at a time, for a specific amount of time. The controller then waits for the receiver to send back information relating to the power received by each transmitter coil. This process can be used to determine which, if any of the transmitter coils transferred any power.
2. Next, the master controller can turn on the transmitter coils that successfully transferred power to the receiver, both with the same polarity. The receiver can send back the amount of power received, and compare that to the power originally received by the individual coils.
3. If the power received was less than originally received in 1. above, the master controller can adjust the polarity of the individual transmitter coils. The receiver compares the amount of power received in each iteration to previously received power levels until a maximum power and ideal polarity configuration is identified.
The difference between this invention and existing solutions is that this invention guarantees the avoidance of zero power transfer situations, and it significantly improves the power transfer rate in situations where other solutions can only provide a marginal power transfer rate. It can be cheaper to manufacture than exotically shaped receiver coils. The disadvantages may be that the mass of the transmitter increases, which means that there is a trade-off between mass and the power transfer improvements offered by this system when the transmitter is carried by a person. Another potential disadvantage is that some more control logic is needed by this system.
Utilizing an array of transmitter resonators allows for individually rigid resonators and electronics to be combined into a flexible array that may be worn by a person or made to conform to a surface. In this manner, the coupling coefficient between the transmitting array and the receiver resonator can be tailored by turning on, turning off, or reversing the polarity of current through the transmitting coils. This allows increased power transfer efficiency. Various arrays of flexibly connected rigid coils are shown in
As shown in
When used in an environment with conductive metal surfaces, such as an operating theater or hospital, magnetic shielding can be utilized to minimize the parasitic losses of the transmitter array. Nearby moderately conductive objects comprised of steel, titanium, or similar materials act to both block the magnetic fields between the transmitter and receiver as well as dissipate the resonant energy as heat. Magnetic shielding such as ferrite can be used with the transmitter to minimize the effects of nearby parasitic objects, but materials such as ferrite are brittle. In one embodiment, a separate piece of ferrite can be placed on individual resonators only. This can allow for the array itself to remain flexible. Another approach is to use malleable magnetic metals in conjunction with insulator strips to provide both magnetic shielding and overall array flexibility.
Multiple coil systems according to this disclosure advantageously shape the magnetic field to maximize the power transmitted to the receiver. The shaping is accomplished with coils of any shape, including simple, flat coils that are grouped to operate either in-phase or out-of-phase with each other. This approach provides increased efficiency and reliability in situations where the receiver is not guaranteed to be stationary with respect to the transmitter, particularly in medically implanted wireless power transfer systems.
These techniques have not been contemplated by others in the art since many wireless power transfer systems to date have required chargers for objects such as cellular phones, consumer electronics, vehicles, etc, that remain stationary while charging. By contrast, for an implantable medical application, a patient must be free to move around even while the implanted device is receiving power.
As described above, the magnetic flux in the receiver coil can be maximized given the geometry of the system at the moment in time of the test mode. If the geometry of the system is changing with time, e.g., if the receiver is moving or rotating with respect to the transmitter (such as a person with an implanted receiver moving around in a bed with a transmitter below the mattress, or moving around a room or office with a wall transmitter), or if the transmitter coils are moving with respect to each other (such as a person with an implanted receiver who wears a garment with transmitters, and this garment is worn slightly differently at different times, or if the garment moves in the wind), the system can run the test mode again, to determine a new optimum grouping of the transmission coils.
As an optional feature, the receiver can record the amplitude of received magnetic flux (or received current, voltage, or power) during the test mode. This can be done in a situation where the system is not maximizing the received magnetic flux, but rather maximizes the power transfer ratio, i.e., in situations where power loss in the transmitter is an issue, such as when the transmitter is battery-powered instead of connected to wall power. By recording received magnetic flux amplitude, the system can choose to not power certain transmission coils in the power transmission mode, namely all those coils which did not produce a threshold value of magnetic flux in the test mode. A higher threshold value means a more power efficient system. A lower threshold value means more total power transmitted (down to zero threshold value, which maximizes the power transmitted as described above).
Note that the system could use, instead of just one receiver coil and an array of transmitter coils, two or more receiver coils along with one or more transmitter coils. In this case, during the test mode, each transmitter coil can be operated one at a time, while each receiver coil is operated one at a time, until all combinations are tested, and amplitude responses are recorded. Alternatively, any binary search algorithm can be used. Then, the best receiver coil (the coil with the largest sum total of magnetic flux received) can be selected for operation, and the transmitter coils grouped in-phase and out-of-phase as described above. Finally, the other receiver coils are connected in phase with the first receiver coil (such that all receiver coils contribute current to the receiver circuit in phase with each other). Just like what was described above, individual transmitter or receiver coils can be removed from the circuits if threshold values are not achieved.
The embodiments described herein do not depend on any particular shape, size, position, or orientation of transmitter or receiver coils. Coils of different shapes and sizes are allowed, at arbitrary positions and orientations, including overlapping. The number of coils needed typically is at least three (one receiver coil, two transmitter coils, or vice versa), but there is no upper limit to the number of coils that can be included in the system.
This disclosure can pertain to any device that receives power wirelessly at a distance from the power source, including all types of electronics (cell phones, portable computers, PDAs, mobile games, remote controls, etc), electric cars, trains, and other vehicles, or any other device that uses electric power. The invention could be used to charge the batteries of any such device, or to power it directly. The invention does not rely on either the transmitter or receiver being in resonance, although it can take advantage of such systems.
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/717,271, filed on Sep. 27, 2017, titled “Magnetic Power Transmission Utilizing Phased Transmitter Coil Arrays and Phased Receiver Coil Arrays”, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/953,629, filed on Jul. 29, 2013, titled “Magnetic Power Transmission Utilizing Phased Transmitter Coil Arrays and Phased Receiver Coil Arrays”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/676,723, filed on Jul. 27, 2012, titled “Magnetic Power Transmission Utilizing Phased Transmitter Coil Arrays and Phased Receiver Coil Arrays”, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/790,795, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, titled “Magnetic Power Transmission Utilizing Phased Transmitter Coil Arrays and Phased Receiver Coil Arrays”, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/676,656, filed on Jul. 27, 2012, titled “Resonant Power Transmission Coils and Systems”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4352960 | Dormer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4561443 | Hogrefe et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4561444 | Livingston et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4630615 | Yomtov | Dec 1986 | A |
4679560 | Galbraith | Jul 1987 | A |
4726378 | Kaplan | Feb 1988 | A |
4736747 | Drake | Apr 1988 | A |
4924171 | Baba et al. | May 1990 | A |
4945305 | Blood | Jul 1990 | A |
5346458 | Affeld | Sep 1994 | A |
5350413 | Miller et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5569156 | Mussivand | Oct 1996 | A |
5630836 | Prem et al. | May 1997 | A |
5690693 | Wang et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702431 | Wang et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5755748 | Borza | May 1998 | A |
5771438 | Palermo et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5831248 | Hojyo et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5948006 | Mann | Sep 1999 | A |
6123726 | Mori et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6149683 | Lancisi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6212430 | Kung | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6296533 | Grubbs et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320354 | Sengupta et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324431 | Zarinetchi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327504 | Dolgin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6389318 | Zarinetchi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400991 | Kung | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442434 | Zarinetchi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451055 | Weiss | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458164 | Weiss | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478820 | Weiss | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6553263 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579315 | Weiss | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591139 | Loftin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605032 | Benkowski et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6647298 | Abrahamson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650213 | Sakurai et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6723039 | French et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6772011 | Dolgin | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6801807 | Abrahamson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810289 | Shaquer | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6850803 | Jimenez et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6894456 | Tsukamoto et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895281 | Amundson et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6949065 | Sporer et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960968 | Odenaal et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967621 | Cadotte, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985773 | Von Arx et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7015769 | Schulman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7107103 | Schulman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126310 | Barron | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7225032 | Schmeling et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7246040 | Borg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286880 | Olson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7428438 | Parramon et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7471986 | Hatlestad | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496733 | Altman et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505816 | Schmeling et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515012 | Schulman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522878 | Baarman | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7571007 | Erickson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587241 | Parramon et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599743 | Hassler, Jr. et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7650187 | Gruber et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650192 | Wahlstrand | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7711433 | Davis et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720546 | Ginggen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7741734 | Joannopoulos et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761164 | Verhoef et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774069 | Olson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782190 | Martin et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7805200 | Kast et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7812481 | Iisaka et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7825543 | Karalis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7830114 | Reed | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7865245 | Torgerson et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7872367 | Recksiek et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7904170 | Harding | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7932696 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7962222 | He et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
RE42682 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Sep 2011 | E |
8076801 | Karalis et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081925 | Parramon et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8096954 | Stahmann et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8140168 | Olson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150529 | Snell et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165694 | Carbunaru et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8185212 | Carbunaru et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8193766 | Rondoni et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8203434 | Yoshida | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8244367 | Wahlstrand et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8247926 | Issa et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8258653 | Kitamura et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8265770 | Toy et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8278784 | Cook et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292052 | Bohori et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299652 | Smith et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301079 | Baarman | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8319473 | Choi et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8362742 | Kallmyer | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373310 | Baarman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8378522 | Cook et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8378523 | Cook et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8463395 | Forsell | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489200 | Zarinetchi et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8551163 | Aber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562508 | Dague et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8581793 | Carr | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587154 | Fells et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8620447 | D'Ambrosio et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8628460 | Yomtov et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629578 | Kurs et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8668473 | Larose et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8694117 | Aghassian et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8810071 | Sauerlaender et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8884468 | Lemmens et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8909351 | Dinsmoor et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8971958 | Frikart et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9106083 | Partovi | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9192704 | Yomtov et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9302093 | Mashiach | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9515494 | Kurs et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9515495 | Kurs et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9560787 | Kallmyer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20020038138 | Zarinetchi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020087204 | Kung et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093456 | Sawamura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030171792 | Zarinetchi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040138725 | Forsell | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040256146 | Frericks et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050288743 | Ahn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060199997 | Hassler, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060271129 | Tai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070096686 | Jimenez et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123948 | Dal Molin | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142696 | Crosby et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080027293 | Vodermayer et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080149736 | Kim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167531 | McDermott | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211320 | Cook et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090018616 | Quick et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090051224 | Cook et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090072628 | Cook et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090112291 | Wahlstrand et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090174264 | Onishi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212736 | Baarman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090226328 | Morello | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270679 | Hoeg et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284220 | Toncich et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100019985 | Bashyam et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033021 | Bennett | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045114 | Sample et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063347 | Yomtov et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066305 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069992 | Aghassian et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100109958 | Haubrich et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114143 | Albrecht et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122995 | Thomas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100171368 | Schatz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100184371 | Cook et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194334 | Kirby et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210233 | Cook et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211134 | Forsell | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222848 | Forsell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222849 | Forsell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100225174 | Jiang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244576 | Hillan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256708 | Thornton et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277121 | Hall et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100308939 | Kurs | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100314946 | Budde et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110025132 | Sato | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043050 | Yabe et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046699 | Mazanec et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057607 | Carobolante | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101790 | Budgett | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109263 | Sakoda et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115431 | Dunworth et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127848 | Ryu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148215 | Marzetta et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178361 | Yomtov | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110181235 | Walley et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205083 | Janna et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110241436 | Furukawa | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110245892 | Kast et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110266880 | Kim et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276110 | Whitehurst et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110278948 | Forsell | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291489 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110291613 | Rosik et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295345 | Wells et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298294 | Takada et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301667 | Olson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313238 | Reichenbach et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001485 | Uchida | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120007437 | Fells et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120032522 | Schatz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039102 | Shinoda | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057322 | Waffenschmidt | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065458 | Tol | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120080957 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120091951 | Sohn | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120104997 | Carobolante | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109256 | Meskins et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120119914 | Uchida | May 2012 | A1 |
20120146575 | Armstrong et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120149229 | Kearsley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150259 | Meskens | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120157753 | D'Ambrosio | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120157754 | D'Ambrosio | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158407 | Forsell | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161539 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164943 | Bennett | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169132 | Choudhary et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169133 | Lisi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169137 | Lisi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169139 | Kudo | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169278 | Choi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120175967 | Dibben et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120239118 | Ozawa et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245649 | Bohori et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120274148 | Sung et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120306433 | Kim et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007949 | Kurs et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130060103 | Bergida et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130119773 | Davis | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127253 | Stark et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130149960 | Dec et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159956 | Verghese et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130190551 | Callaway et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130197607 | Wilder et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130214731 | Dinsmoor et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241302 | Miyamoto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241306 | Aber et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241468 | Moshfeghi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130271088 | Hwang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289334 | Badstibner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130310630 | Smith et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130320773 | Schatz et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331638 | Cameron et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140005466 | Crosby et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140011447 | Konanur et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028110 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031606 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140152252 | Wood | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140163644 | Scott et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140265620 | Hoarau et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140265621 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275727 | Bonde et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150180241 | Petersen et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150207330 | Petersen | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207331 | Petersen | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150222127 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150222128 | Hansen | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150222139 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150229289 | Suzuki | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150290373 | Rudser et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160218432 | Pope et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160250484 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160254703 | Hansen | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160254704 | Hansen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202012000166 | Apr 2013 | DE |
102012201073 | Jul 2013 | DE |
1513241 | Mar 2005 | EP |
H03109063 | May 1991 | JP |
H11506646 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2013094456 | May 2013 | JP |
2013161640 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2014160611 | Sep 2014 | JP |
1020020089605 | Nov 2002 | KR |
1020120007296 | Jan 2012 | KR |
1020120077448 | Jul 2012 | KR |
0001442 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0074747 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0137926 | May 2001 | WO |
2005106901 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2007053881 | May 2007 | WO |
2008066941 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2009018271 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009021220 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009023905 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009042977 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2010030378 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010089354 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2011081626 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011113934 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012002063 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012056365 | May 2012 | WO |
2012087807 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012087811 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012087816 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012087819 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012099965 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012141752 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013110602 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013138451 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014039673 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bonde et al.; Promise of unrestricted mobility with innovative, portable wireless powering of a mechanical circulatory assist device; American Association for Thoracic Surgery; © 2012; 2 pgs.; retrieved Mar. 12, 2014 from the internet: http://aats.org/annualmeeting/Abstracts/2012/T8.cgi. |
Chargepoint, Inc.; −chargepoin+®; product brochure; 4 pgs.; © 2014; retrieved Mar. 12, 2014 from the internet: http://www.chargepoint.com/network/. |
Dixon, Jr.; Eddy current losses in transformer windings and circuit wiring; Unitrode Corp. Seminar Manual (SEM600); Watertown, MA; 12 pgs.; 1988 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date). |
Evatran; PluglessTM Level 2 EV Charging System (3.3kW); product brochure; 7 pgs.; retrieved Mar. 12, 2014 from the Internet: http://www.pluglesspower.com/tech-specs/. |
Ferret, B.; Electric vehicles get big boost!; Renewable Energy World; 3 pgs.; Jul. 30, 2012; retrieved Jul. 30, 2012 from the internet: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2012/07/. |
Motavalli, Jim; WiTricity Takes Its Car-Charging Technology Out for a Road Test; New York Times; 3 pgs.; Jul. 25, 2012; retrieved Mar. 12, 2014 from the internet: http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/25/witricity-takes-its-car-charging-technology-out-for-a-road-test/. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/051474, dated Dec. 30, 2015. |
Development and Implementation of RFID Technology, Ed. Cristina Turcu, Feb. 2009, pp. 28-30, 93-97. |
Merli, Francesco, et al., “Design, Realization and Measurements of a Miniature Antenna for Implantable Wireless Communication Systems”, IEEE Transaction on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, No. 10, Oct. 2011, pp. 3544-3555. |
Merli, Francesco, et al., “The Effect of Insulating Layers on the Performance of Implanted Antennas”, IEEE Transaction on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, No. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 21-31. |
Abadia, Javier, et al., 3D-Spiral Small Antenna Design and Realization for Biomdical Telemetry in the MICS Band. Radioengineering, vol. 18, No. 4, Dec. 2009, pp. 359-367. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190044394 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61676723 | Jul 2012 | US | |
61790795 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61676656 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13953629 | Jul 2013 | US |
Child | 15717271 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15717271 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | 16151458 | US |